“Hello ladies.”


Perhaps you remember the viral advertisement where Isaiah Mustafa of the impeccable pecs encouraged women to “look at your man, now back to me, now back at your man, now back to me” and then, accordingly, buy Old Spice so their men could “smell like he’s me.”

The advertisement’s self-aware ribbing of the gulf between the clichéd perfect man and the ordinary guy was cheeky and hilarious, but a sign of the times? With E L James’ adult novel Fifty Shades of Grey still dominating the New York Times bestseller list, I’m starting to wonder. Because though many have marvelled at the runaway success of the erotic novel, its popularity isn’t at all surprising given our collective enthusiasm for romance as a genre - featuring, of course, a male romantic hero against whom men in real life simply cannot compare.

Clearly, romance alone doesn’t explain the astonishing success of Fifty Shades of Grey. There’s also the BDSM-style hijinks between billionaire and control freak Christian Grey and naïve literature student Anastasia Steele.

Their explicit encounters have marked the book as particularly risqué and sent many curious readers thumbing through its pages for a glimpse into boutique sexual thrills that normally drift below the gaze of the mainstream. But when you strip away all the window-dressing kink of the novel - and apparently, the two sequels let up on all that spanking - all that’s left is the familiar romantic fantasy of love that makes a bad man good.

Such romantic fantasy also underwrites Twilight, from which Fifty Shades of Grey sprang to life as a work of fan fiction that re-wrote the chaste relationship between Twilight’s Bella Swan and Edward Cullen before E L James recast the two characters as Ana and Grey. The romantic drama of Twilight kicks into gear with vampire Edward’s obsession with Bella, accompanied by his repeated warnings for her to stay away from him because he might, you know, kill her. Fifty Shades of Grey rehashes this detail with Christian offering similar advice to Ana.

Obviously, such warning is futile: Bella and Ana aren’t put off by the reluctance of these demi-gods - Edward the vampire in Twilight and Christian the billionaire in Fifty Shades of Grey - to get involved with mere mortals. And so embarks the romantic fantasy catnip of both novels: meaningful glances are exchanged, loaded conversations prevail, and the romantic tension builds and builds until Fifty Shades’ Ana and Grey give in to repeated rounds of slap and tickle and a fat diamond gets planted on Bella’s ring finger when she weds Edward in Twilight.

Ana goes on to receive a slew of increasingly extravagant gifts from Christian, and Bella gets to live forever in nuptial bliss as a wealthy, well-dressed vampire. True love, in short, triumphs.

To put it mildly, novels such as Fifty Shades of Grey and its sire Twilight frequently blur the line between romance and the ridiculous. But this is key to their appeal, for they afford women the luxury of rolling their eyes at the farce (and the clunky prose) while frantically flicking over to the next page to find out what happens next. Such novels are a guilty pleasure to read for they are unapologetic about telling a story geared towards women’s romantic needs and desires.

Not that this is a surprise to anyone. Stephanie Meyer admitted openly of the Twilight saga, “I just wanted to write for myself, a fantasy. And that’s what Edward is.” Meanwhile E L James has joked that Fifty Shades of Grey is her “midlife crisis, writ large… All my fantasies, out there.” This female claim to fantasy and the pure enjoyment of it is why, presumably, many fans of the book have described the experience of reading it as ‘liberating’.

And yet it remains a slightly awkward fact that we have little tolerance for fantasies often favoured by men - like porn. There’s good reason for that too, for much porn directed at heterosexual men sexualises male dominance and objectifies women’s bodies.

But romance is its own kind of female porn, and one that peddles a particular fantasy - including the idea that blissful coupledom is the be all and end all and that everyone worth anything ends up ‘happily ever after’. This kind of porn isn’t just a fixture of Mills & Boon novels but also found in Jane Austen’s work, Disney’s fairytales, The Notebook, and romantic comedies since the dawn of the genre.

Even more recent romcoms that appear to challenge the reigning ideal of the committed love relationship by showing us men and women enjoying casual sexual affairs - like No Strings Attached or Friends with Benefits - are love stories in disguise.

Yet romance, unlike conventional porn aimed at men, is often dismissed as harmless fun and enjoys a level of social acceptability of which porn aimed at men can only dream. The term ‘chick flick’ is as derisive as it gets for romance, which is mild by comparison to some of the things that get said about porn.

It seems churlish to take issue with women getting off on romance porn when it is so tame in comparison with that produced with straight men in mind. But while one seems much nicer than the other, the issue with both is not so much what they depict - whether that’s naked bodies having sex, or innocent, tender moments that seem the very antithesis of porn - but the posture they encourage towards the world and others.

Porn for guys and romance porn for women - or even books like Fifty Shades of Grey that drink deep from the wells of both - construe pleasure and fulfilment as on-demand experiences that prioritise individual sexual or romantic needs. Both kinds of porn, then, depict a world where personal desire is paramount and in which other people exist as a means to an end, and not an end in and of themselves. At base, there is not a great deal of difference between the male romantic hero who satisfies the heroine’s every sexual, consumer, romantic, and emotional needs and the female porn star who just lives to please her man sexually and really, really loves having him do that to her.

The vision of the world depicted in both kinds of porn is a far cry from the real stuff of love that requires a whole lot of compromise and for each party to sacrifice their individual needs when it comes to their most intimate relationships. Dare I say - in lieu of the firestorm of late - that for love to last requires men and women both to ‘submit’ to each other? If that’s the case, then it’s ironic that the S&M-inflected Fifty Shades of Grey offers the reverse of this kind of submission because it’s too busy escaping from reality into fantasy where selfish desire runs riot.

Maybe it’s easier for men and women both to seek refuge in fantasy - whether that’s provided by conventional porn or romance porn, its starry-eyed equivalent. But even E L James knows the limits of the make-believe. Maybe women fantasise about someone as mysterious, brooding and handsome as Christian, she concedes, “But I think in real life, it’s very, very different. You want someone who does the dishes.”

Justine Toh is the Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Public Christianity and an Honorary Associate of the Department of Media, Music, and Cultural Studies at Macquarie University.
Comments on this post will close at 8pm.

Most commented

68 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • BJ says:

      07:00am | 10/09/12

      I can live with the hypergamy of Fifty Shades and TV shows like Winners and Losers (the female characters all out weigh their on screen “boyfriends” by quite a bit). It is the power imbalances in much media that I cannot stand. No male character in Home and Away or Neighbours ever wins an argument with a female character.

    • Drama Queen says:

      09:48am | 10/09/12

      The biggest thing I find wrong with your post is that you watch Home and Away and Neighbours.

    • Audra Blue says:

      02:54pm | 10/09/12

      I agree with Drama Queen.  You should be watching Summer Bay Slaughter.  That is worth a lok

    • HowManyShoesDoYouNeed says:

      08:47am | 10/09/12

      “much porn directed at heterosexual men sexualises male dominance and objectifies women’s bodies”

      Yeah, and Twilight like, totally doesn’t because all the women there are bought with money instead. Edward’s garage is overflowing with fancy cars. Even Mills & Boon novels are notorious for being filled with stories of “the rich prince”, “the billionaire”, “the millionaire” all wooing their prey with great big gobs of cash and an aura of importance.

      Notice how not even one of these poor blokes is ever strapped for cash.

      All those novels serve to do is objectify men as the money supply for the girl’s shoe collection.

    • AdamV says:

      08:49am | 10/09/12

      I love that people who write so knowledgeably about “porn” just lump it all into the one big mess where women are men’s playthings. That is one particular genre. There is also gay porn, lesbian porn, porn where women are cruel dominatrixes, couples porn, women-alone porn, men-alone porn…the list is near endless. Check the internet if you want. “Porn” is not all about men treating women with callous disregard. Anybody with a libido or an imagination knows that human sexuality is a hell of a lot more nuanced than that.

      The writer is correct in saying that fantasy is selfish. That’s the whole damn point. Even if you’re fantasising about submission, it’s a submission that belongs to you, and that caters to your particular desire for dominance. But for the love of God - most people, or at least most I know, can TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REALITY AND FANTASY. It’s called being a grown-up.

    • sifi says:

      12:23pm | 10/09/12

      By far and away, MOST porn is geared towards men without doubt. It’s not a matter of being able to tell the difference between reality and fantasy. Fantasy or not, it seeps into our subconscious. The problem is that sooo many men have unrealistic and self-centred expectations of women because of porn. And I think the article is correct in saying the same of women towards men because of this romance fantasy.

    • Inky says:

      12:43pm | 10/09/12

      “The problem is that sooo many men have unrealistic and self-centred expectations of women because of porn”

      I’d say it’s because they’re selfish asshats.

    • M says:

      12:51pm | 10/09/12

      Sifi, that argument could be applied to women and 50 shades you know, about developing unrealistic expectations of men from a book?

    • AdamV says:

      12:57pm | 10/09/12

      Most porn is geared towards men, I agree. But not all porn geared towards men is about men committing borderline rape against women. Sometimes it’s even the other way around. My point is that saying all porn is the same is as stupid as saying all love stories are like Twilight.

      And sure, there are people out there with “unrealistic” expectations of their partners. I’ve heard women say that of boyfriends who want sex three times a week, I’ve heard blokes say it of women who expected oral sex - both of which sound like reasonable demands to me, but which don’t to others. Everybody draws their own lines and the challenge is the same with or without porn’s influence - to make that work within the confines of one’s relationship/s.

      I’d rather have a demanding lover than a starfish!

    • M says:

      01:12pm | 10/09/12

      3 times a week is an unrealistic expectation? Really? I mean christ, You could spread 2 out from monday through to friday and keep optional days on the weekends as the third.

    • Caedrel says:

      02:41pm | 10/09/12

      “The problem is that sooo many men have unrealistic and self-centred expectations of women because of porn”

      I think you’ll also find that men have unrealistic expectations of themselves because of porn. It gives us unrealistic ideas about how big we should be, how long we should last, how capable we should be of satisfying our partner. It applies pressure on us to “perform”, and affects our expectations of ourselves.

    • M says:

      09:04am | 10/09/12

      “And yet it remains a slightly awkward fact that we have little tolerance for fantasies often favoured by men - like porn. There’s good reason for that too, for much porn directed at heterosexual men sexualises male dominance and objectifies women’s bodies. “

      Could it be that this is what men fantasise about? You know, seeing as we’re visual creatures and all? I think it’s a slightly awkward fact that it is feminism which seeks to demonize men for their sexualities and which seeks to perpetuate cultural intolerance for the medium through which men seek sexual outlet.

    • Nathan Explosion says:

      09:09am | 10/09/12

      Ugh, I wish people would stop buying and reading that crap.

      Not only is it terribly written, it is not at all a healthy representation of a BDSM relationship.

      As a friend of mine said, “This offends me as a librarian and a pervert”.

    • Audra Blue says:

      03:03pm | 10/09/12

      I read all three 50 Shades book and I found them to be wildly entertaining.  They didn’t spur me on to find a millionaire to marry, or indulge in a BDSM relationship.  I didn’t identify with any of the characters and I didn’t feel inadequate about my own life after reading them.  I just found the story to be interesting, the sex/bondage informative and it gave me an escape from my normal reading list for a couple of weeks.

      Sure there are some novels that inspire and change your life and I’ve read a few of those, but they have nothing to do with this hardcore Mills and Boon genre. 

      If you can’t distinguish between real life and fantasy, your problems go way deeper than a few fiction books

    • Anonymous says:

      09:11am | 10/09/12

      Don’t women always complain about men always wanting sex? Why is 50 Shades so popular then? Is it because Christian Grey is rich?

    • M says:

      09:35am | 10/09/12

      We should start complaining about women never wanting sex.

    • Drama Queen says:

      09:46am | 10/09/12

      I doubt very much that its about Christian Grey being rich (in case you haven’t realised he’s only a character in a book and not a real person - chip on shoulder) - it’s more the fact that what women get at home is boring. Most men don’t really know how to satisfy a women and they’re having to look elsewhere for something other than cheating.

    • Anonymous says:

      10:10am | 10/09/12

      Don’t kid yourself, Drama Queen. You don’t have to be a billionaire to be good in bed. (I’m an excellent example). So is it the money and private jets that you find attractive and therefore a catalyst for “satisfaction”?

    • M says:

      10:37am | 10/09/12

      It’s the dominance they find attractive. The billionaire thing plays second fiddle to being dominated by a man who knows what he’s doing.

    • Drama Queen says:

      11:27am | 10/09/12

      “You don’t have to be a billionaire to be good in bed. (I’m an excellent example).”

      What are you going on about Anonymous - THE BILLIONAIRE BOOK CHARACTER IS NOT REAL. Even the BDSM scenario isn’t based in reality (I found the book completely boring based on this fact).

      “So is it the money and private jets that you find attractive and therefore a catalyst for “satisfaction”?” ANON - THE GUY IS NOT REAL.

      “(I’m an excellent example)” - if you need to affirm it by stating it to everyone that you are then I have my doubts.

    • M says:

      12:02pm | 10/09/12

      The girls in porn aren’t real either. I’m yet to find a woman who happily accomodates the big three in the same session.

    • Anonymous says:

      12:10pm | 10/09/12

      The book is not real, but there are many impressionable women who are drawn to the male lead because they’ve been deluded into thinking that this is a perfect man. Handsome, rich and possessive. I was questioning why 50 shades was popular, since Mr. Grey’s depraved sexual nature seems to be a direct contradiction of what women in real life SAY they want. Do you seriously think that 50 Shades would be just as popular if he wasn’t rich and was some average income earner?

    • Tigger says:

      12:28pm | 10/09/12

      @Anonymous

      What Drama Queen is saying is that in order for women to really desire you and want to have lots of sex with you, you have to be NOT REAL.

      @M

      Acutally it their wealth and power that allows them to dominate in the first place. As someone posted below, if Grey was a poor schmo his “dominance” would be rejected outright.

    • Inky says:

      12:42pm | 10/09/12

      “What Drama Queen is saying is that in order for women to really desire you and want to have lots of sex with you, you have to be NOT REAL.”

      Always worked for me

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:57pm | 10/09/12

      Yes, and I’m sure all these bored housewives are nubile contortionist gymnasts with an encyclopaedic knowledge of the Kama Sutra…

      The popularity of this book is that it speaks right to the fantasies of women and what they desire.  It did not create them. It just highlights what is already there. It shows how unrealistic women are when it comes to relationships and when they blame men for their actions in the breakdown of a marriage it fails to highlight their own unrealistic standards and expectations that no man would be able to live up to or be willing to aim for as the ROI far exceeds the effort.

    • M says:

      01:09pm | 10/09/12

      I believe ROMCOMS have done irreperable damage to western women.

    • Drama Queen says:

      01:51pm | 10/09/12

      Tubesteak - Really? “Unrealistic standard and expectations”? I found the book completely boring. There was nothing new that a normal sex-life doesn’t include. You don’t need to be nubile contortionist gymnast with an encyclopaedic knowledge of the Kama Sutra to have good sex. You do need a capable partner though, or three, or four .... I don’t know how good sex has suddenly become an unrealistic standard and expectation.

      Anon - “depraved sexual nature” - now I know that you haven’t had alot of experience outside the confines of normal. How is BDSM depraved?

      Tiggar - read my posts and comprehend. I’m trying to get Anon to understand the character isn’t real. He doesn’t seem to know.

    • Anonymous says:

      02:11pm | 10/09/12

      I’ve stated that I understand well enough the character isn’t real, Queenie. Don’t deliberately twist my words. Many women have the image that this guy is the perfect man, real or not. THAT is my issue.

      Also, I’m into light BDSM for the record, but that’s not what I’‘d call depraved. What IS depraved is having a woman sign a contract that grants you complete control her life, in and out of the bedroom. It’s the mark of a possessive, controlling, sociopathic creep.

    • Tubesteak says:

      02:14pm | 10/09/12

      There is no way in hell I’m going to read the book to get the details about the sex.

      The unrealistic standards I was referring to are about the drama and excitement of the relationship. Relationships are meant to become staid and boring. That’s what happens when two people stay together for so long. It’s the same with jobs. They start out exciting and new but after a while you realise you’re doing the same boring thing every day all for a paycheque.

      The problem we have these days is women keep expecting a man to keep things vital, fresh and exciting. Rarely does the woman add anything into the mix other than her shopping list of expectations. They expect the man to hang off her every word and treat it as the most important fascinating thing in his life even though it has nothing to do with football, finance or cars. Then he’s expected to come up with new and exciting activities to keep the woman entertained. This is unrealistic and impossible. No wonder a man stops trying to please the woman. It’s like having to constantly jump through hoops just for the sake of it. After a while you get sick and tired of performing like a dog and just walk away and go to sleep.

      People that complain about their partners being poor in bed are saying a lot about themselves. None of it is good. They are implying that they lie there and expect the other person to do all the work. Nothing stopping you from getting on top and working the angles to your satisfaction. That’s how to have a good time in bed.

    • M says:

      02:22pm | 10/09/12

      @ Anon, interesting when you put marriage like that.

    • Audra Blue says:

      03:06pm | 10/09/12

      My complaint has always been that men don’t want sex as much as I do.

      I REALLY need to start dating a better class of guy!

    • Drama Queen says:

      03:18pm | 10/09/12

      “What IS depraved is having a woman sign a contract that grants you complete control her life, in and out of the bedroom. It’s the mark of a possessive, controlling, sociopathic creep”

      Again Anon - it’s a fictional book - a real woman didn’t really sign a real contract. It was all make-believe for the book. The book is about fantasy. Rarely do people want to read a book about what goes on in their daily lives and rarely does fantasy creep into daily lives.

      “People that complain about their partners being poor in bed are saying a lot about themselves. None of it is good. They are implying that they lie there and expect the other person to do all the work. Nothing stopping you from getting on top and working the angles to your satisfaction. That’s how to have a good time in bed.”

      No Tubesteak - its shows just how things go over your head, literally and the limitations you place on sex if you think girl on top is the be-all and end-all to good sex. Women can tell the difference between a good and bad root - sitting on top doesn’t make a difference to a dud root. And you should try dating other women if the one’s your choosing don’t do it for you - it’s just like when men expect you to be at their beck-and-call, like you don’t have anything else in your life except them.

      “That’s how to have a good time in bed.” - with only one person - M you’re such an amateur.

    • TheHuntress says:

      03:34pm | 10/09/12

      @ Audra Blue.

      Right on, sister. I’m yet to meet a man who wants sex as much as I do. And now Mr. Huntress has totally lost interest…even in all my new kits from Coco De Mer and that makes me sad. At least I have awesome underwear.

    • M says:

      03:56pm | 10/09/12

      You girls with high sex drive need some form of easy identification. Ideally i’d like to marry someone with as high a sex drive as me.

    • Tigger says:

      04:25pm | 10/09/12

      @Drama Queen

      So what’s your point? First you claimed that the real sex women get is boring so they need to escape into a book. Then you claimed the character isn’t real and the BDSM isn’t based in reality. Then you claimed that the book is actually boring. Then you claimed it was all make-believe and women don’t really want that in their real lives either. Then you claimed that we don’t know what good sex is, yet failed to actually educate us. So this all begs the question - do you even know what you want or why you want to read about it, other than to feel sorry for yourself?

    • Tubesteak says:

      04:55pm | 10/09/12

      “Women can tell the difference between a good and bad root - sitting on top doesn’t make a difference to a dud root.”

      Obviously, you don’t know the difference if you don’t know how to make it good when you are on top. People that complain about others being a dud root don’t know how to have sex and don’t know how to use it.

      “And you should try dating other women if the one’s your choosing don’t do it for you”

      *you’re
      I know how to use a woman to do it for me because I know what I’m doing and how to get me off. Because I’m not a dud root wink

    • Drama Queen says:

      05:12pm | 10/09/12

      Tubesteak - wtf - “People that complain about others being a dud root don’t know how to have sex and don’t know how to use it.”

      Men who don’t go for long and men who don’t know where all the bits are - there are alot of them out there - ask any girl. Again limiting good sex to girl-on-top ??? You seem to be taking my posts personally, defending loudly and affirming yourself wildly, more than the other guys have on this thread - I think that says alot about you.

      And haven’t you ever heard of women faking it -

    • Audra Blue says:

      05:26pm | 10/09/12

      “You girls with high sex drive need some form of easy identification. Ideally i’d like to marry someone with as high a sex drive as me.”

      M, usually when I tell a prospective partner I like sex A LOT and I’m happiest when I’m getting it every day, the guy’s eyes light up and he thinks “wow, that’s awesome”. 

      Then reality hits when he realises I’m telling the truth and he ends up getting intimidated and freaks out and thinks I have psychological problems.  I think it’s just that men are so conditioned to have to “work” to get sex that when it comes easily, they don’t know what to do.

      As I said, I really have to start dating a better class of guy.

    • TheHuntress says:

      05:46pm | 10/09/12

      So true, Audra Blue…

      Always had the same problem - the initial, “OMG this is awesome!”, to “some other time” to “There must be something wrong with you”.

      Now when people joke about women never giving it up for their husbands I just roll my eyes and ask Mr. Huntress for his opinion. Pierre Louys had it so right in “The Young Girls Handbook of Good Manners” when he said ‘never ask a married woman if she had a good f*** last night. Chances are she will have little to say.”. And it’s not for my lack of trying.

    • Asrael Goldwing says:

      09:25am | 10/09/12

      I have cancer. My prognosis was 5 years-2 years ago. My first hubby of whom I am still quite fond, fathered my first 3 daughters but never had to take any responsibility for the household. That’s the advantage of being a field soldier. You’re never home so wifey just cops the lot and when they are home, they’re just in the way! Not romantic at all.

      My current husband was the kind of guy who floated through life moving from romance to romance and when real life got in the way, he’d move on. Then he met me.

      Now he is stuck with me dying of cancer and a daughter who is only 12. He finds it hard to keep going (as I do) some days. But he does. He works, he looks after me, he gardens and builds and cleans and just keeps us going. That’s love. That’s the most romantic relationship, ever!

    • TChong says:

      11:56am | 10/09/12

      AG
      Good luck , and best wishes to you and family.
      Agree with your closing lines- thats what a decent relationship should be about - caring.

    • TChong says:

      11:57am | 10/09/12

      AG
      Good luck , and best wishes to you and family.
      Agree with your closing lines- thats what a decent relationship should be about - caring.

    • Chris L says:

      09:28am | 10/09/12

      Thank you Justine! I couldn’t express how frustrating it is to read and hear judgement and derision from women toward men regarding our sexuality, only to have those same women celebrate female sexuality.

      It is somewhat cathartic to hear from a woman who recognises that the female perspective is not the only acceptable perspective.

    • Anonymous says:

      09:52am | 10/09/12

      If 50 Shades’ male lead wasn’t a handsome looking billionaire who showered the female in gifts, and was instead an average-looking tradie in slight financial difficulty, 50 Shades would be billed as a story about a despicable sociopath rapist who made his girlfriend endure his routine physical and psychological abuse.

    • M says:

      10:17am | 10/09/12

      It would still bring in millions.

    • Ally says:

      10:17am | 10/09/12

      True. I read it to see what the fuss was about and couldn’t believe what I read. Not only was it poorly written, the so called “hero” was a sociopath. Mind you, I felt the same about Twilight.

    • Chris L says:

      10:37am | 10/09/12

      That may be what attracts readers. Robert Englund used to get mail from female fans saying they fantasise about being raped by Freddy. I suspect many women, if they’re honest with themselves, enjoy fantasising about being dominated even if they wouldn’t agree to such a thing in real life.

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:11pm | 10/09/12

      Whie Ted Bundy was on death row after having been convicted of raping and killing 28 young women, he received an average of 1,000 love letters per day from women wanting to be with him. Some would pay the guards to look the other way when they visited.

      That is demented.

    • M says:

      12:45pm | 10/09/12

      That is hypergamy.

    • NN says:

      05:22pm | 10/09/12

      So… it’s fine for men for fantasize about women with big tits who love anal sexd, but if women fantasize about a rich, handsome man, they are somehow bitches with unrealistic expectations?

    • Chris L says:

      06:21pm | 10/09/12

      @NN - How did you draw that conclusion?

    • Ally says:

      10:36am | 10/09/12

      I think the crazy sales are, in part, due to people buying a copy of the first to see what all the fuss is about. I read somewhere that the take up rates for the second book is somewhere around the 50 per cent mark, with even less for the third. Still phenomenal when you’re talking of sales in the millions, but if the story was engaging or the writing quality you would expect a better sales rate for the sequels.

      Also, I find it really disturbing that anyone would categorise this book, or Twilight, as romance. Sure, women’s romantic fiction is generally populated by commanding and powerful men, but Grey and Edward are nuts. They’re controlling, stalking, jealous psychos that attatch themselves to these plain mousey women and start molding them in to what they want. The female leads are pathetic, with no personality and no sense of self worth outside of their boyfriends. If a friend of mine ever said she wanted a boyfriend just like Edward or Grey, I would be seriously disturbed.

    • M says:

      11:08am | 10/09/12

      For all the gnashing of teeth and wailing that goes on about Christian/Edward, I see plenty of women falling over themselves to be with men just like that in real life.

    • Beth says:

      11:23am | 10/09/12

      Thank you Ally, I thought I was the only female that felt that way. I have read both series and found the female to be an annoying, weak sook and the males chauvanistic mysoginists. Both were also extremely badly written. I only read them to see what all the fuss was about and borrowed them from a friend.

      I think the rise of the books is more to do with Gen x/y being too cool to read Mills and Boon and therefore not realising there are books with sex in it aimed at women. They would be better off reading good books and looking up Literotica when they want to read about sex.

    • Markus says:

      12:37pm | 10/09/12

      I’ve witnessed this incredible phenomenon where there is not a single woman who actually thinks that Twilight or Shades are anything other than poorly written crap, yet they have still managed to read every single novel and watch every movie.
      Just to see what the fuss is/to confirm how bad they really are, of course.

      @Beth, case in point.
      “I only read them to see what all the fuss was about and borrowed them from a friend.”
      These cigarettes aren’t mine either, I’m just holding them for a friend. Honest.

    • Audra Blue says:

      05:48pm | 10/09/12

      I enjoyed both series of books for what they actually are - entertainment.  I wouldn’t like a boyfriend like either Edward or Christian.  If I had to choose, give me Jacob - alive, passionate, warm, strong and protective. 

      I also found the female leads to be sooky and annoying.  I really started liking Bella after she became a vampire - at least her whining stopped.  But I’m not a teenaged girl any more so it could be that I just couldn’t identify with her.

      As for Ana Steele, I don’t understand why strong dominant male characters are supposed to fall for klutzy, socially awkward female characters?  The first time Christian Grey met Anastacia Steele, she fell face first through his office doorway when he opened the door.!

      But I guess it plays into the romantic genre fantasy of a helpless female being rescued by the dominant male.  If these stereotypes weren’t ingrained into us, we wouldn’t find them so compelling and readable.

      And to save myself the cost of the books, I bought the Kindle versions.

    • Ally says:

      07:24pm | 10/09/12

      Audra - I read a lot of trashy books, particularly romance or chick lit, because I like something frothy and predictable and because I don’t always want to read something that requires a lot of concentration or leaves me thinking about the content for ages.

      That said, there are trashy books and then there’s straight out trash. I lump Twilight and 50 Shades in this second category. For a start they’re poorly written but the underlying themes are disgraceful, particularly in Twilight when the core audience seems to be teenage girls. I’d like to think women can see this for themselves, but teenagers generally can’t and I find it really troublesome that they’re holding these deeply flawed “heroes” up as an ideal for future boyfriends/husbands. Or that they see Bella or the 50 shades girl as women they would want to be like.

      Yeah, it’s just a book and it’s all made up. But books are influential, particularly to teenagers and if they’re going to read Twilight I’d hope that some adult who knows better would take the trouble to explain to them why the books are such crap and steer them towards something better.

    • Audra Blue says:

      07:51pm | 10/09/12

      You’re right Ally.  I forgot how impressionable I was when I was a teenager.  I was addicted to Mills and Boon and Harlequin romances and for many years I tried to find a man who was the basic template guy - strong, masculine, silent, suffering and emotionally flawed but one who I could “fix” with love *sigh*.

      But these new “role models” are way worse. I mean, a vampire?  He’s not even a real person.  And the guy with the emotional problems who solves them through kinky sex?  Talk about upping the romantic ante!

    • Inky says:

      11:29am | 10/09/12

      It was interesting to see someone make the comparison. But you had me at “Hello Ladies”

    • TheHuntress says:

      01:01pm | 10/09/12

      Why oh why are people still reading this? I don’t understand how people can read “50 Shades of Grey” (I’ve only read exerpts, couldn’t do it to myself) when there are far better books out there. “Delta of Venus”, “Story of O”, “Emmanuelle” or “The Sexual Life of Catherine M.”. Erotic literature is a beautiful thing when done well and is not all about impossibly handsome, rich men and pretty, vulnerable girls.

      Time for modern ‘erotica’ to grow up. Perhaps take some lessons from translated works written earlier last century. Modern day ‘explicitness’ just doesn’t cut it.

    • Nathan Explosion says:

      01:25pm | 10/09/12

      The Missus read a bit of it, then threw it down and yelled, “I can get better porn online written by virgins!”

      Then she went back to her tumblr.

    • Markus says:

      02:13pm | 10/09/12

      You’d think virgins would write the best porn.
      The absence of actually getting any themselves would give them ample time to think, read and write in detail about it.

    • Slothy says:

      02:50pm | 10/09/12

      I actually know a 30 year old virgin who writes porn that is scorching hot, and a much better read than that literary abortion masquerading as a novel. Hell, I unambiguously hate anything I’ve written that’s more than about an hour old and yet I can still happily say that my own tentative forays into erotica are infinitely more arousing than a character talking about her ‘inner goddess’.

    • TheHuntress says:

      03:30pm | 10/09/12

      LOL I think I would just switch off if I read about someone being in touch with their “inner goddess”.

      I quite liked the approach of “The Sexual Life of Catherine M”. While I wouldn’t classify it as erotica, rather an autobiographical account of her sex life, I liked that there was no real emotion or morality attached to her actions and pleasure, just raw honesty. I would love to see what she would write about “inner goddesses” though, just for a laugh. wink

    • sami says:

      02:04pm | 10/09/12

      The similarities between 50 shades and twilight are because 50 shades was twilight fanfiction. They changed the names, published it and people went nuts. Moving on.

      My friend was going on about it and lent me the books, but after taking weeks to even get that far, I finally stopped reading halfway into the first book. It is utter garbage and easily the worst book I’ve ever read. If you can get past the shit writing I don’t know how you can get past the shit characters. Anastasias bloody ‘inner goddess’ harping on all the time and christians complaints about her biting her lip and not eating her food just give me the shits. If a guy tried to boss me around that much I’d tell him to jog on. I don’t see how it’s ‘romantic’ but I guess we all have our desires. Personally I think my boyfriend was romantic when he went on a servo run to get me panadol and a paddlepop one night. And I reckon if anyone was really that keen on bdsm they should be reading/participating in the real stuff, not this tripe.

      The success of it is just due to all the sheep jumping on the bandwagon… the problem will be solved when people learn to think for themselves and not just like stuff for the sake of liking it. It’s a big part of society these days, all these notions of romance and old fashioned traditions, like taking husbands last name when you get married. Far out. I know I’m not the only woman that can’t get on board with this stuff but I sure am in the minority.

      PS- the worst thing about this are the baby outfits I’ve seen that say ‘im here cos my mummy read 50 shades of grey’ or something- wtf?!

      End of incoherent rant.

    • Meh says:

      02:19pm | 10/09/12

      If you can tell the difference between fantasy and reality then there is absolutely nothing wrong with being immersed in the 50 shades / twilight / Mills & Boom, just as there is nothing wrong with people looking at naked people. Whatever rocks your boat.

      Your fantasy world is your own, you have full control of what happens, what you want to share and what you want to keep to yourself. That is not being selfish, expecting your partner to live 100% of their lives as part of yours demanding every shred of romantic or intimate thought be given over, that is selfish.

      There are fantasies that many people only want to keep to themselves as often when you try to make fantasy a reality, it is impossible for the real world to live up to it.

      Now back to my day-dream of Katy Perry doing a private gymnastics display on my lear-jet.

    • just shut up says:

      04:33pm | 10/09/12

      Smell ?
      USA and NSW are both ruled by B.O.

    • just shut up says:

      04:35pm | 10/09/12

      USA has 50 shades !or is that states?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter