Books are for old people

I borrowed my first book from the University library the other day. I realise that doesn’t really seem like a big deal but for me this momentous occasion becomes interesting because I am a third year student. In the three years I’ve been at Monash, I’ve not once borrowed a book until now. In fact, the only time I visit the library is to steal free wifi and there was that one time I forgot my notebook so I had to use the free computers to check Facebook.

But the reason I haven’t borrowed a book before is not because I’m a bad student. I mean, my grades are only average but I think that might have something to do with the number of hours I spend drinking instead of studying.

It got me thinking. Besides the occasional piece of fiction that sits on my bedside table, I don’t read that many books. And I’m not alone. Most of my Gen Y friends are the same and this is probably a trend we’ll see even more prominently in iGen’s (what the ABS are apparently calling people who were born after 1989).

There are more than a few of reasons this is happening. Overlooking the elephants in the room like the fact that nearly everything you need to know is on Wikipedia or can be found with Google or that Gen Y simply prefer to sit on YouTube for a few hours instead of reading a book, there’s a couple other reasons this change is happening.

Audiobooks is the first. Although they’re still in the introductory stage of the product life cycle, they’re growing in popularity. Apple and a website called Audible are the main driver of this who made audiobooks incredibly easy to download and use through iTunes with a sync of your iPod or iPhone. Not only that but they’re cheaper than actual books plus it means I don’t have to carry around a 600 page book in my bag.

The other is Amazon’s Kindle. This is the first electronic book designed with a screen that’s easy on the eyes and is actually easy to use. Admittedly slowly, but it’s making a big impact overseas and the release of Kindle 2 allows you to read newspapers, eBooks, magazines and even blogs as well. You can annotate, draw, highlight, check the dictionary and I realise this is starting to sound like a sales pitch but if you’re sick of reading you can just browse the web or listen to music.

Both of these technologies aren’t just another way to read a book, they’re changing the experience of reading completely. While it might take a few years, the book will soon only be useful for chocking up the uneven table in the living room. Although I admit the fact that in a rare oddity in this world it somehow managed to remain free from advertising, unfortunately, much like it’s ad supported friends the newspaper and the television, the book will eventually die.

To you old people reading this and laughing at the suggestion that such a thing could happen, the simple fact is Gen Y don’t like books. You’re probably thinking that this 19 year old has no idea what he’s talking about because people will always prefer to read something physical or hold something tangible in their hands but you’re wrong. You prefer something physical to read. I do not. You’re old and you’re a traditionalist who prefers the nostalgia of sitting in bed and flicking through pages.

Don’t assume your characteristics and preferences carry on through generations because they don’t. The best part from all this of course is that we should see somewhat of a decline in the number of paper cuts across the globe. I’m not sure on the implications this will have on the band-aid industry. And the lesson we can learn from this is to never to do an Arts uni because it means you actually have to go to the library and borrow a book.

Most commented

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Mark Dawson says:

      05:36pm | 31/05/09

      “To you old people reading this and laughing at the suggestion that such a thing could happen, the simple fact is Gen Y don’t like books. You’re probably thinking that this 19 year old has no idea what he’s talking about because people will always prefer to read something physical or hold something tangible in their hands but you’re wrong. You prefer something physical to read. I do not. You’re old and you’re a traditionalist who prefers the nostalgia of sitting in bed and flicking through pages. Don’t assume your characteristics and preferences carry on through generations because they don’t.”

      Are you serious??? Read a few more books, finish uni, then start making grand claims about the future & generational change.

      And here I was thinking I was actually going to reading something intelligent, or at least be mildly challenged…

    • Rhiannon says:

      06:34pm | 31/05/09

      I have to agree that in the non-fiction arena, books get old very, very fast. Even industry magazines could be 28 days behind the latest news in any given field. That’s useless considering a groundbreaking piece of industry specific info could be on the web, with hi res images, the same day it is created.

      Fiction is a different story. Plain words on paper give enormous license to the imagination, and this will never get old.

    • Emma says:

      07:02pm | 31/05/09

      Yet another video killed the radio star claim. Why must technology be deemed as a replacement instead of an alternative or an enhancement?

      “Don’t assume your characteristics and preferences carry on through generations because they don’t.”

      Don’t assume your characteristics and preferences represent your generation Zac. And if you’re not a good student, maybe you should try learning from those with actual experience instead of wikigoogling your way through a uni degree.

    • the anvil drops says:

      07:22pm | 31/05/09

      well, last time i saw a gen y article quoting wikipedia the information was wrong, and the interviewee pointed that out

      google is not a substitute for research!  also, it’s a symptom of your generational low attention span that getting ‘sick of reading’ is something the technology needs to address.

      i won’t assume my characteristics and preferences carry through the ages but i will assume that your work will be of a lower quality than those who do actual researchy-type stuff while they “do an arts uni”.

      try literacy - it’s good for you!

    • Richard says:

      08:39pm | 31/05/09

      “Overlooking the elephants in the room like the fact that nearly everything you need to know is on Wikipedia”

      Sounds like the blind is leading the blonde here.

    • regina says:

      11:07pm | 31/05/09

      woah ... you can get paper cuts reading books?!

      the only paper cut i ever sustained from a book was while reading a ‘where’s spot?’ lift-the-flap book to a small child many years ago. and even then, i admit i was a barely functioning human being surviving on 4 hours sleep and lots of tea.

      has it really been that long between books for you, zac?

    • Michael says:

      12:07pm | 01/06/09

      Im gen Y, sorry about that but we are what you made us, bit of a fail there parents but anyway, I still read books now and then, mostly fiction and only when my laptop isn’t handy. I don’t visit libraries any more, its a pain in the bum to find anything and putting populist antiwikipedia dribble aside its a very useful site as long as you keep in mind what exactly wikipedia is and how it works. Go search the Gymea Lilly for example it seems fairly accurate to me, and if its wrong you can seek to correct it.

    • the anvil drops says:

      12:58pm | 01/06/09

      ‘we are what you made us’ 

      chant of the eternal buck-passer,

      you have the choice to be whatever you want and you effortlessly fall into the cookie cutter cliche of ‘what you made us’.

      news: you made you.  so any failure would be in your court Michael!

      i cannot count the number of times I have been misdirected by google or given misinformation on wiki. but my point is not that these aren’t useful sites - they clearly are!

      but the objection i place is that convenience breeds laziness and at worst an overly simplistic view.

      when researching, if you choose to place your faith in an algorithm to find the most relevant information - your methodology lacks depth, and any work subsequent to that will be skewed.

      case in point:  the author for the post above states:

      “The simple fact is that Gen Y do not like books:

      no research cited, no sources - just:  “You prefer something physical to read. I do not.”  (therefore by implication all 19 year olds do not)

      lazy, sad and not insightful in the slightest.

      When visiting the library there are hundreds of sources on any given shelf, with an excellent system for finding particular subject areas.  browsing could not be simpler- google would be envious of such accuracy and accessibility.

    • Sara says:

      02:38pm | 01/06/09

      I have been a librarian in a city law firm for 12 years and I cannot tell you the amount of times I have heard “we don’t need books, everything is on the internet”. Yes there is a huge amount of wonderful information on the internet, but you can’t always guarantee it is accurate or authentic…that’s where librarians come in!

      A library is not just a big old building filled with dusty books, its where the librarians are! Librarians are experts in not only finding information in books, but online as well.

      And I can tell you now that I have so many students working here that are still studying who get spoon fed everything at uni and as soon as they are forced to think for themselves…it always the library they come running to.

    • Kate Kendall says:

      07:51pm | 01/06/09

      Nice to see your first post launch on here Zac and yes, the comments are flowing nicely. Certainly living by the flame thrower post!

      I’m not going to say much, other than, I’m Gen Y, I’m a heavy tech-user and that I love books! My analogy is one of the healthy food pyramid – if you want to feed your brain, ditch the tweets/treats once in a while and consume a healthy book meal. It will sustain you much longer that a blog post will and the ideas and knowledge gained will be with you for life!

      Looking forward to the next edition!

    • John Littleboy says:

      03:17pm | 02/06/09

      Sara,  I love (selected) books and find librarians very helpful.  But you may have to help me out here.    Um, spoon fed at Uni,  sure, but why is having a librarian find you a book, and then reading the author’s opinion much different?

      I think people that believe everything they read in a book are fools.  Some tend towards titles that agree with their own bias, and then use the book to push their own agenda.

    • Emma says:

      03:22pm | 02/06/09

      Please don’t be arrogant enough to assume you know what Gen Y wants or thinks, it’s not flattering us as a generation, or yourself.

    • Tom says:

      07:47pm | 02/06/09

      Zac is completely right books piss young people off they will be much less popular in the future.

    • Clare Quilty says:

      11:05pm | 02/06/09

      Always surprised/dismayed to see that (some) members of gen y regard the “books, like, totally suck” position as somehow anti-establishment & rebellious.

      Ironically, some of the best/most influential books/novels ever written are the most challenging, anti-establishment works of art you’re likely to find.

    • Sarah says:

      12:59pm | 03/06/09

      I’m really sad to see that all Zac has done here is reaffirm the typical Gen Y stereotype. I’m a Gen Y, and with all the Gen Y bashing that happens, I expected a little more.Tom, you think that books piss Gen Y off, but I can’t begin to tell you how much this article pissed me off.

      This may sound really lame and more than a bit nerdy, but there is nothing like the the weight of a book in your hands, the texture and the smell of the paper, and the feeling of immersing yourself in a book. Its not just about the content, its about the physicality of the act and its a feeling that no iPhone can replace.

      Maybe you just haven’t found the right book?

    • Yvette says:

      02:40am | 04/06/09

      I’m Gen Y, and this is SUCH a load. I seriously hope this is not representative of what future articles are going to be like from you Zac. This is the exact sort of drivel baby boomer love to jump on so they can smile sardonically and stereotype everyone under 30 in Today Tonight stories. It’s completely inaccurate of the vast majority of young people, and totally infuriating.
      If you need any help in the ‘Nash Library in future, let me know. I spend a couple of hours every day there researching. CAN YOU BELIEVE IT. True story.

    • Scotland Drummond says:

      04:15pm | 05/06/09

      Hey Zac,

      history (NB: can also be found in books) demonstrates time and time again how the onset of new technology is only interesting in so much as the social uses to which that technology is put in relation to existing technological, economic, political and cultural contexts (to name just a few).

      Read the Frankfurt School’s Theodor Adorno discussing the implications of the phonograph [http://graduate.mica.edu/crisis/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/adorno-form-copy.pdf], or Raymond Williams’ exhaustive and amazing ‘Television: Technology as Cultural Form’. Or if you’re genuinely averse to libraries, academic journals and books, read Clay Shirky [http://www.shirky.com/] or Cory Doctorow [http://craphound.com/] and their thoughtful arguments about the media, society and technological progress.

      You will find nuanced, complex sets of arguments that are concerned with technology and the way it interacts with social, political, economic and cultural forces, not an incendiary link-bait blog post adopting caricatured extremes of arguments under the guise of ‘getting the debate started’.

      The debate started ages ago and has been progressing in an informed, intelligent and thoughtful manner for decades. Let’s do it justice and understand the value we can all bring to it.

      Hate to sound sanctimonious mate, but the genuinely curious are usually platform agnostic, happy to develop their understanding of the world from books, blogs, wikis, journals, bulletin boards etc.

      I echo some other commenters here in saying I’m fairly sure you are better than this post and I’m looking forward to reading your future stuff.

      Scotland

    • Ramiel says:

      01:46am | 06/06/09

      i like books; I’m just a few years older than you…

      but being part of the consumable species and a sucker, it’s not just for the nostalgia of feeling papercuts and smelling the bindings of the ol vintage…

      i want, i want, i want!

      i want to absorb info, i want ownership, i want the ‘nostalgia’, i want to dog-ear, graffitti, drip sauce, tear pages, risk loaning, collect dust, appear cultivated… i want to indulge with my money ‘well-spent’....

      :p

      the senses are always the target aren’t they?

      also, you’re missing out if you’ve never seen your tear slowly seep into the velvet pages after weeping over heartfelt words as you’re sitting on the alcove on a cloudy, melancholy afternoon; ignoring plasma sights and sounds, doof-doof boxes and polyphonic cancer-waves…

    • Rachelle says:

      09:32pm | 22/01/10

      Im technacally an iGen or whatever you whant to call my age group. Im 16 and i read a lot and so do most of my friends. I do love fiction but if i can find a non fiction book i like i dont descriminate because its fact as a lot of people assume that it is boring.
      Just like anything else be it television shows movies or books you need to find something you like and will read and not asssume that because it is printed on paper and binded that it is boring.
      So its not just old people that think that books are good.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

ToryShepherd

@benpobjie @jessadamson7 @jhwakelin kinda creepy from a high school cheerleader #misheardlyrics

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter