Politicians are severely testing the patience of Australians on climate change.

Progress as slow as evolution. The Climate Institute campaign.

It has taken more than a decade of wrangling for politicians to finally deliver some detailed policy to the floor of Parliament. Yet, when action appears close enough to touch, there is further delay or prospects of more unconditional handouts to big polluters.

An Auspoll survey taken last week shows that only 13 per cent think Australia’s Parliament is moving too fast on addressing climate change. Around half believe progress is too slow and only a solid, sceptical core of seven per cent thinks we should do nothing at all.

And despite the fear campaigns from big polluters and renewed noises from those challenging the science, a very solid majority wants the Coalition to get on with passing the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) legislation.

The Auspoll survey of 1400 Australians asked whether the Liberals should support or oppose the CPRS. Seventy eight per cent thought they should back it, virtually unmoved since May’s seventy seven per cent outcome.

In each case the numbers are stronger for women and those under 34, key segments of swinging voters.

To better understand people’s concerns and hopes, The Climate Institute, and our partners in union, welfare and environment groups, has been talking with communities around Australia.  In areas like the La Trobe and Gladstone there is a recognition that high polluting industries must change. They know they won’t remain competitive without new technologies and improved efficiency.

There has been an unprecedented campaign of deception from big polluters and others seeking special treatment or to block climate action portraying such action as a “jobs killer”.  But the reality is very different.

All credible economic models say we that we can grow new clean energy jobs and industries as we significantly reduce carbon pollution. Indeed, the Minerals Council of Australia’s CEO, Mitch Hooke acknowledged as much during a recent Senate Inquiry hearing when he said: “we are not suggesting this is scorched earth. We know we are going to continue to grow.”

Perhaps more importantly, the non-modeled real world is turning to clean energy. In 2008 for the first time, investments in clean energy sources outstripped investments in fossil fuel technologies. And worldwide, the renewable energy sector already employs around 2.3 million people – more than the total number employed directly in oil and gas.

Australians can sense this opportunity. In a February poll on whether tackling climate change creates opportunities for jobs and new investments in clean energy (solar, wind, geothermal), 75% agreed or strongly agreed.

In recognition of this public frustration and thirst for action, labour, welfare, environment and research groups came together to launch a National Clean Energy Jobs Campaign at the weekend. This is multi-media and grassroots campaign supported by The Climate Institute, ACTU, Australian Council of Social Service, Australian Conservation Foundation and the WWF.

It’s a serious but cheeky campaign calling on “dinosaurs” in Parliament and in business to “evolve” by showing leadership on climate action to grow hundreds of thousands of clean energy jobs as well as building a clean energy economy in which we can all be employed.

Our groups are calling on politicians to strengthen and pass the CPRS and renewable energy legislation now before Parliament and to take further action in areas like energy efficiency and providing dependable financing for clean technology solutions in Australia and in developing countries.

The campaign, which will run to the December UN climate negotiations in Copenhagen and beyond, is also urging Australians to help their politicians “evolve”.  We’ll be visiting key communities as well as publishing more research and policy solutions.

This unusual alliance of groups is motivated by the urgent importance not only of avoiding the enormous social, environmental and economic costs of the climate crisis.  It is also motivated by the missed opportunities of inaction.  Australia has one of the most polluting and energy wasting economies in the developed world.  If we don’t shift we risk being left behind.

There are challenges in making the shift but we are confident that Australia can make a just, fair and decisive shift to a clean energy economy.

With urgent climate action we can not only grow jobs and be competitive in the global clean energy economy, but cooperative in achieving an effective global climate agreement - imperative to both our environmental and economic security.

The message to politicians and polluters, many of whom remain a reptilian stride behind public opinion, is clear: “It’s time to evolve”.

Most commented

41 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Glenn Kelly says:

      11:34am | 11/08/09

      While 70% of a poll of 1400 people think that the government is not moving fast enough, my question would be, ‘how many of that 70% have actually read the Policy document, and further how many can explain even the basic points of the ETS’. My Guess 5% would grasp the complexity of the ETS, and maybe 10% could explain the basics. The problem with poll data is that it simply shows the majorities ignorance towards government policy. I’ve read the document and I’m hard pressed to explain it to friends and family.

      Does this mean I’m a supporter of the Liberal alternative, no. Both are have the problem of being Political whipping posts instead of Environmental policy. Just as Trade was the 70-80’s, ETS is now the topic the left and right pound each other with.

      CPRS, ETS, carbon trading, as the name changes to meet the focus group testing the less this becomes a issues facing our planet and morphs into a sound bite we’re all sick of hearing about. Which I think is a worry because we need to move, not because of climate change, but because we can. We have the technology to reduce the impact humans have on this planet, we have the technology to reduce the energy we consume, the water we pollute and the air we breath.

      We have the technology, we have the ability now we need a leader to step up, explain exactly what and why and how and put aside the political attacks.

    • Dan says:

      11:42am | 11/08/09

      I tell you right now what is going to happen. The politicians will run around looking busy to try and keep us all happy, but not actually do anything that will make a shred of difference.

      Lets face it, the only way we’ll get any action or new investment in alternatives to fossil fuels is in about a year or five when economies start to recover and the demand for oil starts to outstrip supply again and the oil price rises drastically again to the point were alternatives are a viable option again.

    • Chris says:

      11:58am | 11/08/09

      Maybe its time the Moral Superiority campaign on climate change is set aside and some practical evidence sought that the actions proposed will make a difference to the climate. I suggest that the destruction of livelihoods and families destroyed by unemployment, the stagnation of the economy for decades, can only be justified by very strong benefits. What are they, and where is the benefit-cost analysis that shows its worthwhile?
      And if you think this is an unreasonable demand, ask yourself why you think that!
      It could soon be time for a new John Kerr to do the right thing for Australia.

    • Zeta says:

      12:00pm | 11/08/09

      I don’t understand your ads. Dinosaurs didn’t evolve. Their bones were buried underground by God to trick the unfaithful into beleiving Satan’s lies about evolution. Clearly, by associating yourself with this Satanic lie, you’re reminding the Godly that Climate Change is just the Lord’s way of telling us Rapture is coming, and we should start praying harder. If He so wishes it, he can change the climate back, so Prayer is a far more viable option than heathen advertisements featuring your Lie-Dinosaurs.

      Now, assuming of course, that most Australians are ungodly heathens who won’t prayer hard enough for the climate to be changed back; why should we trust you and your Climate Institute to lobby on our behalf? You were involved with the Make Poverty History campaign, and I’m betting you didn’t get any lobbyist’s success fees for that one, since last time I checked, poverty was not history (and a good thing too, since poverty is God’s way of telling us who isn’t Saved).

      The only person Australians should trust to change the climate, is Tony Abbott, who is widely beleived to have the power to change weather patterns by smirking at them.

    • formersnag says:

      12:09pm | 11/08/09

      An ETS, CPRS, is exactly what Sir Humphrey Appleby would propose to fix global warming.

      It has all the elements of the best possible way to, look, like, you are doing something, while actually, doing nothing, and bankrupting us all, as well.

      John Connor and all the others should be put on trial, for economic treason, just for talking about this criminal conspiracy.

    • David C says:

      12:17pm | 11/08/09

      I dont understand why all the pressure, if we dont do anything before Copenhagen what difference will it make, and if we do what difference will it make (clue - zero)
      It would appear the only reason to go early is to make some symbolic gesture and to keep climate coalition-ites happy. Please go and do that with someone elses money/jobs/lifestyle. 
      By the way how is all this going to be monitored, audited and poiiced?

    • elhombre says:

      12:19pm | 11/08/09

      More self serving drivel from those in the pay of big green. The tide is turning against you anthropogenic global warming psychopaths and the more your delusions are brought to light the more hysterical you are getting. You want to destroy our economy for no appreciable gain. That’s treason in my book.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      12:19pm | 11/08/09

      A carbon tax on australian domestic industries and imports into australia would be so much better. Otherwise you are just shifting jobs and pollution overseas when the multinationals shift operations.

    • watty says:

      12:25pm | 11/08/09

      What a heap of bollocks from the Combined Dinosaurs of Australia.

      The Australian Consevation Foundation, the ACTU, ACOSS, WWF, the Climate Institute.  Possibly the biggest anti-development lobby group formed in Australia.

      If as this mob have been claiming for years “the science is all in” then there would be no debate but any science is never “all in”.It keeps being challenged and changed.

      Tryin to figure out which one of the dinosaurs in the ad. is Sharon Burrows

    • Charles says:

      12:39pm | 11/08/09

      More drivel from the ill-informed adherents of AGW.  One can only wonder what the question was that they asked those people in the poll.  This is a scheme which will benefit bankers, lawyers, accountants and other similar spivs, charlatans, and rent-seekers, and nobody else.  As well, since CO2 is a colourless and odourless gas, how is anybody going to know if we have reduced its amount in the atmosphere or not?  So, for all those saying we will clean up the planet if we do it anyway, ask yourself what do you think you will be seeing; thinner than usual air?

    • Chris says:

      01:10pm | 11/08/09

      Thankyou Glen Kelly you are spot on.

    • Joe says:

      01:11pm | 11/08/09

      The ETS won’t cool the world. It will only line the pockets of those from orgnaistions that have sprung up like this so called “Climate Institute” and Macquarie and other bankers. Turnbull’s alternative sounds slightly more palatable but still nonscence and Wong isn’t about to talk any scense here on this anyway. It is just a wedge for Rudd and Labor, they aren’t serious about doing anything. And Turnbull is falling in the trap - trying to get left/green votes on this issue.

      A new tax on all Australians won’t save the world. But it will benefit countries like China that don’t give a damn about this nonsense and will love their competitors willingly crippling themselves..

    • Nick says:

      01:13pm | 11/08/09

      Way to stay on topic, Zeta.

      *rolls eyes*

    • jim says:

      01:20pm | 11/08/09

      I can’t understand who in their right mind, would sign a contract to pay more for what we use normally, and have the big polluters get more out of it.

      The current CPRS is almost like a Fitness First contract. You get excited with getting fit, and the minute you sign it, you’re locked into it ... even when theres better deals that are later developed.

      I hope people discuss this, and hopefully we’ll find a few conferences that explain in Lemans terms what it all means.

    • Waz says:

      01:29pm | 11/08/09

      I’m one of those who can’t honestly tell if this latest batch of legislation is worth anything. I do appreciate Senator Steven Fielding’s efforts though, he seems to be at least trying to do what we pay them for, in trying to satisfy himself on the science and rationale behind the ETS. I didn’t vote for the guy by the way… but read his website where he puts his written questions to Penny Wong & dept, and her dept’s almost unintelligible reply. It also attaches a critique of that reply by qualified scientists. One of the questions was very simple. CO2 has gone up, yet temperatures haven’t moved beyond historical trends - in fact in the last decade or so they’ve gone down, if anything. So he simply asks where is the link? And there is genuine scientific debate about that. If there wasn’t, there would be no argument against ETS at all.
      Although I do agree with others that pollution is something humanity must address, I struggle to see the bang for the buck in this proposal… and I think most others who take an open mind and inform on the debate (as opposed to feelings) do think likewise.
      I’d like to see all countries do something. But all of them. Especially China and India, where so many normal days the air looks like a bushfire is raging as often you can barely see a block away. Personally I think Australia’s biggest bang for buck - and in this we would dramatically slash all sorts of pollution, not just minor increments of overall CO2 - is to start using nuclear power to replace coal fired baseload power. Wind and Solar are good, and getting better, but still aren’t in a bulls roar of covering that baseload supply we all rely on.

    • Waz says:

      01:34pm | 11/08/09

      Nick, Zeta is either the funniest writer & satirist anywhere on Punch, or a complete lunatic… probably both! I had a good laugh too.

    • Joel B1 says:

      01:47pm | 11/08/09

      CC or AGW as it used be known before it got colder is over-rated.
      My spouse attended a CC conference just this morning. It’s going to boast agriculture in our area and fix a “dry” spot, and that’s the worst case scenario!

      Bring it on…

    • Rationalist says:

      01:54pm | 11/08/09

      Nothing Australia can do will classify as “action on climate change” since we consist of 1.5% of global emissions.

    • Steve says:

      01:55pm | 11/08/09

      To all those advocates of the “green nirvana Jobs” growing Hemp shirts and knitting Photo Voltaic Cells, I would say one word – SPAIN. They fell into the “renewable Energy” black hole a couple of years ahead of us and now their only export is Jobs and unemployment is 20%, twice the EU average. Problem is the same as Earth Hour, it gives some the warm fuzzies sitting the dark for an hour but gets a bit boring if you have to do it all the time, secondly it does nothing to reduce co2, power Generation is not that quick to respond. More important renewable is not base load and all the Windmills in the UK generate less than 1/3 of the power output of a single power station and cost twice that to build. You guys are dreaming…

    • Dave says:

      02:07pm | 11/08/09

      I for one am certainly sick of all the dithering on climate change.  Lets just accept the fact that in climate terms Australia is completely insignificant and stop trying to be a footnote on a presentation in someone else’s debate.  The rush to get it in before the mystical copenhagen meeting is a complete farce.  Besides which all this nonsense that if you don’t support the CPRS means you don’t care about the environment is just fanciful.  Let me put it another way.  If you do support the government’s CPRS all you are saying is that you don’t realise how little impact it will have in environmental terms and have absolutely no understanding of how markets or derivatives work.

    • jimmy of Melbourne says:

      02:09pm | 11/08/09

      Yes, the public are fed-up with dithering from government on climate change, despite it being a key election promise of the Rudd government. We need to go to Copenhagen with a strong set of domestic climate policies that can inspire other nations. From a purely selfish point of view - Australia and other Pacific nations are the most vulnerable to climate impacts - several of our Asia Pacific neighbors have already been forced to shift populations as a result of rising sea levels. As Sharon Burrow says - there will be no jobs on a dead planet!

    • Phil says:

      02:09pm | 11/08/09

      The current government was elected with two mandates (or three if you count saying the word “sorry”).

      1. Get rid of workchoices.
      2. Acknowledge climate change and take some action.

      In some respect, it’s actually irrelevant what the government plans to do, or whether it will work.  But they were elected to give it their best shot.

      The opposition, by needlessly standing in the way of a clear mandate, are not only completely out of step with the majority of voters, but they are setting up the preconditions for a double dissolution.

      Turnbull lacks the judgement and insight to understand that not only can he not win this battle, but it will it will cost him the war.

    • Ian F says:

      02:11pm | 11/08/09

      Climate change is happening and the scientists have been saying this for 30 years.  Nothing good will come of unmitigated climate change as extreme weather events will become the norm.

      Every time we hold off on doing something is another day lost to prevent the worst impacts of climate change.  And every time we hold off on doing something is another opportunity lost to begin investing in the industries and technologies that will lead to a low carbon economy.

      As the ACF and Greens Senator Christine Milne says it’s time for the dinosaurs to evolve and vote for action on climate change.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      02:36pm | 11/08/09

      “...despite the fear campaigns from big polluters and renewed noises from those challenging the science…”

      Of course the over-the-top apocalyptic fear campaigns by and on behalf of organisations such as yours are permissable because they are educational right?

      “...The message to politicians and polluters, many of whom remain a reptilian stride behind public opinion, is clear: “It’s time to evolve”...”

      Isn’t it ironic that you choose to invoke those species which have endured multi-millenia of ‘climate change’ and survived virtually unchanged from their prehistoric ancestors.

      Their adaptibility to the always changing climate should be a source of comfort to you that mankind will do just fine whatever happens, if anything and most likely nothing.

      “...And worldwide, the renewable energy sector already employs around 2.3 million people – more than the total number employed directly in oil and gas…”

      This would suggest the renewables sector is an inefficient and lazy bureaucracy unlike the vital, well run and fiscally prudent oil & gas industry.

      Was that what you were trying to convey?

      “...The Climate Institute, ACTU, Australian Council of Social Service, Australian Conservation Foundation and the WWF…”

      “...This unusual alliance of groups…”

      Now you’re just being silly.

    • Sherlock says:

      03:07pm | 11/08/09

      Yep let’s go. I mean look at the two major economies that already have an ETS.

      1. Europe - now an economic basket case
      2. California - One decision away from bankruptcy.

      Hey don’t let that stop you. Establish your ETS now. Don’t wait for the USA (who’ll never get any actual useful scheme through their senate) or China (who can’t believe our stupidity) to agree to do anything themselves. Don’t wait for Copenhagen that would be way too sensible.

      This isn’t a matter of belief in climate change. This isn’t an environmental scheme it’s a political one. One more wealth redistribution scheme from the ALP’s department of class warfare.

    • wake up Rudd says:

      03:34pm | 11/08/09

      Climate change should not result in more expensiver power options for Australian households. I find it of grave concern this govt is intending to raise the cost of living while handing coal companies millions to mislead usinto the clean coal farce. Coal should be relegated to the history books. We need to stop exporting it for profit and use alternative fuels. Nuclear energy would be far more advantageous than coal.

    • Steve says:

      03:35pm | 11/08/09

      Let’s get a few thing straight, he climate we have is nothing compared to what was there in ancient history. Try Ice cover nearly to the equator, where the only liquid water was around volcanic vents. 40,000 years ago there was so much ice over North America that the ocean was 15Km further out to sea. The English Channel was just a creek and Indiginous Ozzies walked here from Africa. When the Romans built the first London villiag it was on a river delta that was flooded by the sea during the roman warming. Choral limits its growth to the shallows for heat and light yet coral atolls can be layers of coral 800 Mtrs deep so at some stage in history the sea was that low. The sea is rising in Netherlands and SE England over 6mts in 5000 years, but falling in Scotland Finland and Iceland. Not because of any change in water level but for the same reason Everest is 3 mtrs taller than when Hillary and Nasi Goring climed it in the 50s; Tectonic movement. We live on a dynamic planet and sometimes the sea is not rising some Choral atoll islands are sinking.

    • Jim says:

      03:55pm | 11/08/09

      Bertrand Russell once stated “the prblem with the world is that fools and fanatics are so sure of themselves, whilst wiser people are so full of doubts”. One might hope that the climate change alarmists could ponder a little on this.

    • Steve says:

      04:09pm | 11/08/09

      So over listening to the deniers trying to convince people their warped view of the science is accurate.  Already too much time has been wasted on rubbish arguments while the rest of the world is moving to clean energy.  I reckon it’s about time Australia stopped wasting time and did something to tackle climate change.  The Liberals are just completely out of control when they won’t support legislation that would put into place a scheme very similar to the one they still have as their official policy!

      Even if the CPRS is a piece of junk it’s something to start the ball rolling.  I’d much prefer to see something happen that starts reducing our emissions and creating jobs than watch our planet sink further into the climate change abyss.

    • Brian B says:

      04:24pm | 11/08/09

      Penny Wong’s advisors couldn’t give an intelligent answer to three plain language questions submitted by Stephen Fielding.

      What hope would they have of understanding complex science matter involving any change to the climate?

      We are being conned.

    • PaulW says:

      04:24pm | 11/08/09

      People support the government’s position because the government, and people like John Connor, perpetuate the lie that the ETS will make any difference to climate change.

      Be honest with them and say the ETS is a huge tax that will hurt the poor the hardest and watch how quickly support crumbles.

    • David of Elwood says:

      04:58pm | 11/08/09

      Steve, if the CPRS was going to reduce emissions and create jobs, then even deniers like me would support it. But it doesn’t do either. It’s a political solution, not an environmental one. It’s more about ‘Big Green’ than the environment we all care about.

      CPRS = Fools gold!

    • Bruce says:

      05:11pm | 11/08/09

      Its fine to say we need an ETS. However, if you were to ask most people in the street, they would NOT HAVE A CLUE WHAT IT IS,  or for that matter even care. There are also many other dummies out there that are only supporting it, or against it, because of their political persuasion,  and have know idea what it means. As I have NO faith in what politicians tell us, I would suggest if we are to really understand what an ETS is, maybe an independant scientific team could publish a paper detailing real facts, so we can make our own decisions. NOT WHAT POLITICIANS TELL US.

    • Steve says:

      05:27pm | 11/08/09

      The biggest problem with this debate is it is now so polarised that there is no middle ground. You have (the end is near) alarmist and the (Holocaust) deniers throwing scientist at each other and all observers are so confused that you can tell the difference between science fact and hair brained distorted opinion. The CPRS (CRAPS) has nothing to do with Changing the Climate. It is a tax on air that will be bigger than the GST. Never get between a large bucket of money and a politician. The alarmist can not point to a single bit of science that shows that an ETS anywhere will reduce co2 or have the slightest effect on temperatures. Australia reductions of 20% would translate to a reduction of 0.0007549 ppm co2 on a planet scale. Literally 2/5 of stuff all. Great idea

    • ANDIKA says:

      05:35pm | 11/08/09

      Re Chris @ 1158am.
      Chris’ comments are spot on.
      What a heap of Dinosaur crap your campaign is. Green jobs galore! Dinosaurshit! The only certainty of implementing an ETS is this – Tens of thousands of real jobs will shift overseas and this is the cost Australians must pay so people like you can occupy the moral high ground.  You do realise that until the Chinese and the Indians follow suit there will be FA real benefit to the Environment?
      Implementing an ETS is like those dropkicks who believe if you do nothing but sit-ups, you’ll end up with a set of wash board abs. Spot reduction exercise doesn’t work nor will any reduction here help the environment.
      Now the biggest anti-capitalist lobby group in Australia has been formed. Comprised of Kremlinist members including The Australian Conservation Foundation, the ACTU, ACOSS, WWF and the Climate Institute. Now there’s a real go forward bunch of socialists, who thanks to Rudd & Co, are flourishing like weeds.

    • Anthony says:

      05:44pm | 11/08/09

      So, more people are employed in renewable energy worldwide than in oil and gas? But yet the great majority of electricity being generated is not from renewable energy. That goes to show right there how much more expensive ‘renewable’ energy is. It is fact that coal is the cheapest way to generate electricity. Living will become more expensive without cheap power.

      And then there is the little issue of that we are actually not causing catastrophic global warming, so all this ETS business is one hell of a waste of time and money. The evidence is very contrary to what the global warming preachers preach.

    • Socrates says:

      06:43pm | 11/08/09

      “There has been an unprecedented campaign of deception.”

      Well, at least we can agree about that.  Nearly all of that deception has come from people of very ordinary ability who are making a very, very good living as the taxpayer-funded self appointed high priests of the new carbon religion.

      The carbonistas want to ruin our economy and make everybody poor and miserable, except themselves of course.

    • formersnag says:

      07:54pm | 11/08/09

      The only Criminals in favour of the ETS, CPRS, are the loony left bureaucrats, dreaming about how, they will waste, the taxes they collect.

      Or the raving right wall street traders, dreaming about all the bonuses, they can make, trading in carbon default swaps, derivative forestry futures, shares in timbercorp, great southern, etc. BTW isn’t that how, the whole GFC thing started?

      The only people worse, would be the journalists/mass media types, telling us we should cop all this crap. They probably don’t, even, understand, why we don’t want to pay, for the lies, they keep telling us.

    • therub says:

      09:51am | 12/08/09

      we can all log off, unless our leaders make good decisions at Copenhagen this Dec. So regardless of ETS or the outside chance that politicians might actually DO something, if this meeting does not agree a low carbon future for us all in order to keep global temperature increase to under 2 degrees C then we can all shut up shop. Simple really ....

    • wow gold says:

      11:12am | 17/10/12

      Hi, I just wanted to say, you’re wrong. Your article doesn’t make any sense.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter