BACK in 2007, Kevin Rudd said that if we elected him as prime minister, he would stop the slaughter of whales.

A Lindsay cartoon from the 2007 election campaign

And it wasn’t just earnest young lefties who took off their Save the Whales T-shirts and replaced them for a time with a red, white and blue Kevin 07 design.

No, Mr Rudd’s pledge to end ``commercial’’ whaling appealed across the political spectrum, young and old, progressive, conservative, as advancing technology meant Australians were bombarded with real-time images of dying whales writhing in agony as they were hauled at the end of a harpoon line through blood-stained seas.

And he was pretty clear about it too, our prime ministerial hopeful.

``Take Japan to international courts such as the Court of Justice or to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to end the slaughter of whales,’’ he pledged in a statement with former environment spokesman Anthony Albanese - prior to the 2007 federal election.

That was then. Now, it seems Australia can’t do enough for the Japanese Government.

Soon after being elected, Mr Rudd bowed to political pragmatism and announced that he and the Japanese had ``agreed to disagree’’ on the issue of whaling.

This smoothed the choppy waters of international diplomacy, as Japan was feeling very much the third wheel in Mr Rudd’s love affair with China.

But it created a serious political problem at home - a problem made worse by the co-operation of our federal agencies.

The Australian Federal Police raided protest ships when they docked for refuelling in Hobart last summer after a complaint from the Japanese embassy.

This year, our airports played host to Japanese spy planes, which were dispatched to track the protest ships.

And our federal immigration department cracked down on the leader of the international whaling protest fleet, Captain Paul Watson, putting him on a tighter visa restrictions.

Fair shake of the soy sauce bottle, Mr Rudd.

Whose side are you on?

The Japanese call their annual slaughter of about 1000 whales in Antarctic waters a cull for `scientific’’ purposes.

Australia’s description is politely vague - our Government calls it ``commercial whaling’‘.

But let’s be honest, this is fishing - albeit it on a grand scale - with whale meat destined for Japanese dinner tables. A super-sized, high-stakes equivalent of pulling in a few flatties from the bay to cook on the barbie that night, using harpoons and satellite tracking equipment instead of a handline and few bits of bacon for bait.

On a trip to Japan in 2007, I saw whale meat for sale in the Tokyo fish market, and photographed it before being chased away by a stall-holder well aware of western sensitivities to eating whale meat.

This is a cultural clash. Westerners love whales. We give them names and make movies about them (think Free Willy).

We record their sounds and produce boring CDs of whale music to listen to - and people actually buy them.

The Japanese, and other whaling countries such as Norway and Iceland love them, too.

They love to eat them and don’t see why this tradition should be stopped by the sensitivities of predominantly western nations.

It’s almost the equivalent of the outrage Australia generates when we shoot and eat kangaroos.

But there’s a significant difference: kangaroos are in plague proportion and need to be culled.

Whales are recognised by almost every country on earth as being endangered and in need of protection.

From a more hard-headed view-point, the protest fleet, run by the Sea Shepherd organisation, has won the public relations battle over whaling hands-down.

For six years, this group of committed environmentalists has taken to the southern ocean every summer in a collection of futuristic-looking boats which look to have come straight from a movie set.

The Ady Gil, wrecked last week in a collision with a Japanese whaler, was a $1.5 million hi-tech trimaran that looked like something Batman and Robin would have deployed. Pow! Great pictures, guaranteed front-page coverage.

Yet another point scored by Sea Shepherd in the public relations war.

Young, passionate and technology-savvy, these extreme environmentalists have made sure the world knows exactly what is happening more than 1000km south of Tasmania.

This year the Japanese have given themselves a permit to take (let’s be honest: kill) 935 minke whales and 50 larger whales.

Mr Rudd could make himself an international hero - simply by keeping his promise.

74 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • davido says:

      06:20am | 10/01/10

      The reason non government organisations such as Sea sheppard are needed are because it is impossible for governments to address these types of issues.

      And I don’t think this is about a cultural clash. Norway, Iceland and others have also extra-legally killed whales for commercial reasons. As a planet, the world decided to protect these amazing creatures and some countries seek to flout international norms.

      If japan really does kill whales for non-commercial reasons then they should be made to dispose of the whale meat or give it away for free.

    • Nigel says:

      06:45am | 10/01/10

      Rudd ... keep a promise.  Ha ... dream on! His government is a reflection of the NSW government that has effectively duped a large section of the population and has left a legacy of corruption, mismanagement and lies.  Rudd will win the next election and possibly the one after that but I dread what sort of a mess they will leave. Their failure to deliver on promises made about grocery prices, fuel prices, whale preservation, water conservation, CO2 abatement, illegal immigration, hospital take-overs and education revolutions exposes them as the con-men that they are.

    • Deliah says:

      07:09am | 10/01/10

      The whaling issue should be giving Kevin Rudd sleepless nights. It transcends the political divide and has many votes. As things stand the opposition’s Greg Hunt is gaining a lot of traction with his statements re: sending a ship and instigating legal action.

      The promise to end the slaughter of whales in the Southern Ocean Sanctuary is one that Kevin Rudd must keep. If not he will experience the fury of the voters including in his own seat. The government’s actions in actually supporting the whale slaughterers is gutless, hypocritical and absolutely shameful.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:28am | 10/01/10

      Commercial realitities took over, nothing new.
      Commercial realities let the Howard govt give a nod and a wink to 300 million in bribes for wheat, remember ?, the AWB scandal DURING the Iraq wars, no one has ever being held accountable for.
      Nothing could be funnier than the Lib hypocrasy on this issue. When Rudd first raised the issue, varios Libs were complaining how the Japanese were offended.
      Now the Libs are Sea Shepherd supporting greenies, LOL.
      The Japanese will simply ignore any legal action.
      The spy flights were done by a private company, not the Japanese govt.
      As for the promise, maybe Rudd is simply using the Howard doctrine of
      “Core and Non Core” promises.

    • Bruce says:

      07:36am | 10/01/10

      This issue of stopping the Japanese whaling was always going to be a tough one. I believe the real issue here is politicians “promises”. They will say and over promise, exagerate and lie, on issues they know they can not fullfill, but they still do it.  All political parties a guilty of this. BUT we believe them, and fall for it every time. The public has a short memory and so we do not hold them to account. The problem of politicians lying and feeding us BS, is really in the hands of voters.

    • Heléna says:

      07:54am | 10/01/10

      a promise like so many others that he could never keep - and more fool the people who voted for him
      I sincerely hope that he is not re-elected

    • Bianca Vincent says:

      07:58am | 10/01/10

      Rudd is the biggest fraud in Australias political history. He lied his way into winning the last election, I just hope Australians wake up at the next election and don’t vote for this phoney. I am seriously annoyed at this man for tricking me into voting for him, with all his pre election promises which have amounted to nothing more than a bunch of lies. He’s an arrogant egomaniac and deserves to be thrown out as Prime Minister of Australia.

    • Russell says:

      08:02am | 10/01/10

      You recognise that the emotional reaction against whaling has its basis in unacknowledged cultural difficulties and hypocrisy, yet you urge our government to butt heads with Japan about it, on behalf of all Australians?

      Why????

      “Whales are recognised by almost every country on earth as being endangered.” 

      First of all, I would prefer not to consider as authoritative the view of a “country”, which amounts to nothing more than a opinion of a ruling politician, informed by the ballot box.

      Secondly, there are many species of whales. Virtually ALL of Japan’s current antarctic take is Minkes, and these are not recognised by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature as endangered or threatened. They are at the lowest possible assessment, “Least Concern”.

      The only people who have any right to object to whaling are vegans, and even those ought not to be pushing the Australian government to take on their extremist views.

    • Marie says:

      08:22am | 10/01/10

      There is a political apologist amongst us. Responses are now predictable. Would be great if this person could actually argue the point !

    • Mick says:

      08:31am | 10/01/10

      Minke, Humpback and Southern Right Whales are not endangered in anyway.  They are listed in the “Least Concerned” category.  This category contains such endangered animals as Cane Toad, Cows, Humans and Cockroaches.

      Some whales are critically endangered and should not be hunted.  But those three species are in no danger at all and a sustainable harvest can quite easily be maintained.

      If you want to argue to end whaling on emotional grounds, go for it… but don’t use the endangered arguement.  It is an outright lie.

    • Deliah says:

      08:44am | 10/01/10

      @ T Chong. I would not be so dismissive about legal action. If Japan wants to be perceived as part of the international community and is a signatory to the international court, ignoring it’s findings is something they could ill afford to do. If the case is heard in The International Court of Justice in the Hague, remember it is part of the UN.

      Some years ago France was taken to the International Court by NZ and Australia re: nuclear testing in the Pacific. At the time France said they would ignore the court’s findings. However, they did eventually stop detonating their nuclear bombs.

      There are similarities between the French nuclear testing issue and that of whaling. Both generates passion and support in the electorate. However how these issues were handled by the respective leaders demonstrates a stark difference. In NZ politicians boarded a navy frigate which was sent to the testing zone in protest. The leader PM David Lange was principled, brave and knew how to keep a promise. What a contrast to the “do nothing”  hypocritical Rudd.

    • Maureen says:

      08:49am | 10/01/10

      Not seeing or hearing Rudd since Copenhagen has been such a relief, I wish he would just stay on permanent holiday. A drovers dog would make a better and more credible Prime Minister. I’m sick and tired of all his broken promises and I no longer believe a word he says. He’s a fake!

    • Q.E.D. says:

      08:53am | 10/01/10

      T. Chong 08:28

      Surprise, surprise. Chong goes for the ex-government’s throat and glosses over Rudd’s lies.

      Boring, Chong.

    • Lenny says:

      09:06am | 10/01/10

      Rudds answer to everything seems to be to throw money at it. If that doesn’t work, he changes focus to something else like binge drinking or executive salaries is the latest. No doubt he will have something else up his sleeve when he comes back from hols to take focus off the whaling issue too. He’s a sad excuse of a PM. He thinks he’s been clever so far with his polls being so high, but I hope Aussies will wake up before the next election and vote him out.

    • Max Power says:

      09:14am | 10/01/10

      Well done T.Chong. Yet another post refering to the past. Rudd is in power not Howard, your constant defence of Rudd by referring back to Howard is Ruddiculous. No one cares about what Howard did or didn’t do, he is no longer in power. Rudd promised the Navy and RAAF would collect evidence for a legal challenge against Japan. He never sent the RAAF or the Navy and won’t take Japan to court. Your hero is a jellyfish, promises the world delivers nothing. The Rudd govt is in power, we will judge him on his actions and performance and what he promised. Rudd is a failure, and by the ALP and it’s hacks constant defence of Rudd by comparing him to Howard proves it. By trying to divert scrutiny of Rudd by referring to Howard proves Rudd is a failure. But keep going Chong, keep defending Rudd’s failures by comparing him to Howard, all it does is prove Rudd is failing. But really if you want to compare Rudd to leaders of the past, a more fitting comparison would be Whitlam. It is no surprise that Rudd and Labor have no idea and have bankrupted the country and broken every promise, after all the govt is made up of 70% union hacks who have no ability or no idea, except for how to bully, lie, intimidate and feather their nests with other peoples money.

    • Ricky says:

      09:25am | 10/01/10

      Rudd is a narcisist & a liar.This is just one more thing in a growing list of failures.Personally i think he is a huge liability to Australias future.

    • Cuppa says:

      09:32am | 10/01/10

      So T. Chong, can you list me a few of the ‘promises’ (i use the term loosely) that Rudd has kept?Or even anything that he has achieved?(besides writing a kids book)?Anything…?Its scary to think that there are still fools like you out there that think this useless prime minister is doing a good job….

    • Biff says:

      09:35am | 10/01/10

      Politicians have a habit of promising everything to everybody. Someone once said that if politicians knew that they had cannibals as constituents they would feed them missionaries. Every day our politicians reinforce that statement.

      Maybe the solution to the whaling issue is for Mr Rudd to appoint a ‘Whale Commissioner’. He or she could be set up alongside the Petrol Commissioner and the Grocery Price Commissioner and they could take turns at watching petrol, groceries, and whales.

    • WHR says:

      09:53am | 10/01/10

      Since when do we need Sea Shepard? Since when do we ever need any type of terrorism? It is clear that they are in fact terrorists and they should be brought to justice as such.

      They attempt to create fear on the seas and back at home, they are ideological with the fervour of the most extreme of religious fundamentalists and they deliberately target, disregard the safety of individuals who are non combatants.

    • Kel says:

      09:55am | 10/01/10

      T Chong,

      I have seen your posts on other articles and your argument continues to point out the short comings of the previous government. The fact is, they are no longer in power, because they to did not deliver what the australian population wanted.

      The labour government were voted in because of their election promises, which they have not delivered.

      I voted for labour, in majority, for his election promise to stop whaling in Antarctica, imagine my bitter disappointment…..

      Regardless of what promises the previous government broke, the labour government have a lot to answer for their broken promises this election term - This is why it is so important that the SS and crew are willing to stand up, what our goverment will not , and save the inhumane slaughter of the whales.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      10:25am | 10/01/10

      Agree with this article and Davido’s comments above as well.  As for my own comments, if I hear Julia Gillard mention once more about “going through the diplomatic process” I’ll scream.  At this rate they’ll be going on, and on, and on…etc. and in the meantime exactly NOTHING will be done.  It’s unforgivable.  I am also very uncomfortable about the idea of Japanese “escort”/“security” vessels coming so close (1,000kms is it?) to Australian waters.  Shame on you Labor, shame, shame, shame.

    • Minke whales are not endangered says:

      10:51am | 10/01/10

      “Whales are recognised by almost every country on earth as being endangered and in need of protection.”
      Sorry, minke whales are NOT endangered but thriving , to quote Tim Flannery “they are like rabbits in the ocean”
      I still dont get why people get so upset about Japans whaling and could not care less about Norways whaling or say the 400,000 seal cull of Canada. A form of culrtural bigotry perhaps?
      As for how whales are slaughtered has anyone seen footage of how some of our live exports are slaughtered in the middle east.
      Emotion aside Rudd has no case anyway. The Japanese are not doing any thing legally wrong, contrary to popular belief its not “our waters”.

    • Deliah says:

      12:00pm | 10/01/10

      @ Minke whales are not endangered. You are wrong re: the legal position. What Japan is doing is illegal as per the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea. Also, the so called “research” has been found not to be such.

      It is not for nothing that international law experts have stated that Australia has good prospects for success if the government had the moral courage and fortitude to instigate court action. If Rudd is not proactive on the whaling issue, watch his poll numbers nose dive.

    • Petal says:

      12:24pm | 10/01/10

      It appears Rudd has been riding so high int he opinion polls he seems to think being PM is a breeze. All he has to do is promise the world and deliver nothing and Australians just love him. For the life of me I can not understand how he is so damn popular? Lets hope Tony Abbott can put a stop to that and get this turkey out of the PM’S chair. I also will sceam if I hear Julia Gillard say “we are going through the diplomatic proscess as we speak” one more time! And if Rudd comes back from holidays and says “this is a difficult situation” I’ll scream again! I have had enough of these guys, I wish there were an election tomorrow so I could give Abbott my vote. Labor won’t get my vote again as long as Rudd is Leader.

    • Sven Gali says:

      01:04pm | 10/01/10

      A cynical person might suggest that Sea Shepherd have actually been hired by the whalers for PR purposes, as their ‘respeck ma authoritah’ hypocrisy discredits their crusade moreso every day. Having said that, it’s still a win-win situation, as I’m sure “Whale Wars” is rating its socks off.

    • tim says:

      02:13pm | 10/01/10

      if u re-elect rudd then there is the risk u will get more broken promises and further inaction. so don’t vote for rudd and send a clear message that incompetence will not be accepted.

    • steve says:

      06:26pm | 10/01/10

      QED
      I think Chong was pointing out hypocritical reactions to the whaling issue.
      Not that long ago many of you were supporting Howard when he chose to turn a blind eye.
      Now you and the Liberal party want action. I think that pointedly demonstrates the hypocrisy of the Libs & their rusted on supporters.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      06:47pm | 10/01/10

      At least Rudd is making an attempt, albeit at the moment diplomatic, to deal with a sensitive and cultural sticking point with the Japanese government. I notice no other government dealing with Canada or Iceland or Japan for that matter. I would also hesitate to be to analytical of this government and it’s declarations at the last election as it has had other concerns to deal with. And for all those Howard huggers on this blog, let’s not forget that after twelve years of conservative government, Howard achieved nothing and God knows who his environmental minister was or even if he had one.

    • Q.E.D. says:

      07:18pm | 10/01/10

      @ steve :07:26pm | 10/01/10

      Steve, I agree with you. This is typical behaviour of our politicians. I don’t expect anything to change.

      What would be nice to see change, though, would be a different approach from Chong. All the “but Howard…blah, blah, blah” is just plain boring, and taken straight from Rudd’s Little Red Book of media tactics. grin

    • Q.E.D. says:

      07:27pm | 10/01/10

      @ Evan Findlay 07:47

      In relation to Rudd doing/not doing stuff, what gets me is I don’t know what he really stands for. So I don’t trust him. That’s made worse by the usual politician lies.

      This is made worse still by Peter Garrett and Julia Gillard phaffing on about all the hard work they are doing behind the seas, but evading questions on taking the whalers to court. It’s amateur hour!

      PS: I hear that the Ady Gil is still afloat and the whalers found arrows in the water near the accident site.

      PPS: And Sea Shepherd has left the Ady Gil spewing diesel into the sea!

    • S.L says:

      04:51am | 11/01/10

      Everybody who get’s into power in Australia promises to stop whaling or at least are sympathetic to the treehuggers riscking their lives in the Southern Ocean but to be honest how the hell does a government of Australia stop Japenese commercial whaling in international waters?
      The head treehugger of the Sea Shepheard is carrying on about all the illegal stuff the Whalers are up to only stopping short of blameing them for the JFK assasination. The fools are people who believe we can do something about it.
      I too am pro Whales and if anybody comes up with an ironclad solution to all this I will support it 100% but I think I’ll be waiting a while…...

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      05:56am | 11/01/10

      T chong, you are an absolute disgrace mate! Everything you write now is looked upon as crap. Your one sided opinions are no longer valid so please do us all a favor and give it up.

    • Vince says:

      06:54am | 11/01/10

      Eban Findlay - first are you related to T. Chong by any chance, and also could you explain to me where were Labor for that 12 years? No credible Leader, no credible policies let alone a credibile shadow Environment Minister.

    • watty says:

      07:02am | 11/01/10

      Good to knowKEL that you voted for LABOUR to put an end to whaling in the Antarctic.

      Just what is GORDON BROWN doing about it?

      Perhaps the GREENS should run spelling bees for you and your mates?

    • watty says:

      07:07am | 11/01/10

      “Yet another public relations victory” for a gang of seagoing thugs who have no rights or jurisdiction to stop Japanese whaling ships.

      Get the blinkers off Whinnett.There are more important human sufferings in Australia and other countries than the plight of a “nonthreatened” species of mammal

    • Daniel says:

      07:44am | 11/01/10

      The title of this article is so true really. If Rudd had taken action we wouldnt need them. however Tony Abbott and his party under howard had 10 years to sort this out and they were not interested either. None of them can be trusted the only party that has stuck to the same line is the Greens on this issue. We need a Greens government.

    • Liz says:

      08:04am | 11/01/10

      Yes we do.What are Garrett and Wong getting paid for, where are the promised results?
      We need to save the River Murray, get sensible with water and power use,house the homeless,stop whaleing and do something about our dental care system.Doctor recently refused a $80,000 pay increase saying it was not enough.This greed permeates the whole of life.We need to get real,do something to make the changes required maybbe that needs a Government that does all it promises.Haven’t mentioned the very large area of Indigenous housing,health and opportunity where things are moving too slowly.It can be fixed, it all can.

    • Grumpy Middle Aged Man says:

      08:14am | 11/01/10

      I may be a little short sighted here and let me say in the outset that I do not support the slaughter of whales, but how are we supposed to police international waters, which I was under the impression that these events happen in?  We can say what we like in reality, we’re a very small fish internationally and the Japanese will simply ignore us.  We sell them natural resources such as LPG so we don’t want to upset them or Aussies would have to enjoy that cheap LPG.
      Finally, in the news last week we saw an incident in which a protesters vessel was hit by a member of the whaling fleet, the two sides are blaming each other and to the best of my knowledge as a boat licence holder the Japanese vessel had the right of way and to counter the claims of the protesters that their vessel was disabled, it can clearly be seen to power up moments before being hit!  I don’t believe a word they’re saying I’m sorry, and if they’re lying about this then what else are they lying about?

    • Tamika says:

      08:18am | 11/01/10

      Evan Findlay - I think your confusing Howard huggers with Abbott huggers. Most people agree Howards days are over and no one wants to return to Howard as Leader. But now there is Abbott thank God, so when people don’t like Rudd it doesn’t automatically mean they are Howard huggers, more correctly means they prefer Abbott over Rudd.

    • Seamus says:

      08:31am | 11/01/10

      The Australian Government is not going to go sword rattling in International Courts about Japanese whaling nor the Chinese holding a Rio Tinto executive on what appears, largely, to be trumped up charges.  China and Japan represent two of our largest international trading partners and our present Government just does not have the intestinal fortitude to take either nation on.

    • BigBob says:

      09:04am | 11/01/10

      The Howard Government had many opportunities to act and did nothing. They were in power far longer than the Rudd Government has been. I doubt very much that big eared, hairy, Budgie smugglers wearer Tony Abbott, would be any more effective. They can’t even see issues on Global warming are far to serious to just ignore, so why would you think Whales swimming out of sight in the Anarctic, would get any higher precedence?
      I like most Aussies love those whales and it disturbs me to see them hunted and killed. Japan is a valued trading partner and we to step warily

    • Grant says:

      09:13am | 11/01/10

      Isn’t there about 800,000 minkes in the world.  Endangered smangered list…  have you even eaten whale meat?  Its sooo tasty.

      When I was in Norway, they would carve the meat into slices of about 1.5 to 2 cm thick; fry the steaks on both sides.  They sear the whale meat for about 4 - 5 minutes on each side.  The steaks taste best when they are medium rare, but should be warmed right through.  Served with a side of steamed vegetables.  Wallah !!

      In Japan when I had it, it was served on a plate with shitake mushrooms, white asparagus and miso dressing.

    • Sandy says:

      09:30am | 11/01/10

      It was RUDD who stood up on his podium and told Austalia HE would stop the whaling or he would take international court action against Japan as an election promise. This promise by Rudd has proved to be a lie, that’s the problem with the Rudd Government, happy to promise the impossible just to win votes. I know all Governments do it, but the Rudd Government have perfected this paractice, and it’s become unacceptable on the scale we are now seeing by his Government.

    • Deliah says:

      09:34am | 11/01/10

      @watty. Clearly you don’t understand the legal issues here. Both Australia and Japan recognise the compulsory jurisdiction of The International Court of Justice. Australia has a strong case as Japan is in breach of the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. Also, the evidence shows that their so called “research” is in fact commercial whaling.

      Make no mistake Japan’s actions are illegal and immoral. As for the court case in the Netherlands, I am betting the Sea Shepherd will win and Japan will have to pay damages.

    • Tim says:

      10:22am | 11/01/10

      Delilah,
      point me to the exact artical in the Whaling Convention that Japan is in breach of.
      I think you will find Article VIII allows Japan to take whales for scientific research. It would be a very difficult case to prove Japan’s whaling is commercial.
      And then even if the whaling was found to be commercial, Japan can just remove itself as a signatory to the convention.

    • Haggis says:

      10:40am | 11/01/10

      . . . All of the people some of the time, some of the people (including apparatchiks Chong et al) all of the time , but not all of the people all of the time. . . .  (mostly Abraham Lincoln)

    • bella starkey says:

      10:54am | 11/01/10

      I seriously dont understand why people give a shit about the dumb whales. how are they any more important than the tuna and salmon people are eating into extinction?

      I always get the feeling that white people have residual guilt about that whole almost-killing-off-the-whales-in-order-to-use-thier-blubber-for-soap thingy and can’t accept the fact that perhaps that whales have replenished thier population and the people who traditionally have used them as a food source can, in a sustainable manner.

      Also! why do people insist on trying to save beached whales. If the dumb fish want to die, let em. You dont see a bunch of wetsuit clad jerks trying to save the washed up bluebottles do you?

    • Bob says:

      10:59am | 11/01/10

      Ellen: Why do you insist on lying about the japanese hunting endangered whales? The species and quota they have set are in the “LEAST CONCERN” group according to scientific data from the IWC and other institution. In fact, Minke population is now higher than they were prior to commercial whaling in the 1800s.

      Many of you overstate japans research hunting. They can simply withdraw from the IWC and hunt commercially like Norway, Greenland or Iceland. I believe they approached this loophole to not intensify criticism in the past, but if you pressure them enough they will just withdraw and hunt as many as they want without IWC pressure on a low quota.

      Wrapping up: They hunt non-endangered whales in international waters and perfectly legal according to the IWC laws. Go ahead Ruddy, take them to the courts! I would love to see such a fiasco.

    • Anti-whaling Hypocrits says:

      11:24am | 11/01/10

      I have lots of questions for the author and supporters of the anti-whaling lobby group.  Do you support the cultivation and killing of millions of sheep, LAMBS, cows, CALVES, chickens, ducks, goats, kangaroos, pigs each year by Australians?  What is worse, the death of 1,000,000 chickens or 100 whales?  What about commerical fishing for all the different specifies of fish, crabs, lobsters etc?Oh, don’t forget the commercial battery hens for eggs etc?  Do you believe that this is a “humane” practise, that the animals do not suffer?  Isn’t it culturally arrogant to say its fine to eat the animals our culture traditionally eats but tell another culture they are not allowed to eat the animals they want to eat?  I find all of you to be utter hypocrits, you gorge yourself on the corpses of hundreds of animals a year, yet claim the moral high ground when it comes to whaling just because its a bigger animal and the slaughtering process is a highly visible media spectacle.  Please - go and visit a chicken slaughter house, abbotiors etc (you won’t see the killing going on there on the news, bad for our economy you see) and get a reality check.

    • Deliah says:

      11:27am | 11/01/10

      @Bob. You do realise the Japanese also intend killing Humpbacks (target of 50) which remain vulnerable and require protecting. I maintain Australia has a strong case against Japan as confirmed by international law experts. Japan recognises the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and would be bound by the findings.

      The question is will Rudd find the intestinal fortitude to do what he promised?

    • Tim says:

      11:51am | 11/01/10

      Delilah,
      Specifics please, or are you just basing your argument on unnamed International Law experts?

      From the International Whaling Convention
      Article VIII:
      Notwithstanding anything contained in this Convention any Contracting Government may grant to any of its nationals a special permit authorizing that national to kill, take and treat whales for purposes of scientific research subject to such restrictions as to number and subject to such other conditions as the Contracting Government thinks fit, and the killing, taking, and treating of whales in accordance with the provisions of this Article shall be exempt from the operation of this Convention. Each Contracting Government shall report at once to the Commission all such authorizations which it has granted. Each Contracting Government may at any time revoke any such special permit which it has granted.

      Article XI:
      Any Contracting Government may withdraw from this Convention on 30th June, of any year by giving notice on or before 1st January, of the same year to the depository Government, which upon receipt of such a notice shall at once communicate it to the other Contracting Governments. Any other Contracting Government may, in like manner, within one month of the receipt of a copy of such a notice from the depository Government give notice of withdrawal, so that the Convention shall cease to be in force on 30th June, of the same year with respect to the Government giving such notice of withdrawal.

      Even if we won the case, Japan can just withdraw from the convention and start commercial whaling.
      There is a reason that we haven’t taken Japan to court Delilah and intestinal fortitude has nothing to do with it.

    • CSallen says:

      11:56am | 11/01/10

      Is Peter Garrett allowed to comment on this or did he give up saving animals when he sold his soul?
      This is clearly an issue that needs to be addressed, and seeing as Rudd promised to, he should.
      Rudd seems so afraid of our Asian neighbours that he refuses steadfastly to do anything that may offend their delicate sensibilities.
      It’s time for him to take his so called ‘tough’ approach to the Japanese and stop the slaughter.
      I can’t believe that the Labor party wants to wait until 2011 to do anything about this issue- and Garrett had to deliver the message. He mustn’t get much sleep at night with his bed a burning

    • SLF says:

      12:08pm | 11/01/10

      If we let Japan kill all the whales there would be no need for the Sea Shepherd either. wink

      I have nothing against whales, but I really am apalled by the Cultural Imperialism we are dishing out over this one. Always amuses me when we do this because in Australia because we are so willing to take criticism from overseas about our cultural shortcomings of binge drinking, boganism, casual violence, racism etc etc.

      Maybe we should just let them get on with doing what they currently do in international waters and maybe focus our attentions on real crimes out there such as participation in illegal wars?

    • Deliah says:

      12:26pm | 11/01/10

      @Tim. You seem to miss the point. Japan is in breach of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling because their whale slaughter is not ‘scientific research.’ Rather the meat is put in cold storage in Japan where demand is declining. It is a scandal and Rudd is on notice to do the right thing. Intestinal fortitude is what this is about.

    • Save the Dugongs says:

      12:35pm | 11/01/10

      Dugongs populations are more at risk than Minke and Australia continues to cull away..
      The hypocrisy of some beggars belief.

    • Grant says:

      12:39pm | 11/01/10

      Damn it people…  why has no one read my comment that I posted earlier and said something… 

      I ate a whale…  that’s right I said it… 

      I ate whale and I liked it, and I’ll do it again…

      Oh by the way, here’s another recipe that I really enjoyed, and

      I think you might like too.

      Ingredients (for four persons):
      400 g whale meat
      40 g ginger
      100 ml soy sauce
      50 g sugar
      100 ml sake
      50 ml mirin (sweet sake)

      1) Cut 400 g of whale meat into cubes, and boil for 20 minutes.
      2) Boil 1000 ml of broth, and add 100 ml of soy sauce, 50 g of sugar, 100 ml of sake and 50 ml of mirin.
      3) Bring the mixture to the boil.
      4) Add the whale meat cubes and 40 g of sliced ginger, and simmer for an hour.

      Delectable !!!

      Here’s a link to another that you might like:
      http://www.worldwhalers.com/publications/recipes/seasheperds_pie.htm

    • Tim says:

      12:43pm | 11/01/10

      Deliah,
      did you even read what I wrote?
      Lets say we take Japan to the International court of justice over this issue. It would result in a protracted court case where the semantics of “scientific research” would be debated by both sides. It is not as you put it, a simple legal or illegal matter.
      Anyway, lets say we won this case and Japan’s whaling was deemed to be illegal.

      All Japan would have to do for its whaling to be deemed legal again would be to remove themselves from the whaling convention.

      There is no scandal, just a lot of emotional rhetoric from people like yourself that “WE” should “DO SOMETHING”.

    • Dern says:

      12:52pm | 11/01/10

      Interesting how the labor supports and the labor party keep bringing up howard and what his government did or didn’t do. frankly I don’t care about the past, howard may not have been the environmental champ we wanted but his government did do a lot of good and left us well off. rudd on the other hand has achieved nothing, and seems to be avoiding the issues. Healthcare, the economy and the environment all still not sorted out. how long has he been in government?

    • Steve says:

      12:53pm | 11/01/10

      What else did you think Rudd would do, did anyone really believe he would take Japan to court, Rudd in court, that wont happen, upset another potential vote for a UN job, if you were stupid enough to vote for Rudd you got what you deserved if you are serious next time vote for Abbott, the Greens will only pass preferences back to Rudd

    • Philip Crowley says:

      03:14pm | 11/01/10

      T.Chong… Firstly, may I politely suggest utilising a spell check prior to posting. Now to address your points, in order;

      If you hold a posteriori evidence of criminal activity you should provide this to the Australian Federal Police as a matter of urgency. Until such time as someone is convicted of a crime in this matter however, your allegations, delivered in print, are libelous.

      Secondly, you are quite wrong in asserting the Opposition are championing radical environmentalists. They are merely trying to hold the government to account over an unqualified promise to end whaling. That is the raison d’être of Oppositions, hence the name.

      To conclude, most rational Australians concern themselves with the performance of the government of the day. What happened under previous administrations is irrelevant, regardless of whether they are judged as ‘good’, or ‘bad’, such labels arising from a combination of one’s ideology and personal perspective.

      I am confused as to why you would hold out an example of something you despise in Howard as a suitable excuse of the Prime Ministers behaviour.

    • Deliah says:

      03:51pm | 11/01/10

      @Tim. May I remind you that the WE MUST DO SOMETHING brigade happens to be the majority of Australians who find the cruel slaughter of whales in breach of both international and domestic law utterly repugnant. The immorality of the actions of the Japanese and the gutlessness of the government is beyond dispute.

    • wolf says:

      04:05pm | 11/01/10

      Grant those recipies look great and I’d love to try them out.

      Do you know where I can get any whale meat in the Melbourne area?

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      04:28pm | 11/01/10

      KRudd Government is retaining it’s popularity because of it’s stance on whaling and many other issues precisely because it achieves nothing. Weasel words and bluster to placate the rusted on, actual result favouring those opposed. Witness Copenhagen report: Tried really, really, really hard, took 114; result = 0

      The exceptions are workplace relations and the deficit, both slow burn.

      Again, a repeat screen of Carr, 10 years of masterfull inactivity, electorally rewarded. M.Arbib knows how, and is sharing.

    • Cuppa says:

      04:43pm | 11/01/10

      Why is ok for Aboriginals to kill whatever they want, however they want(eg, spear, BIG rock/hardly humane)when ever they want because its their ‘cultural right’(and the greenys will defend that right until they are blue in the face), but the greenys wont recognise japans cultural heritage in regards to whale hunting?Its no more inhumane then spearing a roo hypocrites.PS. Has anybody seen our useless prime minister since that failed can of crap Copenhagen…?

    • D'oh says:

      05:30pm | 11/01/10

      @ Cuppa: “Has anybody seen our useless prime minister since that failed can of crap Copenhagen…? “

      no he has been to busy writing a kiddies book.

    • TC says:

      05:49pm | 11/01/10

      It seems to me that Rudd’s lack of willingness to act (in either direction) is a major problem. The absence of a position has meant that Paul Watson and his crew of misguided idiots are effectively representing Australia and in the meantime doing massive damage to our relationship with Japan.

      Im a bit ambivalent on the whaling issue if the species hunted arent endangered. It seems a that, as a food source, it’s in the best interests of everyone to manage the stock of whales and that need for a sustainable food source would protect the animals from extinction.

      I strongly believe,, however, that the Australian government should cease all support of Sea Shepherd and then make their case to cease whaling.

      Paul Shepherd is a media whore who is currently hijacking the leadership on this issue and in the process is declaring war on our major trading partner on our behalf. His agenda is his alone and he shouldnt be using Australia as a platform for his brand of zealotry.

      Human life takes precedence and as such Paul Watson needs to be held accountable for serial irresponsible endangerment at sea. He is not Australia, does not represent Australia but the absence of leadership is allowing him to use our country as a base for his idiocy and have effectively handed him the leadership.

      Expel or imprison Paul Watson first, remove the priacy issue and then tackle the issue of whaling. Do this before Watson has someone killed and completely enmeshes the country in a mess with no exit.

      Kev, it’s time to stop being such a ponce and put down the hairdryer. Be a man mate, have a position, stand up for it and stop throwing your staff behing you as you run away.

    • Tim says:

      06:23pm | 11/01/10

      Deliah,
      You should be a politician with your skill at dodging issues and refusal to respond to the arguments raised.
      You keep fighting the power, and dont let anything pesky, like a logical argument get in your way.

    • Bill says:

      09:15pm | 11/01/10

      Alas Tim,

      You are confusing Deliah as being someone who wants to have a logical dicussion with someone who wants to stand on their soapbox and espouse views that we are all expected to swallow without independent thought.  Logic won’t help you Tim, she’s not listening.

    • Deliah says:

      07:23am | 12/01/10

      @ Tim and Bill. Your assertion that I am dodging the issue does not stand up to scrutiny. It seems you may not be aware of what an independent panel of independent legal experts recently convened in London had to say. The report finds Japan’s current and proposed takings of humpback and sei whales as well as other whale species “are for primarily commercial purposes” and “plainly constitute international trade.” Japan has previously announced it intends to kill more than 1,400 whales this year including 100 sei whales and 50 humpback whales, a species protected from commercial hunting for more than 40 years.

      Ambassador Alberto Szekely, an international law professor who served as coordinator of the London Panel and related expert panels convened in Paris and Sydney last year said “Japan’s repeated assertion that its whaling activities are legal is incorrect and misleading. “Scientific whaling” as conducted by Japan violates international law and should not be allowed to continue.”

      BTW it is not just the IWC. Japan is also in violation of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). As a member of the UN, Japan will be bound by the findings of the International Court of Justice which is a body of the UN.

      Rather than pour scorn on the messengers maybe you should redirect it towards the PM who does not seem to possess leadership qualities.

    • Tim says:

      09:18am | 12/01/10

      Deliah,
      You continue to sprout your silly argument even after it has been proved false.
      To sum up why you are wrong:
      Taking Japan to court would be a fruitless excercise. Even if it was proved that Japan’s whaling was commercial, Japan can leave the IWC at any time, making their whaling completely legal.

      Minke whales are not a regulated species under the CITES convention so how can they be in breach of it for hunting them?
      You should do your own research Deliah and not rely on the Pauline Hanson argument of “I just don’t like it”.

    • Deliah says:

      01:47pm | 12/01/10

      @ Tim. Obviously it is you who has a problem with research, something I do for a living. The Sei and Humpback whales are endangered,  thus your argument cannot be sustained.

    • Grant says:

      02:22pm | 12/01/10

      @ wolf,

      Sorry matey, I could only get it from places where it is legal, Norway and Japan.

      We are little behind the times here in Australia in regards to tasty sea-steak.

    • Tim says:

      02:52pm | 12/01/10

      Sorry Deliah,
      i made a mistake in my last comment,
      The whales are included in the CITES convention.

      However regarding these species (from the CITES convention):

      2. The export of any specimen of a species included in Appendix I shall require the prior grant and presentation of an export permit. An export permit shall only be granted when the following conditions have been met:
      (a) a Scientific Authority of the State of export has advised that such export will not be detrimental to the survival of that species;
      (b) a Management Authority of the State of export is satisfied that the specimen was not obtained in contravention of the laws of that State for the protection of fauna and flora;
      (c) a Management Authority of the State of export is satisfied that any living specimen will be so prepared and shipped as to minimize the risk of injury, damage to health or cruel treatment; and
      (d) a Management Authority of the State of export is satisfied that an import permit has been granted for the specimen.

      The same applies for imports of any species regulated under the act.

      Therefore as long as a Japanese scientific body approves the import or export of these whales by declaring the import or export will not endanger the species and is not for entirely commercial reasons then it is entirely legal.
      Do you get what i’m saying:
      The Japanese get to decide if its legal or not.

      And once again if the Japanese don’t like any adverse findings against them in any court, they can withdraw from these conventions, thus making their activities completely legal.

      Deliah if you conduct research for a living, then you have been deliberately misleading during this entire thread. Either that or you are really bad at your job.

    • Maurice says:

      11:40pm | 12/01/10

      Our Australian group travelling in Norway were offered whale meat. All of us tried it and most liked it. None of us opposed sustainable harvesting of whales. Discussing this issue locally in Australia, general opinion was that the piratical and criminal actions of the fanatical extremists of the Sea Shepherd organisation should be stopped by the authorities before they occasion loss of human life. How does Ellen Whinnett arrive at her ridiculous claim that Paul Watson is winning the PR battle hands down?.
      Also I don’t understand why a stallholder in the Tokyo fish market would have chased her away unless she was being offensive. The displays were quite open when I was there.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter