Unless you were lucky enough to be of nightclubbing age in the 1970s it has never been cool to wear white leather shoes. Despite being akin to wearing a large sign that says “I’m a tool”, this hideous footwear has had something of a resurgence in trendy nightclubs thanks to metrosexuality.

Not cool

But after a decade at the cutting edge of cool, metrosexuals have been given one clear signal they may have to go back to being ordinary blokes. Nightclub promoter Scott Mellor has chalked a line in the pavement outside a new club event in Melbourne that debuts on Friday. Beyond it, metrosexuals shall not pass.

Anthropologists might be tempted to attribute this to a socio-collectivist and culturo-genetic realisation that men are not capable of understanding manicures and shopping to the extent required to live a truly metrosexual life. But most would say metrosexuality was like platform shoes for blokes – a stupid idea in the first place – and besides, since David Beckham first dyed his tips blonde women have been clamouring that they prefer real men.

The event details from the club’s website are worth quoting at some length:

No snakeskin shoes, No Ed f***ing Hardy, No numbered polos, no axl rose bandanas. Spread the word and bring the party. Upstairs at Ding Dong. Check your life pre entry.
NO METROSEXUAL ATTIRE
NO AGGRESSION
NO ASSHOLES
(No tragic pout photos)

Now the general law in most Australian states is that it’s discriminate against someone on grounds of sex, pregnancy, age, race, sexuality, religion or disability. Mellor is exploiting a neat loophole: there’s nothing to stop discrimination against someone on the grounds that they’re an up-themself poser douchebag.

This is one loophole that doesn’t need to be closed. In a sign that this might be part of a trend, one of Australia’s best new restaurants has a not dissimilar set of house rules. Before you get to the food in the menus at Neil Perry’s Rockpool Bar & Grill in Sydney you’re warned against getting snotty and demanding with the staff. “Check your attitude with your coat at the door,” it says.

Metrosexuality was only starting to gain a real foothold when it was lampooned in the 2001 movie Zoolander. Arguably Ben Stiller’s finest movie, it showed men who paid too much attention to their image were a rich source of ridicule.

My own opinion of metrosexuality through the years has been massively inconsistent. Despite scoffing at the awful pretentiousness of the whole phenomenon and ridiculing my friends I did have my hair dyed blonde in Thailand in 2002 and have occasionally worn polos with big numbers on them. These days I spend $45 on my haircut which I suspect is the annual barber budget of many Australian men whose loaves look just fine.

Most tellingly, last Christmas the secret Santa in work got me a metrosexual styling kit which I accepted with much mirth only to slink home and to have a look at how good the tweezers were. (Let me make it clear I’ve never had a manscape, gotten a fake tan or worn my collar up.)

The trouble for metrosexuals now is that what began, like most fashion trends, as an original, slightly ironic and fringe lifestyle choice went mainstream. While the original metros would put in a short appearance at a club before retiring by 10pm (can’t miss the beauty sleep), trendy bars are overrun with great-smelling, manicured and buff straight dudes whose conversation moves seamlessly between interior design and Collingwood’s chances next season.

If this is the beginning of the end for metrosexuality it’s a win for the all-consuming passion of Australians for real equality, the same passion that loathes idle hands and anyone with more money than sense. Because to be a true metrosexual you need a specific combination of two things most men in middle Australia don’t have much of: time and cash to burn.

Declaring that people with too much money and time on their hands are unwelcome at a club is a classic expression of the Australian society’s unrelenting pursuit of equality. It’s a way of saying the boundaries have been pushed too far. You’ve had your fun, metros. Time to put away the moisturiser.

Or maybe it’s just a really clever way of getting women looking for a real man in the door of a club.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

42 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Dianne says:

      07:00am | 17/11/09

      whoa Colgo! Nothing wrong with a man who takes care of himself. Getting rid of nose hairs, or a monobrow is a bonus. You don’t have to look feminine to be a metrosexual. I like dating or ‘hanging out’ with a man who smells nice and doesn’t have dead skin hanging off his face. Is the use of moisturiser the sign of a metrosexual? If so, then yes, give me one any day.

      With regards to fashion, I don’t like white shoes, but I also dislike bogan singlets, southern cross tattoos, and flipflops. Really, give me a man that wears a nice shirt, takes pride in his shoes, wears some raybans, holds open the door and can maintain a conversation that does not just revolve around the footy and maybe even knows who Alain de Botton is.

      Is that a metrosexual? If you know of one that is single can you forward me his number?

    • Oh Dear it's ugly time again says:

      07:05am | 17/11/09

      Tight jeans and leather soled shoes make it impossible to conduct oneself in an unpleasant and unsocial manner let alone participate in physical activity such as fisticuffs as the former are restrictive and the latter slippery.
      I would have thought the amount of alcohol poured down one’s gullet or the number of unpartnered ugly blokes who cruise into a jealous state may have a greater impact on the physical participation in less salubriuos activities than intended by the owners of nightclubs.

    • Julia says:

      07:24am | 17/11/09

      Well said. I found the little b*st*rds were unnerving with their nails better kept than mine (a clear indication I did more typing or they had a better manicurist).

    • Peter Thornton says:

      07:27am | 17/11/09

      I endorse this thread and every discriminatory sentiment contained within.

    • murray says:

      07:37am | 17/11/09

      Brilliant.  Nothing against people who look after themselves, but a night out could certainly do with a reduction of aggresive metrobogans as described by Mellor.

    • Steve Smith says:

      07:40am | 17/11/09

      Some free publicity for a night club opening rather than an article about discrimination… the promoter has definitely earned his stripes.

    • Maq says:

      07:42am | 17/11/09

      @Dianne - I just finished The Consolations of Philosophy. Unfortunately I don’t have any Raybands to compliment my nice shirt.

      Maybe next time.

    • Butch says:

      07:46am | 17/11/09

      Does this mean I can finally have my hair-straightener back, Paul?

    • Graham S says:

      08:01am | 17/11/09

      Alain de Botton - Is he that Rayban wearing Collingwood footballer??

    • Lavendra Selva says:

      08:08am | 17/11/09

      Nothing wrong with a pair of white shoes - I have two, I have one pair here at work just across the floor from where you sit Paul.  I might bring it around so you can try them on…....! Also is that an armani suit you have on today mate?

    • Helen says:

      08:28am | 17/11/09

      Yes! Metrosexual men please leave all other premises too…and stop toting your briefcase behind you on wheels, like it’s so heavy your finely toned gym arms can’t carry it! and learn to change a tyre and just, for goodness sake, man-up….in all areas.

    • Zeta says:

      08:33am | 17/11/09

      “The gyms you go to are crowded with guys trying to look like men, as if being a man means looking the way a sculptor or an art director says.” - Tyler Durden has the final word on metrosexuality.

    • daft punk friday says:

      08:33am | 17/11/09

      they did the same at ric’s bar in brisbane, keep the glass toss the retard.

    • dodge says:

      08:37am | 17/11/09

      Does anyone see the irony of the punch running a raft of pieces on how women suffer under men’s constant judgement of their appearance, to then post a piece like this

    • Zeta says:

      08:49am | 17/11/09

      @ dodge - you’re mangling the definition of irony, and assuming that the Punch has an agenda to push.

      That, and everyone hates metro scum.

    • Paul Colgan

      Paul Colgan says:

      09:02am | 17/11/09

      This isn’t an argument against basic hygiene. The issue may warrant further exploration, perhaps in list form:

      In: Soap, even slightly fancy ones that smell of fruit
      Out: Any product with the words “cocoa” or “butter” on the label

      Other suggestions?

    • Ben says:

      09:14am | 17/11/09

      In: A quick once over in the mirror on the way out to check your appearance.
      Out: Not being able to walk past a mirror or shop window without checkng yourself out, and spending more time in front of a mirror than your wife / girlfriend

    • shabangabang says:

      09:43am | 17/11/09

      @Colgo - anything that smells of fruit will attract fruit. In that situation metrosexuals are not relevant.
      Anyway,
      In: Aftershave Balm
      Out: Yogurt on the face and cucumber on the eyes.
      In: sqeezing blackeads
      Out: those silly pads you put on your nose
      In: nail clippers
      Out: someone doing it for you

    • Butch says:

      09:44am | 17/11/09

      I would laugh at some of these comments but it would give me unsightly lines.

    • Zeta says:

      09:44am | 17/11/09

      In: Aviators.

      Out: J-Lo sunglasses.

      In: Scowling

      Out: Pouting

      In: Beards

      Out: Soul patches.

      In: black, white, gray, dark gray, variations on denim.

      Out: Pastels.

      In: Going to a boxing gym

      Out: Personal training by a guy with tips and tighter legs than your girlfriend’s

      In: Exotic beers

      Out: Exotic cocktails

      In: Getting in a legitimate fist fight over an issue you feel passionately about, while sober enough to walk a straight line, and helping your opponent up afterwards.

      Out: King hitting / glassing someone because they looked at you queer, which is legimate because you probably look a bit queer.

      In: pubic hair

      Out: nose hair.

      In: The phrase, ‘you look really pretty today.’

      Out: The phrase, ‘I look really pretty today.’

      In: Being reasonably healthy

      Out: Reading Men’s Health

      In: Keeping everything you could possibly need for any situation in only two jeans pockets.

      Out: Man bags.

      In: Any shoe your Dad’s generation wore (Cuban heels, winklepickers, tasseled brothel creepers, cowboy boots) worn ironically, and in either black or brown .

      Out: Pointy toed fairy shoes.

    • AdamC says:

      09:50am | 17/11/09

      @Murray is the only one who seems to have picked up on the fact that this nightclub wasn’t trying to ban actual metros, it was banning loser wannabes and abject fashion victims. Metrobogan is right, Murray, I reckon you’ve coined a term.

      If you are a man and wear white shoes (especially if they are pointy), you should not get in anywhere, especially the Spring Carnival.

      And, if you wear Ed Hardy, you should probably be put into some kind of isolation unit!

      Re the list idea, how about IN: decent shampoo and conditioner; OUT: hair straighteners (it’s true, some men straighten their hair!)

      Or, IN: clothes that fit (i.e, not every man is a ‘large’); OUT: tight t-shirts with plunging necklines. (So, you wax your chest; we don’t need to see your man-cleavage ...)

    • Thomas Stanton says:

      10:16am | 17/11/09

      Somehow I think we have all truly blended the line between bogans and metros.
      There is a huge difference.
      But I still think both should be banned.
      Yay.

    • Jolanda says:

      10:18am | 17/11/09

      That is the same loophole that allows discrimination against persons who are said to be superior or gifted and it is a loophole that needs to be rectified because it discriminates and allows for neglect and psychological abuse.

      It is one thing to be permitted to discriminate against someone if they are being rude and disrespectful but quite another thing to be allowed to discriminate against someone just because you think or you think that they think that they are better than you.

      How is this accepting difference?

    • BT says:

      10:25am | 17/11/09

      Just a thought, but I suspect that the metrosexual male is extremely jealous of the power beautiful women weild. Isn’t mimickry the most sincere form of flattery?

    • bec says:

      10:34am | 17/11/09

      First, they came for the diamond ear-studs,
      And I didn’t speak up because I don’t wear diamond ear-studs;

      Then they came for the wearers of Ed Hardy,
      And I didn’t speak up because Ed Hardy is really goddamn ugly;

      Then they came for the tanorexics,
      And I didn’t speak up because my skin is actually a normal and natural tone and not beta-carotene orange;

      And then they came for me.
      Damn boutique beer gave me away.

    • BJ Benny C says:

      10:41am | 17/11/09

      I get ready to go out in about 11 minutes…. 5 minutes in the shower, 90 seconds shaving with an expensive razor, moisturise with a $45 bottle of Clinique Men, wax in hair, smoke a quick coolstick and out the door! I still get called a metro boy band lookin’ gypo!! I don’t get facials, manicures or ass waxing!!

    • dodge says:

      11:23am | 17/11/09

      @ Zeta,

      Yes yes, thank you for the correction, I meant hypocrisy.

    • papachango says:

      12:31pm | 17/11/09

      sorry I’m confused.

      I thought metrosexuals were make-up wearing ponces who wouldn’t dream of getting in a fight as it might smudge their male eyeliner (just don’t call it Mascara)

      I thought it was bogans (the sartorial opposite of metrosexuals) that caused all the violence?

      I’m clearly way out of date as my clubbing days ended about the beginning of the 90s but can anyone help me out here?

    • Catharine says:

      12:33pm | 17/11/09

      Great column. Given your astonishing and previously well hidden expertise on this subject I do have one small question: where does the manbag sit on the metrosexuality register. I have a clear memory of them as a kid in the 70s. There was always some bloke at your parents’ party teaming a beige vinyl clutch with a figure hugging purple paisley body shirt. Yet the manbag never made an appearance in this latest bout of straight male dandyism. Why?

      PS There’s only ever been one group of men who could pull off fancy pants without looking like tools for mine. I speak of course of the Rat Pack. Sartorial highlight of the bunch - Dean Martin: the drinking woman’s Frank Sinatra.

    • Tim says:

      12:57pm | 17/11/09

      @BJ Benny C,
      Haha thats gold.
      You are like a hybrid super metro. Able to primp yourself in just 10mins. Amazing.

    • Jimbo Jones says:

      01:00pm | 17/11/09

      Metro’s are like the droogs in Clockwork Orange, in fact I’d argue that they’re only one step away from reinstating the codpiece as a fashion item (shhh, don’t tell them, can you imagine diamond studded ‘cod’s’ and blokes at the bar comparing one ‘cod’ to another… sick).  See also, American Psycho for more ridiculing of hyper obsessive fashion loving males (at least Patrick Bateman never wore clown shoes).

    • Paul Colgan

      Paul Colgan says:

      02:00pm | 17/11/09

      Catharine - excellent question on the manbags. I’m not sure but I would think it was partly because they were roundly ridiculed in the late 90s in an episode of Seinfeld which you’ve probably seen: Jerry spent the entire episode explaining it wasn’t a purse, but a European carry-all. As an ironic understanding of pop culture is critical to the metro ethos, many would have seen this and taken note.

    • Julia says:

      03:21pm | 17/11/09

      Man bags - they were the little clutches with straps - sit somewhere on the dag scale near the safari suit and the quiff.  A satchel is an over the shoulder thing - and depending on how fru-fru it is, can be acceptable.

      Mind you, punks used to carry the Birmingham/Newcastle bags (the bags the miners used to carry) in an effort to be ironic, as most of them wore more metal than they’d ever dug up.

    • Jay says:

      04:30pm | 17/11/09

      Ahhhh - Man Bags - unfortunately they are back, as revealed in that hideous ‘reality’ show ‘True Beauty’ where one of the emotionally crippled blokes sported a ‘Murse’ (no joke - that is what the cretin called it) - and yes - the rest of the empathy retards bagged him for it…

      Zeta – I think I’m in love. I’ve been known to sport a Dali mo on occasion – how does that figure in the beard/soul patch showdown?

    • Andrew says:

      07:58pm | 17/11/09

      Best 45 bucks you ever spent.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      08:35pm | 17/11/09

      I’ve clearly missed how discrimination against what people have chosen to wear is a win for real equality. I need some elaboration because this just seemed just like an attack article.

    • stephen says:

      09:30pm | 17/11/09

      Walk down the main street wearing a t-shirt proclaiming ’ I’m a geek/nerd. A genius’. That ought’a fix it. And if they ask what sex you are, say your a METRO.

    • BJ Benny C says:

      10:43am | 18/11/09

      It’s called a satchel in Dublin… The manbag. It has more of a Little Red Riding Hood ring to it! Also Frodo Baggins had one and he was mad to get Sam Wise in the sack.

    • Catharine Lumby says:

      04:01pm | 18/11/09

      Tks for the manbag tips all. Now I know what I’m getting my bloke for Xmas. May have to hunt online for the vintage kind. Can’t wait to see his face on Xmas morning

    • Drew (Darlinghurst) says:

      07:23pm | 27/11/09

      Meterosexuals….meh

      Thank God Im Homosexual.

      I find most Heterosexual men….... LAME.

      Now piss off back to Suburbia Meeeeow. raspberry

    • Alex says:

      02:47pm | 11/12/09

      There is nothing wrong with a guy looking after himself. On that note some guys do go too far, if you don’t have at least a few rough edges that define you as a man you may as well wear a dress.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @popculturechris: Meanwhile, Gotye holds no.1 for a sixth massive week in the US - "that" song has now sold over 4 million copies there.

ToryShepherd

@loupascale if the survey made you sad, probably skip the comments...

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter