I think that we in the ALP are better than our opponents in celebrating our history and honouring our own.

Portrait of Bob Hawke by photographer Adam Knott for The Weekend Australian Magazine last year.

Whereas Malcolm Fraser is reviled by modern Liberals and the Democrats cannibalise their leadership, we revere our former Prime Ministers.

Past differences, old feuds and factional rivalries are forgotten as we celebrate success, and forget failures. I’ve seen, for instance, left-wing delegates cheer and give standing ovations to Paul Keating, their former nemesis. For us, Labor’s history is part of our present, and our future.

It’s the platform upon which we stand, giving a sense of purpose and continuum for the Party members who do the hard yards on polling booths, handing our how-to-vote cards.

At our last National Conference we conferred the ALP’s highest honour – honourary life membership – on Gough Whitlam.

Now in his 93rd year, Gough has become the kindly Olympian deity young Laborites would most love to befriend.

Gough and, at the State level, Don Dunstan were champions of change, maestros of the possible; leaders who incessantly summoned their Party and the Australian people to move forward.

They wanted to win because they were driven to do, and were not content just to be.

Together, Gough and Don were the Washington and Jefferson of Labor’s reform and renewal.

The ending of the White Australia Policy, conscription and our involvement in the Vietnam War.

The beginning of universal health insurance, Aboriginal land rights, the recognition of China, free university education.

A reinvigoration of national pride, and a broadening of our cultural horizons.

Tomorrow, at the ALP National Conference, life membership will be bestowed on Bob Hawke.

He was Labor’s most successful Prime Minister, winning four consecutive elections.

Instead of crash through or crash, Bob Hawke was Australia’s greatest architect of consensus.

He was also the best communicator, delegator and chooser of talent.

Bob’s period as Prime Minister from 1983 to 1991 fused a commitment to financial responsibility, economic growth and reform together with major social and environmental initiatives.

Until Hawke, these causes were seen to be mutually exclusive.

Hawke’s actions honoured his creed that “economic reform was not the enemy of social progress, but the necessary condition for it”.

From day one of his Prime Ministership, he vigorously attacked the blight of unemployment to the extent that - by 1990 - his Government had created 1.6 million extra jobs.

Indeed, Australia’s employment growth in the 1980s was more than double the OECD average for that period.

Firmly establishing the concept of the “social wage” through the Accord, the Hawke Government instigated new child-care programs.

It embraced multiculturalism and equality of opportunity.

It provided home care for older and disabled people, and boosted funding for public housing and disadvantaged students.

It increased income support for hundreds of thousands of low-income families.

It oversaw the widespread introduction of compulsory superannuation.

Best of all, it established Medicare, which remains one of the great and enduring monuments of his time in office.

Bob’s efforts in the area of school retention were also exceptional.

When his Government came to office, Australia had one of the worst rates of retention in the developed world, with only one-third of students completing Year 12. 

By the early 1990s, that figure had risen to 75 per cent.

Bob was no less active on the international stage. 

Under his stewardship, for example, we saw Australia, lead Commonwealth efforts to stare down apartheid, and help set up a South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone.

Our nation led the influential Cairns Group of nations in global trade talks, and secured a settlement in Cambodia.

It fought against mining in the Antarctic, and embarked on what Bob called Australia’s “enmeshment” with Asia, including the establishment of APEC.

For Labor, these great initiatives and successes made us feel proud to be Australians, especially when we travelled overseas.

It is for all these achievements, and for many, many others, that ordinary Australians still gather round Bob excitedly in the street and call out “Good on you Hawkey”.

He was the great uniter, and is still doing it through the Hawke Centre in Adelaide and, most recently, through the Centre for Muslim and Non-Muslim Understanding at the University of South Australia.

He was the great embracer of all the multiple varieties of the Australian spirit.

And for decades, Bob Hawke has been that spirit’s most eloquent voice.

Follow Mike on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/PremierMikeRann

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Andy says:

      07:53am | 31/07/09

      Truley Bob Hawke was a great man. Its true though what you say, its almost as if the Libs are ashamed of having Fraser.

    • DWest says:

      08:34am | 31/07/09

      I like & respect some of these Labor characters and their human hearts &pithy; mouths. I have no time or respect for the hardness & authoritarian nature of the 21C Labor middle class ‘brand’. Modern Labor is politically inbred, complacent, media obsessed & in the pockets of big business like never before. I seriously wonder sometimes, whose interests you and Rudd are representing? Not mine. No more Labor for me.

    • watty says:

      09:15am | 31/07/09

      Rann the romantic inadvertently highlighted the difference between Labor and the Coalition .

      The Coalition doesn’t “worship” all their past Leaders just because they were Leaders,with people like Fraser and Hewson springing to mind.

      Always wondered why ,if Hawke was so successful ,Keating challenged him twice in order to ditch Hawke as Leader and if Keating was so successful why did the voters chose “little Johnnie”?

    • iansand says:

      10:15am | 31/07/09

      As Vespasian said in the Party Room, as the last vote was counted:  “Alas.  I think I am becoming a god.” (Except Gough, who already knew he was).

      Somewhere, deep in ALP headquarters, a lonely candle burns before a shrine as vestal virgins dance….

    • Eric says:

      10:23am | 31/07/09

      Is the ALP a religion?

      The Party even built a $7 million shrine around a dead tree in Queensland.

    • Braidy Kean says:

      11:04am | 31/07/09

      Hmm Mr Rann, have you heard of a man named Robert Menzies? this man is a god to the Liberal Party, and people have more respect for that nation builder then any labor stooge

    • Dave Munro says:

      11:12am | 31/07/09

      You can not seriously say that people like you and Kevin Rudd are true ALP people. I grew up in the Port, Mick Young territory. I was a union rep, even becoming a Federal Councillor for the CPSU. Little old me was approached for an endorsement for Adrian O’Connell for his position while I was holding the federal position. The use of multiple spin doctors, the arrogance of so called servants of the public, the hiding behind parliamentary privilege to attack people with lies, bullying tactics. I could see no difference between Liberal and Labor. You have driven people like me to look for an alternative. This has gotten to the point that I have become a financial member of the F.R.E.E. Australia Party. Yes, the bikie party, but I am not a bikie, don’t even own one nor do I have a criminal record, just a family and a small business. Congratulations, your arrogance has created a new political party that is providing a real alternative. Check out the policies, you may be surprised that the repeal of the SOCCA laws is only a part of the parties platform. This countries treatment of the River Murray is equally as important.

    • ShaneO says:

      11:32am | 31/07/09

      Its not about history and lessons learnt its about creating myth and the cult of personality.

      This is another example of the modern ALP spinning everything into a positive and ignoring the whole picture.

      You only glorify the past when the future starts to dry up.

    • Jezza of Point Cook says:

      11:44am | 31/07/09

      Funny that Labor’s second most successful and long-serving PM after Hawkey, Andrew Fisher (who was PM for longer than Paul Keating, and certainly longer and more successful than Whitlam), doesn’t rate a mention in an article supposedly about how Labor “revere our former Prime Ministers.”

      Fisher was the first Labour PM to lead a majority government, and made significant contributions in building up the Navy, initiating welfare reforms, and establishing the Commonwealth Bank.

      Fisher’s absence from this piece is a glaring omission, I’d say, which shows up this piece as being more about spin than substance.

    • Lucy says:

      12:03pm | 31/07/09

      While Premier Rann does state ‘Prime Ministers’ the lack of reference to ‘former leaders’ is a glaring omission.

      Remember Mark Latham? He is so reviled Anthony Albanese used his name to criticise Malcolm Turnbull. In the corridors of Parliament House, Labor members no longer refer to Latham by name. It’s “Koresh” - after David Koresh, leader of the WACO cult.

      And what about Simon Crean? He was challenged for his seat last time around and looks like being challenged again.

      And of course there is so much respect for former NSW Premier Morris Iemma - and current Premier Nathan Rees. Kevin Rudd avoids being in the same room as Rees.

      More honesty, less spin thanks Mike. No party is perfect, so don’t pretend to be. And don’t get me started on the failings of those leaders Rann did name!

      The same could be said of many Liberal leaders past and present too, so no-one from that side of politics should be rushing to comment!

    • ed b says:

      12:14pm | 31/07/09

      Braidy, was that the same Bob Menzies who sold a heap of pig iron to the Japanese so they could use it to bomb Darwin? and the same bloke who proudly stated that Australia rides on the sheep’s back totally ignoring the necessity for the development of secondary and tertiary industries in this country and putting us decdes behind Asian and European nations in the industrial sector? The same bloke who in the early ‘60’s when the conservatives were on the nose said “I can buy all the votes we need to win with 10 bob” and did? What sort of nation builder was he really?

    • Derek says:

      12:47pm | 31/07/09

      Interestingly how parochial the comments are about the piece Mike Rann had published here ! No wonder South Australia is symbolised as The Crows, the bird that flies backwards in a strong wind, to, say some, keep the sand out of its eyes.

      So for goodness sake open your collective eyes and look at the big picture. A world where far too many fight day in day out to survive and struggle to have a good feed each day.

      Remember, or try, living in a non union country, a country without some semblance of social justice. There are plenty to choose from. I’d warrant a rapid return to good old Oz and benefit from the strikes and spilt blood of the past, which ultimately fashioned the conditions you all take for granted now.

      There is much work remaining, fashioning a socially justice society, which you could join in, to move on to a better world and an example to other Nations to follow.

      I recommend a good dose and understanding of egalitarian behaviour and altruism in practice, then join a political party and practice it.

    • Dave Wilson says:

      12:55pm | 31/07/09

      Mike lets apply some evidence based analysis to your spin:

      1. More children now are in poverty than in Hawkes era and you fully intend to put more children in poverty with your policies.

      2. Dido homeless numbers

      2. Labor governments today are less transparent and more secretive than ever before: hiding behind obstructive FOI laws, secret police searches, internet censorship etc etc . NSW and Qld are as dysfunctional and corrupt as they ever were.

      3. Has Labor moved forward on Aboriginal issues when in the N.T. black males are jailed at a rate almost five times greater than that practiced by South Africa during the Apartheid era?

      4. And then to taunt jobless people with 50,000 pretend jobs. What sort of bogan Labor policy is that?

      I hope Mike the Labor greats are writhing in their museum, or is it a temple Mike? The evidence would suggest you are dishonoring these peoples legacy.

    • fehowarth says:

      01:10pm | 31/07/09

      Same with how Mr. Fraser is treated is treated by his own side.  He is a much nicer man today than when he was PM

    • John says:

      03:12pm | 31/07/09

      If the Labor partly really had reverence for Bob Hawke then surely they would refer to his (very successful) government as the “Hawke Government” and not the “Hawke Keating” Government.  Why is Bob Hawke the only Prime Minister never have his period in government named after him?

    • simon says:

      05:05pm | 31/07/09

      Come back Mark Latham. Apparently all is forgiven and you will be venerated by the Labor party.
      Or is Latham an exception? Pfffhhhtttt…. most stupid, insipid, self serving, article by a Labor hack yet.

    • Rob says:

      05:37pm | 31/07/09

      Mike Rann’s reverence for Bob Hawke is a reminder of the acute irony of the ALP - a party which lambasts class and hierarchy yet which is obsessed with position and title. This perhaps explains his failure to grasp the difference between being a leader and occupying a leadership position.

    • Peter says:

      05:51pm | 31/07/09

      Forget the word “spin”. Replace it with propaganda. That’s what leftist politics is all about. The Party and its exulted leaders.
      Mike, I look forward to your piece on Stalin, Kruschev and Lenin.

    • Steve says:

      08:10pm | 31/07/09

      I would argue that the central philosophies of the ALP, as a labour-backed party rest on the cornerstone of a belief in structure, class and hierarchy. Having a view of a society broken down in to these so-called structures makes it easier for them to put forward their policies which are based on protecting the interests of these divisions, such as ‘working families’ and ‘blue-collar workers’. It’s not about the individual, but the collective.
      Which is utter bulltish.

    • Razor says:

      12:28am | 01/08/09

      Funny how Whitlamesque is still a description the ALP Spin meisters will do anything to avoid.

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

Time to put this summer of cricket out of its misery, writes Anthony Sharwood. Hear hear! http://bit.ly/9OLM07

David Penberthy

@geoffb oh, diddums.

David Penberthy

@Adam_Sims hell yeah. the recent past of australian tennis is in doubt!

David Penberthy

Libs reckon the future of australian tennis is in doubt due to rudd's ETS. They're smoking the same stuff as screaming lord monckton #qt

Gentle jabs to the ribs

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

Usually, when it comes to watching your favourite sport or movie on television, ads are the last thing… Read more

8 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter