Put My Way on the karaoke machine. It’s the end of the night and the sun is coming up on a new government - a Labor minority government, to be precise. If you’re a bit of a political tragic having followed the campaign and its surreal denouement, tomorrow you might wake up feeling as if someone has died.

I'm on a boat ... Peter Nicholson in The Australian

But conversely if you don’t care - and many normal people don’t seem to have given a hoot, in fact being politically rudderless has been a subject of some mirth - you might feel as if that irritating but really fun friend of yours has just left town. Anyway here’s The Punch’s list of our favourite shark-jumping and oddball moments of the 2010 campaign. Add yours in the comments, and we might build out the list. Let’s start with today’s silliness:

1. Rob Oakeshott’s speech announcing who he would support: Really, could he actually have drawn it out any longer? He started with a list of thank-yous that made it seem like he was accepting an Oscar, then proceeded with a meandering justification of his decision that prompted Laurie Oakes to wonder if we would be here another fortnight. But in the end said he would support Julia Gillard in helping Labor form a minority government.

2. Gillard’s on a boat: Call it the firing of a very big campaign gun. One of the first things Julia Gillard did as Prime Minister was to go to Darwin and get on a naval border patrol boat. She was joined by David Bradbury, the Labor MP for Lindsay, a marginal seat where immigration was significant issue. And you can start your cynicism… now.

3. The Liberal candidate who said Labor was bringing Australia closer to a Muslim nation: David Barker was dropped immediately, but it was an embarrassment for Tony Abbott, confirming some of the worst fears that vacillating voters may have had about core beliefs among the Liberal party rank-and-file.

4. Laurie Oakes’s question to Gillard at the Press Club. The moment it all started to go horribly wrong for Gillard. I also enjoyed the way Oakes had a little drink of water when he was done, like he was sitting back to watch fireworks.

5. Kevin Rudd gets gall stones: A cloud of suspicion had surrounded the former Prime Minister after the damaging leaks against Julia Gillard. It utterly destabilised the Labor campaign and the threat of another leak hung like the Sword of Damocles over Gillard. Rudd had gone to ground in his Brisbane electorate and wasn’t taking questions. But the strain showed: he was admitted to hospital to have his gall bladder removed.

Queue theories about poison-tipped umbrellas and faceless ALP operatives lacing campaign trail meat pies with a little extra something in the ketchup.

6. Real Julia v Fake Julia: One of the more notable tactical errors of the campaign triggered a wave of unpleasant questions about just which Julia Gillard had been out campaigning. It all started with an interview in which Gillard said she would personally take charge of campaign strategy. “It’s time for me to make sure the real Julia is well and truly on display,” she said.

7. Mark Latham starts his career as a journalist. No, Channel 9 weren’t kidding. Confirmed his status as Australia’s biggest ratbag, and also had the hide in his 60 Minutes story to encourage people to cast an informal vote while he is living on his significant pension given to him by his participation in machine politics.

8. The Rudd-Gillard meeting. A particular favourite below, but the full set of excruciating photos is here. See them and weep.

What a great meeting

9. Abbott gets on the floor at Rooty Hill “What I want to do mate is go down, be on the level with people.” There are varying view on this. I was watching and just as the thought occurred to me it was a clever stunt, someone nearby said: “What a tosser.” What did you think?

10. Hawke’s speech at the ALP conference: “A really good but very long impression of Grandpa Simpson.” Read about it here.

11. Abbott’s 36-hour campaign finishing stretch: As stunts go this was a pretty impressive one. He even had a beer at one point. Hard core.

Abbott on his campaign bender

12. Parramatta to Epping rail link: The Labor government announced it would build this Sydney rail link with the NSW Government. The trouble was it was something that had been announced repeatedly before and had never happened. It was memorably described by David Penberthy as the Bullshit Express.

13. The sermon at the airport. Bob Katter arrival into Canberra to start negotiations on forming a government was a sublime moment. Resplendent in his hat, he said the press had “given a run” to “every idea under the sun “except us”.

14. Wyatt Roy gets elected: It is an excellent point that if he’s old enough to fight for the country in a war, he’s old enough to serve in the Parliament. But the Doogie Howser wisecracks and jokes about his parents letting him stay up late to celebrate are still funny.

15. The word “paradigm” enters common usage for 48 hours. Paradigm is a word with about 15 various opaque meanings. The best you can get from Google’s various definitions is that it is “an accepted model or pattern” or “a general belief of how the world works”, which is anathema to politics. There was much talk started by the Three Amigos about a new paradigm in politics, and Julia Gillard told the National Press Club that a Labor government would “build a new paradigm for regional development”. Outside of the Twilight Zone I believe the normal word is “policy” or “plan”.

16. The non-result: Not quite knowing who the government would be when the country woke up on the Sunday after polling day left air time and column inches to fill. It all got a bit silly at some points, because with the rural independents giving not indication of which party they would support, there was little to say except that nobody knew what was going to happen.

17. Two glorious weeks of non-government: Why didn’t we have looting?

91 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • fairsfair says:

      04:23pm | 07/09/10

      I kind of feel like looting now…

      I actually don’t know what to think. I think worry is probably it. Worry that after all of this - two months of pathetic politics - we will see absolutely no change to our way of life - which is a worry.

      They have ignored the polls and though I am not angry or upset by how this has happened (the whole hung parliament thing) I just can’t help but feel we are headed downhill fast.  Buckle up.

    • Roja says:

      05:00pm | 07/09/10

      “we will see absolutely no change to our way of life”

      Excellent, I’m enjoying life right now.  Thats great news!

      No interest rate rise, Abbott lost and I will see absolutely no change to my way of life. 

      What a great day wink

    • fairsfair says:

      06:02pm | 07/09/10

      You are in the minority Roja (literally - the coalition won more seats). Good luck to you - but people in my area will continue to struggle.

      People can’t see past feathering their own nest to identify the real issues - this country is fast running out of feathers - despite now formally having Turkeys in charge.

    • AFR says:

      06:27pm | 07/09/10

      I have the count at 72-all, where is the “majority of seats coming from”?

    • Roja says:

      07:32pm | 07/09/10

      Oh no, the Coalition had a majority of 50.01% to 49.99% on 2PP with 72 all on seats, so not exactly a majority of any substance.

      The number that counts is 4 independants backed the ALP, while 1 nut bag backed the Coalition and 1 that is supposedly part of the Coalition took 14 days to say he wanted to be part of it, sort of.

      That two conservatives didn’t want to back Abbott says absolutely everything!

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      07:47pm | 07/09/10

      AFR says:06:27pm; I’ve been wondering that myself, got the most seat rAbbott and I’m the lord jesus.

    • dead to me says:

      07:01am | 08/09/10

      Oh I think there will be change.

      It is a hollow victory for Julia. She would be better off losing if she couldn’t get an outright win. Now she will be remembered as the PM that forced her way in by back stabbing, losing seats and getting a hung parliament and begging a bunch of Independents for her job…...sad.

      And we are keeping an eye on Shorten/Arbib aka the muppet masters.

    • fairsfair says:

      08:33am | 08/09/10

      I consider the WA Nat to be part of the coalition - so that is 73 for me. The people in his electorate did not vote for an independent - the voted for a National. It is a long standing coalition of parties. Not one that is announced after an election…

      This has changed my view on voting independent. It is pointless. Not only do they not have the party power to institute effective change to their own electorates, but you vote for one who stands up for their electorate (Katter) and he is labelled ‘mad’ and then has no influence whatsoever. You vote for the other two - who go against what their electorate actually wants and sides with the minority. Good luck in your ministry position Oakshott. Good luck Australia.

    • Rebecca says:

      10:30pm | 08/09/10

      I don’t see what the big deal is… it doesn’t matter who wins the election, because a few months in everybody will just complain about how bad they are.

    • Zatnikatal says:

      04:23pm | 07/09/10

      All good things must come to an end, I liked the whole non government thing.

    • MarK says:

      04:30pm | 07/09/10

      Now the real game commences.

      Cue the usual infighting and frontbench jostling from both sides.

      Colgo seriously though that picture of Swan bowing to the indies should be on the list. I have never seen a moment that was so funny captured so beautifully as he fawned in front of the new masters. Well he didn’t really and it was all very unfortunate timing for him but a caption competition should be held on The Punch with that photo. It was a ripper.

    • T.Chong says:

      04:31pm | 07/09/10

      The sky wont fall, industries wont be nationalised, you will still gat paid,  “Greenies” arent going to come around forcing you to do smack, the sun will rise.
        Too bad for Abbott, with Turnbull and Hockey lurking, his days are numbered. Bishop will have to practice her “undying loyalty” speech.
      Best of all will be reading all the teeth clenched outrage. Lotsa fun to be had.

    • Peter says:

      05:08pm | 07/09/10

      Yes and Julia will have to watch her back,,Rudd is still lurking in the background.

    • Sodapoppy says:

      05:38pm | 07/09/10

      Well, with Bob Brown calling in on Joolyafoolya every week, at least she’ safe, and the carpetbagger doesn’t have to worry about losing the keys to the Comcar.

    • 6c legs says:

      06:19pm | 07/09/10

      *clink* Chongy, *clink*  grin

      Finally. Tonight I can sleep, safe in the knowledge that the madmonk will be too busy looking for and stamping out the whiteants within to whiteant the whole damn country!

      Maybe, just maybe, the Media *now* might just pay some real attention to the Con-servatives “policies”. (sadly, I don’t trust the Media enough to hold my breath waiting for them to, though…)

    • AFR says:

      04:34pm | 07/09/10

      And in other news, interest rates on hold. What a great day.

    • Macca says:

      04:34pm | 07/09/10

      I’m just glad its over. It will be interesting to see how the independents cope with the accountability of being part of a Government.

      A lot of people have made the point that this is a great time to be an independent, I actually think its the opposite. Oakshot and Windsor have had to make decisions which could potentially alienate them in their electorates.

      Its up to them and the Gillard government to improve on next term, otherwise you can expect a huge campaign from the Coalition in those independent seats in 3 years time.

      Also, would like to point out how many people thought Abbott was unelectable, and then praise the performance of the ALP. The ALP has a lot of improving to do, I think many will admit that. As for underestimating Abbott, I think a lot of people will continue to do so

    • MarK says:

      04:40pm | 07/09/10

      Windsor has said he is retiring at the next election anyway so he has nothing to lose really. Pension is locked in and now he has his little place in history to.

      Oakeshott will be looking for a job soon though. The nats will win Lyne and New England easily next run regardless of anything else.

    • TheRealDave says:

      04:51pm | 07/09/10

      So when Oakeshot correctly pointed out that his electorate was more likely to vote independent over ANY party at the Local, State AND Federal election you just decided to ignore that bit ??

      You can take those blinkers off now - you lost wink

    • Nick says:

      05:12pm | 07/09/10

      To” Get Real Dave”,I wouldn’t call Labor getting less in the two party prefered vote winning.The real losers in this are the majority of Australians.

    • MarK says:

      05:19pm | 07/09/10

      I live in the electorate Dave.

      http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionFirstPrefs-15508-130.htm - there is the Lyne Division

      http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionFirstPrefs-15508-135.htm - there is the New England Division

      A few facts Dave about Port Macquarie that Rob neglected to tell you.

      1. Look at the links and see how on first preferences The Nationals are not that far behind Oakeshott. Preferences from the Nats go directly to him as an assumed conservative hence the huge 2PP win.Now look at New England - tell me who has the most independent voters.

      2. Peter Besseling is the local state member and independent. He was Rob Oakeshotts right hand man. A former NSW Rugby Player and very nice family guy. He was fully endorsed by Oakeshott to take over when Oakeshott left the state seat and went Federal. Oakeshotts influence in Port Macquarie where he lives can’t be underestimated in getting Besseling elected for the first time

      3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Macquarie_state_by-election,_2008
      There is the link to the result. Besseling will not have Oakeshott’s endorsement next time as such and will run on his own record. After jumping to Labor good luck with any endorsement anyway.

      4. The Port Macquarie council was a mishmash of Labor-Nat-Indies and as a group wasted millions on a new entertainment centre - The Glasshouse with a hint of corruption in the mix. Bottom line the Council was sacked. Yes sacked - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Macquarie-Hastings_Council_dismissal,_2008 Not exactly a ringing endorsement for local government independent voting habits is it?

      I didn’t even read the Wiki but the facts will be about right. Note well that the Glasshouse issue that Drew was heavily involved in sealed his fate against Oakeshott by default. Drew was slaughtered on The Glasshouse issue.

      So Dave still happy to take Oakeshotts word on the matter?

      We can look up Katter’s seat if you want too but lets just say this - Rob was wrong and so are you. You didn’t check the facts did you?

      1. Federally Windsor canes him
      2. Peculiar local issues at the State level propelled him and his staffer into the state seat. Note how much the Nats caught up to Besseling after Drew was out of the way.
      3. At a local government level we have an administrator.

      Oakeshott was full of it.

      Would you like to play again Dave? Would you like to ask me anything more about local issues? Would you like me to link any other data? Would you like to get a clue and comment on material you have a vague notion on?

      Seriously wow.. Blinkers? Eyes wide open and full of facts here. How about you Dave?

      So to summarise Oakeshott rode a wave of anti Nat feelings against a dubious local development. The Nats poll clear 2nd in the electorate.

      And he has no idea about local voting patterns going on his statement. The Nats will be licking their lips for a crack at this seat next time.

      Toodles Dave

    • Roja says:

      05:36pm | 07/09/10

      @Nick - so you are calling the 50.01% 2PP majority that voted liberal, national, family first or one nation or similar all losers? 

      If so, then I would have to agree…

    • The Badger says:

      07:39pm | 07/09/10

      Macca
      A very sensible post.
      Hopefully the coalition will work towards good government in a cooperative spirit with all in government.

      Never look down on anybody unless you’re helping him up. 
      Jesse Louis Jackson

    • Sven Gali says:

      09:06pm | 07/09/10

      @ Nick ... Could you please provide links to your complaints that Kim Beazley should have been Prime Minister in 1998 when he won more of the two party preferred vote than John Howard ? Cheers.

    • MarK says:

      07:49am | 08/09/10

      I see Dave hasn’t come back. Ahhhh I love a guy that runs and hides.

    • James Darby says:

      04:38pm | 07/09/10

      Looks like Tony Windsor is going to do to Australia what Gold Coast City Council is doing to the Broadwater. (i.e. poison it and pretend that the fish have disappeared due to recreational fishing) Labor lost their huge majority because Labor is no good. No good Tony Windsor. Broadband is no good for that money even if Labor could deliver NBB for $42B. It is still no good as the computor is not the answer for life. It is the answer for social death and economic death and mental control. You did support Gillard the Green Red partner of Brown tan track Green? - for a fast online internet connection Tony? What game do you play you foolish bland man? You forever will damn Independents as evidenced by your truely unrepresentative behaviour to your own constituents. Is this the payback that you always wanted to give to the Nats for disendorsing you for being a drunk? How I wish you were not retiring so I could have the pleasure of seeing your constituents give you the tar and feather at the polling booth next election .

    • Gillard has everything to Lose. says:

      04:38pm | 07/09/10

      The campaign is only just beginning.  This is the most divisive, cunning, incompetent Labor leader in Australian history.  She has turned Australians against Australians, and for that hideous deed she will pay. As sure as night follows day, Gillard’s actions will repeatedly haunt her.

      We now sit back and watch her narrow majority fall prey to competing interests as Labor leader contenders plot and scheme pay-back for the huge majority loss.  She’s going to be awake 18 hours a day, 7 days a week, eyes open for knives from every direction.  It’s not going to be pretty.

      The Opposition will tear her to pieces, and I hope with no concern for her gender, because it’s time for Abbott to remove the kid gloves - female or not. 
      There’s one person besides Gillard, Rudd and Faulkner who now knows exactly what happened the night she back-stabbed Rudd.  Katter didn’t spend two nights with the Rudds without copping the full crappy story.  I bet Rudd gave him the low-down on Gillard and her union hacks.  And we thought Rudd was persuading Katter to go with Gillard when they were getting even.
      For someone who just crawled over the line with a bit of a kick from a couple of cowboys, rescuing Gillard’s political career is going to be nigh impossible.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      05:16pm | 07/09/10

      “Sour Grapes Makes for a Lousy Wine”

      Get used to the fact…..the ALP have been re-elected.

      Bitter Sweet.

      P.S. Let us not forget Abbott backstabbed Turnbull and only won by 1 vote.
      Its simply the nature of the beast.
      Enjoy Opposition…...again raspberry

    • Zatnikatal says:

      05:17pm | 07/09/10

      Turned Australians against Australians. When? How? The Howard years were all about wedge politics and the right wing brigade screaming Bob Brown will tear up the constitution and use to role joints from the plants he will grow on parliment house are the ones turning Aussie on Aussie.The independants have done a good thing for parlimentary reform, let us hope it holds.

    • T.Chong says:

      04:42pm | 07/09/10

      A quick depatch for Abbott, withTurnbull taking over , and the gormless Hockey effectively sidelined.
      No Govenor General for Bronny Bishop, while J. Bishop gets to repeat her undying loyalty speech.

    • Billy B says:

      05:26pm | 07/09/10

      Chongy - I will walk down the main street in Geelong nude if Turnbull gets back as leader.

    • Paul says:

      05:03am | 08/09/10

      T. Chong, whatever non-prescription medication you’re on, get rid of it before it further affects your reasoning.

    • shane says:

      04:42pm | 07/09/10

      Cue the blistering invective from Lib supporters. I guess God didn’t want him to win.

    • Sam says:

      04:51pm | 07/09/10

      The Devil did call Oakeshott. Maybe he votes Labor.

    • Bob says:

      04:48pm | 07/09/10

      This is not what anyone wanted.

      But to give a government that executed its leader and wasted billions is beyond comprehension. Back to the polls as this is not going to work.

    • Tony says:

      12:36am | 08/09/10

      Bob are you sure nobody? Wanted?

    • Ernie Money says:

      04:48pm | 07/09/10

      I,m thinking that never before in our political history have the issues of political power being so heavily scrutinized,viva la democracy,viva la power of our vote.

    • Bruce says:

      04:51pm | 07/09/10

      Just shows you, the coaltion won on all measures, but can loose the election. Well thats democracy. Congratulations Priminister Windsor Oakshott !!

    • AFR says:

      05:06pm | 07/09/10

      “the coaltion won on all measures” - please explain?

    • TimB says:

      06:00pm | 07/09/10

      Lets see AFR…

      The Coalition-
      *Won the most seats. (73-72, please shut up about Crook, he counts)
      *Won the Primary vote.
      *Won the 2PP vote- Something that Gillard claimed gave her more legitimacy than the Coalition…right up until she lost it of course,
      * Had more support in the 3 deciding Indy electorates than Labor.

      If Gillard had any decency, any respect for the Australian people, any respect for DEMOCRACY, she would have done the gracious thing, told the Independents to support Abbot, and offered him the Prime ministership.

      Instead she weasels her way back into power with a bunch of sleazy deals that crap all over the issues that everyone thought they were voting for.

      Perhaps MarK and others are correct and it’s for the best. Once the Unholy Alliance finish screwing the country, the rest of the electorate might finally wake up. Then Tony can come in and win a majority in his own right.

      Look forward to unleashing another “I told you so” soon.

    • shane says:

      06:18pm | 07/09/10

      @TimB.  If you think that either political party, or any political leader in the same situation as Julia wouldn’t have done all they could to retain power, then you must be smoking something.

      And given that we now have Lab returned, the Libs obviously didn’t win on all measures….

    • AFR says:

      06:35pm | 07/09/10

      Sorry guys, but the WA Nationals are not part of the coalition. 72 all. The 2PP vote is separated by such a small number of votes, that its largely immaterial (I don’t even think it has all been counted - the on the run figures were pointless as they didn’t count a number of seats). Who came second in Windsor, Katter and Oakshott’s electorates is irrelevant. At the end of the day, we should be grateful for a minority government - BOTH sides will now have to be well and truly on their toes.

    • The Badger says:

      07:32pm | 07/09/10

      @Timb

      Give it a rest Tim. No matter how much you use statistics or what-if’s it isn’t going to change a thing.

      Take a deep breath and let’s see what develops mate.

      It’s not the end of the world. Let’s hope the opposition can work with everyone to deliver better outcomes for Australia. Isn’t that what we all want?

      Put aside the partisan bull and let’s give it a go.

    • farkurnell says:

      08:45pm | 07/09/10

      give me a break Bruce ,I don’t see the LNP with 76 members -therefore they are losers.Yes ALP are also losers,but BETTER losers.

    • Gah says:

      09:13pm | 07/09/10

      Enough with the whinging about the primary and 2PP votes, TimB. They are figures which do not paint the whole picture. Take a look at the 1998 election, for example. The ALP comfortably beat the coalition in both the primary and 2PP votes, yet they still came up 8 seats short of forming government. Go figure.

    • TimB says:

      06:36am | 08/09/10

      @  Gah, nice to see you completely ignored my other points. The seats were the deciding factor in that election, so they should have been here. The last 3 were notionally Coalition, & two of those members ignored the will of their own electorate as evidenced by shockingly low Labor vote in those electorates. They have ignored the will of their own electorate, the people they’re sup[posed to represent. There’s nothing democratic about that, no matter which way you spin it.

      @ AFR, every official source counts them, and if it wasn’t for the close result you wouldn’t have heard a peep out of Crook. That was just him trying to get attention and the same porkbarrelling the others did. He ran under the Nats banner, he counts. If he wanted to count as independent he should have run as such.

      And finally @Badger. I’m not an idiot. I know it isnt going to change a thing (but when do facts ever change anything for the Left? They’re conveniently ignored at will). I’m just pointing out that Gillard isn’t in there with the blessing of the Australian people or any kind of mandate.

      That means when she claims that she can now put through a mining tax or ETS/Carbon tax, she can’t claim a mandate. She dropped these policies from the public eye the second they stared becoming electoral poison, she didn’t have the guts to campaign on them (compare Howards GST in ‘98).  Pushing them through now will be deceptive conduct.
      As for giving them a chance….they got one in 2007. Can YOU put aside “the partisan bull” and admit they stuffed that up yet? You don’t turf your PM if everything is going peachy.

      I await the trainwreck.

    • TheRealDave says:

      04:54pm | 07/09/10

      On point 11 - he had a Shandy - not a beer.

      If he had a beer instead of a shiela’s drink he might have won.

    • Zatnikatal says:

      05:21pm | 07/09/10

      Yeah, I am pretty gay and even I looked down on him for having a shandy. Dear lord, a shandy. Have not had one of those since I was in primary school. Man up Tony

    • Farkurnell says:

      08:52pm | 07/09/10

      iId say he got the shandy idea from that focus group everybody listens to

    • David C says:

      04:59pm | 07/09/10

      what is confusing me is this idea that they backed Labor because they had more to lose? Isnt that the whole point?

    • Peter says:

      05:02pm | 07/09/10

      A great win for our democracy today..

      Having thought about this, i think the Nationals are the biggest losers out of this election. Country people will now realise that the Nats just lick the boots of their Liberal masters. I think country people will look more towards independants in future election..

      Obviously the NBN was a deal breaker for these Indies. Which makes one ponder the question. What sort of representation do the Nats provide their constituents within the Liberal Party? None it seems. The Nats must have known that the NBN was a big deal for regional Australia….

      Where’s Barnaby Joice today? He sold his soul to the Liberal Party at the expense of his country constituants and he had the gawl to give Windsor a hard time on election night. Windsor, Oakshott and Katter have just done more for regional Australia in a few days than Barnaby Joice will do in his entire career and have done more than the Nationals have done as a party in my living memory….

      Now this is what I call democracy.. Well done Australia!!!

    • DaisyDuke says:

      05:30pm | 07/09/10

      These 3 got the whole of Australia by the balls by fate or fortune and squeezed for all it was worth.
      You are clearly mistaking extortion for democracy.

    • Gah says:

      05:34pm | 07/09/10

      The Nationals (or gnats as I prefer to call them) have been in their death throes for quite some time now. Just look at election results - they have consistently lost seats in every election in over a decade. I wasn’t the least bit surprised when I first learned that three of the four independents all hailed from regional seats. I hope this comes as a wake up call to the gnats - the writing is very much on the wall for them. If these independents manage to actually pull through and deliver for regional Australia, I can easily see the National Party going completely tits-up by the end of the decade.

    • Peter says:

      07:49pm | 07/09/10

      @ Daisy Duke. Negotiation and listening to other elected reps is what democracy is all about. There has been no pork barrelling in these electorates, all 3 had the whole of regional Australia in mind. They handled a responsibility they didn’t ask for with a lot of class. My respect for Mr Katter has grown over the last 2 weeks, and i am a big fan of both Windsor and Oakshott (yes his speech was too long).

      It’s our system in Australia that unusual Daisy, most other countries in the world have coalition governments. I want to see more of this kind government in the future. They might start putting their countries interests ahead of their party..

      That’s why the Nationals are dead. They knew the NBN would be important to regional Australia, but they just wanted to keep their Liberal masters happy and just remained silent. So I ask Barnaby Joice, just like he asked Windsor on election night, are you Arthur or Martha when it comes to regional Australia? or just a party clone who does what he’s told?

    • Bruce says:

      08:12pm | 07/09/10

      Not sure if PM Tony Windsors NBN issue was anything to do with his decision. I believe he hated the Nationals so much that he was never going to vote for the coalition, he just found the excuse he needed. As for PM Oakshott, I heard on the radio he even had the next electorates labor member handing out how to vote leaflets for him. Figure that one out.

    • Richard says:

      08:47pm | 07/09/10

      Actually Peter and Gah, you would have been right about the Nats becoming irrelevent IF Oakeshott and Windsor had supported the coalition: such a move would have effectively signalled to all country/rural/regional voters that they can get a better deal for their individual areas AND still have a conservative government (which the majority of them do favour) if they vote for Independents instead of Nats.

      But instead Oakeshott and Windsor went with Labor. Well this completely changes the equation. You can bet that the Nats in Lyne and New England are now rubbing their hands together and licking their lips~ they know they can win those seats back now they have a rock solid platform to campaign on: “a vote for the Independents is a vote for Labor and the Greens”, (and you’ve never been to the bush and talked to people out there if you don’t think that is a massive vote winner).

      In fact this is the best outcome for the coalition, one which many of the backbenchers were secretly hoping for (as Windsor himself insinuated during his presser). The Nationals will now be galvanised to fight an enemy that is much closer to home, a much more clear and present danger to them than the inner-urban latte set: nothing unites the rank and file and invigorates their fighting spirit like a the betrayal of a former comrade.

    • Sven Gali says:

      09:55pm | 07/09/10

      Oakeshott and Windsor must be quaking in their boots, Richard, having already seen off National Party rivals as Independents for eight and nineteen years respectively. Having a vested interest in them retaining their seats, Labor will make sure that they and their electorates are very well looked after.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if in three year’s time they don’t paraphrase Keating when Peacock suggested a vote for Hawke was a vote for him. What are the Nationals going to say if the Independents reply, “but a vote for the Nationals is a vote for the Nationals” ? 

      p.s. Loved the “best outcome for the coalition”.

    • Peter says:

      09:42am | 08/09/10

      @ Richard, if Tony Abbott behaves like i expect him to behave (ie. a saboteur), then he can expect annihilation at the next election..

      You heard it from me first.. A lot of people are sick of party games…

    • TimB says:

      10:49am | 08/09/10

      @ Peter…Yeah because Tony has really behaved as you all expected over the last 10 months hasn’t he? I mean first off you expected him to implode and do something monumentally stupid. Then you expected him to lead the Coalition to a landside defeat. Neither of those things happened.

      I tell you what else isn’t going to happen: Abbott being dumped for Turnbull. Turnbull wouldn’t have got anywhere near a win. Anyone who thinks he would have has rocks in their head. The Liberals are smart enough to know when they’re onto a good thing.

      The other thing that I don’t think that will happen though (as hilarious as it would be to see it), will be Julia getting knifed by Heffernan or Combet (or anyone else in her party). They won’t have the guts. The second there’s even a whiff of a leadership spill, the Independents would call “no confidence” and defect to the Coalition.

    • Steven says:

      05:03pm | 07/09/10

      On an irrelevant note, I am calling Botox on our Prime Minister. How can someone talk about receiving the top job for 30-40 minutes and not move one muscle on her forehead or raise an eyebrow?

    • meinsydney says:

      06:51pm | 07/09/10

      Yep.  I noticed that too.  Bizarre.

    • Dark Rider says:

      05:08pm | 07/09/10

      In my 65 years on this earth, I have yet to see a Labor government which could manage an economy, let alone manage a country. I doubt anything is going to change soon. Having the Greens in the wings can only make matters worse.

    • Michael says:

      05:18pm | 07/09/10

      By simple calculation, you missed John Curtin by a few years.  Pity about that.  You might have had a different point of view.

    • Peter says:

      05:34pm | 07/09/10

      Hawke and Keating made a good go of it. Their economic reforms kept Johnny Howard in power for over 10 years… They made him look good…

    • shane says:

      06:09pm | 07/09/10

      You’re 65 and you still think there’s a difference between the parties? Are you a member of the Lib party? Or just someone who has swallowed the bait?

    • jb says:

      05:09pm | 07/09/10

      The Rudd/gillard govt get back into power on the strength of one guy who got given a brown paper bag with a portfolio in it and another who didn’t want to go back to the polls because he thinks the other team would win.
      Yep thats really listening to the Australian people.
      You two might be in a bit of strife for your decisions when the people really get to speak…

    • nosthow says:

      05:11pm | 07/09/10

      The Nosthow party tonight will be a bottler - Moet champers being consumed in large quatities ! Winners are grinners and the losers can please themselves !

    • DaveinPerth says:

      05:11pm | 07/09/10

      Cool.
      When do we get Malcolm back ?

    • Nicole says:

      05:19pm | 07/09/10

      18. Wayne Swan on election night in absolute denial. That was hilarious watching Michael Kroger make a complete slapper out of him. I loved it.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      05:40pm | 07/09/10

      Denial….maybe Liberal Party Hacks should look that up. As already your comments are bitter and twisted.

      Congrats on a Progressive Minority Labor Govt.

      From Progressive Darlinghurst,Sydney.

      raspberry

    • Nicole says:

      07:37pm | 07/09/10

      Well der. It’s taken you this long to work out that I’m bitter and twisted? Sheesh!

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      09:21pm | 07/09/10

      shades of 1975

    • Peter the Pan says:

      05:29pm | 07/09/10

      Why not give Labor another 3 year crack.They haven’t completely stuffed up Australia yet.They still need a little more time.Then we can have a clear majority at the next election.

    • Kris says:

      05:42pm | 07/09/10

      Well Julia, You got what you wanted. Your in for the ride of your life, and I hope you feel every bump along the way. Your a power hungry, Pseudo Prime Minister, who was not elected by the majority of people of this country.  Tough times are ahead Julia! One day the sword will fall your way as it did with your part in the bringing down of K Rudd. So watch your back… Ouch! What was that !  Is that at dagger I see before me?

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      06:32pm | 07/09/10

      Before the 07 election I predicted (on line) that Red Ghoulia would knife Little Kevvy in the back before the 2010 election. Prediction, Bill “look at me” Shorten will lead Labor to the next poll.

    • The Bear says:

      07:57pm | 07/09/10

      Nooooooo!  Anthing but Shorten.  Reminds me of Schwarten here in Qld.  (noise of up-chucking in background).  I like it the way it is - stability breeds contempt!

    • Crash says:

      12:44am | 08/09/10

      if the labor party is stupid enough to swap horses mid stream again after the backlash from kevin’s dumping, they will richly deserve to lose

    • Paul says:

      05:22am | 08/09/10

      Robert, I made the same prediction and I agree with your current prediction. It will be Shorten and Combet leading the Labor/Greens/Independents coalition at the next election, but fortunately they won’t prevail.

    • dead to me says:

      06:47pm | 07/09/10

      This country is in trouble….already.

    • Greg says:

      07:26pm | 07/09/10

      Campaign 2010 isn’t over, it could well continue for another 3 years, while we are just one by-election away from a change in government.

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      08:03pm | 07/09/10

      Just want to say one thing…...  Waaaaaaa-****‘n-hoooooooo!!!!!! wonder how long rAbbott will last now…. I reckon Malcolm will be tapping him on the shoulder before long.

      rAbbott whinged he won the most seats…. pfffffft! it was 72 all.

    • Reilly James says:

      08:56pm | 07/09/10

      All I can say is Rob Oakshot and Tony Windsor had better watch out next time!!

    • Sven Gali says:

      09:25pm | 07/09/10

      It’s been an absorbing election, but for mine the highlight was after Wilkie had sided with Labor, perpetual fall-guy Andrew Robb having to pretend to Tony Jones on Lateline that the billion in a paper bag Abbott had offered Wilkie is still part of their plan, even if they lost.

      http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2010/s3001221.htm

      “TONY JONES: Let’s assume that you assume government, because you still might…

      ANDREW ROBB: Yes…

      TONY JONES: there is every possibility evidently. Does that offer of the $1 billion for the Hobart hospital remain on the table? I mean is that a commitment you’ve actually made to the people of Hobart, or is it just a bargaining chip for an independent?

      ANDREW ROBB: No, that was a decision that we took to put on the table win or lose, win or lose office.

      TONY JONES: So that’s there now, that’s now in your costings, is it? $1 billion, a definite guaranteed offer to the people of Hobart for their hospital?

      ANDREW ROBB: That is now a project which we will factor into our long-term spending program, along with the other major infrastructure programs that we’ve got…

      TONY JONES: Is it a commitment…

      ANDREW ROBB: We’ve got a prospect…

      TONY JONES: I’m just trying to understand is it a commitment to the people of Hobart, that there’s a $1 billion…

      ANDREW ROBB: ... that’s what I just said…

      TONY JONES: ... on offer from your government?

      ANDREW ROBB: I thought I just confirmed that, Tony, yes.”

      So, there was that, plus all the Coalition supporters running around like footy players celebrating, and then checking the scoreboard to find they’d lost by a point.

    • Pelle says:

      05:30am | 08/09/10

      Tony Jones either has a hearing impairment or lacks basic comprehension skills when he has to ask the same question over and over even after it has been answered.
      I suppose that is the attack dog mentality of the left-leaning media.

    • Bruce says:

      09:05am | 08/09/10

      Pelle: Confirm. Tony Jones has selective hearing, only hears the labor whispers. If its to the contrary he ignores it.

    • Sven Gali says:

      09:09am | 08/09/10

      Tony’s comprehension is fine, Pelle, as demonstrated by him letting Robb know loud and clear that he knows bullshit when he hears it.

    • Anjuli says:

      10:26am | 08/09/10

      Oakeshott’s speech was in the way of an apology ,as why did he looked so pained when making it.

    • Rob says:

      12:57pm | 08/09/10

      Premature call.

      You can say goodbye to Federal Campaign 2010 v1

      v2 will start around November…

    • fehowarth says:

      01:16pm | 08/09/10

      Neither party won the election.  Ms Gillard won the government because a handful of elected members did not believe or trust Mr. Abbott.  Most of these men have sat in parliament for years and know both Ms Gillard and Mr Abbott well. They voted for the Welsh sheila over the English lad.  Ms Gillard was able to negotiate better than Mr Abbott did. Mr Abbott relied on his perceived right to rule.  He really believes that everything about Labor is negative. He still believes he won the election.  This does not say much for his judgement.

    • Florence Howarth says:

      01:17pm | 08/09/10

      Mr Abbott needs to be careful about forcing a new election.  The next election will be fought in an arena much different to the last. Mr Abbott has not changed his attack method from the last election.  He will need to let the past go and come up with something new.  Is he capable of lateral thinking or new ideas? Is he an attack dog and nothing more? Are the public fed up with the constant negativity of Mr. Abbott?  Will he be able to explain his beliefs to the voters, not keep them hidden as he does now? Will he continue to talk the economy down as his party has done for the last three years? Will those voters, up to 14%, mostly NSW, who put a blank form in the box vote formally next time?  By the way, the legitimate government is the won that has the confidence of the lower house.  I am sure that this will be quickly put to a vote. As for the independents, they tried and rejected the coalition before becoming independent.

    • Sammys says:

      07:48pm | 08/09/10

      As at 7.46 pm Wednesday, 8 September ALP are ahead on 2PP by a little over 1000 votes: http://vtr.aec.gov.au/
      If I hear one more person talk about the 2PP I will scream. Until they have finished counting there is no point using 2PP in your arguement… it is invalid.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter