Like Peter denying Jesus after the arrest, as dawn was breaking and the cock was getting ready to crow, Australia is given a third chance to acknowledge its inconvenient associations. Will we, like Peter, deny any association with or responsibility with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the detainees in Guantanamo? We probably will. We denied our own citizens in Guantanamo until the opinion polls started to turn dirty.

In the hood: Uighur supporters in Washington DC

Australia, through the support of the Howard government for the actions of the Bush Administration’s war on terror, has as much responsibility for the Uighurs, who were found to have been wrongly detained, as does the US and the Bush Administration.

We should accept the Uighurs as refugees and permanent residents. If they are returned to China, they face certain persecution and, possibly, death. To do otherwise would display a flaw in our national character.

Meanwhile, the detention of other detainees is also turning out to be baseless, a house of cards built on uninformed suspicions.

On 5 May 2009, Judge Gladys Kessler dealt with the facts concerning the detention of one detainee. Judge Kessler ordered the release of detainee, Alla Ali Bin Ali Ahmed, a citizen of Yemen, who had been detained at Guantanamo since 2002 when he was a mere teenager. (A report and the full judgment can be found here.)

Judge Kessler said the US Government had to prove detention was justified, and that this must be achieved by “a preponderance of the evidence”.

She found many of the documents before her were disputed they contained second and third hand hearsay; a number of the statements were alleged to have been obtained by torture; and none of the statements were actually recorded verbatim. The Federal Rules of Evidence provided, however, that all relevant evidence is admissible. They require that even second or third hand accounts be received and evaluated for credibility.

Judge Kessler said “at this point in this long, drawn-out litigation the Court’s obligation is to make findings of fact which satisfy appropriate and relevant legal standards as to whether the Government has proven by a preponderance of evidence that the Petitioner is justifiably detained”. 

She evaluated the evidence of various witnesses whose identities were kept secret. Most appear to have been past or present Guantanamo detainees. The judge commented adversely on the credibility of the witnesses; the fact that much of the information was imprecise; that versions had been stated, recanted and re-stated; that torture or fear of torture was relevant to the statements relied on; that the question whether the applicant was properly identified as the person identified who was the subject of the dispute was often unclear; and much of the information was, itself, second or third hand hearsay.

Judge Kessler was not satisfied that Ali Ahmed had ever been in Afghanistan. She concluded any contact with others alleged to be Taliban fighters had not been proved to be anything other than incidental.

None of the allegations against the detainee were found to be proved. Judge Kessler said: “When taken all together as facts which comprise a mosaic theory, the evidence does not satisfy the Government’s burden of proof: ie, the Government’s picture does not establish that it is more likely than not that [Mr. Ali Ahmed] fought for the Taliban … “.

As well as granting the writ of habeas corpus, she ordered that “the Government … take all necessary and appropriate diplomatic steps to facilitate [Mr. Ali Ahmed’s] release forthwith, and to report back to the Court no later than June as to the status of [his] release”.

Most commented

13 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • jethro says:

      02:14pm | 01/06/09

      I think that the Haneef lawyer should put them up at his house(s). He obviously cares for them so much, he can look after them.

    • Tracy says:

      02:33pm | 01/06/09

      A tricky one for sure. I have often wondered if people who loudly bleat about accepting refugees in to the country without detention, would actually open the doors to their own houses…it’s all very well to have compassion, but I bet most would be of the NIMBY variety. I also wonder whether the women amonst them would be so welcoming in future decades when women’s rights begin to erode due to cultural differences…and finally…why is it that if I would prefer to maintain the concepts of equality for women and gays, I am considered a racist who is to be pitied for living in “fear”?

    • Derek W. says:

      02:49pm | 01/06/09

      I agree that the Uighers should not be sent back to China. However, it is the fault of the US that they have been detained for over seven years without charges being laid. The US are morally obliged to resettle the Uighers in the US. Guantanamo has been a blight on humanity ever since its inception. The US government set themselves up as guardians of freedom, peace and justice
      and yet have the gall to unjustly lock up and torture people who may very well be innocent. Whatever the outcome I wish the best for the Uighers.

    • Michael says:

      03:01pm | 01/06/09

      Didn’t you hear Tracy? according to Indian media sources Australia is packed full of White racists who roam the streets looking for Indians to bash and rob.

      I think we should help these men with open arms, they were detained in error, they have been released without charge, which is more then we can say for David Hicks. (Im still making up my mind there i’d like to hear both sides)

      But if there coming here means they will be given a chq once a fortnight and forgotten about im against that, they should have plenty of assistance in learning how to live in a new land.

      On the other hand i can not imagine how these men must feel towards the western alliance that wrongly detained them for years, perhaps they would prefer to live somewhere else, New Zealand had no hand in them being detained, maybe an option.

    • eco(australia) says:

      03:11pm | 01/06/09

      Hello World!

      The funniest thing about America’s Auschwitz, if i may call it that, is that it is built on the island of CUBA.  You know, the tension around 1963 with the Bay of Pigs invasion, Fidel Castro & all that!  (Please, no jokes about Swine Flu.)

      I was only thinking this morning about how safe Moslem jails are.  I’ve seen jailees praying towards Mecca !  It would truly be a great thing for Guantanamo inmates to go into Australian, British and of course Yankee jails because they’d teach us Western ill-mannered irreligious hedonist alcoholics & druggies to smarten up.

      Dangerous ??  Maybe.  But surely not more so than the faceless hawks - you know who you are - who, ripping up the Geneva Convention, put the alleged terrorists there in the first place, and also ordered the lobotomizing fear/torture/homicide at Abu Graid.

    • Bunny says:

      03:55pm | 01/06/09

      Why is bringing them to Australia even being considered an option?  They are not our problem.  We already have far too many refugees.

    • Denis Lynch says:

      04:01pm | 01/06/09

      I’m sure our foreign minister has the room for one or two of them, so yes they should definitely be settled in Australia. If any of our federal politicians of either political persuasion has the courage to sponsor one of them then I will do the same.

    • Marilyn says:

      04:13pm | 01/06/09

      If the Uighers are not a threat, why don’t the USA Government settle them in their own Country? We do not need to import more trouble here.

    • Trevor says:

      05:59pm | 01/06/09

      If these people are so innocent why not send them home or straigh to the USA. We have enough people now to feed and water.

    • Richard says:

      08:14pm | 01/06/09

      They’re dead men walking if they’re sent back to China. How about Chairman KRudd showing a little spine and flicking the birdie to the CCP for once in his life.

    • james says:

      09:14am | 02/06/09

      why is it that australia is becoming the dumping ground for other countrys to send the undesirables that they dont want .

      from what i understand is you have been is prison you cannot even visit these countrys yet they want to send criminals here to live

      keep them where they are

    • Sam says:

      09:34am | 02/06/09

      James - these people are not criminals. They have not been found guilty by a military tribunal let alone any civilian court that follows established rules of evidence etc. 
      I’m constantly perplexed by a (seemingly) persuasive belief that any person who is arrested or interviewed by the police is guilty. Do you have any evidence demonstrating the Uighurs’ guilt, James?
      I suspect that America would prefer to have another country take the Uighurs so that America can argue that other countries are dealing with the problem of what to do with the detainees as well (ie - that not just America is settling them - because that appears to be politically unpalatable there).
      My hat goes off to Messrs Keim and Russo.

    • Les says:

      09:57am | 02/06/09

      If these people are found to be innocent then they should be compensated by America and then returned to wherever they had been first detained.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

The Woolwich attack victim's identity has been revealed, http://t.co/1Mw4lxDr1c

Malcolm Farr

Peter Costello was slow to recognise Tony Abbott's economic mastery but his near wholesale adoption of Labor's Budget has swung him at last.

Lucy Kippist

Why is the Big Bang Theory so popular? Totally agree with all these points, @SamClenchhttp://t.co/WmvwWgb9q6

Lucy Kippist

Shots fired at a coal seam gas protest in Tara, Qld this morning, http://t.co/bQpLhosjbh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter