Hands up everyone who never sent an email which, if made public, would cause themselves and their employer massive embarrassment.

'Fabulous Fab' entering the Senate hearing. Yes, that's him on the right. Pic: AFP

The particularly modern form of humiliation has the added bonus of many of them being recorded electronically, putting them beyond dispute. It’s not someone’s recollection of events - it’s Microsoft’s.

Investment banking firm Goldman Sachs is the latest to cop it, with emails from executives talking about “shitty” products they were selling with one hand and betting against with the other. The most sensational are the emails from Fabrice “Fabulous Fab” Tourre to his girlfriend referring to “Frankenstein” products invented via “intellectual masturbation” being sold to widows and orphans. Not much room here for the traditional defence of being taken out of context.

Even with Wall Street’s reputation for capitalist brutality the guys testifying before the US Senate committee investigating the role of investment banks in the subprime crisis have the hides of a rhino.

“I firmly believe that my conduct was correct,” Fabulous Fab told the committee overnight.

Like I said, rhino.

Then there’s his boss, Lloyd Blankfein, the Wall Street executive from central casting who has been vigorously defending the company, which was once famously described in Rolling Stone  as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”

The core of the allegation against Goldman Sachs is that they were selling risky products to people while also “going short” on those same products - betting they would lose value, in which case they would profit. Essentially they were betting their own customers would lose money.

This has all started a hand-wringing debate from predictable quarters about the ethics of banking, as if we have always expected that bankers go about their business day to day living by some strict moral code.

Let’s be clear. Wall Street and especially its surviving behemoth, Goldman Sachs, has a lot to answer for. The industry needs to take a hard look at itself for its deranged behaviour in the years before the global financial crisis. And public inquiries like the current hearings are key to getting to the bottom of it.

It appears that Goldman in particular was selling products which it knew were so high risk that they were willing to bet they would lose money.

But most of us would admit we wouldn’t smell of roses if our private conversations with friends and colleagues were suddenly dragged into the open.

It’s no secret that journalists say some horrendous things in the course of their work.

But what does a surgeon say about his patients while they’re cut open on the table?

And you can bet some astounding things have been said about clients by barristers, or about constituents by politicians.

The US military has been on the receiving end of this recently too, with whistleblowing site Wikileaks publishing a video of a helicopter gun attack against suspected insurgents in Baghdad which killed two journalists and injured two children.

The incident had been extensively reported on and the subject of investigations before, but the emergence of the video showed the ugly reality of modern warfare. “Ha, ha, ha - I hit ‘em,” said one crew member. “Look at those dead bastards,” said another.

Not to equate Goldman’s activity with warfare but pulling a couple of quotes from any big messy situation and focusing on them as being representative of a wider problem is a bit like looking at the sun in the sky and saying it’s summer.

The danger is it will take focus off getting to the bottom of precisely why finance houses were so exposed when the US housing market collapsed and triggered an unprecedented global economic shockwave. There are more important lessons to be learned than the one about the dangers of putting something in an email that you don’t want anyone to see.

Most commented

11 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • H of SA says:

      03:17pm | 28/04/10

      Can’t expect much more from executive bankers. This isn’t a tall poppies thing as there are many good bosses out there. But some companies – well basically the job and person spec attracts people with personalities which are good profiles for anti-social mental illnesses.

    • xiaoecho says:

      03:20pm | 28/04/10

      Paul, if you think those warm lettuce quotes @Overheardinthenewsroom are horrendous you’re in trouble…....

      but I have to agree that a name like Blankfein could only have come out of central casting…......BLANKFEIN??

    • poor little dears says:

      04:34pm | 28/04/10

      This is little more than a with-hunt to appease the masses and make it look like the gubberment is doing something.

      The real blame lies with the government itself that failed to regulate the industry. You don’t let children play on a highway and then cry about them being hit by a car. You expect it to happen and you prevent them from playing there.

      Funny how no-one was complaining about this during the boom.

      No-one complained when loans were given to people with small incomes and a “balloon payment” at the end of a certain amount of time and anyone could see that they wouldn’t be able to afford the repayments.

      But these people wanted their shiny new homes and the government was happy to look like it was doing something and that the economy was going along strongly so they let it happen.

      When the inevitable occurs it must be someone else’s fault. Not the fault of the poor consumers that over-extended themselves. Not the fault of the government that permitted an unregulated economy to go unchecked.

      Nope, must be the fault of the banks. Banks who compete for income in a competitive marketplace in order to earn income and appease shareholders.

      Surely they would always act in everyone’s best interest?!?!?!

      Well, it must be their fault then when they behave exactly as you would expect them to behave…......

    • TrueOz says:

      06:43pm | 28/04/10

      poor little dear,

      You seem to suffer under the illusion that a lack of regulation is the cause of this problem. The real cause of the problem is that the government (through regulation) anoints the heads of a few (i.e. those with a banking license) to literally print (or digitally manufacture) money.

      Regrettably, people have become so accustomed to the government regulating every facet of life that they forget about accountability - via a free, unregulated market. The likes of Goldman Sachs would have been out of business decades ago in such an environment - one where consumers KNOW to be wary of promises that are too good to be true, and government (i.e. the tax payers) do not throw a lifeline to morally and financially bankrupt business enterprises. In a just society, the directors of organisations like Goldman Sachs go to gaol.

      Having run a prudentially regulated entity myself, I can assure you that regulations often allow directors to justify the otherwise unjustifiable. New (and supposedly tougher) regulations simply present new, more sophisticated opportunities for people who would otherwise be labelled as criminals to toy with morality and the rule of law.

      What we really need is for the government to get completely and utterly out of the way. They should shut down the reserve bank (or in the US, the PRIVATELY OWNED Federal Reserve) and just allow the market to decide who sinks and who swims in the world of banking and finance. Such a thing will never happen whilst government can tax their citizens via way of inflating their local currency, and borrow from the very institutions that they regulate.

      In the land of blind, the one eyed is king.

    • The Centre Punch. says:

      08:02am | 29/04/10

      @ poor little dears, You left out some sad, ugly, facts. There were some “Bears” in the market talking about “speculative bubbles” all along, among other things. Colgo’s colleagues in the MSM Main Stream Media ignored them along with all the politicians, bureaucrats, etc.

      Did you know for example that genuine “Devil worship” is common among some “international bankster” circles?

      http://www.henrymakow.com/facebook.html

      http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/nonedarecallit_conspiracy.pdf

      @ TrueOZ, spot on mate, if all those “too big to fail” businesses had been allowed to go broke, the more conservative, sensible ones left behind would have grown, other new start ups would have come along & the US treasury would have less debt.

      Regards the formersnag & swinging voter.

    • poor little dears says:

      08:48am | 29/04/10

      TrueOz
      Your assumptions rely on people being completely aware of the market and the deals they are signing. Sorry, but people are just too ignorant and stupid to know what they are doing. Hence we need regulations and consumer protection.

      While it would be great that we could have a truly free market there are too many reasons for why it would fail. The complete lack of trust would mean it would collapse in no time.

      The Centre Punch
      You’re right. There were some people saying something was wrong. They were ignored.

      http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/national-news/portfolio/2008/11/11/The-End-of-Wall-Streets-Boom?print=true

      http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/09/16/business/16primer.span.ready.html

      People love to consume. Now we love debt so that we can consume more and more. This ‘GFC’ was the inevitable outcome of overextending ourselves on worthless assets and trinkets without the means to pay for them

    • Daryl Saal says:

      07:57pm | 28/04/10

      One piece of good practice I recommend is to delete all previous history when forwarding an email. Years ago at work I sent a mildly risque joke to a work mate who sent it on & after about three more forwards it reached a person with an axe to grind. All those named in the chain of addressees had to please explain. Luckily as I said it was so mild that my Grannie wouldn’t have taken exception, so we didn’t get into any real trouble.

    • stephen says:

      02:57am | 29/04/10

      You perhaps have confused the cause of their problem with the symptom.
      The Banker’s e-mails were an outcome, or a manifestation, of their poor judgement.  The passing of information, really, was just chit-chat , but what damns them is their contempt for their clients. These Bankers were already guilty of moral misconduct before their messages were passed.
      Their messages indicated their feelings, not their motive.

    • Gerard says:

      07:49am | 29/04/10

      Paul: you don’t seem to have done much research into Goldman Sachs. They heisted how many hundreds of billions out of the US Treasury while 10000s lost their homes and the fatcats got big bonuses again.
      A heist made all the easier by the fact that at least 8 of the top heads in US Treasury were from Goldman Sachs! Sounds like an episode of the Simpsons it’s so wacky! There are somemore lessons to be learn’t from this but what are they Paul?

      And Paul, you are dead wrong about emails - bankers with this much power in the financial system and with their tentacles in the US Government can be as arrogant and blatant as they want.

    • DWest says:

      08:08am | 29/04/10

      The FBI warned of an approaching “epidemic” of mortgage fraud in 2004.CNN, September 17, 2004: “Rampant fraud in the mortgage industry has increased so sharply that the FBI warned Friday of an ‘epidemic’ of financial crimes which, if not curtailed, could become ‘the next S&L crisis.’”

      The FBI says that 80% of the mortgage fraud was induced by the banks, not the individuals seeking loans.Rocky Mountain News: “The FBI report said research indicates that 80 percent of mortgage fraud nationwide ‘involves collaboration or collusion by industry insiders.’”

      New York Times, January 22, 2009: “The senators noted that, by some published estimates, the Bush administration failed to replace at least 2,400 F.B.I. agents who were transferred to counter-terrorism squads. As a result, the F.B.I’s white collar crime units are currently down at least 625 agents from pre-9/11 levels, a reduction of 36 percent.”

      Former Secretary of the Treasury Henry “Hank” Paulson, who engineered the Wall Street bailout, was an extremely well-paid CEO of Goldman Sachs just prior to taking the helm of the Treasury.New York Times, March 31, 2006: “In his 32-year career at Goldman Sachs, Mr. Paulson has accumulated a $700 million equity stake in the Wall Street firm.”

      Goldman Sachs set aside $6.8 billion for bonuses in 2008, the same year in which they accepted $10 billion in TARP funds from the American taxpayer.CBS News: “According to a report from financial news agency Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs, for example, has set aside $6.8 billion for bonuses, and Morgan Stanley, $6.4 billion.”

      Yes the FBI might have been wild eyed about a conspiracy too?  Crazy theories. Or do you know better than the FBI Mr Colgan?

    • PKelly says:

      08:18am | 29/04/10

      Good to see good old fashioned socialism is rampant in the land of the free! Socialism is THE most profitable model for some (Goldman Sachs) - this is the lesson! Capitalism is for losers.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter