If you weren’t aware it’s big day in the UK today. It is general election day, and will see eith Gordon Brown ousted as Prime Minister to be replaced by the first Conservative Prime Minister in 13 years, or see Labour given an unprecedented fourth term in Government.
London’s two big tabloids have backed different parties.
The Sun, a newspaper who backed Tony Blair 13 years ago, is now firmly behind Conservative David Cameron, the man who has painted himself as Blair’s natural successor.
Meanwhile the Daily Mirror has continued their support for the Labour Party, making Cameron’s privileged upbringing the focus of the attack. They make it more explicit in an alternate front page you can see below the fold, which reminds readers he was a member of Oxford’s famous Bullingdon Club (along with London Mayor Boris Johnson) that would go around trashing pubs and writing cheques for the damage.
Meanwhile the broadsheets are more restrained.
The Times has backed the Conservatives, arguing they are best to handle the problems with Britain’s economy:
This election is unlike other watershed moments. In 1979, the case for sorting out the economy scarcely needed to be articulated. When rubbish lies uncollected in the streets and the electricity does not work, you know it is time for a change. Today’s economic crisis, in contrast, is more remote. But it is no less real or significant.
The Times has already cast its vote. It is not, of course, for us to tell you how to vote, only how we think. We believe that the Conservative Party is best placed to tackle the vast economic challenges ahead.
While The Guardian, who didn’t back a vote for the Labour Party, couldn’t quite bring itself to advocate a vote for the Tories. It settled somewhere in between with the resurgent Liberal-Democrats:
Citizens have votes. Newspapers do not. However, if the Guardian had a vote in the 2010 general election it would be cast enthusiastically for the Liberal Democrats. It would be cast in the knowledge that not all the consequences are predictable, and that some in particular should be avoided. The vote would be cast with some important reservations and frustrations. Yet it would be cast for one great reason of principle above all.
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
Meanwhile, in the real world, hard-working Australians pack the kids' lunches and bundle them off to school #Ruddvenge#Auspol
Stuff all this Rudd bullshit. Read this fantastic yarn about the making of the greatest Simpsons episode of them all http://t.co/HB4ztLdX
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
A sneak preview of PM Kevin Rudd Mark II
After modest carousing following his second elevation to Prime Minister - no more than half an hour -…
Scorched earth is all that will remain if they keep this up
Never underestimate the furiously protective streak of an adult daughter towards her father. Last night…
Kindergarten philosophy
My freshly kindergarten-ed daughter has been learning all sorts of stuff at her new school. Last weekend,…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: Australia, we’re a bunch of heartless travel snobs
Justin says:
My 2 cents worth, If you feel the need to belittle other peoples holidays/methods of travel/experiences/destinations/restaurants they choose etc etc, then you should probably take a look at yourself in the mirror as well. People should be free to travel as they can best afford, best suits… [read more]From: This Sally’s no lay down, she’s a lay down misère
Jacques Meoff says:
"Why can't we have more athletes like Sally Pearson?" The answer is actually pretty simple, notwithstanding the simple fact that she is an incredible athlete, the AIS pour 99 percent of their money into supporting the swimmers. Unless you form part of that team you fund yourself to train, travel and… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops
Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more
Most commented