So what are we to make of 2011, a year in which one has hardly been able to catch one’s breath in between momentous events (and it’s only just September!). 

And then there's the NT News…

We have had major environmental disasters (the Queensland floods, the Christchurch earthquake, the Japan earthquake/tsunami), and the spectacular fall from grace of seemingly unassailable powerful men (such as Tunisia’s Zine el Abadine Ben Ali, Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, Libya’s Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, Osama Bin Laden, IMF Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn (even though rape charges were recently dropped), and Rupert Murdoch).

For the second time in a few years, the global economy teeters (including the first downgrade of the US’s sovereign debt status since 1917 and the very real possibility of the demise of the Eurozone). Anders Breivik wreaked havoc in a murderous rampage in Norway.  We also have a new state in the form of South Sudan. There have also been flashbacks to unfortunate episodes of the 1980s, with a major (and ongoing and unresolved) nuclear emergency in Japan’s Fukushima recalling the Chernobyl disaster, famine in East Africa, and England’s recent riots recalling unrest under Thatcher, oh ... and on a nicer note, a Royal Wedding.

Probably the signature characteristic of 2011 has been the extraordinary outbreak of protests, demonstrations, riots, and even overthrows of government. Most obviously, there has been the “Arab Spring”. Two long-standing dictators, Ben-Ali and Mubarak, were, remarkably, overthrown in a few weeks through the dogged perseverance of unarmed protesters. 

The contagion of Arab protest spread to Bahrain, Yemen and Libya, and in February it seemed inevitable that those regimes would topple, resembling another 1980s image, the fall of the Iron Curtain from 1989. 

While there was a pause in that domino effect, the Arab Spring may have picked up momentum again.  Libya, where the situation swiftly deteriorated into armed insurrection and then an international war involving NATO, has now reached an endgame, while the regime of President Saleh in Yemen (he’s still in Saudi Arabia receiving treatment after an assassination attempt) is decidedly unsteady.

Demonstrations, coupled with regular lethal responses from the government, have also gripped Syria, undoubtedly weakening and isolating the Assad regime. 

Alongside the Arab Spring there have been major protests and more serious conflagrations in many States across the world: lower key but still unprecedented protests in other Arab countries including Morocco, Algeria and Jordan; a civil war resulting in the overthrow of Laurent Gbagbo in Cote d’Ivoire; opposition protests in Uganda; massive protests over the cost of living in Israel; demonstrations by thousands in Mexico against the futility and bloodiness of the country’s war on drugs; pro-union demonstrations in Wisconsin; anti-corruption demonstrations in India; anti-austerity protests in Spain and Greece; and, as noted above, the riots in London and other English cities.  There have even been major protests, albeit with little global (or local) media coverage, in China.

So, to borrow a phrase from a prescient blog by the BBC’s Paul Mason from February, why is it kicking off everywhere?  The causes are undoubtedly complex, but the following are relevant considerations.

1. Economic downturns, including very high levels of youth unemployment (see, for example, this New York Times opinion by Roger Cohen and this Bloomberg piece) and escalating food prices (see also here), are driving mass dissatisfaction across the world. 

Victims include vast numbers of educated youth, who see dismal prospects for themselves, a phenomenon Mason has referred to as “the graduate with no future”.  These underemployed people are not happy, even outraged, and are very good at organising others to join in that outrage, especially through the use of social media (see point 5 below).

2. The consequences of economic globalisation, incorporating extreme inequalities resulting from neoliberal policies, which were seriously discredited by the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. Massive bailouts saved the banks then, but have now helped to generate unsustainable government debts in the Northern hemisphere.

And the solutions (across-the-board austerity measures) seem to uniformly target the poor and middle class, who had little to do with creating the mess, rather than the rich and powerful (again, see Roger Cohen).  Indeed, in light of the US’s refusal to raise taxes to address its spiralling debt, consider former World Bank Economist Joe Stiglitz’s essay on how the top 1 per cent in the US control 40 per cent of wealth and 25 per cent of income.

3. Uncertainty while we transition from a sustained phase of Western, particularly US, dominance to a phase where new powers, such as India, Brazil, and particularly China, have greater global influence (again, see Roger Cohen and also Australia’s Hugh White).

4. Global disillusionment with the political class, including:

(a)  weariness and even disgust over increasingly bitter political polarisation, most obviously exhibited in the unedifying fiasco over raising the US debt ceiling, and the blame game over the causes of the London riots. The relentless scoring of points off political opponents is likely distracting many governments from governing and oppositions from acting in the national interest.

(b) corrupt or incompetent behaviour: witness Japan’s clumsy response to Fukushima and the embarrassing revelations of British police and government toadying to Rupert Murdoch, a man since humbled by revelations of appalling criminal activity within his British media empire (see also last Monday’s 4 Corners report on that matter).

(c) limited political choices. While economic concerns were the main driver behind Spanish protests, one aspect was general disdain for its political system. In Australia too we are presented with the uninspiring duo of Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott, who are competing for the least disapproval from the public.  Certain issues are currently off the political table, despite majority support for reform or at least meaningful debate, as on the issues of continued Australian participation in the Afghan war and same sex marriage.  Though I’m not opposed to it, I must concede public anger over the proposed introduction of a carbon tax from 2012 without an electoral mandate.

This criticism in (c) may not be fair. Many leaders seem to take on a glow after they’ve left power, causing us to forget how hopeless we thought they were when in power. In the US, Ronald Reagan is viewed so benevolently that there is talk of his Memorial being erected in Washington DC, an honour reserved only for the “greatest” of US Presidents.

Bill Clinton’s reputation as President is also enjoying a renaissance. Furthermore, perhaps Lindsay Tanner is right to blame the relentless 24/7 media cycle for the trivialisation of politics into soundbites. Certainly, the misleading and biased commentaries of people like Alan Jones or, in the US, the Fox News Channel, add little to a healthy political culture.

However, the Australian people are far smarter than our leaders give us credit for.  As scathingly (and correctly) noted by George Megalogenis, “Gillard and Abbott don’t do nuance. Their hollowed-out public language presupposes that voters can think only in slogan”.  The Australian public deserve better politicians, as do many across the world.

(d) the cynicism of international politics as usual, namely Realpolitik, has been exposed by Wikileaks and the unexpected peoples’ insurrections. For example, the US was strongly aligned with Mubarak’s venal and brutal regime.  He was perceived as a stable and reliable safeguard for US interests, so who cared about his impact on the interests of ordinary Egyptians?

Consequently, the US was a deer in the headlights of the Arab Spring protests, with President Obama only belatedly and reluctantly opting for the side of history and abandoning his ally Mubarak.  Realpolitik does not take into account the possibility that the people might pop up to fight for their own interests in disregard of the strategic interests of foreign governments.

5. Social media and the Internet have not caused the uprisings but have been crucial in facilitating widespread political conversation, the organisation of protests and the galvanisation of protesters, as I’ve discussed elsewhere. Furthermore, the Internet enables the masses (including the increasing numbers of connected people of the developing world) to interact without traditional intermediaries, spreading news, ideas, and information (and, indeed, misinformation).

It provides a global public space with the potential to act as a people’s counterweight to the elite, remote and often unaccountable power of global titans such as superpowers, multinational corporations and international financial institutions (on this point, see this Atlantic article by Zeynep Tufekci). For example, the Internet has provided the means for a key insurgent force, Wikileaks, to threaten the control traditionally exercised by government and corporate elites over information.

2011 has been a watershed year.  For whatever reason, thousands and thousands have felt compelled to, in the words of the great Peter Finch from 1976’s Network, stick their necks out and make it clear that they’re as mad as hell and they aren’t gonna take it anymore.  And, it has truly been a year in which there has simply been ... too much news.

Sarah Joseph will be speaking at the 2011 Adelaide Festival of Ideas (7-9 October). For more information go to www.adelaidefestivalofideas.com.au

Most commented

37 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • TChong says:

      06:02am | 03/09/11

      News ?
      How about “The Mighty Magpies do the Colly Wobbles” right at the wrong end of the season .
      Maybe they are just trying to build up the suspense leading to their Grand Final defence.

    • Aitch B says:

      11:01am | 03/09/11

      Build up the suspense, Chongy???

      Absolute cobblers, mate…. they were hammered by a far better outfit on the night. The Pies really did look quite pathetic.

      More than half the supporters disappeared at 3/4 time. “Side by side we stick together”..... yeah, right!!

      Eddie’s and that loser Joffa’s face said it all…......

    • Nikki Heat says:

      11:52am | 03/09/11

      Melbourne Footy Grand Final 2011 AFL
      Sydney Swans Versus West Coast
      Sydney Footy Grand Final 2011 NRL
      St George Illawarra Versus Wests Tigers
      2011 World Cup Rugby Union Final
      Australia versus New Zealand

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:25am | 04/09/11

      A wave of sick leave is expected on the morrow as 80,000 magpie fans complain of a tickle in the back of the throat..

    • Anubis says:

      11:58am | 04/09/11

      If it were any team other than Collingwood that went into the final round intending it to be a practice game then the AFL would be investigating them match fixing. Collingwood representatives stated last week that they were going to treat it as a practice match and expected Geelong to do the same. Didn’t happen. Geelong went in to play serious football and, as a result, Collingwood came undone. The lack of concern was clearly indicated by the “who cares” attitude displayed when Malthouse went on to the ground at the end of the third quarter and pretty much just wandered around smiling and joking rather than addressing the players and trying to rev them in to playing match footy rather than practice footy.

      Collingwood should be investigated and penalised and should also be required to play the same number of interstate games next year as all other teams. It is time the AFL stopped the Collymoddling and treated the same as all other teams.

    • acotrel says:

      06:13am | 03/09/11

      Regardless of all the bad things that happened, 2011 has been the most promising year I’ve ever experienced.  It even looks like our parliament might be forced to deal fairly with the wretched asylum seekers, and find a constructive way of helping them in their plight.  And Tony Abbott still hasn’t crept into power !

    • Chris_D says:

      08:50am | 03/09/11

      @acotrel, I’m thinking you are in your 60/70’s, and 2011 is “the most promising year I’ve ever experienced”?

      No wonder you are so bitter.

    • acotrel says:

      10:30am | 03/09/11

      @ChrisD
      Look at the good side of 2011.  We have promise resolution of the dictatorships in the middle east.  We have promise resolution of an untenable global financial situation which was promoted by years of mismanagement.  We have a strong likelihood that we’ll find a solution to the misery of the few thousand displaced persons coming to our country.  We have a level of public debate over the web which makes us much more likely to find creative answers to problems.  I’m 69, and I’ve never been more optimistic.  I remember when all public debate was stifled by the likelihood of the slur of calling people communists !

    • Chris_D says:

      11:26am | 03/09/11

      @acotrel, I don’t know what happy pills you are on today, but I don’t think most people would share your enthusiasm.

      I would suggest most Aussies are more worried about the dictatorship in the middle of Canberra than the middle east, and most people have been negatively affected by the GFC.  When they look at their Super figures, I doubt they would see the sunshine.

      And the web has been around for a while now.  Maybe it’s given you a new outlet to vent, but again i don’t necessarily see that as sunshine either.  wink

    • acotrel says:

      02:24pm | 03/09/11

      @ChrisD
      Is the glass half full, or is it half empty?  If you listened to Abbott you’d slash your wrists ! It’s quite simple, all you do is look where you want to go, analyse the risks, and work your way towards it.  Australia can be what it wants to be.  Being negative is destructive. It’s all about maintaining confidence.  Can you explain why the Australian economy is exemplary during the GFC if the goverment is so bad ?

    • TimB says:

      06:19pm | 03/09/11

      “Can you explain why the Australian economy is exemplary during the GFC if the goverment is so bad ? “

      Because the previous government left the country in great shape.

      Credit where credit is due please Acotrel.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      11:23pm | 04/09/11

      The BEST thing to happen this year is that Julia looks like she’ll be gone by the end of the month & Tony Abbott will be a shoo in

    • Erick says:

      06:31am | 03/09/11

      Some good points in this article, though tainted by far-left bias.

      It should be noted that the “Arab Spring” may yet turn out to be an autumn, with many of the revolutions seeming set to put hard-line Islamic fundamentalists in power. The consequences are yet to be seen.

      The analysis of the global financial crisis here is very one-sided, with the author blaming it all on rich and greedy corporations and failing to note the role of unsustainable debt-financed welfare states.

      Likewise, the emphasis on right-leaning media such as Alan Jones and Fox News ignores the influence of the equally biased left-leaning media such as the ABC and the New York Times.

      This article has some good analysis of the global crisis, but also inadvertently reveals the crisis in academia - a narrow left-wing ideology that permeates the academy and blinds it to half the world.

    • Jotun says:

      08:50am | 03/09/11

      I agree on the balance issue Erick, but do have a look at one particular country that is being crippled by debt - how much did those rich, greedy banks, manufacturers and financial institutions that have been unfairly targeted get from the US Congress again?

    • acotrel says:

      09:47am | 03/09/11

      @Erick
      ‘The analysis of the global financial crisis here is very one-sided, with the author blaming it all on rich and greedy corporations and failing to note the role of unsustainable debt-financed welfare states.’

      While we’re playing the blame game, perhaps we should recognise that human weakness was a factor in the GFC, and this was exacerbated by the lack of balanced regulation ?  Who do you believe should take responsibility for that ? Who was the President of the US when the GFC happened ?

    • John says:

      10:28am | 03/09/11

      Erick is right the establishment might have all the wealth, control the western news media networks, the politicians, but they also have a red international socialist agenda. Just look Europe every political leader and party are basically socialists. Multiculturalism is everywhere where the socialist establishment rules. Another thing to point out is the phoney fake left and right political para-dim. Lets look at this way if the right are the warmonger’s and the left the non-war mongers? Then why is that every mainstream media outlets carries war propaganda? and also leftist human rights propaganda against the enemy’s of the so called right? It seems clear to me there is only one political forces that rules the west, and this political force is creating the illusion of democracy. They basically push establishment agenda. Just think of the coordination required to bomb Libya! Three country’s and the entire western media behind it?, socialist human rights courts, UN There is no chance this is by chance, this is structured control. Where is the opposition to the Libyan war in the west???  You would think after 2 disasters there would be one!!  Face it people, you are sheep being manipulated to support and follow the establishment agenda.  There is no democracy. alan Jones, glen beck, and the so called right leaning personality’s, are nothing but controlled opposition by the establishment.

    • Erick says:

      10:36am | 03/09/11

      @Jotun & Acotrel - I am not letting the big greedy financial institutions off the hook. They have their share of the blame.

      I’m just pointing out that it isn’t the whole picture. Massive growth in government spending, based on borrowed money, is also a huge contributor to the problem. Much of that spending goes toward bribing specific groups of voters.

      It’s a huge problem that’s been exacerbated by both sides of the political coin - Right and Left. Solving it just might require us to drop some of our partisanship.

    • Condor says:

      01:13pm | 03/09/11

      Jotun
      The bailout packages given to the banks were paid back very quickly. Other stimulus packages are designed to inflate the economy according to normal Keynesian fiscal policy and are more designed at keeping employment and consumer spending going.

      Ultimately, it’s about keeping voters happy.

      Acotrel
      Yes, a lack of regulation was part of the problem. It started back in the 70s and was an escalating problem since then The govt deregulated business and then overinflated it by stiumulating certain areas: namely the property market through encouraging loans to poor people.

      The GFC is a welfare-state crisis. Not a Financial one.

    • acotrel says:

      02:32pm | 03/09/11

      @Condor blaming loans to poor people to buy houses, as a cause of the GFC ignores a difference between US legislation, and ours.  In Australia the banks can pursue you to the grave if you default on your mortgage.  The moratorium on loans was removed while Jack Lang was alive, and he declared that if it wasn’t important, why remove it ! The moratorium has probably saved us by maintaining a sense of reality.

    • acotrel says:

      02:41pm | 03/09/11

      @Erick
      ‘the “Arab Spring” may yet turn out to be an autumn, with many of the revolutions seeming set to put hard-line Islamic fundamentalists in power.’

      Your phobia about islamic fundamentalists is pointless. Nothing changes due to revolutuions in the middle east.  All that happens is the guys near the top simply shift allegiance to the new leader, and the whole system remains controlled by religion.  The system in most of those countries is corrupt from top to bottom, and a change to democracy won’t change that.  The mullahs still rule, and always will. The Libyans might benefit by a fairer distribution of petrodollars, but the exploiters will still be there, relying on the power of the mullahs.

    • Condor says:

      01:38pm | 04/09/11

      acotrel
      The GFC originated in America as a result of an overinflated property sector (welfare state). When America sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold. You’re right that in Australia we don’t have non-recourse loans, however, whoever allowed loans to be higher than 80% also made a bad decision. Not as bad, but bad nonetheless.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      11:25pm | 04/09/11

      Jotun, the sub-prime was a leftard idea from Clinton, that is what caused the problem

    • Chris_D says:

      06:40am | 03/09/11

      Maybe the media should just report actual newsworthy events and leave all the BS/social/trivial stuff in the street where it belongs, or at the very least in the trashy tabloids instead of on the front page.

    • John says:

      10:34am | 03/09/11

      They need to dumb society, so that their masters can remain in power. Can you imagine an informed public? The entire western banking, political and media establishment would be toppled with in days.
      The media is really no here for making money on advertising! It’s there to shape, manipulate public opinion so that the elite can have their wars, their oil, their wealth and their global agenda. The media creates a distorted reality, a fantasy reality! It’s nothing but an expression of lies, delusions and illusions.

    • acotrel says:

      08:08am | 03/09/11

      I wonder if the changing global situation since Howard was in power,  has increased the ‘push factor’ , and it wasn’t really his poor treatment of asylum seekers which ‘stopped the boats’ ?

    • Max, of Rocky says:

      10:03am | 03/09/11

      You can’t have it both ways, when Howard was in government the Afghan and Iraq wars were at full tilt.

      Even by your standards the wars are winding down considerably.

      These asylum seekers can afford 5-10 years basic wages in their country to pay boat smugglers to come here. That is after their trip by whatever means to Indonesia and living there for an indeterminate period.

      My deduction is that most are economic asylum seekers looking to a better life through our prosperity.  Notice their clothes when you see them on TV, they’re not in rags but well dressed.

      You think Howard treated them badly, Gillard was throwing them to the wolves in Malaysia with no real guarantee of anything other than misery .

      Howard fed them, schooled them, gave medical assistance and did the checks for asylum. 

      Ms Gillard and herr Bowen were a sickening pair of opportunist political minnows attempting to save their hides by being so ultrasmart they were made to look positively foolish and inept.  They both have no credibility left.  (much like yours for dredging up the past hoping to find an out and the ensuing rants)

    • The Badger says:

      11:18am | 03/09/11

      And here we have Max telling us how compassionate and caring the conservatives are. The conservatives stir up war and the Australian branch of the conservative party do the bidding of their foreign masters and in return they get a pat on the back and an attaboy.
      Meanwhile, the hornets nest the conservatives have stirred up forces decent people to flee their homeland to save their lives. What a one eyed donkey there is in rocky and his name is max.

    • fml says:

      10:37am | 05/09/11

      Max,

      “These asylum seekers can afford 5-10 years basic wages in their country to pay boat smugglers to come here”, Are you serious? Why isnt it possible for them to sell their house. Also, how much is a house worth to you if you are in the middle of a war, or being persecuted ???

      Persecution does not care if you own a house or not.

    • John says:

      11:26am | 03/09/11

      The west is utter mess is because the it’s lead by international socialists, who dictate foreign and internal policy’s for the western nations they occupy. When you have a leadership that is thinking about their international interests, you can clearly see why the US ends with 17 trillions dollar of debt, London, Paris burns because of socialist multiculturalism, huge debts and social tensions caused by Internationalists, millions of jobs lost to china because of Internationalist free market model(everything made in china) and borrowing money from international bankers is sending nations into huge debt. The Nations are getting weaker and weaker and poorer because they no long produce any goods and services. The only way to resolve this entire issue is Nationalism. if Internationalism keeps on going it will drag nations to the abyss. The International Socialist New World Order is about to collapse. The West is like on drip feed now! Years and Years running a international socialist model that was looting their nations and weakening them as society will come to roast, as the west will go into cardiac arrest.

    • Nikki Heat says:

      11:48am | 03/09/11

      2011 was 2011.It is an “annus horribilis” QE2

    • Sheeple says:

      01:18pm | 03/09/11

      How did the twin towers collapse so perfectly and why was WTC7 blown up? What was the deal with Odigo and the celebratory ‘students’ on the rooftop?

    • Lloyd says:

      10:53pm | 03/09/11

      2011 is not over yet. I think wrap ups should be done at the end of the year. Not that anything of major importance has ever happened after the 3RD of September before…

    • Sarah says:

      07:33am | 04/09/11

      Indeed that makes sense. This blog is part of a series by speakers in the Adelaide Festival of Ideas where my topic will be Human Rights and the Media. And, for better or worse, this is what I came up with. I’m going to publish one at the end of the year too, if not here then probably at castancentre.wordpress.com

    • stephen says:

      11:01pm | 03/09/11

      Why aren’t you writing a piece about the boats and their people ?
      I challenge you.

    • Sarah says:

      07:28am | 04/09/11

      This blog was written a little while ago (pre HC decision) as part of the series of blogs by presenters at the Adelaide Festival of Ideas (with small update on Thursday). I don’t think that the Adelaide Festival was mentioned when this was posted. Please visit castancentre.wordpress.com for more human rightsy blogs, including recent ones by my colleague Adam Fletcher on the Malaysia decision.

    • Wag the Dod says:

      11:31am | 04/09/11

      Rupert Murdoch in the same rejects bin as Osama bin Laden and Gadaffi? Because of the actions of a few employees? Hmmm.

    • Charles says:

      11:37am | 05/09/11

      2011 has highlighted what a vunerable world we have become. We are now a world economy, driven by sheer speculation, on the stock market. We are subjected to climate change more that ever, such as floods and earthquakes, which can reduce all of us down to nothing so quckily.  Governments throughout the world seem helpless to tackle problems as they occur, with no plans for the future. Politics are driven and decided by politics. The most crucial problem for all of us and my biggest beef is that there is very little in place for those who fall down. Governments must find a way of ensuring that those who want to work, can do so at any time of their life, without long delays of unemployment.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter