It was the week in which the words “Macquarie Banker” finally became rhyming slang after a member of the millionaire’s factory was caught perving on jpegs of Miranda Kerr during a live cross about interest rates.

Mick Atkinson (right) meets his Mr Snuffleupagus, Aaron Fornarino.

The week in which the words “cyberbully” and “tweet” were listed for inclusion in a Macquarie of a different kind.

It was also the week in which one of the most old-fashioned politicians in Australia, a man who seemed puzzled enough by the 20th century and is really struggling with the 21st, blundered into a raging cyber-storm which had the potential to blow away a government seeking re-election in just seven weeks’ time.

Technology has the potential to trouble us all but nobody has been as confused of late as poor old Mick Atkinson.

The South Australian Attorney-General, who is famous for riding a rusty treadlie around his inner-western Adelaide electorate, is a noted ascetic and social conservative.
Atkinson thinks the Catholic Church became a bit too poppy when it stopped conducting mass in Latin; he has campaigned for the right of parents to use corporal punishment on their kids, he once rang when I’d written a profile about the last living president of the Australian Communist Party, who was pretty much on his deathbed in Port Adelaide, and thundered that I’d penned an intellectually lazy paean to a Soviet apologist who had Stalin’s blood on his hands.

He’s an expert on the Coptic Popes of Alexandria. He’s fabled for having never missed a single ethnic community event in his culturally diverse electorate. He wears knitted vests.

He’s comfortable with his eccentricities, and while he often drives his colleagues (and the entire judiciary) nuts, he’s one of those public figures who makes life more interesting for the rest of us.

Atkinson made life a little bit too interesting for Mike Rann this week. Despite starting his career as a journalist, which you’d think would give him some enduring sense of the value of unfettered debate, the Attorney-General decided it would be a good idea to shut down that fandangled internet contraption in time for the state election.

Not quite shut it down, but amend the Electoral Act so that anyone commenting online on any political report must provide their real name and postcode, with a $5000 for failure to comply.

Sounding like a cross between Travis Bickle and a Salem preacher man, Atkinson declared that the digital arm of The Adelaide Advertiser, www.adelaidenow.com.au, was “not just an open sewer of criminal defamation but a sewer of identity theft and fraud”.

For an exciting 12 hours, during which the website almost collapsed under the weight of furious reader comments, the Rann Government looked like it was going to tough it out.
Political sanity prevailed and Rann announced - on Twitter, groovily enough - that the amendment would be repealed and that no-one would be prosecuted for failure to comply during the campaign.

Now this might sound odd, but Atkinson was actually dead right about the standard of much web commentary. The tone and quality of many comments is abysmal, and it’s a problem which stems in large part from anonymity.

Indeed, the reaction from many readers on the AdelaideNow site confirmed his criticism, with halfwits going by zany handles such as AtkinsonSux making the usual rank and ahistorical comparisons to Nazi Germany (Hitler being a real hardliner on the internet question, successfully preventing anyone in 1930s Germany from using it at all.)
It’s not a phenomenon limited to populist websites such as AdelaideNow either. The Washington Post, venerated liberal organ that it is, allowed reader comments some years ago but launched with a matronly warning that it would not tolerate profanity, hate-speech and name-calling, and were forced to shut it down within days and re-group as it descended into a moshpit of abuse.

The sanctimonious people at Crikey, who make a modest living chastising the mainstream press, published a memorable comment from someone called Johnno2066 after the death of columnist Frank Devine last year teasing his daughter, journalist Miranda Devine, about the fact that her father had “snuffed it”. (It would have given the great man joy to know that even in death he is still giving lefties the shits.)

We have tried on The Punch to plead with readers to use their real names, often emailing them back ourselves asking them to give a name; most don’t, and would not comment at all if we insisted. Only last Saturday we busted one weirdo who had spent the weekend - probably in Mum’s spare room - sending emails under 14 different names refuting climate change. 

But the issue wasn’t that the Rann Government had suddenly decided to take action to improve online debate. The Rann Government decided to take action to stop people criticising the Rann Government.  And it was an absolute disgrace.

It was rightly attacked as such, and in great number, by many sensible readers of the AdelaideNow website, many of whom were first-time commenters who knew government impertinence and abuse when they saw it.

The other issue which the Government had to deal with, but which Mike Rann had the good sense to defuse, was one of hypocrisy.

If Atkinson is fixed firmly on the luddite axis of the technology spectrum, Mike Rann is very much the early adopter. More than any other Australian politician, Rann has championed and employed social media such as Twitter as a way of communicating directly to the public, spruiking great SA events such as the Tour Down Under, taking potshots at his opponents and so forth.

It’s a dynamic and interesting way of engaging with people and anything which brings politicians and the people who pay their wage into closer contact is a good thing.

But you can’t swan boldly into the social media world, knowing what a jungle it can be, and then jack up when an empowered punter, anonymous or otherwise, decides to tweet back that you’re a fraud and a phoney, possibly even a conman or a crook. If it’s good enough to receive a plaudit for bringing Lance Armstrong to SA, you have to cop rugged abuse from those who think you’ve wasted money by doing so and are using him as an election stunt.

It was Atkinson who placed the Premier in this position by pushing this crazy law, with the backing of an unwitting Opposition, as part of a suite of amendments late last year.

And it was Atkinson who took the rap for the shambles, even to the point of meeting publicly for a humiliating coffee with a Mr Aaron Fornarino, to whom he apologised for citing him as an example of the silly, made-up names people use online.

Just like the bloke at Macquarie Bank, who’s become a global superstar purely by dint of opening a couple of attachments a bodgy mate emailed him for a laugh, Mick is probably at home in his vest oiling the Malvern Star and yearning for simpler times. Those times are as gone as his silly electoral amendment, but hopefully his point about civility is something that will endure.

Most commented

29 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Zeta says:

      06:59am | 06/02/10

      Sup Penbo, you know Atkinson is being challenged in his electorate by these guys: http://www.gamers4croydon.org/

      They’re Australia’s first Video Game focused minor party. They’re campaigning on the R18+ classification rating, which in the realm of single issue politics is probably less ridiculous than the numerous ‘Bring Back The Statutory Offences Act’ parties.

      Who knows, his comment censorship gaffe might net them a few votes. They were smart enough to run in other electorates, and nominate for the Upper House. I reckon they’re in with a small chance. Think about it: the Shooters Party nets 2 seats in NSW off the back of a voter base of 500,000 firearms licences and just over 5 per cent of the Upper House primary vote, so not everyone with a gun is giving first preference to the Shooters. I think there would be a lot more people who own an XBox then own a gun in Australia.

      Having said that, Atkinson is no luddite. Check out http://www.kotaku.com.au/2009/11/a-letter-from-michael-atkinson/ on the R18+ classification issue. Not only that, he actually jumps onto the Kotaku comments every now and then and responds directly to angry video game fans who bay for his blood.

      As for the anonymity of comments, I don’t believe people should be in the habit of giving out their personal information to strangers online. Alot of people wouldn’t express their real opinions if they had to give their names either. I know I wouldn’t. In real life, I’m actually Belinda Neal.

    • Martin says:

      07:00am | 06/02/10

      Wait, Miranda Devine is a journalist?  No wonder the profession is held in such low regard.

    • Paul says:

      07:35am | 06/02/10

      Penbo, Rann didn’t come out immediately shut this down, Rann gave the issue a short space of ‘air’. Rann has shown his colours as anti civil rights and anti freedom of speech. And Rann is also a Luddite because he believes that the internet can be ‘filtered’ with Conroys wonky-technology. If there hadn’t have been a significant backlash, Rann would have run with the idea because it was deeply in his political self interest to do so. Penbo, sometime you and Rann need to go to a pub (particularly if there is a debating night - if any of them still exist) and discuss politics and see the bizarre theatre of name calling and frothing and uncivility and un- political correctness. (I doubt factional disputes in Labor/Libs are any more civil than ape wrestling either) That is the reality of the Australian political ‘conversation’ Penbo - don’t get uppity on us. Always has been, always will be, no matter what News Limited would prefer. Rann and his control freak buddies can’t change that. Keep it real mate.

    • T.Chong says:

      08:15am | 06/02/10

      An absolutley appalling attempt by the SA AG, which was initially supported by the SA Libs, WTF was he thinking?
      While no one supports outright deliberate lies, or party political spruikers, caution may be warranted if using real names.
      Tthat could stymie a lot of discussion, particularly if for whatever reason, a bloggers views may be unacceptable to family, friends, occupations etc.
      (in my own case, so many of my fellow Luddite commune dwellers would consider my postings too Right Wing, and I could lose my position as secretary chairperson of the collective, then I would have to find a real job
      with no time to weave baskets or sip latte or hate the Oz flag).

    • Davy says:

      01:58pm | 06/02/10

      Surely your luddite community does not hate the Oz flag if it has been woven on a hand loom.
      Now tell me. Is it true you make your latte’s by blowing into hot milk with a straw.

    • Steve Parker says:

      09:10am | 06/02/10

      Take away the right to say “f**k” and you take away the right to say “f**k the government.”  ~Lenny Bruce

      You have to look carefully at Mr Atkinson for behind his attempts at manipulation of public comment lie spin, control and power. This latest incident is one in a list of serial community atrocities that shouldn’t have happened. Be reminded in particular of the dodgy manouvers in the St Clair development, orders on people meeting etc. Don’t be fooled by the cosy daft old eccentric image - wearing his braces and riding his bike around - most in South Australia believe that Atkinson’s lack of consultation and removal of civil liberties mirror a Labor Government that has been in power in this State for too long - and with this has come a complete disregard of the community it should be serving. Time for the carpet slippers to match the rest of the costume Michael.

    • Davy says:

      09:33am | 06/02/10

      I do notice that many bloggers appear to forget basic manners as they feel they are untouchable.
      Still, the up side is that lively unhindered debate, is then able to occur. People are far more likely to say what they really think if they believe they are anonymous.
      Of course now mr snuffleupagas is going to have to change his name being as you have expossed his alias. Bit like taking photos of some poor bastard in the shower and publishing it on the web.
      Does this make you like the paparazzi ?

    • Bill says:

      10:08am | 06/02/10

      I don’t see why personal abuse, can’t be edited like they do profanity.  What does it prove?  That your argument is stronger because you throw the word moron into the conversation?  The Punch could set a standard, but willingly chooses not to to do so.  No point having a posting policy really.

    • Miss Petal says:

      07:04pm | 06/02/10

      I said BILL, BILL, BILL,  I said love, I said pet , L said love, those young ones, I don’t know They don’t have clue about the correct and polite way of putting pen to paper.  Little so and so’s I say.  I put the kettle on and make a cuppa…...but on the flip-side the young one do give us a chuckle or two…little buggers xxxx from Miss Petal

    • Pete says:

      11:15am | 06/02/10

      Penbo, how does The Punch plan to conform with the Tasmanian Electoral Act once writs are called? I mean, I get your joy over SA saying they’ll repeal but doesn’t seem that Tassie will repeal theirs. Been there since 2004 and no one’s complained…

    • formersnag says:

      11:17am | 06/02/10

      Bloggers on the net have, in fact, not, been going far enough. We do so because we are enjoying the opportunity to do some of our own journalism. Which has been desperately needed in Australia for decades, because the standard of journalism here, has been atrocious. The lowest form of life anywhere is the “Canberra Press Gallery”. I for one am tired of them telling me, that all politicians, on both sides are NOT, a bunch of lying, cheating, thieving, corrupt, criminal, scum, because clearly, THEY ARE!

      There would be less than 6 honest politicians in Australia, SA independent Senator Nick Xenophon, QLD independent rep Bob Katter, VIC “Family First” Senator Steve Fielding, QLD “Nationals” Senator Barnaby Joyce (who hasn’t been corrupted yet) & that’s about it.

      If you were doing your job properly, Penbo, attacking, all politicians, bureaucrats & other journalists as vociferously as you should, then we, would not have to do it for you.

    • Steve Smith says:

      12:32pm | 06/02/10

      Every medium allows opinions a great deal of anonymity, the Internet gets more attention because of the quantity of opinions that can be posted. It’s only when we have politicians who do not understand new mediums that you find silly laws in place like those we have seen from SA. Why not have a classification for R18+ games? Why not allow people anonymous comments on the Internet?

      Do we not trust store clerks/parents/moderators to do their jobs? This is obviously the first step towards Communism.. or maybe just an angry old man who can’t finish Grand Theft Auto.

    • Andrew says:

      02:09pm | 06/02/10

      I can’t see any difference between phoney bloggers, phoney talkback callers and phoney letters writers in the print media. Liars and cowards will use any means at their disposal, because that’s their nature. In times gone by they were referred to as “snakes in the grass”.

    • lazerzap says:

      03:37pm | 06/02/10

      The Major political parties WANT to filter the net. Libs started the process before 1999. Dont expect any help from the major political parties at stopping internet filtering. It will take much social unrest before the issue is resolved. The religious brigade are mostly in control in canberra and they want it filtered. Always vote independent and avoid corrupt political control of the system.

    • loz says:

      03:58pm | 06/02/10

      This was a victory for citizen journalism. To make such an impression on an MP with their articles of text, even to the point of appearing as a marksman for the opposition would have some journalists envious. The assumption was wrong and warranted an apology. While Mr Atkinson was not wrong about some comment pages being sewers, common sense prevailed.  As for Aaron Fornarino he is now recognised as being a credible person that gets results. As for anonymous names, that is not the issue, but the content of the wording definitely is.

    • Don Clark says:

      03:58pm | 06/02/10

      However hamfisted it may have been, it was emphatically not censorship. Wildest of overstatements.

      And however eccentric or ill-advised, I’d give the Attorney General and the Premier credit for some courage and sense in making an eqally swift change of heart.

      All that said, there is considerable merit in wishing to address the cesspit of spite, insult and slander that is the blogosphere. And the lacklustre moderation standards of The Punch are a case in point.

    • Paul says:

      06:03pm | 06/02/10

      @don clark like Howards sedition laws weren’t censorship? Encouraging people to self censor through fear or not being able due to social status or work rules? Sure it wasn’t text book censorship but by no means was it pro freedom of speech. Was it taking democracy forward or backwards and I would contend, that added to Conroys censorship plan many Australians would assume Rann had some censorship intent. Especially as Rann is a senior figure in national Labor. Rann was only thinking of himself at the time. Same difference: Rann has an agenda of control and stifling dissent. And a bucket load of insecurity. Seen that winning formula in history before?

    • A BEE UNDER MY BONNET. says:

      01:59pm | 07/02/10

      Hear Hear Paul,
      The winning formula of history is indeed very simple.  A Polly may have been very much loath by the public and then loved and wanted the next. And then toss out like a ripped pair of panty-hose That is how it is. 

      May we all take It as a very easily formula to work out.  Based on history as the facts go it does indeed heavily pend on a matter of - ‘the whom’ and ‘the what side’ the bread it butter the mos t-  as to the winning formula that has been heard, seen and documented as the truth.. Like it or loath it, it is what it is..

      Human Nature at it best…that is to say ‘some folk’,..... The Power, The under dog, Ownership, having control of the controls.  You get the picture don’t you.  It’s history,  Thank-you.

    • fluffy says:

      10:29am | 07/02/10

      and yet, despite the anonymous comments and justifiable bilious outrage, or perhaps because of them, common sense prevailed.

      im amazed at some of the comments of mine that you publish… you should be ashamed!

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      11:33am | 07/02/10

      Hang on a minute, aren’t you the same Penberthy who took the p*ss out of Joe Hockey for using Twitter, yet now, “....Mike Rann is very much the early adopter. More than any other Australian politician, Rann has championed and employed social media such as Twitter as a way of communicating directly to the public.”

      Can you explain why it’s a Good Thing for a Labour pollie to use Twitter but a Bad Thing if a Lib does it?

    • V says:

      05:33pm | 07/02/10

      Why does the punch plead users use their real name? Surely it is the substance and ideas contained in the comments that matter?

    • Paul says:

      08:04pm | 07/02/10

      As they say at a certain media outfit, Rann likes to stir the possums but doesn’t like his possum stirred.  tt

    • sneakers says:

      08:50am | 08/02/10

      “with the backing of an unwitting Opposition”

      Wait .. what? Unwitting?

    • Mark B says:

      11:34am | 08/02/10

      Good article David, however there are a couple of things I think you failed to mention.

      1. “that the amendment would be repealed and that no-one would be prosecuted for failure to comply during the campaign.”
      You forgot to add the part about it being repealed AFTER the election…not before. This was plastered across all online media outlets including The Punch. So does that mean if he’s not elected, then the law stays, which frankly amounts to blackmail.

      2. “with the backing of an unwitting Opposition”. You’re joking right. There was no opposition to this from either party, which frankly paints a very dark picture for the people of South Australia.

      While Mr Atkinson might have is foibles, he needs to understand that as the AG for South Australia, he not only has a responsibility to the people of that state, but a responsibility to the people of Australia.

      On this issue, and the issue of games ratings, he is failing miserably.

    • monkeytypist says:

      02:36pm | 08/02/10

      Penbo, your otherwise reasoned piece went off the rails a bit when it tried to pretend that saying “snuffed it” after someone dies is some sort of gross insult on par with associating people with genocidal maniacs.  You are letting your disdain for Crikey colour your judgement.  Yes, they’re sanctimonious, but so is every major media outlet.  Some people just hate them because they’re sanctimonious and small.  I hope you don’t; it would make the Punch seem that much less of a worthwhile place to people like me.

    • Matthew Stewart says:

      02:36pm | 08/02/10

      The Punch - What a bastion of integrity!  You want people to put their names on their posts, but you don’t force them to do so because most people would no longer post.  You prefer lively anonymous debate to no debate at all, because you know that a lot of people come here to read and post comments, and you would hate your revenue to decline in line with readership.  You put your profit before principals, but you still feel disposed to criticise and belittle (“one weirdo who had spent the weekend - probably in Mum’s spare room”) someone who posts under 14 names.

      Most of us have the brains to consider the value of a comment in the context of the source of that comment.  If it is poorly structured, poorly spelt and posted anonymously online, we might have a giggle at it, but it will hardly change our vote at the next election.  For those of us that are not capable of that level of judgement, we probably aren’t too well informed on politics anyway and new censorship laws are going to change that fact.

      South Australia’s ban on anonymous political commentary was just stupid and everyone knows it was stupid.  Your bizarre spin on such a clear cut issue is fascinating Penbo, but it might it might as well be anonymous given it’s level of meaningful content.

    • spindoctorsRus says:

      11:06pm | 16/02/10

      Hey, if the Government can use the press to spin and spin wildly, then surely the readers/bloggers can use whatever paltry means at their disposal to do the same.

    • 6clegs says:

      12:53am | 27/02/10

      Oh, Mr Atkinson - the bloke whose set up (after much delaying - & only just as an election is due) the incredibly retrumatising Victims of Crimes Ex-gracia ‘‘payment’’  for former state wards who were abused while in the care of the state government…

      but only those that gave evidence to the Mullighan Enquiry, and were “allegedly” sexually abused can go through the most un-friendly Redress schemes in the country. Too bad if your abuse was just physical or mental , coz you, apparently, don’t matter, or are considered worthy of Redress. *

      But joe public in SA can sleep at night assured that their state govt is a caring one (ugh) because of the sleazy spin, & manner how the AG dept released the news…. trouble is, 1 in every 4 people know a Forgotten Australian. One would think that politicians would understand those numbers at election time…

      So it doesn’t surprise me one bit that banning election comment by anon posters is another of his brainwaves. (some ought to tell him that Tassie has had this same stupid & unworkable law for ages - or is that where he got the idea?)

      * disclaimer: I am in fact eligible, and may be applying. I also *do not* live in South Australia - so will not be supplying my name, or address!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter