If you are already sure who you are going to vote for at this year’s federal election then consider yourself a member of a minority group: the ‘rusted-on voter’.

I'm happy to fill that how to vote card in for you girls. Photo: AFP

As this week’s Essential Report illustrates, we have become a Nation of Softies, voters who can be wooed and repelled by our politicians all the way up to voting day.

It is a change in our political culture from previous generations who inherited a party from their parents and stuck with it through thick and thin.

It’s a change that gives real bite to the political contest in an election year.

How strong is your voting intention?

Describe this image

Where elections used to be determined by the mythical ‘swinging voter’ - the 10 per cent of the population which changes its mind - modern campaigns need to not just target a narrow centre but engage a majority of the electorate who blow in the wind.

So how do you woo the softies? The trick is no longer to mobilise the heartland, but to engage the disengaged with an issue that will break through the white noise.

A look at recent issues shows how the winner has managed to create (or been presented with) an iconic issue to mobilise the softies across traditional political lines– asylum seekers, WorkChoices, Mark Latham.

As 2010 progresses, both sides of politics will; be looking for the iconic issue that will engage the disengaged, that crosses the traditional Party divide to win a majority.

More than most previous election years, 2010 begins as a black canvas – with Labor well ahead of a new Opposition Leader working hard to establish a clear point of difference with a first-term government.

Here are some of the issues ripe for the contest:

Climate Change – Abbott’s ‘great big new tax on everything’ has certainly shifted the Climate Change debate. The ETS is discredited and people have forgotten what it was for in the first place. This clearly neutralises Labor’s advantage on managing the environment – the problem for Tony Abbott is if the election is run on climate change, no-one actually thinks the Liberals have a solution to a problem that will not disappear with the next spin cycle.

Economic Management – Labor has rightly taken the credit for avoiding the worst of the GFC, but is now stuck in the old place of being the big-spending, high deficit party that you wouldn’t trust with your savings. Abbott’s ability to cast the ETS as a tax will helps the Liberals on this front (softies hate taxes), although once the ETS is dead so is this line of attack.

Leadership – The softer the voter, the more important the personality of the leader – Abbott is the wildcard here –with his budgie smugglers, copious body hair and much-quoted views on virginity, is he refreshingly human or a little creepy? 70 per cent of people we polled don’t want politicians to tell lecture them about morality. The big question is: can Abbott put a sock in it (and we don’t mean the Speedos).

Health: Health is looming as Kevin Rudd’s proxy campaign if he decides that unpopular State Governments are becoming to big a liability. A hostile federal takeover of state health systems would send the softies the message that Kevin Rudd hates your state government as mush as you do.

Education: Labor seems hell bent on going to war with teachers over League Tables, if it sparks strikes in the back half of this year how will this play with the softies?  Rest assured the research is underway even as we speak.

Asylum Seekers – An oldie but a sure fire way of gaining traction with the softies. Incumbents can turn border protection into an iconic event – this is a little harder from Opposition.

WorkChoices: The softies moved against John Howard when he started attacking their industrial rights. Tony Abbott is still wedded to the idea but will he risk re-running the 2007 election – and has Labor done enough to convince the electorate that they are that different?

The Sleeper: or is there another issue lurking underneath the national agenda; something that will tap into the hopes, or more likely, fears of the majority of voters who are no longer loyal foot soldiers, but rather sceptical consumers of politics?

Most commented

19 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      06:38am | 02/02/10

      Your comment
      “the problem for Tony Abbott is if the election is run on climate change, no-one actually thinks the Liberals have a solution to a problem that will not disappear with the next spin cycle”.

      Don’t they release their policy this morning?
      Should Rudd do a back flip on his great new tax then how does that make little Gracie feel.

      Education… if teachers do run industrial action as they are threatening it will be best to do it in the back end of the year. Plenty of time to not comply which will distort the league tables to the point of being worthless. I’ll wager the popularity of the site will suffer a major decline in know time at all. There is still a shit load the Opposition can ping Gillard on here if they get their act together.
      I think the sleeper will be the “great awakening”. When people realize that this government has done little but spin its way since 2007. Election promises achieved? NIL

    • Evan Findlay says:

      01:50pm | 02/02/10

      Wayne Hutchins, commentat 7:38. The policy has been released Wayne and you can tell Mr Abbott to use the money for infrastructure. It’s a policy to say “We have a policy”, unfortunately it has no substance and it will achieve very little. He would be better off sticking with his second, or was it third change of mind and declare that global warming is crap. He still wouldn’t have integrity but at least we will know where he stands! So much for the claim that it won’t be a tax. Who does he think will be footing the 3.2 Billion dollar bill? Who does he think will pay for the fees that businesses will incur it they go over their limits? That’s the problem with the coalition, they rarely are a party of policy and when they do attempt to make policy they don’t make it stand up to scrutiny. It makes it easy for the coalition to make election promises as they can always refer to them as core and non core.

    • Eric says:

      07:07am | 02/02/10

      You left out Internet censorship, another issue on which the Opposition has an advantage over the Government.

      However, there won’t be a spill until the public becomes dissatisfied or bored with the present government, a condition unlikely to be met this time around.

    • AJ says:

      08:55am | 02/02/10

      Sorry Eric, you’re flat-out making things up now.  The Libs haven’t suggested they oppose the concept of filtering, they’re too afraid of their hard right to do so, they’ve only raised some questions about workability.  The only party to suggest that censorship itself is stupid and doesn’t protect anyone is the Greens.

    • Sheila says:

      07:40am | 02/02/10

      Tony Abott is sexist , don’t underestimate the female vote. Men are not the only voters in this country

    • Eric says:

      08:31am | 02/02/10

      On the other hand, Sheila, the Labor Party is misandrist. Men vote, too.

    • Maaca says:

      09:13am | 02/02/10

      And how sheila?

      by telling his Teenage daughters to value their Virginity?

      wow, shocker

    • persephone says:

      08:47am | 02/02/10

      I don’t think we have much previous data on softies, so it’s a bit of a stretch to say we’ve ‘become’ softer.

      And it might be a bit like religion - huge numbers of people claim to be Christian, because they think that’s a good thing to say, but when it comes to the crunch, they don’t go to church, have virtually no knowledge of the Bible and wouldn’t recognise a Commandment if it coveted their ass.

      So most people like to pretend that they’re not rusted on, that they’re going to carefully weigh up the issues and the qualities of the candidates and parties….and then vote the way they always have.

      The past few ‘landslide’ elections suggest it’s not even 10% who swing; more like 5%.

    • 6clegs says:

      11:54am | 02/02/10

      re the OP:  you speak about the ‘mythical swinging voter being 10% that’s always held the outcome of elections in their hands’—- so how is that any different to now? With our now larger population, 10% is a fair swathe of the populace.

      Sadly I know of people that make up their mind in the booth, and some that complain about ‘‘those rotten senate papers’‘. Most people couldn’t give a hoot about politics - until a decision affects them, or their hip pocket, then they ‘care’.( I think peoples most vital nerve, their hip pocket, has had more to do with suddenly becoming ‘‘skeptical’’ about climate change.)
      Howard got too many people used to middle class welfare - now it’s time to pay the piper ( lifestyles etc) and as per usual it will be that most vital of nerves that decide which boxes get ticked… *sigh*

    • Joe Stephens says:

      12:23pm | 02/02/10

      I prefer the person who knows who they are going to vote for even before the leader of the party is named… much smarter people.

    • millie says:

      12:34pm | 02/02/10

      apparently we the tax payer have to pay for the liberal plane not the polluters.
      and no compensation, when the masses work this one out
      i wonder.  I was quite surprised if this is all tone can come up with.
      I think people heard about the tony army and thought   o he is going to clean the globe for nothing what a great idea.  there is no free luch as they say.
      He says a lot about nothing really.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      01:26pm | 02/02/10

      Dear millie @ 1.34pm And you don’t believe you will be paying much much more for Krudds great big new tax. You haven’t even had a chance to digest the policy yet so until you do why would anybody be interested in what you have got to say on the matter. You are knocking it for the sake of knocking it. From what I have heard so far this could be good for the country but it will take a few days to get into finer detail.

    • persephone says:

      02:45am | 03/02/10

      Wayne

      it’s only thirty pages and there’s only about ten which are ‘policy’ - the rest is whinging about Labor and giving us a brief history lesson, so it’s not that much to get your head around.

      No mention whatsoever about how they’re going to fund over $3 billion of spending over the next four years. As they’ve ruled out going into debt, or raising taxes, the only way they can do it is by cutting government spending.

      Add those three billions to various other Opposition announcements where they’ve made it clear they’re not going to cut spending and in many cases are going to raise it, and how they pay for all their promises becomes very interesting.

      My tip is that your local school won’t get that hall.

    • Eric says:

      12:58pm | 02/02/10

      No, AJ, you’re the one making things up. In twelve years of government, the Coalition did not introduce Internet censorship, or attempt to do so. It provided optional internet filters that people could choose to install on their own computers.

      Labor is committed to a compulsory filter that would censor everyone. It’s official policy and moving forward.

      There’s a clear difference between the two parties on this issue, and the Libs have the more popular option.

    • E says:

      01:25pm | 02/02/10

      Yep internet censorship, if any party comes out against it, or independent, theyve got my vote hands down. Its the most important issue right now by miles, because its the only open attack on our fundemental freedoms, all the rest is paper work.
      I cant understand how 10% of the population could rate KRudd (or any politician of either party) as ‘good’, raise your expectations people!

    • stephen says:

      02:47pm | 02/02/10

      We’re doin’ fine.
      Swinging voters vote ‘local’.
      As long as the economy keeps its back up, no worries.

    • KEIThy says:

      05:49pm | 02/02/10

      Did 9-11 get a guernsey?!!?

    • DavesDiner says:

      09:43pm | 02/02/10

      My thanks to Kerry O’Brien from the 7.30 report of ABC. He interviewed a stuttering Tony Abbott tonight and clarified his global warming policy so I could understand it. Well Mr Abbott, you have sprouted on about Rudds new big tax and you want to let these big emitters of the hook and tax us!! Kevin Rudd on the other hand wants to charge these big emitters and reimburse low and middle income earners. Let these Liberal Fat Cats who vote for Abbott pay for it,  I am voting for Labor. Kudo’s to Mr Turnbull you have my admiration mate, your a brave and honest man and that seems to be a rarity for The Liberals

    • Anjuli says:

      10:54am | 16/02/10

      What happened at the last election ,the economy was going just fine then
      so why did the people change to Labor. It had nothing to do with how the economy was doing the newsprint wanted change so they were on Labor’s side and that was the end of the Liberals .Yes John Howard should have given up the leadership but the papers sure did a piece of work on him.
      Education, this new school site is appalling both my girls went to the same school with the same teachers ,one became DUX of her year the other went to socialize it mattered little what we did as parents. The first went onto a brilliant career while the youngest went into child care work which she was sorted for as she was so good at it but then since as a mature student she has just graduated as an RN at over 40 ,it is never too late.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

KRudd gives marriage equality folk hope, but odds still against it passing on June 6. http://t.co/QmQffMkSvH

Malcolm Farr

ACL says gay marriage would lead to gay sex (how to do it) being taught in schools. You really haver to credit them with vivid imagination.

ToryShepherd

Welcome to your wombiverse. On orgasmic births and being so happy you could cry http://t.co/7JrbQSCV6j

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @GordyPls: So much is wrong with this article but the last setence is absolutely astonishing http://t.co/IpoXoCiN8Y

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter