A friend remarked this morning that being told you can’t use Internet Explorer, as governments around the world are advising, is like being ordered to get to work without using roads.

After banning Explorer maybe we could start using these again too.

This would be inconvenient but sufferable as we could all probably do with a good walk. But tortuously, in this situation even starting such a walk involves making a phone call to your IT helpdesk.

With respect to my IT administrator friends I’ll bet many people would rather take their chances with the criminals.

I feel doubly sorry for anyone stuck on Internet Explorer because not only does it have a security problem but it is also one of the worst ways to browse the web.

Put aside the fact that other browsers like Firefox and Chrome are often faster and easier to use - on older versions of IE pages don’t display properly, links don’t work, and you’re always getting little “Bah-bah!” messages alerting you that you need a more recent version of Flash or Adobe reader or whatever else. Major sites like YouTube and Twitter have given up trying to make their sites work properly on IE6. It just can’t keep up with the content on the modern web.

If you’re working in a big company or in government it’s a good bet that you’re stuck with Internet Explorer. This is just the reality of life in many big organisations where Microsoft infrastructure powers the networks.

Was this always going to happen? The Microsoft software suite is so vast that it was always inevitable that security loopholes would be found and exploited; it’s logistically impossible for a company to defend itself from all the possible avenues of attack.

In total some two-thirds of all browsers worldwide are some version of Internet Explorer. Ars Technica reported this month that roughly another 25 per cent of browsers are Firefox and the rest is a mish-mash of nice products, with Google’s new Chrome being the rapidly-rising choice for many.

But perhaps security problems with your browser are things we’ll need to get used to. Switching browsers won’t be enough; it’s a bit like moving house because you’re worried about getting robbed but then buying a new place with no locks on the doors.

The web is here to stay and so is cyber crime, like its urban equivalent.

If everyone moves to the new browser, the criminals will just start targeting that one instead – and the non-Microsoft products may be less secure than IE. A 2009 report by American IT security company Cenzic found that IE accounted for only 15 per cent of the security loopholes it found in a survey of browsers. Almost half – some 44 per cent – of the vulnerabilities were in Firefox, and 35 per cent were in Safari.

So it turns out IE may be one of the most secure, but a bit like Lara Bingle’s Aston Martin, it’s just asking to be broken into.

Follow me on Twitter: @colgo

Most commented

15 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Harquebus says:

      12:26pm | 20/01/10

      M$ licenses us to use faulty products and then charges us to protect it. Brilliant!

    • Rhys says:

      12:28pm | 20/01/10

      Saying that more security holes were found in Firefox and Safari (which is powered by the open source webkit project) is slightly disingenuous. Those browsers have a much shorter time between the discovery of a remote exploit and a patch, they also disclose 100% of the security vulnerabilities that they discover as their bug tracking systems are publicly available. Microsoft frequently gets bashed by security researchers for not addressing exploits until they are being attacked in the wild - often many months after the exploits are discovered and reported to them.

    • Dingo_aus says:

      12:36pm | 20/01/10

      The reason Firefox had the most vulnerabilities patched is because it is open source and anyone can see the problems in the code to fix them (before hackers exploit them).

      IE is closed source, therefore only a few people can see it’s code. Just because Firefox is ahead of the hackers and patching vulnerabilities at a much faster pace than IE does not make IE implictly safer. Quite the opposite.

    • TheBigMicka says:

      01:25pm | 20/01/10

      Why can’t people just be honest?  And use the web for it’s originally intended purpose…pornography.

    • Eno says:

      01:51pm | 20/01/10

      I find this hilarious.. it’s like anything else - Windows is the de facto standard for all government & business so I use a different one.  Windows is the one that’s gonna have the money & time spent on it to hack. Hacking me isn’t interesting - hacking the government is fun.

      Same thing with Security software - buying the best seller probably isnt the best idea - that’s the one that’s gonna be hacked first.. once again I use a different one.

    • N says:

      01:56pm | 20/01/10

      This security hole is in IE6 only. MS had advised last year that users of this browser move to IE8 as IE6 was being phased out and would have limited support. Considering the age of this browser (released in 2001), expecting it to be totally secure in today’s online world is complete foolishness. 

      Not quite sure why this is such a beat up unless media companies have significant stock holdings in Google or looking to buy MS stock cheap on the news.

    • Bugalug says:

      02:26pm | 20/01/10

      N:
      See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/19/microsoft_emergency_patch/
      Exploit demonstrated in IE8 and partial exploit in IE7.  This is a big issue because of the install base of IE.  Security through obscurity is not generally good practice, but in this instance it looks like the best option available in the short term.

    • wolf says:

      02:30pm | 20/01/10

      Anyone who uses microsofts crap software (and pays for the priviledge) deserves everything they get.

    • Harquebus says:

      12:04pm | 21/01/10

      I agree.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      02:33pm | 20/01/10

      Firefox for life!

    • jim says:

      03:49pm | 20/01/10

      I was going to say, what a few of these comments have already said. Other web-browsers are open source and often patch things very quickly compared to IE.

      But comeon Paul, where did you get that source of information from? Security experts from Microsoft so scared that people are going to move away from IE in droves? I didn’t feel it’s a convincing statement.

      Lets take viruses Literally. How does a species combat viruses? You have an immune system which is like a patch. But the real defence is Genetic Variance.

      Genetic Variance allows species to be more immune. Likewise by having more web-browsers out there with more variance, would therefore ensure that cyber criminals have a harder task to hack.

      This is all Microsofts doing, being a monopoly in the webspace. They ought to just let go and let the environment flourish without them trampling around with IE.

    • Brando says:

      04:02pm | 20/01/10

      Gee Paul I’m sorry you have so much trouble using internet explorer. I can’t really say I know how you feel because just like the overwhelming majority of computer users, IE is my browser at both home and work and I manage to get around the net quite easily with little if any problems.

      Perhaps you just need some basic computer training.

    • iansand says:

      06:34pm | 20/01/10

      Brando s@ 05:02pm MS chases Firefox and other browsers.  For how long have you enjoyed tab browsing, for example?  I know that I have used it for about 3 years longer than you.

    • Simon says:

      01:18am | 21/01/10

      When I saw this it kind of reminded me that internet explorer even existed.

      I use Google Chrome and Firefox

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter