Anyone trying to understand the politics of the federal health takeover purely from a policy perspective is only seeing half the picture. Beyond the rights and wrong of hospital funding is an attempt to shift the political game onto Labor’s home turf.

Can Rudd fight back on health and education? Illustration: Paul Newman

If you wanted to beat Geelong you wouldn’t go to Skilled Stadium, if you wanted to run over the Broncos you’d stay away from Lang Park because local knowledge and crowd loyalty can have a real impact on the final result.

Likewise in politics, where home ground is not dictated so much by geography, but by the issues being fought over.

If you are a right-wing party, economics and national security are your home; if you sit to the Left of centre, health and education are your sweet spot.

The following table illustrates the point:

Which party is best at handling the above issues?

The real political challenge is not policy formulation but agenda management, the ability to make the most important issue of the day an issue that delivers you a natural advantage.

The important thing to note here is we are not talking about which side has the better policies. In fact there many examples where the party with a better policy on an issue has lost when fighting away from home.

Look at the Howard era, in 1998 he won on an election promoting and unpopular new tax. The GST was never a vote-winner, but its presence at the centre of the debate meant the election was fought on economic management – home ground central for the Libs. And Labor fell right into the trap of making it the defining issue.

In 2001, when Australia was beginning to turn its back on the Coalition, Howard was at it again - turning to border security, an arena where the wind always blows behind the Coalition.

And in 2004 when the heat on the PM over a series mis-truths related to his 2001 victory, Howard masterfully switched the agenda to ‘trust’ –‘ who do you trust to keep interest rates low?’ – back to the field of economic management.

In all three elections the Liberals were playing at home, the major issue was one where they enjoyed a natural advantage.

In 2007, the pendulum swung for a range of reasons but principally because Labor managed to shift the ground its way on two important issues – climate change (the environment) and industrial relations (workers rights).

IR was a complex battle of agenda management. While Howard wanted to run WorkChoices as an economic issue, Labor (with support from the ACTU) managed to transform it into a battle for workers rights. That is they succeeded in shifting the home ground from Coalition turf to their own natural playing conditions.

This is the context to Rudd’s increased focus on health and his Deputy’s spirited foray into education.

It is an important and potentially game-changing play. It follows the failure of Labor to legislate an Emissions Trading Scheme after the Opposition changed leaders to block it and prevent Labor delivering a big policy result on its home ground.

The big switch from Turnbull to Abbott was changing the ETS from an environmental issue (Turnbull’s position) to Abbotts ‘big new tax on everything’.

See what he did? He shifted the debate onto economic management, back to Liberal turf. This is Labor will be reluctant to play that game and base the next election around climate change.

Likewise all the debate, the criticism and argy bargy with the states over health will ultimately play in Labor’s favour – so long as the issue stays on the national agenda.

Ditto education; for all the anger the MySchool website has created amongst teachers, it has put education back on the agenda - meaning Labor has another sweet spot to campaign on.

This is where the value of incumbency in the political process is really driven home; in setting the legislative agenda, the government sets the national agenda.

The choices the government makes between now and voting day will be calculated to entrench the natural advantages that Labor enjoys – and heath and education at the centre of this universe. And that’s why this year’s election is still Labor’s to lose.

16 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Micko says:

      09:52am | 09/03/10

      It is very cute that the Federal Government would make a tidy profit if they withheld 1/3 of the GST revenue in return for lifting their funding of Public Hospitals to 60 per cent.  It is very fortunate that such fundamental reform could come so cheap….it’s just the fault of health bureaucrats and incompetent state governments…all so simple now the Prime Minister has explained it to me…I never knew.

      If Rudd wants to take over the public hospital system then why doesn’t he just offer to take it over?  The States continue to put in their current funding with an agreed escalation formula – the current SPP for Federal funding to the States seems like a logical one – the feds take political responsibility…that is responsibility for service enhancements when the public demands them.  So simple…but no.

      The reason is that Rudd doesn’t want to take political responsibility, he just wants (as you correctly point out) to shift the debate to familiar territory…and have a kick at the unpopular State Premiers.  It has not occurred to him that Premiers become more popular when they are seen to be giving the feds a hard time in the interests of their state…especially in Western Australian and Queensland!

      For a bloke that doesn’t dig earwax without a commission of inquiry the suddenness of this proposal was astonishing.  Where are the details, the cost benefit analysis, where is the programmatic specificity?

      Looks like another knee jerk policy on the run disaster of the scale of the National Broadband network to me…..

    • Jonathan Appleyard says:

      10:18am | 09/03/10

      Bad policy is bad policy. This is a bad policy.

    • Paul says:

      10:48am | 09/03/10

      Why should we believe either party when Abbott/Howards crew did nothing for a decade on health, as Rudd now has for 3 years? Sounds like a tryhard talkfest, with megaphones, of some egofreaks with bigger mouths than ideas or respect for Australian health needs. This dumb Lib/Labor duopoly isn’t working for Oz.

    • Gerard says:

      11:22am | 09/03/10

      State Labor governments destroyed health. Don’t try to shift the blame to the Liberals. Just get rid of Labor and let our country survive.

    • Andrew says:

      11:41am | 09/03/10

      The truth is simple. No matter what Rudd is saying there will be a funding shortfall. GST revenues are rising at around 60% of health costs. With a growing ageing population health funding can only be met by either decreasing service levels or increasing tax.
      Sure health is safe for Labor but when this policy is found out like indigenous health, environment etc what will be this governments next “Number 1 Priority”?
      We already see the unions reverting to a workchoices scare campaign.
      I can honestly say if you want the best health system in the world (and remember we are ranked 32nd in the world) we will need to increase the Medicare levy to at least 3 - 4% or institue another tax. This is a reality. Everyone in government knows it.
      Frankly for universal first rate medical care for all Australians I would vote for an increase of 1 - 2% in income tax.
      No politician has the guts (or perhaps they think its suicidal) to lay down the facts with the Australian public and tell them “if you want the best its gunna cost you”.
      There is of course another choice, put a 100% extra tax on alcohol and cigarettes. And before anyone has a go at me please note I am a a drinker and to my chagrin a fairly heavy smoker.

    • Charlie says:

      12:16pm | 09/03/10

      Why is the table not referenced?

    • Kim says:

      02:00pm | 09/03/10

      Probably because they made it up on the spot.  I can’t really believe that the labor party has 28% against the Management of the Economy.  Now if that was a negative 28% it would be more plausible.

    • Michael says:

      12:22pm | 09/03/10

      I’m completely baffled as to why health is considered a Labor strength? Labor has completely and utterly stuffed the health system top to bottom in Qld and NSW.

    • John A Neve says:

      12:39pm | 09/03/10

      Michael,

      Just who says the health system is “utterly stuffed”, you?
      Tell us Michael what country has a better health system?
      If you can think of one, I hope you go there if and when you are sick.

      But based on your post I can believe it when you say “I’m completely baffled”.

    • Andrew says:

      01:01pm | 09/03/10

      John A Neve, clearly you haven’t done any research, you should go to http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html which shows the UN world health rankings. Australia currently sits at 32 behind such luminaries as Andorra, Portugal, Colombia and Morocco and one place ahead of Chile.

    • John A Neve says:

      01:14pm | 09/03/10

      Andrew,

      I would have thought 32 out of 190 was far from “stuffed”. Added to which you are talking about ten years ago.

      Tell us researcher, what is it today?

    • Paul says:

      12:36pm | 09/03/10

      @gerard The fact is national scale issues like health and the Murray Darling, and petrol and food cartels have been treated studiously to the same Labor / Lib, Fed/State do-nothingness and longstanding incompetence. Again, why should we vote Liberal Gerard? Be convincing and take some responsibility instead of blameshifting yourself. Fact: the Liberals don’t have a clue or plan or policy or trackrecord either. And if Abbott would outline a vision for Australia instead of hypocritically attacking Rudd, some of us swing voters would take a moment to listen to him. Instead you will cop another landslide for being incompetent,arrogant & idea-less

    • DWest says:

      02:03pm | 09/03/10

      Peter, you claim the Liberals are big & credible on national security, yet millions of Aussies believe that the Liberals War on Error was a recruitment drive for Al Quaida.  Howard was also to gutless to prosecute the big terrorism supporters the AWB. Can you back up these wild claims Peter? Perhaps you are just spinning some Liberal myths and propaganda Peter? Can you clarify your generalisation?

    • DWest says:

      03:03pm | 09/03/10

      @matt the link doesn’t work.

    • Matt says:

      07:00pm | 09/03/10

      Then go to newspoll.com.au and have a look.  Do you want me to come over later and wipe your bottom for you too?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter