Taxpayers deserve to know what they’re forking out to sporting stars.

In South Australia, Premier Mike Rann - despite his reputation as a master of spin - has made a poor judgment when it comes to not disclosing how much Lance Armstrong is paid to appear at the Tour Down Under.
The State Government has continually refused to say how much it has paid the seven-time Tour de France winner to appear at the TDU, even claiming the information was commercial in confidence, thus putting the details out of the reach of freedom of information requests.
The argument has also been made that divulging the amount the state spends on the event would give other states leverage to poach Lance, and the TDU from SA.
But the refusal to say what Armstrong has been paid has guaranteed years of speculation and bad press.
In contrast, divulging it, and proudly, would have led to a modest amount of publicity, and allowed the government, as it already does, to argue that it is money well spent.
The knockers will always have a crack at a government which pays a multi-millionaire sports star to appear at an event.
And let’s face it - it does stick in the craw.
Here’s a rich individual who is being paid simply to turn up, on the back of (let’s face it) a well-earned reputation.
Arguments on forums such as The Advertiser‘s website AdelaideNow always devolve rapidly to calls for the money to be spent on hospitals or policing - an argument which would have governments spending nothing at all on anything frivolous such as tourism promotion or Australia Day fireworks if we take them to their logical conclusions.
But the fact is that whatever the government has spent on bringing Armstrong to SA (and it’s rumoured to be about $2 million) is money well spent.
While it has a growing profile in Australia, professional cycling is huge in Europe and largely thanks to Lance Armstrong’s achievements, has a healthy following in the US also. Even people who are not cycling fans will follow his exploits because of his heroic recovery from cancer and his record Tour de France achievements, as well as his ongoing efforts to raise money for cancer research.
His appearances in the TDU represent his return to, and retirement from, the world of international cycle racing, following his earlier retirement after his last Tour de France.
While the increase cannot solely be contributed to Armstrong’s appearance, the number of international riders competing in the community challenge in which amateur riders get to ride the TDU race course has jumped from 717 in 2008 to 2426 last year. The economic impact has jumped from $17.3 million to $41.5 million from 2008 to 2010.
And the number of international journalists travelling to SA to document Lance’s milestones has ballooned, bringing the race, and the state, to the world’s attention.
The race’s profile has also continued to grow, with this year’s line-up packed with some of the best riders in the world.
So why not divulge the fee, and challenge the knockers, and your political opponents, to argue that it was a waste of money?
Governments on the east coast have not been reluctant to say how much they are investing in bringing stars to Australia.
Shipping Oprah Winfrey and a studio full of American viewers to our shores cost a pretty penny - $3 million through Tourism Australia, which was made up of equal contributions from the Federal and New South Wales Governments.
Contributions from other states and the wage costs of the public servants who helped make it happen would have added up to millions more.
The outcome - according to an editorial in the Daily Telegraph last month an early estimate was a 35-fold return on investment.
Tiger Woods was paid $3 million by the Victorian Government to appear at the Australian Masters in November.
He was there to defend his title, which was the last one he won before the scandal surrounding his string of extra-marital affairs wrecked his marriage and knocked him out of golf while he dealt with the fall-out.
His return to the Masters was a compelling tale of a fallen hero attempting to make amends publicity gold.
While the Brumby Government argued it had to pay appearance fees to stop major events being poached by New South wales, that’s only part of the picture.
It’s just as easy for stars to be poached by other nations if the price tag is right.
Australia is fighting an uphill battle when it comes to winning the hearts of international tourists, with our strong dollar dealing travel operators a tough hand.
Governments which are spending millions on promotion, and getting measurable returns which justify that expense, should stand up, and (excuse the pun) be counted.
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision
The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision
Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses
Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…
Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this
Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…
Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?
ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
Michael S says:
"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone
Change Up! says:
I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more
Most commented