We’ll chart the reaction to the Henry tax review and the government’s response here as it unfolds. All times are AEST. Refresh the page for updates.

2:30 Live blog on the Daily Telegraph now with leading accountant Anthony Bell.

2:00 Wayne Swan’s interview on 2GB this morning has ended in a clash with 2GB host Ray Hadley listen here.

11:00 The Australian is reporting that Treasurer Wayne Swan has left the door open to adopting more review recommendations in the federal budget next week.

10.25am: The miners have copped it on the share market this morning. According to AAP on opening this morning: BHP Billiton was down $1.50, or 3.68 per cent, at $39.25 while Rio Tinto was down $3.79, or 5.26 per cent, at $68.31. Fortescue Metals Group fell 18 cents or 3.93 per cent, at $4.40 and gold miner Newcrest slipped $1.13, or 3.41 per cent, to $31.96.

10.22am: Joe Hockey’s on Brisbane radio 4BC right now. You can listen here.

10.05am: South Australian treasurer Kevin Foley reckons it’s a win for the mining companies. His comments are here on AdelaideNow.

9.49am: From ABC reporter Simon Cullen on Twitter: “Abbott says Rudd’s tax response is a bit of “political jiggery-pokery”... not sure how to spell that one…”

9.42am: Wayne Swan will be taking questions from readers in a live online Q&A at the Herald Sun this morning from 10am here.

9.41am: Kevin Rudd’s going to march this morning in the Brisbane Labour Day parade. Am guessing he won’t want to get too close to the guys from the CFMEU.

9.18am: Choice reader comment from Adam:

I can see Swan reading the report…
Blah Blah Blah. Wow, mining can be taxed into oblivion. Thanks Henry.
Henry: What about the rest?
Swan: The what?

8.56am: More from Kochie ... the Sunrise host has been calling the government’s response “wimpy”. In a column for News Ltd papers today he elaborates on his view.

I suppose we should have all known this would happen. This was meant to be the tax version of the 2020 Summit. Nothing has come of that either.

8.54am: What the nation is reading... Well, it’s early days yet, ultimately it means very little and the Henry review wash-up will no doubt build interest as the day unfolds. But still, at The Australian:

and at news.com.au:

We’re on this story too: Punch fashion writer Nedahl Stelio has our coverage of the Logies red carpet here.

8.26am: Picture time - a little stunt the Coalition leader pulled last night, with a sticker over the front of the Henry review papers. “Not lower” might be a clever line but it’s not accurate across the board as company tax is to be cut, which will affect some 1.7million companies.

Here's what Abbott reckons. Pic: AAP

8.18am: Tony Abbott on AM says the resources tax is “Kevin Rudd’s plan to kill [the mining boom] stone dead”. Says he believes voters understand the importance of the mining companies to the economy, and rejects a comparison between his plan to tax bigger companies to pay for paid parental leave and the resources rent tax. Adds, however, that “in a perfect world” company taxes should be coming down. “This is a government that is absolutely allergic to anything that requires courage,” he says.

8.13am: Kevin Rudd on AM - emphasises the government’s response is a “first set of measures”. AM spoke to some voters at a pub who were enthusiastic about the superannuation increases, and also broadly happy about slugging the big mining companies. Restates his argument that Australians haven’t benefited enough from the resources boom, and that much of the profits from it have gone overseas.

7.49am... More reaction: The only new tax here is on credulity, says Simon Benson in Sydney’s Daily Telegraph.

7.26am: Kochie’s verdict. The Sunrise anchor waves around a copy of the giant Henry review papers. Says the equivalent of just a couple of pages have been adopted from the entire document.

On the compulsory super contributions rising from 9 to 12 per cent, Kochie says: “Henry didn’t recommend this at all, the government’s just pulled this out of its ... (lip-biting pause) ... you-know-what.” Points out we don’t get to 12 per cent until 2020.

Guest is Alex Malley, chief executive of Certified Practising Accountants, who says the Henry review is “exemplary”, but the “wave of reform” expected never came. Thrust of his argument is it was a missed opportunity for the government.

Kochie’s list of “no-brainers” that aren’t being implemented include simplifying deductions for work expenses, using Tax File Numbers to keep track of super, and charging GST on insurance policies.

Segment wraps up and cuts straight back to “Golden Galah!” Ray Meagher’s triumph at the Logies, and an interview with the great man himself.

7.15am: The breakfast TV shows

The Today Show leads its 7am bulletin on the government’s argument that the new tax on the profits of mining companies will help fund superannuation contributions and a cut to company tax, but also that the money will help mining towns. A short line from the opposition saying it will direct investment overseas.

On Sunrise David Koch spruiks an upcoming segment on the “no-brainers” among Henry’s recommendations the government should have introduced. The news bulletin, perhaps unsurprisingly, leads on “sentimental favourite” and “Home and Away legend” Ray Meagher winning the Gold Logie beating “Channel 7 stablemate” Rebecca Gibney. The Henry coverage leads on the PM starting the “hard sell” on the reforms by “addressing the nation on Seven’s Sunday Night program”. “The studio audience loved plans to increase compulsory superannuation to 12%,” says Natalie.

6am: The morning papers:

The Australian: Swan mines boom to boost super

Dennis Shanahan: The policy purity and the logic of the Henry tax review reforms have collided with the political reality and financial limits of a Labor government that is strapped for cash in an election year.

SMH: Swan plucks golden goose

Peter Hartcher: What are Rudd and Swan planning? They aren’t waiting for windfalls to waste them haphazardly - they’re making a pre-emptive strike on them, intending to give them away in a planned way. And the plan is? To get themselves re-elected while selling a barely plausible economic cover story.

AFR: Swan Picks the Big Tax Winners

Laura Tingle: While the government was immediately criticised for the political caution of its response ot the sweeping reform blueprint, it has put all its political eggs in the one basket - spoiling for a fight with Australia’s most prosperous industry and risking a major scare campaign about the impact of its proposals on the national economy.

Daily Telgraph: Rudd’s reform a minor tweak

Malcolm Farr: This is dangerous policy territory in the face of the Opposition’s campaign, yet to really rev up, to accuse the Government of only being good at over-taxing and then wasting the money.

8pm: News.com.au have wrapped up today’s winners and losers here. We’ll be back first thing in the morning.

6.39pm: The PM is doing an “address to the nation” on Sunday Night on Seven. They’re putting the “polly graph” over it.

5.57pm: Love this pic from News Ltd’s Ray Strange.

Picture: Ray Strange

5.19pm: The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol are upset the government didn’t adopt the recommended volumetric tax on grog, saying: “The government’s response to the Henry recommendation is disappointing, especially with the rationale that there is a wine glut. We have cask wine being promoted at $2 a litre - cheaper than some bottled water - but drinks industry lobbying has obviously won this round.’‘

5.14pm: Former PM Paul Keating has had his first nice thing to say about Kevin Rudd for a while: “In an uncertain world, this (superannuation guarantee boost) can only strengthen Australia and make the outlook for its citizens much more secure.”

5.10pm: Rudd’s on Ten News, repeating his new mantra: “super profits, super profits, super profits”.

5.07pm: The Institute of Chartered Accountants is not impressed. Its tax counsel Yasser El-Ansary said the government had the opportunity to address the structural impediments in the tax system that create complexity and a compliancy burden for business. ``Today the government failed to take that opportunity.”

4.40pm: The Daily Telegraph currently has a live blog with tax expert Dr Michael Dirkis.

4.19pm: For a visual demonstration of the difference between the Henry report and the Government’s response to it, check out this Dennis Shanahan video on The Australian’s website.

4.13pm: Joe Hockey says seven of the measures announced by Wayne Swan, including the boost to the super guarantee, are not contained in the Henry Report.

3.54pm: CPA Australia chief executive Alex Malley says the Opposition must commit to the changes to the superannuation guarantee (up from 9 per cent to 12 per cent by 2014/15) to avoid uncertainty.

3.48pm: According to 2UE’s Latika Bourke Abbott said: “This is not a plan to grow the economy, this is Kevin Rudd’s plan to kill the mining boom.”

3.43pm: According to Kevin Rudd: “The fear campaign will be large, and the fear campaign will be well-funded.”

3.33pm: Australian Industry Group chief executive Heather Ridout, who was on the Henry review panel, just said: “Henry is about the long term, and in an election year it’s hard to be about the long term.”

3.30pm: Swanny’s on the march through the press gallery. Here he is heading into the ABC

Picture: Gary Ramage

3.22pm: No one loves examining the tax system as much as the Oz’s George Megalogenis. He’s just filed the first of his reports, calling the Government’s response to Henry’s review “modest.”

3.18pm: David Speers on Sky says some of the things Henry recommended that the Government did not support included electorally unpopular suggestions such as re-tying the fuel excise to inflation, and so-called “sin taxes” on gambling and alcohol etc.

3.10pm: Wondering who came up with the term “super profits”. It makes the miners sound like they’re bullet proof, and is clearly designed to make them into the bad guy so the government can gouge them at will - Tors.

3.06pm: David Koch has just filed for News.com.au, saying:

The 1000 page report from Treasury secretary Ken Henry, and his committee, provides the blue print, the analysis and the recommendations to deliver on the promise. It’s just a pity the Federal Government has ignored most of those recommendations. And even those few it has adopted have been watered down.

3.02pm: If you want to follow the reaction on Twitter the hashtag is #Henry. Seven’s David Koch’s initial Twitter analysis is: “Review a dud. Govt wimps out.”

3pm: News.com.au says Australian workers will be up to $108,000 better off by the time they retire under the changes to the superannuation guarantee. You can read News.com.au’s precis here.

2.50pm: Wayne Swan has told Sky News that the controversial 40 per cent tax on above-than-normal profits for mining companies was to redress the fact that Australian people haven’t been getting their fair share of the boom. Sky also says Opposition Leader Tony Abbott’s immediate reading of the package was that it was “one great big new tax.”

The long-awaited review of the Tax system by Treasury boss Ken Henry, and the Government’s response, were released at 2.30pm this afternoon.

As expected the big ticket items were:

A big slug on the Australian mining industry - referred to by the Government as a resource “superprofit” tax;

Company tax to drop from 30 per cent to 28 per cent by 2014/15;

And, changes to the superannuation guarantee, that will see it rise from the current 9 per cent, to 12 per cent by 2019.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook and Twitter.

97 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Anthony says:

      02:56pm | 02/05/10

      How do I access the actual Henry Review rather than the governement’s response to the review?

    • Belinda says:

      07:02pm | 02/05/10

      if you type in “tax reform” into google
      The review is on the governmnet web site

    • Interested. says:

      09:19am | 03/05/10

      How do I download a copy of the Government’s response to the review, rather than the actual review please?

    • Mark says:

      11:37am | 03/05/10

      Yes PK because anti Rudd media is so prevalent through out the msm….....oh wait!

      Grow up. Most of his failings would not have occurred if he was placed under proper scrutiny from the get go.

    • Tory Maguire

      Tory Maguire says:

      03:13pm | 02/05/10

      I’m having trouble opening it at the moment Anthony, but if you go to taxreview.treasury.gov.au you should find it there.

    • PKelly says:

      10:43am | 03/05/10

      So will the Punch give other parties like Labor, Nats, Greens,Independants a place to express their opinions/issues, or is this going to be a one eyed, Let’s get free kicks on Rudd type coverage?

    • acker says:

      03:21pm | 02/05/10

      Looks like Rudd and Swan are not going near the fairly sensible urban congestion tax with a barge pole..to many outer urban votes at risk there I suppose…pretty gutless political leadership though…cherry pickers !

    • Jane says:

      03:41pm | 02/05/10

      They’ve dropped a lot of necessary savage recommendations because it’s an election year too.
      ...but let’s get our hands on all that mining $‘s. It’s the Socialist (Labor) way. The redistribution of wealth….hit the mining sector..YEAH..that must be a popular (read vote winning) tack!!. Any wonder WA want to secede.

      And ooooooo big ‘news’...super to go from 9% to 12%...Yawn. It was always the plan to get the super % to 15% anyway….so nothing new’ or ‘historic’ (as Swan tagged it) there. What is it with this govt determined to tag everything they do as ‘historic’...or the ‘greatest’...or ‘biggest’, to write themselves into the history books? I think there’s a psychological term for that…and it aint pretty.

      More ‘heroic’ type tripe trying to appear to ‘help the working families’ and the ‘little guy’ small business, designed to mask the real poignant stuff…that we are in HUGE debt thanks to their own incompetence, mismanagement and indiscriminant over-reaction.

      Rudd has held this under wraps for 5 long months agonising on the best ‘spin’ that can be put on it by them….and how to obscure/deflect from the bad realities. Truth is..we’re in deep debt and deep sh*t - thanks largely to their own actions and wastage so far.

    • Alice says:

      04:47pm | 02/05/10

      What a ridiculous comment! The mining business does not pay for the resources it digs out of the ground and sells at massive profit. The resources belong to everyone, hence the law that allows acquisition of deposits on private land.
      It pays royalties which has been in sharp decline over the past decade. Whislt at the same time increasing massive profit. We, the people are being ripped off. Pure & simple whilst subsidising these industries.
      Then what of the infrastructure that powers it? The governments throws in for that too. Any wonder foreign investors are banging our doors down to get in on the gravy train.

    • Matt says:

      05:35pm | 02/05/10

      Acker that’s a sad statetment..

      A congestion tax. With satellite tracker boxes in each car to tax you by the KM… That’s freedom!

    • craig says:

      05:50pm | 02/05/10

      Alice, I suspect the facts indicate minging royaties, in gross terms, have been increased over the last decade. The issue is that they flowed to the staes and Kevin has been unable to control them .

    • acker says:

      06:03pm | 02/05/10

      @Matt ..I dont think it would be a satelite tracker, more likely something like an e-tag ..if you don’t have the tag or it has expired you will be charged some astronomical fee like they do on those Melbourne tag only freeways.

      They photo your number plate and send you the bill if you don’t have a tag or phone pay within the next 24 hours after you are in there

    • Alice says:

      06:20pm | 02/05/10

      Craig
      Overall, the mining profits have ‘increased’ by a whopping $80 billion 2008-2009,whilst our loyalty payments overall have only increased by $9 billion, to governments.  It is set to increase further this financial year.
      Plus we subsidise the industry.

    • craig says:

      07:46pm | 02/05/10

      Alice, I cant see any subsdisation , the mining companios are receiving a return on their investment, their shareholders funds and borrowed capital . they pay royalties and they pay infra structure charges to the states for any ports or rail usage.  They also pay very good wage rates and their mines and plant often bring seconadary benefits to communities. Kevin and waynenow need more than their fair share to fund their ecomonic mistakes over the last 2 years. this isnt reform itis a balant tax grab to compensate for bad policy in other areas

    • Jane the elder says:

      01:03am | 03/05/10

      Alice.

      A hint for you.

      Take a look at where a LARGE part of your Superannuation is invested.

      Oops, could it be in the Resource sector?

      40% decrease in profits = what in stocks and shares and your superannuation?

      Nose and face?

      BTW - I’ve lived in a mining town.  I think the government provided the school buildings but the mine provided everything else in town, including the electricity and water and the housing for the Government employees to rent.

      I’m sorry, you’ve been misinformed.

    • Nott says:

      07:47am | 03/05/10

      Good points. Having worked in number of Mining Towns and for all the money these guys were rolling in they were tardy with spending on anything!

      This tightarsed communist mentality of the Miners (and supported historically by Liberals and Labor)  to make all the profits but rely on the state for housing and infrastructure is a backward corporate welfare culture….!

      Put some money in high tech industries and some other jobs than mining for our kids sake!

    • PeterK says:

      08:37am | 03/05/10

      All you Liberal staffers have the wrong end of the stick! More taxes equals more spindoctors and staffers and (record) State funded poltical advertising for the next election.Boo Yah!  What’s all this nonsense about the freemarket and free enterprise?

      Liberals are convenient closet Communists!

    • PKelly says:

      11:14am | 03/05/10

      It’s ironic that Abbott and his plump band of staffers are lining up to decry taking money from the Mining Industry, when Abbott has his “MiningChoices” – sending the young unemployed to jobs that don’t exist on the mines. Arguably, another form of tax on Miners.

      But taxing the Mining Industry to build infrastructure (that the Liberals studiously forgot to build!)  to grow business and jobs elsewhere is not on!

      Perhaps the Liberals are conflicted and confused? Maybe they need to gather their schizophrenic thoughts into some distinct policy before they lose the 2013 election too?

      Why exactly would we trust the Libs and Abbotts recycling of Howards-Brutopia to look after the ordinary workers that have worked hard to build wealth for our nation and companies profit margins?

    • Mark says:

      11:39am | 03/05/10

      PKelly makes me giggle and despair for the education of teenagers.

    • Robert says:

      03:36pm | 02/05/10

      From initial media reports, an appalling, gutless and un-Australian response from Rudd and Swan whose complete lack of economic credentials is blatantly obvious!
      In summary: smash the powerhouse of the economy and the sector which carried Australia through the GFC with an extreme 40% tax.
      Cripple small business by adding a flat 3% to their wages bill through an 33% increase in super contributions - there goes one job in my business!
      Failure to address the worst of taxes: eg: the payroll tax where employers who create jobs are penalised for doing so.
      This is a small business nightmare!
      What is the point in asking a specialist to overhaul the tax system and then ignore the backbones of the recommendations? (Same behaviour as having a Productivity Commission which is ignored every day).
      The Liberals, Nationals and Greens must now group together to expose this sham for what it is. Another three years of spineless Rudd and illiterate Swan will cause massive damage to this nation’s economy which three years ago was in its greatest shape ever.
      Shame on Labor for today’s decisions. Senseless, destructive, demotivating - and seriously likely to injure the goose laying the economy’s golden egg!

    • Joan says:

      07:57am | 03/05/10

      Rudd`s selection from Henry report is a vote winner for Rudd - he will have the support of the voters- the mums and dads etc as he puts it and as he did with worm at work on Channel 7 Sunday night. He gets his taxes and promises rewards to the voter. It`s all about the election this year. Rudd can’t make a hard decision - easy road for him -  rest of Henry report out into the too hard basket along with ETS

    • PKelly says:

      10:33am | 03/05/10

      Geez what a load of fearmongering. My (regional) business suffers from paying $80-150 week in extra tax because of price gouging from petrol, phone internet and banking fees!

      Will Abbott support small business or continue to sell it out? (The Nationals are as useless as tits on a bull too mate!)

      Loving this right-wing froth fest! It’s like some lefties poked you pigs and youse are squealing? Why all the panic?

    • SelenaSnail says:

      03:54pm | 02/05/10

      That will take me years to read!! I need the easy version lol

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      04:33pm | 02/05/10

      Doesn’t really cover the rampant tax evasion and tax minimization that exists in Australia. Looking like Greece all the time. More money for the Superannuation funds managers to loot but otherwise not much in nation building and hard decisions.

    • Sam says:

      04:48pm | 02/05/10

      Rudd takes a massive cop-out.

      Are we seriously shocked? This is exactly what I thought would happen.

    • craig says:

      04:52pm | 02/05/10

      this isnt reform . why did they bother commisioning the report if they were going to ignore 90 % of it. This is patch up ecomonic policy by press release, , The leaked a\most ideas to gauge the reactions and then went with soem to increase tax revenue by trageting one sector.
      what a wasted opportunity and i can only think it reflects the currwent government inability to sell its policy and illurates a lack of leadership

    • Overflow says:

      04:59pm | 02/05/10

      Root and branch tax reform ...... can anyone please tell me where I can find any??  While I don’t reject the idea of higher superannuation contributions are these gong to be offset by productivity gains or are they another slug to business??

    • Old Bert says:

      05:08pm | 02/05/10

      Great opportunity to make a quality film remake. Not like The Hollowmen, an amateurish unconvincing effort. Perhaps more like Death of a Salesman, chief protaganist,  Willy Loman, a delusionist salesman.

    • Ben81 says:

      05:12pm | 02/05/10

      Taking bets on how long it takes Rudd to say “super profits” and “working families” in the same sentence.

    • Phil says:

      10:40am | 03/05/10

      Ben81   Like every time he opens his mouth this week, he will mention Super Profits and Working Families in the same sentence.

      Massive cop out from the fraud of a PM.

      Think of the positives for the feds out of this. 3% of the national wages will extra into super, a growing base @ 15% contributions tax.

      Mind you the voters will see that the value of their superannuation a fair amount of which is invested in mining companies, goes through the floor. The returns on equity will be much lower, hence the value of the shares.

      I think Abbott will trump the super by saying which is what should have happened now by Rudd, but he has no back bone, that super will rise by double the amount that Rudd says ie to 15% but that the extra 3% paid by the employee to match the bosses amount at the same stages imput. Ie Double that of the Gov.

      Not many could argue with this one. If you expect the boss to find an extra 3% over 8 years surely you can also find the same amount.

      Keating may even come out and support this move.

    • julia says:

      05:16pm | 02/05/10

      Why are they doing this a week before the Budget? Seriously, have they got too many donors attending too many budget dinners to do real government work Tuesday week?

    • jed says:

      05:18pm | 02/05/10

      WA libs must be happy

      time for me to do the unthinkable and vote for abbott

    • Aston the Martin says:

      05:43pm | 02/05/10

      Over 10 years ?  That won’t keep pace with compounded inflation as is absolutely meaningless. And what if/when this mob get tossed out of office in the meantime ? (one can but hope).

      The best system I’ve seen is in Singapore where employers have to contribute 7% to the state run compulsory super fund and the employee also contributes 7%. The funds are used by the government for income earning infrastructure projects (e.g. the city subway) and the employee can borrow against their balance to buy a house.  Great system - and it doesn’t all fall back on the employer.

    • Pope Populus says:

      06:06pm | 02/05/10

      Announced Sun 2.5.10.  Backflip Mon 3.5.10

    • Bruce says:

      06:10pm | 02/05/10

      Why was the Henry report undertaken. In know, just to ignore it !! Dumb government found their cash cow !!

    • Adam says:

      09:39pm | 02/05/10

      I can see Swan reading the report. -Blah Blah Blah wow Mining can be taxed into oblivion. Thanks Henry.
      Henry - What about the rest.
      Swan - The what?

    • V says:

      06:22pm | 02/05/10

      Has anyone considered that a tax on ‘super’ mining profits here, just made those African mining assets look more attractive?

    • debbie says:

      06:33pm | 02/05/10

      They will bring all the nastys in by stealth,just watch,alchol will go up in the budgetthey say it for your health ..

    • Asika says:

      06:33pm | 02/05/10

      What about the people who have ‘total package’ written on their contract as opposed to ‘salary’. Won’t these people be worse off now?

    • Average Aussie Worker says:

      06:37pm | 02/05/10

      Hello.

      I’m an ordinary Australian on average wages planning to retire within the next 5 or so years.

      Firstly let’s get something straight. The resources super profits tax isn’t a tax on big business. It’s a tax that every single Australian will pay every year cleverly disguised so they won’t realise. It a sneaky tax on every Australian family and should be deplored.

      Have a look at your super fund and see how may of these mining companies are in the top 20 shareholdings. Your dividends are now subject to an extra 40% sneaky tax. I bet Wayne Swan failed to mention that.

      Not only that you’re going to be taxed twice so for every $100 available to be paid into every Australian’s superannuation fund the government will keep $40 rent tax and an additional $9 tax on earnings. So Mr and Mrs Average Australian Wage-earner tell us what you think about this Labor government taxing your super earnings at 49%. You remember Labor don’t you? They’re the friend to the worker.

      20 years ago Paul Keating introduced franking to ensure Australians weren’t taxed twice. This Labor government, the supposed friend to the Aussie worker, has thrown the “no double taxation” argument out the window.

      As share prices reflect the prospects of future profits and now that those after tax profits are going to be 40% less how much is the share price of these companies going to tumble. As every super fund holds a big lick of both BHP and RIO not to mention the smaller miners, there’s another hit to every Australian as the value of their superannuation falls to reflect the lower share prices.

      $108,000 extra over 35 years? I ask if that will compensate the lower investment returns and higher tax paid by this imaginary 30 year old. I haven’t done the sums by I’d say probably not.

      As I get older, I’ve managed to pay off the mortgage and the kids have grown and have their own incomes and for the first time in my life I have some serious cashflow to put away for my retirement. Under Paul Keating, people my age could make deductible contributions of over $100,000 to their retirement savings. In 2013, more than 20 years later what size deductible contribution can I make to fund my fast approaching retirement years. Thanks to this Labor government, the supposed friend of the Australian worker, it’s $25,000 and that includes the 9% employer contribution.

      It might have been $50,000 but because I’ve planned for my retirement and made sacrifices over the years to just put that little bit extra away every year this labor government has decided to penalise me. If I’d pissed everything up against the wall I’d be able to contribute $50,000 a year but this government rewards the financially incompetent while penalising the frugal.

      Yes I have more than $500,000 in my super. At my age I’d certainly hope so. I have five or so years to go in which to fininsh funding what could possibly be more than 30 years in retirement.

      To top it all off. this government, the supposed friend of the Australian worker, is trying to remove my only government benefit. My $500 per year private health insurance rebate. They tell me that because I now earn slightly more than the average wage I’m apparently wealthly. It sure doesn’t feel like it.

      .

    • Bin says:

      06:46pm | 02/05/10

      I agree with you, this government stinks! We need to spread the word to the masses!

    • Bruce says:

      07:39pm | 02/05/10

      Agree. except the government being “sneaky”. This government is not that smart, I would suspect blind dumb luck. I can hear Wayne Swan now, “really, really, god am I clever, huh, explain that again” !!!

    • fed up. says:

      06:57pm | 02/05/10

      Once again, Rudd and Swan are trumpeting from the rooftops about how they are making history, and protecting the ‘“working families” that they so adore, well, the way I see it, this is not tax reform, this is just another ‘great big new tax’ If these clowns think that this is really ‘tax reform’, they need to take a Bex and have a good lie down. This pathetic response to Dr Henry’s report is an absolute sham, and from the look at Henry’s face at the press conference, I’m sure that he will agree, fancy spending that amount of time and effort on producing such a valuable and enlightening way forward only to have these twits turn it into a vote grabbing exercise. Seriously folks, are these the people that should be in charge of our once wonderful country?

    • acker says:

      07:08pm | 02/05/10

      At the end of the day the mining companies will accept it, it is not as if there are many new sources of finite mining resources available on this planet, and technology is a fair way off sending rockets to get them from another planet..futile chest beating by Abbott and Robb at best

    • Ben81 says:

      07:30pm | 02/05/10

      So whenever the government does anything, whether that be passing laws or introducing new taxes, any opposition to them is “futile chest beating” because people just have to accept it?
      I think you’re already on another planet.

    • Mark says:

      11:48am | 03/05/10

      At the end of the day the mining companies will do this. Look at the investment return available in Australia. Look at it elsewhere.

      Now that KRudd has chosen to make us the highest taxing nation on miners profits the investment decision became a bit harder to justify vis Australia.

      As with the ETS (snicker) all this is is a tax grab that reduces Australian competitiveness globally.

      It is a political expedient way with little electoral cost to balanced their reckless and frivolous spending.

    • Gra says:

      07:17pm | 02/05/10

      What did people expect. WE are in the middle of the wash out of the GFC and the last thing you want to do is make wholesale changes with the risk of unexpected consequences tripping the economy. I would love to see the death of negative gearing, but how do you undo that without causing major issues in housing prices. Progressive small steps targeting different areas of the economy is the only deployment plan that is feasible.
      Targeting the long term retirement support bubble is the immediate need and is addressed. I’d love to see the end of the “death by 1000 cuts” of silly fringe taxes gone and a simple tax base to run the place.

    • Ric says:

      09:58am | 03/05/10

      GFC ???? Sorry is that the same as the “Engineered” GFC…..

      Lets sum up….... By stating a fact….. Before Rudd….. Australia was Debt free to the World BANKS…... Now after Rudd…. We are in Debt to The world Banks by Trillions…..... What Happened People???!!!....  And out of the Blue Where has The Greece financial “Crisis” come from????  Who’s been fiddling the Books Still???

    • Antenna says:

      07:18pm | 02/05/10

      All the letters are about mining. What about the windfall for Austalian workers., You know, the people who own Australia and what is in the ground and that the mining companies are selling, but beneftting only their sharholdersand not the owners?
      The loser pais deserve a return on their piece of dirt.

    • Sherlock says:

      08:23pm | 02/05/10

      Here is the perfect example of why Rudd and Swan think this is a great idea. It’s taxation by stealth. People don’t realise that we are the owners of these companies. If not direct than certainly through our investment and super funds. This is a tax that every australian family will pay. It’s people like Antenna that let governments do this.

    • Jane the elder says:

      01:12am | 03/05/10

      We’ll keep it simple for you antenna.

      Look at where your superannuation fund has mostly invested your money.

      Betcha it’s in the Resource Sector.

      So, a 40% cut in profit for that sector equals cuts in the dividends paid on your investment = less interest on your Superannuation.

      That’s just for starters…...

    • Christian Real says:

      07:54am | 03/05/10

      Regardless of this tax on mining, the mining sector will not lose and they will still make a profit, not a loss each financial year.
      The thing that is overlooked here is that superannuation will increase from 9% to 12 % and that workers will be better of.
      I notice that Howard was reluctant to tax “his big business mates” and instead allowed them to make over inflated profits during his 12 years in government, and also there was no increase in superannuation for the workers, because Howard appeased the big businesses at the expense of the workers.

    • Notty says:

      08:06am | 03/05/10

      @jane that’s incorrect… the 40% is going directly into the economy in the forms of infrastructure, education, contractors spending money. (assuming Labor and the Libs don’t waste it). You are making out the money is disappearing or being ripped off - it’s just going into better national investments.

      Super is mostly a useless resource in this Country and is a scam for the financial sector. How many people really think the super system will support all the baby boomers?

    • Arnold says:

      10:22am | 03/05/10

      Christian, you do realise that the super guarantee rate was only 7% prior to July 2000, right?  And Howard was in government then, wasn’t he?  And by the way, that wasn’t funded by taxing the mechanism that carried Australia through the biggest economic upheaval since the 1930’s an extra 40%.  Way to reward an industry, hey?

      And saying that workers are better off with 12% super guarantee is not 100% accurate.  That extra 3% will simply reduce someone’s take home pay.  Or do you really think that employers don’t consider superannuation expenses when negotiating someone’s salary?  (Hint, they do).

      So yippy. we will all have an extra 100k or so when we are 65.  Too bad we now have less income to pay off that pesky mortgage.  Tell me, how much extra interest will accrue on a 30 year home mortgage when an extra 3% of somebody’s “salary package” (remember those words Christian) is tied up in an asset that can’t be touched until at least age 55 (as the rules stand now - I personally expect more changes in this area as the government - be it Liberal or Labor - try to reduce the level of debt Australia currently has) rather than paid off of a mortgage.

      Another point for you Christian, that extra 3% being tied up in super, will generally have a large chunk invested in Australia’s mining sector.  This will have an effect on your super’s annual returns - not just on the dividends received in the fund, but also the ability for these companies to fund new projects (capital growth), as their cash reserves have also just taken a massive hit.

      Labor supporters can be so short sighted when it comes to the previous government and their achievements.

    • Dan says:

      08:35pm | 02/05/10

      This government makes me feel sick in the stomach.  First sign of a dip in the economy and what does our fearless leader do “panic”. Then he goes about wastefully spending tens of billions of tax payer dollars on dud schemes and handouts. We missed an oportunity for this country to move ahead in leaps and bounds because of our leaders incompotence.The only thing making history is the labour “Rudd” government being the worst we have ever seen. Rudd and Swan must think the CEO’s of these mining giants are as equally stupid, unfortunately I don’t think so.Anyone in business big and small knows to remain viable you must cover costs and pass them on to the end user that my friends is us.Written in anger!

    • Max Power says:

      08:42pm | 02/05/10

      Maybe if Rudd and Swan stopped selling our resource companies to China and giving them the profit from our resources, we wouldn’t need this mining tax. Instead of selling these shares in our resource sector to the Chinese, our Federal Govt should have invested some of the billions they have wasted over the last 2.5 years into these resource comapnies so that these comapnies remain 100% Australian owned and 100% of the profits stay in Australia.  When will our elected officials start putting Australia and Australian’s first, instead of selling our country and us off to the highest bidder.

    • Ted says:

      10:00pm | 02/05/10

      Hey, come to think of it that’s what the Chinese do. I wonder why they have so much cash to throw around. KRudd & Co just don’t get it but what do they care? they have their super paid for by someone else

    • Shaun says:

      09:05pm | 02/05/10

      Hmmmm, looks like the Liberal party staffers have been mobilised tonight doesn’t it? Go team, hit the blogs hard. You are all such good little cultural warriors aren’t you?

    • Christian Real says:

      08:01am | 03/05/10

      Shaun, I couldn’t agree with you more, the Liberal staffers must have been up early to hit the blogs with their diatribe, Tony Abbott must be proud of them all.

    • John says:

      09:13pm | 02/05/10

      It was a complete waste of time, this country is really becoming the have’s and have not’s. One would of hope that this government would of done something about property tax and negative gearing. But what we get is people are rewarded for doing nothing and the people who work hard get nothing.

      The days of the so called Lucky country are well and trully over, next election I am handing in a blank ballot paper. No political party is worth voting for!

    • Louisa says:

      09:15pm | 02/05/10

      Are you going to mine it yourself then Antenna?

    • Laissez-faire says:

      09:42pm | 02/05/10

      We really need to stop spending all of this money because we simply cant afford it and we might struggle with even paying back just the interest. We cant keep living beyond our means.
      A better alternative to this socialist-communist-populist budget would be to use a more Laissez-faire approach to economics. The worlds most accurate economists such as Peter Schiff and others claim that government should control under 10% of the countries GDP. Not 30% and higher.

      If we really are to have a good economy the governments involvement should be absolutely minimal. Not Maximal.

    • WallyKZ says:

      11:02pm | 02/05/10

      How about a tax on super profits of the banks?

    • whatingwithinterst says:

      08:32am | 03/05/10

      yes I agree. Perhaps if the tax could be extended to banks then they would have some encouragement to reduce fees and thus not make such obscene profits from charges against people that have no choice but to use them

      Tax reform - what a joke.

    • Michael says:

      09:33am | 03/05/10

      agreed

      why tax the mining industry so heavily when it actually contributes positively to our economy? meanwhile the banks cause the GFC, overcharge, and collude against joe pulic all the while posting “super-profits” and are allowed to continue this practice unchanged. Rudd you are ridiculous

    • Bert says:

      11:08pm | 02/05/10

      Too right Max The government has allowed sovereign wealth funds from China to take too large a stake in the mining industry. Which is literally selling of our only productive businesses to arms the Chinese government. In whose interest do you think those business will work for now? The tax grab on the mining companies seems to be in response to the first mistake of loosening the FIRB laws since the foreign government owned companies will adapt their pricing structure to transfer the profits to China. The problem with this clawback solution is that it introduces sovereign risk into our only profitable sector and will retard investment throughout the sector to pay for Rudds initial mistake compounding the problem. Listen for rising sovereign risk of investing in Australia in the international media. The idea of “super profits” is also undefined just when do the profits become not so super? I doubt if any new investment will go ahead until this is understood. I do believe we will have a loose loose situation where foreign and domestic companies will have an investment strike in Australia and divert investments elsewhere in the world generating competitors compounding our debt problems and forcing us to raise interest rates to attract foreign money. Next solution to fix this problem is when Rudd sends us further to Zimbabwe and starts the printing presses.

    • Christian Real says:

      07:23am | 03/05/10

      The Liberal governments appease these big mining companies by under taxing them and allowing them to make huge profits,while being enviromental vandals at the same time.If I was Prime Minister, I would have taxed the mining companies also, but even this 40% tax on mining companies will not compensate the enviromental damage that they do to the land, the enviroment and the rivers with the pollution that these big companies cause.

    • Nott says:

      07:50am | 03/05/10

      What about a tax on the record mega-profits of the oil and gas companies? And a infrastructure levy on the fat political donations they pass onto the Liberals?

      Time to spend on infrastructure Liberals!

    • shabangabang says:

      08:31am | 03/05/10

      This ‘tax reform’ looked like the government is going for an earlier rather than later poll. Appease as many as possible, take a cheap shot at the mining sector and herald it as the biggest thing since slice bread.
      Lock in late July or early August for the Federal election.

    • iansand says:

      09:23am | 03/05/10

      Death, taxes and political expediency trumping the national interest.

    • R says:

      09:25am | 03/05/10

      It’s going to take10 years before Rudd’s “Super” promise kicks in. By that time the 30 year olds who are going to gain $100,000 in their super funds will be 40 and they won’t see a cent until they are 67? 68? 69? More like 70.

      What will a $100,000 buy in 2050? The weekly shopping? It’s a con, just like all of Rudd’s policies - nothing changes for years and by that time old Kev will be out of office and he & his Missus will be retired on their old age pension (taxpayers money) like all good multi-millionaire politicians..

    • Hamish says:

      09:33am | 03/05/10

      The resources rent (seeking) tax is almost unbelievable. So, all companies get their tax rates reduced except mining companies. WTF? This is just punishing people for being successful. Why would the government hamstring our most competitive industry? Not only is it unfair, it is breathtakingly stupid.

      We’ll all end up paying this tax, both in terms of the increased price of goods made using raw materials (that’s pretty much everything) which will cause significant inflation as well as lost productivity due to the disincentive to actually bring major mining projects online. Oh, and as others have pointed out, it will affect share prices and therefore super fund vales.

      Mining companies already pay state-based royalties on top of standard company taxes, so this is yet another layer of taxation for our mining sector. They already pay extra tax for the right to take stuff out of the ground, it’s just that Kevvie doesn’t get it.

      The Henry Review was supposed to provide ideas for streamlining the tax system in Australia, not just provide ideas for sneaky new taxes. Yet again the Labor Party has shown it is incapable of making any serious decisions and cannot be trusted with our economy. Don’t get me started on ‘super-profits’ - not only inaccurate, but sounds like something a primary-school kid would say.

      C’mon Australia, don’t vote these clowns in again.

    • Zeta says:

      09:38am | 03/05/10

      Is ‘tax’ a backronym for ‘take alotof xanax?’ Because that’s the effect of a tax debate on the electorate’s brain. How is it that even a wombat fondling career bureaucrat can still make this stuff boring?

    • Tory Maguire

      Tory Maguire says:

      10:05am | 03/05/10

      I wonder if Claudia Karvan has an opinion on the Henry Review?

    • Zeta says:

      10:15am | 03/05/10

      @ Tors - When Claudia and I were having breakfast this morning, she indicated her broad support for a progressive expenditure tax, which lead to a lengthy argument concerning our respective views on the experimental economic policies of Mark Latham.

      I just don’t think we’re going to work out to be honest.

    • Liberalfan says:

      09:42am | 03/05/10

      I am 29, I don’t work in the mines or own a mine nor do I know anyone who does. I hope Tony supports this tax because I went through it with my dad last night and I have to much to gain for Tony to vote this down. If push comes to shove I will vote in favour of this tax by voting Labor. My family and I can only hope Tony see’s reason

    • Anjuli says:

      10:03am | 03/05/10

      Where would the government get money from if the mining companies all went to Africa for the resources, moth balled the mines , the workers lost their jobs with huge wages with big taxes .The taxes would be lost the workers then could claim Centre Link until they were able to find another job While at the end of the financial year they were able to get all their tax back on their tax return.It is just a scenario and I know it is not going to happen, but some it might .
      What did Garrett say,was it, we will change every thing when we get in.

    • BigBob says:

      10:17am | 03/05/10

      Jobs won’t be lost,they can’t get enough workers now to fill the positions they need, man of these mines are open cut ,the mines of days gone past where people crawled into a hole in the ground have vanished. They have not got enough skilled workers to fill these positions that is how Abbotts crazy idea to stop the dole for under 30 year olds came into play. To force them into working in the mining industy, trouble is you need to be skilled or the mines won’t take you.
      Scare Campaigns will abound over this but remember the mines are making a huge profit. They won’t walk away from that.

    • Hamish says:

      10:07am | 03/05/10

      Why? Punitive taxation of our most successful and competitive industry benefits nobody…nobody in Australia anyway.

    • Christian Real says:

      10:26am | 03/05/10

      It appears that most of the comments attack the 40% tax on mining companies, but this tax is a mere drop in the ocean considering the huge annual profits that these mining companies make and the hefty donations that these mining companies give to the Liberal party .
      Then there is the enviromental damage that these companies cause with pollution and other enviromental damage to rivers.
      Personally, I don’t believe that 40% is enough tax on these enviromental vandals,and after 12 years of the Liberal government appeasing them,and pandering to them for their huge donations to boost Liberal party coffers, it is about time that they payed their way,instead of the lower income workers being slugged, while these companies sit back and enjoy the over inflated profits that they are making..

    • Hamish says:

      11:38am | 03/05/10

      Christian,

      Mining companies already pay extra taxes to state governments in the form of mining royalties in exchange for taking communal resources out of the ground. This form of taxation predates company taxes and has been around for ages.

      If you’re so worried about environmental vandalism, I assume you don’t use anything made from resources gathered through mining. Oh that’s right of course you do. Everyone does. Maybe you could actually be a bit thankful to these companies for providing materials to make products which you use each and every day? And if you still want to be hypocritical you could be thankful for the 18% of total company taxes that mining companies already pay.

      Re the donations comment, I think you’ll find as with most major companies/industries, miners probably give money to both major parties. It would be interesting to hear your views on by far Australia’s largest political donors, Unions, who provide just the one party with millions upon millions of dollars every year.

    • Eye4anEye says:

      07:15pm | 03/05/10

      Multiple posts pushing your agenda is tacky and makes people thing you have a hidden/vested interest in the subject…....or that your a one eyed hardline nut.

    • Eye4anEye says:

      07:41pm | 03/05/10

      They paid the same tax as every other company - and now it looks like Labor want to tax them more than everyone else (called tall poppy syndrome). Their “super” profits are super because of the size of the companies involved.

      As most people have already said it’s a tax grab and an unfair one - Australia used to be about a fair go….looks like the definition of fair has changed.

    • AdamC says:

      10:27am | 03/05/10

      At the risk of neglecting the issue at hand in favour of a partisan spray – seriously, what is the story with this government? How is it that people still support this gang who have either dropped or stuffed-up everything in their first term of office?

      And furthermore, what about the people who voted for Kruddy, Swansong and the gang in the expectation they might actually accomplish something? Let’s examine: ETS, dropped; tax reform, effectively dropped; BER, stuffed-up; battgate, a disaster; education reform, a mess; new tax on mining, a joke.

      What are the true believers doing now?

    • Christian Real says:

      10:38am | 03/05/10

      Could the media please reveal just how much these mining companies, made from 1996 to this present year of 2010 and how much tax they actually paid annually, how much profit they actually made annually, and also how much money from these mining companies went in way of donations(and the size of these donations) to the Liberal/National party coffers.
      It would appear to be seen, that under the 12 years of Liberal government, these mining companies were appeased and looked after,and in return the Liberal party received huge donations and other benefits from them.

    • Mark says:

      12:52pm | 03/05/10

      Nice conspiracy theory.

      Care to back any of that up at all with some, oh i don’t know, facts?

      Helloooo in there…anyone home??????

      I applaud you for this ramble though. It made me smile and think of stuff like teddy bears and puppies.

    • Peter says:

      10:51am | 03/05/10

      This is a load of DRIVEL.  I could have done better in an hour and only cost a carton of beer.  First,  this is grand standing on a massive scale.  Who in their right mind would even dream of such rubish.  No wonder the GOVERNMENT REJECTED the bulk of it.  Every king of slap in the face for working people.  BUT Kevin and Wayne will save the people from this disaster by rejecting the recommendations.

    • Discsted a little boys says:

      11:11am | 03/05/10

      I don’t know about anybody else but I am getting sick and ties of Abbot and Hockey bleating how bad hings are. Personally I have not heard either of them come up with anything but negative thinking, if that continues there is no way they will get my vote. Just a thought if the governments reforms are that bad why not let them run and destroy themselves instead of this stupid, childish, schoolboy and immature blocking. If the reforms fall in hole the libs then can say ‘We told you so” Or don’t they have the guts to do so. To me the Libs are a pack wimps and I am a Lib voter

    • Horizons says:

      11:36am | 03/05/10

      I can understand Abbotts ire, after all he was going to tax big buisness for his maternity scheme and Rudd has gazumped him with a much fairer plan. Rudd’s way it goes to all Australians. The mines will survive they are making a mottza out of the stuff that is in our ground. You got to expect them to complain, after all they just love the profits.!! They won’t walk away from Australian mining they have to much to lose. My children will benifit from this far more than I will, but I am more than happy to vote for this tax

    • tim says:

      06:48am | 04/05/10

      The tax on resource companies is a good idea. It slaps a tax on China which is fair enough, make them pay. I am hopefull we don’t lose any large mining projects though.
      Rudd ignoring the other 135.5 recommendations from Henry’s report is a joke. root and branch reform? laughable. Rudd is making a habit of promising a lot and delivering very little.

    • registry cleaner reviews says:

      12:38pm | 27/07/10

      I enjoy reading the report, too. It?s easy to understand that a journey like this is the biggest event in ones

      life.

    • Cristy Riddle says:

      09:44am | 26/11/10

      Can your site handle heavy traffic? Because it seems to be on a major spam list somewhere…
      Let us all express our opinions here. Do you think random babbles like this should be allowed to hang in threads or should they be erased? Share your opinions.
      I write like mad, every day, and no one visits my blog, that looks similar to yours. What could I be doing wrong?
      I’m a little bit eccentric, and sometimes my comments get removed. I just want to add some spark.

      Press Ctrl-Alt-Del for unlimited access to this system.

    • private tours in Russia says:

      07:09pm | 01/12/10

      thanks amigo! great post!

    • making money easy says:

      04:07pm | 16/06/11

      Many thanks for posting this, It?s simply what I was researching for on bing. I?d lots comparatively hear opinions from an individual, barely than a company internet page, that?s why I like blogs so significantly. Many thanks!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter