His muscles are permanently flexed, his fashions impeccably zhooshed and his fringe swing puts Justin Bieber’s to shame.

This is freaking me out just a little bit. Picture: AFP

He is Ken doll and he has just celebrated 50 years of hyper – yet exquisitely ambiguous – masculinity.

To mark such a momentous jubilee, this column will now tackle the big questions about Barbie’s tackle-less escort. Big questions such as:

Are Ken and Free Moving Curtis more than just good friends? Is it true his man-bulge was Bobbitt-ed due to budgetary restraints? And why are he and Barbie crucibles for so much cultural anxiety, anyway?

The answers include: we can only hope; ka-ching!; and let’s start at the very beginning.

Ken was born in 1961 which makes him either an elderly Gen X-er or a really sprightly boomer, depending on how you count. (And while we’re on the subject of reductive, ageist tags, it’s worth noting that, at two years his senior, Barbie is a cougar by sensitive Hollywood standards.)

Collectors’ web sites show photos of the Ken prototype sporting snazzy flocked hair, and wearing solid red knit shorts, a striped cloth jacket and cork sandals. There was also a yellow towel in case he wanted to, you know, do manly towel stuff.

In her book Barbie’s Queer Accessories, Erica Rand notes that Mattel created this fantasy boyfriend in an attempt to expand “Barbie’s possibilities toward the infinite” – in other words, to help her get a life beyond consumer items and leisurewear. 

Given that many Christian parents suspected The Big B was a Trojan clotheshorse for lasciviousness, it was critical that Ken’s key attributes include boyishness and asexuality.

The penis issue also posed a serious dilemma.

“If his genitalia were included, some mothers would object,” former Mattel ad man Cy Schneider says in Rand’s book. “[But] if his genitalia were omitted, would he look like some wounded Hemingway hero?”

The solution was to have Ken moulded in a permanent set of jockey shorts with a lump in the appropriate spot, thus giving an approximation of anatomical correctness – the equivalent of Barbie’s smooth, nipple-less boobs. 

Sadly, Ken’s groin suffered a fatal reconceptualisation when Mattel sent the test model to Japan for manufacturing. A supervising engineer decided that eliminating his modesty shorts would make him easier to produce, and that excising his genitals would cut a cent-and-a-half off the cost of production.

Ken was brought into a world a neuter. But, despite Mattel’s initial angst, he didn’t end up causing cataclysmic kinder castration complexes.

“There was a lesson in this for all of us,” Schneider says. “Do not substitute your own tastes, thoughts, or imagination for a child’s.”

While Ken’s boy-next-door lumplessness has remained unchanged over the decades, his fashions, like Barbie’s, have had ADD.

The 1960s and 1970s saw the arrival of wildly attired and resonantly-named editions such Bendable Leg Ken, Live Action Ken, Sun Set Malibu Ken, Busy Talking Ken and Walk Lively Ken.

Also snazzy was Mod Hair Ken from 1973 whose primary selling point was that his appearance could be altered to match his moods. (The catch was that these moods could only revolve around the styling of his rooted hair, and the subtraction or addition of detachable sideburns, moustaches and beards.)

Contemporary versions of the bicep-ed bombshell boast similar girl-on-boy grooming opportunities. Shaving Fun Ken Doll, for instance, invites the over-three-year-old she-demographic to help Ken address his five o’clock shadow before a big date with Barbie.

There’s also Sweet Talking Ken Doll who can record phrases of up to five seconds and speak them back in three pitches.

“He’s the ultimate boyfriend for every occasion,” Mattel gushes of this little number. “Why? Because this handsome Ken doll says whatever you want him to say!”

This vision of boyfriend as malleable, acquiescent ornament raises questions about whether Ken may pose as big a threat to boys’ psyches as his female counterpart supposedly does to girls’.

Barbie, as all good feminists know, is evil because she represents the ideology of the patriarchy and capitalism; teaching girl children they can never be too rich, too thin or too Brazilian-ed.

But Ken hardly epitomises empowerment, either. In many ways, Barbie’s plus-one is just another, chuck-outable accessory. (If he seems steady in his manhood, it’s probably only because he doesn’t have articulated knee joints.)

The complexities of the celebrity vinyl couple have prompted a plethora of obscure academic theses which use the pair as a departure point for deep cultural and neuro-psycho analyses. 

Consider “Why Barbie feels heavier than Ken: The influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the illusory perception of weight”.

In this 2008 article from the journal Cognition, The Netherlands’ Anton J M Dijker pays 82 undergraduate students to estimate the size, strength and weight of a six figures including an Obi-Wan Kenobi doll with a Ken head (aka Old Ken).

He concludes that a size-weight illusion or SWI is demonstrated by the fact that smaller objects tend to feel heavier than larger ones, thus clarifying the nature of embodied, internal sensory-motor representations of physical and social properties.

Phew. Glad we got that one sorted.

In the meantime, the non-neuroscience world is aflame with less complicated news in the form of a rumoured reunion between Ken and his eternally perky she-twin.

Mattel had the pair split in 2004 after 43 years of what many suspected was a marriage of convenience. Now, a company web site is inviting fans to vote on whether or not Barbie should take Ken back.

At barbieandken.com, the Love-o-Meter arrow is currently swinging between “It’s Complicated” and “Give Him a Chance”, while Mattel has also organised for the pair to tweet and Facebook madly on the theme.

The toy giant’s blatant attempt to exploit the powers of social networking and camp-er-nomics is pretty nauseating. But the delighted response of much of the blogosphere suggests the self-consciously cheesy marketing campaign is a hit.

Like nostalgia, postmodern kitsch isn’t what it used to be.

In the meantime, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that our cultural fixation with Ken is a meta version of the sweet-talking design in that what “says” isn’t built-in but something we determine and/or project onto him ourselves.

Rorschach Inkblot Ken may not have quite the same ring as classic tags such as Cool Times Ken from 1988, Stars & Stripes Rendezvous with Destiny Army Ken from 1992, or the gay-tastic Earring Magic Ken from 1993, but it does seem like an apt entry for 2011.

ej@emmajane.info

Most commented

24 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      05:31am | 14/02/11

      “This vision of boyfriend as malleable, acquiescent ornament raises questions about whether Ken may pose as big a threat to boys’ psyches as his female counterpart supposedly does to girls’.”

      Not likely, since most boys don’t play with Barbie dolls. It may, however, affect the perception women have of men. After all, males are the disposable sex, to be exploited and then discarded.

    • Reggie says:

      07:27am | 14/02/11

      At last we get to the bottom of Erich’s hang up To have reached 50 in the same year as Ken, displays the burden of a life-time that no man should have to suffer. Always striving for a Barbie and having to settle for a Le-anne or a Sharon.

      It certainly explains why my Barbara strove so splendidly to be seen as smart ‘cos you had to look through half-closed eyes to see the intrinsic beauty.

      Oh the pain the pain. smile

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:43am | 14/02/11

      haha the Ken Doll is certainly the typical girl’s fantasy template for the modern day. The emasculated chump who’s just there to look hawt and pay for Barbie’s lifestyle but can’t ask for sex or expect anything in return.

      We see the attitude pervade many facets of daily life. From the SATC (the hyper-Baribies) wannabes in every bar, club, food court or restaurant to advertising to our own workplaces.

      I’m not sure if it’s life imitating art or art imitating life. I suspect the latter because I can never accept that we can be molded by consumerist icons. Rather consumerist icons have their genesis in the world around and then become the totems that represent our world.

    • Grumpy says:

      08:47am | 14/02/11

      Alot of guys dispose of women too. Girls just have an easier time of finding losers who are willing to give them everything they want. Its not their fault that guys are willing to pander to them.

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      08:51am | 14/02/11

      If Ken is the fantasy, an obese millionaire who can balance a bucket of hot chips on his belly while reading the Fin Review is the reality.

    • Kika says:

      11:08am | 14/02/11

      Actually EricK most of the boys in my family friend’s played barbies with us when they were young enough not to understand gender differences. In fact one of my friends’s had his own Ken doll so he could play with us too.

      I feel sorry for you EricK. Obviously a woman or some women in your life have treated you badly in the past. On behalf of those women I apologise and want you to know that not all women are nasty and evil. Some women have also been burned just like you by the men in their lives.

      Nothing is ever black and white. There’s often a lot of grey in the middle. It could be arguable that a lot of men see women as exploitable and easily discarded too. I for one was one of those women who was exploited by my ex and burned with lifelong scars from what he put me through. I don’t hold ALL men accountable for what he did to me.

    • Erick says:

      01:11pm | 14/02/11

      Kika, please don’t make assumptions about my personal life. You know nothing about me.

      I have not been burned, beyond the normal bumps and bruises of an ordinary life. My concerns are based entirely on social trends, not personal issues.

      If you have sympathy for starving Africans, that doesn’t necessarily mean you’re hungry yourself. Similarly, if I have sympathy for men who have been victimised by the system, it does not necessarily mean that I myself am one of those victims.

      Cheers!

    • undertow says:

      03:38pm | 14/02/11

      If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck… It’s probably a militant feminist plot to overthrow the supposed archetypal male dominated patriarchal system and not paranoia on Erick’s part.

    • Bec says:

      05:43am | 14/02/11

      Barbie and Ken had way better gimmicks in the 1990s than they do today. Earring Magic Ken was, to a little girl growing up in an uber-bogan regional centre, just about the coolest shit to ever exist. And the one with the tattoos which you could draw on with a pen? Amazing technology 100%. the giant head-and-chest bust of Barbie you could practice putting makeup on? The very height of elegance and refinement, even if she does bear too much resemblance to creepy 1990s sex symbols who washed up far too early in their careers, like the Sanders sisters or Shauna Sand. Things back then just had a sense of glamour that toys of today lack.

      Not that it will drastically change how most kids play with their Barbies and Kens: by banging their moulded-plastic uglies together so they could be ‘sexing’. Skipper can join in too.

    • AJ says:

      09:20am | 14/02/11

      Ken was one of the best things about Toy Story 3!

      Mattel should just embrace the innuendo and have Ken “come out” instead of hooking up with Barbie again. It’s pretty clear that Barbie has an incredibly short attention span given her endless career changes (not to mention the constant plastic surgery), so it’s implausible to think she would be tied to one man for her whole life.

      Barbie may have worked as Ken’s beard for 50 or so years, but in 2011, Ken should be free to embrace another man with a similar interest in fashion and hair-styling and pink convertibles.

    • stephen says:

      11:48am | 14/02/11

      If ken ‘comes out’, Mattel has Rachel Corbett’s permission to use Jason Tin’s Valentines’ Day black and white mural of a ‘rock and a hard place’.

    • Simonious says:

      10:35am | 14/02/11

      Ken has morphed into the modern day Gal Pal.

    • Kika says:

      11:12am | 14/02/11

      Barbie was best in the 80s - she had substance then and slowly deteriorated into rubbishness. I had Barbie & the Rockers Barbie, the African American chick drummer and the Asian guitar babe. They were cool. Then I had Astronaut Barbie, Doctor Barbie and everything in between… then slowly in the 90’s she deteriorated into ‘totally hair’ barbie… and reverted back to being a bimbo.

      Though I must say Barbie today is still WAY better than Bratz!

    • Loulou says:

      11:49am | 14/02/11

      I used to have an MC Hammer Ken when I was a young lass. He came with a boombox that played ‘You Can’t Touch This’ and a sequined purple pair of parachute pants.

      That is all.

    • Bec says:

      01:06pm | 14/02/11

      Wow. I am coveting the hell out of that little treasure…

    • Loulou says:

      01:29pm | 14/02/11

      Oh it was a pearler! I have no idea why my mum bought it, I was only about 5, I had no idea who MC Hammer was, maybe she thought my Barbie collection wasn’t multicultural enough…

    • stephen says:

      11:51am | 14/02/11

      Put him on a rope at let him keep trim the grass on a 4 foot radius from the clothes-line.
      Sportmen should do and not be seen, and ex-sportmen should just fade away.

    • stephen says:

      12:12pm | 14/02/11

      Er, that comment was actually in reference to our man Warnie.

      Hang on, make it both, and warnie, on all fours, and behind our leader, can now get a glimpse of a mouth that’s a little better looking that Liz’s, and doesn’t go on so much.

    • fairsfair says:

      12:54pm | 14/02/11

      Hold up! No mention of Ken’s cousin, the illusive dark haired Derrick. As kids, we had poverty pack barbies and my cousins had it all. The convertible, the camper van, Ken, Derrick, Peaches and Cream Barbie, Barbie and the Rockers. We had a shoe for a car, non-themed Barbies, Grandma crocheted us dresses with matching hats. My brother used to chew their feet so the shoes would not fit. I remember mum affixing them with rubber bands one time. One Christmas mum gave my sister “Ballroom Barbie” and me, “Ballroom Ken”. I was devastated. You couldn’t dress that wowser up and my sister wouldn’t even let me brush Ballroom Barbie’s hair. She then coloured in Ken’s Y-Fronts with a Nikko as she thought he’d look “cool” wearing DTs at the pool party she had around a cereal bowl of water. I was devastated.

      Ken was superfluous. You only wanted him in addition to Barbie and to do things with Barbie - as with all men (sorry Eric!) he came in handy at times wink All other times he was left in the box to fester on his own.

      Mum, I’ll never get over your choice of gifts. You even gave me a Cabbage Patch Doll called Chastity that had a Mullet. What were you thinking?

    • Erick says:

      01:14pm | 14/02/11

      What did I tell you, faithful Punchers? Here a female admits the sexist exploitation of poor Ken! Come see the violence inherent in the system!

      smile

    • fairsfair says:

      01:58pm | 14/02/11

      I feel dirty for it Eric. Don’t judge me. Is there a group I can go to for support and/or admit my failings?

      “My name is fairsfair and I have inherant gender exploitative tendancies. It has been five months since I last bitch slapped a man for just being male”

      I totally get your point though - it is very true and you can see it manifesting itself in teeny tiny children when they play in groups. More so if the gals outnumber the boys. The exclusion is a bit hard to watch. I think social constructions of what is male and female “toys” certainly contributes. All of a sudden you have fully grown woman say (and my friends say this regularly)  “I want a little girl because you can’t dress up a little boy so much”. Yes yes, they love their little boy if they happen to have one, but you can’t deny that playing with dollies contributes to these kinds of statements while pregnant. It is interesting.

    • Erick says:

      02:23pm | 14/02/11

      Let me check if there’s a local chapter of Feminazis Anonymous ...

      But seriously, I think the exclusion goes both ways - and I don’t worry about it too much. I remember when I was about six to ten years old (a long time ago), the boys and girls used to exclude each other quite a bit. Each had their own interests, and little interest in the opposite sex.

      Of course, around puberty time, this changed a lot. Then, at least as far as my experience goes, boys became obsessed with girls.

      This seems a fairly natural state of affairs. There are of course exceptions. But overall, I wouldn’t really worry about it. Kids have lots of silly ideas, and most grow out of them. It’s the adults I worry about.

    • fairsfair says:

      03:31pm | 14/02/11

      from my experience, boys seem to exclude because they are just not interested. Girls seem to exclude to inflict pain and suffering - they also do it to each other though, so perhaps it is not a gender thing. Puberty hits and they are still doing it to each other, but it gets a bit worse - probably because that childhood ability of forgetting about it and moving on after someone cracks out fairy bread disappears. Gaining and keeping the interest of boys at age 14 is more of a competition with other girls I reckon. Gaining and keeping the interest of girls at age 14 is just exactly that for a boy! wink

      I know a lot who haven’t grown out of it, but it is weird - They are not man hating spinsters with several cats. They are the types who can’t be single for five minutes and are so dependent on men and having one it is not funny.

    • Erick says:

      04:40pm | 14/02/11

      Boys can also exclude each other in order to inflict pain and suffering. This is what’s known as bullying.

      But, in my admittedly limited experience, younger boys exclude girls because they’re simply interested in different things. However, after puberty, boys are very much interested in girls - but they might perform some exclusionary acts for the sake of appearances, or competition with other boys.

      Darn, now I’ve forgotten what we were talking about in the first place.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

ping @TheStalwart - Ireland looking at phasing out Apple's tax arrangements http://t.co/fZESvMZJsW

Paul Colgan

Basically, could be the end of the Double Irish http://t.co/fZESvMZJsW

Paul Colgan

REPORT - Ireland set to phase out the tax deals that have saved tech giants billions http://t.co/fZESvMZJsW

Daniel Piotrowski

Great view of the Telstra Tower http://t.co/1e6fgxWJYS

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter