We live in troubled times. The economy is scrambled eggs. The atmosphere is as full of hot air as the Rudd government. Chk Chk boom chick Clare Weberloff’s 15 minutes of fame is extending disturbingly beyond the 15 day mark.

What a relief, then, to wake after this weekend and discover that a familiar order has returned to the sporting universe.
Tiger Woods won his 67th golf tourney. Federer won his 14th Major. England lost the unlosable cricket game. And Barry Hall lost the plot.

Here’s the thing: I’m actually on Barry’s side this time.
Watch the above YouTube link.
In that one minute, 56 second video there are three distinct 50m penalties.
Penalty one: The initial free kick, awarded to Hawthorn’s Jarryd Roughead, was for holding the jumper. Hall blew up, and conceded 50m.

Verdict: A fair cop on the initial call, although it was by no means clear cut. Hall claimed his arms were held, an argument that was not without legs, so to speak. No arguments, though, with the 50m for dissent.
Penalty Two: The second penalty, awarded for felling Roughead looked suspiciously like gamesmanship by Roughead. Hall was still clothes-lining his arms in disbelief after conceding a 50m penalty for the first offence, when Roughead appeared to run into him quite deliberately. Let’s just say that if an oil tanker had stood where Hall was, Roughead would have found a way to miss it.

Verdict: A match report today said Hall “slung Roughead to the ground”. Uh-huh. Just like Lucas Neill slung Fabio Grosso to the ground in the 2006 FIFA World Cup.
Penalty Three: The third penalty, for elbowing Hawthorn captain Sam Mitchell, was impossible to dispute. That said…

Verdict: The 50m decision was technically correct, but someone should have a long hard chat to niggle-monger Sam Mitchell about what it really means to be an AFL captain. Running up to an opposition player with an inane grin on your face probably isn’t it.
So where now for Barry?
In the short term, obviously the doghouse. Though probably not the tribunal, where last year Hall copped seven weeks for decking West Coast’s Brent Staker, after which he spent serious time on the shrink’s couch.
Beyond the short term? That’s for Swans coach Paul Roos and Hall himself to decide. But if Hall draws a premature end to his career, who could blame him?

For years now, he’s been treated like a man with a rash by umpires.
There was a classic case in the third quarter yesterday, where Hall was denied a mark when the umps said he grabbed Robert Campbell’s jumper. Honestly, Marcel Marceau in his prime made stronger hand contact.
One explanation for why Hall cops the white maggots’ constant wrath is that the game now is littered with small forwards. So when a big bloke like Hall uses his bulk to win the ball so easily, the umps instinctively sense mischief in the air.
The other reason is his past record. Cricket umpires, often unwittingly, will give a batsman out LBW after two very close calls. It’s the “two halves make a whole” mentality. Hall, because of who he is and who he’s been, is effectively always on his last chance the minute he takes the field.
It’s all a shame, really, as Hall is nowhere near as bad a bloke as many would make out. I’ve only met him twice, but we had an exchange in our first interview which always makes me laugh.
Hall, as you may know, is a keen gardener. So I asked him what kind of plant he most resembles.
“A cactus,” he said, with the big, wide grin of a man pleased with his response.
Unquestionably, Hall is a prickly character. But it’d be a shame if this weekend’s events mean his career is spiked before its time.

5 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Richard says:

      09:58am | 09/06/09

      The main point of the article is correct - Hally is a target of umpires, and could well leave the game as a result, which would be the game’s loss.  Just one important disgreement (apart from the graturitous rubbish about the Rudd Government) - the first 50 metres was typical of the precious little flowers the umpires have become, and the fact that they pay far too many 50 metre penalties for incredibly minor incidents.  Hall did not swear at the umpire or abuse him in any way - he simply pointed out (correctly, as it happens) that his arm had been held.  Should this really constitute grounds for a 50 metre penalty?  Of course not.  I cannot see why merely disagreeing with an umpire’s decision, as long as it is not accompanied by swearing or abuse, should be grounds for a penalty of any kind.  What is this, North Korea, where the views of the dear leader cannot be disagreed with?  Ridiculous.

    • Ben says:

      12:41pm | 09/06/09

      I’d suggest the man who held the premiership cup aloft last September has a fair idea of what it means to be an AFL captain - and like it or not, an “inane grin” to gain a competitive edge is most certainly within his remit.

    • Az says:

      01:51pm | 09/06/09

      What we really have here are two separate issue balanced like a ton of feathers and a ton of bricks - the problem is two-fold.

      Firstly. THREE 50s IN A ROW?!?! That is fair dinkum an umpire brain-snap. Seriously. Why didn’t the umpire simply kick the goal for the Hawks himself. Giving a side 150 metres of advantage is like giving a six point head start. Oh wait, he did.

      Secondly. Yes, Baz is a target BUT y’know what a thinking person does when they’re being shot at? They keep their frickin’ heads down. Perhaps if there was less porkchopery and more excellent AFL-ery some of the heat would die down. Yes? Yes.

      PS. Okay so chinning lil’ Sammy Chickenhawk wasn’t clever but at least he got off. However, why does Ben Cousins cop a huge fine for giving the bird to camera that ISN’T A PUBLIC FEED and which is arbitrarily put to air by a TV network?

    • Michael says:

      03:33pm | 09/06/09

      give up on the fabio grosso stuff. it’s boring. terrible mistake by lucas neill. clear-cut penalty in that environment.

    • Bradley says:

      05:11pm | 15/07/09

      Turns out Sharwood was bloody right… again. **hmph** Good bye big bad Bazza! You were great to the fans for two reasons: terrific footballer and a car wreck… both for which we couldn’t take our eyes off ya mate. How bitter sweet.

      As for you Sharwood, make any predictions about the Pies that I don’t see coming and I cancel my subscription (well, actually, you know I dont mean that!). Keep up the awesome articles!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter