Middle income earners will contribute about $1 a week to a one-off levy on annual income with Julia Gillard today vowing Australia will “pay as we go” for urgent flood recovery work.

Full steam ahead with the re-building effort. Photo: Gary Ramage.

The Prime Minister announced a funding package of which two-thirds would come from spending cuts and one third from the levy of 0.5 per cent of taxable income for those earning more than $50,000 a year.

The Government will invest at least $5.6 billion in repairing damaged caused by floods in three states, with an immediate $2 billion going to Queensland, the worst hit state.

The levy would raise about $1.8 billion.

Ms Gillard told the National Press Club in Canberra an average income earner on around $60,000 a year would pay an extra $1 a week to the fund in the 2011-2012 tax year.

Someone on $100,000 a year would pay just under $5 a week extra. A $200,000 salary would see a $24 weekly contribution.

Ms Gillard pledged to also scrap a number of carbon-reduction programs and renewable energy projects, including the $430 million cash-for-clunkers scheme aimed at getting dirty vehicles off the road.

She said that for every $1 raised by the levy, a further $2 would come from savings.

But Ms Gillard made clear she would not sacrifice her policy priorities, such as the National Broadband Network, and the promise of a Budget surplus by 2013.

“In a growing economy, we pay as we go,” she said.

Ms Gillard said: “I see what needs to be done and I will do it. We will rebuild.”

The Government has used the flood crisis to dump a number of programs which threatened to cause more trouble than they were worth, the cash-for-clunkers scheme a prime example.

Other doomed programs include the Carbon Capture and Storage Flagships, the Solar Hot Water Rebate, and the Solar Homes and Communities Plan.

Ms Gillard said the Government’s priority was to put a price on carbon, and dismissed the programs as being “less efficient than a carbon price”.

The Government hopes to counter the shortage of skilled labour by encouraging the unemployed to go to flood-hit areas, and speeding up the arrival of skilled temporary migrants.

133 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Tracey Conlan says:

      01:37pm | 27/01/11

      Your comment:I agree with Tony Abbott - Just another tax helping those that don’t deserve the help. The Liberal party position of letting those now suffering continue to suffer, without infrastructure is completely justified and consistent with all their past policies.

    • Nafe says:

      02:33pm | 27/01/11

      QLD Infustructure is QLD problem. People with no Insurance is their own problem, They played Russian Roulette with Mother Nature, and Mother Nature won.

    • Peter Oataway, Hay, NSW says:

      02:35pm | 27/01/11

      It is hard to take a government actively spending hundreds of millions of dollars in the middle of a national flood, trying to buy low security farm irrigation water licences, serious about cutting the fat from the budget to help flood victims. So they took the easy option another tax.
      My house value here in Hay, NSW has gone down about 30% since the government started to buy back irrigation water.
      Pardon me if I don’t seem to be to thrilled at the prospect of paying this tax considering my local towns economy is going to hell in a hand-bag due to the Gillard government spending money (irrigation cuts) in an area I wish they wouldn’t.
      Spending it on fixing flood damage would be more welcome in my point of view.

    • MarK says:

      02:36pm | 27/01/11

      Your comment:I agree with Julia Gillard - Just another tax hurting those that don’t deserve the hurt. The Labor/Green coalition party position of making those now suffer continue to suffer with increased taxes and charges, without cause or necessity is completely justified and consistent with all their past policies and spend and tax methodology.

    • Charlie says:

      02:46pm | 27/01/11

      Nafe- acctually considering the massive tax windfall and jobs from QLD mines, rebuilding the infrastructure is in everyones interest- sadly that doesn’t fit into the tory talking points your running off today.

    • Mattb says:

      06:20pm | 27/01/11

      The people that are going to whine about this levy are the same people that have been whining about the stimulus spending, the same people that received their $900 bonus payment and quickly and quietly trotted down to the bank to cash the cheque then turned on the government as soon as the cheque cleared claiming it was ‘wasteful, labor spending’.
      Well guess what folks, the time to give some of that $900 back has arrived. Just think of it as ‘the government gave me $900 a year or two ago to hold onto for a rainy day, and that day has arrived, now it’s time to give some of it back for the good of a few aussies that are doing it tough at the moment’. It’s as easy as that, no need to whinge about it….......

    • Z says:

      06:57pm | 27/01/11

      How about delaying the 43 billion dollar NBN in Qld and using the savings to fund the rebuilding infrastructure.  Priorities folks.  And good to see age old labor mentality at play here…when in a pickle…TAX TAX TAX.

    • john says:

      10:36pm | 27/01/11

      Dumb ass Nafe .Queensland problem is Australia problem.We are still one federation country under a federal government.

    • Sherekahn says:

      08:49am | 28/01/11

      Nafe!  Naff off mate.  I suspect our ‘nation’ is being diluted with immigrants.
      It would be fascinating to know how many ANZACS could be counted in the country’s population today.
      On TV a shiny-headed man from Melbourne said, (sort of) “if they can’t afford insurance, let them eat cake!”
      We Queenslanders would willingly exit the federation if we could put a wall up to keep out southerners from bludging on our resources.

    • Bill Door says:

      01:40pm | 27/01/11

      I’m just over all the bitching going on. People need to understand that the money donated was for the people of Qld. The levy, as Gillard pointed out, is to re-build infrastructure. The levy is no to bail out people with no insurance.

    • Dash says:

      02:49pm | 27/01/11

      And the federal ALP has already demonstrated that it’s so good at spending the taxes we already pay them Bill? I’m sick of being robbed by this incompetent bunch of idiots.

      We’ll make your groceries cheaper, we’ll make your fuel cheaper, we’ll give you more affordable housing, we’ll give you cheaper better childcare, we’ll give you a coastguard, we wont touch the private health tax rebate, there will be no carbon tax, we’ll build 260 childcare centres, we’ve got an East Timor Solution, We fully support PM Rudd.

      Am I the only one who keeps smelling a pile of bullshit from this government?

    • Mike T says:

      07:08pm | 27/01/11

      @ Bill.

      Hey Bill I dont think many on here have a gripe about donating money for the QLD people (i would be horrified if the govt didnt act to be honest). People are peeved as to why the Govt didnt/couldnt find another avenue when the cost of living is pretty high for people at the moment.

      To give you an anology. It’s like the drunk/Gambler that blows his whole pay packet on the first day then asks you for some money to feed his kids…... of course you are going to help, because you dont want the kids to suffer…. but you are going to be down rght dirty as to why the idiot drank and gambled ALL of his money away???

      Julia is the drunk/gamble in case that wasnt overly clear.

    • Wilson says:

      05:17pm | 28/01/11

      @ Dash

      The average worker has received $24 per week in income tax over the last three years and you are whining about have to give one dollar back this year to help out.

      The “what has anyone ever done for me” attitude of the right makes me sick.

      The rate of inflation growth in groceries and housing has slowed so they are becoming more affordable. Childcare is cheaper due to rise in the rebate from 30% to 50%.

      The Howard government policy that taxed low income earners to subsidise higher income earners private health insurance policies was obscene, and just another example of Coalition perks for the rich at the expense of the masses.

      How can Abbott justify his support for the overly generous maternity leave levy that pays high income earners $75k for having a baby, while opposing a levy to rebuild damaged community infrastructure?

    • Wilson says:

      05:44pm | 28/01/11

      Correction:

      The average worker has received $24 per week in income tax (cuts) over the last three years and you are whining about hav(ing) to give one dollar back (per week) (next financial) year to help out (with the flood recovery).

    • Ryan says:

      01:44pm | 27/01/11

      “But Ms Gillard made clear she would not sacrifice her policy priorities, such as the National Broadband Network, and the promise of a Budget surplus by 2013.” means that she will not sacrifice a thing for those affected by the floods, especially not her little election stunts! Disgusting!

    • The Badger says:

      03:04pm | 27/01/11

      Guess you missed the part where the government is cutting spending to fund the majority of the costs.
      Your partisan politics in the face of this rebuilding from the flood devastation is what’s disgusting.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      03:11pm | 27/01/11

      Yes, this is a bit poor but no more than we have come to expect. There is no reason the NBN can’t be put off for a few years. We could also do something about all these illegals lobbing up; the cost to investigate them and house them while they are investigated is huge. Just stop the boats and we are already a billion dollars a year better off. 
       
      And how about we get the $900 plasma bonus back by way of a tax grab on those who received it? It was a bonus in times of plenty, but now the shoe is on the other foot. Get it back at $90 a month for ten months and there is the rest of the money required for flood repair.

    • Ryan says:

      03:23pm | 27/01/11

      @The Badger: oh please, pull the other one you rusted on Labor troll who sits on here day after day insulting just about anyone who does not tow the party line. What is low and plain downright disgusting is putting the NBN and the budget surplus AHEAD of the people in need in Queensland. Then again I don’t expect a pollie like you to get it. Insult away troll.

    • Mattb says:

      04:52pm | 27/01/11

      Haha, classic, hit a nerve there eh Badger!, looks like Ryan failed to read the entire article with his ‘she will not sacrifice a thing’ rant
      Badger-1
      Ryan- 0

    • The Badger says:

      05:01pm | 27/01/11

      Yes ryan
      anyone who doesn’t agree with you and buy the lies and innuendo you conservative troll spew out is a troll.
      At least you made me laugh

    • John says:

      05:49pm | 27/01/11

      Never met a Labor voter yet who knew who his father was unless his mother kept receipts

    • Peter Oataway, Hay, NSW says:

      06:01pm | 27/01/11

      @Tony of Poorakistan ..I agree about deferring the NBN to a point
      IMO they should continue to lay out the spine to all regions/towns of our nation and hook up schools, hospital’s, police stations, local council chambers..they should hold back on hooking up every dwelling

    • Ryan says:

      06:28pm | 27/01/11

      @The Badger: sigh the postings under pseudonyms just continue to show how low and pathetic you will stoop. Quite sad really, I do feel sorry for you.

    • john tracey says:

      06:36pm | 27/01/11

      tories only want their mothers and their fathers in graves so that they can live forever on the welfare money their parents provide

    • Ryan says:

      06:52pm | 27/01/11

      @john tracey: wrong country buddy, there are no tories here, I guess you stuffed up the UK then in that haze of pot smoke made a run for a safer place like Australia, what happend mate, get beaten up in Bradford for being white?

    • Wondering says:

      07:00pm | 27/01/11

      John Tracey seems to go feral after about 5pm. Is that because ‘he’ has only just slid out of bed, or is it because he’s been downing booze all day, smoked a heap of pot and ‘his’ brain is like scrambled eggs?

    • Steve Smith says:

      04:13am | 28/01/11

      Ryan
      What is disgusting is Tony Abbotts political point scoring on the backs of flood victims and the flood ravaged States of Queensland and now Victoria.
      Tony Abbott is a waste of space,along with his Liberal colleagues, feeding of the public purse,while pretending that he cares for the Australian people that he is hoping will elect him one day as Prime Minister in the near future.
      In truth, Tony Abbott only really cares about himself and his desire and ambition to become Prime Minister one day,and the only election stunts is coming directly from Tony Abbott and the rabble that calls itself the Liberal Opposition.
      The(still living in the 50’s)  Liberals are only envious of the NBN because in 12 years of Liberal Government, they never brought it in, or even thought of bringing it in.
      All the Liberals were only worried about returning huge,massive surplusses,at the cost of failing to fund infastructure,schools,hospitals and other vital services that they allowed to run down during their 12 years in Government.
      Then they brought in workChoices, that helped their big business mates more than it did the ordinary workers,and Anti terrorism laws which saw Australian citizens locked up for being either alleged terrorists, or locked up,deported for being falsely assumed as being illegally in this Country.
      The current government has had to pay for the past mistakes made by the former Liberal Goverment in way of compensation payouts to these people.
      Dr Mohamed Haneef ,received a substantial compensation payment for being falsely locked up as a terrorist by the former Howard Government in 2007
      Cornelia Rau(an Australian citizen) received around a $2.6 million compensation payout for being falsely locked up in detention under the Howard Government.
      Vivian Alvarez Solon received around a $4.5 million compenstation payout for being illegally deported(she too was an Australian citizen)
      How can the Liberal party be justified as calling themseves good money managers when they have cost Australia so much during their 12 year reign of Government,and is there any more compensation payments that will have to be paid out because of the former Liberal Government failing to investigate and make sure that they had all the right facts in front of them, before they locked away Australian citizens or falsely accused and locked up people as being involved with terrorist.
      You talk about election stunts Ryan, but the haste in which Howard brought in these draconian laws,The children overboard and the Intervention into Aboriginal Tribal Lands, by the former Liberal Government was all Election stunts by John Howard and the Liberal National party..
      Another fact is Ryan, that Tony Abbott was part of that draconian Liberal Government,and he still may the same ideas that his former Leader instilled in him.

    • Reg says:

      07:47am | 28/01/11

      Ryan the whinging pom, loses by a knock-out. smile

    • Ryan says:

      09:00am | 28/01/11

      @Reg (oh I mean the Badger under another Pseudonym) if you really think those many disproved and weak arguments put by Mr Smith are a knockout punch then you have a lot to learn.
      Political points scoring and claiming that Mr Abbott only cares about himself.. well I see his is a RFS volunteer, a surf lifesaver VOLUNTEER and is the only person that saved us all from the previous carbon tax attack, clearly thinking about himself unlike our esteemed prime minister who stabbed her closest working mate in the back at the very first opportunity, all the while BAREFACED LYING to the public that she wasn’t going to do it.
      There is no need for this tax right now but we all know that Labor would not let a good crisis go by without capitalising on it, especially since they have used it to dump all the back room policy deals with the greens and effectively stab them in the back (something Gillard is well versed in) and definitely not sacrifice any of her little election stunts.
      As for wasted money, please don’t even attempt to compare this government to the Liberals, the Liberals have a LONG history of paying off LABOR debt, there isn’t one Labor government in history capable of paying off its OWN debt so don’t make me laugh.. pathetic attempt, try again Badger.

    • Reg says:

      10:57am | 28/01/11

      I am flattered beyond belief.  Wow! To be put on the same level as the Badger, my day is made I’m off to the pub to celebrate. . smile Nah sorry, you’re not the best one to judge mate, I am falling into dejection again.

    • Confuse a POM says:

      11:21am | 28/01/11

      Look Ryan
      I’m over here now————>

      Poor ryan, can’t respond to the comments, always wants to attack the individual with insults.
      ryan, it’s about the comments, do you understand? who says them is irrelevant - get it?

    • Ryan says:

      07:35am | 29/01/11

      @The Badger: I am about as far away from a pom as you can possibly get, but nice distraction from my points.

    • Against the Man says:

      01:51pm | 27/01/11

      So another tax, oh well the suffering it brings will teach this country a lesson - don’t vote ALP. Learn the hard way twits smile

    • Tracey Conlan says:

      02:17pm | 27/01/11

      Well said - a tax to help those in distress makes me sick. I am proud to be selfish - I am proud to hoard my dollars.

    • StefanR says:

      02:22pm | 27/01/11

      The tax is alleviating suffering, not causing it. You twit wink.

    • James1 says:

      02:50pm | 27/01/11

      Anyone who suffers because they pay an extra couple of dollars each week deserves to suffer.

    • James1 says:

      02:54pm | 27/01/11

      I should add, I am against this levy on principle, but stand firm in my disdain for anyone on $60 000 a year who would be suffer from giving up $1 a week.  What in the name of Christ are you doing with the other $1600-odd you get after tax?

    • Paul says:

      02:59pm | 27/01/11

      Tracey, what about the taxes I already pay? If the ALP hadn’t wasted them on fixing the insulation debacle or allowed it to be rorted under the school halls program, they wouldn’t be asking me for more. This is not about helping people (many of us have already donated) this is about incompetent government ripping more away from the people who already pay the most in tax.

      If the government used my taxes wisely in the first place I wouldn’t mind. But to rip more away from me just because they haven’t got a clue how to run the nations finances is a joke!

      It’s yet another bloody disgrace from the worlds worst government!

    • Fantasy Island says:

      03:05pm | 27/01/11

      Little johnny would have just pulled the dosh from his sock draw.
      bring back little john.

    • Richard says:

      03:13pm | 27/01/11

      Don’t be snide, Tracy “Troll-lan”, money doesn’t come from thin air.

      Yes, I know thebenbernank thinks it does, but the truth is that wealth has to be generated in the real world, and that takes hard work, and the ones responsible for generating it should be entitled to retain the lion’s share of it.

      There simply comes a point after you’ve kept piling tax upon tax upon tax upon tax onto the poor shoulders of the wealth producers when enough is enough.

      At what point do you think it will come to that stage?

      50%? 60%? 70%?...

      80% (including the silent tax of inflation which comes from government budget deficits, which erode the value of dollars already in circulation and thus impact the poor the most)?

      Private Enterprise and the workers employed by it are the beasts of burden which generate ALL economic progress in this country, how much heavier a load do you think they can carry?

    • Adam Diver says:

      03:24pm | 27/01/11

      @ James1, I usually like your points.

      But it doesnt matter if its one dollar a week, that is one dollar a week on top of all the other taxes and cost we face. If that was the basis for every decision we would have hundreds of taxes imposed ASAP.

      Besides the amount is not the issue, its the fact that the tax-payers are lumped with a bill, that should be covered through normal fiscal means. Look at the litany of stupid programs they are all too happy to scrap. It annoys me that people in positions of responsibilty, particularly fiscally, never face thier mistakes.

      Look at Rudd, so bad that he lost his job, on a tax-payer gravy train for the rest of his life, or the current NSW Labor Party.

    • James1 says:

      03:36pm | 27/01/11

      Fair call Adam, which is why I would (and do) oppose such a tax on principle.  As you point out, who knows where this kind of business would end?  Its logical extension is to add to the tax burden dollar by dollar as events dictate, which is in no one’s interests.

      I don’t mean to say we should support this new tax - my point was more directed at those who think this move will cause suffering.  That reeks of hyperbole, but I fear they were entirely serious, which to me spells out a lack of personal and fiscal responsibility akin to that of our present government.

    • Grumpy says:

      03:36pm | 27/01/11

      I guarantee you a liberal government would have done the same thing.
      Either party, their both shit!

    • Z says:

      04:27pm | 27/01/11

      ATM, don’t expect the majority of Labor voters to object to this tax.  It doesn’t apply to income earners under 50K or the unemployed…That makes up 80% of Labor’s voters doesn’t it?

    • Against the Man says:

      04:48pm | 27/01/11

      Yo Steffy you really think the money will be used to help QLD and those who suffered? It is naive voters that keep the ALP in business. This is an excuse to scam and cover up their loses. I keep saying if you want to say Howard introduced levies as well then please oh please tell me what Gillard has achieved as deputy and current fake PM that is comparable to Howard. Boat people still coming, doctors still unemployed and people still dead from the home insulation debacle.

    • Cashinhand says:

      04:52pm | 27/01/11

      James1,

      People on $60,000 get $1,600 in the hand, WTF!  You are obviously a Labor supporter with such a complete lack of understanding of the reality of money.

    • Bill Door says:

      04:57pm | 27/01/11

      @Against the Man

      Please explain why a levy now is bad. But the half dozen or more that Howard imposed, while the budget was in surplus, were good.

    • The Badger says:

      05:14pm | 27/01/11

      @ Bill Door
      Because it’s politically expedient and fits in with the party of NO’s main platform for change.
      just say NO

    • James1 says:

      06:26pm | 27/01/11

      Cashinhand,

      Arond $1600 per fortnight.  I thought that would be clear from context, but obviously you needed that to be explained.

      In any case, I don’t support Labor.  That should be clear from my posts, but perhaps not to you…

    • Joker says:

      08:33am | 28/01/11

      Did someone leave the gate open on the ‘Emoticon Paddock’ this morning?

    • fairsfair says:

      01:53pm | 27/01/11

      “Ms Gillard said the Government’s priority was to put a price on carbon, and dismissed the programs as being “less efficient than a carbon price”.”

      Wow. So she is taxing us in a one off and her contribution is the scrapping of polcies that will ensure her ability to tax us again.

      Look, I am all for helping rebuild my home state as well as infrastucture in others - but I just can’t get past the principle of all of this.

    • Grumpy says:

      01:54pm | 27/01/11

      Doesn’t sound so bad at all.

    • Greg says:

      03:54pm | 27/01/11

      You obviously wont be paying $24 a week when you already pay $65,000 a year in tax and $3,000 in medicare levy.

    • L. says:

      01:57pm | 27/01/11

      Hey, I know where theres another lazy $50 Million which has been set aside for a useless Labor initiative… The Internet Filter.

    • Ben says:

      01:57pm | 27/01/11

      interesting to see the carbon-reduction and renewable energy schemes were first up against the wall when the govt needed some money.
      Also guess im stuck with my clunker for a bit longer.

    • Marilyn Shepherd says:

      02:05pm | 27/01/11

      Spot on Tracy,  Why should those who grow our food get any help, let them starve I say.  WE don’t need the food, we can get it elsewhere.

      For all the bullshit about “the Australian spirit” the reality is that we have in the last 15 years become incredibly crude and selfish and the prevailing attitude is “f…....k you Jack, I’m alright.”.

      How on earth the rest of the country would not want to help hundreds of thousands of traumatised and suffering fellow citizens is beyond me.

      Of course the morons could save over $1 billion a year by stopping the illegal imprisonment of innocent men, women and children who seek our protection.

      After all, as the DIAC website shows, it is just an application form, imprisonment is an illegal and expensive waste of lives and money and could build a whole mob of homes for those who lost everything.

      As for the Abbott mob, gotta love their Aussie spirit the most don’t you Tracey?

      Gotta love the notion that tax and spend is something new for a government when that is the entire reason we have governments but I do get so tired of this nonsense about a surplus.

      there is no legal basis or need for a surplus under our constitution which only allows for the raising of sufficient taxes to provide essential services.

      A surplus is organised theft.

    • nossy says:

      02:21pm | 27/01/11

      @Marilyn Sheperd - well said Marilyn - dont forget Howards Timor Tax we all paid dutifully !

    • Dash says:

      02:36pm | 27/01/11

      Marilyn, you are kidding right?

      I already pay a shit load of tax! If this joke of a government didn’t piss it away on insulation schemes, 2020 talk fests and lining the pockets of NSW ALP builders, they might not have to take more from us!

      People mind paying taxes when the government wastes it on crap policies, rorts and repairing their own mistakes!

      Could you tell me what would happen if we had nothing but defecit budgets Marilyn because my economics degree isn’t helping me understand your theory. How does Ireland and Greece look as a result of years of socialist ALP style governments? They are wrecked because of the type of logic you are using!

      How would your beloved ALP have dealt with the GFC if the LNP hadn’t paid off the $96billion of ALP debt, or left $26billion in the kitty for your idiots to splash about? How would the government have gone if it tried to borrow money without the Howard government having restored our AAA credit rating?

      I hope you don’t run your household budget the way you want the national budget run. Then again, perhaps you don’t care because my hard earned taxes are being redirected to you!

    • Susie says:

      02:46pm | 27/01/11

      No Levy.

      It’s a QLD state govt problem.  SA had to impose its own levy when QLD burned us and Victoria with its “i’m alright Jack” we have lots of water stunt a few years back when towns, business and environment was being slaughtered on the lower Murray.

      Australia has plenty of food from other states.  We don’t all eat banana’s with pineapples on our heads.

      ALP and Green voters can pay it.

    • john says:

      02:58pm | 27/01/11

      @nossy, you mean Howard had to clean up the mess that your mate Gough Whitlam left by leaving Timor in Limbo?

    • Conrad says:

      03:00pm | 27/01/11

      @ Marilyn

      I despise you lot who think that “not wanting to pay tax” = greed. We’re not all Capone’s instead the majority of us are living off the bare minimum now after cost of living is taken out of the weekly wage. 

      We are just angry that we put our faith in the Govt to help us out in a time of need, to have that rainy day fund that one would normally have for these types of situations.  We now learn that when we’re in a hole the Govt’s solution is to tell us all politely that we need to “dig up”.

    • Jim says:

      04:10pm | 27/01/11

      Marilyn ate the same mushrooms as nosthow did in the 60’s - they’ve been loopy ever since.

    • jf says:

      04:17pm | 27/01/11

      “A surplus is organised theft.”

      No more so than creating a massive, unmanagable deficit. They’re not taking it down the Casino and putting it on black.

      Better to run a small, conservative surplus (or deficit for that matter).

      Organised theft is taking many and mis-spending and wasting it on vanity projects, particularly where it could have been more efficiently and more productively been used by the private sector.

      Furthermore, any surplus money can be used next year.

    • MarK says:

      04:33pm | 27/01/11

      ”  nossy says:

        02:21pm | 27/01/11

        @Marilyn Sheperd - well said Marilyn - dont forget Howards Timor Tax we all paid dutifully !”

      Really.

      Please do tell exactly how much the East Timor levy raised.

      Be as precise as you can.

      Please.

    • Greg says:

      04:40pm | 27/01/11

      It is taxes that are legalised theft.

      The government coerces people under physical threat of imprisonment to pay for services that they don’t want or need at hugely inflated prices. It gives them an offer they can’t refuse.

      It’s exactly the same as paying the Mafia protection money.

      Of course I understand that Marilyn really intended to justify endless budget deficits. Maybe she thinks that there is a magic money tree somewhere, and somehow all these deficits won’t be passed on to the next generation.

      In other words, “I’m all right Jack, let’s spend the money now and give the bill to the kids to worry about”.

      This demonstrates extreme left wing ethics. Whatever it takes to live at somebody else’s expense, even if they haven’t even been born yet.

      And then they try to claim that they have superior morals to everybody else!

    • nossy says:

      05:20pm | 27/01/11

      @john - wash your mouth out with soap John talking about Whitlam like that ! But privately you are probably right ! hahhahhhhhhhhh

    • nossy says:

      06:49pm | 27/01/11

      @Jim - ahh the 60’s Jim - yes I do admit to “inhaling”! Never affected me though - sharp as a tack now the 90’s are here !  hahhahhhhhhhhhh

    • MarK says:

      08:48pm | 27/01/11

      How much did you pay for the Timor levy nosthow

    • Steve Smith says:

      04:45am | 28/01/11

      Jim,
      Marilyn and nosthow eating the same mushrooms in the 60’s?
      Eating the same mushrooms and being ‘loopy’ would surely have to be better than being ‘brain dead’ and continuely being drip feed the same diatribe from the Liberal/National party
      A big new tax,a big new tax,a big new tax,a big new tax, according to Tony Abbott.
      I’m sure if Tony Abbott continues to repeat the same words and lines over and over again like he is prone to do,then he may actually believe them himself,like his gullible supporters and cheersquad does.

    • Marilyn Shepherd says:

      05:04pm | 28/01/11

      Why do people like Dash pretend that the $96 billion debt was true when it has been shown endlessly that it was not?

      And why do they endessly go back to 1996 as if the past 15 frigging years have not existed?

      The GFC happened because of morons like Brown and Costello thinking Alan Greenspan was the greatest thing since sliced bread instead of the fool he has proven to be.

      Jesuse wept, the liberites live in bubble land.

    • poa says:

      02:10pm | 27/01/11

      This is an ALP tax. To save Gillard and Co.
      To be seen to be doing something for Queenslanders who hate them.
      How many seats did they lose in the llast federal election there?
      Where were they.
      Oh….so its about stiching up Queensland.
      And the Libs will look like mongrels if they object….at least to Queenslanders.
      To put in perspective…half a billion for schools in Indonesia and 5 for floods… How much in Conservative seat flooded Victoria.
      Oh…naff all eh.. But they lost…sorry. Guess Julia doesn’t care about safe Coalition seats down south.
      Bit of class warfare and slug the rich…well the whole Green theory is dead, and I suppose the focus groups have told Gillard this is a net vote winner (otherwise they wouldn’t do it).
      Pity that its all bollocks and those of us that donated to floods are feeling ripped off.
      Guess with NBN’s and BER’s and unwanted billion $ desal plants everywhere…another dive into Aussie pockets by the masters of disasters is just to be expected.

    • nossy says:

      02:12pm | 27/01/11

      $1 a week Malcolm and this paltry amount has bought the Redneck nutters out in droves ! Now remembering , as I keep poiting out, Howard imposed a Timor Levy on us way back in ‘98 I think it was and of course we all paid it - I did. So whats so different about a Flood Levy ? Absolutely nothing ! What we have here passing for an Opposition is a ragged mob of ex Howard govt hasbeens , including Abbott, and a bunch of newbies who dont realise they have joined a party now run by fruitcakes ! I have said in the past that if Abbott was ever PM Australia would be sent back to the 1950’s - I was wrong - make tthat the 1930’s !

    • fairsfair says:

      02:55pm | 27/01/11

      Disagree sorry Nossy. We as a nation had no control over the activities in Timor. For whatever reason it was deemed our involvement was required to assist in Timor’s recovery and we all had to pay. It was not something that was to be in our “budget”. Where I struggle is that disaster management and infrastructure spending should be. That is what we pay all that other tax for. Just like I have to budget my own finances to cope for disaster, so does the government. My issue with this levy is not that it is a levy or that it is paying to primarily fix Queensland infrastructure - my issue is that the governement has failed to protect us in this instance and they think it OK to just impose a one off tax to make up for their own financial irresponsibility. I don’t even have to pay it - I don’t earn $50k but I am offended by the principle of it. I am also offended that those directly affected by the floods don’t have to contribute. Yes, they have been through a lot and are doing a lot on the ground, but if this tax is to apply to fix their immediate infrastructure then it should not descriminate via locale or income. Everyone should have to pay. Even if you earn $25k ayear, you should be contributing 50c a week - something. People down south eat the produce that travels over the very roads this levy will fix, so I don’t get that objection. The objection I do get though is that this is mismanagement of a mega nature and they have some hide to think that people are going to take this, however misinformed or reactionary their opinion on the matter may be.

    • Jack says:

      03:09pm | 27/01/11

      $1 a week isn’t big, obviously.

      But would you continue to give $1 a week to a kid who then went and threw it through your glass window’s causing $30 worth of damage?

      No.

      My point is, the Govt treat’s $1 per week with the same gusto as $1billion per week and thats the f**ng problem!

      Its not the $$ we care about its the idiots who are asking for it.

    • Adam Diver says:

      03:48pm | 27/01/11

      @ Jack, this must be my day, your last line is a pearler, but cant be my comment of the day. I think you summed it up beautifully.

    • MarK says:

      05:12pm | 27/01/11

      “as I keep poiting out, Howard imposed a Timor Levy on us way back in ‘98 I think it was and of course we all paid it - I did.”

      As I will keep pointing out to you nosthow Howard proposed this levy but it never went ahead.

      You paid nothing

      No one did.

      At least if you are going to make some pointless justifications for Gillard attempting to get some money back in the coffers please at the least try and get some factual correct.

      “So whats so different about a Flood Levy ? Absolutely nothing !”

      I will let you answer the question you posed. Hint - the Timor levy cost you nothing. It never was implemented.

      Tell me what the difference is then.

    • nossy says:

      05:26pm | 27/01/11

      @fairsfair - loved your lead article in The Punch the other day FF ! Am waiting to be asked to write an “unbiased” one on Tones Abbott myself but the invite must have been “spammed: off somewhere !  hahahhhhhhhh

    • luke says:

      02:24pm | 27/01/11

      With household budgets already stretched, this tax will hurt all charities relying on donations from generous Australians. Soon, charities will be asking the government to increase the medicare levy to help compensate.

    • squarepusher says:

      02:25pm | 27/01/11

      Ignore Tracey Conlan, he is a troll who frequents Andrew Bolt’s blog.

      He is attempting to use reverse psychology to push his anti-liberal anti-conservative stance.

    • Daryl says:

      02:25pm | 27/01/11

      I already pay more than the average wage in tax to this joke of a government. And what do I get for it? To see it rorted under the school halls program and used to repair the damage from the insulation mess! Not to mention wasted on a 2020 summit talk fest, a sorry day photo opportunity and $900 handouts to dead uncle Bob. Now I have to pay more tax because they can’t seem to manage their budget. I wish the ALP would just get stuffed and leave me and my family alone!

    • Steve Putnam says:

      07:54pm | 27/01/11

      ’ A man who has tax problems has no problems’ Did you whinge this loudly when the previous government wasted $1.4 billion of tax payers money on helicopters that have never been able to fly as much as single operational hour for the RAN? Did you ask why the Howard government allowed public school infrastructure to crumble while it was throwing money hand over fist at wealthy schools for swimming pools, grandstands and rifle ranges? What was your response to the $290million used to bribe Saddam Hussein to buy our wheat despite the fact that we were at war with him?

    • MarK says:

      02:41pm | 27/01/11

      The first of three new taxes this year brought to you by the ALP = Green alliance.

      Also a cowardly and convenient weay to walk away from lies made prior to last election in order to gain Green preferences.

      Gillard is beginning to rival Rudd on the backflip numbers.

      Disgraceful acts by a politician bereft of ideas, policy or conviction. Everything is done on the run.

      What is the answer to any problem? Easy…tax it, go hard go tax. A joke.

    • Greg says:

      02:42pm | 27/01/11

      So corporates pay nothing? The family businessman splitting his income and declaring half of it pays nothing? The dole bludger pays nothing? And the educated, hardworking PAYG taxpayer gets slugged again!

      Socialism is alive and well in Australia!

      Anyone who votes Labor now is a fool! This needs to be blocked!

    • Lisa H. says:

      05:41pm | 27/01/11

      You’re joking, right? The family businessman generates much more than his own family’s income in tax!

      We beggar ourselves to pay the tax bill! We pay on behalf of ourselves, our business, and our employees! Any downturn means we still pay tax! The only people who don’t get paid in our business is us! It’s a great way to live your life!

      But I see we agree that Socialism is intrinsic to Australia’s simplistic notion of ‘fairness’, and that Labor is lost.

    • N says:

      02:57pm | 27/01/11

      I’m curious as to what Ms Bligh did with the $4.2B privatisation of QRN?

    • nosthow says:

      02:58pm | 27/01/11

      I was way out Malcolm in just nominating the Howard Timor Levy as the only levey imposed by the Liberals - have a look at this article as it lists ALL Howards Levies we all dutifully paid .
      A gun buyback levy
      A Timor levy
      A Dairy Indiustry levy
      An Anseet Employees levy ,,,,,  the list just goes on and on.
      And as the article says “And that’s before we get to the rank hypocrisy.

      Is this the same Tony Abbott who was a member of the Howard government cabinet, which used special purpose at every opportunity to fund politically expedient or unforeseen expenditure?”

      I rest my case M’lud !
      http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/politics-must-not-muddy-levy-plan/story-e6frerg6-1225993700197

    • john says:

      03:14pm | 27/01/11

      @nosthow….AND WINNER IS ....the 10% GST…“Taaddaaa”

    • Nick says:

      03:29pm | 27/01/11

      Yes there were levies imposed by the Howard government but the reality is we were given massive tax breaks not to mention bucket loads of middle class welfare( which by the way I was not in favour of).Unfortunately we are not doing so well are we nosthow? This government is running the country the same way my wife runs the household.Spend now and let someone else worry about it!

    • Ryan says:

      03:47pm | 27/01/11

      Yep but the MAIN difference here is that they didn’t go around blowing money like drunk uncles on stupid wasteful schemes. If the pink batts, grocery watch, fuel watch, BER rorts etc. etc.. didn’t exist then I am sure there would not have been an objection. We all know where this new tax money is going to go and it isn’t going into the Queensland infrastructure.

    • MarK says:

      05:15pm | 27/01/11

      SIgh….the Timor Levy was never imposed.

      Get some basic facts correct every once in a while

      “the list just goes on and on.”

      It hard for the list to go on and on when you have given the whole list especially given one of the list was never imposed.

      Just saying

    • MarK says:

      08:51pm | 27/01/11

      Look for yourself Bill.

      It ain’t hard. Either that or show me how much you paid. Should be a hoot.

      I love how the basic facts never get in the way of a good lie to prove a partisan point.

    • Goldenfaber says:

      01:26am | 28/01/11

      East Timor cost us about five billion dollars. It is irrelevant Mark K whether it came out of general revenue or a “levy”.

    • Christian Real says:

      07:55am | 28/01/11

      Nosthrow
      Simply love the way the Loyal Liberal followers and cheer squad attempt to excuse the fact that Howard was consistent in introducing levies during his 12 year reign in Government and that Abbott ,Hockey and other remnants of Howard’s Government condoned and approved of each and everyone of these levies imposed by Howard.
      Tony Abbott and his opposition should be condemned and not applauded for their attempt to political point score on this issue,for they along with their followers and cheersquad .
      Tony Abbott is a phoney, a fake that is easy to see through,and his only real concern is for himself,his cheap shots at the government is a blatant attempt to politically score points.
      Abbott appears to be unconcerned for Australians that have lost houses,loved ones cherished memories in the way of family photographs or other memorabilla.
      The fact that Abbott and his Opposition party is even opposing this levy, shows that they are unworthy to even represent Australians and they should not be getting paid out of the public purse to pretend that they are doing so.

    • Not convinced says:

      03:04pm | 27/01/11

      The real problem is the reputation this Government has earned as economic wasters.  It was very useful for them to spend the surplus put aside for a rainy day - but now the cupboard is bare.  The complaint that people have already dug deep for donations is valid - perhaps Mr. Swan could consider lodgement of receipts for flood appeals as evidence of payment of the levy?  After all, he is going to have the ATO trawling all over flood victims who are to be exempted from payment of the levy - but I wonder how this is to be established?  More bureaucratic form filling?

    • AdamC says:

      03:08pm | 27/01/11

      Have Gillard and, before her Rudd, ever met a tax proposal they didn’t like?

      It seems not. It makes it hard not to be cyncial, not to suspect that the flood catastrophe is being used to ameliorate some of the government’s current fiscal difficulties.

    • Imalleeringneck says:

      03:10pm | 27/01/11

      Typical labor ideology, take some more money from the taxpayer.
      The taxpayer is just a bottomless pit of money for them.
      Then they use management speak that you are not supporting the flood damage repairs.
      They could support it by scrapping the multi billion dollar NBN plan.

    • Goldenfaber says:

      01:42am | 28/01/11

      My tax rate over the last ten years (income tax divided by net income)....
      2000 0.2174
      2001 0.1907
      2002 0.1997
      2003 0.1973
      2004 0.1953
      2005 0.1962
      2006 0.1939
      2007 0.1831
      2008 0.1755
      2009 0.1618
      2010 0.15
      Looks pretty good really?

    • Reg says:

      08:37am | 28/01/11

      Thanks for that, an obvious downward trend since 2007 making the Howard years the high taxation years as everyone knew at the time. There’s plenty of room for a levy before Labor government taxation goes within cooee of the faux-liberals efforts.

      No wonder they didn’t want to implement the East Timor levy they’d planned for, even too embarrassing for Johnnie considering how he had overtaxed for years. A just in case levy. An embarrassment of riches derived from over-taxing.

    • Jim Peters says:

      03:11pm | 27/01/11

      The thing I find most disgusting about this is the way Gillard’s brought it in, all this “Give a mate a helping hand” rubbish to guilt people into accepting it. Please. This tax is simply to refill the Governments coffers after they’ve wasted so much on their failures over the last couple of years. The country shouldn’t be in a situation where it needs a new tax to cover this sort of situation in the first place. And now they’re taking advantage of Australian’s good-will towards the flood victims to make another tax grab.

      They seem to have no problem handing out billions of dollars in foreign aid each year. Half a billion of out dollars for Indonesian schools? Heres an idea, why not just stop sending money to foreign powers for one year and instead use that money to rebuild Queensland?

      Or what about diverting all those billions of dollars from new taxes Labour has introduced since coming to power into the flood crisis? The economy got along fine without the new taxes on alcohol, cigarettes, electricity, water, car registration etc. So why not use the massive revenue from them?

      But no, of course none of that will happen, we just get a brand new tax! In a time when the cost of living and and taxation has never been higher. Oh well, Australian’s deserve to be fleeced once again for voting these cretins in a second time.

    • Ryan says:

      03:30pm | 27/01/11

      Can you imagine Gillard giving a mate “a helping hand”, she sure gave Rudd a helping hand, squarely in the back with a very large sharp knife, hell Gillard would give her own mother a “helping hand” down a flight of stairs for ten bucks.

    • David C says:

      04:44pm | 27/01/11

      Its the Labor way, if you are against us you are a selfish, ignorant, uncaring, fascist, Palin loving right wing nut job.
      You see this tactic in most political discussions these days. its the favoruite tactic of bullies

    • Ryan says:

      06:26pm | 27/01/11

      @David C: you missed the usual “racist redneck” one also.

    • Giovanni says:

      03:15pm | 27/01/11

      I would be more than Happy to pay a levy if this stupid government hadn’t wasted all of my extremely hard earned tax dollars on stupid policies.

      It’s time to get rid of this stupid government. They are only in power becasue of the narrow view of 2 independants.

      Lets face it, Politics is all about what your parents taught you to vote anyway.
      How many of you ALP lovers come from Conservative parents or backgrounds?

    • Mayday says:

      05:04pm | 27/01/11

      The next Federal election will be just in time for us the judge how affectively the Flood Levy is being spent.
      Queenslanders are still not happy with the knife in the back, the ALP/Green/Independent alliance had better make sure the money is well targeted and spent wisely.
      Not holding my breath but will be watching very closely.

    • Andrew says:

      03:17pm | 27/01/11

      All taxes need to be discretionary based on how good a job you feel the government does.

      You think they are doing good - send them your money.

      You think that they are sending the country to hell in a hand basket - send them nothing (and give it to a whorthwhile charity instead).

      I know where mine would be going.

    • Gillard the self obsessed says:

      03:24pm | 27/01/11

      What struck me about Gillard’s announcement was the number of “I’s” and “me’s”. The woman is obsessed with herself.  Everything she touches turns to trouble. There’s a lot of anger about this tax, especially considering Gillard’s disgraceful billion-dollar track record. 
      However, I prefer giving our money to Australians than pouring buckets of it into foreign aid, and we all know how and where that money ends up.  Nothing would suit me better than to see all foreign aid stopped. 
      I don’t give one cent to World Vision (the bleating Tim Costello - at least his brother worked hard for his own country), Oxfam, Red Cross, Salvation Army or any one other of them. My spare cash goes to medical research.
      I wonder if all the generous people who gave money to the Queensland Flood Appeal will ever know exactly how it was spent.

    • Matthew says:

      03:27pm | 27/01/11

      Apparently the mateship that Australians demonstrate has a price tag attached.  Once again the tax receivers get off scott free and the tax payers get hit in the hip pocket again, because if you’re on $100,000 or more, YOU"RE RICH ... YAYAYAYAYAY

    • BR says:

      03:32pm | 27/01/11

      After contemplation, it is more than likely that this will be blocked in either the upper or lower houses. Consider this; LNP won’t support it, based on the thrashing Abbott is giving Gillard at the moment, the Greens will be extremely reluctant to support it, given that the levy implementation wipes out a vast majority of green initiative / incentives.

      It’s actually rather well played by Labor, they will appear to have tried to help QLD, but when it comes to getting this passed through parliament, it will be the other parties fault for not supporting it. Labor walks away squeaky clean, while the brunt of abuse from QLD flood devastated regions will be directed at LNP, Greens, etc…..

    • James1 says:

      03:55pm | 27/01/11

      Bob Katter probably will support it, so my guess is it will get through the lower house.  I can’t help but wonder if any National senators might consider crossing the floor on this one too, for the reasons you identify in your last sentence.

    • Tully01 says:

      04:02pm | 27/01/11

      @ BR says:

      Come on mate they are not that clever!

    • Greg says:

      04:15pm | 27/01/11

      The greens are a party of higher taxes. They want higher personal and corporate taxes. Just look at their web site. they will support it. And you don’t think there are dodgy backroom deals going on with the greens and independents? The independents will be there cap in hand again! This minority government is a fraud on the majority of hard working Australians!

    • MarK says:

      08:53pm | 27/01/11

      Katter has publically said he will support with a lot of proviso’s attached.

      He is still pissed when Nth Qld has natural disasters no one cares. Should be fun to see what he demands in return.

    • john tracey says:

      04:33pm | 27/01/11

      the Liberals believe the needy rich should pay no taxes .
      The Liberals believe that the poor should pay plenty of taxes to pay for the needs ,desires and wants of the needy rich.
      Rich people should pay Labor’s flood tax as the needy rich need the renewed infrastructure more than the undeserving mass media hated poor.

    • jf says:

      05:34pm | 27/01/11

      And herein lies the problem.

      Those mindless ALP supporters believe the rhetoric.

      Just about every ALP policy takes money from the poor and puts it into the hands of the middle class and wealthy.

      From paid parental leave and childcare rebates to carbon taxing, flood levy’s and stimulus packages money is going into the hands of the well off middle class.

      And this doesn’t include the botched schemes that enabled wealthy builders to bloat themselves on government money. Nor does it include the expense that over-regulation adds to the cost of living.

    • john tracey says:

      04:36pm | 27/01/11

      the rich must live more simply so that the poor can simply live.
      the rich are islands of affluence and influence in a sea or an ocean of poverty and effluence.

    • Dave-o says:

      04:47pm | 27/01/11

      So much mis-information going on here. Lets examine some facts

      1) Infrastructure. Rebuilding infrastructure will help everyone. The trucks that bring your fruit and vegies to Wollies/Coles each day use “FEDERAL HIGHWAYS” to deliver them. So if we don’t rebuild the roads we’ll pay more for our fruit and vegies. If we don’t rebuild our NATIONAL HIGHWAY system we’ll pay more at the store and see less dividends in our super from Wesfarmers/Woolworths. The railways,bridges and ports however are a state responsibility but they carry the COAL industries rivers of gold. While the COAL industry only employs around 2% of the nations workforce almost all of us reap the benefits of its ridiculous good fortune. People declared jihad when RUDD wanted to SUPER TAX the industry because everyone was scared s#$&less; about the consequences. But all of a sudden we need to invest to keep the rivers of gold running and people are balking. Its kinda like your taxi driver and your taxi breaks down. Its going to cost you a fair whack to repair. You refuse because you don’t whip out the credit card for the repairs, sadly though no more income.

      2) Queensland pays more per kilometre for the national highway system than Victoria, NSW and SA. There is a fairly tangible reason to this, Qld has the tyranny of distance to overcome and and less volume of traffic so lets not argue about the semantics of road funding. It is however indicative of how the federal government short funded lots of Federal responsibilities within the state while enjoying the “cake” of massive GST, corporate taxes and above average personal income taxes. They syphoned this money into sand-bagging mexican swing electorates with scant regard of the fairness of propping up bankrupt governments (NSW - Roozendaal you little worm I cant wait for NSW to send you packing you oxygen thieving waste of space)

      3)The cost of not rebuilding Qld will be felt either way, taxes from the region will collapse and welfare will increase. I never thought I’d see the day when people would rather dole bludger’s than gainfully employed citizens.

    • Mike says:

      04:54pm | 27/01/11

      What the hell did I donate “everything that I could afford” to the QLD relief effort for, if this was going to happen ?  I really feel like saying “I will NEVER, EVER donate to relief appeals again, I’ll just let whoever’s in charge tax me instead”.

      This has been handled appallingly.  Where is the carrot ?  There’s only a stick, and if you were a good boy and gave anyway, THWACK.

      Now the powers that be - not that I like any of them - are taking MORE from my pocket without my asking, despite the fact I gave.  How about “How bl**dy dare you” and how about “Go bother IAG, QBE, Suncorp, BHP, RIO and your big-end mates in town and ask THEM to donate what they can, hell, they’ve got more money than I have !”

      I don’t mind giving.  I just don’t like being TOLD to give when I already have done and given what I can.

    • John Tracey says:

      05:25pm | 27/01/11

      Your comment:
      The clear message is
      “Stop getting flooded so that others can save money”

    • Daniel says:

      06:46pm | 27/01/11

      Something smells very fishy about this levy. I think that it might be around for a longer period of time than they are talking about. Why do we need to pay it though? Australia could have had the full MRRT that the Greens were interested in delivering? I agree with Bob Brown. These extreme weather conditions and weather results were partly as a result of the big end of town polluters. I agree with Bob make them pay for it.

    • Reg says:

      07:36am | 29/01/11

      Daniel if you recall, back in 1996 when the faux-liberals feigned shock at the “blackhole” the previous government had left them, the cry was for higher taxation to fill in this apparition. Fair enough you’d agree. Well in spite of the extraordinary income from mining, the highest taxing government in the history of Australia, the Howard - Costello government, RETAINED that outlandish level of tax right up to 2007 when they were tipped out. Only then did the tax rate begin to drop down substantially, under the auspice of a Labor government. Eleven years to fill in any sort of “black-hole” is excessive against the background of export prosperity, largely derived from WA and Queensland mining I’ll remind you. 

      Now we have the tedious moans of the faux-liberals that Labor seeks every opportunity to slap on another tax. So let’s get this in perspective. The faux-liberals are building a case to discover another “black-hole” to justify a new round of excessive taxation when they once again take government. Don’t be deceived by the whinging levy deniers, the effort intended to assist people in tragic circumstances, is being subverted by the faux-liberals, for ulterior purposes. That is, to justify a NEW round of (Howard-Costello like,) exorbitant taxation levels, when the opportunity presents.

      Of course Tones, or who-ever takes his place, will hold taxation rates slightly below those of the H&C government so’as not to have the shroud of the highest taxing government in the history of Australia, slip from John Howard’s shoulders and descend upon his. Hope that helps.

    • Elizabeth says:

      07:57pm | 27/01/11

      I’d love to comment about how many people still don’t understand the levy, where it’s going to and why it is the best option. However, I just don’t think they’ll ever get it. Educate yourselves before passing judgement on something you don’t fully understand and instead just regurgitate hyped up headlines from the media. Seriously, where did the boat people argument come from? Go look at the stats and you’ll find that 90% of illegal immigrants come in on a plane!! 10% coming from the boats is marginal in comparison!  But at the end of the day, those in power, will do the right thing even if the Liberals can score a few points out of the uneducated from this issue. It’s a political play what’s happening in the media, think for yourselves about what Abbott and Hocking are saying.  Hmmm I can’t think of why the Liberals wouldn’t want the Labor Government to meet their surplus election promise by 2013 could I??? And I’m sure I can afford the measley $50 extra to pay this year when it helps to rebuild QLD infrastructure (to fix the roads and farms so that the rest of the states can have affordable fruit and vegetables, and other goods from the region).

    • Reg says:

      10:30am | 28/01/11

      Elizabeth no-one has mentioned the fact that NSW people get in a hump over the distribution of Commonwealth funding. That Queensland gets a share that they regard as rightfully theirs. It’s all part of the anti-Queensland thing. They wouldn’t be nearly as reticent if it was for Victoria or even WA. smile

      This is largely an anti-Labor agenda intended to fit in with the NO campaign and has little to do with a levy.

    • Frat says:

      08:01pm | 27/01/11

      How many levies/taxes did Howard introduce during his time? As for comments about letting people wear the cost of the destruction, come on you can’t be serious. A tax to rebuild infrastructure in a state that brings in vast amounts of dollars from its resources is not only sensible but an imperative. The donations are to help people, the levy is to build infrastructure. Why don’t some people actually read the article?

    • Bob ,Bill and the Marrionette says:

      08:40pm | 27/01/11

      It should not be forgotten that Gillard does not make these decisions,Bob Brown and Bill Shorten are at the helm Gillard is simply a Botoxed Token
      She claimed no responsibility for Policy stuff ups,too many to mention when she sat with her friend and colleague and yet to be assassinated K Rudd and the mouse pack(slithering group of scum lefties) things have not changed
      I would imagine she was told what to do and she has delivered for the Green/Labor coalition a new tax,really nothing to do with her
      The more you see of this woman the more apparent her lack of input,she cannot answer any question without instruction,a Puppet

    • The Real Tracey Conlan says:

      10:39pm | 27/01/11

      Gillard is a rolled-gold fool.

      So far out of her depth as an ambulance chaser for the Unions that is stomach turning to witness.

      NO LEVY. Gillard: NO FUTURE.

    • Reg says:

      03:50pm | 28/01/11

      The term is - “stomach churning” -TRTC.  You may as well get something for your puny efforts.

    • Marilyn Shepherd says:

      12:37am | 28/01/11

      It’s $1 a week for most, 50 cents a week for many, I do think you will cope.

      After all you fruitcakes you pay Costello’s GST don’t you and that was and is the biggest rort in history.  GST on essentials like power and phones is disgusting.

    • Reg says:

      04:01pm | 28/01/11

      I’m so pleased you didn’t mention the cake Marilyn. What do you think of the suggestion that all food be taxed and the funds raised be given to farmers as recompense for land care and to offset the gouging caused by the likes of Woolworths and others? I think it has some justification despite the apparent inequality.

    • kerry says:

      08:24pm | 28/01/11

      Yawn! Sigh! Give it a rest MarK
      To the chaps who keep insisting we paid a Timor Levy. You are wrong.
      “However, in the lead up to Budget 2000, a matter of weeks before the tax was due to come into effect, it was announced that the Timor Levy would be scrapped. The reason given by the government for withdrawing the Timor Levy was that the cost of Australia’s involvement in East Timor was much lower than originally forecast and the budget was in surplus” (see http://www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/sp/medicare.htm) - scroll down to the year 2000.
      Fact of the matter, MarK, Howard was getting a lot of flak, and then decided to scrap it. Everyone happy now?

    • Shelley says:

      10:36am | 30/01/11

      Do any here think it a tad tacky for the pollies to be getting another pay rise at this time?
      If Gillard put it to them that they refrain from accepting any pay increases( or even only half) for a year I’d be happy to chip in extra.
      Cutting costs from the budget in tough times by pollies not accepting a pay rise. Now that says we’re all in this together to me!

    • Andrew says:

      06:10pm | 02/02/11

      Greg says:04:40pm | 27/01/11

      It is taxes that are legalised theft.

      Then go and live in another country. It is conservative wankers that tell people who do not ‘conform’ to their ideal of Australia.

      The Government of the day decides how it is done. If you do not like it, do not vote for them. Better yet go and stand for election yourself.

      I would happily take the lot of you whining whinging complainers and dump you all on Jalalabad Road. If any of you were still alive in 24 hours you would beg to come back to Australia, even under a labor government.

      Get over yourselves. You and your best News Ltd mate Andrew Bolt really are a disgrace. You want to talk about Un0Australian, go take a look in the mirror.

      I bet you are the sort of person who in WWII would have been against anything that John Curtin did because he was a former Communist sympathiser.

      I will tell you what whingers. When every last one of gives back to the government every last dollar you receive in subsidy, be it negative gearing, health inssurance, child care and the list goes on. Then I will think you have a valid agrument. Otherwise STFU and start acting like adults.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter