AS Kevin Rudd ploughs through the media analysis of his political woes and weighs the counsel of advisers and the trends identified by pollsters, the man known as Kevin 24/7 may be in need of some more homespun and maternal advice.

Now, what's the Mandarin word for buggered?

Kevin, it’s past your bedtime. Get some sleep.

The fatigue factor has been largely unexplored in the context of the Prime Minister’s poll slump and the corresponding surge by Opposition Leader Tony Abbott. There has been a longstanding and well-documented view within Labor circles that Rudd’s workload and sleeping habits are so punishing as to be unsustainable.

The turnover of staff, not just working for Rudd but other ministers, has become the stuff of legend. It was reported in October last year that Rudd had lost 23 of 39 staff, Julia Gillard had lost 13, and Wayne Swan and Penny Wong had each lost 10.

Although Rudd is now in domestic mode for this election year, his globetrotting exploits must have knocked him around during the past couple of years.

In November last year The Daily Telegraph’s Malcolm Farr chronicled one of Rudd’s mad jaunts, which read like the policy wonk’s equivalent of a weekend away with a country footy team. In the course of three days Rudd and his team got up at 4am to fly from Afghanistan to India and the next day were in Singapore where, addressing a university audience, Rudd deadpanned: “It’s been busy.”

One staff member told Farr that Rudd and his team averaged just three hours’ sleep a night during the full six days of the trip.

It’s the kind of stuff that invites bravado. Many people like to push themselves on occasion, during the weekend or in the December Christmas party season, or pull the odd all-nighter at work, but the experts say that it cannot be sustained.

While refusing to offer any specific thoughts on the sleeping habits of our Prime Minister, University of Sydney professor of sleep medicine Ron Grunstein says the idea that even the most talented and gifted people can get by indefinitely on little or no sleep is a myth.

Grunstein cites examples such as former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, a four hours a night woman who later in her career was often seen dozing and famously passed out face-first into the podium at a Tory conference. Tony Blair got by for years on about four hours a night and lots of coffee, but his diagnosis with arrhythmia was attributed to decades of insufficient sleep.

And while it’s the blue-collar workplace that often provides the most tragic examples of the effect of worker fatigue, Grunstein says exhaustion was identified as a key factor in incidents such as the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear meltdown, when engineers had been working 100-hour weeks, or the Challenger space shuttle disaster earlier that year, when NASA crews had been working so busily to hit the launch date that someone forgot to check the O-rings.

“If a person says they sleep four hours a night, and never recover and never catch up, it’s a myth that they can get by on that forever,” Grunstein says. “Genetics play a part. Some people are better equipped to deal with it than others, but it doesn’t matter who you are, it eventually catches up with you.”

There was something in Rudd’s demeanour last Sunday, when he launched what has been described as the orgy of self-flagellation, that had a mildly defeatist or brow-beaten air about it that could stem from fatigue. Both Labor and Liberal MPs were surprised by the repetitious nature of Rudd’s contrition, with his mantra-like references on ABC1’s Insiders to the whacking he expected in the polls.

Equally, his handling of the insulation fiasco suggested a kind of listlessness or distraction. In the course of a few days Peter Garrett went from being an excellent minister and the insulation scheme a brilliant idea to Garrett being a humiliated and demoted minister and the scheme a dead duck, the subject of its very own rescue package.

If Rudd realised at the end of last year that he had been burning the candle at both ends, the timing of his first genuine break was, in retrospect, less than ideal.

The Prime Minister took off pretty much all of January, when new Opposition Leader Tony Abbott was holding a press conference every day, be it clad or otherwise, often looking more like the Alby Mangels of politics as he’d come charging out of the surf to issue a quick one-liner about Rudd’s great big tax on everything.

Abbott used that four-week stretch to reintroduce himself to the people of Australia, and he did it without being challenged by the incumbent.

Much was made of his prodigious work ethic during that period and since. But it can’t have been that hard for the bloke.

The difference between Rudd and Abbott is this: Rudd basically hasn’t had a proper night’s sleep in about four years. In the final year of Kim Beazley’s leadership Rudd was obsessive and vigilant in positioning himself for the job, lobbying his colleagues, courting the media. He then worked tirelessly before the election and, aside from his break this January, has not really stopped since.

Abbott, by his own admission, has hardly done a thing for two years. He went AWOL after the 2007 election defeat. He publicly likened the loss to a bereavement; he even complained about readjusting to a lowly backbencher’s salary; he had a bit of a sulk when Malcolm Turnbull passed him over for shadow treasury. In short, after the rigours of being in government, he took things pretty easy as part of an opposition that he didn’t think was going anywhere.

So the contest is now between a guy who has been working like a maniac for about four years, surrounded by staff and MPs who are suddenly worried that they might lose, v a guy who’s just come off the bench after a luxuriant rest and is surrounded by staff and MPs who are suddenly thinking they may be able to win.

85 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Andrew says:

      05:48am | 06/03/10

      I think Rudds problem is he has gone into shock after the last couple of polls. He had himself up on a pedistal, became used to the media adulation and no opposition to make him accountable. He thought he could do nothing wrong in the eyes of the public. Then came along Abbott, who Rudd thought would be treated as a joke by the media (which is what had happened with Nelson and Turnbull) and the voters, and he would just continue through as is and easily win the unloseable election. He is now trying to come to terms with opposition accountability and media scrutiny which he has not had to deal with before. His halo has slipped and he’s choking on it. This is the result of being full of yourself and way over confident.

    • Steve Turner says:

      05:43pm | 06/03/10

      I agree Andrew, but why has it taken three years since Rudd was elected ALP leader for MSM to begin some meanifull scrutinity.

    • Polly says:

      06:17am | 06/03/10

      Before you cast your vote this year think about 2 things…...One: What has KRudd done in 4 years that is of any real significance to Australia? Two: This guy wants to tax you out of existence whether it is the ETS or a new tax in regards to the federal take over of health. Think about the way Labor has run the states into the ground and how KRudd is doing this on a national level.

    • Sherlock says:

      01:35pm | 06/03/10

      Too Right Polly and more and more Australians are seeing Rudd and his government for what they are. It’s easy to promise something and never deliver. People will trust you for the first few times but more and more see through you every time you open your mouth.

      If hospitals could us spin doctors to replace real doctors then Rudd could have the world’s best hospital plan

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      05:23pm | 07/03/10

      Polly that’s not waffle, Little Kevvy by the time he is turfed out will have taken The Land of Oz to a far, far worse place than Whitlam did between 1972 to 1975, in fact Little Kevvy will make Whitlam seem to be a conservative by comparison.

    • Alice says:

      07:24pm | 07/03/10

      For starters Polly, Rudd has only been in power for just over 2 years.
      Let’s not forget that it was Howard who announced an ETS as Coalition policy which the ALP said win or lose they would back.
      What new tax Polly?
      Have you looked closely at Abbott’s environment policy? Either he raises old taxes or introduces new ones. Not my words Polly, the economists because under Abbott’s scheme the voters bare the total cost of the policy. Industry pays nothing. And they assure us that this is the way the world is going. Well come on Abbott & Co. if that’s the truth give us an ironclad guarantee that the Coalition will not introduce an ETS. Thus far all have refused to rule an ETS out as policy in the future.
      11.6 years of Coalition government what did they do? The one and only claim for good management.
      Stockpiled taxpayers money whilst the house was falling into disrepair.

    • Paul says:

      06:33am | 06/03/10

      Good point but equally what about us swinging voters getting fatigue from Tony’s 24/7 policy riffing and improvisation? As much as the Rudd valium show is tiring, I am developing a case of T.D.D. - Tony unDeficit Disorder.  Perhaps Tony is getting a good nights sleep expecting a whole stack of policy to come to him in his dreams? Or a blinding flash from the divine? Yawn.

    • Tony says:

      10:47am | 06/03/10

      Yeah Paul, it is a bit that way isn’t it. As a swinging voter myself, let them loose the sleep - I’m not going to.

      Perhaps in 2013 there will be some real candidates on both sides, till then - zzzzzzz

    • Ryan says:

      09:17pm | 06/03/10

      @Tony: sure go back to sleep and whinge about having no money because Labor brought in an Extra Tax Scheme that is emptying your wallet of every last spare penny you had for absolutely no gain whatsoever.

    • persephone says:

      05:57am | 07/03/10

      Ryan

      Labor hasn’t brought in an extra tax scheme.  It has in fact lowered personal taxes.

      If you’re referring the ETS, firstly, it will put money in people’s pockets and secondly, it’s not a tax.

    • Ryan says:

      08:36pm | 07/03/10

      @persephone: whatever you say pal, its a tax plain and simple and worse still, the level of said tax will be determined by the “investors” meaning countries like China can and will eventually be dictating our tax rate. Do keep spruiking the “put money in people’s pockets” line though, it does make for a good laugh out loud.

    • persephone says:

      08:25am | 08/03/10

      Well, regardless, Ryan, I’d rather pay higher taxes for good services than have those services cut in a frenzy of hand outs…which is what Tony Abbott’s ‘Direct Inaction’ plan is about.

      Abbott’s promised over $3 billion of expenditure in the next three years without being able to tell anyone where a cent of that’s going to come from.

      If he’s not going to raise taxes, he must be either going into more debt or cutting services.

      I’ll assume he’s not going into debt, because that’s just too scary for him.

      So what’s he going to cut? And why won’t he be upfront and honest and manly and just tell us?

    • Ryan says:

      10:08am | 08/03/10

      @persephone: why can Labor not come up with any workable ideas themselves, instead we see them shouting “oh you have no polices blah blah” yet as soon as any other party puts out a policy that seems even half viable Mr Me Too jumps on it and claims it as his own. If you want an answer as to why no one is public with their policies, its because the Labor party is too incompetent to come up with their own ideas.

    • Kevin says:

      08:18pm | 08/03/10

      Persephone
      - the only reason Malcolm Turnbull is for an ETS is so that his Merchant Banker mates can clip the ticket on the so-called carbon credits.
      Rudd - I don’t know, but given his ineptitude on many other matters, it is probably because he can’t think of any other idea to reclaim from the taxpayer the millions he has wasted on his stupid “stimulus packages”.
      AGW is rubbish anyway- haven’t you heard of climategate?

    • John A Neve says:

      07:12am | 06/03/10

      This article reminds me of an old TV series, titled if memory serves me,
      “Those sick old men who govern us”.
      The series was about world leaders through the ages who were sick, really sick, but still held office!!!

      Based on governments decision over the last few years, Iraq, Afghanistan,
      public asset sales etc.  We’ve had our share of sickies.

    • acker says:

      07:37am | 06/03/10

      Might help if Kevin simplified his message a bit. Perhaps hire a straight talking message coach, John Singleton would be ideal for that roll or perhaps even Rove McMannus.

    • Matt says:

      10:31am | 08/03/10

      So he can set new records for how many times someone can fit “fair shake of the sauce bottle” into one speech?

    • preciouspress says:

      08:15am | 06/03/10

      Pembo, get real. Rudd outclasses Abbott in every category bar rudeness. Intellect, common sense, mastery of all policy briefs, avoidance of clangers and above all class itself. Abbott, his shadow ministry and their pet dogs in the media constantly cast personal aspersions on Rudd’s honesty and integrity. Rudd on the other hand hardly if ever makes derogatory personal remarks about his opponents.
      The political journos are desperate for a close contest but let them not imagine that we have one.

    • acker says:

      02:44pm | 06/03/10

      I hate to say it, but Kevin Rudd is starting to remind me of Billy McMahon.
      That is honestly preciouspress, neither Rudd or Abbott are brain surgeons, I think we can safely assume that they may have marginally more intelligence than the average punter like you or I, but as you assert in your critique, it basically comes down to common sense and knowing when to back yourself and seize the opportunity. I fear Rudd has become so ultra defensive, and that good opportunities for the good of the national interest, are starting to pass him by.

    • Max Power says:

      05:38pm | 06/03/10

      Rudd is all class. Abusing the RAF attendent fo failing to bring his special meal that his taff didn’t order, pure class. Abusing 5 colleagues including 3 females for daring to question him, pure class. Trying to hijack Anzac day for political gain on sunrise, pure class. Lying about his childhood, pure class. Blowing up over a hair dryer, pure class. Getting wasted in a strip club and being evicted, then apologising to his wife immediately after the incident, then claiming to the media he couldn’t remember anything, pure class.  Yep, Rudd is pure class.

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      05:32pm | 07/03/10

      Chum you have to stop smoking that stuff, Little Kevvy is a multimillionaire dilettante who speaks Chinese & worked as a low level diplomat & has the distinction of screwing over QLD state public service. on the other hand Tony Abbott has several degrees (he was a Rhodes scholar) including one from Oxford.

    • Bruce says:

      08:42am | 06/03/10

      He is a fit and healthy PM, he will cope. This is a beat-up, if John Howard could do it, Kev, will have no problem.

    • Marvin H says:

      10:12am | 06/03/10

      exactly, and John Howard was and is an old man

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      08:54am | 06/03/10

      David , your observations of our hyperactive Prime Minister are right on the
      money. He is a disastrous train wreck in the making. In recent interviews
      on his state hospitals proposals , he faced prickly , searching questions from seasoned journos.  On two occasions , he was close to erupting in a tirade of frustration & anger. Eventually , the explosion will come and we
      may see the disintegration of a man in the throes of a nervous breakdown.

    • persephone says:

      09:28am | 06/03/10

      Or, to word it another way….

      The contest is now between a guy who dedicates his life to his country surrounded by staff and MPs who are constantly listening to their electorate and working to improve v a guy who just turns up when it suits him, can’t deal with setbacks and is surrounded by staff and MPs who don’t bother listening to others because they think they know it all.

    • luke09 says:

      11:43am | 06/03/10

      persephone, I didn’t think you could write anything bad about Kevin Rudd, sorry for mistaking you. Good to see you’re not labor biased. wink

    • Frankie V. says:

      01:41pm | 06/03/10

      Unfortunately, Kevin’s country is the People’s Republic of China, and the electorate some of his staff and MPs are constantly listening to is the Central Politburo.

    • Cuppa says:

      03:49pm | 06/03/10

      Dedicates his life to his country..?Gee, he has achieved exactly sweet f*ck all in the time he has been ‘dedicating his life to his country’...(oops my mistake, he managed to write a childrens book.)

    • Max power says:

      05:42pm | 06/03/10

      “a guy who just turns up when it suits him, can’t deal with setbacks and is surrounded by staff and MPs who don’t bother listening to others because they think they know it all.”

      Couldn’t have described Rudd better myself, very well put. 
      A good example is the internet censor. The majority of people don’t want it, but Rudd and his minister for censoring and propaganda are pushing on anyway.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      05:53pm | 06/03/10

      persephone , the problem is that he has NOT listened at all. The foil batt fiasco proves that as fact. Sure he is surrounded by staff & M.P’s ,
      the staff are TRYING to tell him what he needs to know & the M.P’s are
      screaming at him to LISTEN to his staff.
                        Your idol , persephone, is destined for disaster real soon.
      The sooner the better. Tony sure has rattled his cage . !

    • persephone says:

      06:51pm | 06/03/10

      I noticed you all correctly identified who I meant as the guy who dedicates his life to his country - no one even pretended to misunderstand me and suggest it was Abbott!

    • Kevin says:

      07:15am | 08/03/10

      Given your obvious bias, Persephone, one would have to be a fool not to know who you meant. As to whether this is true, that is another story. BTW, when did KRUDD get time to write that children’s book, seeing he was so “dedicated to his country”.

    • persephone says:

      08:28am | 08/03/10

      The answer is that he didn’t - it was co authored.

      Nice to see all you guys so ably defending young Tony’s honour. Not even a hint that perhaps I’m being unfair in my description of him.

      Oh, and he had time to write a book to, but admittedly it was while he was in his room, sulking about his salary cut (which seemed to hurt him far, far more than just losing the election).

    • Harquebus says:

      09:51am | 06/03/10

      Religion screwed Rudd’s brain long before fatigue set in.

    • Seano says:

      12:16pm | 06/03/10

      Of course Abbott is the model of sanity when it comes to religion…

    • persephone says:

      12:39pm | 06/03/10

      Unlike the ‘Mad Monk”?

    • Robert Smissen of Rural SA says:

      05:43pm | 07/03/10

      Seano Little Kevvy was a Roman Catholic (just like Mr. Abbott) but got a special deal from the proddies

    • Norma says:

      09:56am | 06/03/10

      Anyone care to estimate how many hours per day Rudd spends planning and implementing media strategies? He could find more hours to sleep if he cut back in this area.

    • Joe says:

      09:58am | 06/03/10

      Plus Abbott has something driving him that Rudd doesn’t. Rudd believes in nothing and is poll and power driven, where as Abbott had the fire of conviction in his belly.

    • Seano says:

      12:17pm | 06/03/10

      Bwhahahahahahahaha….Mary McKillop move over Tony wants your job too aparently…

    • persephone says:

      12:39pm | 06/03/10

      Which is why he self identified himself as ‘a bit of a weathervane’.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      03:56pm | 06/03/10

      Joe, that fire in the belly that you refer to is nothing more than flatulence.

    • Carl Palmer says:

      10:21am | 06/03/10

      Just imagine what the place would be like if he had 8 hours of sleep per night.
      Yep, a much better place.

    • thatmosis says:

      10:44am | 06/03/10

      The real problem is that he uses Labor produced batteries and from experience we all know that they dont deliver. Cant wait to see the overload and resulting eruption should be about 8 on the Richter scale and the fallout will be devastating for all his loyal sheeple. A Tsunami that will carry away all vestige of this party and the clowns that inhabit it.

    • Radical Chick says:

      11:16am | 06/03/10

      The contest is between a leader ( Tony) and a bureaucrat with no convictions and no ideas ( Krudd).
      It is not how much you work. It is indeed how well you work.
      Krudd results are really bad.
      Tony will win!

    • Aitch B says:

      11:20am | 06/03/10

      @preciouspress

      Read before you post, mate. “Rudd outclasses Abbott in every category bar rudeness. Intellect, common sense, mastery of all policy briefs, avoidance of clangers and above all class itself.”

      The use of “bar’ means “except” so what you have said is that Abbott wins in the categories you mention. I’m sure as a rusted on Laborite you couldn’t possibly have meant that! Oh the horror…....

      @persephone

      My…. what a picture you paint. You forgot to mention Rudd’s dedication to his ego and the power trip he’s on.

    • Public Record says:

      12:00pm | 06/03/10

      I’ve been reading The Punch and posting a bit for some months. It has been quite interesting, and has helped me make up my mind as I researched a number of big issues, given The Punch patent shallow treatment plus quite unwise, misleading conservative ra-ra ranting in reply.

      The Punch is in desperate need of quality authors writing quality articles on hot topics, based on well documented fact. The Punch also needs to enforce its own moderation rules and standards, consistently and vigorously.

      And it needs more posters like Persephone, who are prepared to do the hard work and keep their heads in posting good material, when Punch authors and partisan posters can’t be bothered.

      So, after some months here I can now fairly judge the worth of Liberal policies and their supporters. I can fairly judge that minor Parties are a positive menace to the proper progress of sound policy, and I’m not just talking about Senator Fielding.

      It’s thanks to The Punch, then, and its standard of hot topic articles, by staffers or Liberal politicians, plus the standard of Liberal supporter replies, that come the next election I’ve decided it’s time to abandon the minor parties as posturing eunuchs.

      As for the Liberal Party and its supporters, you’ve shown us exactly what you stand for. Grateful.  Enjoy your tax-cuts, low inflation, low unemployment, and below average interest rates. 

      Taken all in all,  The Punch and the regular posters have led me to this view: at this election, the only fair and reasonable course is to vote for a government of potential so far only partly realised. Labor.

      That’s all from me. I’ve seen enough. Things to do. Bye.

    • LukeD says:

      06:30pm | 06/03/10

      For the last 3 years there has been blanket coverage of how hopeless the Liberal Party and their Leaders have been. All we have heard until now in the media (and The Punch) is how Rudd is the most popular PM in Australia’s history and headlines about his catostrophic poll results. You only have to go back on the Punch and have a look before Abbott was Leader and there you will find how authors and commentators/posters pulled the Libs to pieces day after day for years. Now for the first time we are seeing Abbott turn that around slowly but surely. It was until only recently (December) that Rudd had a negative article written about him. Fairs fair I say. Bye.

    • BobM says:

      08:36pm | 06/03/10

      @Public Record

      “And it needs more posters like Persephone, who are prepared to do the hard work and keep their heads in posting good material, when Punch authors and partisan posters can’t be bothered.”

      I can ‘fairly judge’ that both you and persephone are total tossers - and it didn’t take me ‘some months’ to work that one out.

    • Ryan says:

      09:11pm | 06/03/10

      When have you ever posted anything constructive or even close to the reality, you are so Labor rah rah that most of us have reached a conclusion that you are nothing more than a Labor stooge planted here to do nothing more than spread Commie Kev’s propoganda.
      The most offensive comment you made recently really puts the cherry on the cake. You think its ok to make fun of what our voulenteer surf lifesavers wear, the people who spend their weekends out there saving lives and you think it ok to make fun of them, nothing but low class filth and good riddence if by some small miracle we don’t hear from you again, however I fear that unless you have lost your job as a Labor stooge, we will see your innane drivel all too soon.

    • persephone says:

      06:33am | 07/03/10

      Very constructive comment, Ryan.

      Great to see you leading by example.

    • Bluey says:

      05:01pm | 08/03/10

      Public Record, always good to read ya stuff. Sorry to hear ya pulling the plug. And good on ya for picking Labor in the end, mate!

    • Julia says:

      12:23pm | 06/03/10

      A friend of mine said it nicely once when her father told her she was becoming a workaholic.

      If you put your hand in bucket and swirl it around and around, you create a whirlpool and it looks like you’re having an impact.

      But if you take your hand out of the bucket, what happens?

      This is a metaphor for the Krudd Government. Lots of action, not much of it any use.

    • stephen says:

      02:55am | 07/03/10

      I think your friend’s dad’s fallen into the bucket, cause my head’s spinning : that’s not metaphor, but paradox.

    • BTS says:

      01:56pm | 06/03/10

      ‘flagellation’...Punch’s word of the month!

      Let’s see how many more articles we can jam it into before the end of the month.

    • Ricky says:

      03:56pm | 06/03/10

      It wouldnt matter how much sleep old ‘gunna’ got.He would still be completely useless.In 4 years he has managed to achieve exactly nothing besides throw us in debt & make Australia the laughing stock of the world.

    • persephone says:

      06:55pm | 06/03/10

      Well, apparently he’s miraculously turned 2 years in power into 4.

      By anyone’s standards, that’s good time management.

    • Michelle says:

      04:39pm | 06/03/10

      In addition to sleep deprivation, if Rudd has a conscience he should be suffering from “spin fatigue”. The public has been kept in the dark regarding the depth of change that Rudd-Labor wants for Australia - a depth hinted at when he announced his Asia Pacific Union: “In the 1950s, sceptics saw European integration as unrealistic. But most people would now agree that the goal of the visionaries in Europe… has been achieved. It is that spirit we need to capture in our hemisphere. Our special challenge is that we face a region with greater diversity ... But that should not stop us from thinking big ... “

      An EU-style union? Does that mean the free movement of people across our borders? Yep, sure does. So how big is Rudd thinking? Joel Butler explains: “Using the very crude equivalent measure of Poles moving to the UK after its accession to the EU with these figures, an EU-type organisation that included Australia and these three Asian countries (leaving aside all the other proposed members) would see a migration to Australia of about 21.256 million people”.
      http://onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=7488

      You heard that right: 20 million Asians headed this way. That’s why Rudd welcomed the population forecast of 35 million by 2050: “I actually believe in a big Australia I make no apology for that”. And that’s why: “Senator Evans says Australia’s immigration policy needs to be more responsive to Australia’s skills needs. He’s predicting a ‘great debate’ on the idea of bringing in more unskilled migrants”. That’s why Labor doesn’t care about the comparatively piddly number of boat arrivals. Labor wants open-borders anyway.

      The public still mistakenly views Rudd through the prism of nationalism. He is not a nationalist, he is a globalist who maintains the facade of nationalism. The stimulus package had little to do with Australia, and more to do with shoring up economic interdependence, global group-think, and preventing a slide back to protectionism.

      The move away from nationalism to regionalism to globalism is going on slowly all around us. Even an ABC radio program like “Australia all over” gets rebranded “Macca on a Sunday”. A police crackdown on alcohol violence has to now be co-ordinated with New Zealand because of the cult of regional group-think. The move is all around if you have eyes to see.

      Rudd ramped up immigration to record levels after he won the election. But he never mentions these things to the Australian public. In the spirit of the undemocratic EU bureaucratic dictatorship, Rudd hides his true globalist intent and betrayal of Australia. That ought to way on his conscience, if he has one. They say a conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. Maybe Rudd the globalist ideologue is feeling a little mugged right now. Let’s hope so, but I doubt it.

    • Mije says:

      04:40pm | 06/03/10

      Rudd is like a mouse on a spinning wheel. Running around and around and getting nowhere. There are numerous people in public (and private) life that have accomplished significantly more than what Rudd has, without all the dramas, spin and hissy fits. The only difference is, is that that Rudd has an army of spinners who always publicize how hard he works. Give me a break, when is the last time I saw a public servant overworked (and didn’t tell the world about it).

    • Louisa says:

      06:36pm | 06/03/10

      Ah, come on Miji smile

      How often do we see this drop kick roll up his sleeves and pretend to work.  I noticed that baldy also stated recently that he had rolled up his sleeves….. so was working on the latest problem.

      One TERM please

    • Matt Dee says:

      05:22pm | 06/03/10

      I certainly hope you’re right David, and I certainly hope this Government only serves one term, Australia can’t afford a Labor government.

    • DocSniper says:

      06:44pm | 06/03/10

      And we can not afford to have the same circle of, whether Labor,National,Libs,Greens, Ect.
      What is needed is a whole New political body.
      With a all new Family law act, a all new policy for human rights and equality .
      For the farmers to have a fair break to produce, They are the back bone to this country.
      This country was once lucky, Until Howard placed his foot into parliament and it lead to the Rudd factor.

    • DocSniper says:

      05:43pm | 06/03/10

      I think Mr K Rudd Mp, is going to get more of the same and some.
      A issue most media will not brother to even place a glance at, Will surface like a tsunami and flash out the corruption and abuse that he has conceal to deliver the promises he made. More so the lie of saying sorry to the abused children and families.
      Rudd quoted ” the buck stops here “, and so to, It will.

    • OhBugga says:

      09:20am | 07/03/10

      Your talking of Lies? how about children overboard, or the Iraq war? We were lied to on many occassions when Liberals were in Governement. Tony Abbott as Health Minister ripped 1 billion dollars out of the health sytem and we should believe him with his 2 states plan? Or how about the then Aged Care Health Minister Bronwyn Bishop who was in a scandle involving Melbourne’s Riverside Nursing Home, after more than 50 elderly residents were bathed in kerosene. That’s real good Health Policy.

    • WEENY says:

      05:56pm | 06/03/10

      I say vote him out.  Then he can get as much rest as he needs and Australia can start to improve and move ahead.

    • BigBob says:

      09:13am | 07/03/10

      You can say what you like mate but will anyone listen to you? People vote for who they want in Governement. Each person has different reasons for voting. We are individuals not sheep

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:00pm | 06/03/10

      Watching federal politics is like watching a rerun of “Dumb and Dumber” over and over again. Labor’s crap policies versus Liberal’s crap policies.
      However here’s some free advice:
      1. Simple legislation is preferable to complex legislation. Less oversight is needed, less loopholes, less administration costs.
      2. Audit, audit, audit. Always work from the assumption that everyone is trying rort or game the system whether it is Joe Q Citizen, big business, the unions or whatever. (yeah we know that you politicians are rorting the system as well but there’s nothing we can do about that) The Auditor General and the Australian Tax Office should have the power of God or at least absolutely huge budget. Feel free to severely punish any infractions to make the rest of us think twice (of course you can and do legalise some rorts but I don’t recommend it as good practice).
      3. You don’t have to reinvent the wheel. Feel free to swipe any good policies or legislation from political parties or foreign governments. Good legislation is good legislation regardless of the source. Only idiots push a piece of legislation because of ideology or it is their personal creation etc.
      4. Manage the treasury as if it was your own. This doesn’t mean that you have to be a miser but you do have to be thinking about value for money. Sure you can buy votes with pork barrelling and middle class welfare but it’s not good policy and besides the opposition can always outbid you in the end.
      5. Doing something is better than doing nothing as long as it isn’t in haste. Hasty legislation is ill considered legislation which is bad legislation which is worse than doing nothing. Neither is this an excuse to procrastinate. Either do it within a term of government or don’t do it at all.
      6. Don’t be afraid to do the hard decisions. The voter is more intelligent and understanding than you think.

    • Max Power says:

      05:45pm | 07/03/10

      persephone says:07:08am | 07/03/10

      Shane from Melbourne

      1. Yep. We’ve seen what happens when you let business just get on with it. They ignore regulations and common sense and put their workers in harm’s way so they can make money more quickly.

      Yep and we have seen what happens when the Labor Govt just gets on with it. They ignore safety reports, ignore unions and industry heads, they ignore regulations and common sense, ignore the report by minter and ellison and put workers in harms way, just so they can be seen to be doing something in order to get re-elected.

    • persephone says:

      08:31am | 08/03/10

      Max

      incorrect. Garrett responded to all safety reports, putting in place guidelines for insulation installation, thus making the industry far safer than it was previously (the number of house fires per insulated house, for example, fell under his scheme); responded to all the complaints and warnings given to him, as acknowledged by those bodies at the time (and conveniently left out of media reports); factored in Minster & Ellison’s findings into the guidelines for the scheme, in accordance with normal Departmental practice; and gave strict instructions about working conditions, which were ignored by employers and the (non unionised) workforce.

      And it was to provide jobs to help get us through the GFC, as well as having the nice side effect of lowering people’s power usage.

    • Max Power says:

      09:59am | 08/03/10

      persephone says:09:31am | 08/03/10

      Max

      incorrect. Garrett responded to all safety reports, putting in place guidelines for insulation installation, thus making the industry far safer than it was previously (the number of house fires per insulated house, for example, fell under his scheme); responded to all the complaints and warnings given to him, as acknowledged by those bodies at the time (and conveniently left out of media reports); factored in Minster & Ellison’s findings into the guidelines for the scheme, in accordance with normal Departmental practice; and gave strict instructions about working conditions, which were ignored by employers and the (non unionised) workforce.

      How could have possibly responded to all safety reports. He took four months to act on a number of safety reports and didn’t even read the report by minter and ellison until a month ago, even though it had been sitting in his department for months prior.  Both he and Rudd admitted they hadn’t read the report in parliament.  So how could Garrett and Rudd factor in a report they hadn’t read, unless of course you are suggesting they lied to parliament. Had Garrett read the reports and acted on them when they were handed to his department, we wouldn’t have had the four deaths. Sugar coat it all you like, Rudd and Garrett failed to apply due diligence in order to “just get on with it.”  Lindsay Tanner has stated that they haven’t had time to dot the I’s and cross the T’s in a certain project, because the Labor party are more interested in “just getting on with it.” Then we have the broken promise of no worker will be worse off under Labor’s new IR legislation, but there are, all because Labor wanted to “get on with it.” 
      So we have seen what happens when Labor “just get on with it” half baked schemes and broken promises.

    • persephone says:

      06:08am | 07/03/10

      Shane from Melbourne

      1. Yep. We’ve seen what happens when you let business just get on with it. They ignore regulations and common sense and put their workers in harm’s way so they can make money more quickly.

      It’s OK, though, because the Liberal party then turns around and says it’s the government’s fault for not putting in more red tape.

      In my experience, if you have a simple solution to a problem, it won’t work. Life is more complex than that.

      2. Er, whatty? Doesn’t that contradict your ‘less administration costs’ and ‘less oversight’ mantra? What are they auditting, if businesses are keeping less records? How do these audits get paid for, except by a rise in administration costs?

      3. Agreed. Good ideas are good ideas, and should be acknolwedged by both sides. I well remember Howard taking ideas from both Beazley and Latham.

      4. Yep.

      5. Yes to the first bit, but there are some things which do need time to reflect on and to implement. We also need to re develop a culture of long term thinking in both governments and the electorate, and make both politicians and voters understand that sometimes it is better to spend time thinking and discussing something than rushing it through.

      And that not everything can be delivered within a set timeframe.

      6. Well, if they fell for pork barrelling and middle class welfare, I’m not sure that’s true. It’s my own personal opinion that they are (more intelligent than they are generally treated) but again, you seem to be contradicting yourself.

      I do have to say it’s one of the things I like about Rudd (and most posters here will be surprised to hear that I haven’t warmed to him personally, at best a vague affection - it wouldn’t kill me if Julia took over) is that he likes to educate his audience.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      04:40pm | 07/03/10

      With regards to points 1 and 2, I was thinking of the tax regulation as a particular example of a hideously complex piece of legislation with many loopholes, exemptions, differing cases etc. Simplified it would make compliance easier with less paperwork thus actually lowering auditing costs. Complex legislation equals more chance to rort the system.
      With regards to points 4 and 6 there is no contradiction at all. Ultimately middle class welfare and pork barrelling is detrimental to the long term health of Australia. The australian public are generally intelligent enough to understand that, but they have no choice but to demand it of their political masters to cope with rising costs such as housing, food, petrol, child care, plasma tv’s etc. Yeah sure your addiction may be bad for you in the long run but you need your hit now.
      I do agree with you with the need for long term (5 years, 10 years, 20 years) planning but with a 3 year election cycle makes it very difficult.

    • persephone says:

      08:39am | 08/03/10

      Shane

      Although I agree with you on many points, I would point out that most legislation starts out simply. It then becomes complicated in an effort to block all the loopholes - not the other way around.

      I agree about middle class welfare and pork barrelling.

      The middle class have the ‘choice’ of cutting their cloth to suit. If they can’t afford plasma tellies then they shouldn’t be buying them. I think we’re actually in agreement here, but it’s not a lack of intelligence in operation, just pure greed.

      You can’t say Treasury should treat money as if it was their own and then point out that we treat our own profligately without being accused of contradiction! I know what you’re trying to say, however, and am in fundamental agreement.

    • DG says:

      09:56am | 08/03/10

      persephone.

      “I would point out that most legislation starts out simply. It then becomes complicated in an effort to block all the loopholes”

      Not true. It’s very easy to prohibit behaviour. The difficulty arises when you create various different cases. So this rules applies to this person in this situation, is infinitely more complex than “This is the rule of all people”.

      Of course, if the same rule applies universally small business complains that it is too onerous, the public complain that it’s not effective on big business and so on. As such legislation is trying to apply different rules to different people at different times and that is where the complexity some from.

      “All Businesses must provide quarterly reports to The Department in the approved form.” is simple.

      Eventually business A has to report on items 1-5, business B reports on items 1,2 and 5-7, business C reports on 2,5,9-13 and 54 and so on. Every business is going to try to structure it’s affairs in such a manner as to reduce its reporting requirements. If they have no options, there is only one standard there are no holes. Job done.

      Unfortunately, lifeis complex, as such legislation that purports to deal with real life issues must be complex. People will try to get around the laws and limit their own responsibility. The blanket approach is ‘unfair’, the comprehensive approach is subject to exploitation.

    • Eat The Rich says:

      12:17pm | 07/03/10

      Good article David. Perhaps someone should play our back Kevin’s work-life-balance soundbites during the last election campaign and ask him how he has been able to apply them since becoming PM. His mea culpa was interesting (and in my opinion awkward), but it appears as if his response is to “work harder”. There are only so many hours in the day.

    • Brody says:

      05:30pm | 07/03/10

      I don’t think Kev understands which is why he is a failure as a PM. It isn’t about workin’ harder or longer; it is about being efficient and productive. I work less then most people but I get more done because I understand my job. Does Rudd understand his ?

    • Marie says:

      04:33pm | 07/03/10

      I see the apologists are active and doing well with personal opinion on politics. Its all John Howards fault.  No doubt I will have solid agreement on that. Please someone give a spin response. I need a laugh.

    • Jeff says:

      06:33pm | 07/03/10

      Dear Polly and Sherlock
      You’re not about to enter and American election (your question about what Rudd’s done in four years) - 1. Australian Government’s have three year terms and 2. Rudd’s been in Government a little over two years.
      Just a little fact among the opinion and hysteria.

    • Galen says:

      06:37pm | 07/03/10

      OhBugga says:

        10:20am | 07/03/10

        “We were lied to on many occassions when Liberals were in Governement. Tony Abbott as Health Minister ripped 1 billion dollars out of the health sytem “
      That, OhBugga, is a deliberate lie, and I reckon you know it. Recently Tony Abbott was interviewed by Alan Jones:
      You were a Health Minister, federal Health Minister. He said to these young people on national television ‘my predecessor ripped a billion dollars out of the public hospital system’ but, according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, federal government expenditure on public hospitals went from $5.2 billion in ’95-’96 to ten years later $10.7 billion. But he says to these young people my predecessor ripped a billion dollars out of the public hospital system. Is that a lie?
      TONY ABBOTT:
      Well, what happened was that in 1996, long before I was the Health Minister, the forward estimates were reduced by one billion dollars. Now, was the money going to public hospitals ever reduced? No, it was not. But the rate of growth of funding was decreased and that’s why Kevin Rudd keeps repeating this ‘he ripped a billion dollars out of health’. I did not rip a billion dollars out of health. The rate of growth was slowed somewhat but Commonwealth funding for public hospitals has increased year-in year-out and it certainly increased fast while I was the Health Minister.
      You, OhBugga, can claim the honour of being of equal standing with Kevin Rudd, Nicola Roxon, and Mark Arbib when it comes to what may be politely called ‘terminological inexactitudes’ Your apology would be appreciated.

    • elhombre says:

      11:28pm | 07/03/10

      Thanks for that Galen, I’ve been looking for a refutation of that ridiculous ALP lie. I’m also looking forward to little kruddies melt down next time he gets cornered by a bunch of teenagers. It is looking increasingly likely we will be able to limit this corrupt, incompetent government to a single term of damage.

    • Bluey says:

      01:44pm | 09/03/10

      Jeeze! What’s that? Huh?
      “I did not rip a billion dollars out of health”
      “the forward estimates were reduced by one billion dollars”
      ” the rate of growth of funding was decreased “
      Huh? Ya call that straight talk, you Libs, do ya! Jeeze!

      Ya wouldn’t know the truth if it bit ya on the bum.  They took a billion, that’s what he said. Yep, cute, eh - not from that year but from the years after. Pretty cute. They took a billion bucks out of coming health spending. He said it, they did it.

      Bloody Libs, all bloody fancy fibs.  Give us a break.

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      08:00pm | 07/03/10

      The Rudd appologists should have a look at themselves. You have become a joke, don’t be the last to abandon ship.

    • David B says:

      01:54pm | 08/03/10

      You have to admit though, some of these Rudd apologists are showing tremendous loyalty.  A little bit like the Iraqi information minister (bahgdad Bob) telling the media how well the Iraqi troops were performing whilst they were being decimated in the background.    Rudd supporters - you are in serious denial!

    • Peter of Adelaide says:

      04:37pm | 08/03/10

      Ever since the advent of Kevin Rudd most media and Labor have glorified him as being super intelligent and working 24/7.  Now its poor Kevin he is so tired.  I can see no evidence that Rudd has been working hard.  Where is the evidence.  All we see is one Rudd debacle after the other.  His hospital reform proposal look like being his worst debacle so far and can be added to the ETS, and the insulation and asylum seeker debacles and more strikes. 

      The GFC would have been a debacle if the Coalition had not provided the $billions and the sound financial system that saved us from the GFC, not Kevin Rud

    • Milagros says:

      03:18pm | 02/04/10

      Hello there, Happy April Fool’s Day!!

      Three guys were fishing in a lake one day, when an angel appeared in the boat.
      When the three astonished men had settled down enough to speak, the first guy asked the angel humbly, “I’ve suffered from back pain ever since I took shrapnel in the Vietnam War… Could you help me?”
      “Of course,” the angel said, and when he touched the man’s back, the man felt relief for the first time in years.
      The second guy wore very thick glasses and had a hard time reading and driving. He asked if the angel could do anything about his poor eyesight.
      The angel smiled, removed the man’s glasses and tossed them into the lake. When they hit the water, the man’s eyes cleared and he could see everything distinctly.
      When the angel turned to the third guy, the guy put his hands out defensively - “Don’t touch me!” he cried, “I’m on a disability pension.”

      Happy April Fool’s Day!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter