THERE are some stories that are so sad that they are almost impossible to read, some photographs that you cannot look at without choking up. The death of Dean Shillingsworth is such a story – the gorgeous two-year-old boy from one of the most impoverished suburbs in Sydney’s west, whose mother yesterday pleaded guilty to killing him and stuffing him into a suitcase which she threw into a duck pond.

Lake Angel: the inscription on the memorial at the pond where Dean was found dead.

The manner of Dean’s death goes beyond comprehension. You look at this kid in his Thomas the Tank Engine pyjamas and just shake your head in disbelief, and shed a tear that, maybe, he could have been one of the children who through the support of his extended family, or the attention of a dedicated public school teacher, could have found his way out of the dysfunctional mess he’d been born into.

That is obviously something that nobody will ever know.

The resolution of the case invites soft language about “closure” and a chance for a shattered community to “heal”, the hope that all the “stakeholders” in the field of child protection can learn from this shocking tragedy.

Without wishing to be too cynical, it’s meaningless sentimentalism unless something more tangible is done to help the children and their battling parents in these communities.

This isn’t to let the mother of Dean Shillingsworth off the hook, or to reflect on the contribution made by the absence of a consistent father figure in this shocking event.

There are plenty of parents out there who are just as poor and uneducated as 27-year-old Rachel Pfitzner, who do not plunge into a life of drug abuse or indolence, who know that bringing up a child is the most important responsibility you will have in your time on earth, whether you’re rich or poor, and who could never defy the most primal instincts to inflict shocking life-ending violence on their own child.

She’ll have it on her conscience for the rest of her days.

But for the rest of the community, we should start to question the Pollyanna reaction we have to these continuing cases of child abuse, where the media and the public express surprise and disbelief at the fact that another child has been lost, when the crushing monotony of the statistics should tell us that there’s nothing surprising or unbelievable about the death of insert-child’s-name-here.

To that end – and again, without eliminating the personal responsibility factor or the question of lifestyle choice– we need to examine the way in which people can be condemned to live in an irreparably dysfunctional state, where the rest of society almost actively tells them that they’re forgotten and discarded.

There are two pieces of writing which make the point – one went specifically to the death of Dean Shillingsworth, the other was published just a few days ago and gave the most terrible demonstration of how government and the broader community can consign a group of people to the garbage heap.

The first was by The Daily Telegraph’s Michelle Cazzulino, who visited the duckpond at the Mandurama Reserve in the suburb of Ambervale, where Dean’s body was found. (Unfortunately there is no weblink.)

Michelle wrote about how this tiny pond in a very basic suburban park was the one part of the community where people had always felt they could come to play with the kids but, because of his death, were now staying away, save for the one simple, moving gesture of making a final visit to leave some flowers where he was found.

Michelle went back to the park a year after Dean’s death and spoke to the locals again. She wrote:

“At the reserve a portrait of the smiling two-year-old was tied to a tree just three weeks ago. Already the photo has been ruined by the elements, Dean’s angelic features blurred. Preparations are being finalised for a more permanent memorial – a stone bearing his face and name will be laid during a service on Saturday night, while plans are also underway for a time capsule to be buried on the spot.”

Even the simple act of remembering the boy with a memorial was an arduous 14-month task for this community.

The second piece was by Paul Kent and was published just last Saturday and had no direct relationship to the Shillingsworth case. It looked at the forgotten suburb of Claymore, which has a similar profile of poverty and neglect to where Dean lived, where child abuse and neglect through alcohol and drug abuse is a comparable problem.

Kent’s visit was prompted by the revelation that – due to a triumph of the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet over the human faculty of reason – this busted suburb with run-down schools had failed to win a single cent from the Federal Government’s $1.5 billion fund for disadvantaged schools.

He described a place where the council doesn’t bother to mow the lawns, where average wages are $530 a week (in Campbelltown it’s $1156), where a staggering 97 per cent of people live in public housing, an appalling mix which is a sure-fire way to entrench poverty, and where one of the few local industries involves the tradies who board up smashed windows with plywood to stop local kids from firebombing them.

In a bland and matter of fact way, long-standing local resident Ken Jordan told Kent that the community regarded the sound-proofing of the six-lane M5 motorway – or rather the lack thereof – as a clear indication of how Claymore was regarded by the government and the rest of Sydney.

He described how the sound barrier runs through Campbelltown, stops when it gets to Claymore, and starts again as the M5 makes it way into more affluent suburbs.

“I don’t think I’ll be voting for them next time,” Ken Jordan said of the State Government.

Why the hell should he. It’s hard to imagine a purer form of government evil than this decision, which must have been made consciously as a cost-saving measure inside a department, and went either unrecognised or ignored by the relevant minister.

It’s the kind of thing which exposes the hysterical nimbyism we find in the inner-city over issues such as access to parks, in areas where in comparative terms, parks abound, for the middle-class conceit that it is.

It also challenges the conduct and priorities of government in having a kind of “manageable neglect” approach to poor communities, where they know that people’s expectations are so low that they can keep on disappointing them.

And it should force some deeper, ongoing thinking about whether the rest of us can structure our lives to do something for those communities where kids are at risk, where many of them have never had a book read to them, or don’t have a safe place to do their homework, and turn these suburbs into something other than places you drive past at 110km/h on your way down to a weekend buying antiques and devonshire teas in the Southern Highlands.

Most commented

13 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • EA says:

      08:33am | 19/08/09

      Child deaths in any circumstances are always tragic and in these, even more so because it is failure of our society to encourage good parenting, provide good role models and build a healthy society where these things are less likely to happen.The lack of a father figure for children is still unacknowledged as important and necessary.The baby bonus has had a very destrcuctive effect on an already volatile situation for young women particularly those with mental health problems. Being brought up by parents who are inadequate has a knock on effect down the generations, the ‘cycle of deprivation’ is still with us and some live it every day.

      Others don’t survive it beyond childhood or the teenage years.

      Nevertheless there is still choice and as we have seen from some well known examples, not everyone ends up a child murderer living in poverty and desperation.

      Perhaps we need to give help in learning to make effective choices and break the victim cycle.

    • Ben from Perth says:

      11:02am | 19/08/09

      Paragraph 2 is one of the most touching and thought provoking paragraphs I’ve read on The Punch.

      In a society which is becoming increasingly insular and increasingly putting the responsibility of growing communities on the government’s shoulders, it’s time for us all to reach out and start doing a little bit more in our own circle of influence.

    • David C says:

      11:12am | 19/08/09

      Treat people like dirt and guess how they will act.
      If only we could get the latte/chardonnay socialists of Mosman and Vaucluse to many divert some of their “feel good” charitable donations to the “third world’ to their own backyard.

    • joe says:

      01:02pm | 19/08/09

      I agree with you totally David C. (This is also why these latte socialists love Global Warming and ETS talk - they don’t have to get their hands dirty to “save the planet”, just pay a little more for their lattes.)

    • joe says:

      01:04pm | 19/08/09

      We need to do all that we can to strengthen marriages and families (not bring in new options and pretend they are just as good.) and extended families also.

    • Concerned Aussie says:

      03:45pm | 19/08/09

      What were the state and federal members of parliament does for their electorate? The members that represent the suburb of Ambarvale are Phillip Costa (ALP) Wollondilly NSW & Pat Farmer (LP) Macarthur Federal. I thought it was their job to represent their constituents. Members of parliament are an important component of a community and they should be working for and assisting these people. What are they doing to drive change in their electorates? If things are not getting done, e.g. council not mowing lawns, then it would seem to me that these two gentlemen (more so Phillip Costa) are not doing their job and they should be exposed accordingly!  Or do they only ever come out to visit these folks as an election is approaching.  I don’t live in the inner city, but if there is an imbalance between the inner city and whatever then whose job is it to “get the right balance”, I seem to hear that expression a lot nowadays.

      The same applies to the members of parliament that represent Claymore.

    • Steve B says:

      04:22pm | 19/08/09

      It would have to have been a particularly dedicated teacher (public or private) to be able to see the signs of neglect 3 years before Dean started school, he was 2 after all. The point is still valid that hopefully someone (community nurse, doctor, social worker) could have noticed the signs and investigated.

      It would also help to acknowledge that the majority of parents who do fall into drug abuse (legal or illegal) and/or indolence will also never defy those primal instincts to protect their children from harm. Parental drug abuse may be a contributing factor in cases like this, in some cases no doubt it would be the main factor but the above piece seems to infer that there is no exclusivity of the two. It is that attitude that a parent with a drug issue is automatically neglectful and/or abusive that prevents many of those parents from seeking treatment for fear of either criminal charges (if some or all of their drug use is illicit) or having their children removed from them, or both. It is also this fear of punishment over treatment that in some instances prevents friends or extended family members reporting less serious cases to authorities for fear that the intervention could be worse for the child than the original problem and see themselves lose access to the very kids they were trying to help.

    • Andrew says:

      05:33pm | 19/08/09

      Penbo im sad to say i doubt this story will get many hits and im even surprised they ran woth it on 2GB, i am one of the many (but never noticed) adults that spent their childhood growing up in an area that people often refer to as a sh*thole that came out the other end untouched. My parents were regular folk that just didn’t have a great deal of money but the love was always there as was the knowledge of a need for a good education, and as a result of such i didn’t fall into the poverty trap. It was a medium size suburb in Mt Druitt where the poverty cycle roams free, its a cycle id love to see broken but how when the majority of society sneer at those less fortunate. I really do believe the key is to get these kids out there into school but not a school of conventional means, these kids just wont go, just think, you break the cycle in one, just one generation and you change the attitude towards the future. The kids of these suburbs grow up being told their scum and will never amount to anything so thats exactly what they do, its a sad sight to see having lived there and knowing that as a whole the community cares for one another. We need to get this message out there that these areas can be turned around and the cycle of poverty and a life of petty crime can be broken. (feel free to email me with thoughts or plans to get a turn around in motion as im more than ready to put my hand up and help those less fortunate than me)

    • Dan says:

      06:12pm | 19/08/09

      Or maybe David C and Joe, you can do it yourself! Instead of attacking others for not giving charity or not getting their hands dirty, maybe you can give charity yoursef and get your own hands dirty. Or perhaps it’s easier to attack and generalise about people who live in a different suburb to you!

    • Heléna says:

      08:51pm | 19/08/09

      and there she wrote - 97%!! :o that is asking for nothing but trouble
      we as a society deserve everything we get - how tragic!

    • David C says:

      08:55pm | 19/08/09

      Dan, Dan, Dan relax buddy. What makes you think I dont give already ie 100% to local charities as opposed to overseas ones. Where did I say I dont live in one of those suburbs and what makes you jump to the conclusion I dont already help out?
      Bad day at work was it?

    • Dan says:

      10:41pm | 19/08/09

      David C, considering I didn’t attack people for being ‘latte/chardonnay socialists’, I think you should look in the mirror when you say
      Bad day at work was it?’ Nonetheless,  my original point stands. Regardless of where you live, you have no right to call anyone a latte/chardonnay socialist. How do you know what money they give to cahrity, adn who are you to tell them what they should do with their money? You should look in the mirror and you should stop throwing stones in glass houses.

      Oh, and when you refer to ‘latte/chardonnay socialists of Mosman and Vaucluse’, it’s a pretty fair assumption that you don’t live there, unless you’re talking about yourself. And as for assuming that you don’t help out, I don’t make any assumptions, I just tihnk you should mind your own business and concentrate on your own ‘charity giving’ before you attack other people.

    • David C says:

      09:33am | 20/08/09

      I guess this is why this site is called “ThePunch”

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@nigelmcbain I don't see the nexus between gay marriage and gay sex education in schools. ACL does. Health issues should be taught whatever

Daniel Piotrowski

@jennijenni a few companies are known to do that - ask for story ideas from job applicants so they can steal them later

Malcolm Farr

: Bruce Springsteen: "I get roughed up crowdsurfing… people try to pull chunks out of me" http://t.co/jiHqt8agt9” it was him, @patricklion

Daniel Piotrowski

Ray Hadley fires back at Carlton. Great @candacesutton1 get: http://t.co/7fQzk4Xixh

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter