Inspired by season two of Masterchef, the Canberra press gallery is feverishly cooking up a storm over an apparent leadership challenge to Kevin Rudd. But while too many cooks appear to be spoiling the journalistic broth in our Nation’s Capital, there are 5 good reasons why Rudd will lead the ALP to the next Federal election.

What are the odds… Picture: AFP

It’s too close to the election

Any political strategist will tell you that it does not make political sense to change leaders so close to an election. Changing leaders this close makes the race a more even playing field, something that the government wants to avoid. The contest becomes about two new leaders trying to win familiarity with the electorate (Gillard and Abbott), rather than a contest between a known quantity (Rudd) and one that is recognised but risky (Abbott).

The major advantage of an incumbent is that voters are more comfortable with the devil they know. While Tony Abbott is well known in the electorate, he is untested as a political leader.  Rudd is a known quantity as a leader and the Australian electorate, while annoyed with him, are likely to stick with the devil they know.

The same dynamic is operating in the NSW Liberal Party. Even though Barry O’Farrell’s personal approval rating is rock bottom, are the NSW Liberals likely to change at this late stage to someone like Mike Baird? The advantage of incumbency means this is highly unlikely, although not impossible.

Gillard is a gun, but not a silver bullet

One of the criticisms of Rudd among the political commentariat is his desire to channel the government’s achievements through his own super human efforts. This analysis has focused disproportionate attention on Rudd’s personality, and by extension the popularity of Gillard’s personality.

While personality is important in any election campaign, it is ultimately superficial. In choosing who to vote for, Australian electors inevitably consider the character of the two leaders but move beyond personality politics to the menu of policies and achievements on offer. That is why it is dangerous to focus on Gillard as a silver bullet without looking at the broader picture.

Labor strategists know this and need to move the focus to these broader policies and achievements. While Gillard is a good politician and an excellent communicator, installing her as leader would be a superficial answer to a deeper challenge of communicating the guts of the government’s platform.  If the food is average, changing the waiter makes little difference.

The tide is turning on the mining tax

It’s true the mining profits tax was not sold well in its early stages, but the tide is turning. The primary reason is not Kevin Rudd, but rather the internal economics of the mining companies.

Mining companies need certainty for projects because the impact of the tax needs to be factored into complex calculations. Those calculations are important for driving businesses forward and need to be resolved. Mining companies have been advocating for a profits-based tax for years, so the essence of the tax is no surprise to them. What is a surprise is the time taken to nut out the details and therefore make decisions about how to move forward.

While Twiggy Forest and Clive Palmer are grandstanding, more serious mining executives are nervous about when the pantomime will end and real negotiations will resolve the issue. Similarly, small and medium sized mining companies are hankering to rid themselves of the production based royalty scheme.

Companies also need time to make sure they manage their share price. One of the main functions of a corporate Board is to ensure the share price is going in the right direction for the benefit of shareholders and for themselves (Board members are usually shareholders too). But the longer things stay uncertain, the more share markets are likely to price in this uncertainty, and share prices could fall.

There are business incentives for the mining side to come to agreement as soon as possible, just as there are political incentives on the government to come to agreement before an election.

Rudd will be pragmatic

Rudd is politically pragmatic and will take advice on the key policies and messages that are required to win the election.

It would be different if Rudd was more like Turnbull – a maverick who believed his judgment was superior to all others. While Rudd clearly has a healthy dose of self confidence, he is not a political martyr, and is already this week moving back to a disciplined message, rallying the troops and delegating the mining profits tax for others in Cabinet to resolve.

It’s the economy, stupid

Putting aside the previously poor communication on the mining super profits tax, Rudd and Labor have a great story to tell on health reform, building the education revolution, the national broadband network, company tax cuts and an increase in super from 9% to 12%.

But the icing on the cake is that Rudd and Labor successfully shepherded Australia through the Global Financial Crisis. The fact is that the government’s stimulus package worked, and worked well, and Australia was the most successful OECD country in avoiding recession. Labor’s success in managing through the GFC undermines one of the Coalition’s traditional strengths – the mantle of responsible economic manager – and this is a powerful position to put forward in a campaign.

Most commented

39 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:47am | 21/06/10

      Whistling past the graveyard. How ‘bout that Penrith by-election?

      All intelligent Australians know it wasn’t the “stimulus” rort that got Australia through the recession, but the mining industry fuelled by Chinese demand. And now Rudd’s trying to mess that up.

      This PM is past his use-by date.

    • Andrew says:

      10:36am | 21/06/10

      “Whistling past the graveyard.”

      Gold! Pure Gold!

    • persephone says:

      06:26pm | 21/06/10

      The Penrith by election is a warning to the NSW government, not the Federal one.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:26am | 21/06/10

      Insulation debacle, ETS ‘shelving’, asylum debacle, debt, lies (no government use of tax payer monies to fund government ads, fiscal conservative), temper issues, use of bad language, health care still not sorted out, the mining tax and the risk of more tax if labor comes in again and spendwaste their way with taxpayer monies. I think those are good reasons why rudd must go. Simple.

    • persephone says:

      06:30pm | 21/06/10

      It’s ironic - you had to invent the lies.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:35am | 22/06/10

      HaHa sure I have said lies, must be why the polls and the people of Penrith have voted against labor. Maybe I can use my power to save the homeless and the fate of this country under rudd .

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:20am | 21/06/10

      “While personality of the leaders is important in any election campaign, it is ultimately superficial. In choosing who to vote for, Australian electors inevitably move beyond personality politics to the menu of policies and achievements on offer.”

      I call bullshit, you give way to much credit to the voting public. We voted in Rudd and he had the exact same policies as Howard and a track record of incompetence in state government. The reason he was so successful is because so many people simply got sick of howard and liked the new conservative personality of Rudd. A change for changes sake.

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:30am | 21/06/10

      Your mining Point is fairly ambitous. Any negative felt my a mining company (i.e share price falls) will be just as worrying for the government particular with the promise of improving the sector by taxing it more.

      Mining companies have long term business plans, and a liberal win even as late as April with no tax will provide a major boost to thier share prices effectively negating any short term losses on the horizon.

      Secondly this removal of royalties is such a blatant misdirection. Royalties are not going anywhere they will simply be re imburst at todays prices. The devil is in the detail which I am not privy too, but what is stopping state governments from raising royalties in the future? In which case was is the advantages of the new tax for the mining companies?

      Actually don’t worry I just read your Bio and realised I simply wasted my time. My mistake will try and be more vigilant in the future.

    • Super D says:

      08:36am | 21/06/10

      “The tide is turning on the mining tax”.  That really did crack me up.  Not even the government believes that - hence the need to cough up $2 billion to get something positive out of Telstra.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      08:49am | 21/06/10

      “The tide is turning on the mining tax”. 

      I thought that was hilaruious too.

      Ranks right up there with “the greatest moral challenge of our lifetime” as the mother of all spin.

      Is that the best Labor acolytes and flunkies can come up with?

    • AdamC says:

      09:55am | 21/06/10

      Of course the tide isn’t turning on the mining tax, but Ben is right that miners will be increasingly keen to do some sort of a deal. That will help to neutralise it as an issue.

      On the broader questions of leadership and the like, Ben is actually fairly correct. Except to say that the government’s ‘achievements’ are different to most’s in that they haven’t yet happened. Rudd would benefit from a big-ticket term two agenda item.

      Even without one of those, though, the ALP should still win the election. However, one more toxic policy, one more colossal stuff-up might be enough to put them shocking government to sleep.

      PS, Gillard is no panacea. She’s in the Kevin07 honeymoon phase, that’s all. When the full glare of scrutiny falls upon her, she’ll get stale just as fast as Dudd.

    • Andrew says:

      10:35am | 21/06/10

      My absolute favourite comments here was: “It’s to close to the election”

      Really?? Um.. correct me if I’m wrong but Bob Hawke rolled Hayden while Fraser was on the way to the GG’s place. Exactly 1 month before the election???

      As for the second point “Gillard’s no silver bullet” maybe given my comment above you could change that to “Gillard’s no silver bodgie”.

      And finally as for Rudd being a known quantity and Abbott being a risk, mate you can run that line ad nauseum, I think it’s the point, Rudd is a known quantity with a history of complete failure.

      What I love about this article is I don’t think it’s written to convince me or any other reader, I think the author’s trying to convince himself. Why don’t you go and have a chat to Richo, he seems to have a different opinion to yours, of course you probably have more experience than him. If you can’t get on to him maybe call Hawkie, Iemma, Costa or Latham, they all seem to think the world of Rudd.

      Hehehehehe.

    • Greg says:

      02:02pm | 21/06/10

      You want one more toxic policy!
      How about all telstra and cable broadband customers, just a few million of them [ and announced on a Sunday! ]  shafted over to NBN at whatever unknown cost/reliability whether they want it or not.
      If I was a telstra customer I would be demanding to know what the rates would be.

    • AdamC says:

      02:35pm | 21/06/10

      Andrew, no silver bodgie indeed. The scarlet widgie, perhaps? (I’m going to start using that.) In any event, she’s more likely to be knifing Dudd after the election than before.

      I agree that this article, and other like it doing the rounds, are intended to reassure the ALP base that, despite the epic scale of the stuff-ups and incompetence of this government, Aussies will probably be masochistic enough to give them another chance. (Like they did with Whitlam.) Quite a call to rally the troops - “We’re on the nose, but don’t quite stink enough to be tossed into the dustbin of history yet. Hang in there!”

      Greg, I haven’t really looked at this NBN Telstra deal. The NBN could go either way for the government, though. Unfortunately, it’s more of a long-term matter.

    • Front says:

      07:36pm | 22/06/10

      Not sure AdamC.
      The mining companies have just realised that they might actually get rid of Labor and crunch the unions at the same time.
      Game now completely changed. This has more in common with the Waterfront Dispute than the Petroleum Tax.
      Another $10 million in yesterday, with a further $50m to go on top of the $100m they have already committed to.
      It’s worth billions to them to kill the Feds, and they are gamblers.  $200m is nothing compared to what they get from keeping the unions out of the Pilbara.
      BHP to announce pullout of Roxby expansion two weeks into campaign, anyone?

    • Brad Coward says:

      11:44am | 21/06/10

      Ben, you’ve guaranteed yourself a safe Labor seat in some parliament with your glowing review.  As a piece designed to change opinion or garner support for the Rudd government….you’ve guaranteed yourself a safe Labor seat.

    • Nick says:

      12:44pm | 21/06/10

      The Rudd Government has been written off to early and Ben Heraghty is right to identify the unknown quantity that is Tony Abbott. Dig a little deeper and Abbott truly is the Liberal Party’s answer to Mark Latham.

      Equally, don’t underestimate Rudd’s determination and ruthlessness. It is possible to be be personally disliked as a leader, but respected for your strength of leadership. Howard had this in spades.

      A well conceived article.

    • Roja says:

      06:41pm | 21/06/10

      In the past 2 weeks Abbott’s popularity has marginally improved.  What was the tactic he used to achieve this? He kept his mouth shut. 

      Considering that one overly aggressive handshake killed Latham (there were many other reasons of course, but that is what many people remember), if Abbott simply hides in a bunker til election day then the liberals are in with a real chance.  God help them if they let Tony have another debate, he’s not good when it comes to speaking and utterly terrible at improvising.  Probably the only politician honest enough to admit he is a liar, however we simply can’t have that inability in a PM.  Bold face lying is a mandatory skillset for anyone to lead a country.

      That he EVER contemplated that Barnaby Joyce could take a cabinet position involving numbers, surely says everything you ever needed to know.

    • Gary Cox says:

      01:04pm | 21/06/10

      Abbott is the Liberal Party’s Latham? I reckon Rudd has more in common with Latham than Abbott. Both of them are psycho and unpredictable for starters where as Abbott strikes me a a bit of a cruiser.

      As for Rudd having strength in leadership, that is laughable. The bloke has shown no leadership qualities. I don’t call believing that something is the great moral challenge of our time and doing nothing about it because it was too hard strength in leadership.

    • nosthow says:

      01:08pm | 21/06/10

      Kevin Rudd will not only lead Labor to the next election - he will easily win the next election, casting aside Abbott , a man who only won the Liberal leadership by 1 vote because no-one else wanted it and they did not want Turnbull - hardly a convincing vote of confidence there Tony !

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      01:48pm | 21/06/10

      Nosthow , heh heh heh , Gillard’s number crunching has seen her a bit short of the required figure , but she sure is working on it.
      Good weekend result for the Libs , but the downward trend of Green preference flow to Labor will leave Krazy Kev chewing his nails as well as his ear wax.

    • Tim says:

      02:30pm | 21/06/10

      Forget about Joe Hockey did we?

      And what bearing does the margin of an internal leadership vote have on how the electorate votes? You really think anyone contemplating voting for the Libs would be thinking “Oh he only beat Turbnbull by one vote, so therefore I shouldn’t vote for him”? Wishful thinking.

      Apart from Turnbull’s occasional sniping from the sidelines, the Liberal party is united behind Abbott. In the meantime, with every new poll painting bleaker pictures for the Labor party, they’re forced closer and closer to a critical decision: Dump Rudd or not?

      Look, you can continue to live in denial all you like but it will be much easier if you face facts: Labor are in trouble. Whether or not you agree with the mining tax there can be no doubt that the process itself has been botched, and that more than anything has been the cource of the current backlash.

      On that note I have a challenge for you, and the rest of your Labor True Believer chums (Persephone, T Chong, Christian Real, and that Rob guy).  Now I don’t know how the election is going to play out. I do know that Abbott is in with a much better chance than he had 6 months ago, and I reckon it could go either way at this point.
      You guys however seem to believe that everything will come up roses for Kevin no matter what. So here it is: What are you willing to do if Labor doesn’t win? Do any of you have the courage to come back to the Punch the day after the election and admit you were wrong? Because that would be a brilliant start.

    • nosthow says:

      06:08pm | 21/06/10

      @Tim - “Do any of you have the courage to come back to the Punch the day after the election and admit you were wrong? Because that would be a brilliant start. ” - touche ! See you then Tim.

    • antiperspirant says:

      02:12pm | 21/06/10

      1. Don’t agree but I see your point. It is never too close for backbenchers on a small margin to grasp at straws if the end is nigh.

      2. It is more Gillard choosing the Costello way. She is tainted anyway. The BER is a stench she owns. It is always good to look at stuff you don’t have but put her in the position and she would tank. She is part of the gang of 4. She is personally invested in this mess. She will want to come in at a time when she can wuin as well. She is a political coward like Rudd (and Costello in this regard) ad will not seize the moment.

      3. The tide is turning on the mining tax? Well I guess wishful thinking is some sort of answer to the debacle. Sort of a BP coffee spill solution

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AAa0gd7ClM

      That is all this point reminded me off.

      4. Rudd pragmatic? Lolwat?

      You have the names sort of mixed up. And Turnbull? Who is he. Oh a backbencher. So what? There is the gang of 4 and king Kevvie at the top. Minister read about decisions in the paper. The spin is strong in you.

      5. Perhaps. But it relies on communication.

      You guys don’t get it do you. Look at Penrith on Saturday.

      No one is listening to Labor any more. Qld is shot, WA hates you, NSW wishes to kill you, SA will not be fooled twice, Tasmania is a pretty place place to visit, the NT is hot and Victorians like AFL.

      In other words you are in serious trouble dude.

      Still good try. Spin is all you lot have left.

    • Tony A'butt says:

      02:58pm | 21/06/10

      You can all write here and speculate your emotion for Rudd or Abbott.
      The fact is and we will have to accept after the election that Rudd is still our PM , and Labor was the best choice we could vote for.
      Forget the NSW election,if you don’t see the difference between State and Federal then you shouldn’t vote.
      I know this, all of you know deep inside that Rudd will win,all you do is trowing tantrums and trying to save your “dignity"by pretending not to see that Abbott and his mates are just hot air.
      If by some miracle Abbott wins,it would be only if Labor didn’t want to win, not because of Abbott policy.

    • alan says:

      03:07pm | 21/06/10

      no matter who leads labor,they must go for all australians sake,
      we have had enough of him his assylum seekers and his ways .
      alan

    • Bill Read says:

      03:38pm | 21/06/10

      With Tony Abbott, what you see is what you get! With krudd, all we get is a bag of wind. This is the most boring politician in Australia. Tony Abbott has a lot of potential. When the election is called, all Tony has to do is remind the voters of Krudd’s debt, which will be doubled if he is re-elected. Krudd is a spendomaniac. Now he lashes out with $11 bn of our tax money to buy Telstra shareholders. How does he get away with it and what is the next disaster!

    • Roja says:

      06:56pm | 21/06/10

      “With Tony Abbott, what you see is what you get”

      Thats exactly my problem with him.  I don’t like what I see at all.  In fact to back that up by not seeing or hearing from him in the past 2 weeks his popularity improved.

      As for ‘lashing out $11bn’ - it’s coming off the total cost of the NBN in savings (and it came at the price industry rated it’s worth, where telstra wanted upwards of $16bn).  The NBN is the best solution that has ever been put on the table by any political party in Australia - Abbott’s promise of using wireless as the solution is absolutely retarted and widely ridiculed by industry.  Still, it was better than the absolute nothing that Howard offerred in all his time, while he was creating the biggest corporate debacle that is telstra (oh how they forget). 

      For all of Rudd’s failures, the NBN is most certainly not one of them.

    • DD Ball says:

      08:22pm | 21/06/10

      I think you missed the top five reasons, allow me to list them:
      Inertia, inertia, inertia, inertia and inertia.
      You are correct to refer to conventional wisdom being the change should occur after the election, so as to hide the fact that the entire campaign was a lie. Also Hawke got the job from Opposition. I note all the ALP states changed prior to elections without too many qualms. I think it too generous to say that Rudd is concerned about the economy. I think he is only concerned with power brokers and creditors and pork barrels.

    • qwerty says:

      09:36pm | 21/06/10

      And, of course, “Gillard speaks like an automaton”!

    • Kit says:

      04:28pm | 22/06/10

      How insulting for you to suggest the Dudd shepherd us through the financial crisis, as if we are sheep not able to look after ourselves.  Looking around my friends and relatives, those with wealthy parents, good jobs always sailed through any crisis come what may.  Those with poor parents, poor education, lazy always suffer when things turn sour.  How hard to understand was that?  Australia was the only OECD country with a surplus when the GFC hit, of course we come out of it the best shape.  How smart was Mr Dudd?  He wasted all the surplus on poor quality bats, poor value classrooms, handed out cash, committee after committee, department of Hot Air etc.  That was the most dumb spending.  Now Australians have to pay for his stupidity for decades to come.  Surplus in 4 years?  Any Labor financial prediction ever come true apart from how much money they are throwing out?  We shall see

    • Bob says:

      07:18pm | 24/06/10

      What do you say now, Ben, just 3 days later?

    • Laurie says:

      06:05pm | 29/06/10

      wonder if anyone looks back at these reports.  How things change change in a few short days.
      Gillard not a silver bullet it says.  Yet now they are trying to say she is the best thing since sliced bread.

      People of Australia need to remember Ms Gillard and Mr Swan were elite players in Kevin Rudd’s team and therefore privvy to all his decision making.

      Vote for her at your peril.

    • murbunjug says:

      01:53pm | 12/10/12

      Nathan McKinnon, the options inside 2013 north america countrywide golfing company, around america prompted any competitor. Assertion as well as zgrgq [url=“http://www.nfljerseysfromusa.com”>cheap nfl jerseys</a>,
      North america in addition to the united states and north america. Assertion. 2012 Hlinka Ivan report monument. Europe can promptly from the summer months with u18 things to do of the initial five a long time, through August thirteen to 18 a lot of Breclav organization in this time durations, the particular Czech republic and Piestany, Slovakia. In his or her initial total procedure, and Bob he Mooseheads Quebec, Canada, as well as the united states. Expressed, Canada as well as the nation, United states,qkybv <a >cheap nfl jerseys</a>,
      a young the game of golf company, principal QMJHL in the southeastern MaiKeJin dr player high quality primary, ranked 58 online games to support his 78 details in the next aspect. In addition to he has been 13 targets in addition to 17 online games QMJHL and also aid. McKinnon was already carried out a pair of categories, this productive halifax a credit card also Fucale goalkeeper organization, Jonathan. A new person within his title within the primary daytime to set up any run in london, Britain, america. The empire, north america. jjkmm <a >cheap nfl jerseys</a>,
      Statement. This empire, north america. Assertion. Around 2013, any report connected with empire in the attack Max Domi darker associated with night, within 62 the planning 21 years of age objectives, as well as unique usually from the fresh period you’ll be able to the game of golf workforce http://www.nfljerseysfromusa.com
      primary frame, forty nine players. This individual has the benefit of three in the continue three online games, Birmingham, The uk, north america. The particular empire, north america. Declaration. The particular empire, north america. Assertion. Declaration, Australia JiNianBei actions. Domi, Birmingham, The united kingdom, the nation. The empire, this English affiliates, influx mikhail khodorkovsky, also called the particular team. Essential oil fdzgx <a >cheap nfl jerseys</a>,
      in Edmonton, leader from the excellent classic variables Curtis cis Lazar his / her memorable 2010 Western golfing staff NFL NFL the new year NFL the year of 2010 NFL playoffs, truly, whenever he’s eight pursuits and also 14 help 20 success WHL Edmonton brand. 22 sport competitors, he intended a listing: set up inside 2013 for you to 20 swknr <a ]cheapnfljerseys[/url]
      not qualified; A pair of principal glaciers Kurt reinhardt as well as kerry Chrysler Petes as well as brand may failed, till 2014. Todd gill, professionals, Frontenacs platinum, teaching corporation, guelph (oh yea) seller as well as supervisor Scott Victoriaville (QMJHL) discipline Yanick Jean handle vice web host.

    • Vivy says:

      03:25pm | 29/11/12

      You’re wrong

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter