It’s the day Cats fans have been dreading all year: their favorite son, Gary Ablett, will sign a deal to become a Sun. A Gold Goast Sun.

Ablett after losing to Collingwood in this year's finals. Picture: Michael Dodge

If you were offered $9.5 million over five years, would you take it? Would you leave the club that has made you what you are today?

If you were offered a once-in-a-lifetime deal that would shape a life of luxury, security and comfort for your family, would you take it?

Most likely. Ablett needs the Suns as much as the Gold Coast team needs Ablett.

It’s a sad day for the Cats, with coach Mark ‘Bomber’ Thompson likely to leave too.

The very core of the Cats has been ripped out.

In pictures: Top 100 Ablett moments

Ablett is now the highest-paid AFL player in history. He is set to take the Suns to a competitive level in the AFL, but it makes you wonder how the Suns will cope if, as reported, Ablett’s deal takes up about a quarter of the salary cap.

It beats me but those deals always leave a question mark. The reality is that the Suns will struggle to make the top eight for at least two years. Ablett isn’t going to like losing - he is so used to winning and dominating play.

Ablett knows the Cats’ golden era is on the slide. Maybe it was the right time to leave, knowing there’s going to be a change in leadership.

But the overriding issue is club loyalty. In today’s world of AFL superstars, and multi-million dollar deals, there’s no room for it.

Who can convince me there is any loyalty in the business of sport?

Club loyalty is a thing of the past, when you had a club like Hawthorn in the 1980s, who mostly stuck together and you had players like Leigh Matthews and Peter Knights who stayed at the one club throughout their career.

The pursuit of affluence has wiped out core values that gave a playing group the formula to win. Where’s the integrity, commitment and loyalty?

The world of professional sport is so hungry that it overlooks the qualities that build success over time.

The AFL is only going to become more powerful with big bucks invested to catch big-name players, with the hope of buying the winning edge.

103 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Ablett's human says:

      11:55am | 29/09/10

      Ablett is human. Money and security is more important than mates and relationships.

    • Dilbert says:

      02:26pm | 29/09/10

      You can have all the money and security in the world and still not be happy without mates and relationships.

    • KH says:

      03:38pm | 29/09/10

      He can still keep his friends and relationships.  Long ago, most codes of football were amateur, and match payments were nominal at best - loyalty may have been a consideration then, but now sport is business.  Big business - look how much money the AFL is raking in from the replay this week.  These guys have a fixed time for their careers - maybe into their early 30s, if they are lucky and don’t get injured.  After that, its very hit and miss.  For most of them, they don’t have any other skills - certainly not ones that will earn them millions.  Not everyone can be a coach, or a media commentator.  Of course they should make as much as they can out of it whilst they can.  If Ablett is smart, he will be getting good financial advice and making sure his earnings now will hold him in good stead for a much more uncertain future once his playing days are over.  He will be retired from football a lot longer than he played for.

    • Lorraine says:

      04:27pm | 30/09/10

      He has just changed employers. Many of us do that. And as for the club making something of him…. he brought a lot of inate talent into the club and they received maximum benefit.
      He owes the club nothing.

    • Pete M says:

      12:09pm | 29/09/10

      Of course you’d take the money given his situation.
      Sport IS business. Has been for years.
      Good luck to the guy.

    • Phil says:

      12:32pm | 29/09/10

      You would thinks that happiness is more important than money Pete M

    • Pete M says:

      01:48pm | 29/09/10

      I seriously doubt he’ll be that unhappy, Phil.
      Gold Coast sunshine versus depressing Melbourne winters.

    • Lance says:

      03:35pm | 30/09/10

      Loyalty is a forgotten value. Money is the thing. It’s always going to be central to any decision.

    • Up there Kazelly its warm says:

      04:01pm | 30/09/10

      Pete M - you left out depressing Melbourne summers

    • Sunshine says:

      12:18pm | 29/09/10

      Ablett is going for the sunshine. Geelong is such a dreary place!

    • Ridiculous says:

      12:30pm | 29/09/10

      That’s ridiculous Sunshine. He’s going for the money, of course!

    • AJ says:

      02:01pm | 29/09/10

      So True! A terrible place. Full of bogans…

    • Chuck says:

      09:51am | 30/09/10

      AJ, are you talking about Geelong or the Gold Coast?

    • Gary T says:

      12:20pm | 29/09/10

      The AFL has created this situation. Other Suns players will struggle to get decent dough.

    • Robbo says:

      02:01pm | 29/09/10

      Nathan Bock - $600,000 per year
      Michael Rischitelli - $500,000
      Karmichael Hunt - $1,000,000
      Campbell Brown - $500,000
      Sounds like fairly decent dough to me!

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      05:12am | 30/09/10

      The AFL did indeed create the situation - they decided to prop up Victorian clubs by instituting the draft system and in doing so, have removed loyalty from the equation across the board.

    • Rob says:

      03:37pm | 30/09/10

      So how will Karmichael Hunt cope if all the attention is on Ablett? Will be interesting to see how he adapts.

    • Fimnick says:

      12:25pm | 29/09/10

      As I heard Sam Newman say at a luncheon one day. The only loyalty that you need to show is to the club that’s writing your pay cheque. Loyalty cuts both ways you know. Clubs will trade ANYBODY if the deal suits them. Traditional loyalty has gone out the window. Good luck to Ablett. As far as I’m concerned, he’s made the right decision.

    • Carly G says:

      01:13pm | 29/09/10

      Well said Fimnick. Clubs go on about loyalty when they lose a player to another club, they wanted to keep, but forget all that when they want to show a player the door. Its no different to an office worker changing jobs for more money.

    • Hopie says:

      01:21pm | 29/09/10

      100% agree, the clubs started this trend NOT the players. Coaches are now totally ruthless so why can’t players look after themselves?

    • macca says:

      02:05pm | 29/09/10

      Totally agree with you (and Sam). Watch club loyalty when Geelong force Milburn into retirement in teh next few weeks.  Loyalty is pumped up to be the pivotal pitch in a club negotiation. How many people (gen x or Y) stay in teh one company for 10 years. Professional sport mimicks real life in all ways, social pressures, drugs, loyalty. Too many traditionalists cant get their head around this

    • Shane T says:

      02:49pm | 29/09/10

      Absolutely 100% spot on Fimnick.  No-one can begrudge Ablett the money, and there was only had one decision he could make, and that was to move.

    • Angry God says:

      08:03pm | 29/09/10

      Spot on, no club in any code are Pope’s when it comes to tradie bait. The use of the line shows that your arguement is purely emotional and not rational, and ignores the practices of clubs when they are targetting a certain player. Combined the Abletts have done more for Geelong than Geelong has done for them.

    • Britt says:

      03:34pm | 30/09/10

      Let’s hope Ablett doesn’t do a knee or something. Would be a tragedy if he did.

    • Mervyn Morris says:

      12:28pm | 29/09/10

      Ablett would be a total fool to reject all this money, so don’t blame him.  It’s the AFL who have destroyed any remaining notion of club loyalty.  Had Geelong come close to matching the offer, there would have been major resentment among the rest of the players who would have received large pay cuts.  This would have meant open season for other clubs to poach top Geelong players.  No doubt the AFL will consider Geelong well compensated with a mid range draft pick.  And it’s not all over yet, once Gold Coast have what they want, we start again with West Sydney.  It’s irrelevent that no one can work out why we need West Sydney in the competition.

    • Old Salt says:

      12:30pm | 29/09/10

      Club loyalty ended years ago, this is nothing new.  Ask yourself this question - would you be loyal to your employee if you were offered better money for the same job somewhere else? You have to look after yourself first because no-one else will.

    • BMJ says:

      12:33pm | 29/09/10

      Who is Gary Ablett?

    • Dave says:

      12:34pm | 29/09/10

      The problem he will face will be the intense pressure to perform. If he thought life in Geelong was a fishbowl then I reckon it will be 10 times worse with the Suns. He will single handedly be expected to deliver a premiership during the life of this contract. Gary Ablett Snr copped a lot of scrutiny during his career and now his son will get even more. I hope the money is worth the pressure and expectation that goes along with deal

    • yeh but says:

      04:40pm | 29/09/10

      Yeh but Gary Ablett Snr copped a lot of scutiny for all of the wrong reasons,,,  his off field discretions.

    • MarK says:

      12:38pm | 29/09/10

      The 1980’s send a hello from club loyalty land.

      Get over it. You are so far behind the times on this it is a joke. The sport is professional. Loyalty ranks about 275th on a priority list for any player or official in the harsh light of day.

      The only time loyalty is important to a club is when they hope a retain a player and pay less than market value.

      The only time loyalty is important for a player is when they wish to be paid more than they are worth or need to prolong their career.

      The rest is sugar coated crap.

    • Scarneck says:

      01:19pm | 29/09/10

      I agree MarK. In a similar situation, I wonder what Rob Oakeshott would have done? wink
      Take the money or be loyal to his club (electorate)?

    • John says:

      12:40pm | 29/09/10

      Club loyality died about the same time the clubs started sacking and trading players and coaches without a thought of the individuals involved. Dont make it out as the club has been the innocent hurt party here. Good luck Gaz.

    • stephen says:

      12:43pm | 29/09/10

      Yeah well he’s gonna get a bit a’ sun too so he’d better put a mop on his head cause elsewise with that new jersey 2 hours under the rays he’s gonna look like a jaffa. (and he’s just gonna get rolled down the isle, circa 1964.)

    • Ben says:

      12:44pm | 29/09/10

      Does Gary Ablett really lack integrity, loyalty or commitment? He has been committed to the Cats this year and played like it. They don’t own him, why shouldnt he go with the big money.
      You could say he should have declared what he was doing before now, but look at how the Crows treated Bock when he said he was joining the GC team. There would have been the same calls for Ablett to be dropped from Geelong (not that they would have done it!) as a disruptive influence.
      In the end fans cheer jumpers not players.

    • Ian G says:

      12:48pm | 29/09/10

      Club loyalty is a two way street. Don’t weep the lack of player loyalty to club when the reverse has been buried by most clubs a generation ago.

    • Vic. Rhodes says:

      12:49pm | 29/09/10

      Show me the money ...the catchcry of the modern world ...well money doesn,t talk, it swears obscenity.

    • Paul says:

      12:51pm | 29/09/10

      Why should players be loyal to clubs when clubs are rarely loyal to players? And why the sudden outrage at the supposed lack of loyatly shown by players? There hasnt been any loyalty in AFL since it became the AFL. There is only perceived loyalty which is shown either by players too old to shift to another club, or a player who doesnt want to change clubs as it will be major disruption to his personal and/or family life

    • Carl Palmer says:

      12:52pm | 29/09/10

      Hmm, loyalty is a two way street, clubs are also very quick to trade and delist players as they please.

      The unfortunate reality is that these clubs run a business and the business is winning football games. You win your membership rises, you lose it falls. You try and keep the good players and dump the ones that don’t “fit in your game plan”.

      As for the Sun, they will need name players to increase membership and the occasional RL player to assist with growing the game.  When entering a new market area, you need to spend a few dollars and the AFL knows that. It did it for Sydney and it will do it for the Sun and the GWS team.  The AFL made a few mistakes with the Sydney move, it won’t do that for any other startup club.

      As for the winning feeling – I think been part of a brand new start up team has its upside and there is a ring of excitement in the new venture and as for Gary Jnr, win or lose he will be set up for life and I say good on him and good luck to the Sun.

    • Brisbane says:

      12:53pm | 29/09/10

      Suns for 2011 Premiership for sure, and all these players who have signed with the GC have signed their financial security for many years after football too. Good on them all.

    • Markus says:

      12:54pm | 29/09/10

      Much like in large sections of the private sector, loyalty in sport is dead.
      And is not just because of the players, the clubs are just as much to blame.

      For every big media story of a superstar like Ablett changing clubs for a substantial pay rise, there are 10 unreported stories of players taking paycuts or even being cut entirely from a club they have played their whole career for for the sporting equivalent of minimum wage, just so the club has another $20,000 to fit the previously mentioned superstar within their cap.

    • TheBigMicka says:

      12:55pm | 29/09/10

      Yeah right.  Players change clubs all the time and have done since the beginnings of the VFL.  Coaches changes clubs and have done since the beginnings of the VFL.  They do it to win premierships, earn more money, get the opportunity to play a preferred position, because they don’t like someone, because they want a new challenge.  From the point of view of players, coaches, committees, there has never been loyalty in sport.

      The Geelong group stayed together and accepted less money than they might’ve gotten elsewhere because they wanted ultimate success and were in a position to achieve that.  Nothing to do with loyalty.  Everything to do with holding the Premiership Cup at the end of the year.

      The only loyalty in sport comes from us mug supporters.

    • Luke says:

      12:58pm | 29/09/10

      Good luck to him, his experience will be invaluable to the new recruits as they will learn how champions prepare themselves for games.

      Living in Western Sydney I just hope we attrack a player with as much class and ability next year when it is our turn to build a team.

    • Notorious says:

      01:02pm | 29/09/10

      I can’t convince you that there is loyalty in the business of sport, but why should there be just reference to Club Loyalty from players, what about Clubs being loyal to their players. (Take Melbourne dumping Brock Mclean). The other thing is that club loyalty isn’t dead (if it was ever alive). There are pleanty of loyal players in this age take, Robert Harvey, David Neitz, Boomer Harvey and Brad Johnson. Club ‘Disloyalty’ leaving a club who has made you who you are is not a new thing either, of modern and past times examples include Chris Judd, Tony Lockett and Peter Moore. With sounding like a complete twat, I think you’ve missed the mark a little bit. They’re a lots of examples to prove and disprove you’re point, and taking this club loyalty high horse is just a bit farcical.

    • Alfred Deakin says:

      01:03pm | 29/09/10

      Loyalty is a two way street.

      In a few weeks Geelong will delist some players hae served Geelong loyally, and who want to keep on playing. Will everyone carry on about loyalty then, or will they just say “Geelong was acting for the greater good of the club, and that comes before the good of individuals”?

    • Laurie says:

      01:03pm | 29/09/10

      Loyalty died long ago. The highest bidder gets the prize.

    • 77Kingswood says:

      01:06pm | 29/09/10

      I’m not a freo supporter but Matthew Pavlich could have talked with the any of the Adelaide sides (his home town) or the Gold Coast (they could use a big power forward) and received more then what he is getting at freo but he chose to become a one club player. There are plenty of guys who want to stay a one club player but like alot of the posts have said clubs will just as quickly offer a player up for trade as a player will look for the money/premiership.

    • Dilbert says:

      02:31pm | 29/09/10

      ^^ This. Pav, Archer, Hodge, Riewoldt, Kouta, Craig Bradley, Mcleod… The list of players that stay loyal to one club is long, and they are known as legends and club champions… Changing clubs for money only tarnishes your name.

    • Realist says:

      03:44pm | 29/09/10

      If Pavlich was offered the sort of money that has been offered to Ablett, he would have forgotten all about club loyalty as well. If you think any differently, then your a fool.

    • 77Kingswood says:

      04:40pm | 29/09/10

      @ Realist sure $9.5m for 5 years noboby with half a brain would pass that up but how often do you think offers like that come around. What i am saying is that someone like Pav could have easily have gotten more money at another club (maybe not 200% more) but has chosen to stay loyal to Freo instead of take an extra ?0,000-?00,000.

    • Peter Wray says:

      01:15pm | 29/09/10

      How long does a footballer have at his peak, taking the offer augers well after his time at the top of his game ends.  Good luck to him.

    • S.L says:

      01:16pm | 29/09/10

      Gary Ablett is making the right decision for a few reasons. Firstly of course the cash is too good to refuse. Secondly the climate and lifestyle of the Gold Coast and thirdly the one common ground with all AFL players that move north of the Murray, anonymity so they can be themselves without getting hassled every time they walk out their front door.

    • Peter says:

      01:18pm | 29/09/10

      Even the Son of “God” has finally deserted Victoria!  For years our best have flocked to the Big V for the big bucks.  So long sunshine! I hope he earns his money!

    • Peter of Point Cook says:

      01:28pm | 29/09/10

      Your comment:  At the end of the day,  loyalty doesn’t always pay the bills.  And as for the comment “the end of club loyalty” .. what about the great Ron Barassi ... he was the first to move clubs if I can remember back.

    • Randal says:

      01:29pm | 29/09/10

      Julie, surely club loyalty must go both ways, and the reality is that football clubs desperate to improve year to year make decisions to trade and delist players who they believe (whether for reasons of skill, form or age) can no longer contribute to the direction they want to take the club.

      It is therefore a bit rich to expect loyalties from players when they know that the club will show none to them once it has been determined that moving them on may be in the better interest of the club.

      Just ask James McDonald at Melbourne or Scott West at the Bulldogs what club loyalty got him once their clubs decided that they where better off replaced by youth.

    • J-dog says:

      01:29pm | 29/09/10

      “The very core of the cats has been ripped out”. Yet another example of the hysterical media that we have witnessed in relation to Geelong over the past 36 hours. Other examples include “the crumbling of the Cat empire” (The Age) and the club being “rocked to its foundations” (Herald Sun). A message to those who are desperate to dance on Geelong’s grave: Geelong’s foundations are strong. The club has excellent financials and a culture of recent success. A new and very impressive President-to-be has been waiting in the wings for some time, ready to take over from Frank Costa. Plans are in place for further redevelopment of Skilled Stadium, plus potential development of a training facility on Geelong’s outskirts.

    • russ says:

      01:29pm | 29/09/10

      name one person who wouldn’t take such a pay rise (200%!) from a competitor organisation. he is doing what anyone would do - looking after his future and his family. its common sense, good on him.

    • Geoffa says:

      01:30pm | 29/09/10

      Does anyone remember the Cats shafted Steven King after the 2007 GF and shunted him to St Kilda. Loyalty in AFL died long ago. If it is loyalty you’re after support a local club, where guys do play for the jumper. And the clubs dont shaft the players.

    • Bob says:

      01:32pm | 29/09/10

      so what if he left? I would too given what was on the table… no club is going to be loyal to him when his time is up so why shouldn’t look after his own backside- noone else will! Not really comparable to Leigh matthews era, etc as it wasn’t a full professional sport then, in terms of payment anyway/

    • Gregg says:

      01:32pm | 29/09/10

      Sure there will always be player trades/buys and especially with the formation of new clubs or even older clubs out for some success.
      North Melbourne kind of bought a few premierships starting with the likes of Doug Wade, Barry Davis and Rantall.

      Ablett now sets the record for $$$$ paid and there are a few others who have had lucrative deals too, many for staying with existing clubs.
      But is it a huge pattern?
      Or how about someone run through team lists and see especially with the older original VFL teams just how much nig money is luring players away compared to how many players have played out their career with the one side.

    • ThatFishGuy says:

      01:35pm | 29/09/10

      How is this any different to a journalist accepting a position at another newspaper? Or a lawyer being headhunted by another firm? It’s easy to say that he should be loyal and stay at Geelong, but unless you’ve been employed by the same organization in the same job for your entire life you are in no position to judge. People change jobs all the time. Some for personal reasons, some for career growth, but most for salary and pay increases. That’s all he’s done – change employer.

    • Ned says:

      01:50pm | 29/09/10

      Spot on. Professional sporting clubs have long since ceased being clubs and are corporations. That’s the way things are today and all the major codes are better for it. Ablett is no more than an employee of the corporation (in this case, Geelong Football Club) and is entitled to make his services available to anyone he likes. And, he’s fully entitled to demand as much money as he can get.

    • Trav says:

      03:27pm | 29/09/10

      Damn right aye, its all i have done in my working life, chasing the dollar for a better lifestyle.

    • Rodger Kensen says:

      01:38pm | 29/09/10

      This article is complete tripe - “Club loyalty is a thing of the past” I hear.  How about family loyalty?  Like to his brother Nathan whom he hopes to have an opportunity to once again play with.  Blood is thicker than water.  Should Club loyalty be stronger than family loyalty? 

      In total there are I think 6 players that left their clubs, Bock (not so popular after a domestic violence incident), Krakoeur (injured & not been at Port too long) and Brown (left on good terms) are hardly disloyal.  In fact they are taking more money to set up their families - to whom their true loyalty lies.

      Then what about the more than 95% of players that signed contracts to ensure they stay at their clubs?  Pavlich at Freo was expected to return to his original home SA but is now a Docker for life.  Sam Jacobs from the Blues wants to return to his family is SA, he just has different loyalties.

      If this article was meant to be evidence of a decline in club loyalty, it’s a complete failure.

    • Tinman says:

      01:38pm | 29/09/10

      The end of club loyalty?!!! ... I am gobsmacked by this suggestion Julie. What about Barrasi going from Melbourne to Carlton to North ... Phil Carman and Crackers Keenan changing clubs every year ... Apparently Chris Judd played somehwere else once too, I could name plenty of other spuds ... And what do you think Daniel Bradshaw thinks about club loyalty after gettng the flick from Brisbane?

    • Gra says:

      08:02pm | 29/09/10

      @ Tinman

      Sorry Tinman, but I was under the impression that in this case it was the other way around. After Brisbane shopped Bradshaw, along with Rischitelli as the extra trade bait, for the possibility of a trade to Carlton for Fevola, Bradshaw wasn’t too impressed with that show of loyalty from his employer, and duly told them where they could place thier loyalty, and he joined the Swans as his way of saying thanks. More a case of him telling them rather than them giving him the flick wouldn’t you say? Your spot on about the loyalty though, it’s purely business these days.

    • Pabdog says:

      01:42pm | 29/09/10

      Loyalty in AFL has long been a one way street. Clubs and supporters will scream for loyalty when it suits them but if a loyal player can be used in a trade to benefit the club, then they have no hesitation in moving them on. The AFL is a cut throat business these days and I dont think anyone can blame Ablett for ensuring his, and his family’s, financial future.

    • igor says:

      01:43pm | 29/09/10

      Yes, he’s a great player. Yes, he’ll be sorely missed. But I’d be more worried about losing your coach if I was Cats fan. Your time in the premiership sun may be about to expire. Back to the wilderness where you came from. But don’t worry, the Suns will be there with you.

    • Richo says:

      01:46pm | 29/09/10

      Good on him, take the money as you are quickly thrown to the dust bin if you don’t perform. Take a look at all the other players that don’t make it at the highest level, who cares about them? It annoys me when everyone goes on about loyalty to the club. Club? This is big business not a club. Gary is smart enough to know the difference and is getting his pounds worth.

    • Peter says:

      01:47pm | 29/09/10

      Loyaly is a two way street. Do clubs go out of their way to keep a declining player who is past his peak? No. They’ll trade him or sack him if they believe it’s in their best interest. And hardly anyone complains. So why should players treat clubs any differently.

      As for the cap, half their list is rookie players on cheap money, so they can afford to over pay for stars. As a Swans fan I’m trying not to dance on Geelong’s grave so karma rewards me with GWS not taking any of our key players next year.

    • Gezza says:

      01:49pm | 29/09/10

      Not sure that Geelong has necessarily made him the player he is today…he is simply an out and out champion playing in a very good side. Good luck to him. Hopefully the GC Suns won’t be the embarrassment everyone thinks they’ll be and become ligitimate contenders very soon.

    • AM says:

      02:02pm | 29/09/10

      The difference between Ablett and Pavlich is that Ablett has premierships, a brownlow and all that other kind of team success. I think Pav would have chased the money if he had that level of success that Ablett has had at Geelong. As a cats supporter myself, I am a little sad to see him go, but I’d make the same decision in the same circumstances. Good luck Gaz.

    • Elphaba says:

      02:05pm | 29/09/10

      Fans going up in arms and screaming about how players have ‘betrayed’ the club by leaving it for a better offer need to get a grip.  If you were offered a better deal somewhere else, are you telling me you wouldn’t take it?

      I’ve worked for rival companies - why is sport any different?  They have to make as much money as they can in a short period of time, because they’re likely to retire by about 35.  As others have said above, sport is a business, you’re likely to get hurt quite badly, so you have to look out for number 1.  Clubs are happy to trade players, so why can’t he chase the money?  Good luck to Ablett, although I think the $9.5 million reports are a little spurious…

    • Barney says:

      02:22pm | 29/09/10

      The notion of Club loyalty is rubbish - surely no one is suggesting that Club’s are loyal to players - go for it Gary

    • mark novak says:

      02:23pm | 29/09/10

      probably the worst football article i’ve read all year. “The pursuit of affluence has wiped out core values that gave a playing group the formula to win. Where’s the integrity, commitment and loyalty?”—-> CLICHE GARBAGE. it’s obvious u only like to print what u think ppl may want to read. who are u to question integrity in sport? please provide a list of your experience and credentials… if u know anything about AFL and have been close to it, as i have, u would know that clubs dont give a stuff about players and players should never, ever give a stuff about clubs. period. go take ur fantasis elsewhere. a club will drop u so quickly, and they dont care if ur career is ruined by it. there never has been loyalty u idiot

    • Haydn says:

      02:23pm | 29/09/10

      Barrassi killed club loyalty years ago. Then again, what about clubs putting players on the chopping block when it suits them. At the end of the day it is only a game. Players have a limited time in which to earn money and the end can come at any time. I support the jumper [red and blue] and not necessarily the player wearing it.

    • Justin says:

      02:25pm | 29/09/10

      I don’t know why this “journalist” is bothering to comment on football when it seems she knows little about it with her ill educated and ill researched comments.

      She doesn’t know Gary Ablett so how will she know he won’t like to be part of a rebuilding team and not play finals for 1 or 2 years?

      For all you know he could be relishing the the chance to be forge a new history and help shape a young team and take them into September action, maybe even go all the way. (No I’m not a Suns supporter nor will be)

      And if you were offered $1M+ to write rubbish opinions for another site, I’m pretty sure your “loyalty” to this site would vanish in a heart beat.

      You know what they say about opinions. It’s just sad that they let so many people money out of publishing them and take any opportunity to jump on a big news item that they know little about in order to score a few extra hits. Well done, you got mine. It will be the last time I read any opinion written by you though.

    • leigh says:

      02:35pm | 29/09/10

      Don’t for one second think this (dis)loyalty is just a player to club relationship, how about the club’s loyalty to players each and every year during Trade week?  Players such as Jude Bolton for the Sydney Swans being offered up as trade bait is a perfect example of club’s being just as disloyal as the players. The entire landscape of modern football has changed, and it has been this way since the late 90’s. Why should players show loyalty when one mediocre year, they would be on the trade table anyway.

    • Chris from Cranbourne says:

      02:43pm | 29/09/10

      Club Loyalty is Dead????  .  .  .  YES, has been dead for years .  .  .  Clubs would be the first to deal a player if it was in their interest .  .  .  There would be more players dumped by their clubs than clubs dumped by players .  .  .  Sport is a profession and if the player does not take their opportunities, then they would not maximise their talent’s worth!!! I have no sympathy for any club

    • Matt says:

      02:45pm | 29/09/10

      Has the club ‘made him’ or has his talent helped the club?

    • Tash says:

      02:53pm | 29/09/10

      Julie asks…“Would you leave the club that has made you who you are today?” The real question here is “did Geelong make Ablett” or did “Ablett make Geelong” what they are today??? I say good on you Gary! You’ve always behaved with the utmost dignity as well as being a fantastic footballer! A real ambassador of the game.

    • Ben G says:

      03:08pm | 29/09/10

      People are loyal to their clubs and vice versa but that doesn’t mean there are practical realities that get in the way. There are limitations to what loyalty can get you.
      Ross Glendinning played great footy for North Melbourne, but came home to Perth when the opportunity arose.
      No one thinks of Mick Malthouse as disloyal but he’s worked with five separate clubs in his career.
      Loyalty cannot and never has trumped things like money, generational change, new opportunities & challenges and so forth.
      Loyalty is the reason you can’t lure Matthew Pavlich away from Freo with 5% over what he’s getting. It probably wouldn’t help much if someone offered to double his pay-checque. That’s not a recent thing, it’s a story as old as time.

    • Justin says:

      03:09pm | 29/09/10

      All spot on comments regarding it being a two way street. The only loyalty that exists in football is supporters and volunteers. Geelong will certainly not fall as quick as West Coast did after losing Judd and Cousins, but I think Geelong are not top 4 certainties for next year with their gamechanger gone.

    • Budz says:

      03:09pm | 29/09/10

      Loyalty? Pfft! Clubs and players make business decisions these days.

    • Damian says:

      03:13pm | 29/09/10

      When was the last time a club showed loyalty to a player? Once a player reaches “a certain age”, gets a long term injury or him form drops, the club will drop him like a bad habit. Then they have the cheek to whine about players being disloyal?

    • Murray Dickson says:

      03:26pm | 29/09/10

      As a Suns member and still die-hard Fitzroy supporter (not the lousy Brisbane Bear variety) it is fantastic that we can get players like Ablett. And for the rest of the AFL it is actually a good thing too - the sporting landscape has changed dramatically over the last 10 years and now the AFL needs to cover ALL the major population centres especially when wanting to maximise media income.  But we can’t be like the Rugby League who opened and closed teams in Perth, Adelaide, Wollongong, Hunter, North Sydney, Newtown, Gold Coast (twice), Brisbane Crushers (really they are a pathetic joke). So please support what the AFL are doing on the Gold Coast and in Western Sydney - it is for our great games future

    • CommonSense says:

      03:34pm | 29/09/10

      Clubs will get rid of players at the blink of an eye…they will not hold onto anyone if they are not in their plans for the future!!...Being a Bombers fan, and seeing how lloyd was pretty much told to retire, i can feel for Geelong, but look what they did with his father?...you think those feelings are not their either? He idolises his dad, and the club deserted him when he needed them the most!!...

    • Budgie says:

      03:35pm | 29/09/10

      I don’t think of it in terms of Club Loyalty.. more in that Ablett Jnr had 2 options before him. Option 1 offered immediate financial gain, a new challenge and “maybe” a better chance at another premiership. Option 2 offered not as much finance, a chance to help rebuild a new era with “maybe” another shot at a premiership.. but also.. the chance to create a legend. This is I think the disappointing thing. The money offered from Geelong was still good (I’d take it), but only at Geelong could he build on the “Ablett” name and create a legend to be talked about for generations.. That chance has now gone and Ablett will be destined to become another “great” of the game.. but Legend.. perhaps not!
      We are all “Mondays Experts” and it shows our passion for the game. Keep the passion but don’t get so emotional you lose touch with reality.

    • CommonSense says:

      04:52pm | 29/09/10

      I agree whole heartedly…sometimes there are other invaluable commodities which dont show their full worth now, but when the opportunity has passed us by, do we realise how we have stuffed up!

    • rod says:

      03:38pm | 29/09/10

      Club loyalty has been dead for years where have you been hiding?
      Alas it goes both ways too a club will dump you like a hot potato if they get a sniff you are of lesser value to them.

    • The Badger says:

      03:40pm | 29/09/10

      “Would you leave the club that has made you what you are today?”

      huh?
      Do you think Ablett would have been any less a player if he had played at another club?

      I suggest you have it the wrong way around. Ablett made the club. Where were they before Ablett showed up?

    • Kate says:

      04:11pm | 29/09/10

      For us, footy is a passion and a source of entertainment. For Ablett, it’s a job. There is no way I would turn down a new job with a pay rise of over 100% just because people at my job liked me and wanted me to stay.

      As others have said, the issue of declining club loyalty is not purely the fault of players wanting more money. Look at how Brisbane tried to throw Rischitelli and Bradshaw under the bus in their desperation to get Fevola. Players and coaches understand that footy is a business as well as a sport and in order to achieve success, loyalty sometimes has to be discarded.

      And for those who get genuinely upset at the thought of players leaving the club that ‘made’ them - cheer up. For every Judd and Ablett there’s a one-club man like Brad Johnson or Boomer Harvey.

    • Mike T says:

      04:16pm | 29/09/10

      Interesting comments and i can see it from both sides. I agree that a player will leave for more money (who wouldnt), so loyalty is in a sense dead. But the various leagues should do everything in thier power to encourgae players to stay with a club….why…becasue the fans (who the game is ultimatley about) want to see players come throught the ranks and stay with the club.

      So lets replace the word loyalty (becasue its dead) with retention….... The various league’s need to build MORE stratergies to make it much easier for a player to stay with the one club. There is many ways to do this, ie,  a players wage does not go to the salary cap if he has been at the club for more then 5 years etc…... the result of these sort of stratergies is that players stay…. not driven by loyalty, but at the end of the day who cares!!!!  its a win win

      Unfrotunately most of the leagues are driven by TV rights and a fasination of spreading the talent, so they dont care if players move every year as long as the teams are equal and they get a higher tv deal. The loser is of course us….we must endure watching journey men turn out one year and leave the next…. it certainly makes it hard to follow yoour club with passion

    • Peter Scott says:

      04:19pm | 29/09/10

      Good on ya Gazza!

      I would of done the same, you would have to be brain dead not to make the move to GC Suns.

      Geelong has had there time for now and Gaz you have had your time as a player with the cats, hence the move..

      Smart move!

      Fresh start…

      Challenge

      Good Stuff!


      Talking loyalty in footy, there is no such thing.

      It’s 2010 not the 1950’s or 60’s

      I remember back in 1975 when North Melbourne recruited all the great players from other VFL clubs under Ron Barrasi to buy there 1st premiership.

      Think back people…

      And

      Harden up!

      Footy’s a Big game and it is also BIG business…

      Good on ya Gaz

      I wish you all the very best at your new home…

      The GC Suns!

    • Andrew says:

      04:42pm | 29/09/10

      To the players and coaches its a business and a livelihood.  To the fans its a passion.  Let’s not confuse the two.

    • Personaly says:

      04:49pm | 29/09/10

      Personaly i think that the AFL would have been deeply involved in the push to get Ablett to join the Gold Coast Sun. Ablett and Hunt will be the clubs big PR drawcards, obviously in a bid to bring in new sponsors, members and supporters.

    • stephen says:

      08:58pm | 29/09/10

      Baloney. Mr. Sheedy is making a big mistake expanding the AFL here, and I hope, though not only for the sake of the NRL, he fails.

    • Dan says:

      10:55am | 30/09/10

      Mr Sheedy? As in Kevin Sheedy? Sheedy is a coach. I think you mean Andrew Demitrieul the ceo of the AFL.

    • Dan says:

      11:41am | 30/09/10

      Andrew Demetriou, that is.

    • Dan says:

      09:23pm | 29/09/10

      “Where’s the integrity, commitment and loyalty?”

      Why is it that whenever people talk about loyalty, it’s always the players who must do so. What about the clubs themselves? How loyal are they when they delist/trade/force to retire long-term players.

      Ablett owes Geelong absolutely nothing at all. He has every right to leave, and those who call him disloyal should have a good long look at the clubs themselves.

    • D says:

      08:19am | 30/09/10

      Completely agree Dan,  I reckon it would have only been another 2 or 3 years before Geelong dangled Ablett out as trade bait.  We all know the situation….couple more long, hard seasons, legs getting a bit more tired, speed isn’t what it used to be = let’s trade in on his name for a couple of draft picks or some good young talent while we (Geelong FC) can still get a good price.

    • john says:

      10:15pm | 29/09/10

      “Club loyalty isn’t dying, it’s dead” - Inside Football magazine, 1974.

    • Steve says:

      01:42am | 30/09/10

      Gees jules - you certainly don’t remember the great Barassi going from Melbourne to Carlton to North Melbourne to Melbourne. Your commentary lacks a historical context. Pity that some of us don’t excuse your ignorance.  Very poor effort fromn such an inelegant writer.

    • Peter says:

      10:49am | 01/10/10

      Since when have clubs been loyal to players? The clubs want it both ways..

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter