Late last Friday, on the eve of the ANZAC Day weekend, the Melbourne Storm scandal raged in the Australian media. It was then that the Rudd Government chose to announce in a statement that it was reversing its policy of allowing non-residents into the Australian housing market in unprecedented numbers.

Sydney real estate, now mostly owned by the Dutch a really rich Malaysian guy

It was the third policy backflip in as many days, all under the cover of the media storm about the Melbourne Rugby League club. First, the government pulled the plug on its home insulation scheme, citing the billion dollars required to clean-up its previous mess.

Then it surreptitiously announced that the promised 230 child care centres would not be built, also by media release.

Days before the third announcement, the government was still claiming that there were no problems with foreigners purchasing Australian houses. This was contrary to the growing anger in suburban Australia, as local buyers found themselves regularly outbid by overseas buyers.

For weeks, my claims that the Rudd policy was forcing Australians out of the market and inflating house prices was met with disdain. Even a warning from the Reserve Bank Governor, Glenn Stevens, was ignored.

But with an election looming, the policy has been reversed, even though the government still thinks there is no problem.

The Rudd government has scored the quadrella for housing unaffordability. First, State governments have limited land releases across the country. Then the Rudd government engineered a massive spike in immigration. Thirdly, its wasteful stimulus package encouraged people to buy houses at low interest rates, only to see them hit as the Reserve Bank pushed the rates up again to counter inflation.

This was compounded by a decision in April 2008 to open up the residential housing market to non-residents.

The result was startling. In many suburbs, the majority of sales have been to overseas purchasers. Locals have been priced out of housing in their own cities. Real Estate Agents across the nation report multiple sales to overseas families who have stockpiled Australian houses for their capital gains.

To add insult to injury, many have remained unoccupied, the houses locked up and the gardens left unkempt. Others have become virtual boarding houses for multiple tenants.

When announcing the backflip, Senator Sherry was unconvinced of the need, seeming to doubt the anecdotal evidence of the sales. Had his government not removed the reporting requirements, there would have been substantial evidence of what had become well-known in suburban Australia.

What this episode reveals is a Labor government out of touch with ordinary Australians. Kevin Rudd’s “big Australia”, driven by high rates of permanent and temporary immigration is threatening the liveability of the nation.

Before the 2007 election, Tanya Plibersek complained about the cost of housing. Under her watch as housing minister, homes have become even less affordable. Housing prices are 29 per cent above the long-term trend.

And the government’s response? A Population Minister who is confused about our future population needs and an inquiry that will report – you guessed it – after the next election!

Kevin Rudd not only believes that a population of 36 million by 2050 is good for Australia, but increasing numbers of foreigners should also be able to purchase our houses as well.

Senator Sherry’s unconvincing responses when commenting on the policy reversal suggest that Labor will relax the policy again in the future if it gets the chance.

42 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      05:59am | 29/04/10

      Seems that the Libs are claiming a new low in Hansonism. Again.
      But it aint dog whistling,it just has many of its similarities,so its all good.

    • Joe says:

      12:52pm | 29/04/10

      T.Chong is was Rudd who did this backflip on foreigners and housing. It is Rudd who is supposed to be running this nation.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      01:32pm | 29/04/10

      World record TC, Labor Luvvie and allround Neo Socialist mentions “dog whistling” in the first posting. Points deducted for not rolling out the old Labor party line on Tampa.

      Couldn’t you have at least screamed “racist!” at anyone who opposes Labor’s frog milkshake of an immigration “policy”?

      Good response though, but your failure to even address the issue means you have just accepted his argument.

      If it is not an issue, why would Rudd backflip on it?

      Classic Rudd lack of guts though, lets another junior Minister eat his sh1t sandwich and announce it Rudd’s policy failure. Add that to the long list of instances where Rudd hides and lets his lackeys do the dirty work.

      Still, you haven’t answered the question:

      If foreign ownership of our residential property is not an issue/not occurring/not a problem, why has Kevin Rudd backflipped on his policy here?

    • John A Neve says:

      04:05pm | 29/04/10

      Jack Thomas,
      I forgot to mention you narrow field of vision, this is not just about houses, rather it’s about the selling of our country. Added to which most houses sit on land or they used to.

      You trouble Jack, is to use the Bristish PM’s term, your bigoted.

    • John A Neve says:

      06:21am | 29/04/10

      Kevin,

      Much of what you say here is true, but also very biased. It upsets me that so much of our country has been sold to foreign interests, but who’s fault is it?

      Successive governments have allowed this to occure, in fact your governments have been in power for longer than the current one. So tell us Kevin who is at fault?

      In my view Australia’s land and inground assets should not be foreign owned, all Australian companies should be at least 51% in the hands of us.

      I am sorry Kevin but a succession of politicians have sold off the peoples assets, one side is no worse than the other.

    • Jack Thomas says:

      02:15pm | 29/04/10

      John, how can it be true, but biased? Same same but different.

      Sounds like T.Chong - it isn’t racist but it is. Err?

      Kevin Rudd changed the rules allowing foreign ownership of residential property, that is a fact.

      Rudd’s Labor changed the rules on foreign ownership of residential property in December 2008 then again in March 2009. Successive governments did not - not - allow this to occur.

      The LIbs had a policy on this, Rudd changed it.

      Is that simple enough for you GDoody etc.?

      Best if you check your facts John. Rudd caused this mess and it is obviously such an issue that he has to backflip on his changes.

      Also it might help if you go back and read the article. We are talking about housing, not companies.

      Statistics are very hard to get in this area, the weekly auction results are flawed, being tabulated by newspapers from information provided by real estate agents and differently calculated by each.

      The Age in Melbourne reported that real estate agency Marshall White says buyers from mainland China and Hong Kong kick-started Melbourne’s prestige property market last year and still account for a third of its sales. They have hired Mandarin-speaking sales executives to deal with overseas buyers and set up operations in China. To quote their agent “a few streets in the eastern suburbs of Kew and Balwyn were now 80 per cent Chinese-owned. They want to send their children to the best schools and think property here is cheap compared to the big cities in China, where you don’t get freehold ownership over land, just a 99-year lease.’‘

      Reserve Bank Chairman Ross Stevens said on the 27th March 2010 that foreign buyers are a factor in rising house prices and the RBA was monitoring how much the federal government’s decision last March to relax its rules on foreigners owning property had contributed to surging prices for housing.

      He said “the role of foreign purchases was an important one and it’s one we’re giving some attention to’‘.

      As usual though, Kevin Rudd’s policy backflip will cause just as many problems and be impossible to administer as his original policy failure.

      Foreign buyers can use Rudd’s change as a backdoor to getting residency here, using the fact that they own property here. Same thing when you buy a small business (like a fish and chip shop), with Rudd you get a passport with it.

      It will cost more than $1 Billion to clean up the Insulation mess that Peter Garrett and Kevin Rudd caused, what about this? 

      How will the FIRB be able to find, check and review the number of housing sales we see each week? I hope they have started recruiting, because this may be a massive job. Unless of course, the foreign buyers don’t know or don’t care to inform them?

      AFR - you can’t be that stupid that you don’t think you are unaffected? I’ll assume you went to the Labor / Union school of life, where your salary is provided to you by the taxpayer/university/public service, and therefore have little commercial knowledge.

      The fact is, when buyers are squeezed out of a suburb (as has occurred) they will move to another. As the Chinese continue to buy up in the Eastern suburbs, your house in Croydon becomes more desirable to the buyers being forced out.

    • John A Neve says:

      04:23pm | 29/04/10

      Jack Thomas,

      You ask “how can it be true, but biased?’  Simple Jack, what Kevin said is true, but he is biased because it applies to both sides of politics, they are both equally responsible. Got it now?

    • JRH says:

      07:31am | 29/04/10

      Can anyone sight a single statistic or suburb in relation to this: “The result was startling. In many suburbs, the majority of sales have been to overseas purchasers.” My understanding was it never got about 1%. Can we just make stuff up now?

    • AFR says:

      10:31am | 29/04/10

      Agree. Are you seriously suggesting some rich Chinese buying multi-million dollar properties somehow affects the value of my Croydon semi? Good-grief.

    • Chew says:

      03:32pm | 29/04/10

      Sure - Google The Age Business section, article dated 27 March 2010.

      The 1% figure you may be referring to is the percentage of housing vacant in Melbourne.

      Another stat you may have missed is the 16% price growth in residential housing in Melbourne for the last Quarter (from the time of Rudd’s change to the policy in late 2009).

    • persephone says:

      07:39am | 29/04/10

      I wasn’t going to comment but I can’t resist pointing out the caption to the photo:

      ‘Sydney real estate, now mostly owned by the Dutch a really rich Malaysia guy’

      So is Sydney real estate now mostly owned by the Dutch? Or a really rich Malaysia guy?

    • Mark says:

      09:44am | 29/04/10

      Or a really rich Malaysia guy who calls himself “the Dutch”, similar to the Fonz but into real estate

    • rich says:

      12:20pm | 29/04/10

      @mark -  ‘The Dutch’ - Thats exactly what I was thinking.

      For me, I don’t care who owns property, but it does sound like Rudd was embracing the ‘free market’ he was so quick to trash-talk back in 08/09.

    • persephone says:

      12:40pm | 29/04/10

      Who is ‘the Dutch’?

      How did he make so much money? (He must be richer than Gates, if he owns the majority of real estate in Sydney).

      With what sinister purpose has he purchased so much property?

      We need a good investigative journalist to get to the bottom of this!

    • Jack Thomas\ says:

      03:24pm | 29/04/10

      Well done persie, seems to be Labor’s new diversion tactic.

      Rudd quickly announces another tax, this time on the evil cigarette companies.

      Look! Unicorn, er sorry, new policy announcement. “This is a tough decision for the government,” he said. “It won’t win the government any popularity. The big tobacco companies will hate what we are doing. “It is the right decision.”

      Bollocks. This is yet again a knee jerk policy announced based on polling and to get himself out of strife.

      Is this his the ETS scheme in disguise? I guess this is now the “biggest moral challenge of our time’?

      Problem is, Rudd hasn’t realised the incidence of smoking is highly concentrated in the disadvantaged. This is effectively his tax on the poor. Nice one Kev, kick the battler accidentally while you’re kicking the non-voting fat cat.

    • persephone says:

      07:44am | 30/04/10

      Gees, can’t even have a frivolous moment without being accused of a political agenda.

      No wonder participation on this blog is actually making me more hard line!

      Kudos to Mark, who went up in my respect for being happy to play.

      Oh…and as for the tax on tobacco…pleased to support any measure which saves lives. My father died of lung cancer, if he hadn’t, he would most likely have been alive today and have got to see his grandkids.

    • Joe Blogs says:

      07:45am | 29/04/10

      Must be terribly frustrating to witness Labor morphing into Lib-Lite.
      Rudd,  as first genuine Baby Bommer PM , is cutting your lunch with ease and its merely becoming a battle between the selfish greedy bastards .

    • GDoody says:

      07:56am | 29/04/10

      Yep you are right, houses have become more unaffordable under Labor continuing the horrible slide that you people from the backward Howard tribe started. It must be irritating to look in the mirror, at a useless bureaucrat like Tanya Plibersek and see your own incompetence and loud talk? And a loud talking useless leftie oh the horror….!

      So let’s get the Liberal election platform logic right - you want us to vote for you because Labor sucks? Just because?

      Do you have any policy or plans for affordable housing or just alot of hate for Rudd and wonky logic as to why voters should vote for you?

      Andrews - go and get your fat pension - you deserve it mate….All that hard work and nation building and visionary ideas.

    • Lana says:

      07:58am | 29/04/10

      No Mr Andrews, Rudd has moved on already from this issue and all his other backflips and broken promises. Today we’re all meant to be focused on and applauding Kevin Rudd and team on their intention to make cigarette packets in plain packets. Haven’t you been briefed on what most of the tabloids are reporting and focusing on today? The important issues?

    • Labor is bad govt says:

      02:52pm | 29/04/10

      You know the ciggie companies will market cool branded cases which the govt can’t ban and it will be more attractive to youngsters. In addition any tobacco company lawyer will ask why alcoholic drinks subjected to those same standards? Bias? Or is Rudd too scared to take on the alcohol industry? Someone needs to teach ruddy the old lesson of look before you leap.

    • Bob says:

      08:20am | 29/04/10

      Mr Andrews, when I bought my unit you were in power. Under you the rates were going up and up and house prices were rising.

      You can’t surely expect us to believe you’d do something better this time.

      You had your chance and for a decade did nothing. Stop being a hypocrite now. It’s very hollow.

    • AC says:

      10:08am | 29/04/10

      Bob, your comments illustrate the ignorance of many regarding economics. When the Libs were in power, we had the greatest boom in our economy. Of course the rates will rise during this time. The RBA raises rates to control inflation, which gets out of control in a thriving economy if left unchecked. Fast forward to the current situation - we have the government spending(wasting) OUR money like its nothing to “stimulate our economy” and the RBA raising rates again to cool it down.

    • agblaster says:

      08:20am | 29/04/10

      Shadow Minister Andrews is suffering that especially Liberal Party ailment, short-term memory loss.

      Who was it who crowed that he didn’t hear too many home owners complaining about being made richer by rising house prices?

      Hmm? C’mon, Mr Andrews. 

      OK, lets jog your memory.  His first name was…. Peter.

      Remember now? ‘Course you do!

    • Johnny says:

      08:29am | 29/04/10

      Ha my word. Rudd has had zero policy success. His current plain package ciggie policy is his pathatic way of side tracking from 1) Poor health care policy or How I tried to save myself from embressment by throwing money to my State counterparts 2) Broken promise 1: More child care centers 3) Broken promise 2: Fed gov to deal 100% with health care 4) Broken promise 3: ETS policy implementation aka how I tried to impress my UN buddies and failed (again!)

      Poor Rudd ........

    • what he said says:

      09:36am | 29/04/10

      Getting priced out of my suburb started about 10 years ago… Has Rudd been in power THAT long?

      Oh wait, that was when the Liberal government installed the first home buyers grant. To what end? Sure, it allowed a lot of people to enter in to the Australian dream… but on top of creating a sellers market, it allowed the Real Estate agents to spike the prices every time an extension of the grant was announced. I’ve watched prices go from 185K for a 3 b’room house on 32 perch in 2000, to 500K for a 16 perch empty block in 2008, to one new house breaking the 900K mark this year… in what I consider a fairly average street/suburb.

      Rudd has helped perpetuate the situation and needs to shoulder some of the blame, but your party started the snowball rolling down the ‘unaffordable’ mountain a long time ago and is in no place to offer criticism.

    • Charles says:

      10:27am | 29/04/10

      Most of the housing unaffordability is related to local and state government policies and has nothing to do with the federal government.  The First Home Owners Scheme was a dumb thing initially introduced by the Hawke government after it was observed that the other two tiers of government had made things difficult to first home buyers.  Howard bought into this stupidity as well and continued it.

      The current stupidity of the federal ALP was not only the continuance and enlargment of the FHOS, but relaxing the rules in 2008 relating to overseas buyers.

      So, now we have all three tiers of government working in concert to raise the price of homes as that is where they are getting fairly large swedges of their income from via tax, so there is no governing desire to shrink the market.  It might be of interest at this point to see just how many of the factors making up the inflation rate are related to increases in developing, building, owning and rates on housing and property.  You will see that property is a large driver in the upgoing interest rates at present.

      This will continue presumably until at some point when interest rates are sufficiently high, that a large number of home-owners will foreclose and there will be a massive and rapid supply of housing put on the market, and a significant value correction will take place. Hundreds of thousands of people will then lose $ billions. 

      Mostly for this you can thank your local council who have driven up the land values for their own vested interest.

    • Pkelly says:

      11:51am | 29/04/10

      This would explain why Andrews has no policy - it’s not a national or strategic issue. Thankyou for explaining this.

    • Saskia says:

      10:49am | 29/04/10

      I live and own an inner city terrace in Sydney.  I am the only owner occupier in my street all others are owned by OS asians who have crammed up to 15 people in 3 bed houses!  This has all occurred in the last couple of years.  ALL the houses are unkempt beyond belief despite the exclusive area and the tenants being ‘educated’.

      If you twits and your ALP heros all want to keep you heads in the sand then so be it.  Australia is rapidly losing its national identity and out cities are becoming dirty, over populated crime ridden slums.

      I’m close to moving and may even leave this city completely.  Depressing.

    • Gerard says:

      11:47am | 29/04/10

      Get over it - I had 6 houses in my street bought up by OS people up under Howard. Australia can’t support these Liberal/Labor policies of importing 100000-200000 people are year.

      Seems like Howard (and the Liberals)  likes to babble on about “free markets”, globalism and neo-Liberalism while sucking on the State-tit of his pension, pretending to not be a socialist!

    • DWest says:

      11:56am | 29/04/10

      If Kevin Andrews has his way Australia will reach 33 million by 2050! Abbott and Andrews are copy-catting Kevin Rudd!

    • Darryl Price says:

      12:01pm | 29/04/10

      Please someone somewhere find a street with these houses left empty and unkempt.

    • Akmed Saleh says:

      12:05pm | 29/04/10

      Once again, housing affordibilility, the Australian Dream and all that it represents are under attack. The dark servants of Sauron are gathering in Mordor, orcs and goblins, elves gone over to the dark side, the wraith-like nazgul and the dark riders of historical mayhem, once more to shatter the traditions and peace of the good hobbits of Middle-earth.

      I refer, of course, to the ideological Right girding its loins for a fresh assault on the alleged incompetence of Labor in Australian history.

      A slew of dismal authors, unspeakable in their mediocrity and tendentiousness, presage a full-blooded campaign to destroy the most popular, the most unifying and the most historically sound celebration of our simple dreams in our national life.

    • stephen says:

      02:15pm | 29/04/10

      Kevin Rudd is changing Policy because changing events and circumstances require it. This is what effective and progressive Governments do.
      Additionally, there is a very important Budget looming, and money must be saved for a possible relapse of a recession (the Euro market.)
      The Labor Party is correctly responding to the future.
      Relax.

    • Luke says:

      02:45pm | 29/04/10

      stephen - is that you persephone?

    • stephen says:

      02:54pm | 29/04/10

      Hang on, I’ll check.

    • Henry says:

      03:07pm | 29/04/10

      Nice one Pers.  Progressive?  Hahahahahahaha….

    • fed up says:

      07:34pm | 29/04/10

      Andrew from what I was told, another reason the Chinese buyers have entered the market is the $300K purchase threshold was also removed. Hence the Melbourne blue chip market surge. Now to my knowledge, Labor have NOT reintroduced this. So as far as I can see it’s business as usual for foreign buyers borrowing at 1-2%.

      Andrew maybe for your next article you can explain Liberal immigration policy and why you don’t have the guts to enforce zero immigration. Also whether you will reverse foreign property ownership laws and ensure that NO foreigner can own Australian property. If you fail to do so, you are just as bad as Labor.

      All I can see is a whole lot of desperation in the community to own a home - renting from a Chinese National is not what Australians should have to put up with. What are YOU going to do about it?

    • Max Power says:

      08:04pm | 29/04/10

      Pretty simple solution, Non-Australian Citizens should not be allowed to buy houses or land in Australia. Australian’s First!

    • reddi says:

      12:47am | 30/04/10

      Both Labor and Liberal have sold the farm and the suburbs off to the highest bidder - that’s obvious. Rudd has exacerbated this problem and taken it to a whole new level. I don’t want to live in high rise, high density, crime ridden cesspools of cities and that’s where we are heading - FAST.

      Non Australians (including companies, trusts etc) prohibited from owning Australian property - now that’s a Liberal policy I’d vote for. Australia for Australians.

      Who do our governments work for anyway? Right now they seem to be working for the The UN, and for the major corporations - when will our so called ‘democracy’ actually work?

      The two party system is a big fat sham and distraction and we should have a board in charge. It honestly could not get much worse. (except of course if the ETS had been introduced)

      Time to step up Liberal party - ignore these issues at your peril - the electorate is stirring and they want immediate action.

    • H of SA says:

      04:00pm | 30/04/10

      Foreigners bad - Rudd bad - Liberals good.

      Can’t you do better?

    • Properties Croydon says:

      12:58am | 06/05/10

      Politics 101 : Lie and lie some more and people will get confused enough that they will think that you are telling the truth.

    • Mike says:

      10:55am | 11/05/10

      Australia is headed for social disaster. Most Gen Xers were happy to rent when they left home and then get a house when they married. Now that idea has DISAPPEARED. A whole generation of people will have it WORSE than their parents. Renting was once considered for poor people druggies etc. Now everyone will have to do it. If you can’t buy a house or have a house in Australia what is your worth? What do you have to work for? Australia will have crime ghettoes as the have no house families will be condemned to poverty. Poverty will increase on a massive scale thanks to the stupid idiots we have had in charge of our country. People think Hansonism was bad…..

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

David Penberthy

Wine fans: our Punch profile on the excellent Ray Beckwith, the 100 year old chemist who helped make Penfolds great http://t.co/ftFHu2oy

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter