Another highly instructive sex survey has been released out of Britain.

The Sex and the City chicks. Possibly the only ones guaranteed to fulfill criteria for the sex survey

According to a world-wide survey of 15,000 women, Germans are the worst lovers with Englishman, Swedes, Dutch and Americans rounding off the worst five. Spanish, Brazilians, Italians and French were rated the best in bed, with Australians rated the seventh best.

By my reckoning to have participated in this survey a woman would have had to have slept with at least one man from every country assessed.

So say you’ve slept with a Mexican instead of an American or Belg instead of a Dutchman, it doesn’t make the cut.

Furthermore to get any kind of reasonable sample size they would have had to have had sex with, let’s say at minimum, two from each of those countries.

That’s a minimum of 40 men from 20 countries, and they have to all be from countries on the list.

Without wanting impugn the virtue of the women and others who took part in this survey it would be pretty extraordinary if one of them, let alone the supposed thousands that took part in this survey, had slept with a man from every one of the countries and a requisite amount to draw any kind of conclusion about who was better in bed.

So what’s my point? That sex surveys such as these lack the scientific rigour of the national census? Well so what.

Yes indeed, so what.

But the interesting point about sex surveys is our on-going fascination given that it’s so obvious it deals with a subject that is pretty impossible to generalise about and merely pander to stupid stereotypes about different people and nationalities.

According to the defining characteristic of the bad performing Germans was that they were “too smelly”(this is for a British audience remember), the English were “too lazy” (that oughta put a rocket under the lazy buggers) and Americans too dominating (well enough said). 

On the “best performing side” we may as well have just said “core those Latin types are hot innit” and illustrated it with a cartoon of a bloke with a rose in his mouth with chest hair protruding through his black silk shirt while dancing the tango.

It’s amazing what we’ll try and take from some of these things.

Last month one was released that showed men who had younger wives lived longer despite not looking at any other factors that might come into play with these men: like they could be richer and healthier.

Others included red heads have more sex, men think about football more than sex, most men have paid for sex: you can find at least one doing the rounds most days.

So why do we read these stories about stupid surveys that we should be able to tell from the outset that are complete bullshit?

Cause we like legitimising ways to read about sex, similar to the way you just waded through this I guess.

8 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • MR says:

      04:14pm | 30/09/09

      You should have called this column “I don’t understand market research, degrees of freedom, sampling methodology, statistics or any of that kind of stuff.”

    • acker says:

      04:25pm | 30/09/09

      Australian’s 7th best FIGJAM & Built for Comfort

    • jokemaker says:

      04:33pm | 30/09/09

      What’s the difference between heaven and hell?

      In heaven, the:
      - Engineers are German;
      - Police are English;
      - Chefs are Italian;
      - Lovers are French; and
      - People who organise all the events are Swiss

      In hell, the:
      - Engineers are French;
      - Police are German;
      - Chefs are English;
      - Lovers are Swiss; and
      - People who organise all the events are Italian

    • kayode galaxy says:

      07:15pm | 30/09/09

      The difference is that hell is too bad and heaven is full of lives.

    • justin says:

      10:34pm | 30/09/09

      Actually, I only read it because it my fiancée was looking my shoulder and saw it.

    • Charles says:

      12:45pm | 01/10/09

      On your point of statistical accuracy: I would offer that the women sampled would have had to ‘sample’ the same sampling of men - i.e. there should be two men from each country that would be shagged by the 15,000 women(or reasonable subset thereof).  The mind boggles.  Just musing here - how would you interview/audtion candidates for the job and who would conduct this?

      Now advertise that job on line and you may have found your new, ‘Best job in the World’ (BJITW) promotion.  Given the value of free airtime that the BJITW received, odds on this would get more.

      That means the survey company (an online entity in this instance) would generate one heck of an awareness of their services - fabulous marketing and branding for them.  Sceptical as I am, I think that is what this survey is all about and the results and their merits don’t bear discussion.

    • Charles says:

      12:59pm | 01/10/09

      Looking at the list and the reasons I note that the English are considered 2nd worst, ‘they are too lazy’.  Now is that reason any surprise?  Just reinforces the view of the POMS, as a race, embodied in the slight that they are ‘nothing but a bunch of dole bludgers’. 

      This survey demonstrates that the men perform ‘on the job’ as well as they go ‘about the job’.

    • AFR says:

      02:09pm | 01/10/09

      What they need is for us lads to be surveyed on women. I think Aussie girls would ge ta rude shock.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Weekend Punch: Tea or coffee?

Weekend Punch: Tea or coffee?

This is the week that Craig Thomson defended himself in Parliament, Schapelle Corby got clemency and…

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter