Harry M Miller’s revelation that Prince Charles wondered why Australia remained a constitutional monarchy will come as no surprise to those of us who have been reporting on and watching the British royals for some time.

And in closing may I just say…Australia, what the hell were you thinking?

If there’s one thing that senior members of the royal family detest it’s the fawning and groveling of those they meet, and Australia heads the list of major offenders in that department.

As an example, some years ago the Queen decided that the last century habit of women dropping a curtsy was no longer necessary but the individuals could continue to bend the knee if it made them happy.

Those who continue this archaic nonsense of course misread the monarch’s message which was – please don’t bother.

And in recent years the so called “mystique” which once surrounded that elite, out of touch mob, has been stripped bare by the behavior of the family’s younger members who are no longer taken seriously, except of course by die-hard monarchists.

The have ceased to royal and have cloaked themselves in celebrity.

It’s a known fact that when the Duke of Edinburgh heard we rejected the opportunity to become a republic ten years ago he snapped: those Australians must be bloody mad!

Prince Charles might come across as being loopy – but he’s far from that. The bloke has of course lived a life of privilege, but somehow he’s crashed through all that and does great things for disadvantaged young people.

But so what?

As this country’s, God help us, next head of state, what he does for his own people – is of no concern in Australia. The monarchists would have us believe the British royal family is Australia’s royal family…funny that. not an Australian among them!

Harry M Miller’s revelation couldn’t have come at a better time. If the next King of Australia wonders why we don’t become a republic, why don’t we do something about it?

- Barry Everingham is a commentator on royalty

Most commented

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Liz says:

      06:56am | 17/11/09

      You bet, couldn’t agree more.We would ahve been 10 years ago if the questions hadn’t been cleverly put by the Howard Government.Bring it on!!

    • PG says:

      07:54am | 17/11/09

      I think the for or against now are about the same as last time.

      I personally don’t give a stuff whether Charlie wants to be king or not .To much hard work for him it sounds like. He would rather swan around his estates and not let any of the public cbother him—- well tough.

      —- The Monarchy rort is a good one. Our head of state lives 12,000 miles away—- in effect we don’t have a head of state and therefore don’t have to have another tier of government where we have to vote. for. Vote vote vote
      thats all we seem to do there are other things besides voting don’t you know

    • Graham S says:

      09:40am | 17/11/09

      Today’s Royal Family, nice people as they might be, are simply the last in the line of the original robber barons who gained the throne, wealth and power by virtue of having the strongest army and handing out largess to their supporters all those centuries ago. No different if the Castro’s, Kim il Jong’s or African despots decided to call themselves King, ceded power down the line to their family members, as they do with the support of their armies and create their own Royal Dynasties They would have their own fawning colonials bowing and scraping to them in the future, dispense their largess and create silly little titles and be recognised by future Governments as being “royal” just as the current English Royal family is treated today.

    • James says:

      10:22am | 17/11/09

      We should have our own royal family - isn’t there that bloke in WA who is related to the Queen. We could proclaim him King when the job comes up for grabs.

      In the meantime, why don’t we replace all the state governors with the GG. When you become GG you automatically become the governor for each state. We could save a fortune without much fuss. The role will be filled (no constitutional issue) and we dont have 6 extra “royal representatives” to fund.

    • Greg says:

      10:24am | 17/11/09

      The Republic is long overdue.

      I can still see the faces of those people who celebrated ten years ago when the referendum was defeated. Leave the royals for the Brits. Leave Australia as an independent proud, fair republic.

      When we eventually have another referendum—this time it should be a sensible yes or no vote—just wait and see the monarchist spread fear and claim every republican is a cafe late drinking greenie who wants to create a dictatorship to benefit only those on the so-called left - just as they do with anyone else who opposes their tired old revised view of a world that never really existed.

      Perhaps climate change deniers and monarchists are one and the same. Rip that union jack off our pretty little flag while we are at it.

    • Joel says:

      10:52am | 17/11/09

      The old “perhaps deniers are monarchists” line again!

      Honestly, talk about lumpen politics…

    • Joel B1 says:

      11:07am | 17/11/09

      And on more serious note:

      Think about it, would you like Rudd to be the first President of Australia? The guy’s got an ego the size of a small pacific island already!

      Give me inbreed Germanic-Brit-lout, Euro-trash Royalty any day

    • Garry says:

      11:07am | 17/11/09

      As English born I have to really laugh at Australian’s who like several here cry… ‘no different to blah blah and African despots’ or ‘they are 12,000 miles away and an Australian they are not’ I actually do not mind if Australia is a monarchy or a republic for that is up to the people and not a few. If majority say yes then we should become a republic.

      The Royal Family may be just a symbol of a long historical line of colonial power, who set forth to ‘conquer’ the world but then so did other nations at that time. As to the comment the Royal family are like robber barons, please, read history and tell me who was not doing that in our world history. Our world today was designed by invading armies and that is part of history – I would hope (perhaps pray) we should never repeat.

      I still see value, respect and delight at having a Royal Family but understand many will not but then that is something that makes us better than despot led don’t you think. We should be proud at the country we have become, proud of what we are and proud of being Australian. Or history, warts and all, is something we cannot change physically but can leave a better history by our attitudes and actions now.

      Australia needs to decide if we should or should not but before we do, I want Australia to decide on the format and the laws to ensure real despots do not get into power. Nations who have not had these checks and balances turn into countries like those some think we are no better than.

      Those who make silly arguments and through crass and insulting remarks on their fellow Australians, do the debate and ‘their side’ no justice.

    • Joel B1 says:

      11:38am | 17/11/09

      Wow! “When we eventually have another referendum—this time it should be a sensible yes or no vote—just wait and see the monarchist spread fear and claim every republican is a cafe late drinking greenie who wants to create a dictatorship to benefit only those on the so-called left - just as they do with anyone else who opposes their tired old revised view of a world that never really existed.”

      The Punch moderators: Is this stuff copyright? Does the original writer own it, or you? Or is it in the public domain?

      It’s just that I’ve got a blog that could use this stuff.

    • kym durance says:

      03:02pm | 17/11/09

      its only a matter of time -

    • BenZ says:

      03:09pm | 17/11/09

      James @ 11:22am. The bloke you are most probably referring to is Michael Abney-Hastings, also known as the Earl of Loudoun. He is the most senior direct descendant of the Plantagenet kings, and moved to Australia in the 60s. He currently lives in Jerilderie NSW, and is a shire councillor there. If we were to have our very own Australian royal family, that’s a good place to start!

      Just look him up on Wikipedia if you want to learn more….

    • acker says:

      03:47pm | 17/11/09

      @BenZ ....re the Earl of Loudoun

      zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Ditch Liz, Chas, Bill and the rest of the pompous nepotistic prats.

      The Monarchy connection has now become a big negative for Australia

    • Lyn P says:

      04:33pm | 17/11/09

      It is wonderful to see people engaging in debate about our form of democracy. The latest polling several weeks ago put the majority at 56% that want a republic. We should be decrying the monarchists who are trying the ‘99 tactics of fear mongering to try and stop the debate. “The Queen is our head of state/ she isn’t the GG is—- we are a Constitional Monarchy/ we are a crowned republic”. Their story changes everytime they start to lose the battle. For the record, the Queen is most definitely our Head of State and we are most definitely a Constitutional Monarchy - anything else is just spin.  It is time to start calling the monarchists out and lobbying your local MP. The ALP has the move to a republic as part of their policy platform, and has had for many years. Why won’t they start a national discussion about how this will come about? The Libs need to get on board before they are wedged out. The loudest voices in the Liberal Party are the same right wing MP’s who think that fire is a recent invention!!

    • TLC says:

      06:05pm | 17/11/09

      Long live the King and His mare Camila!

    • Old Bert says:

      06:11pm | 17/11/09

      Oh I don’t know, I think we should have Chas here as the GG,  bring whatshername too of course. What’s wrong with a bit of forelock tugging, a sweeping curtsy,  from the girls that is, on the other hand some chappies might feel miffed. And then there’s Maunday Thursday, when pensioners get pennies from the pouch, even get their feet washed, if whatshername would agree to this. And how about the yeomen of Canberra presenting a load of cabbages to Yarralumla, to ease the burden of the good folk in service downstairs, and likely a recognition of such sacrifice by HRH, perhaps a grant of freehold title instead of serfdom. There will be afternoon teas of course on the lawns, lots of gossip from the ladies and some speculation on marriage prospects for those bachelors of means with “connections”,  whose military duties have prevented them from rescuing the damsel whose secret desire is for her suitor.  . But wait, there’s more, scribes can report the going’s on in parchment pinned to notices on the common square. There’s a lot to be said about keeping the royals in the Australian purview, eh mate?

    • stephen says:

      09:49pm | 17/11/09

      Forget about it. Spend your money sending , say, 10 Trade Representatives to South America and South East Asia to encourage Corporations and business to establish at least a Bureau here, and hopefully a Head Office. (And inland too) There’s too much baloney in this country about status. And i maintain, the argument about a Republic is another example of this.

    • Bruce says:

      10:06pm | 17/11/09

      Of course we should be a republic. Until all the dinosaurs in the Labor and Liberal party have passed on, not much is going to happen. Both parties know its an election looser. However, Australia’s biggest problem is deciding on the format. I will NOT support a publically voted “El Presidente” along with a publically voted PM. Otherwise its status quo.

    • stephen says:

      12:32am | 18/11/09

      PS This is one of the problems of the Labour party, and indeed when Gough was PM : Labour tend to title and sub-title all action. Once, of course, it is recognized by the proletariat, then it really doesn’t have to work. We’re supposed to feel good. (A Republic won’t help families earning 38 grand a year.)

    • Barbara says:

      01:42am | 18/11/09

      Clever wording won the day for Howard and the Monarchists…...Cant wait for the next vote….bring it on

    • Emily says:

      08:29pm | 07/02/12

      You’re so right Peter. Their is a hcdraore of monarchists who will never change their views, irrespective of the facts. In fact I think they’re partially motivated by the illogic of the monarchy. There’s also a deep strain of anti-republicanism amongst the self-appointed supporters of the monarchy.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins It's interesting - I think sentimentalism was hugely powerful for both leadership & staff. Or management just afraid to change

Paul Colgan

Crane operator hits tree, knocks out power to a third of Vietnam http://t.co/MLOkcmb262

Paul Colgan

Memo to Ford: You need to make things people actually want to buy http://t.co/duaZQ0CHQY

Daniel Piotrowski

Umbrella's probably a LITTLE unnecessary http://t.co/agbtHSlpmt

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter