The world lost one of its great grumps this week, Robert Hughes, dead at 74. Hughes was the best writer Australia has ever produced.

Bill Leak's portrait of Hughes, painted after his near-fatal car accident near Broome in 1999. Source: National Portrait Gallery

He wrote prolifically and broadly. He also wrote with guts and emotion. His epic recreation of our convict history, The Fatal Shore, stands as a truly horrifying account of the brutal origins of modern Australia. In his works on the city of Barcelona and his many books on art Hughes wrote with joy about all the possibilities of human creativity. In one of his best but lesser-known books, The Culture of Complaint, he wrote with scorn and disgust about one of the most pressing issues of the modern day.

Our tolerance for stupidity, our ambivalence towards the fact that the human species appears to be getting not smarter but dumber; most of all, our determination to permit laziness and avoid rigour, because the greatest sin you can commit in the modern age is to hurt anybody’s feelings.

This fiery essay was aimed specifically at popular culture and high school and university education in the United States, but its arguments apply across the western world. It was written in 1993 and, depressingly, rings truer with the passage of time. It includes one of the best sentences I have ever read:

“The self is now the sacred cow of American culture, self- esteem is sacrosanct, and so we labour to turn arts education into a system in which no one can fail. In the same spirit, tennis could be shorn of its elitist overtones: you just get rid of the net.”

Almost 20 years after Hughes wrote this line, in countries such as Australia you are more likely to become a household name if you have cooked the winning dish on MasterChef or sung the best song on The Voice than if you have written a great book or made a scientific discovery. One of the first acts of Campbell Newman’s premiership in Queensland was to axe the state’s literary awards, a deliberate button-pushing exercise aimed at reassuring rednecks that he wasn’t going to waste much-needed public dough on what hillbillies in the Carolinas call fancy book learnin’.

Our schools are strait-jacketed by the consensus that every kid has to be a winner, or at least treated as such, even if they are plagued by profound problems with their reading and writing. As a parent, the last thing you will find on a school report card is a blunt letter F for “fail”, a benchmark deemed too harsh in this age of squeamishness and euphemism, even if it means your son won’t be able to fill in the form properly at his job interview 10 years down the track. Instead we talk about performances set against the outcomes of the cohort and go to great pains to use incomprehensible language, lest anyone be presented with an upsettingly accurate picture of what is really going on.

One of the best examples of the lily-livered mindset so beautifully skewered by Robert Hughes comes from my home state of South Australia. On the day Hughes died I was listening to a debate on the radio about the South Australian Certificate of Education, one of the biggest white flags every raised by education bureaucrats in the fight for standards in schools.

South Australia is now the only state where in their final year students can do just four subjects, as well as a flimsy research project. Scandalously, English need not be one of the subjects undertaken in their final year. In this country where so many still struggle to meet required standards of literacy, we are sending kids into the world with the misleading reassurance that it’s not really that important anyway.

I have a couple of friends who are high school teachers in SA. They regard the SACE certificate as entirely vacuous and say that it makes them feel more like baby-sitters than educators. Indeed the store which the Education Department places on retention rates seems to confirm that schools are regarded more as a venue for child-minding rather than learning through discipline and repetition, regular homework, and robust but nurturing feedback.

It also reflects the defeatist policy response to sustained failure, which is to make it easier for people to pass a school curriculum or a university degree by simply lowering the standards.

If there is such a thing as required reading any more – and there isn’t – Hughes’ brilliant book should be placed on the desk of everyone who believes that tennis is best played without a net, and that feeling good about yourself is more important than knowing things.

Most commented

87 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Bertrand says:

      06:39am | 10/08/12

      Sounds like my type of guy.

      Plenty of people I know tell me I’m a grump. It mostly stems from the fact I can’t stand stupidity, ignorance, vacuousness, narcissism or shallowness.

      These tend to be almost celebrated in our culture. It’s hard not to be grumpy.

      Don’t get me started on our education system. Some of the things I have heard from teacher friends regarding new policies on assessment and student failure (or the near inability for this to even occur) leave me shaking my head in disgust.

    • Colin says:

      08:08am | 10/08/12

      @ Bertrand 06:39am | 10/08/12
      “Plenty of people I know tell me I’m a grump. It mostly stems from the fact I can’t stand stupidity, ignorance, vacuousness, narcissism or shallowness…”

      What about an over-inflated sense of self-importance, rampant self-aggrandisement, an over-blown ego, and a penchant for believing that you are better than everyone else..?

      You don’t seem to suffer with a loathing of those equally abhorrent traits.

    • Bertrand says:

      08:56am | 10/08/12

      I don’t think I’m better than everyone else but I do think too much of our culture is a celebration of the mediocre.

      It makes me grumpy that teachers are instructed not to fail students even if they don’t submit any work. It makes me grumpy that the idea that an unreasoned opinion should be judged as of equal relevance or worth as the learned findings of professionals. It makes me grumpy that teenagers can recognise Kim Kardashian but not a former PM. I dislike the idea that near enough is good enough and that shades of grey are more important than standing out as exceptional.

      Our culture is increasingly vacuous and inward looking, where the cult of the self has triumphed. I’m not sorry that I value knowledge over ignorance, intelligence over stupidity, self discipline over self worship, altruism over narcissism.

    • Bertrand says:

      08:57am | 10/08/12

      I don’t think I’m better than everyone else but I do think too much of our culture is a celebration of the mediocre.

      It makes me grumpy that teachers are instructed not to fail students even if they don’t submit any work. It makes me grumpy that the idea that an unreasoned opinion should be judged as of equal relevance or worth as the learned findings of professionals. It makes me grumpy that teenagers can recognise Kim Kardashian but not a former PM. I dislike the idea that near enough is good enough and that shades of grey are more important than standing out as exceptional.

      Our culture is increasingly vacuous and inward looking, where the cult of the self has triumphed. I’m not sorry that I value knowledge over ignorance, intelligence over stupidity, self discipline over self worship, altruism over narcissism.

    • Nyani says:

      09:00am | 10/08/12

      No Colin, simply a certain “PRIDE” in knowing positively that one is NOT stupid!

    • Colin says:

      09:52am | 10/08/12

      @Nyani 09:00am | 10/08/12
      “No Colin, simply a certain “PRIDE” in knowing positively that one is NOT stupid!”

      Except, of course, in the understanding of the concept of “Irony” when posting a reply…

      ——————

      @Bertrand 08:56am | 10/08/12

      “I’m not sorry that I value knowledge over ignorance, intelligence over stupidity, self discipline over self worship, altruism over narcissism….”

      Nothing wrong with that, except when we value all those things over intrinsic human rights - no matter how “Stupid” someone may be - and subjugate, estrange, and downgrade the disenfranchised, the poor, and those that require help and nurture rather than spite and ridicule.

    • Dan says:

      10:57am | 10/08/12

      I hate it when people use the word irony without looking it up in a dictionary first.

    • Bertrand says:

      11:57am | 10/08/12

      I think you’re reading a bit too much into my comments Colin.

      Getting grumpy about a show like The Shire celebrating narcissism us not akin to subjugating the disenfranchised. Indeed, my comment that altruism is better than narcissism would suggest I place more value on helping than subjugating.

    • Colin says:

      01:37pm | 10/08/12

      @Bertrand says: 11:57am | 10/08/12
      ‘’‘... my comment that altruism is better than narcissism…”

      Which bolsters my point, Bernard; if you display all the traits of egoism as I pointed out before, then you are in diametric opposition to altruism.

      Indeed - if we take your initial comments regarding your intolerance of people who are - according to your very subjective bent on the subject -  “stupid” and the “ignorant”, then you actually display the smug, egocentric traits of narcissism yourself..!

    • Martin says:

      02:59pm | 10/08/12

      @Bertrand

      I’m feeling an overwhelming burst of man-love (even though I’m proudly heterosexual) for you, Betrand.

      Care to come over to my place for a beer and steak with me and the missus ? She too is a grumpy old woman with a healthy intolerance for the shallow, stupid and pig-ignorant.

    • Bertrand says:

      03:54pm | 10/08/12

      @Colin : as I said before, I think you are reading more into my comments than is actually there. To say I get grumpy at the idea that an ignorant opinion should be viewed as equivalent to an educated one doesn’t mean I automatically believe I am an expert on everything, simply that I value the opinion of an expert over one of someone who has no idea what they are talking about. For me to say I value intelligence over vacuousness doesn’t mean I think I’m some sort of genius who all should bow down to. It just means I find the cultural worship of vacuous celebrities to be disappointing.

      Valuing effort and achievement, goals and ambition, or people who display character and substance shouldn’t be automatically equated with narcissism.

    • Brian says:

      02:47pm | 11/08/12

      And I hate it, Dan, when people assume irony has only one definition. It was a moderately arguable case of Socratic irony, at the least. Pity it hit the wrong target.

    • Audra Blue says:

      07:15pm | 11/08/12

      I’m with you Bertrand.  I’m finding it hard to be optimistic about anything in our culture these days when all the masses worship is vacuousness, shallowness and bullshit.

      I was watching Season 2 of Grumpy Old Women and all I kept saying was, “I agree!”

      My 21 yo son was amazed that it wasn’t just me feeling that way.  But all is not lost though, he thinks a lot of the same things.

      There is hope for the future after all.

    • Toady says:

      06:59am | 10/08/12

      So anyone who doesn’t support governments wasting dollars to prop up the indulgences of a few who choose to write for a living is branded a redneck.  Nice one.  In the real world (trades, professional services), if you do something that others deem to be of value, people pay you for it.  Lucky for our arty types that they needn’t produce something valued by others, because the government will prop them up financially.

      I do agree with the rest of the article - we have developed into a weak, dumb, self-indulgent society, where few try their best or take risks because mediocrity and laziness is just fine, thank you very much.

    • Hambone says:

      08:15am | 10/08/12

      You could say the exact same thing about our olympians Toady. How many government dollars are used to support the few who choose to hurl, chase and run after things that really produce nothing of value?

      As for society, I think watching Idiocracy explains a lot about where we are headed.

    • Expat Ozzie says:

      09:38am | 10/08/12

      Toady: It would be a very boring world without those that can produce things of beauty. It’s often said artists are poor when they are alive and there work doesn’t gain it’s true value until they pass away. I for one am happy there are people with the guts to do what they really want and produce wonderful things for me to look at, read or watch.

      As for the lazy culture of Australia I fully concur. I’ve travelled extensively and live overseas and I am saddened by the whining, self interested culture that has developed in my country.

    • M says:

      10:24am | 10/08/12

      No wonder we’re regarded as a cultural wasteland.

    • Toady says:

      11:07am | 10/08/12

      Expat, I agree almost completely.  But the question is whether artists and novelists should receive most of their funding through government grants.  They chose their profession, just as plumbers, architects doctors, lawyers, etc. do.

      M, not sure we are regarded as a cultural wasteland as you claim.  Nice of you to sling the insult my way, but if that’s the best you can do, it is even more proof of the laziness of Australians. We’re more widely regarded as the rent-seeking, welfare hunting, entitlement haven, where staying dumb is rewarded by Centrelink.

    • amy says:

      11:29am | 10/08/12

      I really wish peopel woudl stop putting a value on what is “real” and what isnt..its ALL real..this isnt the matrix (as far as we know)

    • Dan says:

      11:56am | 10/08/12

      thats what they want you to think Amy

    • Expat Ozzie says:

      12:12pm | 10/08/12

      Toady: I have a problem with this mentality that has crept into our culture that something is only worth supporting if it makes money. Take for instance mathematics. This is arguably one of the mentally toughest fields to do well in. Many of the concepts in this field are far beyond the reach us mere mortals. It is not a particularly glamorous field in it’s pure form nor does it pull in money in a immediate tangible form. Yet it underpins most of our society. The very computer you use to post here uses Logic developed over centuries that provided no immediate return in investment. Today the computer systems of the world and as an extension trillions of dollars rely on these discoveries that had no immediate value back in the day.

      Making a judgement on what is worth supporting purely on it’s ability to make an immediate profit is at best short sighted. In answer to your question I say yes they should however, not as a free for all (that’s the tricky bit really). Why? I think one of the governments main roles in society is to support areas of endeavour that are not purely economic but add cultural value to our lives. It would be a very boring grey old world with out such things my friend.

    • amy says:

      12:39pm | 10/08/12

      @Expat Ozzie- its all about getting a job and money….I think somone commented down furher “ita hard to be a smart person” in todays socitey

    • P. Walker says:

      07:00am | 10/08/12

      What an unfortunate name in light of the grub just arrested in London!
      Both in the arts.

    • James1 says:

      10:04am | 10/08/12

      To call a sitcom art stretches the definition a bit too far for my liking.

    • acotrel says:

      07:10am | 10/08/12

      ‘Our tolerance for stupidity, our ambivalence towards the fact that the human species appears to be getting not smarter but dumber; most of all, our determination to permit laziness and avoid rigour, because the greatest sin you can commit in the modern age is to hurt anybody’s feelings’

      A book about Tony Abbott ?

    • Toady says:

      08:02am | 10/08/12

      Please list your educational achievements, acotrel, before making ridiculous comments like that.  I believe Abbott is a highly educated man, unlike many of the highly incompetent mafia (whoops, meant union) lackeys polluting federal Labor at the moment.  Bring on a Royal Commission into suspected criminal activity associated with these people.  Seems if you head up a union and want to become wealthy, just steal union funds - no questions asked.

    • acotrel says:

      08:19am | 10/08/12

      I respect your right to believe in Tony Abbott.
      So you believe he has brought nothing but glory to the Cecil Rhodes Foundation ?
      I suggest if you do a comparison, you will find that both my formal qualifications and experience far exceed those of Tony Abbott in our respective areas of expertise.

    • M says:

      08:20am | 10/08/12

      Being educated is no guarantee against being an idiot.

    • Colin says:

      08:44am | 10/08/12

      @M 08:20am | 10/08/12
      “Being educated is no guarantee against being an idiot.”

      Indeed. I think your comment particularly poignant given the myriad “qualifications” now available. Once a degree (and any subsequent post-graduate qualification) was difficult to achieve and was valued highly. Today I see people with a BA in Flower Arranging (or some other equally nonsensical subject) competing with applicants for jobs that require a university qualification…

      Having said that, I have a postgraduate degree, but many of the people I know who don’t are amongst the most articulate, intelligent, resourceful people I have ever met. Yet i also know a great many “Degree-qualified” buffoons who are as feckless as paperweights…

      No, as you say, “Education” is no guarantee against being an idiot.

    • Toady says:

      08:51am | 10/08/12

      Well, seeing how you have invited the comparison, please list your qualifications.  We’ll see how they stack up against Abbott’s.  I see down below you refer to some valuable studies into subject matter that has served you well in life threatening situations, and in trying to force our opinions on others via blog sites.  Care to list those life threatening situations? Or do they exist in cyber-space and in your imagination?  And the really big question is (and answer truthfully), are you Bob Ellis?

    • M says:

      09:03am | 10/08/12

      @ Colin, I find the most interesting people are those who read.

    • acotrel says:

      09:26am | 10/08/12

      @Toady
      I have no intention of listing my qualifications and experience on this forum.  I certainly won’t say where I worked except that it required a security clearance from the Commonwealth Police. Just accept my word for it - In my area of expertise I am far better qualified than Abbott is in his !

    • Jack Spratt says:

      09:35am | 10/08/12

      That reminds me of the psychiatric patient who, when asked what he saw when asked a very large number of questions on a great range of topics, always immediately saw female body parts.

    • Colin says:

      09:56am | 10/08/12

      @M 09:03am | 10/08/12
      “@ Colin, I find the most interesting people are those who read.”

      indeed. It is a dying ability to ensconce oneself wholeheartedly in a book and be captivated and enthralled…computer games have usurped that position in our psyche by providing the action and not letting our own imagination to the fore, much to our detriment.

    • Steve says:

      10:12am | 10/08/12

      So, acotrel, what qualifications SHOULD Tony Abbott have (in your view) in order to do his job. And please list the ALP politicians who do have those “essential” qualifications.

    • Pedant says:

      10:58am | 10/08/12

      ‘... as feckless as paperweights…’
      Poor use of a simile, Colin, and one I’m sure you are regretful of. However your english is otherwise good, please carry on…

    • Toady says:

      11:22am | 10/08/12

      Acotrel, I assume your high-security-clearance job was in Australia?  That would make them the Federal Police, not Commonwealth Police (unless of course they changed their name somewhere along the way).  But why worry about small details like that when constructing a fantasy!

    • Colin says:

      11:42am | 10/08/12

      @Pedant 10:58am | 10/08/12

      Apt aptronym that…

    • Expat Ozzie says:

      12:23pm | 10/08/12

      Toady: The Federal Police were formed in 1978 as a merger between the Commonwealth Police and the ACT Police. A quick search would have told you that so it is possible that acotrel is telling the truth. I know I still refer to organisations by their old names quite often.

    • Toady says:

      01:22pm | 10/08/12

      Expat, I’m sure acotrel could have answered that.  Sounds like he’s living in the past.  Good old Goofy Whitlam days.

    • acotrel says:

      07:15am | 10/08/12

      ‘It also reflects the defeatist policy response to sustained failure, which is to make it easier for people to pass a school curriculum or a university degree by simply lowering the standards.’

      And in a minute we could be playing with nuclear power and radioactive waste !

    • Al says:

      08:25am | 10/08/12

      Sorry?
      There is only a VERY tenuous link between lowering of education standards and nuclear power (and associated waste).
      That being the worry of underqualified people being engaged to work in that area. Which is not going to happen anytime soon due to the very limited facilities and access to nuclear reactors in Australia.
      So whats your point?

    • acotrel says:

      09:22am | 10/08/12

      The link will not be tenuous if facilities operate under the authority of people with fake or substandard qualifications. As it is, even now we don’t have the high tech industries to cultivate the required skills in our engineers and scientists, and the book teaching approach of our academics are becoming the replacement. The current ‘dumbing down’ is causing a loss of capability - it is a recipe for disaster.

    • CJ Johnson says:

      07:17am | 10/08/12

      Robert Hughes was a wonderful writer, and anybody who has an interest in literature should seek out his books.

      However, he died on the 6th of August, four days ago, and the cynic in me feels like this should have been written several days before now. Because posting the story today feels like a cheap way to capitalise on that OTHER Robert Hughes in the news…

    • iansand says:

      08:04am | 10/08/12

      I put a comment about it into the open thread on that day.  To zero interest or response.

    • Anubis says:

      10:32am | 10/08/12

      @ CJ Johnson - “Robert Hughes was a wonderful writer, and anybody who has an interest in literature “

      The Fatal Shore is a work of fiction. Hughes used a great degree of artistic licence in writing this book. The accounts of brutality are very exaggerated and have been written the way they have in order to appeal to a wider book buying audience. This was a topic of discussion right throughout my undergraduate study years (Australian History)  and when comparing “The Fatal Shore” to the reality of the convict life in Australia you can understand that it is Fiction, exaggerated and expanded in order for maximum sales. In saying that, it is a great read and I would recommend it to anyone with an interest in the early years of Australia, as long as it is read with genuine scepticism regarding the multiple accounts of brutality and tempered by reading some more contemporary sources. Remember - Hughes was an art critic and journalist - not a Historian.

    • simonfromlakemba says:

      11:00am | 10/08/12

      @Anubis

      Hard to find books that give you a real picture. Say Hughes on one hand and Windschuttle on the other.

    • Dan says:

      11:14am | 10/08/12

      Indeed Simon. It is possible to make an argument that all history is subjective and fictional. Its a bit of a buzz kill when you like history.

    • Anubis says:

      11:19am | 10/08/12

      @ SimFL - Sorry I meant to mention original records, Governor letter books etc. Some recent books that are quite accurate are works like “A Cargo of Women” and “Ladies of the Royal Admiral”. Although they contain a bit of a feminist bias they are worth reading due to their use of original source material in researching and their lack of exaggeration of the conditions and prevailing circumstances. The TV mini series Against the Wind was also quite good (although quite romanticised)

    • Pedant says:

      11:23am | 10/08/12

      <The Fatal Shore is a work of fiction>
      Extensively footnoted fiction? I thought he did refer to contemporary sources.
      What was the reality of convict life, bushwalking, fresh damper and wild-flower parties? Perhaps you could point me to a more truthful account anubis.

    • Pedant says:

      11:57am | 10/08/12

      Lots of people here freely using the term ‘fiction’ (i.e. wholly imaginative) interchangeably with ‘speculation on the past supported by scholarship’. Perhaps Hughes’ book ‘Culture of Complaint’ applies equally to this country.

    • Rob says:

      07:18am | 10/08/12

      The comments on education are poorly considered - I completed matriculation in 1979 and English was not compulsory even then - and I was very glad about that because it gave more time for science and Maths. Apart from that, I learnt much more about English grammar doing Latin and German that I ever learnt in English. You’re right about the reluctance to tell parents how it really is but that’s driven by several factors: for every parent that wants to know how it really is, there are 7 or 8 who will want to know what the teacher has against their brilliant little darling; teachers don’t actually know how their students stack up against any other students than those in their experience; teachers own pay structure provides automatic advancement irrespective of performance.

      But what takes the cake are your comments about the research project - considering the standard of performance of your journalistic colleagues, where do you, as a journalist, get off claiming to know anything about what research is all about?

    • acotrel says:

      08:29am | 10/08/12

      I pursued studies throughout my whole working life.  The most important subject I ever studied was at Melbourne High School.  It was English Expression, and it involved a lot of work about clear thinking.  It helped me cope with some very dangerous ,even life-threatening situations.  And it even helps me today when I attempt to get people thinking on various important topics on several forums.
      There is a danger these days in that Eddie Bernays’s methods are widely used in advertising and political propoganda.  It is easy to be sold a pup if you don’t know the basics of clear thinking - evidence ,some of the stuff which often appears on this forum !!

    • M says:

      07:57am | 10/08/12

      English might not have been so bad if we weren’t forced to write about some emotional journey bollocks.

    • iansand says:

      08:58am | 10/08/12

      Quite right.  We should have studied technical manuals.  At least we would have learnt how to repair a 1968 Torana.

    • M says:

      09:33am | 10/08/12

      I wouldn’t have minded, but when we heard “journey” in year 11 we were thinking “fuck yeah, we’re going to write about pirates or space exploration or traveling to the exotic east. Adventure, exploration, swashbuckling and what not!”

      Then the teacher told us we had to write about a significant event and detail how it shaped us as a person and the emotional journey we went through. You know, all the chick stuff and what those “men” crying on masterchef do.

      Dissapointment was us.

    • iansand says:

      10:05am | 10/08/12

      You should have written about repairing a 1968 Torana and what it meant to you.  Like picking up chicks.

    • Tim the Toolman says:

      10:57am | 10/08/12

      iansand….that is a very quick way to a D at best.  The only time I received less than a B in English, was during Year 11.  Let’s just say the teacher did not take kindly to anything she considered offensive.  As near as I could tell, “offensive” was defined as anything written by a man.

      Fortunately, my Year 12 teacher was excellent and displayed none of the shallow characteristics of her colleague.

    • Gordon says:

      01:34pm | 10/08/12

      There is a definite problem with the books they choose for High School. My kids (both kinds) are both keen readers and disliked most of the books chosen. All about “issues” to be analysed in nauseating detail (i.e. listen and regurgitate teacher expounding on social issue de jour), zero plot and whiny characters. I do realise there is more to literature than bang crash kapow but mixing a little action in would not kill them. Hemingway managed it.

    • Dom says:

      09:09am | 10/08/12

      @penbo, we could do a lot worse than look to the ‘Fatal Shore’ for inspiration for the history curriculum in Australia. It is a captivating read, and any kids that claim Australian history is boring would be swiftly set straight.

    • Bertrand says:

      09:28am | 10/08/12

      Indeed. My copy is getting pretty tattered.

      I would be interested reading some of his other work. I knew he was a historian but was unaware that he was a cultural commentator as well.

    • Ross says:

      09:53am | 10/08/12

      I found the Fatal Shore one of the most interesting books ever read by me .So much so I read it twice and developed a keen interest in Australia’s history . A lot couldn’t hold a candle to Bob’s book .Rest in peace mister Hughes.

    • Father Joseph says:

      10:05am | 10/08/12

      Like Hughes, my life has been complicated by my knowing much more about many things than others do (except Acotrel, that is). So I have been a whistleblower (WB) quite often, to the point where employers wanted to sack me and I got left with much less money for retirement than I expected. But that’s how it is with money.
      Now, about this WB thing? Can the WB ever win, and what might be won? Will any legislation ever work and, if so, how can it? So why do people less smart than I am keep doing it? Can’t they control themselves? Why?

    • Expat Ozzie says:

      10:12am | 10/08/12

      Penbo: I fully agree with your assessment of the low quality education system in Australia. This isn’t confined to our school and university system it is also prevalent in trade training. May years ago I was an aircraft mechanic. I trained many individuals over the years and watched the pass requirements move from fail to “not competent” (I preferred incompetent as a descriptor). Back in the day if you failed enough times you lost your job. Few lost their jobs as they tended to smarten up and do better next time. After the not competent came in you could see the attitude change and the standards drop.

      I currently live in an Asian country. Here the standards of education are far higher as well as the discipline of the kids. If I walk into say, McDonalds, during the day there are always kids with their books open studying. I can’t imagine seeing that in Australia. A couple of months ago I watched a spelling competition hosted in a major shopping complex with a huge crowd watching. Try to find something like that in Australia. The kids participating would be treated like losers in Australia. Here they are treated with respect. The kids weren’t spelling in one language either, they were expected to spell in Mandarin , English and Bahasa .

      I am also a firm believer that we start education to late in Australia. My 3 year old daughter goes to a school not a child care centre. She loves going and has achieved results I couldn’t have dreamed of before. She now speaks Manarin at the same level as her native speaking school fiends. She has no English artefacts in her speech because she has started at such a young age. She can also write her name, address and all the numbers up to 20 in both English and Chinese. She also speaks Bahasa at the same level. She also understands the concept of addition and spell quiet a few simple words.

      If Australia does not bring it’s education levels back up to a high standard we will be left in the dust by the far more disciplined approach of our northern neighbours.

    • Swingdog says:

      12:32pm | 10/08/12

      Finland, with the highest school achievement ranking in the world, starts school later than we do.

    • amy says:

      12:35pm | 10/08/12

      starting too early isnt good for kids…neither is “tiger parenting”

    • Expat Ozzie says:

      04:24pm | 10/08/12

      Swingdog: I agree that quality and not quantity is the essential ingredient to a top education system. My observations are based on my daughters and her class mates response to starting a more structured learning at an earlier age. She actually loves going and is disappointed when it’s weekend.

      amy: I thought someone might come up with something along the lines of “tiger parenting”. Actually we are not tiger parents at all. She was going to child care for half a day. They ran the Waldorf Steiner program of inclusive learning. She did very well there and it was the teacher that told us she should move on to a more structured learning because she was ready for it. She put us onto a private Chinese school.

      They run a curriculum with defined goals of what the children should be able to do at the conclusion of each term. They use an inclusive interactive approach. There is no pressure on the kids to achieve, they are after all only 3. Rather the approach is to give the children choices and having them make decisions on there own. An example is writing. They practice there letters by tracing or painting which is a common approach. There is no pressure for the kids to actually write the letters freehand. I was going to write her mum’s mothers day card but she would not have a bar of that. She insisted she would write it herself. She did an amazing job. I was quite frankly amazed that a three year old could hand write all the letters without assistance (I showed her what to write of course).

      She started for just half days to see how she was going. Her Chinese was progressing exceptionally and she was happy so we extended for the afternoon session of Chinese class. We were picking her up at around 2:30 in the afternoon. Two months ago she decided she wanted to go for the full day. Then she decided she could go to class on her own. I used to walk her into class room but now she has band me from that. She’s very proud that she knows the way and get there her own.

      At no time have we pushed her. Instead we just get involved with what she is doing. She is teaching me Chinese, she’s quite picky about my poor annunciation to by the way. She has also taught me how to write all the Chinese characters form 1 to 20.

      What I have seen in her since starting is an increase in self confidence. She is far more independent and decisive then other kids her age. I don’t think starting to early is a problem at all if it’s done right. I actually think molly coddling is more of a problem. Young kids are eager to learn. We learn at our fastest rate when we’re 2-3 years old.

    • NightStalker says:

      10:14am | 10/08/12

      My care factor is zero and I hate everyone equally and I can’t stand dumbf***s!!

    • Russell says:

      10:26am | 10/08/12

      I have read the Fatal Shore, which should be compulsory reading for all high school students. Yes, its history, and a brutal one at that….but it also explains a lot about our modern Australian societal attitudes and culture (e.g. tall poppy syndrome, the cult of alcohol, the celebrity of criminals, our fixation on sporting prowess, our fawning respect for royalty, corruption).
      I did not read The Culture of Complaint in fear it would make me intolerably grumpy for the rest of my life.

    • Malcolm says:

      10:39am | 10/08/12

      Hughes disliked loose thinking.  Clarity of thought takes effort; unfortunately many people want their opinions treated as having equal value but will not take the troulble to be informed and to think rather than reflect whatever they hear.  Informed, thoughtful students bring the best out of a teacher as do informed, thoughtful listeners out of anyone.  Similarly, crafting words to express your thoughts takes effort whatever your level of skill.

    • George says:

      11:20am | 10/08/12

      There is not enough incentive to be a smart person. Often the pay is awful, or not much better than for a significantly dumber job. For instance the pay for scientists is about $60-$80k. You can get that being a store manager in retail or if you run your own little tradie business god knows how much they’re getting.

      We need to PAY our smart people better. People have access to job sites now and can see where the money is.

    • kitteh says:

      12:02pm | 10/08/12

      You’re also treated with contempt and ignorance by the public (look at the comments some posters have made about scientists in articles on The Punch, for instance), have zero job security (medical research funding is constantly under threat, particularly if your field isn’t ‘sexy’ or part of a government agenda, as mental health is currrently) and often exploited by employers who feel threatened (bullying is rampant in academia, particularly by older permanent staff who achieved their position through longevity). I know so many people who have quit the field or moved overseas - the Australian brain drain is very, very real. That drive to make a difference in the world can’t sustain you when you have to deal with years of abuse for a pay packet that’s little more than an insult.

      RIP Robert Hughes (The Fatal Shore one, not the Chester).

    • Colin says:

      12:29pm | 10/08/12

      @George 11:20am | 10/08/12
      “...For instance the pay for scientists is about $60-$80k…”

      Two things:

      1) That is a BASE pay rate of which you speak; I am paid significantly more than that because of tenure of service and seniority

      2) However, even if I wasn’t paid so much more, I would still do exactly what I do because I LOVE doing it…! Too many people these days think that a successful career is all about MONEY when, in fact, it is all about satisfaction and being paid to do what you love…

      Sure, I could go and do some mind-numbing job of which you speak and earn more money, but how satisfying would that be? What a dull and vacuous existence doing something you don’t like - wasting most of your life - just because it pays more..?

    • George says:

      01:35pm | 10/08/12

      @Colin

      There’s only so many people who are so fascinated by brainy work. I’d say they’re very much in the minority. Most people approach it as just a job. In my experience once you know what you’re doing it just becomes another rote activity. Maybe not in science, I wouldn’t know, but certainly among other types of work.

      Mind-numbing work can be enjoyable too. For instance the lack of mental stress can be a plus.

      You really expect people to take on a massive hecs debt, all the stress of uni and having no money, only to end up on the same or less pay as an idiot?

    • Russell says:

      01:53pm | 10/08/12

      Depends on what branch of science we are talking about and which marketplace. As a professional now employed as a consultant environmental scientist I am certainly getting a lot more than $60-80k which is about what a newly graduated environmental scientist can expect as a starting salary here in Perth. Now when the boom ends those salaries will revert to mean….but for the time being science is in demand.

    • Colin says:

      01:59pm | 10/08/12

      @George says: 01:35pm | 10/08/12

      ” (Do)...You really expect people to take on a massive hecs debt, all the stress of uni and having no money, only to end up on the same or less pay as an idiot?”

      You get a massive HECS debt either way, and the more you get paid, the more you have to pay off it.

      Having “No money” at uni doesn’t correlate to “no” money at work, even if you aren’t “well paid”; you certainly learn to live on less and enjoy life more rather than having to have all the latest consumerist trappings…

      And, “Idiot”? That is a VERY subjective term

    • John says:

      11:25am | 10/08/12

      Robert Hughes was a great art critic and the Fatal Shore was a classic,as was the Culture of Complaint. But his work on Hey Dad was ordinary. And those allegations about sexually assaulting little girls are very disturbing.

    • Anubis says:

      11:52am | 10/08/12

      @ John - WTF - surely you are joking. Two completely different people.

    • john says:

      02:12pm | 10/08/12

      It’s the same guy.

    • James1 says:

      02:59pm | 10/08/12

      So Robert Hughes died four days ago, and then was arrested yesterday in England?  Robert Hughes is clearly a zombie.

      I always knew it was only a matter of time until the zombie apocalypse began.

    • Steve says:

      04:25pm | 10/08/12

      I know I shouldn’t laugh, but too late. I did.

    • Leigh says:

      11:26am | 10/08/12

      “One of the first acts of Campbell Newman’s premiership in Queensland was to axe the state’s literary awards, a deliberate button-pushing exercise aimed at reassuring rednecks that he wasn’t going to waste much-needed public dough on what hillbillies in the Carolinas call fancy book learning’.”

      Or, could it not be the Right of politics dealing with the Left of politics that ran awards, at great expense, for untalented, left-wing authors?

      With Hughes’ correct attitude to mediocrity and the appalling state of education in Australia, and the fear of hurting peoples’ feelings, it is unlikely that he would have objected to the removal of ego-tripping for biased dead-heads in Queensland.

      However, it is clear that David Pemberton is using Hughes as a spring board for his own feelings about the education business – and that’s what it is now – and his feelings are rightly shared by many. The problem starts at the beginning: primary schools and secondary schools, where students are simply not brought to the stage where they are anywhere near being ready for tertiary education. No matter, the universities are now run by bureaucrats who are there to get bums on seats and make money for governments, even though many entrants have to attend remedial English and arithmetic classes as a bridge to dumbed-down degrees that aren’t worth the paper they are written on.

      No wonder our ‘professionals’ aren’t what they used to be. They are over-confident and under-educated.

    • JamesH says:

      12:55pm | 10/08/12

      I work in education and see so many students come through who can tell you in 150 words why they are the ideal student for the wonderful degree they wish to apply for, but can’t do the math needed to work out their total course fees, or how many study hours they need on average.  Some of this, I put down to laziness.  Kids today are spoon-fed the answers, they don’t need to research, don’t need to apply mental logic or work out anything.  Then, they grow up and look to get into higher ed and the workforce and suddenly discover that they have no research skills or mental arithmetic, and that these skills are valuable and necessary in the real world.  This is why they whinge about not being able to get jobs - they aren’t necessarily stupid, it’s that their intellect is fed and not properly GROWN.

    • JamesH says:

      12:56pm | 10/08/12

      I work in education and see so many students come through who can tell you in 150 words why they are the ideal student for the wonderful degree they wish to apply for, but can’t do the math needed to work out their total course fees, or how many study hours they need on average.  Some of this, I put down to laziness.  Kids today are spoon-fed the answers, they don’t need to research, don’t need to apply mental logic or work out anything.  Then, they grow up and look to get into higher ed and the workforce and suddenly discover that they have no research skills or mental arithmetic, and that these skills are valuable and necessary in the real world.  This is why they whinge about not being able to get jobs - they aren’t necessarily stupid, it’s that their intellect is fed and not properly GROWN.

    • Jenny says:

      01:18pm | 10/08/12

      I’ve always treasured my copy of “The Shock of the New” and wished that I could one day travel to all the galleries which hang the paintings which inspired the book.

      Journalists blame the education system for the ‘dumbing down’ or boganisation of our Australian culture, but surely, the media has alot to answer for. Not the journos, but the Boards that instruct the editors to slash and burn proper investigative pieces in favour of scandal, titillation and useless polemic opinion pieces (I don’t put Penbo in this category, I generally like his writing). But alot of media output today is genuine crap.

    • Steve Putnam says:

      02:42pm | 10/08/12

      I was living in London in 1979 when “The Shock of the New” was first televised on BBC2. Absolutely riveting insightful stuff. I didn’t miss an episode. Hughes was probably Australia’s finest writer in any genre. There was also much to be admired in his ability to ruffle feathers whether in Sydney, London or New York.

    • Jenny says:

      01:19pm | 10/08/12

      I’ve always treasured my copy of “The Shock of the New” and wished that I could one day travel to all the galleries which hang the paintings which inspired the book.

      Journalists blame the education system for the ‘dumbing down’ or boganisation of our Australian culture, but surely, the media has alot to answer for. Not the journos, but the Boards that instruct the editors to slash and burn proper investigative pieces in favour of scandal, titillation and useless polemic opinion pieces (I don’t put Penbo in this category, I generally like his writing). But alot of media output today is genuine crap.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter