The queasy feeling in my stomach as I flew into Sydney after five weeks in Europe had little to do with the turbulence and even less to do with the 764 unopened emails that found their way into my inbox between London and Singapore. Rather, the source of the unease was that I was landing at the beginning of an election cycle. Most of us suspect that this election is going to be short on substance and will provide us with little vision for our future.

Which would you pick: Masterchef, or the debate? Artwork by The Australian's Peter Nicholson

As someone who consumes political commentary, I have grown increasingly disillusioned by both a government and opposition who swing from the banal to the ridiculous. For many of us, this election is less about voting for who inspires us, and more about who is least likely to offer an absurd policy vision.

My sense of dread has not eased as we enter the second week of the election cycle marked by a leaders debate that was focussed on the bland. The question is whether this is likely to continue?  Here are five policy areas that may well provide a guide: will we see real policy discussion or be served up glib one-liners?

1. A price on carbon
It would seem that Australia is one of a handful of nations who seems to think that we can escape placing a price on carbon. This policy discussion, however, is likely to be avoided because Tony Abbott and the dinosaurs believe that we can continue to emit this stuff with no consequences despite what the vast majority of the science and economic community are telling us.

The ALP had blown a mandate to act on climate change and is now looking meek – and is most likely to avoid any discussion in the election, offering us a citizen assembly to discuss it. While such processes are valuable, it is hard not to see it as anything but a delaying tactic. Abbott’s response? His meaningless mantra: “a big new tax on everything”.

2. Unemployment and incentives
The term “working families” is now a favourite amongst both the government and opposition. It seems that everything is about now about working families. The question is, who are the non-working families? Most of us are lucky to be both working and have a family.

So who is left behind?

The policy mix seems to be at pains to ignore those who are not working. In a time when structural unemployment continues in our manufacturing industries and is often geographically based, there needs to be a vision for Australia that considers the more vulnerable and is not reliant on the mining industry.

3. Housing and sustainable cities
Australian housing policy seems to be best described as a land grab. It is about offering more land and building bigger houses further and further away from where people work. There seems little consideration for either infrastructure or the natural environment. In addition we have an affordability crisis and a rental culture that leaves tenants vulnerable to the whims of their landlords.

It is time to break the cycle of more land equals cheaper housing. This linear equation has been the basis of housing policy for decades and fails to consider the need for less energy and water intensive cities. It also fails to build the real cost of housing in.

It is time to look at large scale urban consolidation as well as long-term tenancy agreements (such as 5 to 7 years). Accompanied by investment in transport, this could change the trend that makes Australian families vulnerable to water, energy and petrol price increases that are all likely to follow in the decade.

Both major parties have confused population numbers with sustainability: it is a crass equation that will not solve any of our infrastructure or environmental challenges.

4. Interest rates
There is all likelihood that the Reserve Bank may increase interest rates in the coming weeks. Well, this is hardly surprising as the Bank continues to ease back from record low interest rates. Abbott will have a field day on this.

One of the great political economic falsehoods in a globalised world is that interest rates are simply a function of government policy. No, interest rates are more complex than this and rely on domestic and international issues that are often out of the hands of politicians. Sure, the increases over the last 12 months have hurt many of us, but this is a function of international conditions (read China). This has little to do with whether Rudd, Gillard or Abbott are in charge, and claims like those made by John Howard that interest rates would always be lower under a Coalition Government are simply lies.

5. Asylum seekers
I have saved the best to last – the race to the bottom when it comes to asylum seeker policy. To begin with, leaving your country because people are being persecuted around you is not a lifestyle choice. Those making lifestyle choices to be in Australia illegally are the tens of thousands European backpackers who overstay their visas – for those arriving via leaky boats, it is an act of desperation.

This too is a function of international factors and has little to do with domestic policy. The opposition omit to tell us that when the morally questionable temporary protection visas where introduced, the number of boat arrivals actually increased. What drives people to leave their homes are problems at the source – including rising sea levels brought on by global warming.

The “tough on people smugglers” posturing is simply for a domestic audience and should be equated to Bob Carr’s ‘tough on crime’ elections: Carr did not solve crime, and these policies will not bring an end to the boats.

Even politicians are raising concerns about the quality of policy discussions. Ironically, it was Joe Hockey who lamented both the fact that the election debate was moved for the sake of Masterchef as well the rise glib one-liners – and he did this on the same day his leader decided to appear on Hey Hey it’s Saturday’s Red Faces where a pair of dancing poodles won the first prize.

The end result is that we will continue to lose trust in those we elect. A research report released by the Whitlam Institute which I co-authored last year found that young people where increasingly finding politics irrelevant in the lives and simply did not trust politicians – a trend that has emerged across the broader population.

This can only be confronted with some honest policies that will establish a real direction for Australia’s future. Until this happens people will continue to prioritise Masterchef over political debates – and seriously, who can blame them?

Most commented

17 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:55am | 28/07/10

      1. “It would seem that Australia is one of a handful of nations who seems to think that we can escape placing a price on carbon.”

      Really? I know of only a handful of nations that are even seriously considering placing a price on carbon. You seem to have it backwards.

      2. Unemployment and incentives

      Unemployment is pretty low in Australia. As long as the economy is doing well, this problem pretty much takes care of itself.

      We could do with a few more industries, though. I’d suggest uranium enrichment and building of carbon-free nuclear power plants as a starter.

      5 “To begin with, leaving your country because people are being persecuted around you is not a lifestyle choice. “

      However, leaving a different country where you are not being persecuted is a lifestyle choice. And numbers of boat people fell dramatically under Howard’s enlightened policies - a trend which reversed itself when Rudd removed TPVs and offshore detention.

      The facts are simple - boat people are pulled by our policies, not opushed by their circumstances.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      08:06pm | 28/07/10

      @Mr Arvanitakis:  What is it going to take to convince you that the people who come on the boats are people leaving countries from where they could have received safe asylum because they would prefer to come to Australia.  Did the 3 week stand-off on one of our governments Customs & Excise vessels tell you nothing?  Who are these people to demand where they will go.  They do not *tell* us they are coming here whether we like it or not!  Its not their place to make such demands.  If they are accepted for safe asylum in, say, Malaysia, then *that* is where they make their new lives.  It is a different case for genuine refugees, most of whom could not afford to come on these boats as they don’t have the money to pay for the trip.  BTW in my lifetime I have never seen an inordinate number of European backpackers appearing in Australia in their tens of thousands.  This appears to me to be a gross exaggeration of the true facts.  I fully support the Liberal policy with regard to “boat people”.

    • Rosie says:

      07:06am | 28/07/10

      James, you can be forgiven for being out of the country because we do not need another article telling us what we already know that this election lacks substance and will provide us with little vision for our future. How about an article explaining to us which party we should be voting for and not the media’s disilusionment with the 2 major parties

      Unfortunately, it is complusory in this country to vote at an election whether you are a political junkie or not and in just over 3 weeks what is destined to happen to the people and the nation lies in the hands of the winning party. We do not have much choice but have to make do with what the 2 parties have to offer, absurd or not. I believe this election is different because of the controversial circumstances Julia Gillard was appointed PM.

      I don’t take too much notice on what the politicians are saying to win votes and have based my decision on which party will best manage the economy because everything else will feed off a good strong growing economy.

      Newspoll - The Australian - Best to handle the issues?

      Economy: July 23-25 - Labor 35 - Liberals 47

    • Reg says:

      04:58pm | 28/07/10

      Julia was not appointed no matter how you may deem it so, she was elected by her party to the position and has moved promptly to allow the electorate have its say on the matter. Something John Howard would have avoided like the plague.

    • DD Ball says:

      08:18am | 28/07/10

      I notice that whenever the ALP are losing many get bored with the talk. The Liberal policies are clear and getting better defined as the election progresses. On the other hand, the ALP are obfuscating. The negative tactic is not appealing. Consider that Gillard rolled Rudd because he was unpopular, but kept his bad policy, or made the bad policy her own.

    • iansand says:

      09:34am | 28/07/10

      What’s the weather like in La La Land?

    • Beagle says:

      10:44am | 28/07/10

      DD Ball, the 2004 one nation candidate for Blaxland

      and you couldn’t even make a comment about the Asylum seekers?

      C’mon Harry tell us what you really think

    • Reg says:

      05:02pm | 28/07/10

      DD - please not the obfuscating again, you’ll do yourself a further damage.

    • Adam DIver says:

      08:59am | 28/07/10

      So every policy you mention comes from the left and here you are spruiking no vision. You could rename this article “How the ALP have ignored thier voter base”. Personaly a price on carbon is a fallacy, it will achieve nothing unless every nation is involved and has considerable drawbacks.

      The same people who want a price on carbon are the same people who thought wind and solar would solve all our power needs. Well that turned out to be a great success. Wind and solar are not intermittent at all. Unemployment is hardly an issue, perhaps some structural reform is needed but if people do not move to where there is work now I assume its more a welfare issue rather than an employment one.

      The only real issue you mention here is the sustainable cities one, but that is really a state issue anyway. So well done, 5 great points on nothing. Way to add vision to the election.

    • Daniel says:

      09:00am | 28/07/10

      Bring back Master chef.

    • jb says:

      09:09am | 28/07/10

      Well it’s just got a little more interesting…

    • M says:

      10:31am | 28/07/10

      It’s no wonder young Australians are being turned off politics- they want respectable debates about how to take Australia forward in an age of climate change, war and overpopulation, but all we get are slogans and cheap insults. Maybe that’s the idea- if politics is made sufficiently banal, people might stop taking an active interest in the way the country’s run.

    • Saskia says:

      12:18pm | 28/07/10

      The statements “boring election”, “no policies”, “they are all the same” are simply the code of the closet ALP voter.  I have never known a Coalition voter to ever say they are both the same! 

      They are POLLS APART!  Economic management (which is the MAIN thing a govt needs to be good at), alone is the an area of huge and demonstrable difference between the parties.  Why no mention of this in your article?

      Stop with the cop out statements to justify your voting Labor.  The parties are hugely different.  The ALP are sly and claim to be conservative just to win an election as was seen with Rudd.

      So vote proudly for ALP or their b!tches the Greens and tell us why you will do so, but enough of the banal statements to mask the fact that you are just another rusted-on Labor hack that would vote for them no matter how appalling they are.

    • Dognuts says:

      03:18pm | 28/07/10

      And things will be so different with Abbott eh? To be honest, apart from some fiddling at the margins, there is bugger all different between now and the last election. We still heap largesse on the middle class, whose love of welfare knows no bounds. We still have a strong economic outlook, and we still need China to prop us up. This election will forever be remembered as the one where no vision or courage was presented to the people by either side. Does anyone think either side has any vision beyond the 3 year election cycle? If someone chose to chuck in a donkey, I wouldn’t blame them. Rudd promised the world and delivered bugger all, and the other mob basically sat back and sniped for their own gain. We will all be the losers in this race to the bottom election

    • Reg says:

      05:16pm | 28/07/10

      Saskia I don’t know what you’ve been on but the Liberals have been trying to draw the commonality line for yonks. Anything to dilute the dreadful burden of WorkChoices. Of course they’re poles apart, anyone who thinks that Liberals and their fine rural brethren have the good of the people at heart, are off with the fairies.  2.  that’s the one ... Unemployment and Incentives on the big scale. Carve off dodgy business just as they seek to carve off the handicapped and the unemployable. Then we’ll see some Liberal moderation.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      05:23pm | 28/07/10

      Watching Joe Hockey this afternoon in a press conference on sky news demonstrated just how desperate and cold hearted political parties have become.
      Joe was beside himself, the look of disappointment that the inflation figures came in lower than experts, and the Liberal party for that matter, had anticipated. Had the figure reached the level that economists had forecasted it would have meant that the RBA would have had little reason to leave interest rates on hold thus giving the opposition a free kick leading into the election. But with the underlying measures of inflation averaging at 2.7% for the twelve months it seems unlikely that the RBA will increase rates at it’s next meeting in a weeks time.
      For Joe and the Liberal party I can understand their desire to retain government but what sickens me is the levels to which they stoop. It’s alright for him and his wife on the money they earn but it’s the average Joe, no pun intended, that does it the hardest when the RBA increases interest rates.

    • AS says:

      10:17pm | 28/07/10

      I tuned in to watch part of the debate and my question is, why was it called a “debate”? My memories are of a debate is an argument, with examples, statistics and research supporting your teams position…

      We are turned off by politics because the amount of marketing and brand associated with an election!!!

      I will tune back into politics when there is a structured debate on “Australia, under this government, after three years will…(insert govt position here with strategy, mission and vision)”

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Paul Colgan

How the totally awesome weather in Australia recently is hurting retailers http://t.co/4dvDwDlNZG

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter