The Independent Sport Panel has just reported to Sports Minister Kate Ellis after a year-long look at our national pastime. Aside from some recommendations about restructuring and administration, it had two key questions that go straight to the heart of our sporting spirit - what’s the definition of success and which sports are important?

Cheering on losers might take on new urgency. Remember Eric the Eel at Sydney 2000?

Panel chair David Crawford said we might need to kiss goodbye our ambitions to a top five Olympic ranking. “The Panel strongly believes the public needs to be educated to think differently about what constitutes Olympic success,” the report overview says.

He also listed the sports the Panel defined as carrying the “national ethos.” They were Swimming, tennis, cricket, cycling, the football codes, netball, golf, hockey, basketball, surfing and surf lifesaving. “If more money is to be injected into the system then we must give serious consideration to where that money is spent.”

The guts of the report makes some interesting observations about our sporting priorities to now.

The bias towards funding Olympic sports leads to outcomes that make little strategic sense for Australia. For example, more government funds are provided for archery than cricket which has more than 100 times the number of participants, according to unpublished ASC data. Water polo receives as much high performance and Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) funding as golf, tennis and lawn bowls combined - even though these sports can right claim to be ‘whole of lifetime’ sports and significant contributors to the Australian Government’s preventative health agenda.

Australia’s medal ranking in Beijing was sixth - a very creditable result and our third best performance in 30 years. This resulted in 14 gold medals and 46 medals in total and whichever way the maths is done, the result is very expensive. The ASC’s funding to Olympic sports for their elite programs runs at over $60 million per year and this does not include state and territory funding or Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) contributions. Over four year cycles, it is easy to derive figures in the order of $15 million per gold medal or $4 million per medal.

It is also vital that Australia’s medal targets are realistic ... The relevant NSOs and AOC and the Australian Paralympic Committee (APC) have put together a case for an additional $109 million per year on average on the basis that this is required to sustain Australia as a ‘Top Five’ medal count nation.

Are they right? Is medal count relevant? In an Olympic down-year such as this cool heads on our shoulders might say “sure, medal counts don’t matter.” But would we give the same answer in 2012 when where having our backsides whooped by Canada, or the Netherlands?

Here’s potentially the most tricky part of what the Panel is proposing.

The Panel recommends some general parameters for these targets. We should aspire to and be proud of, say, ‘Top Eight’ results for some chosen sports and the Olympics and have higher aspirations in others.

In examining the definition of success the Panel also looked at which sports are really important.

There should be a debate about which sports carry the national ethos. Swimming, tennis, cricket, cycling, the football codes, netball, golf, hockey, basketball, surfing and surf lifesaving are among the most popular sports in Australia, a part of the national psyche. Many are team sports and are the sports we are introduced to as part of our earliest education and community involvement.

Now there’s a debate that could go on for years.

For now, two questions:

A - do we need to lower our sights and put up with less Olympic medals?

B - which sports are most important to our ongoing national self-esteem?

As an aside, the Panel did not recommend the introduction of a HECS-style scheme for graduates of the Australian Institute of Sport, which was canvassed here on The Punch by Sports Minister Kate Ellis in June.

The Minister said the Government would respond to the recommendations in the new year.

Most commented

15 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • John A Neve says:

      12:40pm | 17/11/09

      The Olympic games has been destroyed by money.

      To restore the Olympics, the games should be returned to individual sports, teams sports should be excluded.

    • Samuel says:

      01:10pm | 17/11/09

      The Olympics are a waste of money. The taxpayers’ money going to the AOC and others should be returned to the taxpayer.

    • T.Chong says:

      03:20pm | 17/11/09

      Listening to John Coates on ABC whinging, then the report, and its recommendations must be a good thing.
      Coates et al with the “medals at any price mentality”  is the very thing that has turned the olympics into a circus.
      Very little difference between “Sports people are our saviors” and Zoolanders take on beautiful people as role models. The only difference was Zoolander was parody, while Coates and pals seem serios.

    • alteria says:

      03:40pm | 17/11/09

      Community fitness is where it needs to be at. Sportsgrounds, ball courts and pools, sure. But let’s not forget bike tracks, walking tracks, pedestrian and cycle links that don’t depend on brief windows in motor traffic to get through.

    • SM says:

      03:59pm | 17/11/09

      Outside of when the Olympics or the Commonwealth games are on, very few people give two hoots about swimming.  And the sports of cycling and hockey are part of our “national ethos”? 

      Good lord

    • Jim Fletcher says:

      04:13pm | 17/11/09

      If any sport is that important to our ongoing national self esteem, then we, the general public, are the one’s with a problem.
      For crying out loud it’s supposed to be sport. I don’t think I’m an orphan for sometimes barracking for poor souls who do’nt have scientists analysing their breathing technique, psychiatrists analysing their mental state, controled indoor climates to match the climate of the host nation, etc.
      All most of the poor sods from countries who can’t fund their top sportspeople with obscene amounts of money, is guts, dedication, and talent.
      We need to seriously look at ourselves if all we are interested in is gold, gold, gold.

    • Scott says:

      04:27pm | 17/11/09

      I do think the money given to athletes is ridiculous and always have. I have also questioned why it isn’t like HECS in that athletes who go on to win big money or gain sponsorship deals worth millions should have to pay the money back, like students do.
      The obvious answer, of course, is for our government to pay for the development of untraceable steroids and such and just hand them out to everybody.

    • James Bannerman says:

      04:44pm | 17/11/09

      The report is brilliant. The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the Australian public we are a some sort of sporting master race based on Olympic performance. Whilst spending obscene amounts of money to soothe our inferiority complex, we point fingers at the Poms and the Chinese for “spending stupid money” and then curl up in a balls adopt a child’s voice and say “but we are only a little nation”.

      I loathe the entire charade. Based on national GDP if other more intelligent nations who have a greater interest in arts, culture and innovation decided to spend per capita what we spend we would be about 16th at best. The fact we have even been top ten is a national disgrace. Our treatment of the first Australians a global humiliation but hey, we have a truck load of medals! Look how big my toys are!!! We need to wake up.

      What I could never understand is the sheer size of our Olympic team. At Beijing our team was 130 athletes larger than GB and how far did that act of desperation get us?

      If that doesn’t tell you we have lost the plot, nothing will.

    • paulm says:

      05:00pm | 17/11/09

      This article reminds me of the hi-tech swimming suits, where, if you didn’t come from a wealthy country and couldn’t afford one then you were at a large disadvantage.  In general the Olympics and sport have become hi-tech and hi-cost.  More about bio-scientists and engineers than an athletes abilities or skills.  The Olympics are still an awesome event that unifies the world for a while, but sadly they have become another big business.

    • Daniel says:

      07:09pm | 17/11/09

      I think this report is long overdue. Im sick of seeing sport on every channel every weekend. Its ok to have sport and to have funding for certain things but the level of funding by the government was always too high for what we got back. I dont know why people are carrying on about this myself. This is the capitalist economic system at work. This is economic rationalism at work it happens when companies cant afford employees they cut them and get rid of them. Why are people jumping up and down? If you accept the capitalist market system you cant argue against this decision. I say bring it on.

    • RT says:

      08:37pm | 17/11/09

      There is something distasteful about the sight of nations buying olympic success. It seems to be the former/current communist countries, the US and Australia that do it most. Why is that? Are we trying to make up for some deficiency in our national character by insisting on being one of the top 5 in the medal tally at the olympics whatever it costs?

    • stephen says:

      09:16pm | 17/11/09

      No money for Olympic Sport Ms Maguire ? No ? Not the Australian Chamber Orchestra then ? Then who ?

    • Mike says:

      09:53pm | 17/11/09

      James needs to wake up and see the real stats. In 2002 (when the last system-wide stats were collected), the Governments of Australia spent $1 billion on culture and the arts. $1 billion…

      In comparison, sport got $100 million.

      It is the greatest myth ever that arts gets more than sport. The fact is, that the arts receives a massive amount of money - an absolute massive amount.

      From my point of view - I like to watch a bit of sport. And for $15 million per Olympic gold - that’s less than $1 each every four years for every Australian - well, I think that is a pretty good deal…

      Did you know that the Australian Government spends more money on military bands than it spends on the Australian Hockey Team? Now which is more important for national price??????

    • Richard says:

      10:54pm | 17/11/09

      Gosh, this report has really brought the pompous, self-righteous, holier than thou preachers out of the woodwork!  The fact is that most Australians don’t agree with these people.  Most Australians love sport and want to see Australians winning internationally.  It is part of our national ethos.  It is and always has been one of the things which define us to ourselves and the world.  Australians simply won’t put up with us falling behind in our Olympic performance.  Quite apart from anything else, who could put up with those gloating Poms!  Look at the history.  In 1976 (I think it was), we won a single bronze medal in Montreal.  The national outcry was so great that the government established the AIS.  The public would never countenance going backwards again.  To those above who are so contemptuous of what most of their countrymen love, please just watch something else and don’t bother us while we revel in sport.

    • Carl Palmer says:

      09:49am | 18/11/09

      Q A –
      A coach speaking to his elite athlete at the Olympics just before her 400m event

      “Cathy you have worked extremely hard over many many years and sacrificed everything and you deserve every success but hey if you come eighth that will be an excellent result”. That’s what the report seems to suggest. Lots of eighth places with a very low probability or possibly no chance of achieving a first place. If that is the case then let’s pull out of the Olympics and redirect the funds to somewhere else.

      Yes it is a lot of money but if they want to do the maths then based on the $60mil PA that represents about $2.73 PA for each person.

      The report seems to suggest therefore that sports such as athletics would not be funded or have their funds reduced maybe severely?  That means that a one Cathy Freeman would probably not have won a gold medal. A proud aboriginal in front of her proud country celebrating and rejoicing in her achievement. Was I happy to part with my $2.73 – yep.  What impact did that have on the indigenous community? What impact did Tiger Woods have in promoting golf in Australia?

      Q B –
      To suggest that the football codes be included in the handouts is sheer lunacy. I’m an avid AFL supporter and believe that these funds should not be directed to for example the football codes.  They fund themselves thru TV rights etc etc. Does that mean that sports that do not attract attention and therefore obtain revenue streams via TV rights be ignored? Surely our goal must be to give every Australian the opportunity to succeed in their chosen field. If an individual displays an exceptional skill in a given discipline then we should support and encourage those individual(s). Does that mean that we do not support or fund gymnastics, skiing, athletics, boxing, weightlifting, shooting and rowing to name just a few?? If we don’t fund these sports how will we ever discover an individual’s – our children’s potential?

      Yes it is a lot of money and yes it does need to be managed wisely. I believe that we should not only focus on a handful of sports because as our governments keep telling us, we are a multicultural society with a rich tapestry of many cultures. If that is the case therefore – which it is, then that would suggest that we now have a broader and wider appreciation for a variety of sports which is reflected in many other aspects of our society and that should be funded and supported.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@TheStalwart an analyst in Sydney said it was a "sad day" http://t.co/vh4Yu4OgDD. I think he was just exhausted and gave up analyzing

ToryShepherd

@CatherineDeveny @sydwritersfest A wobble

Paul Colgan

RT @NASA: Amazing views from the International Space Station of Pavlof Volcano erupting in Alaska. http://t.co/vqBkkiOful

Paul Colgan

US Google Doodle features a girl's touching depiction of her father's return from Iraq http://t.co/4LiRFOntTY

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter