I don’t have the research in front of me but, anecdotally, I have noticed that women use phones, fly on planes, shop and withdraw cash from ATMs.

Australian boards need less Johns and more Catherines. Pic by Colin Murty.

If my analysis is correct, you’d think the top brass at Telstra, Qantas, Westfield and the Commonwealth Bank would need to know a fair bit about women – a hefty chunk of their customer base and their workforce – and what makes them tick.

I’ve no doubt that these organisations employ many fine strategists, marketeers and consultants who can provide the kind of research that backs up my casual observations.

But when their exhaustive reports reach the top management ranks – and ultimately the board of directors – it’s a bunch of grey-haired blokes who decide how best to cater to the feminine customer base.

You shouldn’t generalise but my research suggests women are different to men when it comes, for example, to shopping and talking on phones.

And it’s this same cabal of baby boomer Davids, Johns and Peters that also deals with the needs and wants of female workers.

Telstra has just one woman on its 11-member board. (Admittedly, Catherine Livingstone is the chairman but she is still outnumbered five-to-one by men called John.)

Qantas and the Commonwealth bank have two women on their 11-member boards. Westfield, the biggest owner of shopping malls in Australia, has just one woman among 13 directors (though it does have two Davids, two Peters and two Stephens/Stevens).

It’s a scandal that women, who make up more than half of the population and 45 per cent of the workforce, are so under-represented on boards.

Recent figures, highlighted on The Punch last month by Sex Discrimination Commissioner Elizabeth Broderick, reveal that women make up just 8.3 per cent of boards in the top 200 stock market-listed companies.

Only 2 per cent of chairs are female and half of the nation’s top boardrooms are all-male domains.

Broderick has controversially raised the option of imposing quotas to “kick start this process of gender equality”.  (It worked for the Labor party, where women now make up 40 per cent of its federal parliamentary ranks.)

This week, the Australian Institute of Company Directors came out against quotas, saying you could not apply a “one-size-fits-all” approach to Australian companies given their diversity.

But, commendably, it did launch a major program to boost the number of women in Australian boardrooms.

The AICD recommends boards set targets for female representation – targets that suit their particular industry – and publish statistics on the number of women among its executive and board ranks.

The targets would not be mandated in law.

But if the goal – say, 25 per cent of board seats filled by women within three years – was not met, or the statistics were not published, companies should be compelled to explain why.

Critics will deride this form of self-regulation as useless but setting guidelines and publicly embarrassing companies when they fail to meet them is working on the vexed issue executive pay – albeit slowly and with a fair degree of resistance.

Among the AICD’s other measures to improve workplace and boardroom “diversity” include more family-friendly work policies, mentoring programs for female directors and databases of likely female candidates for board roles.

The chairmen of companies including BHP Billiton (one woman among 14 directors), the ASX (one of nine), Woolworths (two of nine) and the president of the Business Council of Australia (one of nine) have pledged their support to the plans.

The hope is that better representation for women at the top will have a trickle-down effect that will help close the gender equality gap at all levels of an organisation.

Still, you can discount the notion that corporate Australia has suddenly discovered a heart or is on an altruistic crusade to right past wrongs.

And you can forget the psychobabble about women bringing much-needed sensitivity, understanding and intuition into the hard-headed men’s club.

For a lot of the fifty-something blokes who still run the business world, getting more women on boards is simply good business.

We don’t need quotas – and the tokenism they represent – to improve the standing of women in boardrooms. But maybe the threat of quotas will be enough to make companies see commonsense.

The new drive for better female representation at the top of companies is belated recognition that they have failed to tap a huge source of talent and skills for their boards.

It’s recognition that they need more voices in boardrooms, voices that better reflect the diversity of the population and, critically, companies’ workplace and customer base.

And, frankly, it’s about time.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Most commented

46 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • John A Neve says:

      04:57am | 26/11/09

      Why should any private or for that matter public company be forced to employ any one?

      It would appear that when a journalist is short on ideas, the best answer is to revive an old debate and this is an old debate, very old.

      In a perfect world people would be employed based on merit. Sadly our world is far from perfect. But legistlation won’t fix this issue, in fact it will make it worse, token women will be sat on boards, much to the disatisfaction of shareholders and the general public.

    • Eric says:

      05:14am | 26/11/09

      Over 90% of prisoners are men. When are you going to write an article condemning this inequity?

    • Helen says:

      07:20am | 26/11/09

      John Neve, the only possible corollary to your statement is that you believe women are innately less intelligent or able than men. Since we make up over half the population and are currently kicking your arses in the education sphere, much to the grief of people like Eric up there, why is it that you think that there would only be “tokens” if there would be more women on boards? I wonder if you have a wife/partner and how insulted she would feel if she read it.

      The truth of the matter is that there has been a massive affirmative action program in favour of men since the Industrial Revolution and we’re just considering winding that back.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:38am | 26/11/09

      Helen @0820hrs.

      It seems you suffer from an inferiority complex! Nothing in my post comes even close to your interpretation. Come out from the shadows dear lady,

    • Eric says:

      07:54am | 26/11/09

      Helen, fifty years ago, when men outperformed women in education, feminists claimed it was because of discrimination.

      Clearly, if men lag behind in some areas today - such as longevity, imprisonment, and education - then that must be the result of discrimination too.

      So let’s see some action to even up the discrepancy in these areas.

    • Bob H says:

      07:58am | 26/11/09

      Yes more women in the pointy end of corporates.  I am sure they will have no trouble stuffing up, blaming failure on others,  gorging in the trough, sharing out the till between themselves and claiming ownership of success generated downstairs,  just like the men do.

    • Tired says:

      08:13am | 26/11/09

      ho hum…

      Lots of people who talk on phones are about 15 yearsold. When will you advocate increasing the number of young people on boards?

      Similarly, lots of consumers could be described as any or all of gay, lesbian, religious, agnostic, atheist, aboriginal, NESB, engineers, economists, lawyers, plumbers…

      Your analysis implies that boards cannot be adequate until every one is a demographic snapshot of the country, or at least of the board’s target audience? If not, what is special about this particular imbalance that makes your socks roll up and down? 

      While I’m at it, who i to say that the best person to ‘reach’ a member of any particular group (whether it be women, men or any other group) is a member of the target group itself. Isn’t that why people pursue education, to learn things they aren’t born knowing?

      I think there should be more women on boards, but this analysis is silly and weakens the arguments based on good reasons. Surely the ideal approach, what we wantpeople to do is this - determine their strategy and what they want from thir board. Then, having done that, choose the person most able to implement that strategy.

      We won’t be ‘there’ until this happens without anyone giving a moment’s thought to the gender (or any other ‘label) of the lucky winner (board member or job applicant)

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      08:22am | 26/11/09

      Those first few words should have warned me I was about to read crap!
      “I don’t have the research in front of me”
      You have done know research at all if you think that the majority would share your views. “Merit” is a word missing from your vocabulary and maybe you should reacquaint yourself with it before writing such garbage! You say we should threaten people to do things your way for their own good? How is it good business to just make up the numbers to appease fools such as you.
      Special business writer or just special….

    • Tim says:

      08:28am | 26/11/09

      Helen,
      seeing if as you put it, “girls are kicking boys arses in the education sphere”, i’m sure you would be all for a massive increase in education spending specifically for boys (boys only programs, scholarships etc). That would be equality wouldn’t it?

      And as for the author’s suggestion for more family friendly workplaces. Is this just another way of saying workplaces where its OK to be absent for random days every week because “the kids are sick.”

    • g says:

      08:32am | 26/11/09

      All this says to me is that women are victims and need
      our help to get on boards and committees.
      how about it being based on merit, isn’t that true
      equality?

    • Liz says:

      08:36am | 26/11/09

      Apparently Rivers have one third of the executive female despite their recent bad publicity.It’s a start.
      Did you know the largest cause of female death in Australia is caused by men who murder etc? Maybe that’s why 90% of prison populations are men!.

    • T.Chong says:

      08:40am | 26/11/09

      Evry so often a CA or TT type tabloid tv will feature a caryard, or similar type company that employs women sales people etc as they “care” and “know what women want” etc- LOL!!!!! As if these companies arent flogging rubbish and gouging the customer.
      Women largely run hospitals (Directors of nursing) yet thet are not put forward as wonderful workplace models. In fact, nursing is renowned for its worplace or “horizontal aggression” ie nurse bagging ,underminig nurses, and the protagonists(90%+) are female.
      There are great , good wonderful caring,sharing women and men, just the same as there are low life,domineering ignorant arrogant women and men.
      Very few of us are one dimensional cariactures.

    • Budz says:

      08:48am | 26/11/09

      Eric, if you feel so strongly about it, why don’t you write a well researched article on the plight of men in Western society?

    • Tim says:

      09:04am | 26/11/09

      Liz,
      Most females are killed by males murdering them? WTF!!!!!!

    • mid says:

      09:10am | 26/11/09

      @Liz
      “Did you know the largest cause of female death in Australia is caused by men who murder etc?”
      Where did you get that one from? As far as I was aware the leading cause of death for women, as it is for men, is heart disease?

    • Eric says:

      09:14am | 26/11/09

      Liz, that’s a total crock. Here’s some information for you:


      The top five causes of death for Australian females are: 15

      Ischaemic (coronary) heart disease – a form of cardiovascular disease;
      Stroke;
      Dementia and Alzheimer’s disease;
      Trachea and lung cancer;
      Breast cancer.

      From http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/Publishing.nsf/Content/phd-women-policy

      Feminists always have to make up stuff to get their point across, because reality is not on their side.

    • Eric says:

      09:17am | 26/11/09

      Budz, many well researched articles on the plight of men in Western society have been written. You can find them using Google.

      I don’t see any need to reinvent the wheel - rather, my purpose is to spread the truth.

    • AFR says:

      09:22am | 26/11/09

      Can we move onto a new topic? This is about the 100th article this month on this topic. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…...

    • G says:

      09:36am | 26/11/09

      @ Liz

      If the majority of the prison population is men, then obviously there is a problem.  There is major disparity between education and the socio economical status of men compared to women, and in part can be attributed to part of why they engage in criminal activites.

      Statistically men are more likely to be a victim of crime, there is substantial inequality in the areas physical health, men also have considerably higher levels of mental health issues and suicide rates, a lower life expectancy rate and lower education level outcomes.

      Unfortunately, they aren’t easy issues to deal with and hence are not dealt with at all or simply undrepresentated by the media, especially here at the punch.

      Women on boards strategies are positive and feel good, these have broad community support, it is an area that is relatively easy to address and is also effortless to write about.

    • Max says:

      10:23am | 26/11/09

      People are in jail because they have been caught engaging in a criminal activity.

      Don’t want to go to jail? - Don’t do anything illegal and keep your hands to yourself.  Even the most uneducated and underprivileged can grasp that basic concept.

      Men are overwhelmingly likely to be victims of other MEN.

      Sort out your own mess before you start telling women how to behave.

    • T.Chong says:

      11:15am | 26/11/09

      Max: the courts are a lot more lenient on females. If a female pedophile teacher/authority figure is convicted of rape, then the spin is that the perpetrator was just mixed up, looking for love.
      If the perpetrator is male than (rightly ) they are scum, and locked up as such.
      Same as women who murder- the standard defence is they are victims of violence, while the male victim cannot defend themselves from villification.
      Are you aware that the vastly overwhelming numbers of child abuse, whether thru neglect or deliberate harm,are committed by women?
      I cant wait for the day all women are shamed,and expected to be responsible for ALL female violence, particularly against children,the same as ALL men are expected to bear guilt about violence against women.

    • cats says:

      11:21am | 26/11/09

      I’m only 20, but I don’t ever want to be part of that boring and uptight business world. I’m happy leaving it to the men while I go and have some fun in my admin job. By the time my generation are old enought to join boards, there will be plenty of women in those positions. I don’t think anything really needs to be done about it, legislation will only give women an unfair advantage. The best PEOPLE for the job should be given the job, no matter the gender.

      As for more men in jails, maybe you should stop raping women and beating each other up? Yeah that was a generalisation, but seriously.. men have no case to argue here.

    • Eric says:

      12:08pm | 26/11/09

      When men make up the majority of people at the low end of the social scale - prisoners - feminists blame it on men’s inferiority.

      So, when men make up the majority of people at the top end of the scale - managers and leaders - shouldn’t the same standards apply?

      And if quotas are appropriate for the top end of society, shouldn’t they be appropriate for the bottom end as well?

      Feminism: It’s all about the double standards.

    • iron lady says:

      12:35pm | 26/11/09

      cats - you are a fool if you think ‘doing nothing’ will change things. 
      No one is suggesting that unqualified people should be in these positions, but that it should be based on merit.
      The problem is, that currently, to rise in business, it is more than just your work ability that plays a role - the old adage ‘its not what you know, its who you know’ is most definitely at play - talking footy, playing golf, being a member of a ‘club’ that won’t accept women and so on are the social means to finding out where the jobs are, board openings, angling for those promotions, and being buddies with those who can promote you - obviously these kinds of activities are not really what women do or they are simply not allowed in - i have worked in offices for the better part of 25 years, and i have seen it time and time again - the locker room/private club mentality rules, and each time it happens, the vicious cycle starts again, as the belief that this is the right way is reinforced to each new generation. 
      Quotas are a means to break this cycle, because the only realistic way to banish the locker room/private club is to force it out - in the future (well, one might hope) that the means to getting to these positions will not rely on your sporting knowledge/ability or membership of some club, but on your business knowledge/ability, and connections made in places where both genders are allowed, as women will be in the positions that promote others, and everyone will have to find another way to get there - a way that isn’t discriminatory against one gender.  In other words, on merit.

      There is no such place as a country that is so immensely wealthy, productive and harmonious that it can afford to ignore half its intelligence because it happens to be housed in female bodies.  It is wasteful and stupid.  The number of times I have seen women who are equally worthy of promotions not get them because they aren’t in the ‘boys club’ is astounding, and simply a reminder that there nothing meritorious about the business world as it stands.

    • Budz says:

      12:48pm | 26/11/09

      Eric, I actually couldn’t agree with you more there. That’s exactly what I was going to say, but you beat me to it! 

      I don’t agree with everything you say, but some of it I do.

    • Anthony says:

      01:37pm | 26/11/09

      I think this is a very worthy read for both sides of the argument (the title and introduction are facetious, don’t just close it after seeing that).

      http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~baumeistertice/goodaboutmen.htm

      It’s a Florida State University psychology professor talking about the differences between men and women and explaining just why the statistics run the way that they do (i.e. females doing better at education, men being more likely to both be in jail and on a management board). I’m not suggesting it’s gospel and it’s somewhat lengthy, but definitely worth a good read.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      01:47pm | 26/11/09

      @ Eric: ” I don’t see any need to reinvent the wheel - rather, my purpose is to spread the truth.”

      I didn’t know you were God.

    • Sloth says:

      02:08pm | 26/11/09

      Hear, hear Iron Lady - you’ve hit the nail on the head. The biggest mistake opponents of board quotas make is the assumption that the current system is a meritocracy. It is simply, and demonstrably not, for all the reasons you’ve outlined. Women aren’t rejected for board positions because they’re unqualified, they’re not even considered in the first place. Having worked at a large Public Company - some 1500 employees in Australia, with no female board members, no female executive management, and only one female manager, unsurprisingly in HR - I’ve seen the same things Iron Lady has. Women simply aren’t considered for roles, and are actively excluded from participating in many of the activities that men in business take for granted. Perth’s Weld club is perhaps the quintessential example.

      Scandanavian countries have board quotas and, surprisingly, the sky has not fallen. The Australian Labor Party has quotas and even Janet Albrectson - right-wing firebrand extraordinaire - has to admit that Labor simply has more talented women MPs than the Liberals. Is this because left-leaning women in poltics are smarter than their conservative counterparts? No. It’s because the quota system forces out the discrimination that has kept talented women from positions that they should have held, but for entrenched and systematic discrimination.

      Quota systems aren’t about overturning the meritocracy that currently exists in Australian business. They are about recognising that there is no meritocracy; that women of merit are excluded or simply not considered for these positions simply by virtue of the fact that they lack a penis.

      The Iron Lady is right; ignoring half of this country’s talent and ability simply because it comes in a female body is utterly absurd. I applaud the Punch for challenging us to talk openly about the viability of radical changes to the current system.

    • kel says:

      02:16pm | 26/11/09

      Eric your prisoner argument cracks me up everytime you use it!!!! Keep your wonderful comedy act going please, it’s very entertaining. Not the slightest bit relevant, or logical, but hilarious nevertheless!

      Back to the actual article, and those discussing what’s actually in it, I agree this issue has been discussed to death lately. I like to think we are finally in a time period where the best person is hired for the job in most major companies… regardless of gender. If this doesn’t happen, then the individual company who is responsible should be singled out, rather than applying blanket suggestions/rules to all.

    • Tim says:

      03:24pm | 26/11/09

      Sloth and Iron Lady,
      what you assume in your argument is that work culture is not part of the job. I would say that work culture is a massive part of business especially at board levels. Being able to relate to colleagues and effectively communicate is part of the job.
      You are also saying that the only place you should be able to do business is in the office which is just stupid. Of course business is going to happen out of the office in social settings. What is stopping women getting involved in this? Nothing.

    • Katz says:

      03:38pm | 26/11/09

      Meow

    • Sloth says:

      03:58pm | 26/11/09

      Tim: well the fact that women are excluded from membership at male-only clubs frequented by businessmen, lawyers, accountants, etc. - like the weld club - is in fact something that’s stopping women getting involved in this.

      Moreover, the fact that - descriptively - business is a boys club says nothing about whether that is how it should be. Work culture is a huge part of the job, no arguments there, but why would we say ‘work culture is essentially male, therefore women should expect to be excluded’, rather than saying, ‘work culture is essentially male and that poses big problems in terms of discrimination and, fundamentally, missing out on talent; we should change it.’

      Or, to put it another way, as a shareholder do I care more about having the best company directors, or having company directors who can all go and hang out at the club together? Obviously the former makes more economic sense. And we might reasonably expect that the more people work together in boards the more we will see work cultures adapting to be more inclusive.

      Work culture is a huge part of a job, and that’s precisely why we need to work on changing work culture so that we don’t end up halving our talent pool and denying women the equality to which they’re entitled for arbitrary, and frankly, silly reasons.

    • Eric says:

      04:53pm | 26/11/09

      Sloth: The fact is that men are excluded from many exclusive women’s clubs. Moreover, women have access to special scholarships, funding, and resources that are denied to men.

      Even with all those advantages, you still complain.

    • Dan says:

      07:09pm | 26/11/09

      The majority of male prisoners are in prison for drugs and drug-related offenses. Only a minority are in for murder. Please do your research, otheriwse you will come off as the female version of Eric.

    • davido says:

      07:28pm | 26/11/09

      I seem to remember M jackson pretty much ran Qantas into the ground. She was a woman.

    • Eric says:

      07:17am | 06/02/10

      Actually, it turns out that gender quotas are bad business.

      “In 2002, the Norwegian parliament passed a law requiring that women must comprise 40 percent of all companies’ corporate boards. Since then, women have gone from holding about 7 percent of corporate-board seats to just more than the legally required 40 percent today.

      “...  there’s little evidence of an economic boom, and some to suggest that the affirmative-action program is hurting companies’ bottom line.

      “... In fact, early evidence from a little-noticed study by the University of Michigan suggests that the immediate effect has been negative on both counts.”

      From http://tinyurl.com/ydnb7zx

    • ovarronee says:

      08:01am | 24/06/11

      Gout Treatment And Medicine http://www.thecouponclass.com/ - generic soma online Patients who are cleared to take Soma should not stop taking it without the advice of a doctor as withdrawal symptoms may appear. soma online

    • pietuique says:

      01:56am | 20/09/11

      Speed Drug Excstacy http://antiquecarsblog.com/ - buy nexium As a proton pump inhibitor, Nexium will help to eliminate the pain, as well as the recurrence of heartburn. nexium cost

    • Gerryoad says:

      08:25am | 28/06/12

      If you are looking for a ideal reward for women, you’ll find nothing as excellent while custom duplicate designer totes. The quality and design and style is practically virtually the original types, and you’ll buy them about truly reasonable prices. The one reason designer totes are very pricey can be a exclusivity included. You’d probably not likely have the true label while using massive and recognized designers throughout designer totes, on the other hand, it is possible to nevertheless pick up precisely the same amount of focus.

    • amelianaeta says:

      12:38pm | 19/09/12

      ERYERZSDGASDSDAFHSAD QWERZSDGASDSDAFHSAD
      QWERASDGASDSDAFHSAD ADFHGSDGSADSDGASD
      ADFHGADFHGDAFADFHAD ADFHGASDGASDXZCBZX
      SDGSDSDGSADXZCBZX SDGSDSDGSADASDFHGAD

    • Kipageelipt says:

      03:05pm | 20/09/12

      As an example Kris becomes a texas holdem action of which significant images of them via internet. Piece of fruit grants after which once in the phone store he switches genuinely of them to XXX intercomparable credit cards which defy TOS.  Justin Bieber Shoes,Jordan Pas Cher

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter