Bob Katter gave a press conference today, to announce that he may or may not form a new party. In the end, that was hardly the point.

Bob Katter's scary vision of the Australian workforce of the future
If the independent member for Kennedy was sketchy on the details of his immediate political future, he was as forthright as a charging bull on his concern for the future of the Australian economy, a concern the nation’s leaders appear to have forgotten.

As usual this week, our leaders are banging on about big picture crap. Gillard is flogging her dead horse of a carbon tax, Abbott’s busy telling us the sky is falling under the weight of asylum seekers, while Bob Brown continues to rail against everything except the destruction of the trees he was originally elected to protect.

Amid all the grandstanding and symbolism, the only man who actually talked about the state of the nation was the member for the north Queensland seat of Kennedy. Those quaint rural folk are so naïve, aren’t they?

Katter’s press conference yesterday was quite the show. You could almost hear the 1812 overture in the background.

Looking as though he may burst into tears, or a fit of rage, or both, the hatless Katter unleashed a tirade on the state of the Australian economy, with a particular focus on mining, agriculture and the automotive industries, the latter two of which have experienced staggering declines in recent years and decades.

With a bombastic mix of militaristic language, which included lines like “we have tanks and artillery and ammo ready to go”, Katter did his level best to drag the national dialogue to the place it should be – namely, our collective economic future.

“The future for your kids is to drive dump trucks,” Katter thundered at one point, and while that would currently seem a decent option for the likes of my four year old son who is obsessed with big yellow diggers, it’s fair to say he and his generation might feel differently in years to come.

But they may not have a choice.

As Katter pointed out yesterday, the state of Australia’s primary industries is nowhere near as strong as the majority of us in our comfortably numb suburban torpor would assume.

Katter undermined, excuse the pun, the very foundation of our mining economy. The guts of his argument is that we mine ore and ship it overseas, rather than reaping the profits of mineral processing, which is much more lucrative.

The impending closure of the Xstrata copper smelter in Mt Isa, in the heart of Katter’s electorate, is a case in point.

Katter’s ruddy cheeks grew ruddier, and his righteous sneer yet more righteous, when he talked of the decline of Australia’s automotive industry, which has seen 4,500 workers lose their jobs, as the proportion of home made cars dropped from 86 per cent to 14 per cent in the last two decades.

As for the nation that once rode on the sheep’s back, well now. Didn’t Katter have an eye-opener for us all yesterday.

“In Agriculture, cattle numbers are down 20 per cent; sheep numbers are down 60 per cent, he said.

“We’re closing a sugar mill every two years. The dairy industry – we’ve gone from $3,000 million in exports down to $600 million and soon there won’t be any at all.”

Katter even claimed that in five years, Australia will be a net importer of food, a stat which some say has already happened, even if industry groups say otherwise.

Details are Katter’s stumbling block. His weapon of choice is bluster, not minutiae. On this level, it has to be said he occasionally strays into Pauline Hanson EasyTax territory.

But give the bloke credit for at least talking about some real issues. He may not have a quick fix, but at least he’s trying. Imagine what the other nongs in Canberra might achieve if they got a bit of dirt under their shoes occasionally.

104 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Rick says:

      09:43am | 24/05/11

      Someone tell Bob you need more than one to form a party.

    • Greg Livingston says:

      06:52am | 24/05/11

      Driving home from a weekend in Denman on Sunday, my 18 year old daughter remarked. “You don’t see many sheep in the country any more.”
      Next thing we’re passing the open cuts and long rail trains into Newcastle port.

      Ask Bob about it.

    • No 1 Rosie says:

      07:29am | 24/05/11

      Oh dear, even Bob Katter wants part of the action. Bob has been missing from the fold and thought it was time Australia was reminded of his existence. Poor Bob his problem was he picked Tony Abbott instead of Gillard and in doing so he gets bugger all unlike the royal master of the NBN Tony Windsor.

      So many under achievers in Canberra wanting!

    • GordonT says:

      07:54am | 24/05/11

      Good on’yer Bob.
      He doesn’t need to elaborate on details, just have the ideas and ambition for his country.We have thousands of well-paid public servants to work out the detail of how these might be implemented.

    • Luke says:

      08:18am | 24/05/11

      Did you even read the article? Katter is actually talking about something of importance, unlike the rest of the idiots in parliament.

      Or do you think boat people, who make up less than a tiny proportion of illegal immigrants, deserve to be front page news?
      http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/cib/1999-2000/2000cib13.htm

      Do you think our politicians should be talking about planking, like their opinions are any better than your or mine?

      I would like to think that the miasma of stupidity that is our government, focus on actual important issues rather than chasing the 10 second soundbite that will garner them three more votes at the next election, or a few hundred thousand dollars more from their lobby group/business financiers.

      Alas, I remain disappointed because people like you just want sensationalist bullshit in the news, politicians who only ever act to please the most simple voters, and a glossy non-informative reporting of the Current Affairs type “issues”.

    • Catching up says:

      08:45am | 24/05/11

      Did Mr. Jatter actually pick Mr.Abbott.  My reading at the time, he realise that the PM had the numbers and he did not have to make a choice.  I was under the impression that he would be reluctant to bring the PM down.

    • sludger says:

      09:09am | 24/05/11

      Agree with Luke.  It is good to see someone actually thinking of more than the next soundbyte or how to get their snout further in the trough. Also refreshing not to have some pollie telling us they know what is good for us and we just better accept it.  so what if he doesn’t have the details?  People are paid to sort that out.  Let’s at least have someone with some bloody vision.

    • Glen says:

      01:40pm | 24/05/11

      What are you talking about Rosie most people would argue that Katter made the best decision of his political life with his LNP support.

      When the policies of the Green Labor Government come home to roost next election, I’ll wager Katter will be the only small party/independent left standing as an MP. I mean jez the guy may be as articulate as Joyce, but at least he knows a bum deal when he sees one. Something one can’t say about his turncoat colleagues.

      Brandt, Wilkie, Windsor and that bearded fellow - you are all totally screwed next election.

      And LABOR oh boy maybe not as screwed as the above fellows, but there will be retribution from your VB drinken, meat pie eaten, poof fearen & hard worken blue collar base - especially for throwing them to the latte sippen activist trend setting greenies.

    • Joan says:

      02:26pm | 24/05/11

      @Catching up

      Sorry, but your reading is completely wrong. Bob Katter sided with the Coalition before Windsor and Oakeshott made their call, not after. You can refresh your memory with the excellent Four Corners doco The Deal here.

    • No 1 Rosie says:

      02:27pm | 24/05/11

      Tut, Tut, Cool Down Guys.

      The Gillard Minority Labor Govt is not even a year old but it seems like it has been around for years. Everything they have decide on and tried to do has become long draw out, over-long never-ending political dubious milestones. It lacks core Labor values and real conviction, not sure anymore what they are doing or intend doing for the Australian people.

      My comments on Bob Katter was tongue in cheek, that was the spirit it was intended.

    • TimB says:

      07:53am | 24/05/11

      Hey if Katter does bring a new party into being and has a commonsense approach to some of the issues…He could get quite a bit of support.

      Of course it could be all hot air.

      But I tell you this, if (for example) he said he’d stop the wasted time and effort dealing with the carbon hysteria , and would instead channell resources into Thorium tech (see the other article)....He’d be three-quarters of the way to winning my vote.

    • mickijo says:

      02:21pm | 24/05/11

      A new non ALP and non Lib party is well overdue. My sincere hope is that both the ALp and the Greens nose dive and join the Democrats in the never never again. But we need someone to stop the Libs from big heading and keep them on the straight and narrow, I think Katter would be perfect for it. He is a dinkidi Australian and would be incorruptable I should imagine. He would be greeted with huge sighs of relief.

    • Rick says:

      03:40pm | 24/05/11

      That’ll make 2 of you then Tim, I suppose you can call that a party all be it a very dull one.

    • Rick says:

      04:33pm | 24/05/11

      Mickijo thats one hell of an imagination, thinking that Bob would be incoruptable. Wasn’t he part of the Joe B Perterson government ? possibly the most corrupt government Australia has ever seen. Better go feed the chooks Mick.

    • Damocles says:

      12:01pm | 29/05/11

      Hey Rick, just a quick correction, it’s NOT “all be it”, it’s “albeit” and for all the others who get it wrong, it’s not “I COULD care less”, it’s “I COULDN’T care less” and while I’m at it, it’s NOT “eccetera”, it’s “etcetera”. Oh, and to all you who are going to say I’m wrong in trying to promote some proper English usage….........ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!

    • acotrel says:

      07:55am | 24/05/11

      @Rosie I find it difficult why any person with ambitions to become PM, would oppose the NBN?  But the LNP have never been known to initiate a major infrastructure project, so why would Abbott try to do anything so constructive? I’m looking forward to the day he says something creative about Australia’s future, rather than dedicating his twisted thoughts towards his own political future.

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      12:09pm | 24/05/11

      I think putting all our eggs in one very, very expensive basket is dangerous, even replacing the very old copper system would make a difference. The NBN is not the complete answer

       

       

      the

    • Ray says:

      01:51pm | 24/05/11

      Any sensible person would oppose paying $40Billion for technology soon to be obsolete. As quoted in the SMH today, read and weep.

      “The scientists at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) said they had broken the world record by sending data at a speed of 26 terabits per second.

      The data, sent over 50 kilometres on a single laser beam, was coded thanks to a system known as orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) in which the laser beam is divided into separate colour streams.

      “With 26 terabits per second, you can simultaneously transmit up to 400 million telephone calls per second,” said Professor Juerg Leuthold of the institute in a statement.”

      This is the future of telecommunications

    • Spence says:

      02:09pm | 24/05/11

      Replacing the copper network would make a difference?  That is exactly what the NBN is doing!  The old copper network is decaying and costing an estimated $2billion or so a year to repair and maintain.  Since the majority of the cost of the NBN is labour, cost of replacing with copper wouldn’t vary that much from replacing with fibre. 

      Replacing the copper would be like buying a Commodore 64 for almost the same cost as a new Macbook. A huge waste of money for something that will need to be updated before you even receive it.

    • Spence says:

      02:09pm | 24/05/11

      Replacing the copper network would make a difference?  That is exactly what the NBN is doing!  The old copper network is decaying and costing an estimated $2billion or so a year to repair and maintain.  Since the majority of the cost of the NBN is labour, cost of replacing with copper wouldn’t vary that much from replacing with fibre. 

      Replacing the copper would be like buying a Commodore 64 for almost the same cost as a new Macbook. A huge waste of money for something that will need to be updated before you even receive it.

    • Luddite interprets article says:

      02:33pm | 24/05/11

      Yes Ray
      those laser beams are fool proof aren’t they?
      Work well in the rain? Go straight into your house? Not at all dangerous? Cost Much

      Yes,
      making fibre obsolete.
      It would be funny if you weren’t so ignorant.

    • Ray says:

      03:58pm | 24/05/11

      @Luddite - a very appropriate pen name indeed. My point, which by the way you completely missed, is that spending $40billion on technology that is already superceded is folly. Technology is moving so fast that what we use today will be obsolete in 1-2 years. The NBN’s 1 gigabyte per second will be slow by the time it gets to all homes in Oz.

      You obviously think that scientists who can produce 26 TERABYTES per second are too dumb to overcome any tranmission problems lasers may produce (I can"t believe you said they won’t work in the rain - do you think they just wash away -duh)

      Enjoy the NBN when it comes to you sometime in the next 5 - 10 years (if they haven’t gone broke before they finish the roll-out because don’t forget Oz’s population is set to rise by a few mill in that time and I’m sure they haven’t allowed for that in their budget) but don’t be too disappointed when it isn’t fast enough for you.

    • Luddite interprets article says:

      04:25pm | 24/05/11

      Hey Luddite ray,

      Using data from a single light source, the researchers generated, transmitted and decoded 325 data streams over 50 kilometres of dispersion-compensated fibre, at a line rate of 26 Tbps.
      Guess what?
      it was over fibre
      Luddite

    • majority says:

      04:53pm | 24/05/11

      @Luddite interprets article. Ok, it was over fibre. But developments like this could mean that significant parts of the NBN are over engineered. From what I hear the NBN design is already quite dated and doesn’t leverage latest developments. It will deliver broadband to most of Australia but at a much greater cost than necessary. But hey, it’s only our taxes at work.

    • Ray says:

      05:04pm | 24/05/11

      @Luddite - but you actually thought Lasers could be washed away in the rain!! I suppose you turn your laptop wi/fi connection off when it rains too so you don’t lose your signal or so it doesn’t get washed into someone elses laptop. No wonder you need fibre. Genius.

    • Luddite interprets article says:

      05:29pm | 24/05/11

      Sorry luddites
      No time to argue with dense matter,
      Carry on and talk amongst yourselves.

    • TChong says:

      08:02am | 24/05/11

      ‘We’ll all be rooned said Hanrahan”
      Bob yearns for a simplistic past that never existed in the first place.
      Another hillbilly bumpkin party, like Hansons flights of fancy, just as reactionary, contradictory .
      Abbott will be out to sink Katters party, just like he did with Hanson.

    • acotrel says:

      09:03am | 24/05/11

      But Chongy, they’ve got so much in common!

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      12:13pm | 24/05/11

      When you coast hugging soft palmed, limp wristed townies drive the last nail in the viability of rural Oz I hope you realise you’re going to starve to death in the dark, just 15% of Oz produces over 40% of Australia’s wealth, whilst NOT wearing an Armani suit

    • Patsy says:

      01:48pm | 24/05/11

      TChong, when was the last time you ventured from your latte swilling environment into the real Australia? I have recently returned from a trip that took me to the QLD border (Goondawindi), SA border (Silverton) and into VIC. At Mildura we bought a large net bag of oranges for $3 and same sized bag of grapes for $3.  And they were beautiful! Thanks to Woolies and Coles you can’t get that in the cities.
      If Katter had a party I could vote for I definately would. He knows our “food bowl” is dying and he knows what to do about it. Support our farmers that feed us and buy AUSTRALIAN!

    • Joan says:

      02:31pm | 24/05/11

      @acotrel

      Exactly, and that’s why TChong is right. As with Hanson, only the Coalition would lose votes to Katter.

    • TChong says:

      04:16pm | 24/05/11

      Thanks Joan !
      Robert , simmer down, I live not far from Windsor territoy, so you are wrong,  besides WTF you talking about ?
      If you really believe that the agricultrural sector is going to somehow
      disapear, then I would suggest u know didly.
      Patsy - again wrong.  I dont have any probs with Buying Australian, and we (family) are customers of all things local.
      Had yur Pauline moment, wrapped in an Oz flag towel?
      Good ! I’m glad thats out the way .

    • Rick says:

      04:40pm | 24/05/11

      Robert Smissen,
      paddle faster I hear banjos

    • Gregg says:

      08:05am | 24/05/11

      Yes Ant, you could say it’s hats off to the wild one a little but the demise of our economy and reliance on resources income being spread about whilst we become a nation of importers has been going on for quite some time so it’s not real new news.

      The problems with Bob’s theory on what to do with resources are not only power and water but also reflected by the key words in Erick’s God Fearing poem and that’s the Market Place.

      Australia’s next great challenge is not going to be just political power but with many ageing power stations, where is base load power going to come from and without a reliable supply we can expect to see further demise of industries and the question raised of not just where to house asylum seekers and refugees but where will a lot more people be working.

      The super resources and carbon taxes are another matter.

    • Zaf says:

      08:09am | 24/05/11

      I dont suppose Bob Katter talked about WHY there was a decline in manufacturing jobs or in certain kinds of agriculture over the last couple of decades.  Because that’s probably a first step in figuring out whether these are necessarily good or bad things.  Given our current unemployment level and all.

      As for the Party, bbq might be generous and the grog plentiful, but the conversation would, I fear, be sadly lacking.

    • austin 3:16 says:

      11:24am | 24/05/11

      Dutch disease

    • Phil says:

      08:19am | 24/05/11

      As a liberal voter I like Bob Katter. He speaks with passion and I dont believe he can be bought. In Joe’s QLD state government he got things done, hey maybe not the conventional way, but he got things done. He is a can do man. The Nats should invite him back to be leader and a future deputy PM. That would make the next election an even bigger wipeout for the red herring.

      Once in give him Kevin Rudds OS bribe budget and get the country moving in areas which he will be able to do.

      As much as I like Barnaby Joyce, his methods of conveying what are good points lacks. Bob Katter is Barnaby but with better communication skills.

    • Mark says:

      02:35pm | 24/05/11

      @Phil

      “Bob Katter is Barnaby but with better communication skills.”

      Talk about damning with faint praise. You sure know how to hurt a guy, Phil.

    • Seamus says:

      08:23am | 24/05/11

      Love him or hate him, we have here a politician who actually ‘does give a stuff,’ which can be said for very few of his colleagues in Federal Parliament.

      I am in Bob’s electorate and find him to be hard working and dedicated to his constituents and the far north.

      Despite his idiosyncracies, he is not going to get rolled any time soon.

    • Later Than You Think says:

      08:25am | 24/05/11

      Rather a Mad Hatter than Little Red Riding Hood in sheep’s clothing or The Rabbit in an abbott’s robe of finery and foolishness.  There’s a lot of good sense hidden under Katter’s hat - time to listen to him before it’s too late.  But with little manufacturing done in Austraia now, the death knoll may already be with us.

    • Jay-ded says:

      08:29am | 24/05/11

      Those quaint rural folk are so naïve, aren’t they?

      Anthony, can you be more condescending if you tried?  I’d rather have pollies like Katter than Julia any day.  At least he’s attempting to help his electorate.  What have the rest of the pollies done - no really, what have they achieved?

    • SimpleSimon says:

      09:18am | 24/05/11

      Sarcasm detection fail?

    • Jay-ded says:

      10:22am | 24/05/11

      Well you do know what they say about sarcasm don’t you….

    • acotrel says:

      07:13am | 25/05/11

      I love being described as ‘quaint’!  I’m seriously thinking of voting for an ALP biassed independent at the next election!

    • Brian says:

      08:34am | 24/05/11

      A lot of Bob’s critics should be aware that he has not deviated from this policy over the years. It is unfortunate that he is on the right track and most people don’t want to take any notice. Just look at all the quality agricultural land being overrun by mines, coal seam gas projects, not to mention thousands of blocks of bricks and mortar. As the population expands we become less productive.
      But, as loyal as you are to the bush, Bob, please don’t start another political party.

    • Jim says:

      09:03am | 24/05/11

      Bob loyal to the bush???? Come on!!!! If he had it his way there would be no agricultural land…just look at what his bunch of fracktards have done in northern australia.

    • Seanr says:

      08:40am | 24/05/11

      Thankfully I’m in the Leichhardt electorate not Kennedy because Katter doesn’t impress me. He seems to be a well meaning bloke with convictions and a genuine interest in getting the best for his electorate. However the whole maverick cowboy thing is overdone and I seriously doubt he has managed to get much for the people of Kennedy. As an independent he just doesn’t matter when funding is handed out, as much as he is good for media sound bites

    • fairsfair says:

      10:29am | 24/05/11

      Say it isn’t so Sean!

      He is pretty good. I met him last year at a community event and he was a bit confronting, but I later realised that he was just genuine - you don’t see that much any more. Looks you right in the eye, sharkes your hand pretty hard and repeats your name a lot when you are talking to him.

      I don’t think that you hear a lot about what he does for Kennedy because the electorate is so sparcely populated. A lot of stuff he achieves may be for just one or a couple of cattle stations etc. I think the maverick cowboy thing that you mention is just perpetuated by the media as although he took his hat off when he was chatting with me, I didn’t get any of that yeeha crap that a tiny part of me was expecting.

      I agree with you in terms of the independent lacking the ability to reap in the rewards, but it is at the very least consistent. It doesn’t happen in waves like a swinging seat does and it is never going to go to Labor.

      In 2003 when my father had his stroke and after he returned home to Cairns from about 4 months hospital and rehab in Townsville my parents were on the verge of losing everything. My father worked for himself so he had no employee benefits and their accident/life insurance policy had limited coverage for a stroke. Once that money ran out (they spent most of it on his treatment as the hospital refused futher OT/Physio help) they were facing losing their house and turned to Centrelink. After about two months of visiting the various offices, on the phone they were getting nowhere. One afternoon my father rang Bob Katter’s office expecting to speak to his secretary to see if she could offer some advice. He picked up his own phone. He chatted to my dad for about half an hour and the next morning Centrelink rang my parents and resolved it for them almost immediately. A couple months later he arrived at my parents house in his old landcuiser for a yarn. My dad didn’t know him from a bar of soap prior to that. I was gobsmacked. I honestly could not see Jim Turnour or Warren Entsch doing that, ever.

    • Seanr says:

      11:52am | 24/05/11

      Don’t get me wrong ff, he seems like a decent guy and the example of your father (BTW I hope your family’s situation has improved) shows that personal approach. My issue is with the ‘big ticket’ items that because he is seen as a right wing maverick independent, the major parties don’t see a need to offer to Kennedy.

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      12:20pm | 24/05/11

      Fairsfair, WOW! ! ! ! What a tale, he must be 10 foot tall, you tale brought tears to my eyes. Katter is the last Aussie bloke

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      12:23pm | 24/05/11

      Seanr, what you are missing is that Bob wants there to be an Australia,after the big city types have sold off the minerals to the Chinese, otherwisw we’ll just be Narau, a big hole in the ground

    • fairsfair says:

      04:09pm | 24/05/11

      Thanks guys, we have managed to adjust our lives around it (none more than dad) but it is just one of those things. We have resigned ourselves to the reality that he will never get better, but he is alive, and he can function and that is all that matters. It was a funny one in that it has more severly affected his arm more than anything, so he essentially is missing an arm on top of all the other balance and strength issues that only being in control of half of your body brings. It destroyed his confidence and his ability to earn a living. Without the disability pension though, my parents would be renting somewhere. Their home is essentially their super (thanks to always having a business), so they acknowledge that they will eventually have to sell it and live of its value. I think that man saved my father’s life though. My dad had been through so much and if he had lost everything he owned on top of all of that I think he would have given up. I know it is an extremely personal opinion, but I think that says a lot about the man’s character.

      BobKat seems to pick his battles I reckon Sean. He is losing on behalf of the dairy farmers though and also the banana imports, but I don’t think those battles can be won. Australia seems to be ok with the fact that we will one day be drinking foreign milk. I have nothing against foreign milk per se, but not at the expense of the farmers at the top of the Gillies, who are reluctant to change (so you can understand why the don’t really see the point to an NBN) and you can’t blame them for that.

      Look at leighardt though. You have a first term Labor member who won in 2007 off a long seated Lib (who happened to retire). You would think that Labor would be keen to sink its teeth in and retain in 2010. They promised heaps and delivered nothing, especially in terms of the southern highway. It is that reason alone that I flipped JT the bird as I crawled past him in first gear while he was spruiking for votes in the peak hour traffic that he promised he would stop. I don’t think being in a party helps that much smile

    • Tubesteak says:

      08:49am | 24/05/11

      We do need to seriously think about the future of our economy and need some real micro and macro reform, however, Bob’s focus is wrong. He is way off and living in a world that existed decades ago.

      Economies centred on primary industries are for developing nations. Economies centred on secondary industries are for intermediate nations. Australia is a first world economy and therefore should focus on tertiary industries such as the professions and skills that requires deep specialisation.

      While we do need food to feed ourselves and enough manufacturing to cover the basics we should rely on things in which we have a comparative advantage. This isn’t manufacturing (our cost of labour is far too high to be a real competitor and no-one is going to be stupid enough to be convinced that Australian cars are as good as the Germans or Japanese) or primary industry. We cannot have a first world economy on third world basis.

      One thing Rudd did that was one of their best policies was to revive Paul Keating’s plan to turn Australia into a regional financial services hub. Whilst Singapore and Hong Kong may have beaten us to it we do have the ability to be a decent player in this area. Rudd did a few things on this and Gillard is carrying the baton, albeit slowly. We should be looking at other areas though to add a few more strings to the bow.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:38am | 24/05/11

      Tubesteak I agree with what you have said.

      My only issue is though that if you take away primary industry in Bob’s electorate (and many others) there is just sweet didly remaining. Their only other fallback is folksy tourism that attracts the grey nomads.

      There has been talk within Qld to decentralise public service roles from Brisbane to Cairns and other regional centres. The only issue is that to do so the who department has to be moved and people have to be paid insentives, relocation fees and higher wages. It is hardly economical. If our region did not have sugar, beef, dairy, mangoes, bananas etc - we would be a few hundred thousand people relying on the tourism industry. I just don’t see how we are to “wein” ourselves off primary industries if the shift is to happen.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:18am | 24/05/11

      apologies… I have a habit of spelling words that I put inside of inverted commas incorrectly… I will one day get used to touch typing. One day…

    • Tubesteak says:

      11:33am | 24/05/11

      The idea isn’t to get rid of primary industry. It’s just not to make it our sole focus for our economy or expect it to be one of our main export earners. We can’t ride on the sheep’s back anymore. We need primary industry to feed ourselves but we need other aspects of an economy to really grow ourselves.

      But don’t shy away from tourism. It is a brilliant earner in the good times. Many European nations wouldn’t survive without it. One thing about bigger infrastructure projects such as train lines would mean it would be easier for tourists to move around. Think fast trains from Brisbane to Cairns - might seem stupid and costly but it would really pay off. More tourists = more money.

      Don’t worry about touch-typing. I don’t do it and I get along pretty fine.

    • The Badger says:

      12:38pm | 24/05/11

      fairsfair
      The NBN can be just such an enabler.
      Where you work for many tasks is irrelevant.

      Personally, I like Katter and I think he is currently representative of the electorate he fronts for. Things are however changing and if as Tubesteak says the “focus on tertiary industries such as the professions and skills that requires deep specialisation” is the long term solution for FNQ, then Katter will rapidly find himself out of his depth.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      12:59pm | 24/05/11

      Badger

      the NBN *could* be an enabler, but it won’t be. 
       
      The workers themselves would doubtless rather be in a charming rural area like Wide Bay, Margaret River, Clare Valley or Golden Triangle instead of Logan, Gosnells, Elizabeth or Sydenham but it is management who make the call and they don’t want to leave Kangaroo Point, Dalkeith, Unley Park or Toorak.

      I could do my job a damn sight more efficiently from home; it just isn’t on the cards.

    • The Badger says:

      02:00pm | 24/05/11

      Tubesteak
      Sorry to hear about your “job” conditions.
      Unfortunately it doesn’t appear as if the NBN will do anything to remedy your location dependence. This can be driven by the nature of what you do, or how your “bosses” think.
      Many other industries can take advantage of the opportunities the NBN will present. The reduction in overhead alone that working from home or in a rural area presents should be more than enough to enable the transition from the beehive to a distributed network method of business.
      I believe there will be enough of these location independent job opportunities to help return families to the rural towns and centres that are in decline. Apparently the independents do as well.

    • Sam says:

      03:32pm | 24/05/11

      So Germany and Japan are “intermediate nations”?

    • Rick says:

      04:53pm | 24/05/11

      Tony of poorasistan you forgat to mention Pooraka mate who in their right mind would want to work there? While I think of it who would want to work and live there?

    • d says:

      08:53am | 24/05/11

      Free trade is what has ruined america and it will be the same here.

      We should bring back tarrifs on all imports and start making things here again.

      I fully agree with Bob that there is more money to be made if we could use our raw materials instead we are buying them back from china at 10x the price we sell for

    • Tubesteak says:

      10:27am | 24/05/11

      Stupid idea. We’ll just end up paying higher prices for locally made crap.

      Only smart idea is to play the game we are equipped to play.

    • St. Michael says:

      10:55am | 24/05/11

      America is actually still the world’s largest manufacturer.  The difference being that they no longer manufacture cheap crap on their own shores.  They still manufacture a very large proportion of the planet’s high technology and complex items.  Free trade actually built America, it didn’t ruin it.

      Bring back tariffs on imports and watch as Australia’s economy goes from secondary and tertiary decline into a fall that would put a plunging Wall Street stockbroker to shame.

      See, tariffs on imports is actually cutting off other countries’ noses to spite your own face - because when you tariff imports, other nations then impose retaliatory tariffs on your own country’s exports.  The best example of this was the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, out of the United States.  It came through in 1929.  Pop quiz: what major economic disaster happened in 1929 after it was instituted? I’ll give you a hint: it was the Great Depression, - and it mainly happened because the Act imposed punitive tariffs on America’s imports.  Every country then did the same back to the US.  International trade ground to a halt.  It took World War 2 for the world to come out of that one.

      The planet is even smaller now and most economies heavily dependent on international trade.  Arguing for tariffs now is even more myopic now than it was back in the twenties.

      Although, interestingly, I’d argue that unlike most of the civilised planet, we already have a set of tariffs in place: the award system, which despite a few spirited attempts at destroying it, still calls the shots on what most Australian workers get paid.  I call it a domestic tariff system since it’s imposed on all trade, foreign or domestic, and it’s set centrally by the government.  It’s also a big part of why we aren’t terribly competitive as a manufacturer and why we’re more or less stuck riding on the sheep’s, er, Andrew Forrest’s back.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      01:08pm | 24/05/11

      @St Michael- What a bunch of crap. Non tariff protective barriers between countries have actually increased over the past couple of decades. There is no level playing field. Never was and never will be. Economic rationalists can dream on about their ideal world, in the real world, trade barriers are still there despite the efforts of the Doha round of trade talks (a dismal failure by the way)

    • St. Michael says:

      01:35pm | 24/05/11

      “Non tariff protective barriers between countries have actually increased over the past couple of decades.”

      Source?
      And which countries, and what tariffs addressing which products?

    • jen says:

      04:24pm | 05/06/11

      2 true d..we have sold out so much of this country..our farmers are dissapearing..we are over governed..at least bob seems 2 want 2 keep australia and australians as we have always been, instead of cheap imports and this nonsense carbon tax crap

    • Reggie says:

      08:57am | 24/05/11

      This is a clue to the confusion within his party of choice when a hard-boiled old Westerner is driven to tears and mumblings about forming another party.  Or perhaps he’s just trying to put the wind up Tony for a stir. smile

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:17am | 24/05/11

      Just as longs as Bob Katter doesn’t spout off heresy like Joe Hockey did about taxing trusts as companies. The National Party will go ballistic again and the poor dears that use trusts as tax minimization vehicles will be in a panic….

      But seriously Bob Katter has a point. Primary Industries don’t nearly provide anywhere the number of jobs that Australia’s growing population requires. Only labor intensive sectors like manufacturing do as America is finding out to its dismay.

    • Steve Thompson says:

      10:05am | 24/05/11

      I watched Bob’s press conference and interviews yesterday but I still have no idea what he announced.

      At least when Julia Gillard makes an announcement, you know what it is that she’s announced, even if it has no detail and is completely unworkable.

    • The Badger says:

      10:44am | 24/05/11

      I read you comment and still have no idea how you can tell an announcement Julia Gillard makes is unworkable if it has no detail.
      Can you elaborate?
      Do you have mark’s dirty crystal ball?

    • Ben C says:

      02:37pm | 24/05/11

      @ The Badger

      The fact that there is no detail renders it unworkable.

    • The Badger says:

      03:17pm | 24/05/11

      Ben
      I’m going to the beach with my mates next weekend to catch some surf.
      Gonna be awesome 5 of us have agreed.
      Not sure who’s driving, where we’re staying or when we’re leaving, but it’s on.
      Oh wait, it’s unworkable because we haven’t finalised the details yet.
      Damn that Ben, not inviting him next time.

    • Ben C says:

      04:14pm | 24/05/11

      @ The Badger

      Big difference between your example and what Julia proposes - in fact, quite a few million differences, possibly billions. If Julia was as off the cuff in her proposals as you are with your surfing trip, then the whole nation will be on its knees.

    • michael j says:

      10:28am | 24/05/11

      Perhaps Katter is taking into account the Fracking of QLD farmland in what seems to be a uncontrolled experiment , will there really be no damage to the water table n good-farmland or will we end up with a waste land ?
      Net importer of food,when i went through Woolies the other day i saw cans of food from countries i had never even heard of,there also seems to be fresh fruit n veggies from other countries as well?
      IF we aren’t reliant on imported food yet it may not be long,,,

    • Shifter says:

      01:37pm | 24/05/11

      Quesiton is, if they are imported… how fresh are they?

    • michael j says:

      02:26pm | 24/05/11

      @Shifter-good point,some overseas pork products we get have been in cold storage for up to 3 years, yummy, and our farmers can not make ends meet,? and end up selling at a loss?

    • Lapunu says:

      10:29am | 24/05/11

      As,one of Bob’s constituents (in an area where we don’t see much of him) I was more interested in and aligned with his minor rant about the controls placed on all forms of life and enjoyment in Qld.  As he pointed out, you can’t even boil the billy without getting a permit in Qld, and he is right to bring this to attention.  The obsession by governments, both Federal and State, with controlling our lives is ridiculous and without reason.  e.g. Does anyone seriosly think even one smoker will quit because we make all the packets olive green without branding?
      Bob might like to look into the reason the Mission Beach Aquatic Festival was dumped due to costly controls destroying its feasibility.  Oh Boy!  There are so many of these controls we in Qld and Australia at large are suffering, we are becoming controlled by the political freaks that represent either nobody at all or only the minority freaks. 
      If Bob is serious about tackling the control push, he might even be forgiven by the Kennedy voters and get re-elected next time.

    • Steve wantok says:

      12:27pm | 24/05/11

      Em now Lapun. Yu Tok stret but but what to do? Society is made up as individuals but society changes and morphs like a single organism. It is hard for individuals to defy the changing trends. It is alarming to look back to your own youth to see how much personal freedoms that have been lost.

      My impression from the other side of the country is that Katter is unassailable electorally speaking. Is that not the case any more and what has he done that needs forgiving?

      Lukim

    • Lapun says:

      05:42pm | 24/05/11

      Steve Wantok - Apinun tru.  Bob is not unassailable but will be on shaky ground next time round.  His electorate is bikpela moa iet but it also carries through to the coastal areas where I am and he is not very popular around here any more.  Tasol sopos they put up some longlong against him he may still scrape home.  Gutpela yumi toktok.
      Lukim yu bihain

    • ;o) says:

      10:53am | 24/05/11

      Bob is talking a language many of you have forgotten or do not know, he is talking as a proud Australian, at least he is having a go, in suggesting ways to rebuild this nation, he is 100% right in suggesting we need to get back to basics, to rebuild the manufacturing and agriculture sectors. We as a nation in time are doomed if we do not improve our domestic base. Its time our votes counted and things got done for our nation’s and children’s future.

    • Steve says:

      01:01pm | 24/05/11

      “if this government cannot get the adjustment , get manafacturing going again and keep moderate wage outcomes and a sensible economic policy, then Australia is basically done for. we will end up being a third rate economy…a banana republic”
      Paul Keating 14 May 1986.

      Did we get manafacturing up or did we become a mining republic? The present Governments plan for our future is a mining tax. We will have too many eggs in one basket - what happens if the mining slow down?

      Last week many people quite correctly spoke out against middle class reliance on welfare. Going forward whole states will become dependant on mining tax welfare derived from WA and Qld.

      A mining tax should be a bonus and put into development of other industries. Even before it has come into place we are reliant on it to balance the budget.

    • St. Michael says:

      01:38pm | 24/05/11

      @ Steve: and what you tax, you discourage.  This is a central plank of the government’s thinking for its excises on tobacco.  Why exactly they want to do it to the only industry sector keeping Australia’s economy afloat boggles my mind.

    • Steve says:

      02:43pm | 24/05/11

      Hi St. Michael. Yes I agree with you. My post is not an argument for the proposed mining tax. Rather if we have one it’s about what the funds are used for.

      Do we use it to encourage waste and welfare because the MRRT is a budget panacea or is it to be used to establish industries to fall back on when the mining cycle turns to bust from the present boom.

      You know the thing I find most disttasteful about the mining tax is that it is retrospective. I would have much less issue with it if it was applied to new mines that have not established themselves. I don’t ambush people in my business affairs and I don’t expect my government to do it either.

      A prospective mining tax could dovetail well into a stable population policy. Less mines would open but we would need less because we don’t have the population growth. We could then extend the life of mining in Australia.

    • St. Michael says:

      03:19pm | 24/05/11

      @ Steve: I was being complementary (and complimentary, too! wink ).  In this country we seem to hate the very idea of diversifying the economy to include support for manufacturing industries.  I really don’t see much difference between the way we’re currently running things and riding on the sheep’s back.

      Still, retrospectivity is anathema whether it’s legally or financially (or both).  The very fact the government is discussing it, I would argue, is hurting additional mining projects, because business, more than consumers, tends to hold back on investment while things are uncertain.  This is probably why the Gillard government keeps getting caned from business—because it refuses to announce anything with real certainty.  Good or bad, if Gillard had said “$40 on carbon, that’s what we’re going to do” then at least business could manage its affairs and make investments to take account of it.  The fact she refuses to be specific about anything in the carbon tax scheme is actually doing more harm than good to business, since nobody can tell exactly what the government’s going to do.

      Having said that, I’m uncertain whether lowering population growth is necessarily the right way to go.  Mainly because of the relative age of that population, which is to say, on balance heading towards retirement or already retired.  You need more taxpayers to support the pension load ... or alternatively, you take away or tighten up the age pension significantly.

    • Steve says:

      04:59pm | 24/05/11

      Yes St. Michael. I realised your position on the MRRT but I thought my post might not make my position clear and wanted to clarify it.

      You know there are some very good articles on myths about reducing population growth and the diminishing taxpayer base. Family sizes have been decreasing from 10 or more 100 years ago to the present levels. Huge amounts of immigration were not required in order to integrate these reductions. One final fairly small reduction to zero growth would only be a little speed bump in our economy and thereafter we would have generations of equal size. Otherwise we are forever chasing our tail.

      On the matter of tarrifs and the depression i will have to check but I think the catalyst for the depression was the collapse of credit after about 10,000 banks went broke in the USA. Sure trade restrictions and Govt tightening of fiscal policy made it worse but i don’t think were the triggers as such.

    • St. Michael says:

      11:28pm | 24/05/11

      @ Steve: “On the matter of tarrifs and the depression i will have to check but I think the catalyst for the depression was the collapse of credit after about 10,000 banks went broke in the USA. Sure trade restrictions and Govt tightening of fiscal policy made it worse but i don’t think were the triggers as such.”

      There do seem to have been a confluence of factors which triggered the Great Depression.  And I have to concede that most economists seem to agree nobody really knows exactly what causes inflation or deflation.

      On some further research, it turns out the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act actually postdated the October 1929 crash by at least three months or more.  On the other hand, its intended effect was well-known ahead of the crash, and the uncertainty it brought on with speculation about what its effects would be is a strong candidate for setting off the ‘29 crash.

      It is a matter of historical record, though, that literally a thousand economists all begged the President not to sign the Act through at the time.  This even including a last minute telegram from the head of GM Europe telling him it would cause massive isolation and depression—which it did since the bill was signed.

      Whilst my thesis that the Act caused the Great Depression is probably a bit off in that most people equate October 1929 with its beginning, it doesn’t affect the proposition throwing tariffs up exacerbated things to a horrible extent.  The retaliatory action by other countries is a matter of record; Switzerland, as an example, outright banned the import of *any* American goods.  As I said; tariffs cut off importers’ noses to spite exporters’ faces.

    • Shawn says:

      11:06am | 24/05/11

      Nice article, the stuff you have been writing is really enjoyable lately. Keep up the good work.

    • Mining man says:

      12:54pm | 24/05/11

      You state “The guts of his argument is that we mine ore and ship it overseas, rather than reaping the profits of mineral processing, which is much more lucrative.”

      This statement is incorrect as mining is more profitable than minerals processing. Look at the earnings of BHP and RIO and compare that to Steel or Car companies. Look at the EBIT margins or the ROIC. The fact is, all the profit margin at the moment in a car goes to the miners, not the steel makers or the car companies. Why not let stupid overseas investors subsidise our livelihood by sending back our expensive iron ore upgraded to cheap cars?

    • S.L says:

      01:24pm | 24/05/11

      I’m yet to hear Bob Katter sling an intelegent sentence together! The federal electorate of Kennedy can keep him!

    • Way too easy says:

      02:01pm | 24/05/11

      Get back to us when you can spell “intelligent”.

    • RyaN says:

      03:00pm | 24/05/11

      Bring on that education revolution!

    • S.L says:

      03:21pm | 24/05/11

      So what if I can’t spell? I’m not a federal politician…...........

    • Pete says:

      01:24pm | 24/05/11

      It’s a nice idea, us making stuff again in Australia. Unfortunately, unlike Germany etc. we have a neanderthal manufacturing mindset with utterly hopeless managers. Anti-intellectual tradies are never going to set up a competitive manufacturing base in this country.

    • The realist says:

      02:36pm | 24/05/11

      I’m the publicist, organiser, treasurer, and secretary of the New Improved Political Party called Bob Katter and the Bobkats. We welcome all aspiring members and remind everyone that the only membership requirements are an Akubra hat and a low IQ. Of course despite our credo being ‘Love thy neighbour’ we don’t welcome homosexuals nor Trade Union officials, and we try to discourage University graduates.
      We were going to call ourselves the ‘Country Regions Australia Party’ but when we drew the party flag it just spelt CRAP, so we gave that away. BTW, while I’m on the subject of party names, one of our new members put forward “The Confederate Party”, but when Bob heard it he vetoed it immediately. “I’ve read what the Union mob did to the last lot!”, he said.
      Any further info can be gained by contacting me at P.O. box 3, Feecy’s Creek Qld. Please address all mail, ” Attention Pauline H.”  (All correspondence is confidential, as are contributions, whether they are cash, sheep, cattle, geese, or any other legal tender). Thank you, Australia.

    • Steve says:

      03:19pm | 24/05/11

      You are right. You can’t establish an alternative party based on commonsense and policies that have broad appeal. People who like commonsense policy are difficult to prise away from the major 2 parties.

      To establish an alternaitive party you need leftist kooky, sounds good in theory policy that appeals to that 10% - 15% of the electorate that consider themselves to be the intelectual minority and would never be seen dead voting for a major party. You need a special party for special people. A little piece of turf on the high moral ground where you can lord it over your intelectual inferiors whilst maintaining a compassionate stance.

    • S.L says:

      03:23pm | 24/05/11

      Very Good!

    • jim morris says:

      02:59pm | 24/05/11

      The outstanding thing about Bob Katter is his sincerity. Outstanding because almost every other Australian politician is so tangled up in their memorised strung-together combinations of cliches they amount to nothing more than displays of self-importance and desperate ambition.
      Katter is no Einstein but Q&A has shown us that there aren’t many intelligent people in public life, at all.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      06:43pm | 24/05/11

      Bob Katter is another Queensland Pollie in the Right Wing Populist tradition.

      *Ordinary versus Elite
      *Mainstream versus Special Interest

      This same Populist Rhetoric could be seen in Sir Joh (1968-1987) and Pauline Hanson (1996-1998)

      Queensland has a long right wing populist tradition.

      But I say Bring it on!!... Bob Katter and his “new party” will split the LNP Vote . Making Anna Bligh in the up coming State election hold power. YES!!!!!

    • Bikinis on Top says:

      08:42pm | 24/05/11

      On September 7 2011, Independent MP Bob Katter supported the Liberals and Tony Abbott. He has struggled for relevance ever since.

    • Steve says:

      12:15pm | 25/05/11

      Well at least we know that the world will not have ended by then.

    • bikinis on top says:

      08:49pm | 24/05/11

      Your comment:Cracker Night May 24 needs Katter Fireworks and Crackers!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter