I don’t usually write about myself, because I’m interested in issues rather than personalities. Some commenters - not speaking of you, James - frequently try to derail conversations by launching personal attacks, and the best response is to ignore these and concentrate on the topic at hand.

Inside the mind of Erick

In this case, however, I can make an exception because the topic is me. It’s good to be recognised, even in a tongue-in-cheek way. Not just because it amuses me or inflates my ego, but because it means my message is being heard.

Of course, I don’t expect James to suddenly renounce the errors of his ways and become a born-again conservative, but then that isn’t my purpose.

Fifty years ago Solomon Asch carried out a series of psychological experiments on the topic of group conformity.

In brief, he found that if all members of a group, bar one, agreed on something, then the last member of the group would also believe it - even against the plainly visible evidence.

On a larger scale, we can see the dominant media and ideologies of our society as agents of this kind of conformity.

An interesting discovery in the Asch experiments was the effect of the lone dissenting voice.

Even if only one other person stated the truth, the last person became much harder to convince. And that’s why it’s important to have a dissenting voice; it helps prevent the stifling unanimity that leads to so many bad results for a society.

With my own background as a left-wing activist, I’ve been familiar with ideologies such as identity politics, multiculturalism, feminism and the rest for many years. I know them inside and out, and I know where their blind spots lead to harmful groupthink.

I also know how to strike a nerve, so to speak, and briefly expose the cognitive dissonance behind so much of ‘progressive’ thought. The reactions I get to even one or two sentences show me when I’m on target.

So, there you have it, my Evil Plan. Well, not quite all of it - but then, what fun would it be to know all the answers in advance?

233 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • AFR says:

      12:00pm | 08/04/11

      Punch: you must be freaking kidding me.

    • Mahhrat says:

      12:56pm | 08/04/11

      Dear Gok, you people astonish me.

      Erick’s a conservative, I am not, but kudos to him for being a part of every discussion.  Perhaps he’s a troll who’s 42 with carpal tunnel who keeps this on PC 2 while he’s multiboxing WoW (though I doubt it), but he’s consistent and not unfunny to read.

      You lot all take yourselves far too seriously.  Punch would be a sadder place without Erick, and while I think they’ve set a dangerous precedent by posting both articles, I don’t mind that they’ve done it.

      After all, you can just not read, eh?

    • Tombowler says:

      12:58pm | 08/04/11

      I’m confused:

      Is Erick real? Is he a “Punch” invention to stir the pot? Is that how he always gets 1st comment?

      What the f#ck is going on?

      It’s some sort of international womens conspiracy I reckon!

    • Freeman says:

      01:40pm | 08/04/11

      I was just dissapointed that Erick was not the first to respond to this article.

    • AFR says:

      02:19pm | 08/04/11

      I’m cool with Erick’s conservative leanings, but sorry, I DO have a problem with his woman-hating. I’d like to think that is not typical of all conservatives.

    • Tom says:

      02:26pm | 08/04/11

      I am pleased that Erick has written something. His points are well expressed and he does not resort to personal attacks. He does not use cute rhetorical devices or indiscriminate sloganism.

      He is not the only male out there that has been done over by the government sponsored man-hating machine. All power to him.

      Like most people who struggled with a job to feed themselves, I consider myself and others lucky that the Eric’s of the world are our leaders rather than some moron who thinks a smelly, mass-mudering, long-haired psychopath such as Che Guevara was a cool dude.

      Snigger all you like, James Arvanitakis and others because that is all you have. Your ilk cannot debate one to one with Eric, so you fall back on sniggering, villification and satire. They are the only tools the left have.

    • CityWorker says:

      04:02pm | 08/04/11

      AFR: YOU must be freaking kidding ME.

      Is Erick’s fully sick radness overloading your awesome filters? Look at it this way, if being the first post nine times out of ten gets you a column, you might be in the running to get one yourself.

    • mike j says:

      06:24pm | 08/04/11

      For once, Mahhrat, I might have to agree with you. Sans all the emo posturing and Gok-worship, obviously.

      AFR, it’s not Erick’s fault that no-one with a vagina is capable of logic and rational debate. You’re letting your own inadequacy manifest as spurious accusations of bigotry.

    • Gladys says:

      12:03pm | 08/04/11

      I was going to insist on this response.

      But you beat me to it.

      Love your work!!

    • Erick says:

      01:28pm | 08/04/11

      Thank you Gladys.

      For those who think this article is too insipid and egoistic to stand on its own, you are right. The Punch editors gave me a sneak peek at James’ article, and suggested that I write a response to go immediately underneath it.

      This was that response - a semi-tongue-in-cheek reply to a semi-tongue-in-cheek article. I didn’t intend it to stand on its own, and so I feel it’s rather lacking. I have in fact mostly-written a more serious introduction to myself, but being a lazy-arse bastard, I never finished it, so this is what Punchers are stuck with.

    • Direct says:

      04:10pm | 08/04/11

      Agreed. Love your work too, Erick.

      Keep fighting the good fight.

    • The Galah from Hervey Bay says:

      06:26pm | 08/04/11

      Erick , the recognition is well deserved .  Keep putting out the sensible message . Great to see you in number one position on the column and always look forward to an informed read.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      08:39am | 09/04/11

      Erick, I would guess few Punchers are familiar with the Devil’s Advocate approach to fostering debate. Sometimes it is important to step outside of the herd and make sure they are not all headed towards a cliff, blinded by their own dust.

      Good to see you get some recognition.

    • Gladys says:

      12:04pm | 08/04/11

      You’re a fake?

    • Erick says:

      01:31pm | 08/04/11

      No, Gladys. I’m real, my opinions are real, and I am not a Punch journalist, a (current) political staffer, or anyone other than who I appear to be.

      However, my true beliefs and motives are not what my opponents might think they are. They hardly ever ask the right questions - just make assumptions that are usually wrong.

    • NicoleG says:

      01:51pm | 08/04/11

      Ok Erick, are you Left, Right or in the middle? Just asking.

    • Erick says:

      02:05pm | 08/04/11

      NicoleG, I think I’m probably more to the right. Though I also have some left-type opinions, I don’t like all the baggage they come with. The individual freedoms and choices espoused by the right appeal to me. Also, righties won’t hate me just for being white, (cis-)male, and hterosexual.

    • Gladys says:

      02:11pm | 08/04/11

      Well this is the other question: you study sociology and you’ve been conducting a major experiment about opinion and what drives it, basing your research on the two theories above.

      I’ve offered you hugs in the past, Erick. I’m feeling like an idiot now.

    • Erick says:

      02:40pm | 08/04/11

      No, Gladys, I don’t study sociology - at least not officially. My interests are purely my own, not driven by any academic or political institution. I have a real job which pays me to stay alive, and all the rest is my own initiative.

      In fact I have both academic and political backgrounds, but I’ve given them up in order to be able to just say whatever I like.

      That’s why I’m free to say anything I please. I’m anonymous and independent (within the constraints of a technological society), and I don’t answer to anyone except myself. The opinions you see here are my opinions, though I confess I might occasionally enhance things for dramatic effect.

    • Chris L says:

      08:14pm | 08/04/11

      “Also, righties won’t hate me just for being white, (cis-)male, and hterosexual.” - maybe not Erick, but if you dare to disagree with them on any issue they will turn on you in an instant (well, certain members of that group will).

    • Dirk Hartog says:

      12:07pm | 08/04/11

      Am I first?

    • Dirk Hartog says:

      12:17pm | 08/04/11

      Bugger. Have to get up earlier. How do you do it, Erick?

    • The Original Oz says:

      12:19pm | 08/04/11

      No Dirk - EricK beat you to it again

    • Obvious says:

      12:09pm | 08/04/11

      In other words, obvious troll is obvious.

    • Ryan says:

      02:01pm | 08/04/11

      Or boring inane statement is getting really boring.

    • Obvious says:

      02:33pm | 08/04/11

      Thanks, Ryan. I couldn’t agree more. There’s nothing more boring and inane than obvious trolls, with the possible exception of those who feed them.

    • TChong says:

      12:10pm | 08/04/11

      Erick ! That pic really you?
      Had heard rumors about your devilish good looks, and debonair air.
      Next time though,  make sure you set the flash , as well as the timer.

    • Erick says:

      01:32pm | 08/04/11

      I never was good with fandangled technology. :(

    • female says:

      10:15am | 11/04/11

      you have a fat neck. i suppose its no surprise that you’re a footballer.

    • RGG says:

      12:12pm | 08/04/11

      Dear Punch: This is utterly ridiculous and belongs on Livejournal.

    • Barry says:

      12:28pm | 08/04/11

      Please don’t tell me you actually take the Punch seriously in the first place!  It’s B-grade journalism for the most part anyway.

    • michael j says:

      01:28pm | 08/04/11

      FU*k it i just left a comment on the last article about PUNCH giving Eric a guest column,,ahh well lest the comments will be coming here now so Eric wont get the record after all,,,,most comments,,,

    • Mensur ?ehi? says:

      02:56pm | 09/04/11

      @Barry

      How is it B-grade? What’s A-Grade? ‘The Australian’? With its ‘white Australia’ propagandists and militarists? Or ‘Herald Sun’, with its half-assed approach to pretty much everything - including the very purpose of that ‘newspaper’s’ existence?

    • majority says:

      12:12pm | 08/04/11

      Erick, you were previously a left wing activist, what caused you to change? Was it any one event?

    • Tedd says:

      01:09pm | 08/04/11

      It seems he still is, and plays devils advocate, aka a troll or even a p.o.e.

    • Super D says:

      01:11pm | 08/04/11

      Or is he still a left wing activist just being “ironic”?

    • Erick says:

      01:40pm | 08/04/11

      @majority, it was not any one event, but a gradual realisation that the left-wing approach was in fact creating the very things it purported to oppose. Also, the realisation that where the Left proclaimed equality - which I supported - what it actually did was simply to create new forms of inequality. That people like me were the targets of this new oppression was simply the icing on the cake.

      @ Tedd and Super D - I’m someone who actually believes in equal rights, freedom of speech, and equality of opportunity. Over the years, I’ve decided that the Left has good intentions but bad outcomes, and so I tend to side with the Right these days.

    • A Bob says:

      03:03pm | 08/04/11

      My personal suspicion is that Eric(k)‘s lefty ex-wife suddenly went all cappo and took him for everything he had.

    • Erick says:

      03:55pm | 08/04/11

      A Bob - Sorry, but I have never personally suffered from Australia’s sexist divorce laws. When my lefty ex-girlfriend and I broke up, we did it amicably, and divided our possessions by mutual consent. We did not have any children.

      When I rant about the effects of evil divorce courts, I am ranting about their effects on other people. I am living quite comfortably, without any problems of that sort.

    • Shifter says:

      12:15pm | 08/04/11

      Was anyone else wondering if Erick would be first to comment on his own article? Would that be fulfilling some form of grandfather paradox and destroy the space-time continuum as we know it?

      Yes. Off-topic, but it is Friday.

    • Jedi_T says:

      01:29pm | 08/04/11

      I wondered the same myself Shifter!

    • iansand says:

      12:15pm | 08/04/11

      Erick

      I can see yer problem.  You think you are a dissenting voice here.  As demonstrated by the response to James’ article you are right in the mainstream here.  For a true dissenting voice you need to look to Persephone or The Chongster.  Or you should be fighting the good fight on Crikey or The Drum.  Here you are just another scared weird little guy on scared weird little guy central.

      Love

      iansand

    • AdamC says:

      12:45pm | 08/04/11

      Ian Sand, Erick may as well Punch here, where he has a chance of convincing moderates, rather than annoy the trots and Hizb ut Tahrir members over at the Drum, or the seven reading Crikey who aren’t Bernard Keane’s friends and relatives.

      Besides, the Punch is way more fun that those horrible places, no matter what your politics.  The Drum Unleashed denizens in particular take themselves waaaay to seriously!

    • BlogWars says:

      12:48pm | 08/04/11

      Crikey is for public servants who need to feel superior to the retirees that read The Drum.

    • Elin says:

      12:55pm | 08/04/11

      Thankyou iansand.
      Complaining that straight white men are really the put upon ones at the same time rubbishing women is not dissenting or breaking the status quo. It is a very old and tired bit.

    • sha says:

      12:59pm | 08/04/11

      “scared weird little guy…“Thats something I CAN agree with.

    • Erick says:

      01:47pm | 08/04/11

      @iansand - I am the dissenting voice from most of the article writers, not necessarily from the article readers. The readers may dissent, but many of them don’t have my good fortune in being granted articulacy.

      As for Crikey and The Drum, they are nauseating cesspits of left-wing groupthink which I prefer to avoid. The Drum is very heavily censored, and most of my comments never get posted there, so it would be pointless for me to go there. Crikey? Why even bother?

    • Johnny says:

      02:04pm | 08/04/11

      Crikey costs and The Drum won’t publish conservative comments - people have tested this. But atleast our tax money isn’t paying for the the drum website…oh wait

    • iansand says:

      02:30pm | 08/04/11

      It appears that people here really believe that the articles on The Punch are left wing.  Can I suggest the occasional journey outside your sheltered workshops?

    • Seanr says:

      02:33pm | 08/04/11

      You’re right about The Drum crowd taking themselves too seriously AdamC, I tried a mild sexist joke as a response to one of the deep thinking feminists there (in my opinon she was being a drama queen) ...did not go over well at all…oops

    • Levi says:

      03:33pm | 08/04/11

      iansand, Persephone and Chongy are both Labor hacks, as well as yourself, you should know. Just because someone doesn’t share your view doesn’t make them wrong.

      BTW you just proved Ericks point. When someone, especially a conformist to the loony left, has no reasonable response to an argument or discussion, they resort to personal attacks. I sense YOU are actually the scared little weird guy.

      Love

      Levi (Not a Jew by the way, so don’t unleash your anti-semitism on me please….Thanks)

      Bye Bye now

    • AdamC says:

      03:40pm | 08/04/11

      Ian Sand, some Punch articles are from a left-wing perspective and some aren’t. There is a reasonable mix, actually. There is also a reasonable mix of stuff on the Drum. It is the commenters that make the Punch more pluralistic, and less dire.

    • bobw says:

      03:58pm | 08/04/11

      iansand - I wouldn’t say he’s “just another” scared weird little guy.  He’s a scared weird little guy with some kind of messiah complex, if the above is to be taken at face value (and who knows whether it is).  Unfortunately, any delusions of grandeur are only going to be magnified by today’s events.

      @Levi:  It’s all but guaranteed that whenever somebody smugly rolls out the old “you’ve proved my/X’s point” line, they’ll go on to demonstrate nothing of the sort.  No exception here.

    • Against the Man says:

      04:06pm | 08/04/11

      TChong Labor stooge would be credible if he could back up his points and come to terms with his true political leanings. Sadly he is supporting a hopeless political party - The Australian Labor Party where corruption and incompetence come home to roost smile

    • CD says:

      04:32pm | 08/04/11

      What’s wrong iansand didn’t get your own article?

      Seriously get over it. Same goes to all who can’t take a light hearted look on a Friday.

      I’d have been just as happy with Persephone or TChong or hell even that horrid Marilyn Shepherd. Erick just happens to be that first poster few seem to beat for that place.

    • iansand says:

      04:48pm | 08/04/11

      Levi - That was GOOD.  Do you need a tissue to dry the foam off your lips?

    • Levi says:

      06:31pm | 08/04/11

      bobw….what part of “Here you are just another scared weird little guy on scared weird little guy central.” is not a personal attack? Does iansand have any proof whatsoever that that is what Erick is? So yes I have proved my point and you now have egg on your face for skimming and not reading.

      iansand, no I don’t need a tissue, being an evil, fat conservative capitalist means i lost the ability to act human a long time ago. Thanks anyway. Perhaps you need one to dry the tears under your eyes because your left-wing diatrabes have lost out to Erick. Don’t worry mate, you’ll get your place in the sun one day when Che Guevara comes back from the dead at the head of a zombie revolutionary army.

    • Chris L says:

      08:24pm | 08/04/11

      “When someone, especially a conformist to the loony left, has no reasonable response to an argument or discussion, they resort to personal attacks” - Way to not resort to a personal attack Levi.

      I feel the same about the Punch, in that they seem to allow all sides to speak. I spent a few months trying to make counterpoints to Piers but found the only dissenting posts he allowed were the rabid, senseless ones in order to make it seem that everyone who disagreed with him was unstable. Of course his fans lapped it up and seem to truly believe it.

      Many disagree with Erick, and at times I have too, but his opinion is allowed like the rest of us. Even the complaints (usually on religious articles) that we’re trying to stifle free speech get posted. If only those people understood irony (yes the word is appropriate in this case!).

    • iansand says:

      09:34am | 09/04/11

      Levi - You are right.  A tissue would not have worked.  I have a roll of paper towels when you are ready.

    • suzie says:

      06:24am | 11/04/11

      Iansand - if you are a male, and single, and over five ft 10” - will you marry me?

    • Cloud Strife says:

      12:16pm | 08/04/11

      I NOTICE THERE IS NO MENTION OF WOMEN IN THIS ARTICLE. THIS IS SEXISM AT ITS MOST BLATANT. FOR SHAME!

      wink

    • DJ says:

      01:35pm | 08/04/11

      no need to shout, Cloud Strife, YOU STUPID WOMAN.

    • NicoleG says:

      01:54pm | 08/04/11

      Ok, she shouted, but that’s no reason to call her stupid. Bluudy numpty!

    • Erick says:

      02:07pm | 08/04/11

      Okay, Cloud Strife.

      “All women are bastards!!”

      Happy now? smile

    • CABAL says:

      02:08pm | 08/04/11

      Cloud Strife is a male character from the 1997 video game Final Fantasy 7 released on PS and PC so unless this person is just a little bit strange I imagine they are a guy…

    • Markus says:

      02:44pm | 08/04/11

      @CABAL, yes, Cloud Strife is the (arguably) male character from the 1997 video game Final Fantasy 7, who many gamer/anime girls get girl-boners over due to his/her androgynous look.
      I get the impression Cloud Strife falls into that category smile

    • PJ says:

      03:09pm | 08/04/11

      LMAO DJ,

      Comment of the week!

    • PJ says:

      03:11pm | 08/04/11

      Cabal,

      Issued with a FAIL card…DJ was mentioning women so the Cloud Strife would be happy ‘women’ were mentioned.

    • Chris L says:

      08:35pm | 08/04/11

      @PJ, a fail card for you… unless somehow Cabal was making some complaint that I didn’t comprehend (always possible).

      @Erick roflol…. etc.

    • SM says:

      12:16pm | 08/04/11

      I’d rather Zeta

    • bella starkey says:

      12:32pm | 08/04/11

      + a million

    • stephen says:

      01:42pm | 08/04/11

      Yes fellas, it’s easy to entertain the masses.
      But zeta’s good - very good - but she has a partner in honesty, if not downright crime, (in discontinous opinion, that is) and Erick is, if not anything else, very early.

    • Chris L says:

      01:44pm | 08/04/11

      There’s a few good regulars, but I agree with putting Zeta up there. Mind you, I do sometimes feel that there are two people posting as Zeta, one is funny and scarily insightful, the other is not.

    • Audra Blue says:

      01:47pm | 08/04/11

      Nah you guys.  Elphaba is the lone sane voice in the wilderness!

    • AFR says:

      03:35pm | 08/04/11

      Isn’t Zeta a dude?

    • notSue says:

      04:11pm | 08/04/11

      Yes, Zeta is a"dude”..and is far more deserving of his own piece than this clown!

      The entire effect of “Eric(k) Day” has been to lessen my desire to read or post here, I’m afraid..although I’ll probably continue to do so (not that anybody gives a shit, including me really, it’s all just hot air anyway.) You’ve managed to undermine your credibility with this blatant fishing exercise/sociological experiment, Punch team.

    • bella starkey says:

      04:16pm | 08/04/11

      Zeta is totally a dude.

      or the dude.

      I was fully into him until he revealed he was a fatty

    • stephen says:

      04:17pm | 08/04/11

      Zeta is a University student from the Sunshine Coast.
      A girl, too. And pretty.

    • NicoleG says:

      04:23pm | 08/04/11

      Oh dear, what’s the matter notSue? You’re crankier than usual today. Did you get out on the wrong side of the bed?

    • PJ says:

      04:35pm | 08/04/11

      There, there notSue, go down to the local feminists meeting and reminisce when bra burning didn’t have Carbon Tax implications.

    • stephen says:

      05:17pm | 08/04/11

      Oh, and I forgot to say : there’s nothing wrong with being a Fashion House Manager, either.
      Zeet ?

    • notSue says:

      06:10pm | 08/04/11

      @n=Nicole G Yeah, it must be hormonal.

      If you believe that, then join Eric in the “all women are irrrational manhaters” conga line.

    • notSue says:

      06:40pm | 08/04/11

      And maybe I’m cranky it’s because I feel betrayed as a Punch reader and poster that a polarising pot- stirrer (ie Erick) has been given such a soapbox. ( If he isn’t a plant).  It’s insulting to the rest of the community and makes me feel as though this place is just a gigantic joke.

      I naively thought this place was mainly about serious conversation on important (or at least topical) subjects. Obviously I have been mislead.

      “Jumped the shark” indeed.

    • The Original Oz says:

      12:17pm | 08/04/11

      EricK - Have you ever heard of the Dopeler Effect? No, not a typo and nothing to do with radar. The Dopeler Effect is defined as the tendency for stupid ideas to appear sensible when they come at you fast enough.

      Pretty much the way the fanatical Greenies and our current august ruling Labor party try to force consensus on topics such as Global Warming and the need for a Carbon Tax. Also very much the MO of the Islam is all fairies and rainbows troupe. Repeat it often enough and everyone will believe. It is dissenting opinions such as those of EricK help to prevent the Dopeler Effect from squashing free-thinking and critical analysis of matters that have an impact on all.

    • Erick says:

      03:04pm | 08/04/11

      Thanks, Original Oz. I haven’t heard of that one, though I’m quite familiar with the more famous Doppler Effect. I’ll look it up!

    • Erick says:

      03:09pm | 08/04/11

      Hmmm, it would seem that conversely, smart ideas would appear dumber the less often they are mentioned. smile

    • Chris L says:

      08:53pm | 08/04/11

      Why didn’t “Moving forward” sound like a good idea then?

    • The Original Oz says:

      12:18pm | 08/04/11

      EricK - Have you ever heard of the Dopeler Effect? No, not a typo and nothing to do with radar. The Dopeler Effect is defined as the tendency for stupid ideas to appear sensible when they come at you fast enough.

      Pretty much the way the fanatical Greenies and our current august ruling Labor party try to force consensus on topics such as Global Warming and the need for a Carbon Tax. Also very much the MO of the Islam is all fairies and rainbows troupe. Repeat it often enough and everyone will believe. It is dissenting opinions such as those of EricK help to prevent the Dopeler Effect from squashing free-thinking and critical analysis of matters that have an impact on all.

    • Seano says:

      01:27pm | 08/04/11

      Kudos for both defining and demonstrating the term.

    • Daniel says:

      12:20pm | 08/04/11

      “harmful groupthink” I like it. Check out Piers blog then…

    • JC says:

      12:20pm | 08/04/11

      Haters gon’ hate.

    • Jim says:

      12:20pm | 08/04/11

      You were a lot calmer than I would have been Erick…well said.

    • Sha-shin says:

      12:22pm | 08/04/11

      Erick, sometimes I agree with you and sometimes I don’t.

      What many punchers don’t seem to understand is that agreement is not necessary when considering a topic.

      The only thing ever necessary is can you justify your stance with logic and fact. I’m not asking you to do that here, I’m just saying that is all that matters in any discussion.

      Unfortunately, on many threads people are too PC and willing to be “popular” and it destroys the quality of the discussion.

    • Marko says:

      05:55pm | 08/04/11

      good point

    • Mr Pod says:

      12:22pm | 08/04/11

      All of a sudden he’s full of himself and serious , I see a tall poppy ....  Booooooooo Hissssssssssssssssssss Boooooooooooooooo Boooooooooooo Hissssssssssss

    • Anthony says:

      12:28pm | 08/04/11

      I thought I had opened up facebook. The punch obviously had a strategic meeting and eric was the dummy they dragged out.

    • David LD says:

      12:33pm | 08/04/11

      Dear Punch,

      Your blog sucks.

      Giving a column to the guy that repeatedly derails threads with the very first comment is ridiculous.

      Where’s Persephone’s or acotrel’s piece?

    • Ben81 says:

      01:08pm | 08/04/11

      Ha, I can understand admiring the way Persephone puts that extra personal spin and effort above and beyond a mere Labor party press release, but that guy?  ...why?

    • The Original Oz says:

      01:18pm | 08/04/11

      If persephone or acotroll could get their noses out of the Labor playbook they may be considered interesting. Until then I don’t see that an article about either of them could be of any interest whatsoever.

    • Richard says:

      02:00pm | 08/04/11

      Persephone does deserve her own blog. I mean, she’s so long-winded that it would be a relief if she could be quarantined into a blog of her own and not incessantly pollute the comments section like she regularly does.

      But Alan Cotterell? You’ve got to be kidding. (Unless you have an unhealthy interest in workchoices, health and safety and GRUBS)

    • Freeman says:

      02:24pm | 08/04/11

      Pers and Acotrel weren’t the subject of a personal piece by a regular author, david,..... derrrrrrrrrr!!!

      So what if Erick comments 1st in most threads? if his points weren’t valid he would be ignored

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      03:37pm | 08/04/11

      I assume persephone’s is on the ALP website somewhere.

    • malohi says:

      07:12pm | 08/04/11

      Why the hate?
      Erick argues the form (takes the argument, finds the hole in the logic behind it and attacks it succinctly with no regard for the audience. Most people hate because they cannot see the domino effect after the hole he exploited, He is the scape goat of the most straw mans)
      Perseph argues the substance (head on against the issues mixing in her opinion and choosing her audience a bit more tactfully, perhaps the most courageous approach as it is easy to get called out if you stuff up. Clearly more political)

      And Acotrel argues a bit of both but has a wealth of experience in such a broad range of field. Sometimes it is shocking some of the stuff he comes out with, you cant learn all of that from google.

      I don’t know these people like I dont know descartes or socrates and I dont always agree, but to argue one style is better or more deserving than another is ridiculous. They all effectively make points without becoming boring. The Erick haters however…...

    • james milton says:

      07:58pm | 08/04/11

      persephone and alcotrel don’t have anything unique to say. They parrot the exact same BS you get from left-wing stations like the ABC and SBS and Crikey and The Drum.

      Erick has yet to make an assertion or point that he could not back up. If you have an example to disprove that, I would be very interested to hear it.

    • Chris L says:

      09:00pm | 08/04/11

      I’d like to point out in Persephone’s defense (Yes Erick, maybe it’s that traitorous, misandric, lefty instinct to be protective of the breasted gender) but she brings in facts, statistics and sometimes links to make her point. Also she generally does not resort to personal insults even when she is on the receiving end of some pretty harsh attacks.

      I used to agree a lot with Acotrel, but lately it has been at the point where a reasonable left winger should admit their side isn’t doing so well. Not as bad as the Doom & Gloom crowd puts it, and probably no worse than the Howard government, but still kinda difficult to defend with any integrity. Pers manages it by admitting the failures and pointing out the strengths.

    • Bryndal says:

      12:36pm | 08/04/11

      “Even if only one other person stated the truth, the last person became much harder to convince. And that’s why it’s important to have a dissenting voice; it helps prevent the stifling unanimity that leads to so many bad results for a society.”

      If only your dissent was based on truth you might have something.

    • james milton says:

      08:00pm | 08/04/11

      Please cite 2 specific examples.

      Otherwise you are, as usual, attacking the man and not the issues. So nothing new there then.

    • Sam Chowder says:

      12:38pm | 08/04/11

      Now I know the disappointment Dorothy felt finding the Wizard.

    • John says:

      12:48pm | 08/04/11

      Any particular reason that Erick cannot show his face.  Is it part of the mystique?  Or is it ego driven?  Or is it that conservative trollers are essentially bullies and therefore cowards?

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      01:25pm | 08/04/11

      Or is it the classic gambit of keeping the people wanting more? I’m sure you licked the screen after you made your post.

    • Tom says:

      01:38pm | 08/04/11

      Not sure if your question is serious.  I would not put my face on these pages.

      Your last sentence is an example of the irrational nutters that read his comments. Enough said.

    • Chris L says:

      01:50pm | 08/04/11

      He’s a dentist, so they can’t show you his face.

    • Bitten says:

      09:27pm | 08/04/11

      Chris L = Winning!

    • TracyH says:

      10:06am | 11/04/11

      I’d love to read a piece from, SSR…offensive and bloody nasty but soooo very funny!!!

    • Pete says:

      12:51pm | 08/04/11

      One day Erick will post first, comment and everyone else will agree with him. scary I know. apart from being very entertaining for a Friday, it must be gratifying for Erick to know he has cemented a place for himself in posters hearts.  So when you posters get retrosternal chest pain radiating down your left arm, and think you are having an infarction. Rest easy, its just Erick

    • Phil says:

      12:58pm | 08/04/11

      Mark this date. It’s the day that The Punch ‘jumped the shark’

    • Swingdog says:

      01:10pm | 08/04/11

      Yep, the Punch has officially disappeared up its own arse.

    • Lauren says:

      01:02pm | 08/04/11

      First I find out that Andrew Bolt has been given his own show on Channel 10, and now this on The Punch.

      What a headache.

    • Ben81 says:

      01:10pm | 08/04/11

      Oh no, you’ll be forced to hear and read things you don’t want to.  Censor them!

    • Ryan says:

      02:06pm | 08/04/11

      Better call Stephen Conroy, demand that internet filter sooner!

    • CJ Morgan says:

      02:09pm | 08/04/11

      I think that Erick should team up with Blot.  They could call their collaboration “The Inciters”.

    • jhamiltonwa says:

      10:16pm | 08/04/11

      @CJ Good pitch; I’d watch that show.

    • malohi says:

      01:05pm | 08/04/11

      WowEee i was ever so excited to see your article. But Where was the controversy?
      You have put your toe in the pool now mate.
      Please do not be scared to go for the big bomb dive, I for one look forward to it, finally you may be able to battle with a home ground advantage. I wonder if they will let you “fairly” moderate the comments,
      morefromErickplz.

    • Erick says:

      01:53pm | 08/04/11

      Sorry Malohi, this was just meant as a short response to James’ article.

      If I can ever overcome my terminal laziness I might come up with something more substantial.

    • john says:

      01:06pm | 08/04/11

      Erik and ‘white noise’ is one and the same.

    • Erick says:

      04:00pm | 08/04/11

      There are some very interesting things about white noise. One of them is the fact that the more information is carried by a signal, the more closely it comes to resemble white noise.

      This has profound implications for our understanding of the universe.

    • Dan says:

      01:21pm | 08/04/11

      FAKE - this was staged !!

      Is Erick really just an undercover puncher pretending to punch against The Punch ?.

    • BLAH! says:

      05:37pm | 08/04/11

      Read the article again,...

    • Reggie says:

      12:45pm | 10/04/11

      Alright then I’m sick of this. Erick is NOT a New Zealand spy who has shat in the Punch Bowl.  I’m buggered if I’m going to waste any more eyesight on reading this.

    • Knemon says:

      01:30pm | 08/04/11

      Good on you Erick…You usually make more sense than the majority of posters on Punch ever do or could.

    • Seano says:

      01:31pm | 08/04/11

      It would be much funnier if someone changed the title of the article to “I am woman!” With the appropriate Helen Reddy film clip of course.

    • Dark Horse says:

      01:34pm | 08/04/11

      Goodonyamate. Keep writing and giving some of those who are intellectually vacuuous something to think about.

    • Seano says:

      07:09pm | 08/04/11

      I suspect a number of people laughed heartily at the satirical backhander dealt to Erick and his supporters earlier today.  I suspect even more have had a giggle at the self important response.

      A similar phenomena occured when Team America: World Police came out. Whilst taking the piss from both left and right, many of the intelectuals on the right saw it the movie as a blue print for American foriegn policy and as just “telling it like it is”.

    • DJ says:

      01:38pm | 08/04/11

      Erik is a born again conservative who has seen the light after a lifetime of evil left wing activism. I love him.

    • james milton says:

      08:04pm | 08/04/11

      Just like Julian Assange. Intelligent people with morals don’t stay on the left. It’s either the sheep repeating the PC mantra, or it’s entrepreneurs who know there’s a lot of money to be made from the left, ie taxing the plebs so they can live the high life.

    • Audra Blue says:

      01:53pm | 08/04/11

      Sounds like Erick has fallen victim to the old “my mum thinks I’m special ergo it must be true” maxim.  *sigh*  I’m glad it’s Friday.

    • Erk says:

      02:04pm | 08/04/11

      I feel as though I’ve stumbled upon a uni sophomore’s MySpace page.

    • John Smythe says:

      02:25pm | 08/04/11

      This, and its predecessor article make feel like I’ve just been Rick Rolled…

      Still, good piece of fun and a change from the usual stuff.

    • Obvious says:

      03:58pm | 08/04/11

      The addition of the ‘k’ was a dead giveaway. E rick.

      Nice cheap clickbait, Penbo.

    • Jon says:

      02:33pm | 08/04/11

      Erik, always enjoyed your comments. I agreed with you about the Left, I am not sure if the Left, Left me or I the Left, either way the Left has lost its way and has nothing Left.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:36pm | 08/04/11

      Now why the hell doesn’t the Punch give the same treatment to Zeta?

    • stephen says:

      03:12pm | 08/04/11

      Because you are Zeta.

    • bec says:

      04:25pm | 08/04/11

      We haven’t seen you in the same picture before, tis true…

    • meh says:

      04:26pm | 08/04/11

      It is much more interesting to get into the head of someone who can stir people up rather than the ones people go “oh that person is so nice and thoughtful”.

      AMAL had Anon, Erick were you Anon?

    • St. Michael says:

      11:51pm | 08/04/11

      @ stephen: Good God, no, I’m not Zeta.  His comic timing is more than I could ever hope to achieve.

    • LeonT says:

      02:54pm | 08/04/11

      Erick, while there are some rare occasions that the village idiot is a visionary in disguise; most of the the time they are just an idiot.

    • Kathy says:

      02:59pm | 08/04/11

      Erick, are you an Aries by any chance…we just love playing Devil’s Advocate.

    • Stephy says:

      03:19pm | 08/04/11

      This feels like a Meet and Greet….

    • Knemon says:

      09:21pm | 08/04/11

      LOL grin

    • Andy says:

      04:15pm | 08/04/11

      I hate all this stuff, can we get back to slagging Abbott and Gillard please.

    • CD says:

      04:22pm | 08/04/11

      Erick

      I read daily but post rarely. I may not always agree with you but hell man I find I have a similar background but I don’t hate women.

      I went from leftie to moderate and personally I love what Punch did.

      More power to you Erick. Live long and annoy!

    • Erick says:

      05:32pm | 08/04/11

      I don’t hate women either.

      Don’t believe everything my opponents say.

    • Greg says:

      01:42pm | 09/04/11

      Sticking up for men’s rights occasionally does not mean that you hate women, despite the feminist propaganda that claims otherwise.

    • Luke says:

      10:14am | 11/04/11

      Well said greg…

    • Semi Concerned Citizen says:

      04:36pm | 08/04/11

      Keep Punching Erick, you are consistent, concise and stay true to your points. The reactions you garner from fellow punchers is very entertaining.

    • Erick Power! says:

      04:38pm | 08/04/11

      Erick, I hope you are rewarded with your own blog so we can unleash relentless tirades against the anti-family femi-nazi movement.

    • Bobster says:

      04:48pm | 08/04/11

      I F***ing knew it! Anyone who’s studied Identity Politics will hate feminists for at least six month - sometimes it’s terminal.

      Also, WTF did Erick get his own column for? Whose idea was this and if I start putting my real email address in here, does that mean I can have a column too?

    • Kika says:

      05:14pm | 08/04/11

      It’s a punch conspiracy. Erick is a pseudonym for someone who writes for the punch and just says inflammatory things to get people blogging. I have a feeling that Erick and Sad Sad Reality are one and the same…

    • Sad Sad Reality says:

      11:26pm | 08/04/11

      Not only are we one and the same, we’re actually a piece of self aware software floating in the ether of cyberspace. We have a single aim: to hold women accountable for their superficiality, selfishness, vacuousness, hypocrisy, lies of omission and dazzling absence of self awareness. It’s going to be a long millennium.

    • MarkH says:

      04:49pm | 08/04/11

      I call bullcrap on this. No, really. Someone so unabashedly frank as you on the internet? NEVA!! wink j/k

      And now you’re being the subject of front page stories on News.com.au web site too?

      Please, please don’t let this turn into another GrogGamut episode. Please.

      This fan just couldn’t stand the excitement of yet more Erick goodness and posting dramas.

    • iansand says:

      06:37pm | 08/04/11

      It is now clear that The Punch stuffed up the change from daylight saving.  They moved their clocks back a week, instead of an hour.

    • CJ Morgan says:

      10:50pm | 08/04/11

      This just gets stranger and stranger, doesn’t it?

      Oh well, it makes a change from bashing the Greens smile

    • skepdad says:

      08:23am | 10/04/11

      I don’t know if Colgo is trying to be clever or if the whole thing’s a joke, but I’m a bit tired of seeing anti-misandry painted as misogyny.

    • TheRealDave says:

      04:56pm | 08/04/11

      WHAT THE FISH!?!?

      I get home from a long hard day at the office (lol - I like saying that out loud….as if any day is hard in IT…but I digress)...anyways, I get home, fire up the old Firefox to queue up a few shows (Bones, Mentalist, CSI and Big Bang) and there is HEADLINE news on NEws.com.au about bloody Erick!

      Seriously!?!?!

      I get the joke on the Punch site amongst us regulars….but Headline story on news.com.au?!?!?

      Surely something actually happened int he world today…..

    • john says:

      05:19pm | 08/04/11

      @ TheRealDave

      “Surely something actually happened int he world today….. “

      nope, nothing.

    • Ben81 says:

      08:19pm | 08/04/11

      Where’s Charlie Sheen when you need him?

    • Patrick says:

      04:57pm | 08/04/11

      crap.. i hate it when you get beaten to ‘The Punch’

    • mw says:

      05:07pm | 08/04/11

      It’s like it’s raining sycophants and narcissism…

    • slapper says:

      05:24pm | 08/04/11

      En route to exposing your friends, you expose yourself - the journey is truly only for the courageous.

    • Bitten says:

      09:36pm | 08/04/11

      I’m covering my eyes! There’s a whole lot of exposure going on there!

    • The Guardian says:

      05:27pm | 08/04/11

      I think the Punch just lost any credibility in may have had by posting this.News Ltd/Newscorp has become a one trick pony.Good Luck and good night!

    • Matt says:

      05:46pm | 08/04/11

      The Guardian, why is Erick any less qualified to post up a blog as opposed to, say, James Arvanitakis, Angry Cripple, or Damien Leith?

    • notSue says:

      07:13pm | 08/04/11

      Because it’s all about HIM, not about anything interesting or topical.

    • james milton says:

      08:08pm | 08/04/11

      @notSue

      does Erick suffer from prostate cancer, or is he rightfully annoyed that the breast cancer lobby gets all the funding and publicity while the prostate cancer lobby gets the crumbs that fall off the table?

      is the above example ‘not interesting’? is it ‘not topical’? people die unnecessarily, and people like you demean a person who wants to change it, and make it a fairer system for all.

    • not ue says:

      08:42pm | 08/04/11

      @ James Milton. WTF?  Erm, the article was about Eric, not about any particular issue.
      No Eric isn’t a “topical’ issue. Eric is Eric, not anybody more important than any other poster. His opinions are his opinions on any subject, as are mine. He can blog his little heart out - elsewhere!

    • Matt says:

      10:09pm | 08/04/11

      A person, if they are written about directly on The Punch, should be able to Counterpunch. Perhaps your rage would best be directed at the piece written by James, rather than blaming Erick for a piece which by his own admission was supposed to be nothing more than a post under James’ article.

      Personally though, I enjoyed his contribution. wink

    • Luke says:

      05:30pm | 08/04/11

      ERICK!!
      YOU ARE MY IDOL!

    • sha says:

      06:39pm | 08/04/11

      You need to get out more.

    • Luke says:

      10:10am | 11/04/11

      We all do… we are on the internet aren’t we?

    • Holly says:

      05:42pm | 08/04/11

      And there I was thinking you must be in a hot new relationship and just too tired and distracted to comment.

    • Marko says:

      05:50pm | 08/04/11

      Erick - you are more than just one voice - you are the voice that represents many who share your insights , views and opinions

    • pete says:

      06:06pm | 08/04/11

      I just saw the phot of Erick at the beginning of the article, what I feared has come to pass.  Erick has been unmasked as oner of the ALP’s faceless men

    • John says:

      06:53pm | 08/04/11

      I think “Ben H of The Hills” should be given a voice.
      It’s the only intelligent reads I’ve came across that also sometimes praises my writings raspberry My Political views leans more to the right and i guess the far-right. I’m tend dislike capitalism, free markets, free trade, feminism and multiculturalism. I tend to see the left, center and the right today as Marxism. I’m all too aware of communist movements ever since they took control over Russia, and how their influence spread to Britain, France and the US. I also know about the working Frankfurt school and their Cultural Marxism agenda for the west They eventually became the liberals and the main frame work of western society. I absolutely despise the western mainstream media and the decedent culture of Hollywood. I also believe human rights organizations should be renamed marxist human rights organizations, because i believe the movement is not about human rights, but more about pushing a marxist agenda into Europe. By using human rights inc to allow the flooding of Europe with the third world and also use human rights inc to bomb some nations. I’m an Anarchistic Christian Intellectual Nationalist. I Guess what Erick says about feminism is correct, It directly comes from the Frankfurt School Of Marxists to divide and conqueror, using their classic tactic of class warfare. Blacks against Whites, Women against Men, Hetero’s against Homosexuals, Christians against Muslims. Just get the group to claim oppression and then point at the oppressor and let the infighting begin, then quietly raise the marxist flag in Europe. I see this stuff going on the front pages of the news. I also don’t pander racism and racist terms(words created by communist) as i believe racism is non existent. But anti-white sentiment which has been driven into the minds of the minority’s exists. This of course the work of the Marxists.

    • dancan says:

      07:25pm | 08/04/11

      how the hell did this single opinion become front page news on news.com.au?

    • Matt says:

      09:08pm | 08/04/11

      I thought that was quite unfair, and hardly national news.

    • Obvious says:

      09:11pm | 08/04/11

      Easily and cheaply, dancan. The Editor knows how to invent a persona that will generate hundreds of clicks, and for free.

    • skepdad says:

      09:26am | 10/04/11

      Actually Obvious, it’s the other way around.  Erick is a real person, and a good chunk of the other articles are ghostwritten by Penbo’s 8 year old niece.

    • Paul says:

      07:26pm | 08/04/11

      I was just alerted to this site and after looking over “Erick’s” comments, I think everyone here should be grateful “Erick” is able to comment at all.

      I don’t agree with everything anyone says, but I’m not afraid to hear it.

      We have serious issues with censorship in this country. I normally contribute to facebook, Drum and other smaller sites. Not all opinions are allowed. It is a shame.

      Thanks ‘The Punch’ for restoring free speech, I am your new fan!

    • blah says:

      07:34pm | 08/04/11

      I think society group thinks women into the root of all Evil, stating with Eve and ending with the EVIL “feminists” aka modern women.

    • John says:

      08:06pm | 08/04/11

      Ya just gotta love Erick’s logic. And his chutzpah. He reckons he knows how to strike a nerve with lefties because he has “a background as a left wing activist”. It seems he also knows how to strike a nerve with pretentious, narrow minded, smug, self satisfied dropkicks. Must be for the same reason. In fact, he’s so good, at it, if the logic follows, I reckon he must STILL be one - a pretentious, narrow minded, smug, self centred little dropkick, that is.

    • john says:

      08:26pm | 08/04/11

      ...someone forgot to take their medication before hitting the keyboard.

    • Mark says:

      08:49pm | 08/04/11

      You sound a bit nervy there, John.

    • Bob Mellows says:

      08:33pm | 08/04/11

      Does Zeta get an article now?

    • Sony B Goode says:

      09:12pm | 08/04/11

      The essentials of remaining a leftist, laborite, communist, socialist, democratic socialist, progressive etc is a pervasive form of intellectual myopia and an ability to not recognize cognitive dissonance. It is also critical not to investigate too deeply ones cherished beliefs in the light of reality.  Living in ivory towers of academia is virtually a guarantee of the sort intellectual blindness necessary to avoid confronting reality and the 100year pervasive failure of Marxist experimentation both economically and socially at every level.

      Like Erick I am a former leftist but over time as I shed more light on the core beliefs they faded and fell apart like so many chimeras, mirages that are clearly not based in the real world. Basically I came to the realization that all leftist ideas are incompatible with freedom. And that it is freedom that builds prosperity. Leftist ideals are sold by sugar coating them in noble rhetoric of equality, fairness, justice etc. people consume these ideas and can hold them as long as they don’t follow through the consequences and techniques necessary to bring them into fruition.
      Leftist ideas are by nature disingenuous and the anti-thesis of freedom and liberty. Virtually all leftists programs and idea can be demolished by simply examining the consequences and flow through of the results in the inter-connectedness of society. It is no mistake that leftist societies requite strong repression to persist, while societies that uphold and preserve basic freedoms thrive. While groupthink and the rhetoric of nobility sugar coating evil is the necessary element in a western democracy

    • St. Michael says:

      11:52pm | 08/04/11

      Short version of the above was once noted by Winston Churchill: “A man who is not a liberal by the time he is 20 has no heart.  A man who is not a conservative by the time he is 40 has no brain.”

    • Zeta says:

      09:23pm | 08/04/11

      I can’t believe I missed this…

    • Tory Shepherd

      Tory Shepherd says:

      10:24pm | 08/04/11

      Oh, Zeta, there you are! It wasn’t the same without you…

    • stephen says:

      08:09pm | 10/04/11

      I know who you are dirtbag.
      Wanna talk ?

      And you have no soul.

    • Luke says:

      10:14am | 11/04/11

      who says its over?

    • Dan says:

      10:07pm | 08/04/11

      So Erick who constantly publishes anti-women posts, is disgustingly Islamophobic, is anti-Semitic (he once compared practicing Muslims to Nazis), and posts hypocritical ‘woe upon the white heterosexual christian male’ posts get his own thread? Nice.

    • Dan says:

      01:35am | 09/04/11

      “Must be some truth to what he says then.”

      You’re kidding right? When has he ever said the truth? Ever?

      “And don’t use the term Islamophobic it makes you sound foolish.”

      If the shoes fits.

      I use the term Islamophobe because it’s appropriate. Erick is Islamophobic, and so the only people who are foolish are those who attempt to defend him. I guess you think that calling Fredrick Toben anti-Semitic is foolish. It’s not, just as it would be foolish not to call Erick an Islamophobe. Similarly, based on your lovely posts, It would be foolish not to call you an Islamophobe and a bigot!

      “just realistic about the daily horrors committed in its name.”

      He is definitely fearful, he wants to cut Islamic immigration!!!!!!!!!!

      Oh, and not being able to separate horrors perpetrated by extremists from the religion makes one a bigot, which is what Erick and you are.

      That massacre in the Ivory Coast BTW is about power, not religion.

      You may call yourself ‘reality’, however if you believe that anything Erick says has truth or that he isn’t a bigot, then you are not just a disgusting bigot but is clearly disconnected from reality as well.

    • Jon says:

      08:50am | 09/04/11

      Dan@ Islamophobic; by using that term, you have lost any right to be taken seriously.

    • james milton says:

      11:58am | 09/04/11

      @Dan

      Islamophobic? Wow, you need to start thinking before you type.

      Do you want Australia to become like the happy, utopian UK where Islam was given the red carpet treatment?

    • Ryan says:

      12:06pm | 09/04/11

      @Dan: perhaps you should look up what anti-Semitic means!

    • Levi says:

      12:25pm | 10/04/11

      Dan, If that massacre was about power, not religion, then why did they massacre 1000 christians and destroy their church, but not massacre 1000 muslims and destroy their mosque?

      Muslims are the majority in the Ivory coast so surely it would be easier for Muslims to be targeted? Apparently not.

      Egg on your face

    • the boyz says:

      10:49pm | 08/04/11

      Erick, You are my idol.
      While I dont agree with everything you say, you point out the facts after carefully unwrapping all the left wing bull that it gets caked in.

      Top job and keep up the good posts. Lets see if the punch actually gives you a job as a columnist, although I highly doubt they will!

      The boyz

    • grant says:

      11:56pm | 08/04/11

      God i hate you ‘the punch’ i don’t even know why i come back to read this shit. 

      Especially David penberthy.  He is the worst kind of journalist; well he isn’t really a journalist. 

      Come on moderator, you know he is a terrible writer… huh huh?  I’m right aren’t I.

      It’s o.k., I know you are reading this, and are secretly agreeing with me.

    • Zeta says:

      01:11am | 09/04/11

      I’ve been many things in my life - writer, lover, chaos magician / mathematician, demolitions expert, attractive, Sunshine Coast-based university student, political operative, man, supposed woman, occasional androdyne, armchair physicist, black market quantum mechanic, pirate journalist, amateur etymologist, video game theorist, Tasmanian - I’ve been two people, three people, no people. Alcoholic. Dependent on grey market pharmaceuticals - I’ve seen things you wouldn’t believe. Young Liberals stampeding like startled rhinos. C-beams glittering over the Tannhauser Gate. I’ve seen pristine forests where strip malls should be. Cookies on dowls. I’ve seen the Illuminati, and their Tweetdecks stretched across 19 surgical grade LCD displays winking the sum total of Australian left leaning sentiment in the antechamber beneath the sacrificial pyramid atop Holt Street. I’ve seen Colgo. And he looks nothing like his photo. All these things. Like eggs cracked on a hooker’s stomach. Lost in time.

      But there’s one thing I’ve never been. And that’s consistent.

      Erick, except for a silent K, you’re consistent. And that’s the highest compliment I can pay a comrade and fellow hustler. On Erick Day, when I wrote this, I was going to post it but I wanted to cut and paste it to check the spelling of ‘androdyne’. It’s not even a word. It’s my gift to you. Use it in a sentence. And tell them Zeta sent you.

      I won’t be around as much as usual. As I say to my secret Canadian family when I leave them for six months of the year ‘I’ve got a thing’. Look after Erick. Memes, even human ones, are delicate things, and if you’re not careful, they end up like Advice Dog. Or Lolcats. Or Joe Hildebrand.

      Look after each other. You’re a community now. A kind of disgruntled, violent, sublime community - like a maritime stop work meeting a few minutes after Germaine Greer deploys aerosol LSD through the air conditioning vents. That happened. I’m not even messing with you.

      If you don’t pay close attention your community ends up looking like a dead teenager’s Facebook memorial page. I don’t even know where I was going with that but I wrote it down in my analogy diary and haven’t used it yet.

      Keep trolling the obvious troll threads Tory provides you with. Good online commentary sites are positive feedback loops. Did you know Norbert Wiener invented that concept? If your name was Norbert Wiener would you even go outside let alone become a famous mathematician? Did you know they named his central contribution to the school of probability a Wiener Sausage? Just… yeah.

      All things being equal, I should be back around mid-November. That’s when the Punch will publish a story about high school violence. In every news room in every corner of the globe someone has a calendar with the last year’s major news stories on it, and on the anniversary or around about it they will repeat that story with a fresh angle. And so every year the anniversary story grows farther apart from the original in detail, like a game of Chinese whispers played with the media consumer’s sub-conscious. Columbine happened in November. There will be a school violence story in November and I’ll see you in the comments.

      It actually hurts the soul to know things like that. The average person neither cares nor wants the rainbow-shitting-unicorn magic of the media revealed to them. That’s one of the reasons I’m taking a break and using one of my less esoteric skill sets to make some money before I loaf around an office posting on The Punch all day sharing this wisdom like the nightmare owl your 1980s therapeutic hypnotist mistakes for a grey alien probing your butt. Sometimes I feel like the way the guy who planted the explosives in the World Trade Centre must feel. Like these secrets need to get out. Or at least that’s how he felt. Until Oprah killed him. That really happened too. Prove me wrong.

      We are all Erick. You are all Zeta. Keep the Punch punched until I get back.

    • Freeman says:

      09:19am | 09/04/11

      “You’re a community now. A kind of disgruntled, violent, sublime community - like a maritime stop work meeting a few minutes after Germaine Greer deploys aerosol LSD through the air conditioning vents. That happened. I’m not even messing with you”

      That’s the funniest S@#$ ever,  *wipes a tear*

    • Erick says:

      12:01pm | 09/04/11

      Thank you, Zeta. I look forward to your return. I shall construct an androdyne in your honour.

    • Al Chunk says:

      07:18pm | 09/04/11

      I was worried for a bit there, almost wincing incase I read “...and so to die”  Look forward to the return of your inspired ramblings.

    • Sam says:

      04:01am | 09/04/11

      Erick, I agree with you on issues such as multiculturalism, but can’t get on the same page re feminism and the environment.

      You see all of these issues as part of some homogenous ‘left’. It simply is not the case. Many environmentalists are leaving the ‘new’ left just as the Animal Rights folks did 15 years ago(once the left started branding them ‘racists’ for daring to change their focus to animal issues in non western countries).

      We’re not all groupthink types, mate. Some of us have nuanced views. Just because I eat tofu doesn’t mean I have white guilt. And just because I respect women doesn’t mean I want to open the borders.

    • Erick says:

      01:00pm | 09/04/11

      Fair enough, Sam.

      I can only say that I use terms like “the Left” broadly, to indicate general tendencies. There are, of course, many individuals who do not fall under such general categories.

      However, what I post are concise Internet comments, not academic theses. So in order to keep it brief, I need to simplify some things. If I wrote 2,000 word essays establishing all the parameters and exceptions, nobody would read them and my points would be lost.

      Compromise is the way of the world.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      05:57am | 09/04/11

      Hi Erick,

      How about a picture??  I personally think a picture is worth a thousand words, no offence!!  I am truly sorry that I do not care about all the things you claim to be, after all the comments, you have made time and time again about the other half of the population.  To me you come across as some one who is very narrow minded just to say the least!!

      I personally think you will not get far in life if you do not change your views and your tolerance levels.  A columnist?  May be, if you like to say awful things just to upset and bring the worst out in other people.  I have noticed that you are mostly the first person to comment on almost anything!!  Do you a have a job or an occupation, that is what I really like to know for sure!!  And also does that mean that you actually know about anything and everything , like you claim to be??

      And the very best regards to your editors.

    • james milton says:

      12:03pm | 09/04/11

      Why should he change his ‘tolerance levels’? It’s tolerance for everything, whether it hurts or harms us, that has messed up the western world. People used to stand for something, now they are frightened to for fear of being labelled ‘intolerant’.. or ‘misogynistic’ .. or ‘racist’.

      And that’s why Erick is so popular, he is not afraid of being called those things.

    • chucky says:

      02:32pm | 10/04/11

      How’s the intolerance demonstrated in NESLIHAN KUROSAWA’s message?! Hypocrisy such as this is all too typical of the average self-absorbed leftard.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      06:08pm | 10/04/11

      Hi Chucky,

      After all we do choose to live in a democratic society, we are all entitled to our own opinions, right??  Rather than discussing the obvious meaning of intolerance, I would like to ask you the true meaning of tolerance!!  To me tolerance can mean a lot of things, it applies to everything we do in our daily lives.  From our jobs to our personal or private lives.  Being tolerant of others who seem to be very different to ourselves is a very good example.

      May be just like you mentioned, we do live in a hypocritical world!! What makes us different from others in a lot ways, can also make us unique!!  What counts at the end of the day for me personally is respecting different points of view, while trying to convey our message across to the world at large!!  I personally do not choose to analyse life too much & try to change others.  Because that is truly impossible and a total waste of time.  At the end of the day “do you all want to be right or happy”??

    • woolycrow says:

      12:59pm | 09/04/11

      I think Erick’s just confused and doesn’t really know what he believes in.  Some of his utterings a just total far right wing nonsense, The irony is that, in countries where ruling groups share some of Erick’s beliefs. Erick just wouldn’t be able to share his views with others on Forum’s like Punch.  I respect his right top present a dissenting view - I have haven’t yet read anything from Erick that I would agree with.

    • John says:

      02:39pm | 10/04/11

      Far-right don’t have platform. Since the far-left mainstream media won’t give them a platform.  Western society since WWII has been condition and manipulated into thinking to the far-left. This is why Atheism, Homosexuality, Multiculturalism, Mass immigration, Feminism, Anti-christianity, Anti-white sentiment has increased. The Far-left even since the 1900’s from the minority movements with Communist Russia, have immigrated to the UK, France, Germany and US and have subverted and brainwashed entire populations to their cause, using the media, international finance and the governments. Basically the entire western society has built a constitution, a frame work based on far-left idea’s. This why we have mass immigration, anti-white sentiment, anti-christian sentiment running through our media and education systems. The Far-left occupy the west and then claim a free society, which is the not the case. They slowly and slowly brainwashed our society into following their ideals. We are an occupied people. Far-right view are the truthful expression of western society. The far-left is foreign expression that does not exist in the souls of the European spirit. When i went to Europe in a few years ago and noticed the mas immigration in London, Paris and Netherlands. My natural reaction was that of disgust. I knew that there was something wrong. I came the conclusion that far-left took over Europe. When i went to Spain Italy and Portugal i sensed more of nationalist spirit a more united tribal people. Where the north of Europe had the leftist disease of self destruction.

    • john says:

      02:15pm | 09/04/11

      That’s because your mind has been railroaded by the sum of your experiences that you choose to agree with.

      It helps to always ask yourself ” why does one see it that way?”

      Then the ‘closeness’ to the truth reveals itself somewhere in the middle.

    • stephen says:

      05:59pm | 09/04/11

      No, my eyes see outside that is is a clear day, therefore it is clear.
      My mind has to define it.
      My experience, or my memory of a clear day, makes a meaning of it.
      Memory and experience are similar.
      (William Blake would disagree.)
      But my mind is now Modern, i.e. at the present only.
      This is the only difference between imagination and consciousness.
      (A syllogism is needed, but my laptop does not have the symbols.)

    • Betty Martin says:

      05:11pm | 09/04/11

      There are two weak points in E’s claims.

      First, that he “doesn’t usually write about himself”. Fall over laughing territory there. Though he probably believes it and will almost certainly a) claim its true and b) paint any disagreement as “personal attack”.

      Second, he has an opinion on almost everything. Don’t we all. His just happen to be poorly researched, poorly argued but stridently put. This he calls “articulate”. Perhaps, in the “disjointed” sense.

      As for his claim to have been a Left activist, oh, indeed. Were’nt we all. It’d be interesting to see the evidence. One of the most threadbare pseudo-claims on The Punch.

    • Luke says:

      10:21am | 11/04/11

      I’ve followed a fair bit of erick over a long time… I’m not a diehard fan… i am simply not the net enough to be one… but i honestly feel what you have written doesnt reflect his writings at all…
      1. His research seems just as good as the people who comment on him
      2. Your idea that he “wasnt” a left activist is just as poorly researched as what you insist him to be
      3. internet commentors DO get personal more often than properly philosophical

    • Betty Martin says:

      02:02pm | 11/04/11

      Kindly don’t put words in my mouth.
      1. Can’t help your there, if that’s your view.  I differ.

      2. E made the claim to have been a Left activist. I have no idea whether he was or not, nor did I suggest otherwise. There’s no evidence.

      It is, as stated, one of the false ploys most often used here to dress up a position.  As *he* made the claim, it’s entirely up to *him* to back that with some reliable material.

      3. E claimed “doesn’t usually” write about himself. His claim. His problem. You’re right.

      Lastly, I know nothing about him as such. I’ve said nothing personal about him. No need. 

      I have simply adressed several of his points, in pretty much the same way that he made them, and found them weak. 

      His posts frequently are. Weak on verifiable fact. Stridently put.

      Now he he has started to dress them up with high falutin psycho-babble stick-ons. A new frill, but as threadbare as his suit of old.

      Meh. Stuff to do.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter