I’m cycling on a side street crossing a major suburban arterial road in Adelaide.

In Switzerland, crowds line the streets to cheer you on when you cycle. Pic: Michael Klein

At the intersection, I scan left and the traffic is banked up from traffic lights 300 metres away. To my right is a sizeable gap. Off I go.

A shiny 4WD accelerates towards me, closing the gap faster than I thought possible, but nowhere near fast enough for panic.

I’m across and his acceleration turns to fierce breaking as he approaches the banked up queue. He wasn’t trying to kill me, just making a point. He owns the fucking road and I’m no longer in Switzerland but back in the land of super-sized metal assholes and need all my cycling warrior skills to stay alive. How did we get to this?

The bicycle racks at the Rapperswil camping and swimming center on Lake Zurich in Switzerland have mount points for 510 bicycles. Yes, I did count them. There are no marked car parking spaces, but you could park three or four in the little area outside the gate where delivery vans turn around.

This is a centre for children and families. There are wading pools. There is a water slide. There are about 90 permanent large tents complete with outdoor settings and BBQs. How do toddlers get to the centre? And whole families? Is it on a train line? Are there buses?

Achtung velo!

The Swiss call bicycles velos. Any Swiss 5 year old knows to call Achtung Velo as a cyclist approaches any group of walkers.

I laughed when I first saw the 510 velo parking points at Rapperswil. The weather was foul and they were empty like a derelict field of dreams.

We had arrived at the start of a month’s cycle-touring-camping holiday and everything was deserted. The permanent tents were empty. The huge glistening white shower blocks were empty. The place looked like a resort where the promoter had gone bust half way through. The mirage of Christopher Skase floated through my mind.

A month later, at the end of our trip, we returned and the place was buzzing. It was nowhere near full capacity, but the weather was passable and there were a couple of hundred velos. There were velos with little trailers for toddlers. Velos with battery assistance for the not so young. Velos with big knobbly tyres. Velos with skinny racing tyres.

If it’s a nice enough day for a swim, why would you travel by car? That’s how the residents of Rapperswil and surrounding areas think. So that’s how the centre runs and it works. The manager tells us they get 3500 people on a really good day. Rapperswil itself has a population of less then 8000 so people are clearly travelling from surrounding areas.

Rapperswil doesn’t feel like a country town. Nor do the other little urban centres around it. The Swiss call them villages but I often couldn’t tell where one village ended and another began. Likewise, the city-country division is similarly blurred.

On just about any road apart from some in the heart of Zurich, you could find yourself passing a vehicle that looks like a small petrol tanker but smells rather different. These vehicles carry cattle excrement in slurry form around to fertilise the fields. On some days in Switzerland we would smell this for most of the day during a 6 hour ride!

Swiss cities are small. Zurich has a permanent population of less than half the population of Adelaide. Basel is even smaller with just 166,000 people, with the Swiss capital Bern being slightly smaller again. An efficient rail system and bicycle parking at the stations make it possible to commute to the cities from farther afield, and people do.

But Swiss urban centres outside the cities are quite unlike most Australian towns. They are full function living centres.

Embarrassingly, Australia’s biggest bicycle race, the Tour Down Under, often has finish lines in towns around Adelaide which don’t even have a bicycle shop, let alone a theatre, or a hospital, or a real museum.

The Swiss don’t just talk decentralisation, they do it. They have more than twice as many hospitals as NSW despite having a similar population. This isn’t just a matter of public policy, it’s the way people live.

A bicycle shop in a small town around Adelaide must compete with the bigger shops in Adelaide (and, of course, the Internet) because Australians will travel large distances to save small amounts of money.

Few non-service local businesses can survive in such a culture. We found 3 bicycle shops in Rapperswil in 20 minutes despite it being just 35 kms from Zurich, but there are no bicycle shops in Tanunda despite it being twice as far from Adelaide.

In Zurich at peak hour, the traffic in the heart of the city is crazy ... for cars. Many pedestrian crossings having no traffic lights and others can simultaneously give pedestrians and turning vehicles green lights. On the crossings without lights, pedestrians just step out without looking. They don’t do this as a kind of stupid mistake that anybody might make every few years while deeply engaged in mathematical contemplation. No, they just do it because that’s how it’s done in Switzerland. The drivers, somewhat astonishingly, just seem to accept this as a fact of life.

They don’t swear and curse and get out and thump people with car jacks. They also pull up at pedestrian crossings in anticipation. At one point, while on foot, we were busy studying a map and happened to be beside a crossing. It eventually occurred to us that we had caused a dozen cars to pull up. There was nothing for it but to hurry across as if we had meant it.

Australian drivers are great at anticipation also, but it works a little differently here. Ride in a bike land and look even remotely like you want to turn right in Australia. Perhaps even give a hand signal. Pretty soon, cars from 100 metres behind will be accelerating in a rush to preemptively pass.

More thoughtful drivers will slow down leaving their front bumber level with your back wheel and then wonder why you are reluctant to do a suicide turn in front of them. Exasperated and annoyed, they will then race off. In Switzerland, the equivalent action (remember they drive on the other side of the road) will see cars immediately and unbegrudgingly slow down and leave you a good safe distance to turn in front of them.

Cyclists breaking road rules in Australia, even in total safety, can drive normally mild mannered Australians to apoplexy. But Swiss car drivers seem totally unconcerned. It was explained to me that this is because most car drivers are also cyclists. But I have an alternative explanation.

Think about it. A cyclist approaches a red light to turn left (remember they drive on the other side). If nothing is coming, then they just keep going. End of story. Had they obeyed the traffic light the odds are that frequently a car would be behind them or beside them when the light eventually changed. Now there are two vehicles, a car and a bicycle turning left. This impedes the car and puts the cyclist at some risk. So most cyclists just ignore the red light when safe to do so.

The logic relies on cyclists going slow enough to reliably make good decisions on safety. Most are. In any event, the proof of the pudding is in the numbers. Switzerland has a road fatality rate per head of population that is half the European average and about two thirds that of Australia. This is despite (or perhaps because of) many narrow winding dangerous roads.

In a month on Swiss roads riding anything from an hour to eight hours every day, I saw exactly one dangerous hoon driver, I saw a single “altercation”. It involved a delivery van and a cyclist. Both parties were smiling and the whole thing looked more like an ingenious pickup attempt than a real dispute.

Climate change and peak oil will both drive an increase in cycling. Could Australia ever sustain the cultural shift required for a significant increase in cycling? Swiss people told me that the culture isn’t an accident but a result of decades of deliberate policy. Dutch cyclists say the same about Holland.

Interestingly, we met a French couple who go on cycling holidays in Switzerland but never cycle in France. They told us that the French are like Australians, they love cycling sporting heros but want the rest to bugger off.

My post-holiday good humour certainly didn’t take long to bugger off once I was back on Adelaide roads.

80 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • JuzzyD says:

      05:43am | 29/08/11

      What are you babbling about? I lost site of your point when you started rambling about bike shops and parking spots etc. This was one long rambling whinge about Cyclists not being given enough respect.

      Harden up princess, people hate motorcyclists too, try to kill us when they can, but I still strap on a helmet and throw a leg over every day and don’t need to write gigantic articles whining about my poor treatment on the road.

    • trentyn says:

      02:07pm | 29/08/11

      fortunately for the rest of us you dont babble on about how you are happy to keep living dangerously.

    • JuzzyD says:

      03:22pm | 29/08/11

      Spot on Trentyn, I try to be succinct.

    • Budz says:

      03:46pm | 29/08/11

      Cyclists should not be allowed on the road with cars. Simple as that. They give me the sh!ts because they go so slowly and I am also constantly amazed at how dangerous their riding is. I don’t think many of them realise that they are very hard to spot.

    • The Other Phil says:

      04:04pm | 29/08/11

      @Budz - If cyclists shouldn’t be allowed on the road, where should they go? For that matter, where should pedestrians go? They just take up driving time when they cause you to stop at lights or pedestrian crossings. Lets say, for arguments sake, that a registration scheme for bicycles were introduced, and cyclists paid $10 a year to register their bicycle. Would you be happy with them using the full lane (which they are entitled to as it stands), or would they still cause issues?

      An honest question - WHY do you get angry when cyclists are going slowly? I fully agree that there are those who are hard to spot, yet there are also cyclists who have bright lights, reflective clothing, a helmet that meets Australian Standards and ride at a speed that causes minimum distruption on a well maintained bike. I’m truly interested in your response.

    • CJS says:

      06:23am | 29/08/11

      Many Australians are grumpy, ignorant whiners. A lot of us are certainly not the “easy going” type we like to portray. This unhappiness is reflected in our drivers who are always in a hurry, angry on the horn, and generally just seem to be pissed off all the time. Unfortunately as cyclists are the most vulnerable on the road, they are the ones who cop it the most.

      I might add that the whining, bitterness, anger, and grumpiness of the average Australian is also reflected in politics. You would think our country and economy was falling apart but we’ve actually got it pretty good compared to the rest of the world.

    • Matthew says:

      04:56pm | 29/08/11

      “we’ve actually got it pretty good compared to the rest of the world.”  Probably because we get annoyed at small things not being done correctly, being slowed down and people not following the rules that have been proven over the last 300 years or so.

      I’ve always ridden my bike (albeit when I was younger) on the footpath and never had a problem, I *hated* riding it on the road for fear of unnecessarily wrestling with a vehicle much bigger than mine.

    • Gregg says:

      08:00am | 29/08/11

      You no doubt found out just how big Switzerland is compared to Australia, that being one reason for a lot of car travel.
      And Rapperswil does in deed have a train service.

      The Swiss just like a lot of other Europeans live as they do because that is the way the country has developed over quite a few more centuries than Australia and what I would have hoped you could have picked up is that Australian infrastructure is never going to be comparable.

      If you doubt that, then do your population density studies and also look at rainfall while you’re at it.

    • FINK says:

      08:47am | 29/08/11

      Excellent response Gregg. People like Clover Moore and the Author don’t understand that you cannot re engineer 100 years of planning and expansion overnight for a minority of self pompous ignorants. Alot of small business’s are going down the gurgler, not because customers do not want to visit their shops but with the ever increasing bike lanes being built and ever decreasing parking spaces being made available people are just not coming into the city (the hub of Sydney) anymore.

    • Willie Mac says:

      09:12am | 29/08/11

      FINK, you know what will kill them even more? Peak Oil, leading to petrol prices over $2/litre, which will stop most people making long car journeys. Good thing we’re building alternatives like bike lanes though, hey?

    • Warren says:

      09:50am | 29/08/11

      Total rubbish @FINK. Name one business that has has failed because of bike lanes.

      As for a reduction in visitors to the city why don’t you provide some stats to support your argument? Let me guess, because you can’t.

    • FINK says:

      11:09am | 29/08/11

      Willie Mac
      Yeah right Willie! When petrol went over a $1 a litre they predicted the demise of the motorist guess what it didn’t happen and road usage increased. As Sydney sprawls outwards vehicle usage increases. But you are right build bike lanes from the CBD to Penrith / Campbelltown / Central Coast and Wollongong, I can just see all the mums / dads and kids on tricycles flocking into the morning sprawl on their daily journey to school drop off and then off to work! Yep the bikes lanes are a giant success in the CBD, go stand out on the Kent street Cycleway and shake hands with the half a dozen cyclists that use it each day! BTW take your camera with you so you can also snap them breaking all the rules especially when the bike stop light comes on!

    • T Roll says:

      12:12pm | 29/08/11

      Dont feed the Troll

    • Steve says:

      01:07pm | 29/08/11

      FINK, you are a legend. I agree wholeheartedly with all you’ve said.
      I work alongside that Bourke Rd cycleway and it is horrific. Businesses ARE complaining and ARE closing and the street has never been more chaotic. To make matters worse, I regularly see cyclists still using the road rather than Clover’s magic bike lane.
      Cyclists take the moral high ground and frequently state they are the solution. Rubbish. In so many instances they are the problem…

    • trentyn says:

      03:34pm | 29/08/11

      wait, let me get this straight, a street side business, that losses 2-5 (generously) car spots is going out of business because those cars cant park immediately outside anymore.

      sounds to me like darwinism at work.

    • FINK says:

      03:56pm | 29/08/11

      trentyn,
      You must be one of Darwin’s most favoured subjects! Try 3.5 klms of Cycleways on Bourke Road where parking has been removed on one side and reduced on the other, so unless your 2-5 cars are 400 metre long stretch hummers you may not see the relevance to the loss of custom!

    • stephen says:

      08:21am | 29/08/11

      We’ve dumbed ourselves down too much to worry about bicycles .. unless of course the Tourism Industry can get a whiff of an advertizing angle, say, the first person who can ride around an open cut gets a free pass to a koala park, sort of thing.
      Yer dreamin geoff.

      PS And the tourists have gone forever. Best keep digging holes in the ground.

    • FINK says:

      08:23am | 29/08/11

      All those years ago Roads were built for horse / carriage and then for cars. Back when I was young a lot of cyclists knew this and respected the fact that being hit by a car would end in more than just a punctured tyre. Back in the good ol’ days the cyclist would share the footpaths with pedestrians and mutual respect between all was shared! If the cyclist looked like they were affecting traffic flow they would move to the footpath. But then something changed in the cogs of mobility, I don’t know if it was due to some toxic shock syndrome from the new bright coloured Lycra affecting the neurons of the cyclist or the sucking in of the ever increasing polluted air as they exasperate in their efforts to try to get their 2 wheels up to 30kmph. Maybe if the carbon tax was brought in 20 years ago the problems of cyclist vs car would not exist today! but something changed the cyclists became impatient   , self important, instead of being in tune with the pedestrian they began to knock them over like a split packet of skittles. The cyclists started to hate the pedestrians, the pedestrians were in fear of hearing the whine and howling gasps of an approaching cyclist! So the cyclists moved ever increasingly to the roads, they first start riding in the gutter, slowing encroaching ever so sneakily further onto sacred bitumen that was built for heavier fuelled vehicles (if roads were built for bikes they would be 1/7 the size and no bitumen required) so now the cyclists as they did with pedestrians try to take over the roads / however they made one slight miscalculation they can’t knock over cars and the drivers of these cars who were once pedestrians and for years put up with being abused by cyclists are getting their own back.
      Karma, I call it.

    • marley says:

      09:10am | 29/08/11

      Interesting take.  Where I come from (Canada) cyclists were never allowed to mix with pedestrians on footpaths - bicycles were always considered to fall under the rules of the Motor Vehicles Act,  and restricted to roads and cycle paths.  And motor vehicles just had to learn to cope with the concept that the roads are not for their exclusive use.  Mind you, cyclists also had to learn that, contrary to Mr. Russell’s view, they too are obliged to obey the rules of the road.

    • Warren says:

      09:57am | 29/08/11

      Nonsense. Bicycles have always been on the roads. In fact they were using them before cars were invented. It’s a myth to suggest they used footpaths back in the ‘good ol days.’.

    • The Other Phil says:

      10:16am | 29/08/11

      @FINK - It might surprise you to know that the roads we all are legally allowed to enjoy were fought for by none other than those pesky cyclists on the road. Here’s a story about the Good Roads Movement from the US (a mighty car producing superpower at one point in time):

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Roads_Movement

      However, until all groups of road users learn to obey the road rules all the time (I saw two cars run red lights within 5 minutes on Victoria Rd in Sydney the other night), no one is able to start criticising the other group, because none have a leg to stand on.

    • FINK says:

      11:39am | 29/08/11

      Marley,
      The City Of Sydney council has now even introduced a blue line on the footpaths so that pedestrians are aware that cyclists are about to collect them! Fortunately like all these so called bike lanes no one actually uses them so for now the pedestrians are safe! The worse thing the footpaths have these thick ugly blue lines all over them. Rate Payers money being used exclusively for the latte sipping minority.

    • FINK says:

      11:40am | 29/08/11

      Warren,
      Take your training wheels off and grow up will you.

    • The Other Phil says:

      12:11pm | 29/08/11

      @FINK - Have you been hit by a cyclist or something? You seen to have this seething rage for people riding bicycles which, from what you write, seems to border on obsession. If you have had incidents, then that’s quite unfortunate. I’ve been hit by two cars (one while riding a bicycle on the shoulder of a road that sees very little use yet regularly has cyclists on it, and the other by a driver who was speeding and failed to yield at a Give Way sign), which should entitle me to wield unending hatred towards drivers, but I don’t. I just ride and drive more carefully.

      I’m just wondering so I can get a handle on where you’re coming from, away from all the rage.

      Those “latte sippers” of the minority are also rate payers, and thus, their money has also been spent on these blue lines.

      Additionally, here is a link to an overview of the funding of roads:

      http://www.lgsa.org.au/www/html/315-road-funding-and-management.asp

    • FINK says:

      01:16pm | 29/08/11

      The Other Phil
      So because I don’t tow the minority line I am in rage? hmmm, methinks you just can’t accept the fact that the current arterial bikeways are a waste of time and money and all they do is further clog up the city roads for the amusement of couple of cyclists but your self inflated ego won’t let you accept that! So lets just make aspersions on each other based on their opinion. $7m for the 3.2km Bourke Road cycleway hardly used, good value? yeah sure! Even now Clover Moore distances herself from that white elephant and it has been proven that it is more dangerous :
      http://www.sustainablesydney.net/Bourke Street Cycleway.htm
      I am not against cyclists (I really do not care about them or have any time for them)  I just wish that an amenable and sensible solution would be introduced not the current “We will build a bikeway no matter the impact and they the cyclists will come! We hope”! Do you know that they Council is still completing the Kent St Cycleway that will intersect over 20 driveways and remove the only pickup point for young children where parents have line of sight to the St Andrews School? So you cyclists don’t even care about the well being and safety of young children as long as a dozen of you get the right to ride on your own private road the rest of the world and the safety of children can go get stuffed! How’s that for rage! As for your two bike accidents well you should be a little bit more careful! as motorbike rider I would have seen that coming!

    • The Other Phil says:

      02:19pm | 29/08/11

      @FINK - I’m not claiming you to be in a minority or not - I was simply using a phrase from a post you made (the quote: “Rate Payers money being used exclusively for the latte sipping minority.”), which seemed to be dismissive and implying that a group of people don’t pay rates, or shouldn’t receive rate payers money. That’s all.

      I’m completely aware that there are some bike lanes in the city that just shouldn’t have been built - I’ve never mentioned being for or against them in any way, so your assumption there is baseless. I was asking honestly if you’d had any run-ins with cyclists that created ill-will towards them, because even now you still seem angry. I’m not looking to get a rise out of you - I’m looking to understand your point of view. I’m not sure how my ego fits into this conversation, so lets keep this as objective as possible.

      Your “rage” of cycleways being built because those that ride bicycles don’t even care about child safety is ridiculous. I could just as easily say “Drivers don’t care about cyclists safety because they want to tear up all the bike paths” in a fit of rage. You’re looking for a solution - what would you do if you had the resources to create one? In an ideal situation, I would rather have the personal behaviour of all road users improve so safety of everyone is paramount. Additionally, all road users would acknowledge that all users have a right, as mandated by the RTA, to use a full lane of the road. Of course, this is perhaps a little too idealistic.

      My two accidents - one was on a bicycle, and I was following the rules. The driver wasn’t. The second one was in a car. I was traveling at the speed limit through an intersection and the car coming through the intersection failed to give way while speeding - the only way I could have avoided it was if I was not driving a car at that point in time. I’ll gladly give you a copy of the accident report if you’d like to see all the facts. I’ve no problem with providing you with the information and show that I was, in fact, being careful.

    • Hermano says:

      09:58am | 30/08/11

      FINK, you are a troll of the highest order.  Congrats.

    • Craig says:

      11:03am | 30/08/11

      Cycling infrastructure is much cheaper than road infrastructure.  So $7m spent on 3km of bikeway is money well spent.  The important thing for councils is to continue the good work and fill in the missing links.  If you doubt the cost / benefit arguments of providing cycling infrastructure, check out the following .. http://www.cyclingresourcecentre.org.au/page/economic_benefits_of_cycling

    • Mike L says:

      08:35am | 29/08/11

      In Europe ( I’ll use UK as the example coz they drive on same side as us), There is a strongly enforced law to be in the left hand lane unless you’re currently overtaking or turning right. If you just sit in the right hand lane you will have lost your license within a week.  Here we have the same law but only over 90km/h zones and it’s not enforced anyway. Thus slow drivers, utes, trucks etc block both lanes causing constant frustration for car drivers. How many times have you been driving to work and been stuck behind two trucks having a crawling race… By this point you’re half way to work and your frustration is mounting and suddenly there’s a pack of cyclist in all the gear riding 2-3 abreast and effectively blocking an entire lane, whilst there’s a truck blocking the right hand lane…...

      Quite simply Aussie road rules cause frustration, especially at peak time, and cyclists are the lowest of the food chain, it’s not directly their fault although there are some i’ve seen that also cycle like they own the road.

      They’re akin to Scooters… If a motorbike lane splits to the front of a set of traffic lights it’s irritating because he’s able to do that… but lights change and he’s gone… Scooters try the same thing and they really irk you because the lights change and they crawl off to a whopping 55km’h and hold everyone up.

    • JuzzyD says:

      10:58am | 29/08/11

      That’s the mentality that astounds me. “It’s annoying cause he is able to do that.”

      Truth be told, so can you, get a bike licence and a bike and you’re all set. We filter and it protects us from being rear ended, and takes us out of the queue aiding in the flow of traffic, where we would otherwise be another one sitting in a car in that queue. Never understood the “OMG NO FAIR YOU CANT DO THAT CAUSE I HAD TO WAIT” attitude of drivers who get annoyed and try to block you etc etc. Ever seen a photo of a rear ended bike from some scone headed nonce who was too busy texting their BFF to see you and pull up in time? Not pretty.

      Drivers don’t pay attention, and I don’t wanna be sitting somewhere vulnerable. Last week there was an accident, the traffic came to a stop, I’m glad I was watching the mirrors, because my straddling the double lines was the difference between my being under the 4wd and my being next to a 4wd on a single lane road. But apparently I was in the wrong, cause I crossed double lines. It seems the same people deriding cyclists for breaking a law here and there are the same people who constantly bleat about personal responsibility.

    • Bilby says:

      09:53am | 29/08/11

      It’s not bike riders that motorists hate, it’s alternatives. You’ve got an awesome beard there Geoff. Lot’s of people can’t stand that. Don’t know why. I reckon you probably use trouser clips as well. The hide!! Get a hair cut ya hippy wink

    • Bemused says:

      10:27am | 29/08/11

      You lost me with the “shiny 4WD” reference.  Whether it was a large car or clean or dirty has no relevance for your argument regarding motorists and cyclists co-habitating.  It was a swipe designed to portray a type of driver/vehicle and unnecessary.  (and for the record, I am not a 4WD driver).

    • Geoff Russell says:

      10:27am | 29/08/11

      “hold everyone up” ... that’s the difference. Swiss drivers (based on a month in 2011 and another month in 2003) just don’t mind. They don’t act like getting to their destination as fast as possible is a matter of global importance. And there attitude is infectious. Just as our snarling impatience is similarly so.

    • marley says:

      11:00am | 29/08/11

      Swiss drivers generally don’t have an hour or so commute each way.  Hell, in an hour you’re likely to be in Italy or France.  You’re not comparing like with like.

      It would be more instructive to compare bicycle etiquette in North America and Australia, where the distances are long, the cities large, and the tax base per/km much smaller.

    • Geoff Russell says:

      12:55pm | 29/08/11

      Swiss have plenty of long commutes, but they do them by train. We have chosen to run down our rail in favour of roads. The Swiss have very deliberately gone in the other direction.  Visit a Swiss train station and you will see hundreds of bicycles ... nobody drives a car to the station. So people sit on the train and arrive at work relaxed instead of stressed out and irritable.  We have chosen to make public transport a second class citizen. We have chosen suburban sprawl over planning and medium density living. We have chosen McMansions with boundary to boundary concrete despite knowing about peak oil and climate change issues for over 20 years.  It’s like we deliberately choose stupid and irrational responses whenever faced with a problem. e.g., We replace small schools with big ones so that kids can’t walk and cycle to school but increasingly have to get driven. This is one driver of our childhood obesity problem. We call big schools efficient ... and pay the price in increased health care. 

      Could I compare like with like? I don’t travel much (I feel way too guilty about creating the GHG emissions), but I have been to Toronto ... and it looks like a total nightmare from a cycling/transport perspective, just like Australia.

    • Bilby says:

      01:27pm | 29/08/11

      You’re not helping the cause Geoff. I’m all for increased cycling infrastructure, but putting shit on everyone else won’t achieve that. For a cyclist, as you well know, the biggest problem facing us on the roads is not the lack of cycle ways or too many McMansions, or 4WDs, it’s the inability of cyclists and motorists to see each others point of view. You are no better than the most rabid motorist. Thanks for nothing.

    • marley says:

      01:38pm | 29/08/11

      @Geoff - Switzerland is a small country, with compact cities and short distances between them.  Australia is a huge country, with sprawling cities and long distances between them.  The challenges of building and maintaining adequate rail infrastructure are quite different.  That’s not to say that we haven’t made a balls up of infrastructure, because we have, but it is to say that even if we’d done everything exactly right we still wouldn’t have a system comparable to the commuter rail systems of Europe. 

      And, like it or not, people like to live in McMansions in the burbs.  Planning for infrastructure, cycle paths or whatever, needs to take that reality into account, not try to force people into units in the city.

      And while I can’t speak for Toronto (except that they have a very good subway system), I do know that Vancouver is far more cycle-friendly than Sydney.  For that matter, so is Ottawa, enough so that people commute by bike in minus 20 weather.  You need to look at what they’re doing, not what Zurich is doing, if you want to start changing things.

      That’s why I’m suggesting that you look at situations that are comparable.

    • marley says:

      04:21pm | 30/08/11

      @Geoff - PS maybe you should visit BC sometime - you could check out how things are done there, and assuage your carbon guilt with the knowledge that it’s much closer than Switzerland, and powered almost entirely by hydroelectricity.  And from BC, take a couple of months and bicycle to Newfoundland.  My sister did.

    • Jean says:

      10:58am | 29/08/11

      So your cyclists treat pedestrrians the way the 4WD driver treated you? Yep, that’s how it happens.
      Cycling is the ultimate form of private transport, with the most annoying participants being sanctimonious cultists who demand right of way on both roads and footpaths.
      Switzerland aside, a popular example of the benefits of belonging to the cycling cult goes on about how great cycling is in Amsterdam. Unless you are a pedestrian in Amsterdam, that is- sworn at, spat on, or shoulder-charged for daring to be on the same path used by the bikes (which is often one of those things they used to call “footpaths”). Sound familiar, Australian pedestrians?
      At last the astonishing benefits Australian governments and councils have been giving to the bicycle cult seem to be diminishing-
      Perhaps public, not private, transport may now get some more attention and funding.

    • Martin says:

      09:37pm | 21/09/11

      So, you were in Amsterdam and got sworn at, spat on and shoulder charged for walking on the cycle lane? No wonder, last time I checked the laws over here specifically prohibit doing that… you’re lucky you didn’t get fined!

      We have sidewalks for pedestrians (where you aren’t allowed to cycle), use those when walking.

    • Burko says:

      11:00am | 29/08/11

      Why cant Australia be more like Switzerland…...for starters arent they a really, really tiny country? My weekly kilometres, just going too and from work add up to just shy of 1000. Try doing that on a bike with a four and a one year old and all the gear they need, let alone the crap I need for work. Sounds like a barrell of laughs. Also the Swiss govt dont like cars. Motor sport has been banned there for ages and dont they have a zero tolerance policy in regard to road law….one driving offence=gaol?, so that could be the reason for the low fatality rate, maybe. Nothing to do with caring for bike riders or fellow motorists it could be theyre just shit scared of going to gaol.
      So if you want Oz to be like the land of clocks and chocolate all you need to do is put us in the drier for a couple of thousand years on hot, tell all the motor heads that their favorite sport is now a no go and send anyone who breaks road law to gaol…....that also includes your man who turns left though the red light on his treadlie….or better still, next time you go to one of your bike friendly countries just stay there. Sound like you have more fun there anyway.

    • Nathan says:

      01:13pm | 29/08/11

      Why in the world do you live nearly 100km from work?

      People (and I’m not saying you, you might have your reasons, but generally speaking) , keep moving further and further out, trying to score cheap housing, and then complain like mad about commute times, the amount they spend on petrol, and lack of transport options. Do they ever realise that is the reason why they get their house so cheap? Surely it makes more sense to live closer, ditch the second car, and cut your one hour car commute to a 10min bike ride.

    • Bilby says:

      01:39pm | 29/08/11

      Nathan - If you are lucky enough to have a job 10 minutes by bike from your home, well good on you. Living the dream. What is it that you do for a crust that has so much local work? Maybe I should investigate.

    • Burko says:

      02:27pm | 29/08/11

      @ Nathan, Im lucky enough to live in a town with some of the most breathtaking natural beauty in Oz. We also have some great place to grab a feed and the live music we get at any of the five “locals” I get to choose from is fantastic and I couldnt ask for a more eclectic or nice family of neighbours. I wouldnt trade where I live for all the rice in China. 
        Never will anyone hear me complain about the amount of k’s I do a week. I love to drive, and I love the car I do it in. Its a thirsty monster as well, about $100 a week, but once again, no complaining as I choose to drive it, Im not forced. It also affords me the opportunity to spend an extra 1 1/2hrs with my kids everyday. Try putting a price on that.
        It makes no sense for me to move 10mins from work as the suburb I work in quite frankly sucks, and in my opinion so do the ones surrounding,so I wouldnt be a happy camper and getting my kids around on a bike, as mentioned, above would still be somewhat of an issue.
      I live 100 odd k’s from work because work doesnt rule my life and because I want to live in a town with a little “soul” and be happy…...and because I also get to say at parties”.....No, I dont live in Sydney”

    • Nathan says:

      03:32pm | 29/08/11

      @Bilby, it’s not about being “lucky enough”. It’s just a matter of prioritising some things over others. Our household income isn’t particularly high, but by only having one car, and hardly ever driving it, means we have the money to spend a bit more on our place.

      @Burko That’s great that you’re happy with the tradeoffs living in what must be a lovely spot. As long as people accept those tradeoffs, I have no problem with them!

    • Bilby says:

      04:04pm | 29/08/11

      Nathan - You’re quite right now that I think about it. It’s only because I won’t do menial work for shit pay that I have to travel for work. It’s only because I prefer not to shift my kids around to different schools and ask my wife to change jobs that we stay where we are. It’s only because I like my big house on a big block with the smell of the salt air that I moved where I am in the first place. I see it all now. So… simple.

    • Nathan says:

      04:23pm | 29/08/11

      @Bulby, as I said, it’s priorities. If having a big house on a big block near the salt air, and having your kids go to a particular school is a priority for you, then by all means live where you are. But by choosing to live so far out, you lose any right to complain about commuting times, lack of transport and lack of services. They’re the trade offs.

    • Bilby says:

      04:39pm | 29/08/11

      Sorry Nathan. I deliberately left stuff out so that you could hang yourself with your own prejudices. Shouldn’t have done it, but then if you didn’t have such prejudices, it wouldn’t have worked.

      As it is, I live in the eastern suburbs. Every service I need, nice little public primary school for my kids, everything we could want. The fact is that when you work in biomedical engineering (as I do), the jobs are few and far between. There isn’t a job near me, let alone one that is available. Your view of the world is somewhat limited methinks.

    • Nathan says:

      05:01pm | 29/08/11

      Bilby, my only prejudice is against people who think they can have their cake and eat it too. If someone choses to get the big house for little money by moving to the edge of the urban sprawl, they have to realise their are drawbacks involved. As I said to Burko, if you’re happy living further out, and don’t have a problem with your commute, then I have no problem with you. That’s your lifestyle choice. But it’s one that should be discouraged if possible.

    • michael says:

      11:06am | 29/08/11

      All I want to be able to do is get around town without feeling like my life is in some complete arseholes hands.

      It really doesn’t seem like much to ask does it?

    • centurion48 says:

      11:35am | 29/08/11

      I hear you, Geoff, and know your pain. Until there is zone-based charging for car use (higher charge the closer to the centre of population/business) there will never be significant progress. Monitoring is easy using existing technology (e.g. RFID or GPS data loggers)
      Australians have proven, and continue to prove, that self-interest is all that matters. If it means modifying their behaviour for the community good then it just ain’t going to happen. The use of motor vehicles for journeys less than 5 km needs to be banned except where no public transport exists.
      Many more bicycle parking areas need to be installed in shopping precincts at the expense of car parking spots to reinforce the intent. Multi-lane roads should have the left lane exclusively for use of bicycles (except during peak periods on business days when they can share with bikes).
      @MikeL cited the UK. Well, they also have tax deductibility for bicycle commuters. Carrots and sticks is what is required but very few politicians have the guts to impose anything that might be a daily reminder affecting their re-election.

    • Bemused says:

      11:53am | 29/08/11

      “The use of motor vehicles for journeys less than 5 km needs to be banned except where no public transport exists.”

      Humour me and tell us how you would enforce that.

    • trentyn says:

      03:46pm | 29/08/11

      @bemused

      he did:
      Monitoring is easy using existing technology (e.g. RFID or GPS data loggers)

    • Bilby says:

      04:30pm | 29/08/11

      trentyn - How would you use RFID to enforce a 5km zone around someone home? You obviously know how this stuff works. Secondly, have you considered the privacy implications of tracking someone’s every move using a GPS logger? I can’t see that one flying. Everything’s easy until you actually think about it.

    • James says:

      11:45am | 29/08/11

      I’m not really sure about the idea that people live too far from their work to ride. I have only started riding to work this year. I live 18kms away from work and it only takes me about 40 minutes each way. I’d be interested to see some stats on how far our population is commuting.

    • DanielS says:

      04:44pm | 29/08/11

      you’re faster than me. i live 15kms from work, and it takes me 50 mins to ride. still worth it though.

    • Jono says:

      12:40pm | 29/08/11

      If I’m gonna be on two wheels in traffic I’ll take 100 horsepower over 1 manpower.  Honestly, as a motorcyclist I cannot believe the danger road cyclists put themselves in.  I feel vulnerable on by motorbike at the best of times so why on earth someone would want to take to the urban traffic jungle on a 7kg piece of chome-moly is beyond me.

    • PW says:

      07:17pm | 29/08/11

      Jono, get on your motor bike and ride along the Putty Road from Windsor to Singleton (NSW) some time. Maybe you will notice lots of little crosses with flowers by the side of the roads, mostly on the winding parts. They have been put there by the loved ones of motorcyclists who have come unstuck in a big way. Not cyclists, mind you, but motorcyclists. Motorcyclists (and I am one as well as a cyclist and a car driver) are immensely over-represented in road fatalities.

      Now what was it you were saying about bicycles being dengerous?

    • Steve says:

      12:59pm | 29/08/11

      I agree, Bemused…
      I was forced - purely for economic reasons - to relocate 40+ kilometres from work to live in a part of Sydney (the much-neglected north-west) that has pathetic public transport options. Driving is my only legitimate option if I want to keep work commute times below 2hrs a day (and have a family who recognises me when I get home at night).
      The car-use or congestion tax is a narrow-minded concept at best. Not everyone who works in the CBD is earning bucketloads, you know…

    • Baz says:

      01:57pm | 29/08/11

      Australia is so backward!!

    • Seth Brundle says:

      03:21pm | 29/08/11

      After a recent visit to Ethiopia I was introduced to an entirely different way of life where people do not use cars, or bicycles for any of their transport.  They walk.  Ideally, we would ban all cars AND bicycles.  We could install showers at all destinations to allow people to wash off when they arrive at work or at the shops.  We could tax cars and bicycles out of existance.  Roads and cycle paths would be for the sole use for pedestrians.  Imagine all the health problems that would be cured if everyone had to walk, not to mention how much more safe wakling is than driving or cycling.  Its surely the way forward.  If Ethiopia can do it, so can we.

    • marley says:

      07:23pm | 29/08/11

      Nice troll. 

      Oh, and you’ve never been to Ethiopia in your life.

    • papachango says:

      12:34pm | 30/08/11

      lol - the ghost of Alene Composta rises?

    • JamesH says:

      05:01pm | 29/08/11

      Anyone can be a nuisance on the roads.  On the weekend I was approaching a red light and the guy behind me suddenly changed lanes, accelerated ahead of me and swung into the gap between me and the car in front, forcing me to brake hard.  I beeped at the driver and he stuck his arm out the window to give me a gesture.  Others weave in and out of traffic, and motorcyclists go between cars to get to the front of the queue at red lights. 

      I might add, the impatient driver was far from being a P plate teen, he looked like quite a senior man.  On my drive, I saw about a dozen near misses as people narrowly avoided clipping those in front or behind with dangerous and sudden lane changes with little to no signalling.  The cause of all the issues is impatience.  Roads are congested seven days a week now, and every driver is out for themselves and getting to their destination - everyone else be damned.  Even walking I’ve nearly been run down by idiots who turn corners while pedestrians have green signals (you’re only allowed to complete your turn when they are out of the way safely).  It’s a miracle there aren’t more fatalities on our roads.  Anything that can reduce vehicular traffic must be a good thing, as it will save lives.  Better public transport, imposing of limitations on driving in congested cities and more bicycles.  Yes, I said more and I hate cyclists on the road too!  I just hate impatient and ignorant road users a lot more.

    • qwerty says:

      06:37pm | 29/08/11

      Wow, it is so true about being more aware of bikes as a driver - once you’ve spent a little bit of time using a bicycle yourself. I am hilariously courteous now because i know how scary it can be! (I’m an absolute novice, am riding 7km to work, mostly along a secure bike path on the river… and still get off my bike to cross major roads!) But wow, i just see the road in a different way now - the experience has definitely made me a more patient and careful driver! smile

    • Humphrey B Bear says:

      08:23pm | 29/08/11

      Cycling and walking need decent roads, decent footpaths, decent cycleways, decent walkways and decent people. Cycling and walking are not just nutty recreations of greenies, left wing loonies,  and health nuts!

    • stephen says:

      09:00pm | 29/08/11

      Australians are a bunch of whinging sooky la la’s. 

      Oh not fair mummy; that ugly bike rider is getting to work faster than me, and he pulls all the chicks due to being buff from the exercise, and he always buys the office Friday drinks due to not having to pay carparking fees.

      Please ban him/her from all that fun and make them like me, a angry, souless, misery guts heading for an early heart attack?

    • FINK says:

      07:28am | 30/08/11

      This is the reason Cyclists are seen for the fools they are! stephen look to the left of you! bus, bang, yeah!

    • Marco says:

      09:30pm | 29/08/11

      Bicycle vs Car is such a polarising argument. I am thankful for the limited number of cyclelanes that are built!  I cycle half on road and half on cyclelanes to work (would do the whole way on cyclelanes if i could).  I work long hours and after a bad day in the office I am sometimes stressed and in a cranky mood.  I jump on my bike and pedal home for 30 mins, hopefully with a good sunset and hey presto I get home in an amazing mood, life is good and the world is beautiful!  maybe some of the bike haters out there should try it… they might relax

    • Geoff Russell says:

      09:32pm | 29/08/11

      One point I should have made in the article, but didn’t, is the number of Australian motorists who treat cyclists with respect and care. It’s clearly the overwhelming majority. During any week, I experience a couple of arseholes who clearly hate cyclists and are happy to risk my life by attempts at intimidation. I remember them far more readily than those who act properly. I also experience a few others who do the wrong thing but only through ignorance and inexperience. In Switzerland in a month, I ran into no arseholes trying to intimidate me ... the hoon I mentioned was driving stupidly but didn’t endanger me. So the situation isn’t really hopeless. Morons on the road here are a minority, though
      probably over represented in the comments above ... oh well.

    • Bilby says:

      09:05am | 30/08/11

      Now that’s what I’m talking about wink Thanks. I’ve also found people to be generally considerate, although no arseholes is definitely the right number. I wonder why that is. It may be the higher rate of cycling, perhaps bikes were used historically more than horses at some point? It would be interesting, although almost impossible, to pin down the underlying reason.

    • Beep Beep says:

      11:23pm | 29/08/11

      Wow, listen to you anti cycling people. No wonder Australia is the fattest nation on earth. I bet most of you who are anti cyclists have a few kg’s you need to lose…and perhaps a few brain cells you need to gain.

    • Two-wheeled supersized metal arsehole says:

      06:29am | 30/08/11

      Extraordinary anger going on in some of these responses. I have a shiny 4wd so i guess im a supersized metal arsehole… but then again I am also a cyclist. Living in Perth, we have some great cycling paths, but good luck on the roads. I have been clipped by cars, trucks and had bottles thrown at me on more than one occasion. Not to mention that there are local bogans who think its entertaining to throw bottles from the freeway across to land on the bike paths… the road gutters are full of glass, so punctures are a frequent occurence, especially when cycling before daylight. I would cycle more if i felt safer, but i dont. My wife has stopped cycling altogether because she is so scared of drivers after a family wagon nearly went over the top of her and she came off too many times after cars got too close to her… and didnt need to. I just find the argument so frustrating. Road cyclists have to ride on the road. Its simple. Motorists respect that, cyclists respect the road rules. But these days its scary enough to drive on Perth roads. This city is full of psychopaths! I was walking on the footpath in the city tonight and a woman hit the curb and nearly mounted it… if she did, i was a gonna! That is now 3 near misses in 4 days.

    • Jamie says:

      07:59am | 30/08/11

      Most problems that motorists have with cyclists is that the cyclists are inconsiderate arseholes.
      Racing on streets (if you were in a car then you would be a hoon).
      Riding 3 or 4 wide along a narrow road obstructing traffic flow.
      Racing along the road - slipstreaming the guy in front then swerving out from behind another cyclist without even looking for traffic overtaking you,
      Riding on roads when a perfectly good cycle path is running parralel to the road…..
      And they wonder why motorists have no respect or consideration for the cyclist.? We can at least hope that the Darwin princple kicks in early enough to stop them pro-creating.

    • Mother of two says:

      10:14am | 30/08/11

      I am a female cyclist and have nowhere near as many near misses, abuse as my husband does. My husband and his friends have been abused, threatened, had near misses on a regular basis.  Could it be that drivers are more patient with a female rider?  On another note, my brother-in-law was riding with a bunch one early morning, quiet country road, an idiot came up behind them, beeped at them, swore, accelerated and drove past them dangerously close, giving them a rude gesture on the way.  Turns out my brother-in-law recognised the driver was a guy he worked with.  Amazing how contrite and understanding the driver was when he realised that he was no longer anonymous and had endangered and offended someone that he very much admired and liked.

    • Sick of It! says:

      10:22am | 30/08/11

      Excellent post Geoff!

      We should petrol up to $3-5/litre, with he money subsidizing those who actually need their cars (farmers , tradesmen etc) and putting the rest towards an environmental fund. In addition, a decent tax (say, around $500-800 year) on stupid gas-guzzling cars (SUVs and Commodores/Falcons and other wastefully large cars, even European ones) so many Australians seem to drive. Do you really need all that space? When will you REALLY need all the power a V8 dishes out? Sorry, but the environment everyone lives in has priority over your selfish desires. Lots of families abroad and an increasing amount here seem to do OK with smaller cars. Why can’t you?

      Unfortunately, as long as petrol costs less than $3-5/litre, people will continue to drive their wasteful, gas guzzling cars, until it is impossible for them to do so, either financially because of high prices or due to oil just running out. Humans are disgusting, selfish creatures. They will continue to consume and consume until one way or another they cannot keep doing so. And that day is just around the corner.

    • Sick of It! says:

      10:32am | 30/08/11

      Sorry about that spelling, the first sentence should say:

      “We should the price of petrol up to $3-5/litre, with the money subsidizing those who actually need their cars (farmers , tradesmen etc) and putting the rest towards an environmental fund”

    • Swiss Girl says:

      03:20pm | 30/08/11

      Well, dear Aussies: this from a Swiss girl: You have a way of talking! Maybe because you are living in a big country you consider the stronger to have more right.
      Since we Swiss live in a small country we have to share - and so we share the roads and lanes. So the least protected come first: the Pedestrians, second the cyclists, and so on. This is the case even in Car-obsessed Germany. No need to overregulate this. The article states it correctly: since most drivers are also cyclists it is not a question of “them vs us” on the road. Today you’re the driver, tommorrow you’re the cyclist.

      It is also a public shared opinion that cars should be out of city centres anyway. The city centres are there to live in and for the cafés, the shops, the pedestrians. So if one wants to drive into a city centre he or she may wait and pay an impressive amount for parking. We have such a highly developped public transport that this laziness of driving every metre should not be promoted but prevented. Mind you, Novartis - one of the leading pharmaceutical companies - does not give you a parking space at the company if you live within a range fo 20km.

      But I am quite confident in you: You Aussies have quite an ability to enjoy life and to have a good time. You know how to work and you know how to relax. So once you enjoy the benefits of cosy and liveable city centres you will go for it big time. Why is it most appealing to have a Glass of wine next to the Opera and Harbour Bridge in Sydney? Because neither the noise nor pullution destroys the lovely atmosphere.

      So, you Aussies: come over to our Old World for a few weeks (not Japanese style) and try it yourself: you’ll love it and go home with that experience like the author of that article. Don’t be scared… grin

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski I feel your pain #workingtheweekend

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski You sounded testy at 11. I can only imagine...

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter