Has anyone else noticed there was something missing from the reaction to last week’s failed terrorism plot to stage a Last Stand at Holsworthy?

Jon Kudelka's take on the Howard years, from www.101usesforajohnhoward.com

I pricked up my ears and sniffed the air but try as I might I could no longer detect a dog whistle, that barely audible call to channel justified fear into something altogether more ugly.

In a sign that the Howard era is finally over, both the Prime Minister and the besieged Opposition Leader exhibited a fundamental decency in playing the men and not the race.

Their words on fighting terror were appropriately strong, but there were none of the sly hooks about ‘not in our country’ nor the craven calls to review refugee intakes, those kernels of division that for too long had been part and parcel of our global security debate.

You could argue that Rudd is too much the diplomat wonk to play these games and that Turnbull was too busy being hit by a runaway ute, but the effect was the same: to manage fear and not inflame it. 

For those of us who like to whinge about how little there is between the parties it is a moment worth noting; proof positive that when you change a government you do change a country.

And it was interesting to watch the way the media followed our leaders’ example. We were more likely to read stories about lapsed children of migrants than rants against their community leaders.

All of which leaves me wondering whether we are entering a new and more mature stage in our engagement with global security, where our leaders attempt to understand our enemies rather than demonise them.

It’s not as if the situation wasn’t ripe for blowing the whistle. According to The Punch’s Three-Step Plan for Propagating Fear and Loathing, things were lining up nicely.

First requirement for Propagating Fear and Loathing: the threat needs to be realistic, and while the home-grown terror plot caught many in the media by surprise, but not the general public, according to a recent Essential Report.

In late July we asked the public to name Australia’s top security threat and were somewhat surprised to see Local Extremists (23 per cent) coming in just behind Terror attacks in Indonesia (35 per cent) as our number one fear.

Significantly the local threat was seen as far graver than the war on Afghanistan (eight per cent), the war in Iraq (four per cent) and Iranian nuclear capability (three per cent).

These figures are interesting because it shows the grounds to sow fear and still fertile – even before the attacks people saw a real and present danger in their own backyard.

And the Second Requirement for Propagating Fear and Loathing, economic insecurity, is also present, with more than a third of the public currently expecting their economic conditions to deteriorate over the next 12 months.
Indeed, the combination of economic insecurity and defined group of immigrants was the real hook behind the Tampa crisis.

Back in 2000, EMC started packing up rising insecurity amongst Australian workers in focus groups, with concern focussed on off-shoring of jobs and cheap foreign inputs.

We channelled these concerns into the “Fair Trade not Free Trade’ campaign for Doug Cameron and the AWMU, arguing (to little success) that neo-Liberal policies were hurting Australian workers.

The champion of free markets, John Howard, (with help from Mark Textor) took the same information and turned it into a moral panic about boat-people that led to the show down on the Tampa and the election-winning call that we would decide who would come into this country.

Which brings me to the Third Requirement for Propagating Fear and Loathing – political will. Leaders decide whether they want to unlock our better angels or allow fear to reign.

Political parties do not have a mortgage on this.

Labor under the White Australia Policy championed fear; Malcolm Fraser turned his back on it allowing a generation of Vietnamese boat-people to rebuild their lives.

The take-out from the last week, is that whatever else you think of them, we now have two leaders who take their responsibilities seriously – and that’s a great step forward for the entire nation.

Most commented

14 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      07:44am | 11/08/09

      Islam is a religion, not a race. And that is where the threat lies.

      You’re the one dog-whistling, attempting to falsely portray your opponents as racists.

    • G says:

      07:56am | 11/08/09

      I think you’re giving Turnbull way too much credit - if he’d been in a better position to do it he would have but he’s just had his bum smacked in recent media coverage and felt correctly that he wouldn’t gain any traction.  I’m sure the Liberal party room would have tried to push for it - after all it worked so well for them in the past.

    • Pete Davies says:

      09:10am | 11/08/09

      Peter you say the word ‘fear’ alot. Who is scared of these punks? You? And if you say we saw terror coming why was Holsworthy, a key army base, unguarded? (A sophisticated terrorist honey trap perhaps?) Why should Rudd be congratulated for retaining Howard’s draconian anti- terrorism laws just because people like you are fearful and loathing and blind to clone political parties? The elephant in the room that you so strangely danced and whistled around is: Rudd needs his bum kicked, repeatedly, for being to gutless to reprimand the police for media glory seeking and leaking the story before the ‘secret’ raids actually happened.

    • Anthony says:

      09:46am | 11/08/09

      “I could no longer detect a dog whistle”

      So you’re not a dog anymore.  Congratulations.

    • Dude says:

      10:34am | 11/08/09

      Sadly we needed howard. Life is ups and downs. You need the downs to appreciate and reconise the ups. Howard took this country down as far as a civilised nation can go, it can only be up from there whistle or not.

    • R.E.L. says:

      11:32am | 11/08/09

      Peter, Malcolm Fraser also opened the floodgates to Shi’ite Muslim immigration during the Lebanese civil war in the mistaken belief that anyone who was targeted over there automatically deserved asylum over here.
      It turns out that many (not all) of them were/are supporters of Hizbullah in the Secular vs Islamist vs Maronite violence and are the progenitors of many of our “home grown” terrorism plotters.

      Besides, the entire article is ridiculous. These men do not plot attacks in a vacuum; they are guided by a particular ideology and John Howard was correct in playing the ideology as well as the man. Kevin Rudd would do well to do the same.

      It would be like saying “Hitler was evil. It had nothing to do with his Nazional Sozialist supremacist ideology. He was just a very naughty boy”.

      Get real.

    • Gibbot says:

      12:02pm | 11/08/09

      That’s the second good article the Punch have published on this issue in two days.

      The usual frightened bleating is to be expected, but in time it, like Howard, will drift into much deserved obscurity.

      Thanks Peter.

    • Iain Hall says:

      12:16pm | 11/08/09

      I think that what you celebrate in this post is in fact something to be ashamed of because the reports are pussyfooting around the truth that a desire for religious glory is a motivating factor in this sort of behaviour. But It also shows a profound distrust for the good sense of the Australian people who are well and truly capable of telling the difference between an Islamist and a Muslim and understanding that while former is to be reviled that the later is probably as disgusted as any Anglo about these sort of plots.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      03:17pm | 11/08/09

      FBI conference (in Gold Coast of all places..) correctly concluded that International Organized Crime is a greater transnational threat than terrorism.

    • davido says:

      03:58pm | 11/08/09

      OMG you are so right.

    • R.E.L. says:

      05:00pm | 11/08/09

      Shane From Melbourne:
      The main threat has never been terrorism. It is Islamism - the political movement (as opposed to Islam the religion).

      Far greater a threat than violent movements such as al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hizbollah, JI, LeT, etc. are the “peaceful” Islamists such as Hizb-u-Tahrir. They advocate an Islamist takeover of the globe from Morroco to Indonesia through non-violent means by winning our hearts and minds and trying to convince us we’d be better off living under Shari’a than secular law. As they oppose violence as a means to gaining power, they can be more convincing…

    • Idris says:

      06:37pm | 11/08/09

      John who? Little Johnny got some things right; but was out of his depth as a leader: same goes for MT. Did you know that the Pope is a Jew? ‘Just look at his name!’  that is the level of intellect that supports dimwitted anomie-ridden boys who think that being a warrior, of some sort, makes them a man. Give them a good flogging, and deport the total idiots. They can play brave warrior all they want, if the folk back home will let them.

    • Aaron says:

      08:12pm | 11/08/09

      Spot on Peter. There’s a stack of good (but detailed non-headline grabbing) work the Rudd Government (especially McLelland and Evans) have done on civil liberties and refugee/immigration reforms etc etc. They appear to have intelligently restrained themselves from blowing their own trumpet on a lot of these progressive reforms. The only shame is that the Greens and non Labor left don’t give Labor any credit for it. But then, they never would’ve anyway. Your article is a good one for reflecting on how our country has changed for the better since Kev 07.

    • Dan says:

      12:42am | 12/08/09

      R.E.L. Your talk of Islamicism taking over by winning eharts and minds is absolute nonsence. Burt even if it were true, there’s nothing wrong with attempting to win hearts and minds. Also, Howard played the man, not the ideology. He dog-whistled so much that he might as well have had one permanently wrapped around his neck.

      Eric, the only people who say “Islam isn’t a race, it’s a religion” are Islamophobes like you. You say that the problem is with Islam? Then you ARE Islamophobic, and nothing you say will change that. Oh, and if you don’t like being called racist, then STOP being racist, because that is exactly what you are.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter