I once encountered Peter Garrett on the way to Coober Pedy.

Wh's going to save me? Photo: Ray Strange

I was shooting down the Stuart Highway, several hours through a tough, dry, apocalyptic part of central Australia, when mine shafts, mounds and machinery appeared over the horizon. My iPod, running on shuffle, picked the mood perfectly: Blue Sky Mining.

On that day, the Midnight Oil frontman was in the right place at the right time. But since he entered politics, recruited by Mark Latham, Garrett’s timing has been off. Some of his strumbles are well-known: messing up the insulation scheme, or saying in front of Steve Price that Labor would ``change it all’’ if it won power. His responsibilities were first reduced in 2007, when Kevin Rudd handed responsibility for climate change to Penny Wong, a shrinkage later repeated when Greg Combet was asked to fix insulation. Now he’s lost arts too.

Julia Gillard still thinks Garrett has more to offer, handing him the schools portfolio in a clear vote of confidence for his abilities. So perhaps we shouldn’t be too harsh just yet. But she quietly handed responsibility for the arts to Simon Crean, a former Labor leader who will never been mistaken for a rock star.

The decision is a sensible one. In recent weeks, many in the arts community had been loudly agitating for his head. Make no mistake: Garrett’s standing in the sector was badly damaged.

Only a few years ago, those whose lives depended on the arts were feeling confident, quite reasonably too, that having one of their own on their side could only be a good thing. How times change.
Garrett managed to fumble the one caseload where most people would have expected him to thrive the most.

On the eve of Gillard’s reshuffle, his performance was described as a ``huge disappointment’’ by Live Performance Australia, the peak body for the nation’s live entertainment industry whose members include organisations like Opera Australia, Circus Oz, The Australian Ballet, state theatre companies and several rock promoters.

Its president, theatre producer Andrew Kay, had an intruiging insight, telling The Weekend Australian that Garrett’s passion for the arts was also his weakness. ``He’s almost a luvvie,’’ he said. Outspoken art dealer Dennis Saville went harder: ``We had crap with Keating, it was a disaster under Whitlam and now it’s diabolical under this guy.’‘

For a constituency that tends to favour Labor, at least in theory, many found themselves looking back with fond memories of life under John Howard. How did it come to this?

Labor’s cultural reputation began to unravel in May 2008, when Bill Henson became a headline. After police seized works by the renowned photographer from a Sydney gallery, Kevin Rudd described the works as ``absolutely revolting’‘. There were genuine issues to be debated, but many were alarmed by the strength of the Prime Minister’s condemnation. If artists expected Garrett to be more supportive, his response felt weak: ``While artists have a right to challenge and confront audiences,’’ he said, ``they also have a responsibility to operate within the law.’‘

Later, Labor announced funding would be cut to the Australian National Academy of Music, forcing it to close. Garrett later backed down after public pressure from ANAM’s artistic director Brett Dean, high profile violinist Richard Tognetti and others.

But as Saville’s comments show, it was in the world of visual arts that Garrett has truly taken a beating. The government’s resale royalty scheme, which meant most artists would get a cut when their works were sold down the line, was fine in theory. But gallery owners across Australia, from remote arts centres to major city galleries, were furious about the way it was implemented. A few days before it came into force, one respected figure said: ``It’s a catastrophe.’‘

Garrett said gallery owners had been given ample time to prepare. Others disagreed.

Around the same time, another issue threatened to become even more disruptive to those whose lives depended on art. The Cooper review into superannuation recommended that self-managed super funds be barred from owning art. This, according to many gallery owners, artists and collectors, would mean a huge drop in sales.

Garrett was looked upon to show leadership, to stick up for the industry, but he was largely absent from the debate. After several weeks of uncertainty, the government finally announced, after the Coalition promised the same, that it would not accept the recommendation after all.

Maybe he was constrained in cabinet, but Garrett’s voice was not being heard. Just as being an environmental activist didn’t prevent mis-steps in that portfolio, Garrett’s love for the arts did not automatically make him a capable arts minister.

But that’s politics, where real-world experience isn’t enough to make a thoroughly decent, hard-working, deeply considered man like Garrett an effective politician.

Garrett joined Labor because he wanted to make a difference from the inside. The arts seemed like an obvious choice, but perhaps he was just too close to the action. Besides, anyone who has seen rock or pop stars work a crowd _ be it Lady Gaga, Silverchair, U2 or Garrett himself _ knows that sometimes the best place to change the world is from the front of the stage.

Or maybe musicians just don’t have that much clout. Four years ago, at the ARIA awards in Sydney, on the same night that Bono praised Garrett, saying he felt ``a moral core at the heart of that man which is attractive in a time of crisis’‘, Silverchair’s frontman Daniel Johns used spraypaint to write something on the wall of the stage. His message? PG4PM.

Most commented

33 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Jb says:

      06:10am | 13/09/10

      Yeah and look at how these guys have ripped the guts out of the film industry too!
      While the Rudd/gillard govt was out there making sure their building and retail union mates were propped up with massive stimulus funds the film industry fell apart over night leaving thousands unemployed from the industry they love.
      Just oneida debacle to add to the many still to be revealed…

    • BobM says:

      11:29am | 13/09/10

      Those in the industry still vote Labor - don’t expect a different outcome if you keep doing the same thing.

    • Against the Man says:

      06:46am | 13/09/10

      Lets just home that unlike the insulation debacle (classic ALP screw up) no one gets killed as PG screws up education. I wouldn’t worry about PG, in the end his legacy is messed up beyond repair and history will remember him badly.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:00am | 13/09/10

      Ultimately , all turncoats ( remember Garrett’s Green party associations)
      adopted by Labor are tossed aside once their purpose has been fulfilled.
      Garrett will be no differrent.
      Gillard’s handing of the schools portfolio to the Midnight Oil man , has sent shivers down the backbone of the Education system throughout Australia.
      The insulation fiasco has left a terrifying memorial to Labor mismanagement.
      Something tells me that Simon Crean’s knowledge of the Arts is zilch , but i have a strong feeling that the Arts will be far better served by him rather than Peter Garrett.

    • Jolanda says:

      08:16am | 13/09/10

      I am sure that the Education Portfolio was given to Garrett on purpose. Garrett does nothing about anything so cover ups will be able to continue and the DET will continue to be protected.

      Education – Keeping them Honest
      http://jolandachallita.typepad.com/

    • Daniel says:

      08:47am | 13/09/10

      Peter Garret has sold his soul to Labor in so many ways. I have no idea how this guy can sleep at night. He should have joined the Greens but now they will never have him.

    • Adam DIver says:

      08:55am | 13/09/10

      Oh no not the arts! Please someone think of the children.

      Anyway if you promise someone a ministry with no political experience I wonder what you get. Garrett should of been cutting his teeth as a secretary for whatever portfolio before getting the top job, but hey he was a rock star.

    • John Walker says:

      08:59am | 13/09/10

      Your comment:Mr Garret did a reasonable job of implementing policys that were not good well thought out, ideas.
      The Home insulation scheme was really part of the stimulus package policy,  a ‘make work’ measure, a policy created by the PM/ Treasurer.

      The resale royalty (as implemented by Mr Garret) is a reasonable implementation of a intrinsically flawed idea. 
      The concept of the resale royalty/tax came out of the publicly funded arts sector , a sector that has no connection to (or understanding of) commercial reality. What the schemes advocates originally aimed at delivering was lots of management fees for the people advocating the scheme and lots of undeliverable royalties that could be redistributed.

      The Australian Constitution makes retrospective application a very big ask, Australia almost never dos retro law making.
      The scheme attempted to mix the very opposite concepts of a ‘royalty’ :individual commercial right and a ‘tax’ : individual public ‘duty’—the inevitable result is conceptually a paradoxical chimera.

      Except for a handful of artists who have sold a lot of art in the first place, Resale royaltys are of no benefit to most artists—- in the UK resale scheme just twenty artists have gotten P of all the money collected !
      The costs of these schemes will always be paid for by those who have the weakest market position; The young artist.-Art Buyers will either lower their offering price OR simply stop buying, there are plenty of alternative things to collect.

    • acotrel says:

      09:07am | 13/09/10

      Garrett lost me when he didn’t take control of the state OHS laws and legislate to control the way ‘grub’ contractors operate under the Commonwealth project administration!

    • Eric says:

      10:20am | 13/09/10

      Why is the government involved in the arts anyway? Wouldn’t taxpayers’ money be better invested in hospitals, roads and fighter planes?

    • Mat Lon says:

      10:54am | 13/09/10

      Kevin Rudd described the works as ``absolutely revolting’‘.

      I still remember this; me and my friend looking at each other and having a big LOLWAT moment….who was this Rudd guy we just voted in, and why weren’t we told he was a fuddy-duddy before voting for him

      I agree with Eric. There really should be no arts funding beyond education. The arts should sink or swim on their own merits, not propped up by tax payers.

    • John Walker says:

      11:32am | 13/09/10

      Mat I Agree.
      Though the Henson stuff was in the end was a storm in a tea cup -It was Rated G.
      It just happened to coincide exactly with the day of the sentencing of Milton Orkopoulos .  certainly diverted attention, no?
      ‘The only thing that a government can do for an artist is leave him/her alone.’

    • Greg says:

      12:22pm | 13/09/10

      “who was this Rudd guy we just voted in, and why weren’t we told he was a fuddy-duddy before voting for him”

      You were given fair warning. He resembled Howard in 2007 and it’s not his looks I’m talking about.

    • Denny says:

      11:37am | 13/09/10

      Garrett is being used by the ALP and when they are done with him he will be thrown to the wolves. A lost loss, a lost reputation and a lost cause.

    • Clare De Mayo says:

      11:50am | 13/09/10

      The trouble with Garrett as Arts minister is that he applied the ‘rock star’ model to all other art forms…a few stars who make it and make lots of money. This model has no respect nor understanding for the real arts COMMUNITY….from grass roots up, where you may have ‘moments’ of fame, but you have a lifetime of mostly low paid and very hard work….it’s a long term lifestyle. If you view the arts in THIS way, you see that there is a serious need for infrastructure eg low cost housing, studios spaces, tax smoothing, income support, regional centres etc etc…..not just schemes which support the big end of town. Programs such as this are implemented all over the world….tax relief for artists, income support schemes that acknowledge art-making as work, redeveloped housing complexes set up as arts centres. Australia is way behind the game when it comes to really supporting the arts. When oh when will we seriously have an Arts equivalent to the Australian Institute of Sport, with serious funding for emerging artists?

    • AdamC says:

      12:41pm | 13/09/10

      Clare, don’t some of your suggestions contradict each other? For example, how would an elitist model a la the AIS sustain the real arts COMMUNITY (emphasis yours) which rock star Garrett didn’t understand? Also, how would taxation perks benefit artists who, as you say, are very low paid?

      I generally agree with many commenters sentiment that the arts shouldn’t receive special government support. However, it is clear that , if you agree that there should be government funding, the question of how best to direct it remains vexed. Having said that, I don’t much like your angle, which seems to be about supporting the incomes of artists in a sort of welfare model.

      It would be much better to subsidise ticket and entry prices and let the cream rise to the top, rather than simply support the lifestyles of self-declared artists.

    • John Walker says:

      01:19pm | 13/09/10

      ‘Artist’ is not a moral classification (nor is it any other sort of real world classification) . Artists have no more intrinsic rights to housing, health care ,income support and so on than any other Australian citizen.  The money would be better spent on root canals for the poor.

    • John Walker says:

      01:53pm | 13/09/10

      AdamC
      Deductions for loss making activities are of great interest to the funded sector. There are lots of   funded arts management professionals who want to be able to deduct the costs of their ‘loss making’ artist sideline.  In the funded sector , paid artist = professional program manager.
      Almost all of the public money paid into the system is diverted to the management costs of the system. The ratio is roughly 12 million in management costs to pay out 2-3 million.

    • AdamC says:

      03:37pm | 13/09/10

      John Walker, what you are saying would seem to be a good argument for re-working the system away from direct funding and grants to a consumer-directed subsidy for tickets etc.

      And a BTW, I don’t see why dentistry is more worthy of funding that the arts. I suppose that is the problem with command economics.

    • Clare De Mayo says:

      05:12pm | 13/09/10

      Ok…first you have to accept a position which says the arts ...and therefore artists….are of value to our society, not just of ‘market’ value. That is…it is important to be reflective about ourselves, life, existence, or moral position etc etc, the arts has a central role in doing this (alongside philosophy and ethics courses and other such ‘non-essentials’ these days.
      Second it is important to understand that good art, like lots of other good things…takes time.  I am talking about a lifetime career….10, 20, 30, 50 years. Then there are logistics for nurturing the arts….just like sport, arts and artists need facilities….sports centres-arts centres, training facilities-studio spaces, sponsorship deals (being able to quit your ‘day’ job for a while)-scholarship programs.  A careful look at most arts funding structures will show that most of the money goes to already established artists, arts management (as noted by another poster) and some community based projects. Imagine if sportspeople only got funded after winning an Olympic Gold medal. Current arts funding is pretty close to that.
      Things like tax smoothing programs allow for short term windfalls (a successful exhibition) in the context of maybe 4-5 years with way below average income.
      Places like the Netherlands, Ireland, even Morocco have had programs like this…
      When I read a lot of the posts, it is clear that many people think of the arts as an added extra, not really essential.
      Well I guess it is Australia :-(
      As I said before, no one would dream of regarding football in the same way.

    • John Walker says:

      12:03pm | 14/09/10

      Adam   The point is that offering medical/dental treatment because they are poor and in pain is very different to handing out money on the basis of a self description as an ‘worthy’ deserving ‘artist’.

      What to do about it is beyond me, I left the government system decades ago . A very big problem with the current system is that it depends upon pier review , something that is inherently conservative , circular and anti innovation .  The boards are very ossified and dominated by academics of a certain age.

      Clare virtually all of the money goes to Management.
      ( Successful artists are artists who have a paying audience.)

      Because almost anybody can call them selves an ‘artist’ it is impossible to publicly fund artists,  and thus the money is spent on deciding who of the potentially millions of applicants gets a few thousand dollars every now and then.

    • John Walker says:

      12:05pm | 14/09/10

      Clare income averaging is an allowed practice right now.

    • Henry A says:

      01:42pm | 13/09/10

      Never has someone been more self righteous and made more noise then been an utter dud when given the reins as this man.

      An epic fail of epic proportions.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:11pm | 13/09/10

      Remember when he acted like an idiot during the 2000 Sydney Olympics with his ‘Sorry’ T-shirt. Why isn’t he wearing one now? Isn’t he sorry about the insulation deaths? Welcome to Labor country baby smile

    • martinX says:

      01:48pm | 13/09/10

      “Julia Gillard still thinks Garrett has more to offer”. No she doesn’t. She thinks his presence can still attract the votes of a few rusted on Midnight Oil fans and ditching him might seem a little too obvious right now. By having a “schools” portfolio he mightn’t ruin too much.

      BTW, what is a “schools” portfolio? Schools are buildings that have litle to do with education policy. Who does he liaise with? Janitors?

    • neil says:

      04:17pm | 13/09/10

      Garratt was hung out to dry by Rudd, pushed into a senior poition without spending enough time as a parlimentary secretary to learn the ropes, dumped with illconceived policy then made the fall guy when it all went pear shaped.

      I’m not convinced he is up to education but he does deserve a chance to prove himself.

    • Northern Steve says:

      08:28pm | 13/09/10

      Why does he deserve a chance to prove himself?  Surely schools are more important than Garrett’s political career.

      For a sector that is apparently so important to Gillard, why would she put in charge of it someone who has so far dramatically failed at everything else so far?  My guess is that she used education as her base to become PM, and now doesn’t care.  She certainly doesn’t understand education.

      I know when Garrett’s appointment was talked about in the staffroom today, reactions were either an out-loud laugh, or a shaking of the head.

    • B. Green says:

      04:32pm | 13/09/10

      Gazza,s got the stitch,get him off the ground,the press dog,s are barking,it makes sense,he was never suited to stage left,he,s more your front man,we loved the songs,but not the dance.

    • Bob H says:

      07:47pm | 13/09/10

      Do our school children have to suffer just because Gillard want to hang around the guy that sang some songs she danced to in her university days?. Private education here come kids (yes I know you’ve a new hall, but he might put insulation in it),

    • acotrel says:

      10:59pm | 13/09/10

      Can Tony Abbott sing, or play a musical instrument?  He’s great BS artist, but can he do anything else? I heard he was taking acting lessons - he’ll probably support a bipartisan approach to the arts?

    • Billy Whiz says:

      09:00am | 14/09/10

      Can Mr Garret sing and dance? not from the old videos I’ve seen

    • Mr Pastry says:

      10:45am | 14/09/10

      Peter Garrett has kept a ministerial position because he took the fall for Habib who was the ‘brains’ behind the roof insulation initiative and was all out for getting the credit for it until…...  Garrett has proved himself as a politician, no shame, no responsibility, no clue, but boy what a pension.

    • John Walker says:

      01:55pm | 14/09/10

      Mr Garret is a sincere intelligent morally principled, good man.
      The problems that beset these programs were common to many other programs the government initiated : a very narrow ‘technica’l focus and little design from first principles that when combined with a lack of enough knowledge of reality,  resulted in real world recursive irony ;  things that did not turn out as expected .

      The funded visual arts sector ‘advice/ lobbying’ that over the past decade shaped much of labor arts policy was offered in deep conflicts of interest and moral hazard.

      Above all this advice was based in ignorance of the real visual arts sector.  The upper echelons of the funded sector( in the viz arts)  over the past twenty years became so good at excluding the voices of anybody from outside of the huddle that they completely lost touch with reality. The sector became little more than - A hall of mirrors as frozen as Narcissus, as hard to see as Echo, signifying bugger all.
      the

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@wheels002 @janecat60 Prefer your son's excellent turtle.

Malcolm Farr

“@JoeHockey_MP: Expect #insiders to be a doddle tomorrow." @latingle @dwabriz& I can't agree whether to call u genius or genius AND saint.

Daniel Piotrowski

@Rob_Stott ... But don't go to Awaba unless you're a local because they'll treat you like a subhuman

Malcolm Farr

Some people are so worried re sexuality of others hard not to think they might have probs with their own . http://t.co/c2Lvg3FJP0

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter