If you’re sick of reading about Utegate – and a poll currently running on SkyNews suggests 45 per cent of you are – I’d suggest you skip this and go straight to the article below about orgasms.

Our health columnist Roy Eccleston reveals that far from sending you blind, frequent and enthusiastic self-abuse may be the key to longer life, which makes you wonder why David Carradine and Michael Hutchence aren’t still with us today. 

Death in the chamber: Turnbull faces another long day

Anyway, I digress. This column isn’t about sex, but it is about somebody who looks totally shagged - Malcolm Turnbull, who, currently, is the Leader of the Opposition.

The past 24 hours in Australian politics have shed stark new light on the character and style of the nation’s two political leaders.

And it’s Kevin Rudd who has emerged as the best practitioner of politics, while Turnbull’s vacillating, scatter-gun efforts have only fuelled the perception that he may not be mentally and tactically equipped for the job.

Going into what for Turnbull will be a hugely important and massively taxing second sitting day of Parliament, Kevin Rudd looks like a very effective politician, and Malcolm Turnbull looks like a lawyer.

Turnbull looks mentally exhausted. Rudd is full of beans.

Rudd was a picture of focus and discipline yesterday.

With his tedious monotone, he stuck to his mantra that the email which treasury official (and police suspect) Godwin Grech referred to in estimates on Friday was “a fake, a forgery, a fabrication” and that Mr Turnbull had no choice but to “walk into Parliament, apologise, and resign.”

It was staccato and methodical and toxically boring, and it did not waver from his first morning radio interview to his unusual 6.30pm stand-up outside Parliament’s great verandah with A Current Affair’s Peter Overton, who is currently being treated for hypothermia.

What it confirmed is that Rudd, who apart from a brief stint living in a Datsun 180B, has led a consistently uninteresting life as a diplomat, advisor and politician, and has the skill and temperament to craft a simple message and stick to it.

This isn’t a vindication of what he said. Rudd very deliberately has spent most of the past 24 hours talking almost exclusively about the fake email which purported to implicate him in the Utegate affair, rather than the series of genuine emails which suggested (and still suggest) that Treasurer Wayne Swan had gone the extra yard for their friend, Ipswich car dealer John Grant.

But Rudd wrung every drip of political life out of the hoax email which, even though it never formed the basis of Turnbull’s entire attack on the government, was nevertheless used by Turnbull to call for the PM’s dismissal. It’s here where Turnbull has been accused of “over-reaching”, the new favourite term of the nation’s political pundits.

I’m not sure if he over-reached. But he certainly flailed about like a ratbag.

After starting the morning strongly, Turnbull hit the wall around lunchtime yesterday as it was revealed that the AFP had raided Grech’s house and established the email was a fake. The emergence that the AFP also want to talk to one of his former staff completely rattled the Libs, who left the chamber in the middle of the Utegate debate.

Rather than acknowledging the Grech email was a fake – as Tony Abbott did last night on Lateline - Turnbull tried to pretend he hadn’t been gravely embarrassed when his body language suggested he wanted to hide under the dispatch box.

Worse, he acted like a lawyer, in that upon realising his arguments against Rudd had a gaping hole in them, he quickly hunted around for a new one and tried to make Swan the sole focus of his attack.

His performance goes to the sense that Turnbull is not so much a conviction politician but a sophist and a dilettante for whom politics is merely the latest string to his bow in a life which has ranged from merchant banking and journalism to republican campaigner to arts enthusiast.

Being a renaissance man might make you an interesting dinner party guest but it probably won’t make you prime minister; as things stand Rudd’s grip has tightened on that prize.

41 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Seanous of the NT says:

      08:56am | 23/06/09

      I wonder if the Treasure will avoid the questions that are due, because of the focus of this story in the media at large is between Malcom Turnbull and Kevin Rudd.

    • Tmd says:

      09:19am | 23/06/09

      I cannot believe that just about every journalist has bought this line from Kevin Rudd.  Why do they continually bow to this man and not stand him up.  Unbeleivable!

    • Max says:

      09:18am | 23/06/09

      Who concocted the email? When? And Why?

      These three questions must be answered fully and on the basis of proper independent inquiry before the Australian public can judge whether this is a cover up and ambush driven by DowntheSwannie/KRudd, or a plant by someone else.

    • DJE says:

      09:33am | 23/06/09

      As a Liberal supporter I have to say (as hard as it is) that Malcolm Turnbull has two options: either admit that he has been naive and has handled the whole situation so ineptly and embarrassingly that he is not qualified to be the alternative Prime Minister of this country; or, that he or his party had some degree of involvement in the development and/or promotion of what we now know to be a fake email and therefore should resign. Either way, Malcolm Turnbull’s days as leader of the Liberal Party are numbered.

    • JJ says:

      09:36am | 23/06/09

      Who will the coalition turn to next to lead the party? Maybe iron bar should be given a go :p

    • Hebs says:

      09:50am | 23/06/09

      Malcolm looks like a tool.  He should have known better than to demand the resignation of the PM based on no documentary evidence and the hazy memories of a public servant.  He needs to apologise at least to try to redeem himself.  I don’t know the Liberal Party can continue with him as leader if he doesn’t.  Hockey is waiting in the wings

    • Mark says:

      09:52am | 23/06/09

      How told Wayne Swan to look after Mr Grant, who told the Treasury public servant to type the email, send it to Grech and them immediately delete it - if the AFP were allowed to investigate the phone messages that would provide some useful truth - shifty Kev and Wayne are not out of the woods yet

    • Lucy says:

      09:59am | 23/06/09

      @DJE (and everyone else):

      Whenever a post begins with “as a Liberal supporter” - you know the person votes differently. It is a common starting point for a comment in order to give the reader a perception that the comments you are making are somehow difficult to make.

      It falls into the same category as “with all due respect” - when in fact you have none. Or even Tony Abbott yesterday in Parliament when he preceded most of his ‘points-of-order’ with “reluctantly Mr Speaker”. There was absolutely no reluctance at all - he rose to the Dispatch Box with lightning speed.

      DJE has presented Kevin Rudd’s position - which is manifestly flawed.

      First, there is no evidence whatsoever that Malcolm Turnbull had any role in creating or distributing the email. None. That is a completely unsubstantiated allegation made under Parliamentary Privilege by the Prime Minister yesterday.

      Second, while Malcolm Turnbull may have ‘over-reached’ in his attack on Rudd, he had good reason to. He had an email together with testimony from a senior public servant. It is worth remembering that the Government was apparently unable to even find the email. It took the AFP to locate it, and to make a determination that it was fake. Turnbull, Rudd, Swan, Steve Lewis from the Daily Telegraph, or anyone else for that matter, had neither the technology nor the ability to make such a determination. The contents of the email were backed up by sworn testimony.

      Were Turnbull not to act on this, he would have looked complicit. Interestingly, Piers Akerman reports today that he has spoken to Grech, who apparently maintains there was correspondence with the PM’s office. But, Turnbull is wise to let this one go.

      Third, the emails that are not in dispute, relate to the Treasurer and his role in providing ‘special help’ to John Grant. Now, Wayne Swan has released additional emails relating to other car dealers and has suggested there is no issue as many of them had more correspondence devoted to their case.

      Well, is anyone surprised by this? Of course there was more correspondence - they did not get the benefit of a phone call directly from the Treasurer, nor (as I understand) the ongoing monitoring of the Treasurer through his arrangement to have updates sent to his home fax.

      That’s the benefit of having such a level of influence - you can make one phone call, and don’t have to do anything else. You certainly don’t need to get into a long-winded email conversation with pesky public servants and staffers who want to ask lots of questions.

      Simple - ring the Treasurer. Treasurer advises staffer, staffer advises Dept and hey, presto - the senior public servant raises the matter “as promised” with the CEO for Ford Credit.

      Fourthly - the argument currently being promoted by Wayne Swan and Kevin Rudd - the no harm, no foul defence - is farcical and I am amazed no-one has gone on the attack yet.

      To suggest that because John Grant didn’t end up getting any help from Ford Credit, or the Government, somehow exonerates the Treasurer is utterly absurd. Grant’s lack of outcome is not for want of trying by the Treasurer. Thankfully, someone down the chain decided it was inappropriate.

      If, hypothetically, a person had paid a Minister a bribe of $100,000 and the Minister took the money, and the individual still got no outcome from the Minister attempting to exercise his/her influence, would the Minister no longer be guilty of an offence?

      Of course not. It is a completely preposterous notion.

      So, the attack on Swan will continue - as it should. Something in all of this mess stinks. I only hope the controversy over the ‘fake’ email doesn’t allow the ‘real’ evidence to be discredited, or worse, ignored.

    • Paul says:

      10:02am | 23/06/09

      First we have Defense rebelling against their minister and now we have treasury trying to set up the PM. It looks like Honest John has done a very good job of politicising the Public service.

    • Adam says:

      10:16am | 23/06/09

      Sorry Lucy - all your points may be valid (although they are most certainly not), but it doesn’t alter a very simple truth - the PM has managed to convince the public that his side of the story is the truth and that Turnbull’s is not. Turnbull is being perceived by 99% of the electorate as a fool, at best, and a sleazy liar, at worst. Unfair? Maybe, but so what? Perception is everything in politics and Turnbull has been fatally wounded. People will simply not be voting for him at the next election. That’s politics for you.

    • Jrld says:

      10:20am | 23/06/09

      *L*
      If the PM can live in a 180B too, than my life is completely emboldened!

      Turnbull can eat my aspirational arse perspiration if he is what being a social-climber is all about. Bring on the Datsuns, Utes and ‘isms- less boardrooms, great-crimes-and-trials and golden handshakes.

    • Aaron says:

      10:27am | 23/06/09

      @Adam: I think ‘unfair’ is the wrong word to describe the ute-gate backfire on MT. The man’s naked ambition to climb the heights of Australian politics was on full show. His personal ambition blinds him of any empathy necessary to do the social part of the job properly. It’s all about Malcolm with Malcolm. He’s a ruthless and conniving politician of the highest order, but not one worthy of serving public office. He’s better off doing his ass kissing, backstabbing. muck-raking, brown-nosing and selective fawning-over in the geeky puffed up windbag loving corporate world

    • Alex White says:

      10:38am | 23/06/09

      Good point about Turnbull. This whole affair shows that he doesn’t have the temperament or fortitude to be Prime Minister.

    • Steve says:

      11:01am | 23/06/09

      Malcolm Turnbull has always been one step removed from the general public, he unfortunately has an air of arrogance that repells most people. This foolish , childish attempt to expose curruption shows that as an opposition leader the libs and MT are embarrassingly poor.

    • John Humphreys says:

      11:04am | 23/06/09

      Newsflash: leader of opposition wants to be PM. Apparently, this makes him unfit to be PM.

    • Ben says:

      11:47am | 23/06/09

      @Lucy

      > First, there is no evidence whatsoever that Malcolm Turnbull had any role in creating or distributing the email.

      True - at present but I would think Turnbull would not be silly enough to get involved in this level of deceit. Jackie Kelly and her husband are gone so the mind boggles as to who was silly enough to do this.

      > Second, while Malcolm Turnbull may have ‘over-reached’ in his attack on Rudd, he had good reason to.

      But Turnbull is now denying he had the email, or he only saw part of it. Surely Turnbull as a former lawyer would appreciate the need to have the evidence verified and ready before launching such a heavy handed attack on the PM.

      > Were Turnbull not to act on this, he would have looked complicit. No he would have looked mature but waiting for the evidence to come fully to light.

      > Interestingly, Piers Akerman ...

      Why is Akerman speaking to someone in the middle of a police investigation?

      > Third, the emails that are not in dispute, relate to the Treasurer and his role in providing ‘special help’ to John Grant.

      While it is a separate issue in theory, the Opposition linked the Treasurer’s position to the fake email by lumping Rudd in with Swan as part of a cabal. Having made the connection, the Opposition now want to unravel it and go back to the start.

      > That’s the benefit of having such a level of influence ...

      The next bit contains a lot of speculation on your part as to what Swan did. The question is whether Swan misled parliament. The Opposition aren’t really suggesting Grant was given preferential treatment, the evidence indicates he wasn’t, but whether Swan misrepresented his involvement to parliament. Like the Opposition, you are trying to link separate issues to create a picture that doesn’t stand up.

      > Fourthly - the argument currently being promoted by Wayne Swan and Kevin Rudd - the no harm, no foul defence - is farcical and I am amazed no-one has gone on the attack yet.

      True but Turnbull made a major mistep by firing his big gun before the evidence was all lined up so it is no surprise it has blown up in his face and deflected attention away from the real issue of whether Swan misled parliament.

      > So, the attack on Swan will continue - as it should.

      Again, the Opposition linked Rudd, Swan and the email and now have to live with the consequences of part of that package being undermined.

      Tactically Turnbull has acted very precipitously and you have to suspect a more seasoned campaigner, such as Howard or Costello would not have made the same tactical error. Turnbull obviously has not been in parliament long enough to properly assess the ground rules which begs the question of why he is Leader of the Opposition so early in his career. The Opposition need a seasoned campaigner at the helm and I wonder if some are now beginning to kick themselves at Costello walking away when he did.

    • Wayne says:

      12:07pm | 23/06/09

      I did’nt vote for labor, I had a fealing my sons laptop computer that was promised to him would not work properly, and there would be no backup service, has anybody had the same problem with their laptop?

    • Drew says:

      12:13pm | 23/06/09

      @John Humphreys: Newsflash: Leader of opposition has no sense of political subtlety or public appeal. Apparently this makes him unfit to be PM.

    • G says:

      02:43pm | 23/06/09

      ” did’nt vote for labor, I had a feeling my sons laptop computer that was promised to him would not work properly, and there would be no backup service, has anybody had the same problem with their laptop?”

      No not really, but at least my spell check works! It’s under Tools > Options somewhere in MS Word if you need to turn it on!!!

    • Andrew says:

      03:04pm | 23/06/09

      Turnbull should never have been made Liberal leader. He forced his preselection on an unwilling seat. He is in a marginal seat. He is a latte sipping lefty rather than a true Liberal. He isn’t a team player and he has a vast amount of unsavoury baggage from his business career that can bite him at any time.

    • Pat says:

      03:20pm | 23/06/09

      Andrew, every time someone uses the term “latte sipping lefty”, they expose their own stupidity and discredit anything they might have been talking about.

      Smart man.

    • Pet says:

      03:31pm | 23/06/09

      The two most politically significant boys from Brisneyland get a good deal from the same local car dealer and the antennae stay folded?
      If you believe that one, give Anna Bligh of Queensland Asset Sales a bell, I think the Storey Bridge is on the market. Mates rates apply, of course.

    • David says:

      04:08pm | 23/06/09

      Malcom. What was he thinking? Was he thinking? No probably not.

      The blog simply divides between the two camps - my team vs your team but there is a larger question at stake here.

      MT has never been and will never be fit to lead this country. he shoots from the lip - is intemperate - and relies to heavily on his own intellectual resources without regard to his team.

      You need to be a team player and team leader and you can bore the toxicity out of banana bending cockroaches navel fluff but lead you can and do Mr Rudd.

    • realto says:

      05:19pm | 23/06/09

      There was a time around 1998 when it seemed that the next Labor PM was not in Parliament yet, and so it proved. That’s the case with the next Liberal PM. None of this sorry bunch will make it now that they’ve lost Capt Smirk, and even he looked to have no chance in an election should he show ticker enough to take the leadership.

    • jim says:

      06:41pm | 23/06/09

      Yes, I’m already so sick of “over-reach”. I can’t even think of a metaphorical context; in what sport do you over-reach? Basketball? I suppose a golfer might over-reach and pick the wrong club. Who invents these drab expressions, and why do I care?

    • Marilyn says:

      04:09am | 24/06/09

      Waht does it take for liberal huggers to understand that no-one got anything, OzCar does not exist.

      All that happened is that Grant lives near Swan.  It is Swan’s job to help people.

      I think the people with the most egg on their faces are the media.

      I watch Turnbull and I have no idea if he believes in anything, stands for anything other than Malcolm and I have no idea why he is in politics at all.

    • Cat says:

      10:16am | 11/07/09

      to Marilyn
      What does it take for the majority of labor-ists to understand that it’s not what Ozcar did or didn’t get, but the fact (there’s proof) that the treasurer showed an abnormal interest in Ozcar getting assistance.
      Unfortunately, as Adam says ‘the PM has convinced the country that his side of the story is true’.

    • Terry P says:

      11:51am | 11/07/09

      So true Cat, when Swan was asked what other car dealerships he had a PERSONAL PHONE CONVERSATION with he answered “your not asking the right question” and was very uncomfortable! He also wouldn’t answer it in question time, WHEN ASKED SEVERAL TIMES. Is this not proof he gave favourable attention to John Grant Motors?? And the media just dropped it like a smelly rag, not to be mentioned again??
      And if so he (like Turnbull acused him of) lied to Parliment by answering ” I gave no favourable treatment to John Grant Motors”. And if he did, I wonder who asked him to do this??? They seem to have got away with this by putting the focus on Turnbull. i’M INTERESTED IN KNOWING IF THE TREASURER OF AUSTRALIA AND THE PRIME MINISTER are lying here. I’m not worried about Turnbulls fake e-mail he was given. He’s not in power! Rudd and Swan are. How they ever conned Australia to believe them astounds me.Well I supose they got the media onside somehow and kept the focus up on Turnbull. I’m so suprised that more Australians weren’t interested in finding out the truth! Instead of chasing down Turnbull?

    • Larry says:

      03:08pm | 11/07/09

      YEP! the PM and Swan have lied to Parliment and have very cleverly/sneakerly avoided being caught out. They have had the media on their side through out this whole thing. I don’t think the media are very fond of Turnbull, so they have agreed with Government to concentrate on Turnbull. It’s very obvious Swan is hiding and doesn’t want one particular question asked of him again. How many other car dealerships did you have a personal phone conversation with? A very nervous looking Swans answer to this was “your not asking the right question” Funny enough, that question was never again asked by the media, and I never saw it replayed. The only other person to ask this question was Turnbull in Question Time several times! and he still got away with not answering it! And Swan has been laying low ever since, hoping it isn’t asked again…which now it probably won’t. The media would prefer to just keep attacking Turnbull over a fake bloody e-mail. I can’t understand how anyone believes Rudd and Swan about this.

    • Ian says:

      03:13pm | 11/07/09

      Ask Swan
      “how many other car dealerships he had a personal phone conversation with”
      His answer
      “your not asking the right question”
      How on earth did he get away with that!

    • Morris says:

      05:28pm | 11/07/09

      Interesting comments about that question…..I never saw the interview, but if that was Swans answer I’d like to see him asked again.

    • Karen says:

      01:03pm | 12/07/09

      I didn’t see any media coverage on that either.?

    • Ignatius says:

      03:21pm | 12/07/09

      How different the latest polls would have been if Swan was made answer that question It may not seem such an important question, but if he said there were others then he wouldn’t have a case to answer. The fact he won’t answer it shows John Grant Motors was the only one he spoke to personally, which means Turnbulls correct! Rudd and Swan have lied to parliment, They need to get Swan in an interview on TV and ask him again, so we can all see whose been lying all along!

    • Stephen says:

      09:12am | 13/07/09

      Rudd is a phoney, and his popularity is built on the back of a lie!

    • Wilson says:

      10:56am | 13/07/09

      That interview was with Kerry O’brien on 7.30 Report. Kerry O’brien almost fell off his chair when Swan refused to answer it as well.  It wasn’t picked up by any other media, and I thought it would have been played back during the news the following day but there was nothing? Never to be screened again. I bet Rudd had a very nervous moment when he saw it! I don’t think we have seen Swan give another interview since.

    • stephen says:

      01:09pm | 13/07/09

      ...And what lie is that Stephen ?

    • Jenny says:

      02:02pm | 13/07/09

      The answer is in Terry P’s comment.

    • stephen says:

      02:50pm | 13/07/09

      Maybe here you have to trust Kerry O’brien. If he thought there was a story in repeating that question, I think he would have done so.
      Wayne Swan’s answer…“You’re not asking the right question”, may simply be impatience at being treated as under cross-examination.

    • Darren says:

      03:37pm | 13/07/09

      Sounds like Swan was hiding something to me and was caught out on that question. Kerry O’brien did ask him again and Swan waffled on and on again about Turnbull and the fake e-mail.

    • Elaine says:

      12:20pm | 19/07/09

      When are the AFP suposed to get back to us on their investigation? I have a feeling if it doesn’t come up smelling like roses for the Government we won’t hear anything.
      The same as we never heard any more about the refugee boat that burnt. Why don’t the media go after Rudd a bit more and chase up these questions? All the Turnbull bashing is becoming boring!
      Put Mr Popular in the hot seat for a change!

    • daifxuha says:

      10:23am | 10/09/11

      <a > tramadol hcl acetaminophen par effects Mariano </a>
      <a > online order Acyclovir Alternate </a>
      <a > Diflucan pharmacies accepting cod delivery filmed </a>
      <a > cheap discount online Prednisone electric </a>
      <a > next day Trazodone delivery Template </a>
      <a > Doxycycline cod shipping disagree </a>
      <a > generic cialis soft tabs Drape </a>
      <a > viagra industry </a>
      <a > buy xanax without rx QUESTIONS </a>
      <a > cheap soma cod PRAYER </a>
      <a > tramadol cheap next day Ankley </a>

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter