If Kevin Rudd made a New Year’s resolution he could have done worse than vow in 2010 to only say something is his number one priority if indeed he really means it.

But to do so would throw a spanner in the works of the Labor spin machine, which remains obsessed with the 24-hour news cycle and opinion polls. A quick search reveals that Mr Rudd has nominated more than half a dozen issues as his supposed number one priority over the past two years and there are probably more. This tally does not include climate change which he of course described as “the great moral challenge of our generation”.

It would seem Mr Rudd’s top priority changes according to the issue of the day that is running in the media, or the audience he is addressing. It is an extremely cynical practice and the most absurd thing is he must think nobody notices.

On 22 December when Mr Rudd launched the Chris O’Brien Cancer Centre, a very worthy initiative, the PM was under pressure over his election pledge to move to take over the public hospital system if its performance did not dramatically improve.

To defuse the situation, he responded by declaring that health was the government’s “priority number one”, therefore giving the impression of ongoing vigilance and action. In isolation a large number of Australians would give the Government a big tick for nominating health as its top priority.

However, just 12 days earlier when announcing the new National Security College Mr Rudd claimed a safe and secure Australia “is the Government’s first priority”, yet on 5 November he told the ABC’s Jon Faine that managing the global financial crisis was “first priority”.

In the space of six weeks, Mr Rudd nominated three number one priorities. But if you look back to March, he got up in front of ACCI and declared that jobs were “our first national priority”.

Rewind to 11 February 2008 when Reserve Bank warnings about rising inflation were the story of the day the PM said his “number one priority would be the war against inflation”. In November 2008, when unemployment was on the rise, he told Parliament how he regarded “war on unemployment as the Government’s highest priority”.

And who can forget all Mr Rudd’s rhetoric and grand-standing about his supposed education revolution. Following his election in 2007 he said education was in fact “agenda item number one”.

What Mr Rudd’s ever-changing feast of top priorities demonstrates is that saying anything in a bid to remain popular is the real number one issue on this Prime Minister’s list.

This approach is simply not sustainable over the longer term and for Mr Rudd the cracks continue to appear as he gains a reputation for all talk and no action.

His discredited Grocery Watch and Fuel Watch schemes are symbolic of the Rudd style as are his wars on everything from binge drinking and homelessness to gambling. Generating cheap slogans which attract headlines, but lead to no actual outcomes are hallmarks of this Government.

Some footage surfaced on Melbourne Cup Day which perfectly illustrated Mr Rudd’s cynical attempts to take advantage of the day’s story to guarantee a run on the nightly news.

The Prime Minister is filmed waving his betting ticket around and yelling out to be certain that everybody knew he was on the Cup winner. He then swigs from his stubby of XXXX, but only when he is certain the moment is captured by the cameras.

On a different day drinking and gambling are vices to be condemned by a self-righteous Mr Rudd, but during the ‘race that stops a nation’ they become handy props when there is a picture opportunity too good to miss.

The fatal flaw with Labor’s brand of retail politics is the way it unravels at the seams when tough decisions have to be made and the time comes when the thought bubbles have to be converted into workable policy.

We have seen this in the Government’s policy-on-the run approach to broadband, its weakening of border protection, including its chaotic handling of the Oceanic Viking episode and the failure of its deeply flawed CPRS, which appeased nobody and has been exposed as the giant tax that it is.

The failure of the Copenhagen conference to produce a binding global consensus on tackling climate change also exposed the folly of the Prime Minister wanting to lock Australia in to his CPRS ahead of the rest of the world. A decision which would have increased the cost of living for all Australians and undermined our nation’s economic competitiveness for next to no reduction in global CO2 emissions.

There is no doubt that Mr Rudd’s determination to pass the CPRS in advance of the world had nothing to do with our national interest and everything to do with his own vanity.

Despite having been elected more than two years ago, many Australians remain unclear about what our chameleon of a Prime Minister really stands for and with so many supposed number one priorities and a short-term political strategy to try and please everybody, he has only himself to blame.

100 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Tani says:

      05:00am | 07/01/10

      Very fair comment I reckon.  All talk and no action is what makes our government these days.  Makes it pretty easy for corporate lobbyists to run the country instead (to our shame).

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      05:14am | 07/01/10

      What does Krudd stand for? It depends on the day. Nobody got a look at that ticket though. Funny thing is he had one for each horse in the field. What a clever prime minister we have got.

    • Shane says:

      06:58am | 07/01/10

      He’s proving to be number one in the number two business.

    • Anna says:

      07:13am | 07/01/10

      How does he remain so popular in the polls? He is nauseating. Hopefully now with Tony Abbott as Leader of the Libs we will now have an alternative, looking forward to 2010. Time to expose this weak show pony excuse of a PM.

    • Phil says:

      07:21am | 07/01/10

      Nick spot on comments.

      Prime Minister Rudd is all talk and no action, problem is many rusted on lefties cannot see this, but alas, Tony Abbott Barnaby Joyce the rest of the opposition and yourself are going to hold them to account.

      On behalf of my family and many others, thank you for having the back bone to stand up to Rudd/Turnbull and Wong on the ETS thus far.

      Keep up the fight.

    • iansand says:

      07:21am | 07/01/10

      Spot on.  You are absoluely correct, Senator, and this behaviour should be exposed and denigrated wherever and whenever it appears.  Including from the Liberal, Green, National, Family First and all other spin machines.  The best thing for the development of policy in this country would be to move from ideas expressable in a news grab to proper debate.

    • Jimmy says:

      07:25am | 07/01/10

      Kevin Rudd is doing a good job, he has so many number 1 priority’s because he’s got to fix up all the liberals mistakes they made. He will be a Prime Minister for a long long time. He’s put us on the world stage, because of all his overseas travel and talking to other leaders. He is respected all over the world.

    • Hermit says:

      07:15pm | 22/01/10

      Oh dear. Jimmy, have you really missed the point that by definition you can only have ONE number one priority? Or possibly have I failed to appreciate the subtlety of your wit?

    • Darren says:

      10:31am | 04/02/10

      @Hermit, it was a cheap shot at the Libers that Jimmy just could not avoid smile

      I love how politics (like anything) has fanboys, yet it is by far the most important aspect of our lives; if you have any forsight than you realise political choices you make now (@Jimmy) affect your life and your future hopes/dreams for decades. That is because a little thing like a “stimulus” package deals decades of *effects* that i dare say are damaging to an other-wise unscaved economy thanks only to it’s self imposed nature (that’s right Australia’s economy during the GFC was very much safe without a stimulus).

      My point is Jimmy, every time you view a political issue, take (at best) a neutral stand point or atleast one that benefits you yourself above anyone else. Favouring Labour or Liberal does not mean that they will turn around and give you your hopes/dreams on a silver platter. You must critically examine the aspects of both parties proposed/possible cabinets, not just their leaders, regarding any issues that you are concerned about. Climate change your main issue? vote liberal. Economy your main issue? vote liberal. Social benefit/development your main issue? vote labour. Geo-politics your main issue? vote labour. etc. etc. etc. etc.

    • Super D says:

      07:25am | 07/01/10

      The problem is an uncritical media.  Every time Rudd announces a new top / number 1 priority he should be questioned as to why the previous number 1 has been pipped by this new problem and if he will be disbanding all the committees he set up to examine the previous top issue.

    • jacketts says:

      10:43am | 03/02/10

      good point superd. the media seem to give krudd a free pass whenever he opens his mouth, we really need someone to question him, but then he would put us to sleep with his empty blather.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:28am | 07/01/10

      Anna says @ 0813hrs,

      “How does he remain so popular in the polls?’  Because there is no viable opposition, thats why.

      All these debates miss the real issue the people have lost what little control of our parliament we ever had. I don’t know what form of government we live under, but I do know it’s not a democracy.  It is more a modern form of war lords and tribalism. The rusted on warriors line up every day to run out their old slogans and war chants. The high priests of the media fire up their war lord’s armies based on their allegiancies.

      Just go back over the last few months and read, what ever the topic, it’s the same old, same old.

      Sad to see democracy die, isn’t it?

    • Ariel says:

      07:29am | 07/01/10

      It’s good to read an article by a politician without political spin for a change, just the facts.  Abbott for PM.

    • des says:

      07:32am | 07/01/10

      I do not have to know exactly what Rudd stands for. His leadership is evolving as is/was the case for all previous Prime Ministers. My perception though is he is a person of some principle and he is faced daily with public scrutiny that will ‘test’ him.  However, I do know what Minchin stands for and I do not like it.

    • Hermit says:

      07:17pm | 22/01/10

      Are you sure that Mr Rudd is evolving, or did you leave a letter off and mean to say revolving?

      Does Mr Rudd ever return to his previous number one priorities or does each one get its proverbial 15 minutes of fame?

    • Chris says:

      07:56am | 07/01/10

      I made this comment in another article a few days ago and I think it is appropriate in this article as well.

      For me my Rudd moment was at last year’s SCG test where the first ‘Pink’ day for the McGrath foundation took place. During the day, Glenn McGrath was in the stands and received (deservedly) a rousing standing ovation from not only his home crowd but Australians in general. He was there receiving the adulation and guess who was next to him holding Glenn’s hand up and waving as well? - Kevin Rudd!  What was wrong with giving Glenn his moment in the sun and standing back from Glenn.
      The man has no shame.

    • coxie says:

      07:59am | 07/01/10

      I concur, wholeheartedly with you senator, even though I was also born in the same convict-less, settled state in the Commonwealth. So far (to 8.21am), there’s no ‘leftie’ comment, which may ‘speak’ volumes for the facts-of-the-matter.

    • Jane says:

      08:00am | 07/01/10

      Absolutely spot on Nick.
      History will reveal this KRudd/Labor to have been the Greatest Australian Con of all time.

    • Nuella says:

      08:00am | 07/01/10

      Where is Rudd since Nopenhagen anyway? Still recovering?

    • Hermit says:

      07:19pm | 22/01/10

      Anybody can see Mr Rudd is not well.

      If Tiger Woods can go into rehab for sexual addiction, perhaps there is a clinic Mr Rudd can attend.

    • jamie says:

      08:00am | 07/01/10

      A very good overview of the Rudd prime ministership thus far. A person full of ideas but with absolutely no idea how to implement them and even less inclination to follow anything through, relying more so on spin and double speak to explain away the reasons why nothing is really being done.

      And the media must take a lot of blame for this by their apparent reluctance to question him.

    • Paula says:

      08:02am | 07/01/10

      Abbott and the Libs can win this “unloseable” election. Go Tony! Expose the Phoney!

    • shane says:

      08:03am | 07/01/10

      ALL politicians have only ONE nbr one priority, and thats re-election. Don’t try to paint your position as anything more then partisian drivel aimed at that. Unless you’re talking about your holly war against the global climate change conspiracy. You and all your ilk, left, right and centre make me sick. The worlds worse for the likes of all of you.

    • Rita says:

      08:09am | 07/01/10

      Stay out there on the news in the papers on the air every chance you get Tony, because the more people see of you, the more people will see the real Kevin Rudd. Make Rudd come out and defend himself for a change, instead of hidding behind his Ministers. Lets see this year how popular this arrogant, little nerd really is.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      08:19am | 07/01/10

      Tell you what Shane @ 9.03am. Scratch out the authors name and replace it with any other commentator and you would have to agree with every word that was written. Could someone please direct me to any error in what the Senator has written? It is a very factual piece. Shame the media in this country don’t see it the same way. One sided reporting is now the norm.

    • Isabella says:

      08:23am | 07/01/10

      Its a shame one of the only Liberal politicians with a brain… doesn’t have a soul.

      I will never forget that four corners interview. It was the day Nick Minchin killed the Liberal Party.

    • Kiara says:

      08:25am | 07/01/10

      Hey Nick, has Turnbull been offered a job by Rudd yet?

    • Jinty says:

      08:29am | 07/01/10

      Time to chew Rudd up and spit him out. Abbott is far more palatable than this vane goody two shoes, your time has come Kevy, put down your tiara and move over.

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      08:32am | 07/01/10

      This is a repeat screening of the Carr/Iemma/Rees/Kennealy NSW Labor Government. The art of masterfull inactivity. Quietly pandering to favoured minorities, fiddling at the edges, ducking major reform on structural issues, recycled major announcements, piggybacking where possible on other’s achievements and spending to avoid short term inconveniences. The Oracle of this method of Government, Sen. Arbib is K Rudd’s new bestie so you don’t need to be Einstein to join the dots.

      This year we will find out if Australia continues to be happy with this form of Govenment like they are in NSW. If the Rudd Government is re-elected one should study the achievements of the second and third terms of the Carr Government as a yardstick for the progress of the country and the electoral success that it brings.

    • Valery says:

      08:39am | 07/01/10

      Lets hope in 2010 with Abbott as Leader the media can put some pressure on Rudd during interviews and make him actually give answers instead of spin. The media seem to like putting the opposition on the spot, well it’s time to put dear Kevin on the spot this year. Lets see if he is as good as he and his robots tell us. I hear things aren’t all that rosey in the Labor camp behind closed doors. I wonder how long it will take before some of his own party start breaking ranks as they too become tired of his arogance and importance.

    • Steve Smith says:

      08:41am | 07/01/10

      Same comment can be made about every government in power in every country, whether you cry over spilt milk or accept the fact you don’t really have control over what the government does, just depends on who you voted for.

    • Jamers Hunter says:

      08:51am | 07/01/10

      nick,concidering thes mess you good old guys left my guess is that the prime minister must have a whole lot of “number one priorities”

    • Rufus says:

      08:54am | 07/01/10

      Thanks Nick for this piece. Of course, I cannot take it as an unbiased report (you ARE the opposition) but it’s interesting to see Rudd and his useless words being analysed in the commercial media. I agree with the commenters here who say that this media needs to take a more critical approach to reporting the news - asking Rudd why he’s changed his “number one priority” would be a great start.

      I appreciate your work in condemning Labor’s internet censorship plan, but why the Liberals don’t openly mock it and point out the flaws (including sending out standard “wait and see” form letters) suggest to me that your party will happily deride Labor but not remove such a draconian measure. It would be a guaranteed way of gaining a hell of a lot of votes, but any incumbent political party will benefit. Sort of like what Rudd did with WorkChoices - watered down perhaps, but not totally remove.

      As with John A Neve and Shane (comments above) I for one think this country is being destroyed slowly and painfully by this two party political system we have, and feel that voters need to look outside Labor/Liberals when going to the polls. There are alternatives.

      I like how you personally do your politics, but being part of the Liberals means that you will lose my vote.

      Kepp hammering Rudd though. He’s a complete tool.

    • Kelley says:

      09:01am | 07/01/10

      James Hunter - the funny thing is Rudd has had more than 2 years to do something and has done little. Rudd and his Ministers are still blaming and talking about Howard. If he spent more time at home instead of swaning around the world looking for world popularity he might realise he is NOW the Prime Minister of Australia not the “world leader”.

    • Jana says:

      09:11am | 07/01/10

      @ James Hunter, the mess you good old guys left? Thanks to the Libs and the state of out economy before the GFC, Rudd got a free kick straight up. He and his party don’t like to acknowledge that fact. And he has so many mounting “number one priorities” because he can’t make a decision and fix anything in case it is an unpoplular decision he makes. Being Mr Popular doesn’t necessarily make you a good Prime Minister. There are tough decisions to make and Abbott is the man to do that. Bring it on Tony.

    • watty says:

      09:20am | 07/01/10

      Yes Mr.Hunter….that budget surplus just had to be spent as a “number one priority”.

      In recent days we have had the announcement of the Rudd “kiddies” (his words not mine) book,his BBQ skills and his” never ending love” of an ETS vying for “number one priority”

      Might I suggest that Rudd’s true “number one priority is his ever increasing EGOMANIA?

    • Elizabeth says:

      09:23am | 07/01/10

      Ahhhh, Nick Minchin. The most evil man in politics.
      It’s probably nice to see he’s removed the knife from his “mate” Malcolm’s back and is at least stabbing someone from the other side.
      How anyone can seriously take this “Labor spin” nonsense seriously is beyond me. The Liberals were masters at it. You don’t stay in Government for as long as Howard did without becoming a master of spin.
      Nick, the best thing you could do for your party and this country is to keep your mouth shut. Nothing you say has any credibility after the way you openly and selfishly decapitated Turnbull.

    • Kevin says:

      11:18am | 13/02/10

      Turnbull decapitated himself, by slavishly following KRUDD’s line.
      Labor under KRUDD makes few real decisions and stuff up those that they do make - witness the foil insulation scandal.
      The best thing you could do for this country, Elizabeth, is to educate yourself, and find out where the real spin and lies are coming from.

    • Jane says:

      09:30am | 07/01/10

      Jamers???? ‘the mess’ ??? Er, what ‘mess’ dear? Are you or were you in some kind of parrallel universe? Over the decade we enjoyed one of the highest standards of living Australia has experienced. The Coalition left a government surplus when most of the developed world was in debt…presided over the lowest unemployment rates for 34 years, inflation within the accepted band, 22% increase in real wages over the term, acceptably and comparatively low interest rates over the term, $96b of Labor’s previous government debt and the interest it incurred paid off, set up of the Future Fund to safeguard future superannuation…on and on.

      I’m tipping you’re of the generation never to have experienced the real hardship and folly under a Labor federal government….a whole generation that has never known ‘bad times’ in adult life….either that or you mindlessly spout ALP rhetoric and unsupported mumbo jumbo like a typical footsoldier….and probably ignorant enough not to be able to distinguish between Federal and State responsibilities as most are.

      Any ‘mess’ we are experiencing can be squarely placed at ‘do nothing’ Labor State government’s feet ....so far. You know…the ones responsible for administering Health and STATE Education ( that has conveniently been termed ‘public’ to obscure it’s direction of responsibilty)...policing, infrastructure, water, transport and most other ‘day to day’ immediate observances The very real Federal ‘mess’ evolving NOW will no doubt become apparent to you only in time. Then you’ll know what ‘mess’ entails. KRuddco have absolutely no clue. Word up.

    • Andrew says:

      09:36am | 07/01/10

      As the cricket finished a day early perhaps Krudd might spend sometime doing what he was elected to do…. Just a crazy idea.

    • Max Power says:

      09:38am | 07/01/10

      I guess with the mess Rudd is making, he has created a whole lot of number one prrorities.
      Rudd promised to fix up the ADF superannuation, not only has he failed to do what he promised, he has actually made things worse.
      He promised to take legal action against Japan over whaling, send the Navy and conduct aerial surveillance, all broken promises.
      Promised to deliver a national broadband network with the majority of the cost picked up by the private sector, broken promise.
      Promised transparency and accountability in govt, yet won’t answer any questions on the ETS. He denied abusing the RAAF Hostess even though his staff failed to order his special meal, and only fessed up when he could deny it no longer, and claimed I am only human.
      Promised decisive leadership, yet another broken promise.
      Claimed to be a economic conservative, yet here is Australia in record debt in record time due to his spending like a drunken sailor.
      Promised to put downward pressure on the cost of living, yet it keeps rising, another broken promise.
      He has turned Australia into an open door for economic refugees and turned Australia into the dumping ground for the rest of the worlds unwanted.
      Keeps stripping Australians of their rights and liberties. Refuses to implement a Bill of Rights to guarantee our rights and cancel the govt’s blank cheque to impose things like interent censorship on us.
      Promised to take over health if the state govt’s failed to improve after 18 months,another broken promise.
      So, I can see why there are so many number one priorities for Rudd, cause he doesn’t have a clue, makes $hit up as he goes, broken nearly all of his election promises, promised the world and delivered nothing.

    • RJB says:

      09:48am | 07/01/10

      If the opinion polls are to be believed, it can be attributed to true believer journalists whom have applied a negative media free exclusion zone around this fraud.

    • Anthony says:

      10:07am | 07/01/10

      “Mr Rudd’s top priority changes according to the issue of the day…”

      This is like stepping in to a boxing ring and complaining, “Aww, he keeps hitting me in the face!”

      You gotta come up with something better than that, Nick Minchin.

    • Carl Palmer says:

      10:10am | 07/01/10

      Thank you Senator Minchin and please continue to take it up to the government. Make an argument and force the debate. People will respect that. A good opposition makes for better government. There is a lot of rhetoric and unfortunately for this country nothing gets done. Many comments have been posted that acknowledge that there is very little substance in the government. If the promise was for example to take over hospitals, implement fuel watch, grocery watch etc etc - then the government should get on with the job.  But no, nothing, just review after review after review.

      One final observation – I thank the Australian people for allowing my home to be insulated. Unfortunately we / you were ripped off. I obtained three quotes and guess what all three came in at $1600. I can’t remember one example personal or professionally when all three quotes ended up been the same price. I then decided to get another three quotes after the rebate came down to $1200 and guess what all three came in at the same price.

      Moral of the story – there are no controls in place that ensure our taxes are spent in the most efficient way possible. That spending is thoroughly thought thru and treated as if it was their money. Furthermore, that the government throws money at a problem hoping that it will go away. Of further concern is that the government will throw money at an initiative eg NBN, Education, ETS / CPRS just to say “see it is now implemented”. No wonder the surplus is now gone.

      Once again, thank you Senator.

      PS – as an ex nipper parent, I can appreciate the good community work that Mr Abbott is doing patrolling the beaches. Why he gets criticised for looking like every other parent along the east coast of Australia performing water safety duties with the kids and patrolling the beach is beyond me. Please pass on my thanks, I appreciate what he is doing.

    • Darren says:

      10:43am | 07/01/10

      my number 1 priority would be to abolish the Senate - Keating was right - unrepresentative swill -

    • watty says:

      10:54am | 07/01/10

      Elizabeth I would suggest that the Turnbull egomania was the major cause of his political demise not “the most evil man in politics” Nick Minchin?

      His continued sniping at the Liberal Party after he lost Leadership truly displayed Turnbull’s political naivety and his inability to accept the decision of the Party.

      Still he could always promote himself as Australia’s first President when he gets the Republic up and running (another Turnbull cockup)?

    • Patrick says:

      10:56am | 07/01/10

      Shorter Minchin:

      A politician accusing another politician of spin.

    • ChrisG says:

      11:12am | 07/01/10

      Darren@11.43, we have one of the best political systems in the world, and the Senate is a key to its success. A stable lower house that forms government, based on single member electorates using distributed preferences, and a balancing Federal chamber based on proportional representation. The fact you may not like particular Senators from time to time, or the political balance in the Senate at any time, doesn’t warrant termination of the institution.

      In questioning the PM’s effectiveness against his rhetoric, Senator Minchin is doing the job a Senator is meant to do.

    • John A Neve says:

      11:32am | 07/01/10

      ChrisG says @1212hrs,

      “We have one of the best political systems in the world” and so it might be, however, is the system being used to it’s best and the people’s advantage?

    • Darren says:

      11:53am | 07/01/10

      ChrisG@12.12 - please explain to me how the Federal Chamber is based on proportional representation - for the 2007 election the quita for NSW was 599,034, for Tassie it was 46,693 - very fair and equitable!

    • Paul says:

      11:53am | 07/01/10

      A tired old refrain Nick - you’ve been saying the same thing since December 2007

    • Hermit says:

      07:35pm | 22/01/10

      Are you suggesting that Mr Minchin knew in advance of each of Mr Rudd’s number one priorities or was that just the best you could come up with?

    • ChrisG says:

      12:10pm | 07/01/10

      John A Neve, there are a couple of key elements in a good polity: strong civil society (we have that, and The Punch innovation is a great new aspect); balanced and robust institutions, we have those, including a great array of vertical accountability mechanisms to compliment the electoral process and our separation of powers; and good political leadership.

      On the latter, overall, as Paul Kelly has argued in his books, we have been well served. The jury is still out on the current Federal Government, although the signs are worrying - overblown rhetoric in key areas like health and indigenous policies, an unnecessarily large deficit that has undone the previous Government’s great contribution of eliminating debt and producing surpluses based on growth, first signs of not meeting much needed defence program targets, questionable capital priorities and management in education, counterproductive windback of industrial relations reforms of even the Hawke-Keating period, and indications at an early stage of a closed approach to scrutiny, in terms of FOI data.

      Of course, in NSW we lack any semblance of good political leadership, and fixed term legislation does not serve us well in that regard.

    • Jane says:

      12:13pm | 07/01/10

      “you’ve been saying the same thing since December 2007 “...consistently correct then.
      Facts don’t become ‘tired’....only to those who won’t acknowledge them.

    • ChrisG says:

      12:16pm | 07/01/10

      Darren, there is no question that the method of election to the Senate is based on proportional representation. As much as I have disagreed with the Democrats, Brian Harradine, and the Greens, it has allowed the views they represent to be represented in the Parliament in a way the lower house does not.

      Your gripe is with a federal system that balances the potential power of the large states by giving similar numbers of senators in a chamber meant to protect the Federalism that allowed us to become a single national entity. I think that is a compromise that is reasonable and has worked well.

    • PJ says:

      12:17pm | 07/01/10

      Without a Senate overview in Queensland ,we now have Manor Blight [Premier]  and her husband [ Climate Change CEO ]  just using their voting electotate as play tools. Imagine if you can boys and girls what it would be like, not to have a Federal Senate in place .Senator Nick Minchin is just doing his job as a committed Senator.I voted Labor but admit to being used.I am a horticulturist and work my property to try to sustain an income.My mother, long gone now ,instilled into her offspring the importance of achieving your best.I only wish those politicians representing my country could try to do the best for us and not just for themselves!

    • BULMKT says:

      12:39pm | 07/01/10

      Until Rudd won Government, I had hardly ever used the “mute” button on the TV remote.
      Now like our country, the mute button is now “broke”.

    • John A Neve says:

      12:48pm | 07/01/10

      ChrisG @ 1310hrs,

      I am aware of both our current and past government’s mistakes. What parties have done what is of little interest to me, rather i am concerned at the breakdown of our democracy.

      Much as I admire Paul Kelly, he isn’t always correct and I would disagree with his “good political leadership”. Over the last 30 years I believe it could have been a lot better.

      The “separation of powers’, has in the same period become less separated in my humble view.

      How can we claim to have a “balanced and robust” system when we are reduced to a two party system? Added to which often one of the two parties fails to stand a candidate?

      I’m also not happy that governments do all they can to circumvent our constitution and our GG allows it under the guise of past precedence.

      Sorry, but I have to disagree with your views opn this matter.

    • Hermit says:

      07:31pm | 22/01/10

      Any attempt to act contrary to the Constitution would surely be a matter for the courts, not the Queen’s representative.

    • Derek says:

      01:26pm | 07/01/10

      Darren - furthermore there is a requirement for all states to have a minimum of 5 MPs.  Given the Senate delivers equal representation to each state, I concur with you that Tasmania is incredibly over-rated.  Given the number of voters in Tassie I wuold have thought 3 MPs rather than 5 would have been enough.

      As for Minchin’s article - brilliant.  Good on you for bulldozing Turnbull.  To lead you must take people with you - Turnbull failed badly with this.

    • Bob H says:

      01:36pm | 07/01/10

      Rudd has the same priority as all politicians - to get elected.  Everything else is window dressing purely there to tempt the punters vote. If you think otherwise - well aren’t you an easily led voter.  Rudd may loose the next election but it will be because we are fed up with him and his failures and not because there is are strong policy alternatives waiting in the wings.  Our democracy is an idea free, closed shop, formal process that benefits only politicians keen to get into history books.

    • Arios says:

      01:46pm | 07/01/10

      When will crime/thuggery/bashings become the number 1 priority???

    • Murray G says:

      02:02pm | 07/01/10

      Well said Senator Minchin, good to see somebody writing about the lack of substance in the Rudd Government, this article is similar to your address to the senate a few months ago if I can recall. I’m only young (19) but I’ve been a follower of the Liberals for some time, and have recently received my membership papers. Unfortunately for me I live in Batman (Martin Ferguson’s seat) and we don’t get a Liberal party member running, I’ll agree there is no point in running in this electorate if you aren’t centre-left, just a pity that I can’t help at home.

      Anyway as for some of the opinions voiced saying this piece is laced with Right wing bias, well if this wasn’t written by a senior Liberal, than would they say elsewise?
      Minchin being a conservative could only put up with Turnbull for so long, Turnbull was at best a good leader, but he lacked political nouse, Minchin is a senior Liberal cabinet member, his say has a lot of pull as far as I’m aware. Turnbull dug himself a hole “I will not lead a party that doesn’t support an ETS” or something to that measure, that was the beginning of the end, and when Minchin publicly refused to back it, that was it, the conservatives were waking from their slumber, and the public backed them.

      There was no back stabbing, merely a light push into Turnbull’s pre dug hole. Abbott for PM!

    • Jane says:

      02:05pm | 07/01/10

      Bob…don’t paint all politicians with ‘Rudd’s’ brush therefore letting him off the hook here and downplaying the very extraordinary deceit. He has become ABNORMALLY full of it. A master Bullsh$*tter and true deceiver. The epitomy of ALP mantra.

      Arios…when the States budget more towards putting on more police and the necessary resources needed..as they pledged to do and therefore lied about.
      Bracks promised 900 ‘extra’ police for Victoria in 1999 ( not just covering attrition rates as they also failed to do)....proven to be all lies after 10 years ...added to the thousands of other lies and failings..but the electorates allow them to continue to do so.

      No doubt Rudd will also put it at yet another no 1 priority regardless of level of responsibility eventually…if it gets him a popular media soundbyte in the 24hr cycle it becomes an issue in…just give him time…it’s on the ‘list’....as is anything else that ingratiates himself.

    • Darren says:

      03:21pm | 07/01/10

      Derek and ChrisG - abolish the Senate and have multi-member lower house seats - Minchin would struggle to get elected in a real electorate

    • cats says:

      03:57pm | 07/01/10

      You people are hilarious. It’s almost too sad to be funny. This is what all of you acted like when Rudd was the opposition. You elected him. Now that he’s the one in power, you go back to liking the same government you voted out. And when they are in, you’ll be praising the labor opposition. I don’t vote either party, so I can say this all without hypocrisy. You are all sheep and your opinions are all subject to the media.

    • Jane says:

      04:11pm | 07/01/10

      cats???...excuse me?  I can tell you I NEVER elected this deceiving ‘b’ grade actor moron….let alone EVER voting for or ‘liking’ Labor….there’s plenty of documented evidence pre election to verify that ...hahhahaha….and I’m tipping neither did most of those here lambasting him vote for the dweeb either….

      It’s more an exercise of ‘TOLD YOU SO’ than anything else.
      The only ‘hilarity’ here is prompted by just how juvenile and naive YOU are on that score. wink

    • Bruce says:

      04:34pm | 07/01/10

      If everything is a “no.1” priority, then that means there is no priorities !!  Kevin Rudd reminds me of the days when Bob Carr was Premier of NSW. Lots of feel good promises that eventuated into nothingness. Look at NSW now, a living joke, with a hand puppet in control.

    • stephen says:

      04:49pm | 07/01/10

      The number one priority for the Labor Party is to keep the Liberal Party the number two priority.

    • RM52 says:

      04:49pm | 07/01/10

      All this is well & good & without doubt Krudd deserves to given the same treatment Keating got in the end ,but while all the distractions are trotted out I wonder what is happening in the case of Stern Hu,still locked up in China but seemingly forgotten by our press. Can someone tell me how many houses have been built in the remote areas of the N.T after all this time,as I say its distraction after distraction,One more thing,I am heartily sick of watching Question time being deliberately reduced to farce by those that are elected to govern , both Parties are equally at fault ,its time for an independant speaker that has the wherewithall to insist that the relevant minister ANSWER THE BLOODY QUESTION !!!!!!! .enough already.

    • PJ says:

      05:03pm | 07/01/10

      Who are you cats? People have expressed an opinion.I have never met a person demonstrably of the left who has ever earned a living without having their nose in the trough.Are you one of them?

    • Mikko says:

      05:35pm | 07/01/10

      Good one Nick, what a pity we don’t here Kevin say his number one priority in 2010 will be to stay home more than a couple of weeks at a time and concentrate on some of the REAL issues he has mentioned are his number one priority. Health, which he promised to fix in 2007, would be a good place to start but that doesn’t win any brownie points on the world stage he loves to strut. Meanwhile the rest of the world saw this little Mouse that Roared (Squeaked?) at Copenhagen and is still asking, Kevin who? From Where?

    • Roy says:

      05:46pm | 07/01/10

      Correction…......lazy, biased media who do not put him on the spot. We need Hannity and O’Reilly types over here so why doesn’t a local want to make a name for him/herself and reveal the details.

    • Louisa says:

      06:34pm | 07/01/10

      KRudd only number One priority is himself.

    • Jamers Hunter says:

      06:56pm | 07/01/10

      Jane, what a busy bee today, sorry to say though my age is 63 so i remember what menzies didnt do for education and the scare mongering about the yellow peril and i remember the best liberal pm ,john gorton , stabbed in the back. so you see i do remember the liberals of old ,oh and milkem fraser from a land of milk and money telling the battlers that life wasnt ment to be easy. the gaul of the man. i also remember what whitlam did for education and health car and keating freeing up the exchange rate ...oh i could go on but you you would not hear ??

    • Your name: Jane the elder & original says:

      01:06pm | 13/02/10

      I’m also 63 Jamers and I remember Menzies also, I met the man when he opened our brand spanking new, top line, public high school.  My husband also had a yarn to him at the Black Mountain tip when Bob was taking the rubbish out of the boot of the Roller. I remember being inspired by Menzies breaking down the White Australia Policy.  I remember voting for the Fraser Brothers (ALP) in the ACT until the backroom boys got into the act and shafted Allan big time and tried the same stunt on Jim.  Gorton was a nice man but hardly our best ever PM.  I remember the ALP introducing (with Comrade Whitlam) the Multi-Cultural Policy - if they couldn’t keep Aussies arguing over the White Australia Policy the best way was to cement cultural and racial differences rather than welcome new people, new ideas and new foods into the country and let it wash into a chesive society hey Jamers?  Here we are again, back to the politics of envy and class/race wars, back to throwing money at every problem rather than facing the problem and finding solutions.  I had hoped the ALP may have matured but it seems that isn’t the case. Hypocrisy and sef aggrandisement reigns.  Not much to be proud of there I think!

    • Marie says:

      07:13pm | 07/01/10

      Mikko: Well said !!  Kevin Rudd = “The Mouse that Roared”. What a great Peter Sellers movie. I will not be able to watch this movie again without thinking of the “Little Mouse” Rudd.

    • Bruce says:

      07:35pm | 07/01/10

      James Hunter: your correct, now we have another lot of OLD people running the country. Me thinks you need to get a better understanding of how well a country can be really run, just over 2 years ago we had a surplus, high employment, high personal wealth, healthy share market, and an expanding economy, a booming mining sector etc. Just ask your parents how well their superannuation is going compared to 2 years ago. Not so good I would suggest. Says it all !!

    • steveo says:

      08:04pm | 07/01/10

      Kelley says:
      And Howard had almost 12 years and did nothing. Squadered the opportunity to use billions on infrastructure, health & education to create a middle class welfare system.
      We all know that Coalition supporters think that Rudd is some sort of superman. What else could explain their expectation that he succeed with total reform in a two year period when the former Howard government failed to make any progressive reform in 12.?

    • Jane the elder says:

      01:18pm | 13/02/10

      Twaddle, absolute tripe.  It took 10 years to pay off the profligacy of the previous Government and try to make some sense of what had occurred in the adminstration in those years.  I was in Education Administration for the bulk of the 80’s and well into the 90’s.  The amount of Empire Building and waste that occurred in those years ensured my locks remained curly. It’s worth noting also that it was in those “clever Australia” years that the T was taken out of TAFE. Worth noting also that SA and the NT had been trying to get a rail line through the centre since before WW11.  When the ALP Government drew the Berrimah Line during WW11 all work stopped.  What sort of Infrastructure would you call the train line from Alice Springs to Darwin?  Useless in the face of a yet unrealized NBN, that will not transport food and goods?  Incidentally the $7 billion national internet connection proposed and organised by the Howard Government would have already been in place for 12 months now. How’s the NBN going - costed? analysed? organised? Yawn, not yet none of those three essentials are ALP attributes it would seem.  Internet Censorship seems to be trundling along OK, whether we want it or not hey?

    • Craigo says:

      08:13pm | 07/01/10

      KRudd is popular because of a limp wristed media that will not ask him one difficult question but keep him on the front pages with these fleeting sound bites. KRudd fronts up to popular TV shows and receives fawning adoration that is almost pornographic. Gillard was happy to answer foppish questions on the 7pm Project last night but refused to answer a hard one about whaling tonight. And still it goes on. What we need is an opposition who can oppose (even if it is at the last gasp like ETS) with a cogent argument and stick to the basics and focus back on Labour and their incompetence. Get you stuff together Nick. Get on message like Abbott did from his first day and keep pushing the same message highlighting Rudd’s flip flops and keep pushing.

    • Matt says:

      10:53pm | 07/01/10

      Cats, “I don’t vote either party, so I can say this all without hypocrisy”. Unfortunately for you, your vote probably did go to Labor, depending on the preference arrangements for your particular electorate. Of the 85 seat Labor hold only 43 were won on first preferences, so by voting for the Greens (and several other minor parties) you potentially contributed to instilling the worst Labor Government in Australia’s history. The machinations of our parliamentary system should be taught in school to help eliminate that sort of naivety.

    • Davy says:

      11:36pm | 07/01/10

      Perhaps he can only count up to one.

    • Tony S says:

      04:45am | 08/01/10

      Great piece Nick! Good to see it has stirred many comments. Too bad most ppl in this thread are ppl who would follow politics closely and therefore know what is going on (the persistent empty promises).

      The challenge is getting the message out to all those voters who don’t pay attention to politics until election time. Better come up with some darn good campain material!

      And thank you for getting rid of Turnbull you have done the liberal party a great service. Abbot is twice the leader Rudd could ever hope to be. Turnbull while smart on economic matters had no appeal to ordinary ppl and was a politcal novice.

      I can not wait for the next election I plan to spend a significant amount of time campaining against Rudd and Labor!! Let the battle begin!

    • Terry says:

      08:22am | 08/01/10

      I know this is a bit off the subject but why is our PM now writing childrens books??? WTF. Isn’t he employed to be running the country or am I asking too much of him, surely that is a bit of gold for the Liberal Party.

    • PJ says:

      12:17pm | 08/01/10

      Where are the true believers now? Do you intend to ride this carcess [PM] into the next election? Surely, you should think of Australia first. Assert what credibility you have left and rid yourselves of this TOXIC waste!

    • Kevin Rennie says:

      01:36pm | 08/01/10

      Clearly Kevin Rudd’s No.1 priority has been the economy and employment. He’s winning on this front while the Coalition is bereft of policies or proposed action.

    • Greg says:

      06:30pm | 08/01/10

      @ Kevin Rennie

      if indeed as you say the economy is his number one priority, then he certainly is as incompetent as many are starting to believe. The KRudd cheer squad like to ignore the fact that they were left with a 22 billion dollar surplus by the Howard Government which they promptly gave back to the tax payer. They then borrowed a further couple of hundred million and handed that out as well. And remember they didn’t have to bail out a single aussie bank, not one. The Howard government came to office and they made the economy the number one priority and payed off 96 billion dollars of labor debt and Australian’s standard of living was the highest it’s ever been. Remember, it was while KRudd and Swan were at the wheel that Aussie banks stopped sticking to the official cash rate and started gouging borrowers. Add that to the increasing costs of utilities across the nation (thanks to ETS), price gouging oil giants (are they going to fix this?) and greedy supermarket chains (are they going to fix this?), and we have a stack of economic issues confronting the nation and even more broken promises and KRudd and Swan have not given any indication of how this record government debt will be payed off.

      In summary to state the coalition has no economic policies is ignoring the fact that the current government has no policies (and yet it is a No.1 priority) on how to pay back the single greatest challenge facing the economy: DEBT.

      Kevin, if you want to look into the future of this Federal Labor Government, come to NSW. I would be happy to show you around sometime so you can see for yourself what a decade of Labor No.1 priorities has done for this state, and if you already live in NSW then pull your head out of the sand!

    • Leticia says:

      07:01pm | 08/01/10

      Kevin Rennie - Is that the best performing economy in the world which was inherited by the Rudd Government, thanks to Peter Costello and John Howard you are talking about? And is this the Labor Party that spent 11 years without any credible leader or any credible policies? Quite a record I would think.

    • Elmer Fudd says:

      10:02am | 09/01/10

      What can you really expect from a guy that only got elected because of his Kevin07 media marketing campaign.
      He knows how to fool (a majority of) the nation just as a certain leader in history fooled his nation into starting one of the biggest wars in history.

    • mick munchkin says:

      01:55pm | 09/01/10

      didnt the last government do nothing on climate change..
      do nothing on infrastructure..
      do nothing on bridging the inequality between aboriginals and the rest of the population…
      do nothing on making sure there are enough doctors and nurses…

      i wish they hadve done nothing on invading iraq to stop saddams human shredding machines… ohhh .. and the laughable fridge magnets..

      thanks for nothin minchin.. now go away, your mob is absolutely no better.

    • Jane the elder on a rainy day says:

      01:29pm | 13/02/10

      I’ve addressed part of the infrastructure furphy in another post (bear in mind that much of what you claim to be failings of the Howard government fall squarely at the feet of the State governments who squander billions on such things as WYD, New years Eve Fireworks and Breakfasts on the Bridge, sigh)  However, in terms of bridging the inequality between Aboriginals (note upper case A) my husband and I were heavily involved in Aboriginal Education in the NT through the 80’s and 90’s.  We watched practical programs such as Carpentry and Joinery, Basic Maths & English (correct, there were many, many people who could not speak English), Mechanical Courses etc, etc, on communities get pushed aside in favour of Business Studies, Computer Courses (for places with no running water and/or electricity)  etc. I’ve just touched the tip of the damage the ALP has done in those areas.  Just don’t try coming the raw prawn with me in terms of Aboriginal advancement and bridge building.

    • John A Neve says:

      03:56pm | 09/01/10

      Elmer Fudd @ 1102hrs,

      Suggests the bulk of the population are fools!!
      We all wish we were as smart as you Elmer. Have you ever thought of standing for parliament?  If you did, you’d get my vote.

    • Rob says:

      08:07am | 10/01/10

      Krudds’s #1 priority is KRudd. All the others are red herrings, intended to misdirect the Australian public. He’s a first class actor but a third class politician. Oh, sorry. The two careers are identical.

      All the world’s a stage, and Kevin thinks he can direct the action. Then along come Obama & Brown et al, hand him a mop and put him in his place.

      He’s been taking lessons from Peter Garrett. A crap politician and a reformed greenie who jumps on stage and croaks his little heart out in order to generate popularity.

      Both Rudd and Garrett (and two for a Penny Wong) should stop play acting and start doing what they are paid to do - govern Australia.

      I just hope the opposition get their act together and don’t start compromising beffore the next election. But then, they are politicians, too.

    • TC says:

      06:38pm | 11/01/10

      When you think about what KR has done we should all be very glad he’s gone missing.

      So far he’s been binge shopping and spent all the money, maxed out the credit card, screwed up the relationship with China, screwed up the relationship with Indonesia, embarrassed the nation in Copenhagen, and doing well at screwing the relationship with Japan.

    • Greg says:

      08:06pm | 11/01/10

      @ Mick Munchkin

      Oh Mick, Really, the climate would get hotter or colder no matter what Howard did. It’s called nature.

      Did nothing on infrastructure? well They did build the M7 in Sydney. Perhaps they could have done more. Like getting the wharfies to do their jobs. That was almost as good as infrastructure because once upon a labor government, these guys would wait until the ports were overflowing before unloading another ship.

      Did nothing on aboriginal rights? Well they did start the intervention which stopped aboriginals from sexually abusing their children and wait for it, the Rudd labor government liked it so much they kept it. Oh sorry Mick, It was all about the apology because KRudd and and his dopey cohort think that words speak louder than action.

      As for Iraq, again you’re right because the trusty UN’s oil for food embargo was so successful that there was no way Kofee Anan’s son would be indulging in anything dodgy and it wasn’t as if Saddam was still able to purchase weapons with the proceeds.

      In short the world wasn’t perfect when Howard was in charge, but the stuff that needed doing got done. Now we live in a socialist utopia were opinion polls are all that matters and they can be fixed easily by strong words and no action from the emperor himself.  Thankfully, soon the Emperor will be able to censor the internet so posts like mine can’t put an alternative view out there.

    • thatmosis says:

      07:02pm | 14/01/10

      The stalwarts of the Gunna Krudd camp make me laugh, protecting a man who has not lifted a finger to help the Australian people but burdend them with a deficit that will hang like a millstone around your childrens necks for decades to come. I never voted for this clown as I wasnt brain dead and saw through the tissue of lies that he called an election campaign whereas the sheeple followed like lambs to the slaughter and unfortunately took us along for the ride. Gunna Krudds one and only priority is Gunna Krudd nothing else, as he flits from overseas conference to overseas conference trying to make himself look bigger and better than everybody else but the people can see he is actually the King without his clothes.

    • Johnno says:

      04:08pm | 28/01/10

      Our PM, the escapee from South Park, has more spin than Shane Warne ever had.  He will say whatever he perceives as being popular at the time - he just loves to be loved - fortunately for him, he has the general media in his awe, so there is very little journalistic hard questioning.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter