On the current, sickening trends, the number of Mexicans killed in the drug-related bloodshed which has paralysed the country since January 2007 will hit 10,000 within the next few weeks, or possibly even days.

Days of the dead: as of 22/8/09, the toll stands at 9903.

To put that in perspective, an estimated 3500 people died in the 30-year period of The Troubles in Northern Ireland. It also eclipses the number of American troops killed in the War in Iraq, which at the latest count stands at 4333.

Australia’s sizeable cokehead community - even the casual users who had a discreet line in the loo last night at some groovy Sydney wine bar - should give themselves a quiet pat on the back for the role they’ve played in the deaths of these people.

And every celebrity who revels in the attention of their own pathetic battle with substance abuse, and uses their “brave” decision to go into detox as some kind of fashion statement, should also take some of the credit too.

What’s happening in Mexico is a simple case study in supply and demand.

A dignified and sophisticated country has gone totally off the rails because its political class, its police force, and sections of its judiciary have either through greed or unimaginable fear become the vassals of the most despicable criminal gangs on the face of the earth.

The country’s most recent descent into lawlessness has been made possible primarily by political corruption, and the (literally) mind-blowing violence which is directed towards those who stand up to corruption. Men like the heroic 1994 presidential candidate and anti-cartel crusader Luis Donaldo Colosio, who ended up with a bullet in his skull while campaigning in a town square in Tijuana.

The word “brazen” does not even go close to capturing the conduct of the drug cartels in the elimination of any opposition, be it from rival drug gangs, or from politicians or the police.

To this end it is easy to see why so many good people in Mexico either ignore what is going on around them, or become involved in it out of fear for their safety.

So many of the people who have been killed have been impoverished street-level people who were heavied into low-level involvement with the warring cartels. A staggering number of the dead have been civilians who have been caught up in shootouts in restaurants, stores, public parks.

A few weeks ago 16 people were shot dead during a three-hour-long street fight in Acapulco, the jasmine-scented beach resort where middle-aged American folks arrive on cruise ships to drink cocktails out of coconuts.

It has also become common for warring cartels to execute not just their opponents but the wives, parents and children of their opponents.

In this freest of free markets, driven largely by the west’s insatiable appetite for drugs and its moral ambivalence of their use, the cartels have also acted like any other strategically-minded business by diversifying.

At the international level this has involved challenging long-standing drug distribution monopolies in Colombia and Asia. At the domestic level it’s involved exploiting and terrorising the Mexican population. 

It’s estimated that the drug cartels actually make more money from people smuggling than they do from the production and distribution of coke, because people are prepared to pay so much money to have a shot at a new life in the United States.

The heart-breaking character of Mexican people smuggling is that, again, it so often involves the parents of babies and toddlers who have gone to life-ending lengths to extract their children from the poverty they’ve been born into.

One of the most moving speeches I have ever heard was by Arizona Governor John McCain at a News Corporation conference in California, where he expounded on why he was one of the few Republicans who was championing a green card moratorium to let every “illegal” remain in the States. He told how he had personally witnessed crime scenes in the middle of the Arizona desert where entire families were found baked alive in the back of broken-down vans, huddled together and clutching their rosary beads.

The other rapidly-growing arm of these businesses is kidnapping and extortion, where innocent middle-class people who have no involvement whatsoever with the drug trade are picked up at random on the streets and held and usually beaten until they receive a ransom. Often when the ransom is paid they are still killed anyway as the cartels are determined to frame their reputation around notoriety.

In one recent case in Tijuana three kidnapped civilians were burned to death and their bodies were chained to the front of a popular pizza bar.

As someone who has lived in Mexico it pains and puzzles me that the extent of this brutality is largely ignored. The Mexicans are right in thinking that they are regarded by outsiders as a vaguely comical lot, generally seen in caricature.

The few stories from the Mexican drug war that have received attention by our media have been of the Quentin Tarantino meets Gabriel Garcia Marquez variety, such as the raid on a drug house which found a purpose-built pornographic movie studio and a private zoo with an albino lion, or the bust in the country’s north-east where, along with some 20 hit-men, dealers and extortionists, police also found the Mexican beauty queen Laura Zuniga, Miss Sinaloa 2008, who had become a gangster’s moll and was found hiding in a truck filled with AK-47s.

But these stories provide little context to what is really going on, where every day two or three people, on a bad day a dozen, get knocked off in the battle for market share, or the pursuit of profits unrelated to drugs.

One of the few media organisations that has devoted thought and energy to covering this war is the Los Angeles Times. Its website has a section called Mexico Under Siege and I urge anyone who is interested in what is really going on to read it.

The reality is that Mexico is now being subjected to a kind of moral and civil breakdown which isn’t a world away from what a mob like the Taliban has inflicted on Afghanistan, albeit for obviously different reasons.

But despite Obama’s visit to Mexico City and the rhetoric from Hillary Clinton about helping Mexico with law enforcement, the Mexicans are largely fending for themselves in this one-sided battle.

The origins of which can be traced back to our trendier bars and nightclubs where, unlike on the streets of Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez and Nogales, people are having the time of their lives.

Most commented

29 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      07:58am | 22/08/09

      You are blaming the wrong scapegoat. The problem is caused by drug prohibition, which creates a profit motive for crime.

      Of course, encouraging illegal immigration from Mexico will only bring the crime gangs into the US. What could possibly go wrong?

      P.S. The LA Times is the last place to go for accurate information about *anything*. http://patterico.com/category/dog-trainer/

    • SHG says:

      09:51am | 22/08/09

      Australia’s sizeable cokehead community ... should give themselves a quiet pat on the back for the role they’ve played in the deaths of these people.

      That’s like saying that every person who had a surreptitious beer during Prohibition is directly responsible for every act committed by the Mafia.

      How’s this for a different line of reasoning:

      These people are dying because of intense competition among drug cartels. Why is competition so intense? Because of the huge profits to be made. Why are there huge profits to be made? Because people around the world want cocaine, yet supplies are limited. Why are supplies limited? Because various governments have passed laws making production illegal.

      There’s (A) demand (see “groovy Sydney wine bars”) and (B) government-imposed limit on supply, thus (C) an opportunity for astronomical profits.  If you want to change (C), try changing (A) or (B). And you can’t change (A).

    • davewilson says:

      09:52am | 22/08/09

      100,000 Iraqis also died for our oil addiction. 5,000 Aussies die a year because Labor/Liberal were/are addicted to money from the Tobacco industry. The Afgan economy is built on a similar Mexican drug model of brutality and funding violence ,including the Taliban. The war on drugs was just a PR campaign to convince the religious right and other ignorants that this gi-normous global trade could be tamed or controlled. You just haven’t accepted the narcissistic, bloody, grinding machine of capitalism and global trade yet Penbo. Something all great empires are built on.

    • Terry Wright says:

      10:04am | 22/08/09

      What a load of crap. Do you feel guilty buying clothes made in overseas sweatshops? What about products made by political prisoners under brutal regimes? How about drinking booze made by companies that know it will kill 1000s of their customers? David, how about you pat yourself on the back for your contribution to the world’s alcohol cartels who kill more than the total death toll of the Mexican drug war every week?

      Illicit drugs are not regulated and have no controls so there is no real way to know their origin ... or anything about them really. Isn’t this the actual problem? Because of drug prohibition, it’s organised crime and criminals that manage the drug trade where there are no age restrictions, quality control or health guidelines? They can sell at schools, add any dangerous ingredients they choose and disputes are not settled in court but on the streets with guns and violence. And what about the marketing plans that includes terrorising the local police and public by mass executions and extreme violence.

      Don’t blame drug users for the sins of their suppliers. Blame the lying, self righteous, myopic politicians who continue to ignore expert advice and pursue a visceral “Tough on Drugs” policy that only fuels the carnage. Most of this violence could end now if drugs were regulated and sold via government authorities but instead the same old tired strategies are rolled out time and time again. And like clockwork, someone pulls out the old “blame the users” argument as the failure of the “War on Drugs”  hit the media headlines once more.

    • davido says:

      11:59am | 22/08/09

      Great article

    • Paul Scott says:

      01:50pm | 22/08/09

      Instead of continuing to manufacture predictable outrage about users that has permeated heritage media for the past 40 years, how about you point the finger at laws whose basis remain tied up in an outdated morality.

      Go check out what some of the USA’s top former law enforcement officers have to say about the crime, waste of resources and time and effort in prohibition of stimulants and opioids used recreationally by millions of people around the planet.

      http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php

      And watch The Wire which starts on ABC2 in September. Rarely has a case for the the lifting of prohibition on drugs been better framed than what David Simons has created in this gripping series set in Baltimore.

      It’s time to drop the moral outrage over users and suppliers and the drugs themselves. People are going to use drugs regardless of consequences - let’s focus on the associated health issues rather the circular and unwinnable war on drugs.

      Getting criminals out of dealing drugs, users out of prisons, drugs out of legislation books and misplaced outrage out of the heads of opinion columnists - even if we try it for limited time and it is a failure -  is surely worth a try because the deaths, increasing jail populations and waste of resources show that law is not interfering with demand.

      And where there is demand . . . there is an outraged opinion columnist sprouting same ol’ same ol’.

    • harry the hobo says:

      03:12pm | 22/08/09

      lol. Got to love the pro drug mob. Since beginning work in the health industry, it amazes me that people want to legalize drugs with the already astronomical amount of people coming in with costly mental defects from years of usage or those coming in that have overdosed. But I guess they don’t get to meet the families of those affected.

    • Martin says:

      10:18pm | 22/08/09

      David, this article is blatantly dishonest. Though, it will look great when you try for a job with ACA.

    • Dan says:

      03:52am | 23/08/09

      This article is ridiculous. So, if someone in Melbourne sniffs Coke, they are responsible for the deaths in Mexico? That’s absurd. As has been pointed above, the real reason why there are so many deaths is that drugs is still illegal. If the government legalises drugs, they can regulate it both in terms of safety and price, which would negatively affect illegal drug lords, and people can be treated rather than be punished. Additionally I think it is outrageous anyway that drugs are illegal as essentially they are illegal for moral reasons, and I don’t like the idea of morality guiding the law.

    • John says:

      12:07pm | 23/08/09

      @ Terry Wright

      “What a load of crap. Do you feel guilty buying clothes made in overseas sweatshops?”

      Yeah I do actually. You don’t?

    • Terry Wright says:

      01:07pm | 23/08/09

      Well said Harry the Hobo. A massive 0.4% of Australian drugs users have mental disorders from cannabis use and a whooping 0.0125% of UK drug users have cannabis induced schizophrenia. Definitely “astronomical” figures.

      Less than a month ago, Keele university in the UK released the findings on their research into the rising use of cannabis and mental health admissions. They pointed out that although cannabis use had increased dramatically since the 1980s, cases of mental health disorders had dropped slightly. They concluded that cannabis use had not made any recognisable impact on mental health problems over the last 3-4 decades. In other words, if cannabis was as dangerous to mental health as suggested by you Harry, the MSM, the government, NCPIC etc. there would be a major epidemic on out hands and we would need hundreds of new hospitals just to deal with them.

    • miles says:

      03:51pm | 23/08/09

      well, from the comments here, if you want to assuage your guilt over your complicity with the violence and bloodshed which the drug trade deals, the only thing to do is to increase supply
      you are a fairly large portion of the population, either stop being ashamed of your habits and demand a safe, legal, controlled supply or else stop using

    • Geoff Cass says:

      04:26pm | 23/08/09

      Your comment:  For so l,ong as we are prepared to put up with drug dealers, we will have these problems.  To my mind there is only the one way to deal with them -  every time one is caught with drugs on him/her. make them take in all the drugs they have on them via their mouths.
      If it doesnlt acjieve anything else, it will rid us of those who are caught, and will get the message through to the others that the penalty for drug-dealing is not nice.

    • davido says:

      05:22pm | 23/08/09

      I thought this article was about the damage the drug industry has done to Mexico.

      Most of these comments sound like people protesting too much.

      You should know that the federal police track sites like this. Youre MAC has been logged so watch out.

    • Steve Robinson says:

      01:39am | 24/08/09

      Terry is spot on - it’s prohibition that causes the problem the we see in Mexico. Sensibly the Mexican Government has just announced legislative changes to decriminalise personal use of all illicit dugs - citing amongst other reasons: the need to limit the corruption of law enforcement that flows from the enforcement of impractical laws.

      On a slightly different tangent - David’s central premise: that Australian cocaine users are inflicting mayhem on the citizens of Mexico is actually pretty ludicrous. Whilst certainly the cocaine used in Australia is hardly produced ethically by people concerned with the welfare of their employees or the environment or any number of other things - virtually none of it comes to us via Mexico. Information on drug supply routes is readily available to anyone who takes the time to research it - however it does of course get in the way of hyperbole and self-important and inflated rhetoric. Do we really need to hear one more time that you lived in Mexico for a time David? We get it… you lived there… I spent 9 months in a womb - that doesn’t mean I pretend to understand what it means to live in an aquatic environment!

      Australia’s cocaine supply comes either directly from the source to our shores - or increasingly through certain African nations where South American crime syndicates have gained a foothold and are able to exert considerable pressure on impoverished governments.

      The Mexican drug cartels operate to supply, primarily, the North American drug market - the US being clearly the biggest customer. Given that the US invented the “war on drugs” - one of Nixon’s invaluable contributions to world stupidity - it is a tragic and bitter irony that the US demand for illicit drugs, per capita, is one of the highest (no pun intended) in the world.

      Again - as others have said - prohibition is the problem and if we were only to either legalise and regulate supply of currently illicit drugs - or else, for those who find this idea anathema - instead license and register individuals who would then be able to purchase, for private consumption, any drug they like - we could pull the rug from under these criminal gangs. Just like the Chicago mob in the roaring 20s - where there is demand someone will find a way to supply that demand. Moreover the desire to alter, expand and in some cases obliterate our consciousness is a desire as old as human kind - we can not legislate away human nature.

      The war on drugs is a failure and it’s time to stop confusing the damage done by prohibition which is immense with the actual damage caused by illicit drugs which is certainly real - however it affects primarily the individual using the drug and does not threaten the security of entire communities and the viability of states.

    • Ali says:

      10:23am | 24/08/09

      Why just Mexico? Why not really grasp the nettle and go for the big boys? In other parts of the world Governments support,condone and do not stop drug growing and exporting.Where do drug profits go? grasp that one and we’ll get somewhere.

    • stephen says:

      11:49am | 24/08/09

      People take drugs because they’re not poets, not because they are, and this notion that regular drug users are misunderstood, highly articulate will-o-the-wisp adventurers ignores this fact ; most heavy drug use involves crime, and even light use has major health risks.
      Drugs should never be legalized (never, ever) and its use is a form of cowardice : if you don’t want reality, if common life is just too much to bear, then buy a comic book. (Mexico’s in strife because us ‘sophisticates’ in the West equate drug taking with risk taking.)e.g. ‘must the the only way the middle class can prove they’re a man.

    • Jake Zanoni says:

      12:03pm | 24/08/09

      Harry the Hobo:  I’m so passionate about ending the war on drugs not only because I’m a libertarian that believes in the fundamental individual freedom of all human beings.

      I am so passionate because I AM that family member that you speak of, and I saw first hand how the war on drugs and prohibition made things so very very worse for my loved one.

      Nobody here is arguing that drugs can’t do terrible things to people, but prohibition only hurts people across the board.

      See my blog posts on the drug war http://www.pimpinforfreedom.wordpress.com

    • Dan says:

      01:56pm | 24/08/09

      Stephen, it doesn’t matter what you think about people who take drugs; if someone wants to take drugs, that should be their right. Who are you to tell people that they shouldn’t take drugs? You may think it’s cowardice, or whatever, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be legalised.

    • stephen says:

      02:51pm | 24/08/09

      @ Dan. Mexico ?

    • SHG says:

      04:23pm | 24/08/09

      I was having my morning coffee—man, I just can’t get started without that macchiato—and thought to myself “stephen’s right! Drugs should never be legalized, never ever!”

      Boy I could use a beer right now, this campaigning against legal drugs is hard work.

    • Dan says:

      10:33pm | 24/08/09

      Yes, Stephen. Mexico, which has nothing to do with drug users. You do realise that if drugs were legalised, there wouldn’t be the violence in Mexico.

    • Fi says:

      11:35pm | 24/08/09

      So David, how about directing the same rhetoric and vitriol towards the consumers of Mattel products, namely little girls (and their parents), who consume Barbie dolls at the expense of the hundreds of Mexican women who die each year on the outskirts of of Cuidad Juarez on their way home from the maquiladoras of Mattel and like companies?

      Blame the Mexican gangs and entrenched corruption by all means, but do not confuse supply and demand with unfettered greed that gains critical mass. Fear is a motivating force yet history has shown us countless examples of humans overcoming that base emotion.  The good people of Mexico need support (from the US and their allies, read: Australia) and they need to step up their efforts to fight crime and injustice on their own turf.

    • Jeremy C Browne says:

      08:43am | 25/08/09

      Fantastic article David.  The argument from the ‘harm minimization’ lobby as above is simply ridiculous.  They must be getting pretty desperate if all they can argue is that it’s prohibition that’s causing so much misery in Mexico and not the demand in the west.  Their idea that everyone has the right to take illegal drugs and feel no social responsibility to those poor people tortured, killed and cowered is pathetic.  Can Eric, SHG or Steve et al explain why it’s so difficult to not take illegal drugs?  What’s the bet that cokeheads are the same sanctimonious urban leftys who protest about human rights and saving whales?  If they want to have a great Saturday night out then that’s a right and to hell with those who suffer for it.  The undeniable fact is that coke users are mass murderers by default and no blame shifting will change that.  We spend countless millions on attacking the supply of illicit drugs but do nothing about demand.  That’s the real problem.  An advertising campaign featuring someone snorting coke in a nightclub together with images of the mangled bodies of Mexican innocents would be a great start.  Similarly, Sweden is a great example of creative policies which work.  In Sweden addicts are compulsorily hospitalised and non-addicts are jailed.  The idea that you can’t change demand is absurd.  How many cokeheads would continue using if they had three months jail to think about the harm they are causing others?  Not many.  After all, it’s hard to have a great night out behind bars.

    • DR says:

      11:26am | 25/08/09

      Whilst the effects of marijuana on the human body are arguable, noone can dispute the danger posed by cocaine and amphetamines. If pro-dug legalisation supporters insist on linking all narcotics under a single umbrella, they can kiss their chances goodbye. Both mainstream society and medical science are against it.

    • stephen says:

      12:39pm | 25/08/09

      @ Dan.
      What I meant was that those guys shooting themselves, and everybody else, are on drugs themselves.  In my travels, unfortunately, I have come across a number of dealers and users- some big, some small - and they don’t keep their MBA on the mantelpiece.

    • SHG says:

      04:13pm | 25/08/09

      While alcohol and tobacco remain legal, anyone having a whinge about cocaine just looks ridiculous.

    • Blasted says:

      05:22pm | 25/08/09

      Rubbish article. Utter attention grabbing BS.
      I too have spent some time in Mexico, and the reality is drug use in Australia has ZERO to do with Mexican cartels. They aren’t the one’s who produce the stuff stupid.
      More like Columbia, Bolivia and Peru. I’m married to a South American, so might know more about it than the author.
      The Mexican’s just transship to the US.
      Do some research next time.

      Jeremy C Brown has obviously never met a junkie, or knows someone who died.
      So do I pal, and I reckon he would still be alive if he knew the precise strength and size of the dose which killed him. Might have given us time to get him help.
      Do you really think a junkie cares if they get three years in gaol, let alone three months?
      Wake up to yourself.
      Prohibition has never, ever worked, and this war will not be won.
      This has been tried and tested over many decades, across various “contraband”.

      What do you mean we do nothing about demand?
      If you get caught more than a couple of times, you would more than likely be looking at a custodial sentence unless you are welathy enough to hire a very good lawyer.

      Funny you mention Sweden, since when I was there a few years back I witnessed a junkie die on the street right in front of me.
      Yes, those policies sure are effective.

      Your idea of reality makes me think you’re the one on drugs (probably a prescription of some sort?).

      “Users are mass murderers by default”... I mean honestly, you really are a joke.
      The reality is, god bothering know it all’s, who feel the need to interfere and have control over others, such as yourself, who lobby to continue prohibiton are the mass murderers.
      Think about how many innocent bystanders, children and Police officers simply doing their jobs would still be alive if it weren’t for prohibition.
      Let me tell you it runs into many more than these little ‘wars’ we have on at the moment.
      On the other hand if they were legal with fixed doses, the people who were going to do them regardless of the law, would have precise levels of quality, and the taxes could be used to treat drug addiction for the illness that it is, rather than a criminal activity.

    • Témoris Grecko says:

      02:53am | 26/08/09

      @Steve Robinson. I’m a Mexican and I liked the focus of your comment. Anyway, I’m also a journalist covering these issues and I don’t agree with your statement that virtually none of the drugs you get in Oz comes via Mexico. Part of your supply is related to Mexico, as the capture of Mexican traffickers there proves. It actually doesn´t need to come via Mexico: because of the huge profits they get from illegal-drug buyers, they are taking over the business to local gangs in Central and South America, which in turn gives them greater profits. Someone else said that the European supply doesn´t have to do with Mexico, because it comes through Africa… where many other Mexican gang members have been captured or spotted. They are in Italy, too, colaborating with la N’dranghetta and la Camorra. This is something Blasted should be aware of, as convinced as he seems calling others stupid.

      The dangerous situation we are in comes from that;: the globalization of these bands has made them so much stronger, and so they can direct bigger flows of money to fight or buy our authorities.

      I support marihuana and soft drugs deprohibition. I have more doubts about   hard drugs, such as cocaine and heroine, but I think we have to discuss it and, on hard facts, decide what to do about it. Maybe decriminalize them too.

      There is a hard reality, anyway: whilst the drugs are illegal, they are the business of bloody murderers who are killing people. It doesn´t matter whether these people are Mexican, Afghan or any other nationality. At this time, the dollars you give to that cool mate the dealer end up in the hands of a Texan arms seller, or in the hands of a Central Asian or African warlord, or in the hands of a New York money-launderer, or in the hands of a Colombian sicario, the kill-for-a-fee guy.  Arguing whether buying dope at the rave kills people in Mexico or in Guinea is irrelevant, as it is to deny any responsability and denounce prohibition: the hard fact is that your money will help to kill someone, to buy a mayor in a tiny Michoacán town, to threaten the honest police officer in Thailand, to endanger the stability of entire countries.

      David put it like this: “A dignified and sophisticated country has gone totally off the rails”. I thank his view on Mexico and his article in general, but luckily, we are not totally off the rails. That is proved by the existence of a government which we criticize in many ways, but in this matter, it’s giving the fight.

      Fi wrote: “The good people of Mexico need support (from the US and their allies, read: Australia) and they need to step up their efforts to fight crime and injustice on their own turf”. Thanks for that one, Fi. I only would like to point out that the efforts have been stepped up (as those many thousands of deaths show), and we will do a lot more, because we, in the producing and/or transhipping countries, have a lot more to lose than anyone in the consumming countries. You might lose a lot in public health, we might lose our countries themselves.

      A last word: look at this same debate in any US website, and it’s full of racist crap. Take a look at the LA Times blogs, for instance. It’d be so much better if we could discuss this with our US neighbours in the way you guys have been dealing with the matter here.


      We all should keep that in mind.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @PSyvret: As if anyone needs reminding of the bigoted pond-scum out there, this arrived in my in-box this morning: http://t.co/Lfu5ntmq

Daniel Piotrowski

@christoforpaine hope youre OK.. and the bali trip is still on!

Paul Colgan

RT @BusInsiderAU: WATCH: Will Smith Does A Fresh Prince Rap Reprise On British TV - http://t.co/Filsoi00AT

Paul Colgan

ping @TheStalwart - Ireland looking at phasing out Apple's tax arrangements http://t.co/fZESvMZJsW

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter