When Vogue published its February 2011 profile on Asma Al-Assad, the English-born first lady of Syria, her husband’s totalitarian regime already had blood on its hands. 

The face of Syria as seen by American Vogue

President Bashar al-Assad has ruled Syria since the death of his father, Hafez al-Assad. They are members of the Baath Party, Arab nationalists who have ruled Syria under “emergency law” since 1971. Under emergency law the government can arrest people without warning, launch police operations against suspicious citizens and jail them without trial.

Yet Vogue, the glossy bible of all things fabulous and fashionable turned a blind eye. Describing the regime as “not as secular as we might like” while salivating over Asma Al-Assad’s long-limbed and analytic beauty. A “desert rose” in the heart of Syria. It’s the safest country in the Middle East, they cooed.

But how many people could Vogue really have fooled? The elaborately worded, evocatively photographed feature was nothing more than a political ruse. Albeit a clever one.  Designed to cloister the brutal, bloody and shocking reality of life in Syria and apply a sheen of “humanity” to the totalitarian regime. A country voted by Human Rights Watch as among the worst offenders of human rights abuses in 2010.

According to The Atlantic, the Al-Assads paid American lobbying firm Brown Lloyd James, a hefty monthly fee to arrange the Vogue feature, in a bid to boost the country’s public image. Their chosen subject: the first lady of Damascus, the “city of shadows”.  It wasn’t their toughest assignment. Asma Al-Assad is an intriguing subject, beautiful and powerful. The British born daughter of a London cardiologist, managed a successful career in investment banking before marrying Bashar al-Assad in December 2000.

But as the PR company quickly learned, you might can’t stage manage an entire country on the brink of destruction. Just weeks later, as the democracy protests continued, Vogue deleted all traces of its glowing feature from the internet. Along with most other interviews or profiles that shone any light on life behind the scenes of Syria’s first family. By the end of March the entire country was swept up in the shocking and widespread bloodshed. If not the beginnings of civil war.

The revolt was sparked by a protest against the internment of a group of small town children arrested for anti-regime graffiti. People took to the streets only to be fired on by government forces. You can read the full detail here in this very detailed Q&A by The Daily Beast.

One year later and the fighting and bloodshed continue in Syria. Approximately 7000 people are believed to be dead. Although the United Nations claim they stopped an official count at 5400 last December because they were no longer able to “verify” accurate numbers.

Daily news reports tell of endless shootings, dire shortages of medical supplies and food. Blackouts, random street violence and children who are kept inside their houses for fear of being shot in the streets.

The Syrian army, the only armed force operation in the country remains committed to the President Bashar al-Assad and members of the minority Alawites faith. They fear losing power and are expected to amp up their already brutal, bloody and violent methods of social control.

“I don’t see a hopeful situation on the horizon unless the UN acts,” Professor Amin Saikal, professor of political science at the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies at the Australian National University told The Punch.

But the United Nations remains divided on Syria. Russia and China have ruled out cooperation. They have made large economic and political investment in Syria and don’t want to upset the balance of power in the region. Without their consent, the rest of the World has no choice but to wait. And watch the bloodshed spiral out of control.

Expensive, tripped up PR can’t save Syria now.

Most commented

61 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Bill says:

      04:53am | 15/02/12

      Since when did Vogue become a serious, respectable publication?

    • Nathan says:

      05:19am | 15/02/12

      When the regime finally collapses Asma Al-Assad can face what ever is coming to her i will not shed a tear for this witch.

    • TChong says:

      06:33am | 15/02/12

      Glorifying murderers is nothing new.
      Despite being up to her elbows in blood, Condi Rice was often given girly glamor publicity, because she wore flash clothes and plays the piano.
      Similar for HRC.
      The crimes of US presidents are also ignored. George senior and junior, and Obama are will never be held to account for the mass murder they have unleashed.
      Regean, for no stategic reason, other than for US prestige had Panama and Grenada invaded, many died. But Regean has a library named after him, so lets forget his crimes.
      the charming Prince Harry is now qualified to fly Apaches, and he was BEST !!!! in his class at killing targets ! Wow !
      Anyone who can use a multi million dollar copter in order to kill some one defending their country, is obviosly a kingly chap.
      The list is endless.
      The hypocrisy is , unfortunately, not even an issue, any longer.

    • Nathan says:

      07:40am | 15/02/12

      Spot on the policies of the US need to be questioned allot closer. Regean is no hero at all, his and others actions in Latin America is morally reprehensible let alone illegal.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      07:59am | 15/02/12

      Always thought the same, but the difference in this is that her husband is killing his own people and shes on the cover without a care in the world.

      Poor option by Vogue.

    • Bill says:

      08:47am | 15/02/12

      Chongy - you’re lack of understanding is breathtaking at the minimum and a massive concern at worst.

      So you have a problem with the brave men who flew aircraft to defeat the nazis who were only ‘defending their country’?

      Educate yourself and you’ll be opened to the real world.

    • Joan says:

      08:54am | 15/02/12

      It`s one thing to train and be prepared to defend your nation and to take up arms to defend your nation but It`s a special brutal type of murderer and army that   tortures and turns guns on and kills own fellow country men , women, children - who are mostly defenceless- all for power sake . There is a big difference.

    • TChong says:

      09:17am | 15/02/12

      Bill
      please do educate
      and the “brave men who flew planes at the nazis”
      What is that about?
      Condi Rice and the Neo - Cons werent defeating nazism
      The residents of Fallujah , Grenada or The Panama, amongst others,didnt practice genocide, or threaten the US.
      Simon and Joan, no offence, but what difference is there in who is dropping the bombs. ?
      For Grenadians , or residents of Fallugah murdered by US aggresion is hardly more acceptable, than Syrians or Bahranians being killed by their own compatriots.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:21am | 15/02/12

      @Bill

      Where did he say anything to do with WW2?

    • Blind Freddy says:

      10:20am | 15/02/12

      But . . . but . . . they are OUR evil bastards.

    • Micky G says:

      10:34am | 15/02/12

      @SimonFromLakemba, Bills point is reasonable. TChong said “Anyone who can use a multi million dollar copter in order to kill some one defending their country, is obviosly a kingly chap”..
      If TChong is implying that attacking people on the ground from the cockpit of a multi-million aircraft is reprehensible, Bill asked if Chongy felt the same way about the pilots of WW2 planes bombing Germany. Its a reasonable question.
      The world isn’t warm and fuzzy. There are people (and nations) out there who play by different rules and sometimes men have to make decision to stop them. I wish it wasn’t like that but it is. Wouldnt it be great if Germany hadn’t invaded sovereign nations in the 1930’s, and Japan hadn’t attacked first in the Pacific, but they did, so people need to train to be prepared in case it happen again. Its just the way it is. Dont criticise the guys who put their hand up to fight though…

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      10:57am | 15/02/12

      @Micky G

      Long bow to draw, you have to take it in context as he was talking about Harry. WW2 is a long way away from whats going on in Afghanistan and Iraq.

      Correct, the world isn’t warm and fuzzy and agree with the rest of your post.

    • gobsmack says:

      06:37am | 15/02/12

      “Under emergency law the government can arrest people without warning, launch police operations against suspicious citizens and jail them without trial.”

      That’s pretty much what our own anti-terrorist laws permit.

    • Erick says:

      07:27am | 15/02/12

      @gobsmack - “That’s pretty much what our own anti-terrorist laws permit. “

      No it isn’t. It’s wild exaggerations like this that destroy the credibility of your cause.

    • gobsmack says:

      07:43am | 15/02/12

      @Erick
      1. I don’t have a “cause”.
      2. You are the last person to accuse others of “wild exaggerations”.
      3.  I doubt that you have actually read the anti-terrorist laws first hand.

    • Nathan says:

      07:46am | 15/02/12

      @gobsmack
      Your right, i should worry about our army blowing up my home any minute now. Douche

    • Erick says:

      08:13am | 15/02/12

      @gobsmack - Pretty much everything I say can be documented, and often is. I provide links to external sources, unlike you do.

      Australian laws do not allow people to be jailed without trial, except for those who are denied bail while awaiting trial. It is simply a falsehood to claim, as you do, that our anti-terror laws can jail people “without trial”.

    • gobsmack says:

      12:55pm | 15/02/12

      @ Erick
      The accused in the Melbourne terrorist case were held for more than 2 years in Victoria’s harshest prison conditions before the trial even began:
      http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VSC/2008/80.html

      Those eventually found innocent spent almost 3 years in jail.

      20 years ago the West could take the moral high ground in condemning the despicable Assad regime, pointing out that citizens in Western democracies enjoyed the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair and expiditious trial and other basic freedoms and liberties.
      Since then, those freedoms and liberties have been significantly eroded using the same grubby “means justifies the end” arguments that dictators use when imposing emergency law.
      The moral high ground we occupy now isn’t so high.

      @Nathan
      It seems the school you recently left failed to teach you either manners or basic reading comprehension.

    • Jon says:

      06:38am | 15/02/12

      Be careful what you wish for, there is no guarantee what comes after Bashar al-Assad will be any better. Remember this is the Middle East not the gentrified streets of the inner city.

      And yes, the UN is useless!

    • acotrel says:

      07:00am | 15/02/12

      With most middle eastern revolutions, the top bloke might get toppled, but the nasty bastards simply shift their allegience to the new guy, and the system is still as corrupt as it ever was. The internet might make a difference, if the revolutionaries actually seek democracy to replace authoritarianism, but the religion is a stumbling block.

    • John says:

      07:02am | 15/02/12

      The UN does nothing but make it legal for some countrys to wipe out other country’s. Look at what happen to Libya, NATO criminality carpet bombed the killed thousands of civilians. They also aided, funded and directed war criminals. It’s just the same tactic they are using in Syria but they have been vetoed.

    • Jon says:

      07:36am | 15/02/12

      acotrel@ Agree, and in the Middle East religion has always been the stumbling block. Strangely the negative impact of religion is hardly mentioned by many in the media.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      08:02am | 15/02/12

      America will find a new puppet to put in their like many before.

    • L. says:

      11:30am | 15/02/12

      “Look at what happen to Libya, NATO criminality carpet bombed the killed thousands of civilians. “

      No, NATO selectively targeted their targets with LASER guided bombs just to save colaterials.. Do you have any proof of this alleged “carpet” bombing..?

    • Adam says:

      03:09pm | 15/02/12

      Some carpets may have been damaged in the Libyan bombing but I hardly think they were actually trying to bomb the carpet, so how can there be any proof?

    • John says:

      06:51am | 15/02/12

      So what the US, British and France leveled and carpeted bombed Libya and brought and brought Islamic fundamentalists to power, how much blood has been spilled by the cabal rule that the west in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya? Who ordered the hits on Iranian scientists. It’s most likely up to 1 million people have been killed by western cabal army’s either by military weapons, sanctions and the destabilization of their nations by phoney democratic so called up risings, which is just more cabal rule over their country.

      It’s pretty clear the west is trying to destabilize the middleast for the interests of a few. They are trying to weaken Hezbollah, Syria and Iranian unity, the people behind this Syrian uprising most likely lead back to the white house. The real matter is the people really causing the death and destruction is the US, Western Media(by marketing it) and it’s pure evil allies.

      Now that Russia and China stooped the Wests death and destruction plans in the UN, NATO criminality inc didn’t get to create their no fly zone to bomb the Syrians like they did to the Libyans, so they are having a cry because they don’t get slaughter. The Syrian’s might have blood on their hands, probably not but France, Britain and US has 100 times more blood! The west has no moral high ground.

      I wish all the worst of luck for the western military that are trying to overthrow governments in the middleast, military defeats and financial destruction. This evil has gone far enough.

    • SteveKAG says:

      07:32am | 15/02/12

      Seriously John (or whatever your real name is).
      x files was in the 80’s mate.  When are people you going to grow up and wake up. 
      If it was not for the west (Australia, America, EU etc….) the world will be living like the dirt dwellers in Afganistan.  If the west is so bad why are you living in it?  Move overseas, who cares!

    • Nathan says:

      07:43am | 15/02/12

      @SteveKAG
      ” If the west is so bad why are you living in it?  Move overseas, who cares!”
      Did it take you long to think that one up? He never said the west was bad he said the foreign policy is questionable and it clearly is. Every person should care how others are treated, if you don’t put simply you are a selfish bastard

    • SteveKAG says:

      08:02am | 15/02/12

      @Nathan i have seen your comments on here, i think you need to find a new home also. 

      I pesonalyl don’t care for the G8 type of crap you both carry on about, the west is the spawn of all evil and the facilitators of wars etc… 
      You need to move to a country that is more attune to your thinking…......maybe somewhere out of the west.

      PS i do care about what happens in other countries i jsut don’t buy into your bullshit that it is always America’s fault like you do.  So i am not selfish but i am also not stupid and single minded.

      Wkae up buddy!

    • marley says:

      08:17am | 15/02/12

      @John - do you even understand what carpet bombing is?  No one has carpet bombed Libya.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      07:03am | 15/02/12

      Hi Lucy,

      President of Syria Mr Bashar Al Assad and his wife Asma Al Assad most certainly do make a handsome couple. Very much like the glossy cover of the Vogue magazine, which I find totally overpriced, full of advertisements and lacking substance sometimes, no offence anyone intended to the dedicated Vogue readers at all. I sadly find this very similar to the actual position of the President and First Lady of Syria, most unfortunately.

      Asma Al Assad is not your typical Middle Eastern woman at all, for once she does not choose to wear the hijab, I am guessing because of her background.  What does that really say for some countries in the Middle Eastern region in general?  There happens to be one rule for the very wealthy and another for the not so wealthy. 

      Before this actual photo shoot, I have had a chance to see the First Lady during some overseas trips on TV.  I was pretty amazed at how different and free she managed to seem during public outings, compared to the majority of the Syrian Women. There seems to be very definite contrast, when we start making comparisons about the life styles of women on both sides.

      I am just wondering why are the people of Syria questioning the very regime they have lived under for more than forty years?  Also is it any different to Saudi Arabian countries being ruled by the same families for generations? Another question would be that “is it also any different to what we had witnessed from March 2003 to December 2011 in Iraq?

      At the end of the day, it all boils down to the fact that, some nations like Syria in the Middle East Region, for the first time ever, are showing the signs of their discontent with the very system which was put in place decades ago!  Most apparent things happen to be a greater divide between the very rich and very poor. Because most people in Syria are finding it very hard to come up with true answers, which will satisfy the most felt hunger of being heard.

      Only when we address things such as poverty, lack of social freedoms,  educational and job opportunities, especially among the young generation in Syria, only then we might be able to get the whole picture!  Kind regards to your editors.

    • Gregg says:

      09:18am | 15/02/12

      @Neslihan
      ” Asma Al Assad is not your typical Middle Eastern woman at all, for once she does not choose to wear the hijab, I am guessing because of her background.  What does that really say for some countries in the Middle Eastern region in general?  There happens to be one rule for the very wealthy and another for the not so wealthy. “

      She is only a middle eastern woman by virtue of having married the Syrian President and other than that has spent her life elsewhere.
      It says very little about the middle east in general other than that the President also does not wear muslim style robes as many in the middle east do.
      It could be because of he leading the Batthist Party, same mob that Saddam was associated with, the strong arm boys of Syria and Iraq it would appear.
      As for one rule for the very wealthy and another for the not so wealthy, welcome also to Australia.

      ” I am just wondering why are the people of Syria questioning the very regime they have lived under for more than forty years? “
      And you do answer that in part yourself re poverty and then in more recent times they have seen what has happened in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya and despite all the violence enough have decided enough is enough and so enough have decided to attempt the seeking of what they hope will be a better life.
      Will it be a better life is another question and then how will they go about making things better and how long will it take are other questions.

      ” Also is it any different to Saudi Arabian countries being ruled by the same families for generations? Another question would be that “is it also any different to what we had witnessed from March 2003 to December 2011 in Iraq? “
      The Batthists have been in power only in Iraq and Syria and you ought to have a read up on Baathists and SA to appreciate the differences, Iraq obviously brought on by external forces.

      At the end of the day, it all boils down to as you say the gap between the rich and poor, poverty, unemployment and the communications around our planet now bring visions of alternate living to all.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      09:49am | 15/02/12

      Hi Gregg,

      Thanks for your lengthy & interesting reply!  Unless you happen to be a woman from Islamic & Middle Eastern backgrounds, you might actually find this topic a bit difficult to grasp.  It is very much like reading “Peace & War” by Tolstoy about the Russian Revolution without actually living it. 

      You can read all books you choose to, but I still think that we do not become experts at the politics involved in the Middle East region overnight.  Unless you happen to have a few years experience reporting from the actual hot spots in the Middle East Region, we will not be seeing eye to eye, most unfortunately.

      Things are much more complex than what we get to see on News Networks.  FYI, I do not think that in Syria they have a social welfare system like ours.  Happy reading!  Kind regards.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:58am | 15/02/12

      A lot of Pakistani’s elite don’t wear the Hijab, same as many other women in high class around the Middle East.

    • bella starkey says:

      10:00am | 15/02/12

      War and Peace was written 50 years before the russian revolution.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      06:59am | 16/02/12

      Hi Bella Starkey,

      Thanks & my point exactly!  There are always certain events leading up to revolutions!  They do not actually happen overnight,  very unlike what we might have imagined & witnessed just watching News Networks. 

      Just like we have seen in our recent past, sometimes an average of 35 years or so!  I am so glad that you have actually read the book as well. Kind regards.

    • TChong says:

      07:06am | 15/02/12

      With allies like AlQueda and the US, simultaneosly, the syrian opposition sounds like a group that deserves backing.
      Just like Libiya and Egypt- both resounding sucesses so far.

    • james says:

      08:25am | 15/02/12

      Just because AlQaeda has called for the overthrow of Assad does not make them allies. Al Qaeda has called for the removal of all Middle Easterrn secular governments. The idea that we should leave these people to be slaughtered (over 6000 now) by their government is reprehensible. Its opinions like yours that allowed Srebrinsta and Rwanda to happen.

    • John says:

      01:15pm | 15/02/12

      Al-Qaeda is fictional.

    • marley says:

      01:24pm | 15/02/12

      John is fictional.

    • Anna says:

      07:30am | 15/02/12

      What about Marie Clare’s article a couple of months ago about Vladimir Putin. It included details on “Putin’s Army” the bevy of beautiful russian girls stripping to show their love for the Russian leader, also comparing the Russian leader to a James Bond, international man of mystery figure. There was no mention of Russia’s human rights abuses or continued efforts in the UN to protect regimes like Assad’s Syria.

    • Lucy Kippist

      Lucy Kippist says:

      08:59am | 15/02/12

      Anna, you’re exactly right, that Putin piece was similar to this one about Asma Al-Assad. And there’s probably a whole stack of others just like it. I’m sure it’s not a new phenonomen. But it’s always interesting to know when a regime/country actually pays for stuff like this.

    • Chris says:

      10:33am | 15/02/12

      And there was that Woman’s Day feature of Julia Gillard.

      Sorry, couldn’t resist.

    • ALM says:

      12:37pm | 15/02/12

      Queen Rania of Jordan is another example. She goes on Oprah talking about helping the impoverished etc but at home in Jordan her family are tyrants in disguise. I actually saw a kid rummaging through a dumpster while a big billboard of Rania and her husband was right next to him. People are afraid to speak out and the govt. makes sure the public service sector is enormous so that the people are reliant on the govt for employment. Lots and lots of injustice and nobody cares because Rania had some plastic surgery and looks quite attractive to western standards therefore she must be alright.

    • stephen says:

      08:01am | 15/02/12

      There’s a lot at stake here too for the First Lady, because she may have married Assad not for anything else than a photo shoot.
      But she is now lying to protect them both, and the writing now is on the wall.

    • AdamC says:

      08:10am | 15/02/12

      While I don’t like Baby Assad or Baathist Syria, I am a little concerned at the path this Syrian crisis could take. The US, France, the UK (and others) have already managed to assist in the overthrow of a secular, if highly authoritarian, government that was beginning to become cautiously pro-western in outlook. Now, it seems Libya is in play, with islamists well-placed to take over national leadership. You could say pretty much the same thing about Egypt post the Arab ‘Spring’.

      Of course, Assad is an avowed enemy of the West, so we have little to lose by his removal. However, what will become of minority Alawites, Christians and others if a, typically xenophobic, Sunni government replaces the current ultra-nationalist, socialist administration? Being a minority in the Middle East is not a particularly pleasant experience, by all accounts (with the possible exception of Israeli Arabs.)

      Having said all of this, aside from pulping vacuous puff pieces about the glamorous ladies Assad is sleeping with, what can any outsider nations really do about Syria?

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:45am | 15/02/12

      “what can any outsider nations really do about Syria? “

      Nothing, that’s the big issue here. UN goes in they will be dragged into a war, America will no doubt get dragged in their with them.

      I read today that the Arab League is thinking of arming the opposition as sort of what happened in Libya. This is a potentially dangerous move as when this happens the other groups join in for fun and then you have the left over problem of the remaining arms.

      Its a shame about Syria though, so much tradition and culture there, so many different backgrounds/religions.

      Hopefully it can turn out like Tunisia which has come out of this relatively OK.

    • AdamC says:

      10:34am | 15/02/12

      Simon, indeed. And then you have the complication of Syria’s close relationships with Iran and Russia. The Syrian conflict is starting to look less like a popular uprising and more like a proxy war. These don’t have an exalted history of success in the Middle East!

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      11:11am | 15/02/12

      @AdamC

      What does have a history of success in the Middle East?

      Only thing that has been, is Israel - but with the help of the whole Western world.

      The Muslim religion and the part it plays is the big killer, it was a big part of the over throw in the 50’s along with the Golan Heights incident.

      I don’t fear for Christians too much as they play a big part in society there and a lot of them are high profile business owners.

      Interesting point is that the Ba’ath party was made by a Christian along with two Muslims.

      The worst thing that ever happened to the Iraqi Christians was the war.

    • L. says:

      11:34am | 15/02/12

      “Of course, Assad is an avowed enemy of the West”

      Is he..??

      You do know that the Syrians actually deployed troops against the Iraqis ( thus helping the coalition) during the first Gulf war, and activtely assisted allied soldiers escape capture of the Iraqi army..??

    • James1 says:

      11:55am | 15/02/12

      At least if the conservative Sunni religious elements take control, the Syria-Iran close relationship will die.  My concern is that this will push Syria closer to the Wahabi and Saudi Arabia, which would probably be far worse than what we have now.

    • AdamC says:

      12:09pm | 15/02/12

      Simon, I think you have a rather inaccurate understanding of Israel’s history. It is only relatively recently that Western governments have asssisted Israel, and then we are basically talking about the United States. Which, I might add, is a major financier of the Palestinian Authority, along with the Europeans.

      And the Copts haven’t fared too well in Egypt after that country’s ‘revolution’.

      L, the Middle East is a funny place, I’ll agree.

      James1, indeed. There is suspicion that the Turks and, especially, the Saudis are already arming rebels. There could be no doubt as to why.

    • AdamC says:

      12:10pm | 15/02/12

      Simon, I think you have a rather inaccurate understanding of Israel’s history. It is only relatively recently that Western governments have asssisted Israel, and then we are basically talking about the United States. Which, I might add, is a major financier of the Palestinian Authority, along with the Europeans.

      And the Copts haven’t fared too well in Egypt after that country’s ‘revolution’.

      L, the Middle East is a funny place, I’ll agree.

      James1, indeed. There is suspicion that the Turks and, especially, the Saudis are already arming rebels. There could be no doubt as to why.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      12:43pm | 15/02/12

      Turkey has always had in interest in Syria going back to the Ottoman empire. I think Turkey has seen all these revolutions going on and are now trying to get their hands into it.

      @AdamC

      Wasn’t bagging Israel was simply pointing out that they have had more backing and friendly conditions from the west then the other Middle Eastern states.

      Yes the Palestinians get money, goes back to what I said a few months ago, if yo took the money from both sides I think they would work out their problems pretty quickly.

    • Gregg says:

      08:50am | 15/02/12

      ” Punch Starlet ” !
      Lucy, our rose of ????
      Whatever and no matter how well you analyse or how long legged you are, keep it going.
      How long has the starlet tag been around, just noticed it!

    • Ras Putin says:

      09:14am | 15/02/12

      What has all the killing in Libya-Egypt-many other countries in that area achieved? It seems to me that all that has, and will be achieved, is a different brand of Islam, and the same B.S..will continue!  Get rid of ALL religions and we will have a better world…

    • Gregg says:

      09:29am | 15/02/12

      The US is pulling out of Afghanistan earlier, no surprise with that announcement seeing as an election is coming up.
      So with the problems south of the meditteranean, to the east and still further east, hopefully it’ll not extend too greatly to Indonesia, just the most populous Islamic country.

      But then we’ve just had the Punch article on Sharia punk haircuts in Aceh.
      It used to be reds under beds but the future red crescent of Islam might just get bigger and bigger
      Shiiite, Australia might be an extension of the Indonesian archipelago.

      Could it even be that we will see more and bigger boats coming down from the north as financial problems in Europe increase and poverty, unemployment and over population explode in all that region south east from Europe.

      Who you goin to call
      Call the boatbusters!

    • Herrin says:

      10:41am | 15/02/12

      If she had any self respect she would be grovelling and apologising about what has been done to the Syrian people.

      Al-Assads dictatorship has been absolutely ruthless and murderous in this treatment of this uprising.

      Her smile disgusts me.

    • Peter says:

      10:45am | 15/02/12

      Your criticisms of Vogue sound very valid.  But I am forced to ask how often you have turned a blind eye to dishonesty, deceit and evil for the sake of your agendas?  Integrity in our modern world is rather rare.

    • Your Welcome in Whale says:

      01:31pm | 15/02/12

      She looks like Natalie Barr from Seven Sunrise
      Only Madonna reads Vogue as its too expensive for Sydney Siders and Melbourne Demons!

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      08:11pm | 15/02/12

      Does anyone remember Julia Scourge of Australia, had a photo shoot & a 60 minutes shoot, not different

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @PSyvret: As if anyone needs reminding of the bigoted pond-scum out there, this arrived in my in-box this morning: http://t.co/Lfu5ntmq

Daniel Piotrowski

@christoforpaine hope youre OK.. and the bali trip is still on!

Paul Colgan

RT @BusInsiderAU: WATCH: Will Smith Does A Fresh Prince Rap Reprise On British TV - http://t.co/Filsoi00AT

Paul Colgan

ping @TheStalwart - Ireland looking at phasing out Apple's tax arrangements http://t.co/fZESvMZJsW

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter