THE proposal by education guru Ken Boston to shut down failing schools, sack their principals and replace their teachers is the scholastic equivalent of what’s known as “Ben Tre” logic, from the Vietnamese town of the same name where an American major famously reasoned that “we had to destroy the village in order to save it.”

Eric Lobbecke's illustration from today's Daily Telegraph

The people who will be the most outraged by Ken Boston’s radical but welcome suggestion, made at an Australian Primary Principals Association forum on Monday, are the self-styled defenders of public education in the Teachers Unions.

It’s time that someone rang the school bell on the intellectual contribution these unions make to the quality of the public education.

It’s generally so paltry that you almost suspect that the landed gentry who run Kings, Knox, Xaviers, Melbourne Grammar, St Peters and Prince Alfred College, to name but a few of our more la-di-dah private institutions, have clandestinely bandied together to payroll these unions, as they’re the biggest advertisement for private education going around.

(And that’s not written as a private school toff but the proud product of the public education system, whose own personal views pre-date Gough Whitlam’s on the public funding of a system which is inherently elitist and exclusionary.)

Ken Boston’s proposed scorched-earth policy towards non-performing schools is the industrial nightmare scenario of every teacher’s union in the land.

This is because it involves a much more onerous and candid level of disclosure than even Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Education Minister Julia Gillard are proposing with their push to provide detailed online reporting on the performance of every government school by the end of this year.

It also proposes that problems are not only identified, but that they result in action – with the punting of teachers who preside over consistent mediocrity, or worse.

Boston, who is meeting Julia Gillard and members of the PM’s staff today, said there was limited value in having “opaque” league tables, rather a more direct and detailed account of school performance which gave parents and communities the clearest possible picture of what’s really going on at the local school.

He said the controversial league tables introduced in the UK are “far from transparent.”

“We need rich reports which explain why a school may be performing less well, not just simplistic league tables,” The Australian quoted Dr Boston as saying yesterday. “Don’t massage the data, no jiggery-pokery, no smoke or mirrors, just present the data as it is. My belief is that this would offer greater public accountability than league tables.”

The teaching unions are already on the record in their vehement opposition to the league tables which Dr Boston says are impenetrable or meaningless. Clearly, the proposal of plain English reports, jam-packed with meaningful detail, will be an even more chilling proposition to the unions, as they have shown that the one thing they abhor in the public system is transparency and the industrial repercussions it brings.

That is – acting against principals who have consistently under-delivered, refusing promotions to teachers who do not perform well, or pulling them out of schools where there has been no improvement or a deterioration in grades, despite the fact that they’ve received extra training, extra funds, more support.

It’s garbage for the teaching unions to say their profession cannot be monitored for performance because there are so many intangibles in their job – the biggest one being, obviously, the lucky dip factor with the varying abilities and attitudes that students bring to class with each passing year. 

The first counter-argument is that human resources departments the world over have now perfected the art of running the ruler over every other profession, with their acronym-heavy performance reviews examining “key performance indicators” and what have you. If anything it would seem easier to craft a solution for a profession which itself is framed entirely around assessment.

The second is that there is such a massive divergence in the performance of students in disadvantaged areas – some of them stay listless and ignorant, while others soar, lifting themselves out of poverty and deprivation through a love of learning and a passion to get ahead – that there clearly are some teachers who can educate and inspire, and others who either lack the talent or energy to motivate a troubled class.

In the ongoing debate in NSW over school tables – where the Coalition has trashed a long-standing party principle by siding with the Greens, of all people, to block school league tables, the debate has been clouded by discussion over the media’s role in using data about under-performing schools.

Opposition Leader Barry O’Farrell has spent the past two months sounding more like a future Media Watch host than the next Premier as he maintains a baffling rhetorical alliance with the Greens over the Mount Druitt High School affair, where The Daily Telegraph ran a controversial front-page story in 1997 headed Class We Failed, illustrated with a picture of that year’s HSC class at the impoverished western Sydney school.

In my view, and I was not working for the paper at the time, the story was a noble and sincere campaign for a fair deal for kids and families in one of the newspaper’s heartland – but over the top in its illustration, given the distress it caused the kids on the front page.

But – and this isn’t to argue that the impact on those kids was erased by the long-term good – there is no way the article would have achieved the turnaround for public education in this neglected part of Sydney if the treatment had been toned down.

It was an angry front page. And if you’re prepared to accept the commercial reality that newspapers are businesses, then logic must tell you that no newspaper would risk circulation in its heartland by being deliberately cruel to a bunch of kids. It follows that the only reason the newspaper would have done it was to get the issue on the agenda for government, and to secure much-needed funds for the state’s most under-performing school.

Which is exactly what happened.

As a result of a government inquiry five senior schools in the area were shut down and combined into what is now Chifley College, where the curriculum was revolutionised, teacher numbers increased, new funding was allocated.

In 1996, the ABC’s Radio National chronicled the turnaround at these new western Sydney campuses, where that year a stunning 92 per cent of kids did the HSC. 

Anyone who would argue – or anyone such as O’Farrell who would be swayed by their argument – that the publication of school league tables would invite the annual publication of Mt Druitt style front pages is wrong.

I don’t think any paper in Australia would give another story the same treatment - not just because The Daily Telegraph was sued and lost, but simply because these kids were so upset by what happened that a noble campaign on their behalf ended up looking like an attack on them.

But anyone who values transparency in education should also see though the disingenuous recycling of the Mount Druitt case by the teachers unions. There are plenty of other Mount Druitts out there. And the union, like those parents with Munchausens disorder, has shown by its actions that it’s more comfortable with continuing and avoidable under-achievement by working class children, than any performance-based scrutiny which may put the screws on its members and result in real change.

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • iansand says:

      07:28am | 12/08/09

      You have a touching faith in the media.  I doubt anyone outside the pale has the same faith.

    • Lexi says:

      08:06am | 12/08/09

      @Penbo, your milititant stance against the teachers federation which has a great track record of losing days’ pay to fight for the best for their members’ students is wearing thin.  Change the record or I start buying the SMH rather than the DT every morning.

      After all, from where I’m sitting, it’s not that you REALLY think league tables are going to make life better for the kids in Minto, Mt Druitt and Waterloo.  That in itself is an impossible outcome from publishing league tables.  Your opposition to the NSWTF is that someone’s trying to stop you publishing something.  It wouldn’t matter what - you’d oppose any organisation that you perceived was preventing you from doing your job.  Ironic that you’re doing the same to teachers.

      I’m with Ken Boston on this issue - simplistic league tables will only denigrate poor performing schools.  Parents and prospective parents should have the opportunity to attend the school to be given comprehensive, wide ranging and detailed information about the school, its students, its support systems and its successes. The statistics need to be put in context - rankings don’t really tell you anything…

      Yes, I am aware that I’m making myself a target for the right wing loonies here.

    • Tory Maguire

      Tory Maguire says:

      09:46am | 12/08/09

      Hey Lexi. David’s not the editor of the Daily Tele any more.

    • Lexi says:

      11:00am | 12/08/09

      Hey Tory, his is the opinion piece in today’s editon.  I know, because I got halfway through the first par and gave up - same old.  Page 22 in my edition.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      12:06pm | 12/08/09

      In the business world any business who subsidised their opposition would quickly grow broke. So why does the government subsidise private schools? The huge financial advantage that private schools enjoy over the public system is the major problem.

    • Nick says:

      01:18pm | 12/08/09

      Your article probably illustrates why the media can’t be trusted to get it right. You argue that the enquiry which set up the Chifley Campus achieved a turnaround in 1996. This is pretty impressive considering that the Chifley Campus was incorporated in 2000, and the new site at the former Mount Druitt High School was not occupied by the first Year 11 intake until 2003!

      Allowing a typo in recording the date, your claim that 92% completed the HSC tells nothing. 92% of what? The Year 11 intake of 2003? or the Year 7 intakes, of the five schools that make up the campus that sat the HSC in 2004? In a senior school offering only the two years of the HSC I would expect 92% to complete the course!

      You take the position that Federation opposes assessment of teachers. In fact the Federation has been vocal in opposition to the so-called merit system which allows teachers to be promoted on the basis of CV and interview and no workplace assessment. If you can talk the talk you get promoted. No-one knows if you can walk the walk. This system was introduced, not by educators, but by the ideologically driven Greiner government and Education Minister, Terry Metherell, to place education “on a business model” Prior to this teachers were assessed by school inspectors. No promotion was possible without success at a rigorous inspection process that observed classes, looked at results and the teacher’s ongoing development and contribution to the school. Believe me, as one who experienced this system as both a candidtate and an inspector, it was rigorous! In my career I faced extrenal assessment of my work on no fewer than 5 occasions. (Teacher’s Certificate, List One, List two, List three and List four, from classroom teacher to Principal of a secondary school via Head Teacher and Deputy Principal positions)

      It is not teacher unions that are the problem: it is the interference of politicians interested only in extending their electoral appeal by appearing to be visionary and innovative. NSW Education is still recovering from the Metherell era, and is continually beset by politicaly driven restructures.

    • stephen says:

      02:52pm | 12/08/09

      Don’t sack anybody, don’t bring in any more experts, and no more white/green/yellow papers. Just properly train good quality teachers.
      Say, three years teacher training, beginning in the classroom with a Mentor (no theory).
      Pick the best student applicants, train them well, pay them well, and make them responsible.
      (The authorities should forget about negative re-actions)

    • iansand says:

      03:04pm | 12/08/09

      Shane From Melbourne@12:06 It seems very strange to refer to public and private schools to be in opposition.  Some people send their children to public schools, and those children (on a State and Federal basis) are the beneficiaries of government spending on their education.  Other people send their children to private schools.  Those children receive considerably less government spending.  Private schools are a great deal for taxpayers - the public expense of a private school education is much less than the public expense for a public school education.

    • Socrates says:

      03:48pm | 12/08/09

      @iansand, you are quite right (and no, Lexi, I’m not a “right wing looney” because I don’t exactly share your views).

      There is not one single reason why education must be or should be provided only by the state.  We don’t expect that any other professional services should be limited to those operated by government.  Parents should have the same level of taxpayer support wherever they choose to send their kids for the best education, and a voucher system would be the best way to deliver this.

    • Tim says:

      03:49pm | 12/08/09

      Haha Steve from Melbourne,
      if anything private schools are subsidising the government schools. Parents who send their children to private schools are still forced to pay for public schooling. So as well as taking load off the public system, these parents are also paying to keep the public system going.
      So I agree with you, it is bad for business. The private schools should stop subsidising the public schools and a voucher system should be put in place so parents can have real choice in their children’s schooling.

    • Tony says:

      04:12pm | 12/08/09

      I need to laugh at those who claim that the private system is “subsidising” the state system. It sucks money out that is desperately needed by hte state system. Nowhere else in the world do we see this astonishing level of subsidy for the private system.

      The ste provides a system - if you don’t like it - pay for your own. Why should we be propping up religious schools (and 99% of private schools are religious based).  I went to a “good” private school in the days before “state aid”. In hindsight and with a far better knowledge of the state sector my parents wasted a lot of money - my education was more expensive and no better. What I did receive was a definite attempted brainwashing in the class system, right wing politics and religion.

    • Tim says:

      04:31pm | 12/08/09

      Tony you may need to laugh but you should be laughing at yourself,

      What would happen tomorrow if all the children attending private schools suddenly started attending public schools?
      Even if all the money that was going to the private system was funneled to these public schools, the public system would not be able to afford to educate these extra students without a massive rise in funding.
      How then do you think that private schools are sucking money out of public schools?
      I would also like to see your source for the 99% religious based statistic. From the plucked out of thin air statistic database I think.

    • iansand says:

      04:44pm | 12/08/09

      Tony@4:12 Great idea. What if every kid in the private system flooded the public system tomorrow?  Or if every child in a public school received only the amount that a child in a private school gets? Or if the parents with kids in the private system received a tax rebate for the difference in the respective public funding? You would not have enough fingers and toes to calculate the cost of the ensuing chaos.

      Kids in private schools reduce the overall cost of funding education. Roll on vouchers.

    • Andrew J Smith says:

      07:21pm | 12/08/09

      Have been a teacher, mostly outside of Australia, plus couple of stints in international education area.  I am always curious about notions of quality in Australia regarding teaching.  I do not think you can make a strong direct linkage between teacher quality and grades, too many variables.  Conversely, I do not understand why the majority of good teachers are not open to more direct evaluation and development (as happens internationally), while incompetent or bad teachers survive in the system?

    • Lexi says:

      07:24pm | 12/08/09

      @socrates, the mere fact that you had to defend yourself before anyone suggested YOU were a right wing looney speaks volumes.  I was just saying that I expected to receive some personal attention because of my post.  As you didn’t attack me for my views, I didn’t have a problem with yours.

      and @Tim and @iansand, it’s never going to happen.  AS IF the wanna be blue bloods would let their children share the air of the great unwashed. Oh, and the goody goody Christians wouldn’t want their perfect kiddies corrupted by those evil secular kids, either.

      If we get to pick where our share of tax revenue goes, I’ve decided that mine will subsidise the Australian wine and cheese industries.  After all, that’s of the most benefit to me.

    • iansand says:

      09:07pm | 12/08/09

      Lexi@7:24 What does class warfare have to do with it?  Except that class warfare is the way this debate is always run.  On the simple basis of the numbers, that approach is irrational.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:20am | 13/08/09

      @iansand, socrates, Tim. Don’t feed me such B.S.  A subsidy is a subsidy is a subsidy. If you avail yourself of a service or product, you should be paying full price for that service or product. Sending your kids to a private school is no different from purchasing any other product or service in a capitalist system. Why should anyone fund your lifestyle choices?

    • iansand says:

      12:17pm | 13/08/09

      Shane From Melbourne@11:20 What does class warfare have to do with it?  Except that class warfare is the way this debate is always run.  On the simple basis of the numbers, that approach is irrational.

      My “lifestyle” would be significantly better without school fees.

    • lion says:

      02:27pm | 14/08/09

      David Penberthy’s original article says that the public Teacher Unions are the only opponents of league tables. Check back and he will find that the principals associations of public, independent and catholic schools as well as other interested bodies including the NSW Liberal Party oppose what the Telegraph and similar newspapers will do with the data.
      Why do these debates always come down to public schools v publically funded private schools? iansand The first public funding of education occurred after the low fee Catholics walked their children down to the local public school in the late 60’s and was intended to bring class sizes, the quality of education and building standards up to match public schools. If you have been anywhere near a public school recently, you will have seen that the sustained flow of public money from State and Federal governments over the past 30+ years, accelerating in the past 13 years and guarenteed until 2012 has seen not just the low fee Catholics but low fee Independents, other religious and any other private school surpass public schools for facilities, class sizes and perceived quality.
      The high fee schools have continued to increase their fees even as more government money has rolled in and their funding levels guarenteed not to be reduced for another 3 years.
      David Penberthy and others then expect public schools to allow their data to be published alongside publically funded private exclusive schools who have cherrypicked their students, kicked out the low performers,  refused entry to the most difficult to educate and then spruiked about great results in the press.
      At the moment in education, social justice and equity wears a blndfold.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski I feel your pain #workingtheweekend

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski You sounded testy at 11. I can only imagine...

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter