Four months after the federal government received Ken Henry’s recommendations for tax reform we still don’t have a clear indication of what that reform might look like.

Not amused. Ken Henry and Rudd's press secretary (laughing bloke) have differing approaches to tax policy. Picture Ray Strange

While the Henry Review unquestionably provides a long term agenda for reform, overall the lack of intent and guidance around the government’s thinking is frustrating.

There is no doubt that Australia needs a simpler, more efficient taxation system.

With more than 125 taxes currently the Government’s has not taken the opportunity to repeal one tax but has instead decided to impose a $10 billion a year tax on the resources sector.

Unfortunately the Government’s response directly addresses very few of Henry’s recommendations. Just four have been adopted, 29 wholly or partially rejected and 114 earmarked for further consultation as part of the ‘mature tax debate’ the Treasurer has called for over the coming years.

It makes you wonder why the Government waited so long to release the report and its response.

The widespread deferral or rejection of most of the report’s recommendations is clearly designed to minimise adverse impacts on the federal budget in 2011-12 to fast track a return towards a balanced budget.

The government has also avoided in the short term politically difficult reforms to road pricing, land tax on family homes, negative gearing changes and alcohol excise reforms.

Most of the Henry’s suggested reforms seek to leave the total tax collected broadly neutral but the reforms target simplicity, equity and rationalization of smaller state taxes to provide efficiency gains.

The proposed changes to simplify individual tax returns are welcome, but with more than 70 per cent of lower and middle-income Australians requiring help to complete tax returns the postponement of these changes are disappointing and should be expedited.

The most widely speculated recommendation of a ‘resource rent tax’ has been adopted and is slated for introduction in FY13.

The Government’s decision to implement a resources super profit tax certainly represents the industry’s worst fears.

The Government has formed a view that it is reasonable for the industry to give back to the community via the RSPT but we need to be very careful that we don’t make our resources industry uncompetitive internationally given the importance of the sector to the Australian economy.

It’s not all bad news, though.

The cut in the company tax rate to 29 per cent in FY14 and 28 per cent in FY15 is slow but steady progress to a more OECD competitive tax regime.

Small business will benefit from an earlier introduction of this tax cut, but adopting Ken Henry’s recommendation of a 25 per cent rate would have further boosted international competitiveness.

The lift from a nine per cent superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent is good news for the country’s savings. By 2020 this move will boost national saving and support long term economic growth.

Overall the Government’s response to 18 months of work by the Treasury Secretary has been vague and hasn’t provided us with a roadmap for structural taxation reform.

If tax reform is as important as the government says it is then we need a clearer and stronger agenda around taking Ken Henry’s recommendations forward.

23 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Radical Chick says:

      07:52pm | 02/05/10

      We don’t know yet what Tony Abbott is saying about it but if he rejects the Resources sector new super tax it is possible it won’t be implemented as this Government apparently does what Abbott says( see ETS). I am not convinced this Super Tax will go ahead.
      Generally I don’t think this was a reform at all…...the work that they have done is quite sloppy.
      I wish this Government would make compliance easier…..it does not appear that they will…...and there is not an overall theme on this reform. It doesn’t look like a structural reform of the Australian system. It looks like a tax grab!!

    • jed says:

      08:12pm | 02/05/10

      it’s nice work - tax the ring hole out of miners to up our super, but then depress our super in the process because miners make up huge holdings in super funds. some funds will drop 3% this week alone.

      how much longer to we have to suffer this idiot. it’s a sad day when you have to vote abbott to improve the joint.

    • stephen says:

      08:20pm | 02/05/10

      Of course it is a tax grab. The mining sector has never paid its due tax.
      Their accountants and economists knew that, and now they have been caught out.
      Accountants and economists never own up to anything, and their Companies must be punished, punished like a bad bad dog.

      ( What goes around comes around, and bad Capitalists just hate that.)

    • Eye4anEye says:

      07:44pm | 04/05/10

      your source for this stunning tax evasion by miners? Miners pay the same tax as every other company and then royalties on top of that.
      Looks like a tax grab, smells like a tax grab it is a tax grab…...with a side of tall poppy syndrome.

    • Sherlock says:

      10:57pm | 02/05/10

      Isn’t this exactly what we predicted three years ago. Elect a Labor government and they’ll spend like drunken soldiers, put the budget into deficit and than be forced to raise taxes to try and pay for it all.

      The Rudd government has wasted so much money it needs new taxes to put its budget back on even keel.

      Time and time again the left told us that the Howard government was the biggest taxing government of all time. Rudd makes Howard look like an amateur when it comes to collecting taxes yet for some reason high taxes are no longer a problem to the left.

      I think Laborites are embarrassed by just how inept this government has been. Yet they’ll probably vote them in again to spite themselves.

      At least Rudd has written himself into the history books as Australia’s worst ever Prime Minister. When his time comes Gough Whitlam can pass into the next life content the baton has been given to a worthy successor.

    • robert smissen says:

      11:16pm | 02/05/10

      Stand back, stand back! ! As the mining industry stampedes out of Oz! !

    • Darryl Price says:

      06:18am | 03/05/10

      What an ingenious idea! Wow! It is unfortunate for Ken Henry that the other 98% of his output over the past 2 years sits on the shelf (next to the NBN tender).

    • Craig says:

      11:53am | 03/05/10

      haha, where to?
      vale to bhp: ‘please, come and join us’. as if..

    • bill says:

      12:00am | 03/05/10

      I think the government has allowed sovereign wealth funds from China to take too large a stake in the mining industry please correct me if I am wrong about this. Which is literally selling of our only productive and profitable businesses to arms the Chinese government. In whose interest do you think those business will work for now? The tax grab on the mining companies seems to be in response to the first mistake of loosening the FIRB laws since the foreign government owned companies will adapt their pricing structure to transfer the profits to China. The problem with this clawback solution is that it introduces sovereign risk into our only profitable sector and will retard investment throughout the sector to pay for Rudds initial mistake. Listen for rising sovereign risk of investing in Australia in the international media. The idea of “super profits” is also undefined just when do the profits become not so super all new investment will cease until the “super profits” condition is over and there is no prospect of them being reintroduced. It may lead to a lose lose situation where foreign and domestic companies will have an investment strike in Australia and divert investments elsewhere in the world speeding up the generation of competitors compounding our debt problems(and forcing us to raise interest rates to attract foreign money. Until then Rudd may offer us his next “solution” to his previous 2 problems sending us further to Zimbabwe and starts printing money as fast as he can.
      Devaluing these mining companies which make up a large portion of super fund investment is Dumb. Also expecting the electorate to swallow that this is good tax reform is also stupid. Please Rudd and Swan stop destroying the economy for the sake of political expediency.

    • Matt Dee says:

      12:06am | 03/05/10

      And yet another half baked, half cocked policy by this terrible Labor government. No one knows what the true substance is of anything Kevin Rudd has proposed since his election to power. This clown has to go for the future of Australia.

    • Edward James says:

      09:32am | 03/05/10

      I read nothing newsworthy, this amounts to a list of changes, which are entirely dependent upon the return of Federal Labor for another four years. With a history of breaking all sorts of promises, this must be the sounding of the last drinks for Federal Labor. Edward James

    • Craig says:

      10:37am | 03/05/10

      Another do-nothing exercise from a populist, do-nothing excuse for a Prime Minister. Get rid of these Labor jokes for the good of the country!

    • Saskia says:

      10:53am | 03/05/10

      Hey all of you Labor voters - you must be proud of yourselves.

      No wonder no one admits to voting ALP.

    • BTS says:

      11:26am | 03/05/10

      I voted Labour last time, purely based on work choices, not because I like the party.  Anything to return rights to the every day worker.

    • Henry says:

      12:01pm | 03/05/10

      Come off it.  I was on an AWA and it was actually better than the previous contract!  The Union scare campaign was just to save their own position as middle men.

    • BTS says:

      12:09pm | 03/05/10

      Tens of thousands weren’t.

    • Mark says:

      12:22pm | 03/05/10

      Any facts in the BTS or just a wild guess?

      Sucked in by the propaganda too I see.

    • BTS says:

      01:03pm | 03/05/10

      Here’s something for you to chew on Mark,

      Exemption of companies with fewer than 101 employees from unfair dismissal laws - so tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands lost the right to appeal being unfairly dismissed. 

      Fact.  Not a wild guess.  Just because you are swayed by propoganda, doesn’t mean others as as easily influenced.

    • Andrew Freeburn says:

      01:55pm | 03/05/10

      Here’s something for you to absorb BTS,
      in the months after work choices were introduced, unemployment fell.
      (don’t take me word for it, check the facts) because small business could again employ workers without the fear of being stuck with useless bums that were too hard to fire.

    • Mark says:

      03:14pm | 03/05/10

      Oh Andrew BTS doesn’t care. All he wants is the comrades in a sinecure for life.

      A good question to ask BTS is how many of these “hundreds of thousands” lost their job unfairly and took to the streets and papers in protest at their unfair treatment?

      Hmmm, was it like ..... none? Where were all the tales of woe? Where was all the hardship?

      B=Nice advertising and scare campaign. Going to try it out again this time around? No new ideas? Need to play blame game stuff now the rest of the timetable and “policy” (well they said they had some seems they are all to hard or completely stuffed) is gone.

      Love your work BTS. I will file it under f for fiction. Toodles.

    • sleepy says:

      12:44pm | 03/05/10

      Imposed 2013 or 2014, who cares.  KRudd won’t be in government.  These sort of ‘promises’ are just political spin, they mean absolutely nothing!!.  2014 is th same year as the election after this.  This is just straight up and down another typical Labor promise right up there with ‘no child shall be in poverty . . . ’  Can the GG please stand up and get rid of these idiots now for the safety of the country.  Ooops not going to happen as she is a political appointee as well.

    • FedUp says:

      01:29pm | 03/05/10

      How’s that worked out for you BTS? I too got duped by the lies in the Workchoices adds and now I don’t have a job - I’m hoping to hear back at the end of the week, so maybe I will soon, but I was much better off before this idiot government got elected, funded by the unions using tens of millions of dollars from workers (me and you) to run adds full of BS. Now they think we’re stupid enough to fall for it again. Funny how the Unions have been noticeably quiet about people dying on the job. I thought they represented the workers, but this current lot obviously just represent the ALP Government and workers can pay for their election contribution to Labor and then go to hell.

    • forex robot says:

      05:26pm | 23/05/10

      Terrific work! This is the type of information that should be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter