Oh, so you’re not having an affair? How very boring, and so 1995. Haven’t you heard the way to go now if you are seriously dedicated to keeping your marriage alive is to have a ‘playfair’, or three?

Is it unrealistic to want a free pass to sleep with someone else?

English sociologist, Dr Catherine Hakim proposes that monogamy was never meant to be sustained as long as it is now, and that rather than struggle in long marriages against the urge to enjoy the thrill of seduction, we should rewrite the rules to allow a little on the side. Or a lot.

“Anyone rejecting a fresh approach to marriage and adultery, with a new set of rules to go with it, fails to recognise the benefits of a revitalised sex life outside the home,” she writes in her book Internet Dating, Playfairs and Eriotic Power.

“As dating websites open up a global shop window of sexual possibilities, as life expectancy continues to rise and we become increasingly sexually aware, how can we still take the crushing old rules of fidelity, that turn marriage into a prison, for granted?”

Sex, is no more a moral issue than eating a good meal – and you don’t need to do either all the time at home, she argues.

Apparently, her ideas are gaining traction. Writing in the UK Telegraph one married journalist remarked how she felt daggy at a party she attended where the married woman she was chatting with couldn’t wait to fob her off so she could flirt with an attractive man.

“While I was discussing Downton Abbey, Alice had been selecting a lover. I’d been wondering if I’d catch the Tube or a night bus, she’d been mentally donning her Agent Provocateur thong,” wrote Julia Llewellyn-Smith.

“Modern her. Fuddy me. Because infidelity, it seems, is ‘hot’ for 2013, like stripes and Bermuda shorts.”

The woman, who ended up having an affair with a dad from the school-gate, is part of what Hakim argues is a necessary revision of our marital expectations.

We over-invest in the idea of romantic love, and should embrace a French-style openness in which both partners are free to have discreet ‘playfairs’, so long as the other parties understand the player has no intention of getting a divorce.

The theory goes that marriages with less rigid confines last longer, and provide more personal “happiness”.

What’s interesting about this “Re-write the Rules” push is at that at the same time the virtues of old-fashioned marriage are also enjoying high-profile support.

At an Oscars dominated by cynical parody, Ben Affleck used his acceptance to speech to acknowledge what a slog long-term marriage can be, but how worthwhile, for him, that is.

Affleck made the more worldly members of the audience cringe when he acknowledged his wife, Jennifer Garner, for “working on our marriage for 10 Christmases”. “It’s good, it IS work, but it’s the best kind of work, and there’s no one I’d rather do it with,” he said.

He was cheered by many family-focused websites for “an honest and accurate description of what marriage is”. “No one has an effortless marriage,” remarked a columnist the big women’s site Café Mom, celebrating Affleck’s willingness to keep plugging away, rather than playing away.

At the same time, other traditional style marital trappings, such as the big-deal wedding, and changing your name to your husband’s are well and truly back in.

One Australian blogger last week said she was starting to regret not changing her name, because Sunday Style columnist Zoe Foster-Blake had had “Mr and Mrs Blake” engraved on her wedding table cutlery.

It feels quite fascinating to see the two trendy schools of thought on what makes for wedded bliss (or durability) playing out simultaneously, and clearly personal choice is key.

If both partners are able to handle the other’s freedom within a committed marriage, it’s hard to find moral fault with that.

But for those nostalgics who, like me, prefer to engage in only one relationship at a time – no matter the “work” – it sounds like a brave new love-life we’re quite happy to let the more adventurous (and emotionally robust) have.

Comments on this post will close at 6pm AEDT.

Most commented

39 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Vicki PS says:

      06:14am | 10/03/13

      Didn’t we go through all this open marriage stuff in the ‘70s?  To my recollection, open arrangements lasted about 2 years max.  By then, couples had either decided it was more trouble than fun and gone back to fidelity, or they had split up.

    • SAm says:

      08:39am | 10/03/13

      Tobias:”..I advised people to explore an open relationship..”
      Lindsay:“Did it work for those people?”
      Tobias: “No. It Never Does. These people somehow delude themselves thinking it might….......but it might work for us!”

    • jtz says:

      08:41am | 10/03/13

      I thought there was more to marriage then sex. If the only reason you marry someone is that the sex is good then it wont last.

    • Ladyjane says:

      09:29am | 10/03/13

      I knew a few people with so-called ‘open marriages’ in the 70s and 80s and they played out exactly how you have described. It inevitably turned out that one partner wanted to sleep around and the other went along with it because they wanted to keep the relationship. Fast forward a few years and it was all over. It’s never going to work if one partner is into it and the other is really not.

      I do know one couple who are still together, but they seem to be a perfect match and have few boundaries, including discussing their children’s sexual adventures with aquaintances who really don’t want to hear it over dinner. I recall attending a BBQ at their house in the 80s and the hostess and one of the single male guests retired to the marital bedroom for a while. While the rest of us exchanged shocked looks and raised eyebrows, hubby just continued cooking his BBQ. Still together and still strong.

    • bj says:

      10:41am | 10/03/13

      Add to that the number of people who want to trade up and all of the people who can pretend to be something that they are not. The swingers scene is full of empty promises.

    • ZAck says:

      11:32am | 10/03/13

      Yeah this was all done in thr 70’s and had a revival in the late 90s I believe.

    • Milly says:

      08:15am | 10/03/13

      I guess it’s how you understand ‘love’.  Traditional marriage involved ‘forsaking all others’. If you don’t believe that that is what marriage is all about then I don’t think a person should get married.  The human heart yearns for love. I can’t imagine that any healthy human being would want to be simply one of many lovers.  Love , committed love, takes more than just feelings and sexual attraction.  Sleeping around is obviously a lifestyle some people choose but it cannot be compared to true love.

    • bec says:

      08:22am | 10/03/13

      In the rare instance where a married couple are comprised of two people with exactly the same views and desires on an open marriage, it would need to be an exceptional couple to make it work.

      The same consideration, trust, compassion, adventurousness, respect and gender progressiveness that allows for the best monogamous marriages to survive are needed in triplicate for an open marriage.

      Methinks Gazza, who might be so keen for all the sanctioned pornstar sex he feels entitled to, might not be so happy for Shazza to likewise explore her own sexuality away from him in a likewise manner. 

      Sadly, for most, doomed to fail.

    • Patrick says:

      08:46am | 10/03/13

      People whose highest priority is to enjoy themselves no matter the pain the cause to others will probably agree. I’ll bet their atheists too.

      At the end the government will step in, and fund the abortions, the broken marriages, the drugged and violent children and their predatory immoral parents who of course have a vote as well.

      The prognosis of the west is bleak and no wonder reading this.

    • Sickemrex says:

      10:49am | 10/03/13

      How much you want to bet?

    • bec says:

      11:13am | 10/03/13

      What do their atheists do? I wish I was able to possess an atheist.

    • TheRealDave says:

      12:42pm | 10/03/13

      Yes, because nothing bad every happened in a mirage of religious people, ever.

      Tool

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      01:39pm | 10/03/13

      Come on, Patrick your assumption that “people whose highest priority is to enjoy themselves, no matter the pain they cause” are probably Atheists” cannot go unanswered for you seem to assume that Atheists have no morals, no ethics, no standards, no loyalty, they seek abortions, produce drug-dependent, violent children.
      Not so, Patrick, not so. Buddhists would be classed as being Atheists for they acknowledge no other-worldly, supernatural, omnipotent, omniscient being. Not that they, just like all those who belong to some religion, are perfect but many try their best to live under a very strict set of rules:
      A set of Precepts which were created by Siddhattha Gotama (later called “the Buddha” or Enlightened One - but never a god or the son of one) over 500 years Before Jesus started teaching almost identical rules!
      “I will not kill, I will not speak ill of my neighbour, I will not be jealous of what my neighbour has, I will not lie (bear false witness), I will not commit adultery” to mention just a few - a few very familiar tenets for Jews, Christians & Muslims alike!!
      people being people will always have problems, irrespective of their religion or lack of it, despite those differences some stick together for 60 & more years. Some simply can’t hack it. How often do we hear of a couple who have split up and amongst the reasons given for doing so are the claim that “She/He Changed after we got married & became a different person”, “She/he became violent physically and/or emotionally”.
      I well remember a couple I had known for decades. They had been together for longer than I had known them without getting married. They had, by choice, no children. Suddenly, after all that time, they announced they were getting married. Three months after they did that they were no longer speaking to each other. Six months & they had split up. Twelve months & they got divorced. They have never spoken to each other since. The break-up was not because of one or other straying. No-one could understand what it was about marriage which had spelt the end to what had been a loving, friendly partnership. We still can’t.

    • LJ Dots says:

      02:02pm | 10/03/13

      Well, this is a search I never imagined I would undertake.

      Googling Christian Swingers clubs gave over 1 million results. Atheist Swinger clubs gave around one quarter the results. I’m so angry right now,  I just want to shake my fist at those immoral Christians for stealing our swinging.

      Oh, if you don’t hear from me for a few days, it’s only because I’m reformatting my hard drive to destroy the evidence - there is no way my wife will believe me when I say I was ‘only researching’ something.

    • Sickemrex says:

      02:22pm | 10/03/13

      @ bec, I have a whole set of them. Sometimes they’re over here, sometimes over there.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      09:18am | 10/03/13

      Hi Wendy,

      Everyone has very different and conflicting views on what a good marriage is supposed to be like in reality.  At this day and age you would find especially in the most conservative societies with very strong religious upbringing, a typical marriage has gone through very drastic changes.  Monogamy means staying with the same person for the rest of our lives, right?  However the reality is very different all together as some of us have been discovering to certain extent that some marriages are simply falling apart while others are sort of standing strong on the surface only. So what makes a marriage stronger or weaker than the rest?

      With the highly competitive life styles full of stress most couples don’t have the time to sit down and talk about what they truly expect from each other.  The communication breakdown and loss of respect can actually spell the end of a very serious commitment such as a marriage, right?  Maybe for some but for others it is more about keeping up appearances just to please others around them.  So we have to ask ourselves even if all else fails beyond repair, is it actually worth the trouble to stay together and opt out to have a secret double life? 

      In the recent years I have discovered that some people who may think that they have a good marriage are merely living with such indifference to their situation that you have to wonder how did we get so complacent and learnt to settle for less?  So at the end of the day a marriage just like any other relationship simply needs goo communication skills combined with lots of respect.  Even when the romantic phase may end there still might be a chance of working things out simply by talking to each other. Kind regards.

    • tez says:

      01:43pm | 10/03/13

      I really don’t think respect should need all that much talking about it should be someting that is ingrained in us to be given freely without it being negotiated.
      contentment is what seem to be missing in people now, all the extras either sexual or material that are wanted/needed to make us happy or gratified are obviously tempting
      The very simlpe pleasure of just being a couple or famiy whether streight or gay should not be all that difficult.

    • Mik says:

      09:45am | 10/03/13

      All old hot. Why bother. As though one relationship isn’t hard enough work. I don’t envy the cultures where multiple partners are expected.

    • Jacki says:

      09:46am | 10/03/13

      Sad but true, according to adult sex-entertaining industry, the majority of clients who attend brothels (legal or illegal) are married men.

    • ByStealth says:

      03:20pm | 10/03/13

      Some books written by prostitutes give insight into why this is.

      tldr; they aren’t getting either love or sex at home.

    • Anjuli says:

      09:46am | 10/03/13

      A friends husband thought he would have a bit on the side, in fact he had 4 women on the side told his wife , maybe before some one else did . The wife tried for 4 years to keep it together ,had a light bulb moment one night told him she could not do this any more . During the course of going through the divorce thing ,he blamed her !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

    • Ladyjane says:

      12:48pm | 10/03/13

      I once knew a couple where the husband was a cheater throughout the entire marriage of over 20 years, with multiple women. He was nothing near discreet. The wife eventually had enough and walked off into the sunset with his best friend. The fall-out from that was interesting, because he expected sympathy and the males in the group seemed to think he deserved it because it was his best friend who she’d cheated with.  Apparently that’s supposed to be worse than the public humiliation to which he’d subjected her for years.

    • Katie says:

      10:27am | 10/03/13

      Why is marriage always considered ‘hard work’, anyway? If it’s so hard, why are people bothering to get married in the first place?

      Though I’m not married yet - soon! - I wouldn’t say co-habiting with my fiance is difficult. Nor am I feeling sexually limited… if I was after something in particular, I know my partner would probably try to accomidate. If you’re not getting what you need in your relationship, perhaps you’re not ready for one… or you’re not communicating with your partner well.

      I can think of a simple solution though, if you really need to ‘play’ outside of marriage… bring the third person in and share them wink That should give you all the variety you need.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:10am | 10/03/13

      Silly primate mating games are not very interesting…....

    • Ken Davis says:

      11:31am | 10/03/13

      Or…we could learn how to make marriages better. Create a society that teaches and fosters love, affection, commitment, attachment and time together.  No. That would never do. Might eat into the capitalists profits.

    • Hekate says:

      12:33pm | 10/03/13

      My husband and I have been in a very loving and committed relationship for over 10 years. Over this time, we have often had a special friend - always a female, that we both enjoy immensely. We do not have or want a permanent 3 some, but we do enjoy the company of a special friend. It is not just about the sex either, as it is a loving tender togetherness that we all have, and we do social things together as well. I dont see anything wrong with this - as long as it is mutual, and one partner is not being bullied into the situation. I cant abide bullying or Lying and cheating. Everything is all out in the open and we have guidlines, of what is expected from all. It has made our relationship a lot closer and stronger, and our sex lives have grown amazingly - instead of diminishing over that time period - like many do !!!

    • Faith says:

      03:14pm | 10/03/13

      Just keep telling yourself that there is nothing wrong with a threesome,  or including a special someone in your marital bed, I suppose there is a justification or everything, isn’t there? Just to make you feel better.

      You could have done this without having gotten married, which is usually to foresake all others. I guess that everyone wants to redefine marriage these days to mean whatever they want it to mean at that moment in time.

    • Sergeant Schultz says:

      12:40pm | 10/03/13

      Reading these comments , i feel a sense of disbelief at what seems to be near total disregard for committment made within the bounds of marriage . Why bother with marriage in the first place…obviously , one or the other , or even both partners , lied whilst making vows . The true committment of marriage is demeaned by the view that there is no real obligation to stay with the committment. For the sake of the reality nd strength of traditional marriage…don’t commit to it if you have no intention of staying within the bounds of fidelity .
      Leave the wonderful institution of marriage to those who lovingly commit to each other for life.

    • Sanity says:

      01:56pm | 10/03/13

      And yet we seem to have this somewhat antiquated view that gay people can’t get married, despite some of them being in relationships as long as straight couples. Explain that?

    • Sickemrex says:

      02:41pm | 10/03/13

      @ Sergeant Schultz, reading your comments, I feel a sense of disbelief at what seems to be near disregard for English comprehension. Most commenters seem to think that infidelity ruins marriage. I hope you’re not one of these people that moans about declining education standards.

    • Faith says:

      12:47pm | 10/03/13

      Why even get married? Why bother with the wedding and the party and all the organising, celebrating with family and friends, to only have sex with anyone you want to anyway?

      If you don’t care about someone enough to be faithful to them, and you do not want to put in the effort to maintain a friendly, loving and caring relationship with the person you married, why bother getting married at all?

      What a horrible thing to promote to people, that it is okay and “move to 2013” and you can have sex with whomever you want, as traditional marriage is so boring and we need excitement in our selfish lives. Why not try to make it exciting with the one you married?

    • tez says:

      12:49pm | 10/03/13

      HIV did more to curbed the sexual behavior of people in the 80’s the old grim reaper commercials made it clear that heterosexuals were included.

    • bananabender says:

      03:23pm | 10/03/13

      The Grim Reaper ads were total BS to placate the homosexual community. At the time it was known that heterosexuals were at negligible risk of contracting HIV from oral or vaginal sex. Two decades later there still has been almost no HIV transmission to anyone except gay men and IV drug takers in Australia.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      01:05pm | 10/03/13

      Is the answer to have an automatic option built into “marriage” which is activated once ever 10 years with couples being asked if they want to remain in the marriage or get out of it.
      Both parties would have to agree Yes or No.
      If a couple both said they wanted out of their business arrangement then there would be an automatic Half’n'Half split of their assets & both provide for all the children. Cut out the nonsense that exists today whereby the Courts can, & do, award one side bloody well near the lot & to add sulphuric acid to the wound, orders the partner who has missed out to also pay ALL the support for any children. The parents be required to share the upbringing, such as it is today, of all the children. The Family homes gets put on the market & they equally share the proceeds. Maybe it would be mandatory that those proceeds even get split three ways: 1/3rd each to the two partners & 1/3rd being placed in trust for the children until the youngest turns 25 & that is then split between those children.
      Could it work?
      Maybe, maybe not.
      What do you think?

    • ramases says:

      01:26pm | 10/03/13

      Oh goody, another expert to poke fun at because she obviously thinks that sex is the be all and end all of marriage. I’ve got news for her its not, its commitment, responsibility,yes that word again, respect and a braider of other things that go into making a relationship.
        What she is counselling people to do is quite wrong morally, and ethically but then again she is an expert whose only contact with marriage has probably ended on tears and recriminations because of the lack of the above.
      I’ve been married over 40 years and never even crossed my mind to stray as I love my wife and all those other crap things that are now being washed down the drain.

    • cornflake says:

      01:28pm | 10/03/13

      My husband has a healthy/high sex drive. I knew this from the start. My husband sleeps with other women whereas I am monogamous. I don’t feel the desire to sleep with other men. 

      I am proud of him when he finds attractive women. Sometimes he gets the run around from some women which frustrates us both. At night, we sometimes discuss his better encounters & I find this very exciting for myself in part because like most women, I am bisexual. 

      Some of my interests, he’s not that interested in but I get time to do these whilst he is partaking in these activities. I don’t feel threatened by the women because he’s mature & knows all women are annoying to men & as are all men annoying to women at some point or another & he wouldn’t want to add to his woes. Anyway I get the concept that diversity is exciting hence why I don’t own one pair of shoes or one dress & only travel to one country.  If I felt threatened, I suppose I may focus more on my health & appearance & being more polite towards my husband as sometimes I can interrupt him & talk nearly all night. I like that it makes him happy because I care about his happiness a great deal.

      We don’t have or plan to have children. I think that may be the point. If you have children you really have to responsibly spend a lot more time together doing the same things than if you are childless & have your own personality more clearly defined within a relationship.

      If some women are angry by men being interested in other women, i’d say maybe if some men have a high libido, they didn’t choose when they were born for that to eventuate & if he’s like that it can be really frustrating if there’s no outlet available. So he gets upset. Because men can get upset too.

      I don’t have any regrets. We are mostly happy & hardly fight.

    • Xeric says:

      01:38pm | 10/03/13

      “If both partners are able to handle the other’s freedom within a committed marriage, it’s hard to find moral fault with that”

      If you’re happy about your partner having sex with someone else on regular basis then neither of you are committed.

      It’s a nice theory Wendy - a bit of hot nooky after 20 years with the same person but it *never* works.

      Even if they say it’s “OK”... it isn’t….

    • R. Sole says:

      01:54pm | 10/03/13

      To say not having an affair is like wearing nanna pants in our go go g string society and behind the times simply positions the topic as clickbait and glosses over the real issues at stake in an unhappy marriage.

      Openning up the marriage is code for the marriage is failing and soon to be over, just the specifics need to be played out.

      A marriage that two people are committed to make successfull where the entire family is supported physically (as in physical health), emotionally, financially, mentally and socially is so far beyond sexual gratification of the parents as to elevate marriage to another level.

      It is a committment to others you love and care about before your own satisfaction. Not giving up your needs, just putting them behind theirs. Delaying your own gratification because seeing and feeling your family being gratified first is more rewarding.

      Anyone that thinks f-ing around is the cure or shortcut out of a dysfunctional marriage needs to explore what is missing from their own and address the specifics.

      And you dont have to do this alone. We have never had more available to us to support our mental health. There are armies of counsellors and psychologists that are waiting to help.

    • Reenie says:

      02:18pm | 10/03/13

      You might not like the style of shoes I wear, or if I wear shoes at all.. but as an adult I can do what I please. As long as I’m respectful and honest about what I’m doing and why I do it.. is there really a probleml?
      There are limits to the number of ‘new things’ that two people can discover, even with the internet, and boredom is the real relationship killer.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

ToryShepherd

@benpobjie @jessadamson7 @jhwakelin kinda creepy from a high school cheerleader #misheardlyrics

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter