As Lainie Anderson wrote in this piece yesterday, it’s wrong for anyone, let alone the likes of Peter Costello, to cast aspersions on the character of all footballers based on a few sporadic incidents. Because really, when you’re dealing with up to 1,000 blokes between 18 and 32, a bit of Tony Abbott’s favourite phrase is going to happen from time to time.

Those dark foreboding clouds weren't kidding, eh Ricky? Pic: Colin Murty

But this stuff with The Girl at the heart of the St Kilda facebook pictures scandal, and her allegations about big time player agent Ricky Nixon is a bad business. This is some seriously low rent theatre we’re watching now.

Let’s start with the girl first. The 17 year old schoolgirl, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, first came in contact with St Kilda players who visited her school on a footy clinic.

She later bedded one of them (legally, as she was 16 at the time), pinched a bunch of nude pics off a player’s computer, then posted the pics to the world via Facebook.

Allegations of extortion and improper behaviour then flew back and forth between the girl and the club like a ping pong ball. And now, a full year after the whole sordid saga started, the girl is living in a hotel room paid for by the club.

The Girl, who for legal reasons cannot be identified, has been variously portrayed as “foolish”, “mentally disturbed” and as “a victim”. The first term is beyond dispute, as her unannounced visit to a certain newsroom recently would suggest. The second is not mine to comment on. As for her victimhood? Unlikely. Very, very unlikely.

To all appearances, the girl appears to be revelling in the publicity which so many children of the social media revolution crave.

Inspired by their charismatic Che Guevara figure, Corey Worthington, the aim is to get your face out there any old how. Or if not your face (that legal thing again) then your perfectly shaved, tanned legs, your little black dress and your pert cleavage.

Then one day, whammo! You turn 18 and you can really milk this notoriety thing for all it’s worth. Corey Worthington’s apparently just landed a role in a Hollywood flick. I don’t know what exactly. Maybe’s he’s playing a meerkat in Madagascar 3 or some such.

She may even be lucky enough to have a certain radio network not exactly known for their high moral standards regarding minors come calling.

But the point is, even if she seeks nothing, and was really really, truly in lurv with a football player several years older than her very young self, she has still been a long way from what you might call retiring.

Now to Nixon. The 47 year old was Australia’s biggest name agent in any code in the mid 2000s, with the likes of Riewoldt and Cousins on his books.

I first met him in 2005, at the height of his success, and ran into him a couple of times thereafter, always at photo shoots for big name players. He was, it must be said, no more arrogant than any other agent but he wasn’t warm either. With his phone virtually glued to his ear, he sometimes had a way of making you feel you were wasting his time.

By 2009, Nixon’s lot started to unravel, when he crashed his sports car into a tram and fled the scene. He later lost his license for 10 months. And now all this. Nixon denies he has had sexual relations with the girl, but admits to “inappropriate dealings”.

Nixon will this week be hauled before the AFL Players’ Association, who administer the AFL’s accredited agents scheme. It is uncertain what will come of this, though the most likely outcome would appear to be nothing. The Accredited Agents’ Code of Conduct is long on an agent’s obligations to the client, but relatively light on their general conduct.

By contrast, the NRL’s accredited agent’s scheme is run by the league itself, and contains a tougher code of ethics.

Of course, no amount of fine print will ever make every player agent the type of person you’d take home to meet your mother. Like real estate agents, player agents are very good at making money – and that, when all is said and done, is all that most players want.

Let me say this, though. I have known several terrifically proactive agents. I once went to a nightclub with a really bright young star of a major national sporting code. The agent went too, and gave the star and his friends a big, stern pep talk on behaviour before he cut them adrift for the night. To this day, that player has never been in the headlines for the wrong reasons, give or take a silly tweet.

That’s the the type of agent you’d love to see more of. The sort of person who’d rather act like a parent than be one of the boys.

If Ricky Nixon isn’t debarred this week, here’s hoping he gets the fright of his life, and his colleagues in the industry likewise.

As for she who cannot be named, well, let’s just hope her parents ground her. If that punishment carries any weight anymore.

174 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Terence Trent says:

      05:03am | 21/02/11

      A middle-aged manager. That’s like shooting for the DJ but ending up with the DJ’s friend.

    • Macca says:

      07:53am | 21/02/11

      Like going for the lead singer and getting the bassist.

      ..or one of the roadies.

    • Amy Sturt says:

      09:32am | 21/02/11

      Bass players do it with rhythm, Macca…

    • Jugg says:

      11:28am | 21/02/11

      The Drummer?

      No, probably nobody is that desperate.

    • Josie says:

      02:51pm | 21/02/11

      The roadie who held the door open for the others.

    • Mark says:

      04:23pm | 21/02/11

      Enough is enough. It’s time to get rid of the “victim” tag and call this little tart exactly what she is, a scheming evil girl with a sucker punch that would level Danny Green. No disrespect to Danny. The footballers have shown plenty of bad judgment, but she is just playing with them. How many marriages and careers is she going to destroy until everyone wakes up to her game.

    • Kerryn says:

      06:13am | 21/02/11

      Seriously, if this loser was my manager I’d sack him and run as far away as I could.  Who needs to be tarred with the same brush as him, especially Nick Riewoldt at the moment?

      Of course, she’s timed this beautifully-right after Costello tells us that all footy players are sexual deviants who will rape your daughters at a moments notice.

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:58am | 21/02/11

      There doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with him. She looks reasonably attractive and legal so at least you’d have a crack.

      She seems like the typically vapid tramp that society seems to churn out by the barrel-full these days.

      You can just imagine the story now:

      Girl sees hot boy. Girl likes hot boy. Girl throws herself at hot boy. Hot boy thinks “Yeah, not bad, I’ll have me some of that”. Girl expects more than what hot boy is interested in. Hot boy moves on to next target. Girl is jilted and jealous and does many stupid things because she over-rated herself and her chances. She brought it on herself and got what she deserved.

      Now we get this little media sideline story between things that really matter in the world, such as 200 Libyan protesters being killed and Barry O’Farrell’s 16 minutes speech at the NSW Liberals election campaign launch.

    • simon says:

      08:23am | 21/02/11

      I agree Kerryn, I have very little respect for 95% of all footballers.

    • Warren says:

      11:13am | 21/02/11

      Tubesteak says:  “There doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with him”

      A married 47 year old buys alcohol for and hangs out with a 17 year old in a hotel room in his underpants? No there’s nothing wrong with him.

    • stfcfan says:

      11:57am | 21/02/11

      Nicely said Kerryn, totally agreed!
      Simon i think you’ve missed Kerryn’s point, and if you have ‘very little respect for 95% of footballers’ then go find a new game

    • mk says:

      01:41pm | 21/02/11

      Thank you Warren, you’ve given me hope there is still a moral compass out there somewhere.
      People like Tubesteak really make you wonder.!!

    • Tubesteak says:

      02:44pm | 21/02/11

      Warren are you moralising for the rest of us and do you have proof?

      The only really wrong thing there is the alcohol as she is not of legal drinking age.

      But that’s for the police to deal with. Not people like you and I.

      Anyway, finding a woman over the age of 15 that isn’t drunk off her face these days is a rare is hen’s teeth.

    • Paul says:

      06:18am | 21/02/11

      Another piece of “blokes-writing” that tries to protect the AFL code and the boys. Let’s just remember that the girl was at school then came in contact with the AFL sports starts and from there it was all down hill.

      I feel sorry for the girl and her family.

    • kim says:

      06:48am | 21/02/11

      I have no sympathy for the girl and if you read even quarter of what she has been writing online you wouldn’t have any sympathy for her.  Her actions are less than aboveboard, she’s proven herself to be a manipulative liar.

    • BK says:

      06:56am | 21/02/11

      So you wouldn’t mind it if someone posted naked photos of you on facebook? Next question, if someone was out to hurt you, would you shout them a hotel room to “sort themselves out”? Would you like it if your daughter was behaving like this and was getting rewarded with free hotel rooms and possibly a payout? It is alledged that she stole his credit card and bought an airline ticket. Would you be angry if that happened to you?

      Football clubs need to stop protecting these nasty women and go after them.

    • Macca says:

      07:56am | 21/02/11

      @kim, I have no sympathy for her or him.

      The whole thing is just beyond ridiculous now. It’s becoming boring and tedious and I just want them both to disappear into anonymity

    • Tim says:

      08:15am | 21/02/11

      Puhllleaase,
      not another comment that tries to excuse any/all behaviour from this girl.
      She met football players, followed the players around, slept with multiple players from different teams, got pregnant, got dumped, got mad, posted nude pictures of players (none of whom were actually the ones she said had treated her “badly”).
      Now these players may not have been the nicest gentlemen in the world, but last time I looked that’s not a crime.

    • mary says:

      10:10am | 21/02/11

      ///Take pity on ‘traumatised’ girl, expert tells Saints///

      Finally a voice of sanity in all this madness.

      It’s about treating others like a human being ... We know when something is wrong and it’s not just about what the law says. It’s about how we want to treat others and ourselves. It’s about basic decency.

      We are talking about a school kid who was being taken advantage of. That’s the start and finish of the story. If the kid were to undress herself and throw herself into some ones lap, the decent thing to do is say, sorry hon, but this is not appropriate. Anyone who is not capable of refusing a school kid her antics, should have a good long hard look at themselves and their motives. Not blame the kid. Cause that’s what she is, just a kid.

      What is wrong with this whole story is society’s response to it and putting the blame on the child in their desperate efforts to cover up for and protect their precious (infantile) celebs.


      http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/take-pity-on-traumatised-girl-expert-tells-saints-20110219-1b083.html

    • GRAN says:

      10:22am | 21/02/11

      This girl is bi-polar,any man or boy that has anything to do with her is asking for trouble,she opens her legs ,opens her mouth and opens her purse,she gets far to much media cover for the tart she is,Mr Nixon should have known he was being set up,she out smarted him,now she is the princess and he the dirty old man,

    • Phill says:

      01:00pm | 21/02/11

      Mary says “It’s about treating others like a human being ... We know when something is wrong and it’s not just about what the law says. It’s about how we want to treat others and ourselves. It’s about basic decency.”
      You mean like not posting nude photo’s of someone who had done nothing to you on the internet?

    • Mark says:

      01:41pm | 21/02/11

      no, she didnt come in to contact with the plays at school. she doesn’t attend school.

    • Simonious says:

      01:53pm | 21/02/11

      Paul feel sorry for her family but dont bother with the girl. She has a naked self portrait of her kicking around in cyberspace that she has taken while standing in front of a mirror with the phones camera. A mate of mine showed me it recently and while i admired the photo i reminded him that because she is under 18 it would be considered child porn. So i want to know why the cops have not charged her with creating and distributing child porn. I mean how did it get off her phone and into my mates inbox. Does she send this photo to AFL players to entice them.

    • mary says:

      05:36pm | 21/02/11

      @Phil, Mary was quoting professor Catharine Lumby who is helping to change NRL players’ attitudes towards women (quotes as provided in Mary’s link_.

      And yes, Mary agrees with the professor.

    • Sarah M says:

      06:40am | 21/02/11

      you omit the fact that she lost a pregnancy (twins) to the St Kilda player.  her behaviour is certainly immature, erratic and attention seeking, but it should be acknowledged that she has been through rather a lot.  Nixon is a disgrace.

    • TChong says:

      07:05am | 21/02/11

      Agree about Nixon, but it would be hard to know , without DNA tests etc, who the father was.
      Other than for claims made by the girl, is / was any legally verified proof ever presented about the alledged miscarriage?

    • Tim says:

      08:17am | 21/02/11

      Was the father of the twins ever found out?
      She was sleeping with different players from different clubs at the time.

    • Jem says:

      12:00pm | 21/02/11

      Alleged pregnancy… She’s told way too many lies for the pregnancy to be accepted as fact…

    • Hermano says:

      07:09am | 21/02/11

      She’s (still) just a kid.
      Imagine if it was your sister?  You’d be playing the victim card for all it’s worth.
      As for me, I’ve gone off all professional team sports, particularly ones where blokes chase a ball around a paddock.

    • TChong says:

      07:12am | 21/02/11

      This guy would have to be a clown.
      With the girls sad ( on so many levels) story so well known, this guy must have been incredibly niaeve even to have gone anywhere near her, without a chaperone , recording every and anything .
      What an amazingly dumb thing to do.

    • C1 says:

      07:56am | 21/02/11

      Chongy,

      I could not agree more with you on this one.

    • DG says:

      08:09am | 21/02/11

      In the modern era it’s had to know the difference between a chaperone and an accomplice. Once the allegation is made you now have two people defending themselves not just the one.

    • DMartin says:

      08:33am | 21/02/11

      If a 47 year old man went after your 17 year old daughter would you call him a naive clown or a predator?

    • TChong says:

      08:57am | 21/02/11

      Your right DM, ( our daughter is 17), and I would be using harsher language.
      I was trying not to be too hyperbolic . ( for a change), and in recognising that any inferrence of anything too unsavory , is ( at this stage ) gossip and would unfair to Nixon.

    • Realism says:

      09:04am | 21/02/11

      DMartin, if your spunky 17 year old neigbour was chasing a 47 year old man, would you call her a victim or a ?

    • Farkurnell says:

      08:15pm | 21/02/11

      agreed .talk about dumb and dumber.Rugby bad boys are looking like choir boys compared to Favola & Nixon

    • killerbee says:

      07:25am | 21/02/11

      How stupid can this bloke be? Talk about thinking with your dick, this has taken it to the extreme.

      Why would any adult male, especially one from St Kilda, be alone with this woman? If you are trying to help then send a female office person to be helpful.
      Nixon should lose all his clients, they should all sack him for terminal stupidity.

    • PD says:

      11:39am | 21/02/11

      Has Ricky ever heard of the term ‘plausible deniability’? He denies having sex with the girl, despite a photo she has of him in his underdaks. Sure, middle aged guys get naked with teenage girls all the time, without having sex. There comes a point where denial does more harm than good.

    • Jugg says:

      07:29am | 21/02/11

      Please!  Not for a second suggest that it is anyone else other than the media who have decided to display the girl’s ‘perfectly shaved, tanned legs, your little black dress and your pert cleavage’.  This is continued exploitation, fully, openly, sanctioned and encouraged by the media.

    • Eskimo says:

      07:43am | 21/02/11

      As an agent he was just trying to get his 10% of what his charges received.

    • AdamC says:

      09:08am | 21/02/11

      Cheeky!

    • Sandy says:

      04:40pm | 21/02/11

      Although he probably negotiated for 15%!

    • Catherine says:

      07:51am | 21/02/11

      Anthony Sharwood, I am horrified by your ignorance and the fact that it has ended up available for public consumption. Did you actually do any research before writing this rubbish? Or did you throw it together based on articles from Daily Telegraph and ACA?

      And you obviously know nothing about teenagers. They might seem like they know what they’re doing and they definitely think they know what they’re doing but they are so still very much figuring it out and making mistakes. Im not saying its up to all adults to protect all teenagers (although, that would be nice), but it’s up to adults to at least make sure that they’re not part of a teenagers mistake ie don’t have sex with teenagers. Don’t be inappropriate with them and if they are behaving inapprpriately around you, discourage the behavior and maybe even try to help them.

      Not all teenagers today are like Corey Worthington and regardless, don’t they deserve compassion and respect? Teenagers are human beings too.

      Apologies for sloppy typing, I’m on a bus.

    • Emma says:

      09:46am | 21/02/11

      I agree.  I’m 21 and even now when I remember being 16/17 I thought I was beyond amazing- sad but true.  So many people go through that phase at 16/17 where they think that they are mature and can get away with anything and can’t see things outside their own little world… Whilst this girl hasn’t exactly handled herself in the best possible way in front of the media I think its wrong to judge her as an adult- she is still a teenager trying to work out who she is.

    • Kathy says:

      12:03pm | 21/02/11

      Totally agree with Catherine & Emma - teenagers can be all over the place, seemingly mature one moment, a kid the next.  47 year old men should hopefully not have that problem.  And if the girl is bipolar, she desperately needs a psychiatrist & some medication.  Plus some parents that know what she is up to at all times.

    • kp says:

      12:55pm | 21/02/11

      Catherine, beautifully written and I totally agree !!  I got to about the second paragraph and felt like I wanted to be sick.  I knew right then and there where this article was going even before I got to the end.  Anthony Sharwood, you should be ashamed of yourself.  If I was married to you, I would divorce you with that kind of disgusting attitude you have towards young girls.  Do you have a daughter?  Me thinks NOT. You came down on this girl terribly (and by the way, we don’t know her name, so my question is this “notoriety” you so think she is craving, well, there isn’t any because we don’t know her name.  If she wanted notoriety then surely we would know it by now ?????? Idiot.” .  And who cares what she wears, what about his actions and the actions of the AFL footballers who you seem to defend so quickly.  Now, as far as I can see, they are the *&uts; in this situation.  So it is OK for older men to fornicate with each other and teenage girls but it isn’t OK for a naive girl to make a mistake.  Oh, of course, one rule for men and another rule for women.  I am so outraged by the way Aussie men treat women, whether it be teenagers or any other age.  Once again Catherine, well written and you too Emma !!!!!!!!!!!!

    • BK says:

      02:11pm | 21/02/11

      @KP

      You seem to be the one with different rules for different genders. Why is it ok for her to sleep around, but not these footballers?

    • Likes Joining Dots says:

      02:40pm | 21/02/11

      @Catherine

      You appear to make a distinction between Corey Worthington and the St Kilda girl. It seems that you view Corey as the worst of the two and I cannot quite make the same connection.

      One contributed to trashing a house for ‘fun’ during a party one night.

      The other, over almost a year resorted to theft, admitted to lying and also contributed to trashing the reputation of sports people she does not even know, purely because they were from the same club as the guy she wanted revenge on.

      You state teenagers ‘deserve compassion and respect’? Of course they do. But when older teens are involved in vandalism and defamation should they be excused as it’s just another part of teens ‘figuring it out’?

      As an aside, this is in no way an excuse for Nixons behaviour.

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      03:34pm | 21/02/11

      @kp the funny thing - or should i sat the scary thing - is that my wife’s initials are kp. And yes, I have a daughter, who is 7. We have a great relationship but if she ended up behaving like this 17 year old, i would have very, very, very stern words with her, to say the last

    • Sandy says:

      04:43pm | 21/02/11

      Catherine says: “Apologies for sloppy typing, I’m on a bus.”
      That’s OK - the players were all on a sloppy bike!

    • NEFFA says:

      04:44pm | 21/02/11

      Anthony, what if it was your 40 year old son acting like this? still harsh words or “he’s an adult….....”

    • meinsydney says:

      06:31pm | 21/02/11

      I totally agree.  A 17 year old is still a child, no matter how mature she may seem.  Girls of that age are easily impressed and it’s easy to see how she got herself into this unfortunate situation.  Nixon on the other hand, is 47 years old and knows better than to become involved with a child, who is clearly only impressed with him because of his stature in the world of football.  She is certainly the victim of this whole mess….the only one not mature enough to know better.  I find it very concerning that middle age men see it differently.  She was taken advantage of in an obviously vulnerable state.  If it is proven he did provide her with alcohol, I hope he is prosecuted for that the same way any non “celebrity” would be for providing alcohol to a minor.

    • St. Michael says:

      12:11am | 22/02/11

      @ Anthony Sharwood: *snort* If a father is present, sober, straight, and not abusing his kids he’ll usually have a “great relationship” with his 7 year old daughter.  No great achievement there, sport.  Call back when they’re 13 or 14 and tell us how “great” your relationship with them is then.

      More pertinently, if you go by the girl’s own words from the earlier incidents, they’ve already disowned her.  She’s not welcome at her own house.  So they’ve probably already tried the recommended “stern talking to at the very least.”

    • Tim says:

      08:01am | 22/02/11

      Meinsydney,
      you’ve obviously never seen this girls twitter feed.

    • movingon says:

      07:54am | 21/02/11

      why were they paying for a hotel room for her?  definitely sounds like some sort of pay off to me…. the media need to be asking other questions here, but this girl sounds like a lolita character, who has admitted setting Nixon up.  She probably spilled somthing on his pants and offered ever so sweetly to dry them for him in the dryer, then out with the little 3mega pixel mobile phone camera.  She is seriously disturbed but she is a child and these are all grown men who closed ranks very quickly.  It should have been dealt with better.  Her poor parents are the ones I feel sorry for.

    • ana says:

      07:56am | 21/02/11

      I follow this girl on her twitter..
      Gotta say, she is one messed up kid..

      She posted a photo of herself with a black eye at the start of last week..

      I wonder who punched her?

    • TChong says:

      10:37am | 21/02/11

      someone who knows her, but missed her mouth.

    • Davida says:

      11:09am | 21/02/11

      I wonder why you follow this girl on her twitter?

    • Sandy says:

      04:51pm | 21/02/11

      Who punched her? The entire St Kilda Football Team I’d say!  And how have you followed her on twitter if her name is withheld?

    • disgusted says:

      08:09am | 21/02/11

      You describe a school girl 9 years younger than a 25 year old player bedding players. Are you kidding?  You reap what you sew.  Its a good thing the age of consent is no younger, who knows how low some of these players would stoop then!

    • H B Bear says:

      10:21am | 21/02/11

      I reaped a cardigan the other day.

    • There's a twist says:

      11:26am | 21/02/11

      You reaped what you knitted!

    • Bloggs says:

      08:13am | 21/02/11

      I saw some of what this girl wrot eon-line.  He rown mum disowned her for her antics.  I think St kilda should have followed Mum and eased her right out of the picture.  Who is in the worng on this? Is it the littel girl who lines men up for a killing and then jumps on them, or is it the football team and their bad manners.  Methinks there guilt in both camps, but this little girl is far from innocent.  She needs to grow up and move on.

    • Tim says:

      08:26am | 21/02/11

      What is it that Nixon is alleged to have done? What does innapropriate dealings mean?
      Sex, Drugs?
      If all it’s alleged, is that he had sex with her then what’s the problem?
      They are both over the age of consent, so no crime will have been committed. Do the AFL really want to kick Nixon out for simply having consensual sex with someone?
      However, surely Nixon would have to be the biggest idiot of all time if the allegations are true. Why would he want anything to do with her after what she did to his own clients?

    • movingonnow says:

      09:28am | 21/02/11

      tim makes a good point, while this is excellent fodder for news outlets, if they are both over the age of consent then I guess its just stupidity and not a legal question   So if so, why are we focusing on it at all.  Just answered my own question.  time to get off stupid blog sites and do some work!

    • BK says:

      10:21am | 21/02/11

      Imagine if any woman lost their job, because of an, admittedly foolish, fling with a much younger man.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:49am | 21/02/11

      BK, I seem to recall a number of women teachers losing their jobs for sleeping with students over the years

    • John C says:

      11:32am | 21/02/11

      Tim, he is 47 and she is 16. A bit off?

    • Golly Gosh says:

      09:23pm | 21/02/11

      Are you actually serious.  What did he do wrong ??  Well let’s see:  He has a wife and children at home while he cavorts in a hotel room with a child/girl 30yrs his junior, laden with booze, alledged drugs and ongoing recordings which the poor petal wasn’t aware of (yeh right).  But for the blink of an eye, he would be aptly labelled a paedophile or at the very least an abuser of under age girls.  He is a creep with zero respect for any woman.  If his wife has half a brain she will give him the heave ho, but that’s unlikely.  Simone Warne’s self respect has been so battered by the ex with the sexual disorder as have his kids from jibes at their schools about their ‘father’ that they actually believe that is all they are worth, so the circle of abuse conttinues.  The abused becomes the abuser.

    • Tim says:

      08:11am | 22/02/11

      Gollygosh,
      First of all the word alleged. Do you know what that means?
      -The only evidence of drugs i’ve seen is from her using them not him.
      -She’s 17, hardly the blink of an eye. Try 1&1/2 years.
      -He took a bottle of wine to her room, hardly laden with booze. And for a girl that freely admits to going into nightclubs every week, I don’t think it’s really a big deal.
      -Cheating on his wife is an issue for him and his wife. Maybe they have an open marriage or are seperated? How is that any of mine or your business?
      -This girl has specifically said that she wanted revenge and was out to cause trouble for him.
      -And how is any of this an issue for his employer? He hasn’t been charged with anything and is extremely unlikely to be. Do you want your employer coming into your house to use their own subjective morality to decide if what you are doing is OK by them?
      Oh and as for Simone Warne, puhhlleeeaassse. Chosing to constantly go back to a man who cheats and lies to you makes her a victim how?
      Really if you want to follow the all girls are victims line, at least try to come up with some better arguments.

    • john says:

      08:27am | 21/02/11

      @  the author “it’s wrong for anyone, let alone the likes of Peter Costello, to cast aspersions on the character of all footballers based on a few sporadic incidents.”

      A few sporadic incidents,  a   few   s p o r a d i c incidents…...try an avalanche of bible proportions. The drugs, scandals, drunken violence, car crashes, drink driving…....on and on and on year after year….sporadic?...are you insanely naive, or do you think the public is stupidly forgetful?

      Go do your research and think about your opening statement.

    • Tim says:

      09:11am | 21/02/11

      John,
      can you show me your research that shows that football players are any more likely to have problems than young men in the general populace?
      You must be insanely naive to think that these behaviours are limited to footballers.

    • john says:

      10:39am | 21/02/11

      @Tim, nice spin on the story about the footballers.

      If you can’t distinguish between public figures who a role models and private citizens then your showing your ineptness for all to see.

      If your wanting to expand the story any halfwit can see its a behavioral problem in society, you only mentioned what everyone already knew.

      Think before opening your trap Tim.

    • Tim says:

      11:50am | 21/02/11

      John,
      You disagree with the author’s assertion that people shouldn’t tar all footballers because of the bad behaviour of a few yet provide no evidence of your own of why they should be tarred with the same brush or why you think this kind of behaviour is any more prevalent in their ranks than the general population.
      Do you honestly think public figures should behave better than the rest of the population? if so, why?
      You may think footballers are role models, but I don’t. I just think they are normal young men who have been given lots of money for playing their chosen sport.
      Maybe try laying off the insults and substitute them with a logical argument?

    • john says:

      07:29pm | 21/02/11

      @Tim
      Please try to follow simple english in regards to what I have brought into question about the author - he claims a few sporadic incidents.

      The word sporadic is what is clearly questioned.

      Not certain why you have brought me into account for “the author’s assertion that people shouldn’t tar all footballers because of the bad behaviour” I didn’t question that at all. Clearly they should not all be tarred with the same brush! Your forgiven not following my statement’s intent. I always structure my statements to catch out scan readers.

      As for your question:
      “Do you honestly think public figures should behave better than the rest of the population? if so, why?”

      Simply yes, Don’t you think children and younger people starting out in life deserve to learn from their popular elder professionals whom they sometimes idolise?, after all in this instance they are supposed to be a professional in their chosen profession that happens to be sport.

      If your happy with the ‘“sporadic ” incidents, that’s fine, we live in a free democratic society, your free to live by those standards.  I will treasure mine.

    • farkurnell says:

      08:28pm | 21/02/11

      will you two boys stop sqabbling,your both right..This whole soap opera is a sad reflection on modern society with the media to share the blame.why are they giving this dillusional girl so much coverage when she really needs to be in a clinic.

    • AdamC says:

      08:48am | 21/02/11

      This is a pretty sympathetic article, which is not altogether surprising for a sports writer. From the perspective of a non-footy fan who doesn’t get starstruck by sportspeople or their celebrity agents, the whole thing looks pretty bad for the fellas.

      Not only was it extraordinarily inappropriate for the St Kilda players to get sexually involved with a school girl, it was also catastrophically idiotic. Sure, they weren’t to know that they (and some of their fellow players) would get caught up in the girl’s self-destructive melt-down narrative, but they are grown men who do know, as footy players, that their actions will be placed under scrutiny by the press and the public.

      And Ricky Nixon, he’s the biggest moron in the idiot parade. His behaviour beggars belief, again as much in its stupidity as its ‘inappropriateness’. As a client, I’d want to sack him for his foolishness alone, before we even get to his trashed reputation. 

      Is this girl a victim? Maybe not, though she obviously thinks she is. Are the players victims? Aside from Nick Riewoldt (who handled the whole thing badly but was placed in a diffiuclt position) no, they aren’t. And they should all take some responsibility for their actions. And that definitely includes the girl.

    • Hamish says:

      12:58pm | 21/02/11

      The secret is not to feel guilty for either party. Nixon’s a dodgy moron (every player he’s involved with ends up completely off the rails like Wayne Carey). He’s just been monumentally stupid. If you’re a player manager you really shouldn’t be gamed by a 17 year old school dropout.

      She’s just a manipulative skank, but at least she’s awesome at it.

      Finally football has a really juicy scandal! She’s the gift that just keeps on giving for the tabloid media.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      08:56am | 21/02/11

      I profoundly disagree with you Mr. Sharwood. One person in this saga is a child, the others are adults. I find your siding with the child abusers curious.

      Legal does not equal moral. Just remember that - a school clinic - which is suppossed to be about community building, promoting healthy lifestyles ect, was used by an employee of St Kilda football club as an opportunity to have sex with a child.

    • Budz says:

      09:07am | 21/02/11

      Child? Pfft! Make their age of consent 18 then and quit the whinging.

    • Macca says:

      09:15am | 21/02/11

      I don’t think Ant ever sided with the St Kilda players, just merely stated that the girl is reaping the benefits of what she herself sowed

    • hot tub political machine says:

      09:25am | 21/02/11

      I’m unsure of this but I’m pretty sure it was either Victoria or NSW that dropped the age of consent 1 year to 16, for no other reason than they didn’t have enough resources to keep investigating every case of child sexual abuse.

      Had this happened to St Kilda a couple of years ago some of their players would have had to stay home for that end of season trip to Miami - the US won’t grant an entry visa to sex offenders.

    • Tim says:

      09:33am | 21/02/11

      First of all the school clinic issue, isn’t one. The players were cleared by police of doing anything wrong. They didn’t swap numbers or do anything innapropriate. They later met at a pre-season game.
      Secondly, who’s morality is important? Yours?
      Just remember that your subjective morality is worth no more than the next persons.
      The only thing that should and does matter is the legality.
      If you disagree then you should be strongly petitioning the government, with regards to these laws.
      And had this happened when the laws were different, then the laws would have been different.
      How do you know in your hypothetical universe that the players would have ever slept with the girl if this was the case?

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:18am | 21/02/11

      You worry me Tim. Morality is purely subjective? I could point out the problems with that but it could easily end up with Godwin’s law being invoked.

      How about this, is someone who beats the expletative out of babies as a way to vent their frustration on an equal moral footing with the rest of the world because everythings subjective?

      I’m not a citizen of either NSW or Vic, but yes I would petition against such law changes had I been a citizen. My point in showing what would have happend but for the law to change is to point out that - according to many jurisdictions around the world - the acts of the St Kilda players make them child abusers. Just not in their state - where the law was changed to ease up the pressure on their child protection department - not because they thought it was moral.

    • Tim says:

      11:06am | 21/02/11

      Hot Tub,
      Harming other people is not morally subjective. You are infringing on other people’s rights.
      Who people choose to sleep with is however another matter. As long as it’s legal and consensual then it’s none of my or your business.
      If you want to go all hypothetical, imagine if someone said this in relation to gays having sex:
      “I find homosexual sex to be morally wrong, remember legal is not always moral. If these people had of done this a decade ago, then they would be charged and put in jail.”
      What would your reaction be then?
      I’m also very skeptical about these law changes you talk about. I’m pretty sure the age of consent has been 16 in most of the states for a while now. And no state would have ever changed the law just to ease pressure on child protection services. Can you provide links to this?
      Also, what does it matter what the law is elsewhere? The legal drinking age in the USA is 21, does that mean 18 year olds who drink in Australia are really secret criminals?
      The law is the law. If you don’t agree with it, then petition the parliament to have it changed. Otherwise all you are doing is trying to impose your own morality on other people.

    • Dig a says:

      11:27am | 21/02/11

      Buddy - she’s above the age of consent.  Don’t bleet that “she is a child”.  If she’s legally old enough for sex then the law obviously believes that she’s old enough to comprehend the consequences of her actions.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      12:56pm | 21/02/11

      Tim, I believe I saw it in a journal article rather than online, will check back some references at home and get back to you.

      Re lobbying the parliament, again I am not a Victorian resident so I have no business lobbying their parliament, should a proposal be put up to lower the age of consent in my jurisdiction, I would write my MP.

      Re gays having sex. This is a totally different area if we are talking about two adult gays, or if we are talking about an adult having sex with a child. That’s comparing apples and oranges. Sex between adults and adults, sex between teens and teens, and sex between adults and teens are all very different kettles of fish - regardless of sexuality. I don’t propose to stop adults having sex with one another, nor even teens. I do have a problem with adults having sex with children, because child protection is a community rather than individual responsibility. Precisely because children are children, we don’t leave their protection soley as their own business.

      @ Diga, you probably can see my response in the above comments. She may be ready to have sex - with another teen. I disagree thats its ok for adults to sleep with teens.

    • Tim says:

      02:44pm | 21/02/11

      @Hot Tub,
      that’s the thing.
      This isn’t child abuse, it isn’t sexual abuse.
      As long as you are over the age of consent then under the law you are considered to be an adult for making this decision. They are both considered adults where sexual decisions are concerned
      Under the law, it is exactly the same as my hypothetical.
      Now I may not fully agree with the law as it is, but as a society, we have decided that this is where we draw our line in the sand. If you don’t like it or don’t agree then make it an issue for parliament.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      04:38pm | 21/02/11

      Tim - I am not a victorian, I cannot petition the victorian parliament.

    • Zac de Spudnut says:

      09:09am | 21/02/11

      Yep, these ball throwers are saints. Except that I don’t want them any where near my daughters. Parents have enough of challenges bringing up their daughters. My wife and I spend a lot of time and money to do the best we can for them. We can certainly do with out that “little bit of inspiration” like that good man Mr.Costello said. We attack politicians 24/7 but when they do the right we should appreciate them.

    • Rob says:

      05:53pm | 21/02/11

      @ Hot Tub re the dropping of the age of consent to 16.Has it ever crossed your mind,some politician with morals could not wait for his girlfriend to turn 17?

    • hot tub political machine says:

      04:15pm | 23/02/11

      Rob,

      Not until now. Distrubing thought.

    • SPP says:

      09:10am | 21/02/11

      It seems Mr Nixon is part of the problem!

    • Nauseous says:

      09:12am | 21/02/11

      I just can’t believe that anyone would have sex with someone as ugly as Nixon. This girl will obviously have sex with anyone. Gross. How many STD’s have been shared amongst this group, and beyond ?

    • BK says:

      10:25am | 21/02/11

      For this girl, sex isn’t something to do for fun, it is a tool to get things, in this case revenge.

    • Jerr Maguire says:

      09:15am | 21/02/11

      Nixon came out during the Reiwoldt incident and publically launched a tirade against this girl more or less claiming that she was a lieing mentally deficient fatal atrraction-esque stalker…and then he goes and has a relationship with her? That’s dodgy.
      A seventeen year old living it up in a hotle paid for by the club? That’s hush money…and also dodgy.

      My thoughts are get rid of player managers, they are not needed and lead to the babying of sports stars. It’s no coincidence that the biggest off-season scandal in both the AFL and NRL has involved a player manager (NRL PM Sam Ayoub betting on that dodgy Bulldogs game).

      From an NRL persepective perhaps the most articulate, savvy players of recent years was Shane Webcke who now has a media career as well as numerous properties and endorsment deals whilst contributing to a number of good causes. Webcke’s manager throughout his career? Shane Webcke.

    • Tiger says:

      09:33am | 21/02/11

      Ricky Nixon is under the mistaken assumption he is a “footballer” by association. He is the human headline threatening to take Derryn Hinch’s title. “She who cannot be named” seems to be doing ok financially, but I’d hate to be in her headspace, even with a 30 year advantage. How come she is living in a hotel? Where’s the normality and reality in a life like that? What happens when she becomes of age and is identified?
      So many questions with answers unknown. Bad ending being scripted as we watch…

    • Opus says:

      09:38am | 21/02/11

      How many times can the AFL defend this pack of bogans and their sycophants.deregister them for bringing the game into disrepute,bunch of losers

    • richo says:

      09:41am | 21/02/11

      Ant you claim the girl is just looking for fame and wants to exploit these players (and managers) to further her ‘celebrity’. That’s all well and good, but if the players and mangers don’t go near her, if the players and mangers aren’t in contact, then what does she have to sell? She gets fame because they give it to her.

      She is clearly unstable, she clearly wanted revenge and yet they still don’t get the message! Unbelievable. I’m sorry, you can say what you want about her, but without the players and mangers stupid actions there is no her.

      She doesn’t deserve punishment as you say, she deserves to be left alone (by the AFL and the media as well) so she can deal with some obvious issues.

      Here is a guy that stated she was mentally unstable and still felt it appropriate to take advantage (allegedly). If he is not disbarred then the AFL (who’s silence is deafening by the way) will continue to be the greatest sporting joke for the next year or so.

    • Sam says:

      01:28pm | 21/02/11

      I agree Richo. The players and Nixon are far from the innocent victims they are trying to portray. If they treated this girl with an ounce of respect then this whole saga wouldnt be playing out.
      I wonder if this has served as a lesson for other players, treat your flings as scum and the wrath of a woman scorned will rain upon you.

    • Tim says:

      04:09pm | 21/02/11

      Sam,
      last time I looked being “treated badly”, if that’s what happened, isn’t an excuse for criminal behaviour.

    • Matt K says:

      10:04am | 21/02/11

      Typical boys club propaganda from blahwood.. Trying to sugar coat what is child abuse plain and simple. Obviously hoping his little display of solidarity now will help his “journalistic” career in the future. I’d be willing to bet he’d behave just the same as Nixon.

    • Tim the Toolman says:

      01:25pm | 22/02/11

      “Trying to sugar coat what is child abuse plain and simple.”

      I’m sure the actual victims of child abuse appreciate you completely misusing the term.  Well done.

    • Elizabeth says:

      10:07am | 21/02/11

      “Maybe’s he’s playing a meerkat in Madagascar 3 or some such.”

      Best line ever!

      The whole sad and sordid story is wrong and grubby and I feel sad for all involved.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:54am | 21/02/11

      From the document:

      “The AFL will ensure that complainants and
      witnesses are not victimised in any way”

      I would laugh if it didn’t make me see red. Andrew Demitriou put his name to that document - the same Andrew Demitriou who came out and publicly said he didn’t believe the girl but instead believed the club.

    • Sam says:

      01:35pm | 21/02/11

      ‘The AFL will ensure that complainants and
      witnesses are not victimised in any way’

      Obviously this is one of those documents you are meant to read but ends up in the bottom draw of the office desk never to be referenced again.

    • BK says:

      04:42pm | 21/02/11

      This case neatly illustrates everything that is wrong with the “don’t blame the victim” meme. Small brains might like to simplistically divide the world into victims and villians, but life is rarely that simple. This case defies simple moral judgements. Defending the players’doesn’t necessarily imply that she deserves all blame.

    • Aitch says:

      10:13am | 21/02/11

      He’s 47. She’s a 17 year old kid. She’s 30 years younger than him. She’s a child. He’ a ???

    • Glen says:

      10:44am | 21/02/11

      Not technically, but I see where you are going.

    • Golly Gosh says:

      09:14pm | 21/02/11

      You needed to put another ? to get the correct antonym.  But I agree !!!

    • Dan says:

      10:15am | 21/02/11

      I blame society. We are no longer united in our beliefs.
      Sad girl, sad man, SAD all around.

    • ??? says:

      10:17am | 21/02/11

      at first i thought she was an attention seeking skank. she still is, but she has some serious mental issues that need addressing. as for the ugly looking nixon character, he should be fired just for being an idiot. seriously, what is with these bogans and juvenile pu$$y

    • dig a says:

      11:31am | 21/02/11

      Time, perhaps, for an involuntary committal and compulsory psychiatric evaluation and treatment?

    • mary says:

      10:21am | 21/02/11

      Victoria’s child safety commissioner Bernie Geary said the league was failing the teen. ‘‘The AFL needs to understand that we’ve got a child here and we should be protecting the child not the boys’ club,’’ he said.

      ‘‘The community should have concerns for her welfare and her family should have concerns for her welfare … But the history is that the boys’ club, the footballers and the football clubs have all run for cover and blamed the child and I’m wondering this time around whether the girl will be blamed again.’‘


      No need to wonder any longer Bernie, yeah, they’re still blaming the child.

    • JRM says:

      10:23am | 21/02/11

      The only crime committed thus far is the fraud on the credit card. Let us ensure that is prosecuted.  The rest of the saga is just moral judgements.

      It sounds to me the girls retailiation Friday was for Nixon laying charges on Thursday. If Nixon was having sex with her - he wouldn’t mind paying an airfare I am sure.

    • richo says:

      10:44am | 21/02/11

      JRM, Nixon has admitted supplying her with alcohol, she is only 17. Supplying alcohol to a minor is a crime. He also had an intervention order out on her, which he broke, although I’m not sure you can be charged with breaking your own intervention order.

    • GB says:

      10:44am | 21/02/11

      The whole saga is just getting really sad now. Both the “girl who cannot be named” and Nixon are as bad as each other. Hopefully they both disappear for a while after this.

    • Rossco says:

      10:45am | 21/02/11

      Goodbye Ricky Nixon, dont come back. Goodbye little girl, dont come back either. Cant say your name because your legally protected. The book is going to be really interesting as a 40 second read when she can be identified and finally makes a bit of money out of all this. This whole saga is just that, a sad indictement on humanity and as previously stated, “of biblical proportions”. Ah, the things we do for money!. Oh, yeah, Ricky Nixon is not a footballer and was pretty crap when he was, so why do morons like him get to play such a big role in players lives?....money! i wish i had some.
      Little girl, here is a note: get some councelling, grow up, and try to have a happy life, with a few morals and once the book is published, youll be really famous. Thank goodness there is no other news at the moment.

    • Steven says:

      12:08pm | 21/02/11

      @Rossco I hope the culmination of this is a book as i fear the end of this story is much more tragic. This girl/child/woman seems to want attention and that means each story has to be more sensational than the last in order to get the attention she seems to crave. Most responders here who have read her blogs say she is mentally disturbed, meaning anything is possible from this person in order to achieve infamy…sadly for her sake i hope she is not pushed into the ultimate sacrifice for attention, suicide.
      No matter what your personal view of the people involved in this tryst is, i hope the media reporting on this and the responders across all media forums realise the fatal conclusion this tragic incident could culminate in.

    • farkurnell says:

      08:41pm | 21/02/11

      I can see a movie deal as well in a few years .Who’ll they get to play the dillusional unnamed girl -Nicole or Danni?

    • Tails says:

      10:55am | 21/02/11

      I thought the rule of thumb was “half your age plus seven”. She’s definitely not 30.

    • Bitten says:

      11:05am | 21/02/11

      She’s a child. Now, don’t get me wrong - she’s a complete douche and I wouldn’t want her anywhere near my daughters. But she is still a child and the others involved in this sordid fracas are all adults. It’s not possible to continue to gloss over that difference - child vs. adult. The adults should be capable of exercising greater restraint, maturity and intelligence than a child. That the girl was of the legal age of consent is an irrelevance - that merely means that the players didn’t commit a crime. It does not mean that what they did was morally defensible. A man, by virtue of the name, should be capable of making the better decision where an immature douche of a teenage girl offers herself sexually.

    • Tim says:

      12:54pm | 21/02/11

      “That the girl was of the legal age of consent is an irrelevance”
      Really? I think it’s the only pertinent piece of information in this whole saga.
      Unless you’re trying to say that people that are above the age of consent are in fact unable to give informed consent?
      As it stands, the law says different.
      Don’t like it or agree? Petition the government to have it changed.

    • al oakley says:

      11:22am | 21/02/11

      ricky. a shane warne you ain,t

    • Mark Young says:

      11:23am | 21/02/11

      Amazing how many commentors on this article that obviously made it through their teenaged years without a single mistake or error of judgement.

    • BK says:

      02:23pm | 21/02/11

      I never used anyone else’s credit card or posted naked photos of people on toilet walls (the 80s equivalent of facebook walls).  I did, however, have sex with an eighteen year old when I was in my mid twenties. I didn’t, however have photos of my mates naked. What was your point again?

    • Jugg says:

      11:27am | 21/02/11

      Are we saying now, that Managers are role models for the community as well now?

    • John C says:

      11:30am | 21/02/11

      Forget the legal age of consent. What about the moral issues. He is a 47 year old man involved in a sport that attracts fans, both enthusiastic and fanatic and which has an aura of glamour about it. She is a 17 year old girl (16) at the time and, whatever her morals, whatever her stupidity, whatever her wish for 15 minutes of fame, should not have been the subject of inappropriate behaviour or whatever he calls it. She was not fair game.

      And a 47 year old man and a 16 year old girl, a bit off surely.

      I am continually amazed that fans of a particular sport can be so rapid as to be unable to recognise unacceptable behaviour. If they do recognise it and seek to defend it, worse still.

    • Mike T says:

      11:30am | 21/02/11

      My only problem with the title of this article is that the terms sad and grubby are not used for both parties involved. I have no doubt that “youth” will give you some leway when you are handing out blame, but this girl has been nothing short of disgusting. And by making this point im not excusing the actions of the player manager, im simplying pointing the finger equally at her which the media seem to be relutant to do.

      This girl has behaved awfully and seems only to be motivated by damaging others. She may be only 17 but i dont think the word sadistic is fiting.

    • Paddywhack says:

      11:42am | 21/02/11

      With her obvious ability to plan, strategise and execute I would have thought she is an ideal person for the ALP to recruit??

    • Greg says:

      12:29pm | 21/02/11

      People her who are blaming the girl for all this are just fanbois of the AFL.
      Without the involvement and subsequent treatment of her by the players/St Kilda/Nixon, none of this would have occurred. A disgraceful effort by what are meant to be grown men.

    • Sam says:

      01:08pm | 21/02/11

      I agree.
      Although maybe she has magical powers that renders these poor men helpless in her presence.

    • Rose says:

      09:37pm | 21/02/11

      “They’re called boobs Ed”

    • Foxy says:

      12:39pm | 21/02/11

      I’m sorry but this whole sorry saga could have been avoided if the player in question decided against having sex with a 16 year old….repeat….16 year old. Seriously, what good did he think would come out of it?!

      Haha! What a loser!

    • Squeaky says:

      02:41pm | 21/02/11

      This saga could also have been avoided if females stopped opening their legs for each and every footballer they meet.

    • who cares says:

      12:47pm | 21/02/11

      A garbage story about the trashy p[eople associated with a rubbish game. AFL is passed it’s use by date and will eventually be replaced by international codes.

    • MarK says:

      12:54pm | 21/02/11

      The saga continues.

      Does anyone think it surreal that the authorities are allowing St Kilda to pay for the girl to stay in a hotel?

      What we have here is a deeply troubled teen. She has issues and they are big. What genius thought that to put her in an artificial world of hotel living would have a positive effect on her?

      A few other thoughts;

      Nixon is a predator. Spin it anyway you like. Inappropriate can be whatever you think it is. Any dealings with this girl is beyond the pale for a man his age in private, in a hotel room.

      How did she get his credit card? I know I usually do not either

      1. Take off my pants when in a hotel room of a girl I don’t really know so she can access my wallet while I am errrrr….previously engaged
      2. Put my wallet on the sideboard while I do something else
      3. Allow people I do not know,unlike those I am afraid of like my wife, to touch my wallet

      I really cannot believe this.

      Here we have been having a raging debate filled with partisan calls about boat people and the rights of kids that have turned up “irregularly” on our shores. Calls for compassion and humanitarian appeasement are being shouted from the rooftops. Staff writers at The Punch hoe into the right if it dares discuss what is a valid issue. The bile is not restrained.

      Where are the calls for help for this poor kid that at 17 is now so screwed up I shudder to think of what she will do in future? It is macabre. It is stupid. It is hypocritical.

      Wake up. This is appalling behaviour by all concerned. It must stop. We are so ready to jump on the state of mental health of “kids” and others in detention….thousands of them thanks to Labor’s failed policy…..but when faced with an obviously mentally ill kid that is one “of ours” it is easy to say pffft, skank, keep the legs together you are not a victim. It is all her cunning plan to make a quid.

      Whatever sells and is ideologically sound for you I guess.

    • greg says:

      01:53pm | 21/02/11

      Extremely well put.
      When people like St Kilda Nixon etc come out all guns blazing and attack what is essentially a kid, there is more trouble behind the scene that is known

    • hot tub political machine says:

      02:21pm | 21/02/11

      Yup, something stinks very badly. When someone is willing to attack a school girl - they must be highly motivated. I wonder why?

    • Tim says:

      04:17pm | 21/02/11

      Hot Tub,
      so you wouldn’t be highly motivated if someone was deliberately and vindictively trying to ruin your career?
      Being a schoolgirl has just given her cover from real scrutiny by people like yourself who foolishly perpetuate a victim mentality and excuse any bad behaviour she may exhibit.

    • Alan K says:

      01:07pm | 21/02/11

      The one thing is, when it all hit the fan with the St Kilda pics. who was telling the truth and who was not? Is this another step in her ladder to “fame” and Nixon was just the stepping stone? If this comes out as lies as well, then there needs to be something done, after all it is nothing more than blackmail and extortion. However on the otherside of the fence if Nixon was at fault he needs to be repremanded and dealt with appropriately. I do not feel he should lose his management accreditation though, but maybe have a probation period placed against his name.

    • james says:

      01:52pm | 21/02/11

      I cannot believe that people are denigrating this girl about a possible mental health disorder and think that is ok.  disgusting!
      Adults be they footballers or their agents should not be cavourting with school girls full stop!!
      football clinics are held at schools for legitimate reasons and not for those attending to pick up.
      These guys should no better!
      We can argue till the cows come home about the girl’s motives and some may call these footballers victims, but they put themselves into the situation and these are the consequences and abviously are more magnified when in the public eye.
      i dont begrudge footballers enjoying themselves, especially if they find themselves single and receiving attention.  But they need to behave in a way that shows respect for others and themselves. 
      The footy culture appears to value the bond between the boys far beyond the treatment of women.  i suspect the lack of respect for women exercised by some men in this field could be masking an inner desire which dare not mention its name in such a macho environment, and whilst this may be a tough thing for those involved, it is no excuse.

    • Les says:

      03:34pm | 21/02/11

      Certainly inappropriate behaviour by Nixon, but I am sick of ready everyones names EXCEPT ‘the girls’. She knew what she was doing was wrong, she lied about the pics she *didn’t* take, and she is probaly not being honest with her current statements. Seems things have died down a bit, so she opens up another chapter to keep her in the limelight perhaps ?

    • Golly Gosh says:

      08:57pm | 21/02/11

      Grow up and have some respect for the protection of cxhildren and of those that have mental issues as she clearly does !!!!

    • Greg says:

      03:55pm | 21/02/11

      This artcile is a disgrace. St Kilda is a disgrace, the AFL is a disgrace - YOU are all adults, she is a messed up teenager. 16 when this started….16!

      Nothing, none of your vacant words, none of your excuses, no attempts to put this under the blokes rung, can sidestep this.

      Where is the LAW in this? Where are those who are supposed to protect young people? I have a 15 year old daughter, and I swear these “men” would wake up in a hospitral bed if they did this to her - NO EXCUSES. Old men, young kid=baseball bat by Dad.

      Australia, still a redneck wonderland, all these years later.

    • Pat says:

      05:26pm | 21/02/11

      Greg, you have put into words what many many fathers are leaving unsaid.

    • kim says:

      06:09pm | 21/02/11

      whats really disgraceful is that she has lied numerous times, and keeps trying to blackmail and manipulate a number of adults.

      She was frequenting nightclubs at 16 so naturally people there would have thought that she was 18. 

      if your daughter was out nightclubbing and having sex with a number of footy players and uploading nude pics of guys to the internet etc you would place the blame on the footy players instead of the behaviour of your daughter?  Wake up!

      Don’t you wonder why her parents have disowned her?

    • Z says:

      12:07am | 22/02/11

      Sorry dad but 16 is the legal age to have sexual relations - that’s where the law is.  Just as well you never looked at a Playboy when growing up, as the owner is in his 80’s and sleeps with 19 year olds.
      Female in this case had a facebook page stating her age as 19, when she was 16.
      Get off your high horse Greg.

    • mary says:

      11:13am | 22/02/11

      Thank you Greg.
      To all those who think that the child is to blame, thank you so much for so clearly explaining why our society is in the dreadful mess it is.

      We must always blame the children, never the married guys, after all how could they resist a teenager? We must always let the married guys and other inappropriate bogans who ply our youngsters with drugs/drink/power off. Let’s never blame the married guys but always blame the vulnerable and impressionable young ones in our society.

      What is everyone thinking? We’re talking about a kid here.

    • JohnF says:

      04:11pm | 21/02/11

      Moral and legal judgments aside, the girl, the players and the agent all have one thing in common—dumb, dumb, dumb. I have no respect or pity for any of them. It has nothing to do with education or “class”.  It’s not hard to live a ‘smart’ life, whatever your station.  You can have a ball, enjoy yourself to the fullest…smartly.  Sure, the kid’s upbringing may be to blame. Smart parents bring up their kids to be smart.  But she shows no signs of learning her lesson.  I don’t care what happens to her. The players and the agent haven’t learned either, even though they’ve had longer.  I don’t care about them, either.

    • antiCHRIST says:

      05:32pm | 21/02/11

      remember when the sports pages reported what happened on the field? i dont. as long as the public remain interested in the off field dribble pushed by the media there is no escaping this sort of scandal. sadly this can be said of all “celebrites”, sporting or otherwise. gossip in the paper, or magazines, which are thrust under our noses at every opportunity will continue to overshadow real news issues as long as the public are interested in them. real issues continue to take a backseat to this kind of “journalism” because of our insatiable appetite for rumour and gossip. i for one have had a gutfull of “news” items which pander to the general publics desire to intimately know the ins and outs of the social lives of people who are elevated to godlike status in our society, based purely on their ability to market products none of us need. if we all ignore this crap, maybe people will read about something that matters, instead of trawling the newstands for the best scandal available at the time. when we get down to the nuts and bolts, shes an adult, they re all adults, and despite how unsavory the whole situation is, it means nothing to the day to day of anyones lives, except those involved. if only the public could ignore this trash, we d all be alot better off.

    • Ferdinand says:

      07:28pm | 21/02/11

      Where there is smoke, there is also fire. Every one involved in this unholy mess, even in the higher echelons, has something to answer for.  Stop spewing more filth. It gives very good example for our youth.

    • Golly Gosh says:

      07:29pm | 21/02/11

      Having any one of you that have made lewd comments re this young girl even considered the depraved disrespect these men have for a female.  Stick all the tags you want on this child but make sure you wear one on your own forehead that clearly states ‘any female is fair game for sex drugs and rock and roll.  Who cares if they are mentally impaired, so are we’.

    • farkurnell says:

      08:51pm | 21/02/11

      Gee Golly I missed the Rock N Roll in this story.I guess the Book and Movie ,down the track ,can be named :Sex Drugs & AFL

    • nix says:

      09:27am | 22/02/11

      golly - you really are out of touch..

      If you believe she was fair game and didnt put herself out there expecting something to come of it only to find out she was just another groupie then you are just as bigger fool as she is, but what is worse you are obviously over 18 and still living in a deluded world that all women are innocent and all men are guilty. its More like sour grapes.

      But mentally impaired i am starting to believe after reading your comments and replies you must be the one impaired and god i really hope you dont have daughters.. cause nieve they will be.

    • blah says:

      08:03pm | 21/02/11

      well once this girl is 18. which wont be very long - she will have herself on every so called current affairs programs or 60 minutes - just wait - you’ll see… she is already a media junkie, desperate for attention…but she is also a victim of the big business that is sport and all the men that exist within it….she is an unsavoury result of too many young men being paid too much money and too much attention with all the fat cats around them trying to make more money out of what shouldnt be a business but just a sport….

    • Grandmother says:

      08:49pm | 21/02/11

      this whole story is sad…silly, trashy, attractive, attention seeking good time girl, a series of testosterone laden young mean and a sad middle aged man…just pay her off, shut her down and learn some lessons everyone…and by the way, I was a mother two days after eighteen…and I certainly knew what I was doing…and Ricky?...haven’t you heard the expression “no fool like an old fool”..

    • Golly Gosh says:

      09:11pm | 21/02/11

      Glad you are not a ‘grandmother’ to my children.  How about some lessons on respecting females and protecting the innocence of the young.  Most of all, how about not taking advantage of the mentally impaired, as she clearly is.  Her parents have apparently ‘disowned’ her.  I suspect they did that many years ago when she was in desperate need of their love and care.

    • Bangkok Drama says:

      10:55pm | 21/02/11

      Wholeheartedly agree with that Grandmother….but where are the parents?She is still only 16. This ‘soap opera’ has to be smacked from both sides for the education of the comers’ up.

    • nix says:

      08:20am | 22/02/11

      Golly Gosh - this girl should respect herself which she clearly doesnt,  when are girls going to learn it is not up the everyone how they treat us but how we treat ourself, as a female myself i know i didnt get my kit off for every tom dick and harry.. take some responsibility for your own actions she new exactly what she was doing. As for mentally impaired that she is not.. spiteful and childish maybe.

      She is an attention seeker who doesnt care who she takes down with her as long as she is getting attention. as for her parents agreed you shouldnt desert your children but if she is doing this now i can only imagine what she was up to before this..

    • BundyGil says:

      09:20pm | 21/02/11

      She’s estranged from her parents, so she won’t be grounded until she ends up in jail.

    • Beck says:

      10:24pm | 21/02/11

      I worked for a football club for 4 years (mind u 15 years ago) and I will say boys will be boys, but believe me girls will be girls, I know of some girls 18 to 21 who slept with whole teams ours and other teams and everyone knew about it… I had a partner and I can say that not one of the boys were ever inappropriate with me and treated me with utmost respect (and yes I am a very attractive female especially back then) but those same boys were so horrible to the girls that slept with everyone… This girl asks for attention and gets it… I feel very sorry for her as I know there are issues there but you reap what u sow… and where the hell are her parents!!!!!!! I would be murdered by mine by now if I acted like she has.

    • Moggy says:

      11:48pm | 21/02/11

      I wonder if the girl put a paper bag over this blokes head because he sure as hell is no competition for any AFL player…or rugby player for that matter!!

    • Tony says:

      12:56am | 22/02/11

      I’m not excusing the players or Nixon…there are no victims here and stupidity all round. But thank god for the first article squaring it at this girl. How destructive can one individual be? I think all parties in this need to be admonished but it seems 99% of media protects her and hoes into the players and Nixon. It’s a bout time this girl is also put under the scrutiny for her actions…a whole lot of pain all round for no gain is all i see.

    • Teary ending is near says:

      06:11am | 22/02/11

      Fact: players went to her school when she was 16. She met them along with 500 or so other kids at her school. The sexual encounter was not from this meeting.
      Fact or fiction? Was she really pregnant? Have medical records surfaced to prove she was.
      Fact: players slept with her breaking the AFL rules of having sex with an U18
      Fiction: She did not take photos of Nick Reiwoldt
      Fact: Nixon is a goose
      Fact: If the AFL does not want any more attention from this girl do not give it to her. She has a lawyer and all dealings should go through them.
      Fact: Bias reporting
      Fact: 16 is of legal age of sexual consent
      Fact: She still is legally classed as a child and is protected by child laws, U18, as her name can not be given out through media.
      Fact: Her parents can’t legally control her
      Fiction: St Kilda are saints
      Fact: The plot gets thicker everyday
      Fiction: It will have a fairytale ending

    • Moggy says:

      10:38am | 22/02/11

      Agree with you on all counts. What astonishes me is just how these blokes allow their “magic joy sticks” to take over running the show from their brains. The AFL is fast taking over the Rugby Leagues for moronic neanderthal behaviour.

    • mary says:

      07:45am | 22/02/11

      Egg all over your face Ant.

    • NicStar says:

      07:48am | 22/02/11

      Seems to me while these players defintley need to grow up and clean there act up. while it may be AFL code not to have sex with under 18’s, Our laws state 16. Yes i agree these men / boys need to grow up.

      What i want to know is where is this girls self respect, it appears to me that she is quiet happy to get her gear off for a number of men. It hink it is pathetic we are dragging these players through the mud but she is the “victim” i think not..  Personally i think this girl didnt get what she wanted to be a WAG obviously and now she is going to make hell to pay.. not realising how much trash she looks like.

      These men are fools for doing what they have done.. but i am ashamed of this girl. Have some respect for yoursel.

    • lurrviing the lobrau says:

      08:27am | 22/02/11

      Fat middle aged man calling himself Ricky - there’s the real crime

    • Mark says:

      01:27pm | 22/02/11

      “remember when the sports pages reported what happened on the field? i dont. ” - spot on with that comment. I cant take AFL seriously as a sport anymore. It has morphed into some trashy hybrid of Jerry Springer and Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous. Its quickly becoming a joke. I think a good share of the blame lies with the sycophantic sports media that have pumped it up to some gargatuan size that cannot be sustained. The sport has got as big as it can get - face facts.  There are more weekly AFL shows on TV during the season then Premier League Shows in England (with 60 million people) - Can anyone spell overexposure?. With all the hype it is easy to forget that the majority of the whole AFL industry is restricted to one City - and the other major powerbases are the two smallest capital cities. It is also easy to lose the fact amongst the weekly hype - that no its not a World Cup or Olympics sized event - its North Melbourne vs Port Power - not huge global icons - just that bloke your brother used to play with. No wonder then that all this sex/drugs dribble dominates the media - its got to fill page after page and show after show. Its time for the AFL to take a deep breath and get back to basics and reality or the curtain will begin to open and the wizard of Oz will be revealed to be pretty ordinary. I attend all types of sports and the AFL crowds are on average far older than that of other sports. Generational change occurs and this “born to rule” AFL arrogance could come back to haunt them in the future. Pretty sure kids wont want to be associated with the white trash bogan image that the sport is generating.

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      01:36pm | 22/02/11

      This young woman is no “Victim”. She is just that a young woman. She would be furious if she was referred to as a “Child”. If she were just that then it should be illegal for anyone to have sex with her until she was 18. No-one, male or female, can be logically be regarded as a “Child” if they are legally allowed to have sex with anyone they want at the age of 16. The morons who set these age limits were/are just that: Morons. They set the Age of Consent at 16 years. They then, inanely, set the Age of Maturity at 18 years. If at 16 a person is considered mature enough to have sex then they should no longer be regarded as a Child.
      As for the so-called high profile manager of AFL well for God’s sake this man is 47 years old! With stupid behaviour like his, and we all know what everyone is thinking was to the real reason he went to her motel room, it is no wonder that those he is supposed to be managing behave as they do.
      British Comedian, Katherine Tate, had a wonderful & screamingly funny TV series: “The Katherine Tate Show”. One of her characters was a foul-mouthed, dirty-minded Grandmother, who made her grandson’s life a living hell & was constantly questioning his sexuality. One of Grannie’s favourite expressions was “What a F!@#$%g Moron” an epithet which should, indeed must, be applied to this Ricky (presumably his adult name is Richard or is that shortened to “Dick”) Nixon. What is it with people with the name Richard Nixon that they bring disgrace upon themsleves? Remember that Yank tosser? Now we have our very own Australian tosser to match.
      No matter how many protestations by, as “lurrviing the lobrau” says, this fat (late) middle-aged man (still) calling himself Ricky makes as to the propriety of his making a clandestine visit to this 17 year-old’s bedroom no-one will believe him.
      It’s is time Richard grew up, and, if he has any left after this, makes sure those who pay him, very handsomely, to manage them do the same.
      At least they can blame their indiscretions on their youth.
      The ageing Richard Nixon cannot.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter