Taxpayers deserve to know what they’re forking out to sporting stars.

In South Australia, Premier Mike Rann - despite his reputation as a master of spin - has made a poor judgment when it comes to not disclosing how much Lance Armstrong is paid to appear at the Tour Down Under.

The State Government has continually refused to say how much it has paid the seven-time Tour de France winner to appear at the TDU, even claiming the information was commercial in confidence, thus putting the details out of the reach of freedom of information requests.

The argument has also been made that divulging the amount the state spends on the event would give other states leverage to poach Lance, and the TDU from SA.

But the refusal to say what Armstrong has been paid has guaranteed years of speculation and bad press.

In contrast, divulging it, and proudly, would have led to a modest amount of publicity, and allowed the government, as it already does, to argue that it is money well spent.

The knockers will always have a crack at a government which pays a multi-millionaire sports star to appear at an event.

And let’s face it - it does stick in the craw.

Here’s a rich individual who is being paid simply to turn up, on the back of (let’s face it) a well-earned reputation.

Arguments on forums such as The Advertiser‘s website AdelaideNow always devolve rapidly to calls for the money to be spent on hospitals or policing - an argument which would have governments spending nothing at all on anything frivolous such as tourism promotion or Australia Day fireworks if we take them to their logical conclusions.

But the fact is that whatever the government has spent on bringing Armstrong to SA (and it’s rumoured to be about $2 million) is money well spent.

While it has a growing profile in Australia, professional cycling is huge in Europe and largely thanks to Lance Armstrong’s achievements, has a healthy following in the US also. Even people who are not cycling fans will follow his exploits because of his heroic recovery from cancer and his record Tour de France achievements, as well as his ongoing efforts to raise money for cancer research.

His appearances in the TDU represent his return to, and retirement from, the world of international cycle racing, following his earlier retirement after his last Tour de France.

While the increase cannot solely be contributed to Armstrong’s appearance, the number of international riders competing in the community challenge in which amateur riders get to ride the TDU race course has jumped from 717 in 2008 to 2426 last year. The economic impact has jumped from $17.3 million to $41.5 million from 2008 to 2010.

And the number of international journalists travelling to SA to document Lance’s milestones has ballooned, bringing the race, and the state, to the world’s attention.

The race’s profile has also continued to grow, with this year’s line-up packed with some of the best riders in the world.

So why not divulge the fee, and challenge the knockers, and your political opponents, to argue that it was a waste of money?

Governments on the east coast have not been reluctant to say how much they are investing in bringing stars to Australia.

Shipping Oprah Winfrey and a studio full of American viewers to our shores cost a pretty penny - $3 million through Tourism Australia, which was made up of equal contributions from the Federal and New South Wales Governments.

Contributions from other states and the wage costs of the public servants who helped make it happen would have added up to millions more.

The outcome - according to an editorial in the Daily Telegraph last month an early estimate was a 35-fold return on investment.

Tiger Woods was paid $3 million by the Victorian Government to appear at the Australian Masters in November.

He was there to defend his title, which was the last one he won before the scandal surrounding his string of extra-marital affairs wrecked his marriage and knocked him out of golf while he dealt with the fall-out.

His return to the Masters was a compelling tale of a fallen hero attempting to make amends publicity gold.

While the Brumby Government argued it had to pay appearance fees to stop major events being poached by New South wales, that’s only part of the picture.

It’s just as easy for stars to be poached by other nations if the price tag is right.

Australia is fighting an uphill battle when it comes to winning the hearts of international tourists, with our strong dollar dealing travel operators a tough hand.

Governments which are spending millions on promotion, and getting measurable returns which justify that expense, should stand up, and (excuse the pun) be counted.

Most commented

39 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • BrewsterMac says:

      07:53am | 19/01/11

      Not a very suitable name to have promoting a cycling event is it Mr Rann.

    • C1 says:

      08:16am | 19/01/11

      I do not doubt more money was spent on Lance than we think. Again if value is produced (like Toger and Oprah) then i do not have an issue with it -Just don’t try and hide it.

      I was coming back from overseas several years ago and I was reading a magazine in an airport lounge about Lance Armstrong. The interviewer wrote that half way through the chat, Lance had to take a call from Australia. When he returned apologising for the interruption he said that it was part of them getting more money to appear at a bike race.

      It is funny how things arise from different angles.

    • Dave says:

      08:25am | 19/01/11

      The Rann Government is a master at hiding the truth about what they pay people. Just look at how they have changed consultants into contractors thus hiding their real cost to the SA taxpayer!!!

    • Shane says:

      08:28am | 19/01/11

      Drug Cheat. No ‘ifs’, no ‘buts’. Lance is a drug cheat.

    • RT says:

      09:45am | 19/01/11

      Look, he probably is, but then again a lot of sports stars use performance enhancing drugs.

      Personally I’m still waiting for the day/Olympics where there are no drug tests. Let the athletes take whatever they want and see what the human body can do with the right fuel.

      Of course they will need to sign a waiver in the event they kill themselves as a result of what they take…

    • Jack Thomas says:

      10:09am | 19/01/11

      Don’t let one skerrick of proof get in the way of your argument Shane.

      No proof whatsover. Or is there a secret test you carried out in your own lab mate?

      Personally I have my doubts, and love the Pharmstrong nickname, but to have just the one positive test (which was as a result of a cream for saddle sores, post his cancer treatment) in his career says something. On that basis alone, you have to give him the benefit of doubt and innocent until proven guilty (and he has been tested a lot). 

      You sound as irrational and without credibility as Floyd Landis, the main one targetting Lance.

      And if so, so what?

      Whilst this guy is very wealthy, he has benefitted the lives of millions of cancer sufferers.

      How many little kids on chemo have you visited today Shane?

    • Bob h says:

      10:09am | 19/01/11

      Of course he’s a drug cheat, he’s a professional cyclist isn’t he?  i am sure you can’t be that naive to think any pro pedaler is clean.  Its a very dirty sport and always has been.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      12:10pm | 19/01/11

      Is there a limit to your stupidity Bob, or are you just taking us on a ride to infinity in your bottomless chasm of dum?

      Jack Borbidge just won our national road titles in Ballarat in one of the most awesome rides seen for many years. Clean as a whistle, smart as a whip, and a great future sports star for Australia. But he’s not Ben Cousins or ... (insert latest NRL player to be charged with drugs/sexual violence), so you will never know his name…

      Spoken like the true ill informed (and ill at ease) that you seem to be.

      Suggest you get back to calling in to your favourite radio shock jock about something else you know nothing about.

    • Nick says:

      01:07pm | 19/01/11

      I don’t know Jack, the evidence of EPO use during the 1999 TDF is pretty compelling based on retrotesting by LNDD.  But this is a discussion topic that has been flogged to death in a million forums already.  Armstrong has refused to let the relevant samples be formally retested, and he has stated his reasons for that, so maybe we’ll never know.

      And if so,so what?...well dopers steal the careers and income of other people is so what.

      Sure, he’s raised money for cancer.  Bernie Madoff gave millions to charity too but he’s still in jail for fraud.  Ask his victims if they think his charitable acts excuse his theft of their money.  Is Armstrong a Bernie Madoff?  No, but it is a furphy to raise charitable acts as a defence for doping.  And very uncharitable to use them to attack people who aren’t visiting kids on chemo on a daily basis…after all, most of us have close friends and relatives who have died from cancer.

    • Bob H says:

      01:15pm | 19/01/11

      @Jack Thomas - Drugs cheats are always ahead of the testing regime.  I admire your faith, but not your inability to keep calm.  Cycling is a great sport but has a history of developing “dosing up” techniques.  Your rabid response may indicate you took a little to many off season steroids, you can test clean but the effects linger.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      03:03pm | 19/01/11

      @Nick

      Nice piece of irony there mate with “very uncharitable to use them to attack people who aren’t visiting kids on chemo on a daily basis…”

      Because charity is exactly what he’s not getting from any of the “why? just because” arguers here, and charity is probably the main reason why I’d defend the bloke. Personally, my cycling heroes are as riddled and flawed as any you’ll find. Cipo and Djemoladine Anbdujaparov for example. 

      Putting up Bernie Madoff as an example then running in the opposite direction is hardly a good argument either. “Well Hitler played sport too, errr but except he’s not as bad as Hitler…” Yep, nice one.

      Madoff ripped off lots of rich people who were actually too stupid to check what they were investing in.

      Lance Armstrong is a cyclist who won 7 TdF’s. At a stretch, and even then if you could find any evidence (ie. a test) that he’d cheated, he’s cruelled the dreams of fellow professional cyclists, like Ullrich, Pantani, Basso, etc. Hmmm.

      “Sure, he’s raised money for cancer.”

      By that do you mean his Armstong Foundation raising USD$325m from just the sale of those yellow rubber bracelets. The Armstrong Foundation is one of the top 10 funders of cancer research in the USA.

      That’s more justification than the glib response you give it.

      Doesn’t stop the cheap pot shots from the idiot brigade though.

      If he can raise the hope and dreams of cancer sufferers, making their lives better for any amount of time, by what he does then I’ll support him in that. Where’s the harm?

      Unsubstantiated and jealous rants about Armstrong I disagree with though.

    • Shane says:

      03:07pm | 19/01/11

      Any sport where the athlete does the same repetitive action over and over again is bound to be rife with drugs. Athletics, swimming, cyclcing, baseball, tennis (big servers only). The cheats are one step ahead of the testers all the time. That’s why a lot of dirty washing will come out in years to come when they retest blood taken at the 2008 games. I look forward to it.

      Sports like soccer, AFL, basketball, hockey… these ones will be relatively clean (Not clean, mind you, but relatively clean) since things like HGH are used at the expense of agility and flexibility.

      But make no mistake, in cycling you would be hard pressed to find anyone not on drugs. Lance included.

    • Nick says:

      08:48pm | 19/01/11

      Funny how these forums are such a magnet for angry men….

      I’d say you are conflating two issues Jack, I know it’s a bit complex for you but most of us can hold two opinions - one on doping and the other on fund raising.  I do think you should do some homework on the less wealthy of Madoff’s victims though…just for perspective you know.  People like kids with cancer for example since they’re such a favourite of yours…

    • Jack Thomas says:

      10:13pm | 19/01/11

      Funny Shane, because having direct contact with several Aussie cyclists and being at A grade club level, while also a family member at an AFL club, my knowledge is far different from your opinions.

      AFL players rookie listed are well versed in the right gear to take, how ineffective AFL drug testing is, and even full of old wife’s tales about the Charlie and E’s they take can ‘wash out’ through hair cuts, etc.. West Coast Eagles steroidal monsters of the 90’s anyone? Even Dermie’s tried to get EPO at one stage (muppet). I haven’t even looked at the power sports of League and Union.

      Name an Aussie cyclist you thinks on the gear anyway Einstein? One.

    • TChong says:

      09:35am | 19/01/11

      Sports seems to be one of the most enduring gravy trains.
      Govts of all hues pay for sports “stars"to appear, or help subsidise the infrastrucute and/ or event.
      Taxpayers fork out for those attending the AIS. No HECS for them, regardless of subsequnt earings - if only such generosity was given to everyone else.
      Maybe its our cultural heritage , with its stirring imagery of Phar Lap, The Don, Dawn, Americas Cup win etc and the patriotism that goes with it,  that allows sport such a free kick , in the arena of public money for entertainment - which is all any sport really is.

    • TChong says:

      10:24am | 19/01/11

      “earings” with diamonds or gold are dead- set give away to how well the athlete is doing. I meant “earnings”.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      02:04pm | 19/01/11

      Not maybe TChong.

      Australia has a proud (and great) history of sport in our culture. You should look it up, because you don’t seem to know it very well.

      Look out the window and you might see people who….play sport. Literally millions of Aussies out there running, swimming, throwing a ball, and watching it. Stunning huh? Some choose physical activity, enjoy it, and happily pay to play and watch it. What’s wrong with that?

      You mentioned Phar Lap, the Don, etc. who were sporting heroes, who were world class, achieved a lot, all those gave a lot back. Phar Lap even gave hope and enjoyment to millions of Aussies living through hard times. What’s wrong with that?

      Even a yacht winning a meaningless race helped engender pride in average Aussies. What’s wrong with that?

      These days it’s simple economics, again you should look it up. Spend $3m to get $20m back.

      If your point is AIS scholarships should be paid back like HECS, then say it. I agree. If it’s your view that taxpayer funds spent on sport is a waste, then say it. I disagree.

      Say it. Just stop mincing around, ok.

    • RobJ says:

      02:45pm | 19/01/11

      “Australia has a proud (and great) history of sport in our culture.”

      So what you’re saying is that Australia has trivial priorities?

      “all those gave a lot back.”

      Phaar Lap was a hose not in a position to give anything back. Remind us, what did Bradman give back?

      “Even a yacht winning a meaningless race helped engender pride in average Aussies. What’s wrong with that? “

      Nothing wrong with it at all… Nothing great about it either in my opinion. Seriously I like sport but I really don’t care who wins or loses, I want a spectacle. It is importnat, life would be grim without entertainment but I don’t see it as the be all and end all and feel that Aussies put too much stock in it.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      10:02pm | 19/01/11

      Intellectual snobbery at its best Rob. Trivial because it makes you feel better at your next inner city dinner party to rail against the injustices of ...of… Oh damn, at least you’re not like those awful bogan types cheering at whatever sporting event.

      Check your history mate, that Kiwi nag Phar Lap had hundreds of thousands turning out in the Depression. Sir Don gave heaps back as a politician and selector. Very unfashionable though he wad, being a white Aussie male with a family etc.

      Who said sport was the be all and end all here? $2m at most for Lance, while that is hardly the travel bill for KRudd each year, or 1/1,000th the losses on Labor’s silly Green Loans/pink batts etc schemes.

      Do you not understand that this is not a mutually exclusive thing here?

      Back in the topic of sportspeople being paid good money though, that argument was lost back at Uni when you first realized your pissweak Arts degree would at best give you a job in retail service. Get over it.

    • RobJ says:

      01:31pm | 20/01/11

      “rivial because it makes you feel better at your next inner city dinner party to rail against the injustices of ...of… Oh damn, at least you’re not like those awful bogan types cheering at whatever sporting event.”

      Great an ad hominem attack.. Completely wrong so why make such ridiculous assumptions? You’re not very good at debating are you.

      “Sir Don gave heaps back as a politician and selector.”

      Expand, I’ve heard otherwise from people who knew him far better than I suspect you did? Nah don’t bother, we’ll just agree to disagree.

      “that argument was lost back at Uni when you first realized your pissweak Arts degree would at best give you a job in retail service. Get over it. “

      I think you have me confused with someone else because I don’t have an arts degree, my qualifications are in mechanical engineering though I work as a systems administrator.

      I don’t think I’ll bother with you any more considering you just make things up as you go along. Have a nice day. (and try and relax a little wink )

    • RobJ says:

      09:46am | 19/01/11

      Shane is a drug cheat, no ifs, no buts, no evidence whatsoever, he just is!

    • Jack Thomas says:

      09:53am | 19/01/11

      The Victorian Government claimed $19m was generated by paying Tiger Woods $3m to come here, which is debatable. Put simply, they included any $ spent on the same golf tournament, but then again they probably didn’t factor in Tiger’s spending on the laydees..

      Without doubt, the $1m or whatever they are paying Lance is well spent.

      The reason why not may be due to the actual payment may not be straight forward (which is probably even worse..). The cheque may not be made out to Mr. Lance Armstrong for example, but rather ‘Pharmstrong’s Fight Against US Prosecutors Drug Investigation Inc.’. I guess it’s too much to expect a journo to actually investigate something like that so we’ll never know…

      As a cycling fan, stuck in Melbourne, I have been watching droves of my fellow riders head over there with much jealousy. The touring cyclist demographic these days is largely a well-spending, sophisticated, educated one. If I was harsh, I’d say it’s lots of business types with fat guts on $10k Pinarello’s drinking expensive wine and clogging up our cafes. These guys love Lance. They also spend good $, which I am sure Adelaidians will enjoy (I mean, why the hell would you/these people otherwise be going to Adelaide anyway?!). Lance, who is the face of cancer charity and a 7 time winner of the one bike race everyone seems to know, and did so without any positive drug tests. He’s the one cyclist everyone outside of cycling knows. Why he is not a ‘suitable name’ Brewster fails to say.

      Internationally, the world cycling press has been giving the TDU race more coverage than ever. Right now in cycling there is nothing going on, although it is a large sport in Europe the only media they have been featuring is the odd cyclo cross race in snow drifts and a training camp.

      They are loving the ready made tourism commercial of SA, I can assure you.

      Your issue is not the race, it is a dodgy Premier. Don’t cut off your nose here…

    • Mr Pod says:

      03:24pm | 19/01/11

      Cycling is a marginal sport, sure, many people cycle but not many have any interest in it as a sport.  As for Legend Lance being here, Rann gets to hob nob with his hero at the taxpayers pocket, but you don’t get rich selling coffee and croissants to portly leotarded business types from Melbourne.

    • Ross says:

      09:58am | 19/01/11

      If there was nothing to hide they wouldn’t, I fear any Government who will hide this type of expence as it is us who pay for it. Not the Government.Who else is being payed to make this hopeless lot look good

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      10:07am | 19/01/11

      Why do we pay that much to get a drug abuser into the country when George Michael will do it for a bag of ice, a bag of pot and a date with a puerto rican pool boy? This government has to get organised.

    • Nick says:

      10:09am | 19/01/11

      It’s partly the effect of the Lance circus, but much of the growth is because the race has finally been given pro-tour status, which means that the leading teams are required to field a team.  With Armstrong et al under such a heavy cloud due to doping investigations, and he being everything but retired I would say coverage has actually been fairly muted.  Last year’s comeback ride was good value though.

      On the substance of the article - yes, it always seems a bit crazy when politicians try to hide something trivial rather than justify it because all it does is give their opponents a dirty great big new stick to flog them with (Apologies to Mr Abbott).  In essence what it means is that the politician feels unable to justify the amount spent.  The commercial-in-confidence claim seems particularly strange because I am sure that Armstrong isn’t too coy about the amount during negotiations with other promoters etc.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      10:13am | 19/01/11

      How do they judge the ‘‘economic impact’‘?  Do they take off the cost to businesses of closing roads, the cost of police escorts etc? 
       
      Who gets this money? My taxes keep going up, so it isn’t me and presumably it isn’t the SA Government.

    • Nathan says:

      11:25am | 19/01/11

      The majority of the money is to local businesses - the hotels, cafes, retail stores, etc. that immediately benefit from the large uptick in business. Those businesses then have more money to spend on other services or staff, so on and so on.

      Any place that has closed roads is clearly somewhere the tour is going past, so I’d think the extra business generated by people viewing the race would vastly outweigh the few turned away by the inconvenience of a temporarily closed road.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      12:26pm | 19/01/11

      No. I think you may find that many businesses in places like Stirling, simply close when the race is in town and the staff get a day off, without pay for casuals. You are not allowed access in and out of the place as the police have it locked down between certain hours.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      02:38pm | 19/01/11

      Dunno Tony, maybe it’s that every hotel is twice as busy in Adelaide, the restaurants, wineries…?

      Even the little towns get trade like they’ve never seen. Thousands of fans, officials, teams, etc. swarming through looking to buy food and drink. Closing the main street of the odd one (and it probably is odd) here and there is no biggie in the overall scheme of things.

      Life’s pretty simple over there for you ey Tone? Guess if you aint seen it with yer own eyes, and it aint landed in yer own pocket, it never happened.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      04:14pm | 19/01/11

      I’m right on top of it Jack. The marquee in Victoria Sq is a few yards from my office. And I haven’t seen all that many tourists in town.

    • Nathan says:

      01:47pm | 20/01/11

      Tony, maybe you should visit other parts of town instead of just glancing out your window. Over the past few days Rundle Mall and Rundle St have been filled with tourists. And there’s a very noticeable increase in the number of people carrying maps of the city on the city loop bus. The village in Vic Sq is going to be pretty quiet during the day, as people are out actually watching the race.

    • Ricardo Jones says:

      10:22am | 19/01/11

      Our government spends a fortune on AFL every year, but AFL doesn’t get the international headlines like an Armstrong, or Tiger Woods. From a tourism point of view it makes more sense to spend money on a sport, or event, with international appeal. But yes, taxpayers should be made aware of how much those athletes are costing them.

      The sad reality is these American stars help promote Australia in a way Australian athletes can’t.

    • kerrie o'rourke says:

      12:47pm | 19/01/11

      Once taxpayers pay their tax and avoid penalties, taxpayers don’t care after that.
      They just mind their business.They just politics and other sports on TV

    • Edward James says:

      01:33pm | 19/01/11

      When governments spend money on promotions it is ours not theirs, at some point we need to close their ability to hide their actions behind the loophole of commercial in confidence. Where governments are spending out taxes, If the people involved dont like it they can stop taking our money, this goes for the compensation taxpayers shell out to people wronged by our Federal and State governments and local councils, Habib, Haneff and that German tourist are three which spring to mind. Again it is out money we are entitled to know what our representatives are costing us especially when they are often guilty of misgovernance. Edward James

    • Sam Chowder says:

      03:27pm | 19/01/11

      I can’t work out if Jack Thomas is Lance Armstrong or Mike Rann

    • Wendy Wu Vaughan says:

      04:47pm | 19/01/11

      Does Mike Rann go soon?

    • stephen says:

      05:53pm | 19/01/11

      The French rag, Le Monde, has been pressuring the ICU for years to re-test Lance’s samples. The French don’t like him because he wasn’t European and he kept winning their races.
      He trained to win. He was methodical, professional and was a team player.
      The Euro’s like their heroes sojourn, alone, carrying their spare tyres across their shoulders, taking water, and their piss, whenever they can get it.
      And then came 1982 when Aussies stage winners and moving cameras came to the Tour, and it has since then been driving the French crazy.
      Lance may well get a positve drug test from previous sample, and the miserable french may well get their man, but there will be many, like me, who won’t forget.

    • Shawn says:

      09:45pm | 23/03/12

      Governments are always averse to revealing such spending as it will draw flak from commenters, but what they don’t realize is that people are going to speculate and make matters worse if they stuck to their silent stance.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

Colleague Googled http://t.co/kL2eCAMvdj today and this was top result. Thanks fellas. http://t.co/G9ctaPaGqA

Paul Colgan

Amen, Senator... John McCain To Tim Cook: ‘Why The Hell Do I Have To Keep Updating Apps On My iPhone?’http://t.co/V9XIbzw752

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter