Sentenced to 90 lashes and a year in prison.

That’s was the verdict Marzieh Vafamehr received. Her crime? Acting in a film about an actress whose work is banned by Iranian authorities. No prizes for spotting the irony there.

Public whippings should outrage and anger us. Yet compared to a year in jail, these 90 lashings will most likely be the humane aspect of the sentence.

We don’t know exactly how many political prisoners there are in Iran but we do know the numbers significantly increased after the disputed 2009 elections where Ahmadinejad was named President.

According to a report by Human Rights Watch, last year many individuals, mostly young people, who had taken part in non-violent protests were held in solitary confinement and refused contact with their families and lawyers.

When their families tried visiting them they were met by the batons of riot police. Mothers and fathers of legitimate political activists had the photos of their children ripped out of their hands and were threatened with arrest.

The most terrifying reports of conditions have come from smuggled letters of activists that remain inside prisons. Earlier this year Mehdi Mahmoudian, a member of a reformist party currently in jail, wrote such a letter. He reported that government officials were handing out condoms to criminals and encouraging them to systematically sexually assault young freedom activists. 

In his own words: “In [Rajaeeshahr] prison, those who have pretty faces and are unable to defend themselves or cannot afford to bribe others are forcibly taken to different cells each night [to be raped].”

There is no judicial oversight – no real independent means of review, appeal or hope for these activists. In one case Ebrahim Sharifi, a 24 year old activist who had endured mock executions, beatings and rape in prison lodged a judicial complaint.

His case judge said: “Maybe you took money [to say this]… [and] if you go through with this, you will surely pay for it in Hell.”

As such his complaint was dismissed as being fabricated and politically motivated.

Those who attempt to speak out about their fate face the same treatment. In Iran prominent human rights lawyers are routinely arrested and the state has one of the highest rates of detained journalists in the world.

That’s the thing with Iran. It’s not the lashings that we should be most outraged about.

It’s the everyday incidents of cruelty, the common place human rights violations, the systematic way that the government aims to extinguish hope and recourse that should truly terrify and outrage us.

We need to make sure that we turn that outrage into action. And that we don’t get overwhelmed by the weight of the injustice and the depth of the problem.  There is hope and I know that as you read that might be hard to believe but it’s true.

Despite these injustices, activists continue to build momentum and maintain hope.

The most powerful ways external supporters make a difference in Iran is by mobilising through facebook and twitter. It may seem laughable, but it’s one of the few things that has actually worked in creating change in Iran by activists outside the country.

Last year at the Sydney Writer’s Festival Reza Aslan, a prominent Iranian thinker and writer, compared the protests in Iran that followed the stolen presidential election to what had happened in Tiananmen Square.

He argued that if YouTube hadn’t existed, Iranian activists would have had no way of releasing the footage of Neda being gunned down by Iranian police to the international community.

Without the mass outrage this act created there would have been nothing stopping the Iranian authorities from expelling all foreign journalists and simply gunning down their own citizens.

Iran no longer relies on media alone. It’s own citizens can ensure the world can bear witness.

Those who argue that online activism is simply ‘slacktivism’ forget that when it comes to dictatorial regimes like Iran, silence and fear is their greatest ally. The more we expose human rights abuses, the harder it is for the Iranian government to continue routinely violating human rights.

The Iranian government wants the world and its people to feel defeated. But voices heard through twitter and status updates in solidarity with Iranians who take to the streets can cripple the regime.

So why don’t you sign this petition and let the Iranian government know that you won’t look away, that you won’t forget and most of all you won’t let them get away with it.

68 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • TChong says:

      06:12am | 14/10/11

      Good to see all aspects of Ruperts empire, even the far flung antipodean Punch is been brought into the Neocons and Chicken Hawks latest push for a war with Iran.
      It wont be long before there is talk of WMDs.

    • Erick says:

      07:10am | 14/10/11

      Just goes to show there’s no dicatorship so nasty that the America-haters won’t support it.

      And yes, Iran is building nuclear weapons. For peaceful purposes, of course.

    • jf says:

      07:21am | 14/10/11

      No worries if they Iranians kill their citizens. Far better that the democratic, wealthy western nations don’t waste our hard earned on helping them out; they’re just black fellas hey TChong.

    • stephen says:

      07:37am | 14/10/11

      Well I don’t see too many aussies on boats trying to get their way into Iranian detention camps TChong.
      And perhaps the cause of all our problems is not Israel, (poor old Mel, who’s gonna make a movie about a Mr. Mackabee - which should really wipe the slate clean) but countries of the Middle East who refuse to step into a modern world.

    • TChong says:

      07:40am | 14/10/11

      now, now Eck, I dont attribute motives about you, in your varios posts.
      Back to the issue(s)
      The actresses plight is deplorable, but so is the use of caning by Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Thailand , and many other places where police can and do literally whip people into compliance.  Any calls to war for them. ?
      The alledged plot to assasinate ambassadors , - just in time for a US election- “passing strange “- as J Howard might say.
      Eck, ,you seem to be an astute observer of politics, but you dont see any connection, any concerted push by the US and its own internal politics, and the renewed interest in whipping up the fear about the Iranian bogey man?

    • Erick says:

      07:57am | 14/10/11

      Nothing new here, TChong. Iran has been effectively at war with the United States since 1980, and has been known to be building nuclear weapons since at least 2000.

      This has nothing to do with internal politics in the US, and everything to do with a despotic Islamic regime devoted to religious aggression.

    • Tator says:

      08:11am | 14/10/11

      JF,
      actually you will find Iranians are generally classified as ethnic caucasion as Iran is in the Caucasus region.

    • Brasil says:

      08:15am | 14/10/11

      You’re absolutely right, no Murdoch outlet should publish anything negative about Iran, no matter that there is a clear local connection and interest. Any other conspiracy theories you’d like to let us in on?

    • TChong says:

      08:29am | 14/10/11

      my point as well Eck
      As you say, an undeclared covert “war"has been in place for a long while, with the US more than willing to be involved in assinations etc, same as the Iranians.
      Why the sudden beat up in the US ?
      Mr Prezeedents of both sides of congress ( with the possible exception of Carter)  love their wars.
      Tail wags the dog. Again.
      Patriotism and scoundrels- a link that has been observed more than once thru history.

    • jf says:

      08:38am | 14/10/11

      Tator says:09:11am | 14/10/11

      “actually you will find Iranians are generally classified as ethnic caucasion as Iran is in the Caucasus region. “

      Thanks for the anthropology lesson Tator. Now to work on my irony for I fear that it is too subtle.

    • andye says:

      09:12am | 14/10/11

      The biggest threat to the regime in Iran is not the west. The west has been a useful tool -  a bugbear to unite a people against after the revolution. As the protests recently have shown, this isn’t working any more. The president has been fousing on Israel recently, but most Iranians don’t have any issues with Israel, and in fact I heard a lot more sympathy for the Israelis in Iran than I do here.

      The biggest threat to the regime is the Iranian people. The vast majority desperately want to be free.

      Also, an invasion of Iran is whole different ball game. Iran has a larger population than Iraq and Afghanistan combined. They most likely still have a bunch of operational F-14A jets the americans sold them before 1979 plus more recent russian jets. Tehran is massive (maybe double the population of Baghdad) and often covered in snow in the winter. The massive mountains ringing it to the north act as a natural defence.

      The biggest thing for me was something I was told once. It was basically: “We hate the regime and want it gone, but we love Iran more. If the americans invaded we all become ‘terrorists’.”

      This was from someone who is basically not Muslim at all. And bear in mind that these people know war. They know what it is like to have Iraqi fighters bombing your city and (in this girls case) have scud missiles land a couple of blocks from home.

      Also @erick - regarding nukes? Iran has very good reason for nuclear power apart from weapons. Tehran chokes on pollution. At some times of the year they close schools and only allow odd or even number plated cars (they alternate days) to drive. At the worst point when I was there the first time I was physically sick from the smog. They actually do need clean energy.

      As for weapons? This is a defensive move. Remember the “axis of evil” speech? That was a threat. They want a “get out of being invaded free” card. And they KNOW what it is like to be invaded and face down the barrel. They also want to be a regional superpower so they certainly wont be giving any to the arabs. They want to lord it over the arabs. As for Israel? It doesnt matter what the president says. He doesnt have that power. The mullahs do. The “president” is effectively the “mayor” of Iran. His power is mostly internal and only extends as far as the mullahs allow.

    • Tezza says:

      09:14am | 14/10/11

      TChong, I find your comments amazing. There was nothing in the article by Sara Haghdoosti to indicate that she advocates a war with Iran. What she does advocate is bearing witness, using twitter and social media, signing petitions etc. to expose human rights abuses and to let the Iranian government know that they can’t get away with it. Personally I don’t think these tactics will succeed against such a ruthless regime, but I can’t criticise Sara Haghdoosti for that. And TChong, your equating the use of caning by Iran with its use in Malaysia , Saudi Arabia is wrong. The Malays use caning in a symbolic manner; I don’t approve of that (of course)  but I wouldn’t equate it with the 90 stroke thrashing that Marzieh Vafamehr seems to be up for.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:56am | 14/10/11

      Andye is effectively right, the Mullahs do control basically everything and Ahmadinejad is a stool pigeon, he keeps on getting rebuked by the supreme leader.

      Although he is heavily conservative and that can be shown in some of the things he has implemented,

    • Markus says:

      10:06am | 14/10/11

      “The biggest threat to the regime is the Iranian people.”
      Spot on, andye. The same can be said about every single regime in the Middle East.

      It was very interesting reading some of the transcripts of interviews with Osama Bin Laden during the 90s (if I find the link again I will post it). Through all his examples of how the West and the US were corrupting and destroying his beloved Saudi Arabia, I was genuinely struggling to comprehend how he or anyone else in nations with similar issues could direct the blame at anyone other than their own country’s leaders.

      Hopefully more Islamic extremists are able to come to such a realisation, sooner rather than later. It would be in everyone’s best interests.

    • TChong says:

      10:55am | 14/10/11

      Tezza
      Unless you are totally unobservant, (and I dont wish to infer you are)
      then you must concede that the war drums, are again being thumped, by the usual ensemble.
      An alledged assasination attempt been revealed right during the circus of the US election campaign ?.
      Geez those Iranians must be dumb, hey?
      Come on, ,this is almost Captain America cartoonish.!
      AS for the symbolic value , or otherwise, of police whippings, that Tezza, I’m sure you would agree, ,may be best left to the judgement of the reciprient.

    • Alicia says:

      12:10pm | 14/10/11

      Maybe you guys need to get your eyes checked or learn how to read. The article wasn’t about going to war with Iran, it was about the lack of respect the country has for even the most basic human rights. Yes they are not the only country that canes or flogs its so called criminals but that wasn’t the point either. The point was how they treat their prisoners once behind bars and the more people that are aware of these kind of atrocities not just in Iran but everywhere they take place the more that can be done about it.

    • Markus says:

      12:30pm | 14/10/11

      @Alicia, we are already fully aware of the gross human rights violations in Iran.
      Exactly what are you suggesting can be done about it, if war is not an option in your mind? Staging an ‘Iran Walk’?

    • Markus says:

      02:53pm | 14/10/11

      Cracked atricles fall into one of two categories:
      - Funny, witty, well written lists of issues relating to a particular topic
      - Smug, self-congratulatory arguments against a bunch of made-up strawman statements.

      Take a guess as to which category that link falls into.

    • Daniel says:

      06:19pm | 14/10/11

      I’m with TChong! Let Iran do what it wants to it people, why should it concern us? If Iranians don’t like it that can fight for what they do like otherwise they can eat a sack of concreate.


      I’ll let you decide how serious I’m being.

    • Tina says:

      06:20am | 14/10/11

      I am usually not one for interference. I dont like that some countries say “this is how it should be” and try to force it upon other nations. Especially when the US or Europe are best examples that their way doesnt seem to be that perfect either.
      So I think we should be careful in trying to protect people and their basic human rights (which we must) and stop these kinds of mistreatments, but trying to allow people and nations their identity, their traditions, their way of life.

      Like we discussed yesterday, how we dont understand the way of arranged marriages in Indian culture, as long as it is no forced marriage, we should accept that other people are different - and should be. Languages, traditions and lifestyles should be kept alive. If we lose mulitculturalism, we lose the chance to learn from each other and be tolerant?

    • jf says:

      07:24am | 14/10/11

      Yeah, those stonings and public lashings are just so quaint hey Tina.

      The subjucation of women and poofs such a breath of fresh air to our western tolerance and acceptance.

      Viva la difference hey Tina.

    • powermax says:

      07:48am | 14/10/11

      Agreed. I’m all for a bit of a whipping. Culturally not a lot different to Catholic Boy’s schools of the 1950’s. Memories from the corners of my mind…..

    • Tina says:

      07:57am | 14/10/11

      Do you intentionally misread what I write? I said we have to interfere to protect human rights. But we should try and protect/respect their culture at the same time

    • Markus says:

      10:25am | 14/10/11

      Globalisation, by its very definition, will be the death of multiculturalism. The end result will inevitably be one giant mish-mashed homogenised culture.

      “I said we have to interfere to protect human rights. But we should try and protect/respect their culture at the same time”
      The problem is that those two points completely contradict each other.
      You either respect a nation’s sovereignty, or you don’t. You can’t have it both ways.

    • Fiddler says:

      06:45am | 14/10/11

      Yep, that’ll help. I’m sure the Iranian government will listen to an online protest, because they care so much already what their own citizens and the international community think.
      Did you ever consider that maybe they just don’t care what anyone else thinks about them? What are we going to do, sanctions haven’t worked, the UN hasn’t worked. Are you advocating invasion? That is the only thing that will work, but it would present the problems encountered in Iraq times about ten. Why do we always assume we have the power to fix everything in the world?

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:08am | 14/10/11

      Its the ‘Im American,  im the ruler of the world mentality’, although the majority of the problems of the Middle East can be attributed to them meddling in every countrys affairs, just gives the religious nuts something to cling to. If im not mistaken didnt the CIA overthrow the Shah of Iran in the 50s? then Britain imposed sanctions to hold onto their oil company?

      Apprently America can put sanctions on Irans Fed Bank? something I’ve heard on Fox news, so who knows.

    • gavin says:

      10:50am | 14/10/11

      hey simon, the CIA overthrew the democratically elected leader of Iran in the 50’s, not the Shah. The Shah was the brutal dictator that took over after that and was fully supported by the US.

      The Shah was so brutal to his own people that they eventually had enough and the Islamic revolution took place.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      11:19am | 14/10/11

      Was just off the top of my head, knew they overthru someone.

      Either way, America only has themselves to blame for Iran

    • AdamC says:

      12:03pm | 14/10/11

      Yikes, can everyone please stop idealising that idiotic Mosaddegh character? It was fifty years ago, for crying out loud, and it isn’t like anyone asked him to be such a silly twit that the UK and USA had to conspire to get rid of him. And how can one conclude that the Iranian revolution wouldn’t have happened were Mossadegh able to stay in power? It seems like a pretty silly counterfactual to me.

    • fml says:

      02:48pm | 15/10/11

      AdamC, you obviously have no clue what you are talking about,  you support the overthrow of a democratically leader? all for the profits of oil?,  i know we dont agree often, but that statement is just naive and ignorant.

    • Erick says:

      07:09am | 14/10/11

      A whole story about the cruelty of Iran’s theocratic regime - yet not once is the word “Islam” mentioned. How about that?

    • Nathan says:

      07:31am | 14/10/11

      maybe because it is not necessary to run your mouth about it all the time. Regimes can be horrible without a religous cause you know

    • centurion48 says:

      07:41am | 14/10/11

      @Erick: Perhaps because it is not relevant to the discussion? Or are you implying that only Islamic regimes can be cruel?

    • jf says:

      07:47am | 14/10/11

      Nathan/centurion

      So you don’t believe that the Sharia Law in Iran has any connection with the regime’s despotism?

    • Erick says:

      07:54am | 14/10/11

      The Iranian regime is a theocracy - that is, a religious government. Church and State are one and the same. It is run by Islamic religious leaders, and enforces Islamic law in the name of Islam. Islam is central to its entire reason for existence.

      Failing to mention Islam in the context of the Iranian government is like discussing the Soviet Union and leaving out Communism, or talking about Germany in WWII without mentioning Nazism. It’s just ridiculous.

      Nope, there is an agenda at work here, and it’s pretty obvious.

    • andye says:

      08:49am | 14/10/11

      @Erick - Luckily you are agenda free… right?

    • centurion48 says:

      09:12am | 14/10/11

      @jf & Erick: My point is that Iran’s leaders are despots but not simply because they are muslims. Islam does not condone the treatment of prisoners as described by the author. I suggest there are plenty of muslims, including religious leaders, that are just as horrified as we are at the treatment. The term “Sharia law” is bandied around as if it is a codified system common across all muslim communities whereas it varies enormously. Iran’s leaders are autocratic as much as theocratic.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      09:18am | 14/10/11

      But at the same time also Christians live there and It has the largest Jewish population outside of Israel.

      Iran is a strange place indeed, apprently from people that have travelled there the every day people are very nice and welcoming.

    • Johnny atheos says:

      11:02am | 14/10/11

      Erick, very true the authority for these oppressive laws is Islamic, but many are afraid to mention it. Fear of being branded an Islamophobic (A word invented by Islamists PR men to milk the guilt complexes inherit in some elements of Western society.) shuts down any debate or criticisms of this religion.

      What is even worse is that the apologist’s position gives no support to universal human rights for Iranians, Iranian secularist and progressives who want to rid their country of this religions influence.

    • fml says:

      11:20am | 14/10/11

      Erick,

      Do we mention Christianity when the US uses torture, invades a sovereign nation with out international support??

      Islam is only an issue because you wish to deride, Iran was just the same under the Shah. The iranians have a saying. “One dictator for another”.

    • john says:

      11:56am | 14/10/11

      Erick
      The 2 trick pony kiwi fruit.
      Misogyny and Islam bashing

    • AdamC says:

      12:06pm | 14/10/11

      I agree, Erick. Another case of: “What elephant? There isn’t any elephant in this room ...”

      Who knows, what with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, we may have a Sunni version of Iran to look forward to as well.

    • Erick says:

      12:56pm | 14/10/11

      @fml - “Do we mention Christianity when the US uses torture, invades a sovereign nation with out international support??”

      Well, you and many others obviously do.

      However, those people are wrong because the US government is not a theocracy, the US Constitution explicitly separates Church and State, and the US does not act in the cause of its state religion, because it doesn’t have one.

    • James1 says:

      01:09pm | 14/10/11

      We already have that Adam.  Our good friend and US ally, Saudi Arabia.  Why doesn’t anyone seem to care about them, I wonder?

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      02:50pm | 14/10/11

      @Erick

      “the US Constitution explicitly separates Church and State, and the US does not act in the cause of its state religion, because it doesn’t have one.”

      It might not have one, but doesnt mean its reality, try seeing someone who doesnt believe in god become president, wont happen can guarantee you of that.

      @James1

      15 of 19 Hijackers Saudi, bomb Iraq, go figure.

    • Chris_D says:

      07:22am | 14/10/11

      Let them sort out there own issues.  Hand wringing about it in online forums does nothing, and don’t try to sell the “raising awareness” argument.  We are aware. We are already involved in enough of other people problems in far away lands that has done little to advance any cause.

    • John says:

      09:02am | 14/10/11

      Funny we talk about humans right, after we have flattened Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. We killed up 1 million via bombs, disease and hunger. Then lets look at how the US funded Iraq and Iran to kill each other in Iran, Iraq war. Then you have Libyan funded, trained NATO rebels, committing mass’s of human rights violations in Libya and the moral western media seems to have missed the stories! What a surprise!

      The west is morally rotten. If there is an almighty god up in the heavens! Then we are most likely going to get a belting when he comes down from heavens!

    • Deano says:

      09:15am | 14/10/11

      The Iotola of Rock’n Roller!

    • overit says:

      09:41am | 14/10/11

      I agree with your article, although a little simplistic.  Basically there is nothing we can do except maybe provide refugee status to those who wish to leave.  Iran is nothing but a dictatorship.  I am thoroughly sick of those saying we should never get involved in any other country’s problems (when it comes to human rights).  Excuse being - ‘cultural differences’.  What a crock.  Islam is the root cause people.  I hate these lefties saying we are at fault.  Speak for yourself.  These people need our help in any shape or form.  They are less islamicised that you realise, compared to other muslim countries.  I wish their people would stand up, once and for all, and protest with all their might.  The Iranian government needs to be overthrown.

    • Anna C says:

      10:16am | 14/10/11

      I agree with you overit. I think all we can do is hope that the “Arab Spring” sweeps through Iran as well as the rest of the Middle East. I would like nothing more than to see all these despotic/theocratic regimes being swept away and democracy and freedom take their place. My only concerns are that they will swap one type of despotic regime for another i.e. a radical Islamic one. Democracy and Islam don’t seem to go well together.

    • John says:

      10:25am | 14/10/11

      When you have revolution funded and supported by an outside entity, you have a puppet regime, when you have a people revolution without outside interference then it’s a illegitimate revolution. I’m not a fan of Islam, but it’s all they know in middleast. They have no alternatives on incentive to change. Breaking the banks of the Islamic regime in Iran will just lead to civil war. It’s same of what is happening in Libya today. Libya will most likely be in civil war for next 10 years if Gaddafi loss’s the war. Gaddafi’‘s standard of living in Libya can not be replicated as the new regime will just steal the wealth, which will insure a civil war.

    • jade (the other one) says:

      10:30am | 14/10/11

      overit - the Mullahs in Iran came to power through the support of the West, in contradiction of what the people wanted. That is why many on the left blame us - because we did it. We got the people into this mess, and so it is our responsibility to get them out.

    • gavin says:

      10:58am | 14/10/11

      hey anna C, so basically you want democracy to spread across the middle east & iran, provided that islamic groups don’t win?

      sorry to say this, but if that’s what ur advocating, then that’s not really democracy. democracy is about being chosen by the people, groups should not be barred from elections on the basis of their policies.

    • fml says:

      11:13am | 14/10/11

      Agreed Jade, It was the meddling by the west, especially the british and the US that had a part in the overthrow of not only Mossadegh but also the shah after the Iranian revolution. The overthrow of Mossedgh, the only democratically elected leader Iran has ever had was because Iran wanted to nationalise their petroluem industry. The anglo-iranian petroleum company, which is now known as British Petroleum did not want a bar of it.

      This isnt a conspiracy theory rather than observed history. I dislike it when people say “we are not at fault”,Yes, individually you had no part in it, so what, but the west was most definitely involved and has to shoulder some responsibility for meddling in the affairs of others.

    • Anna C says:

      12:02pm | 14/10/11

      Gavin, there’s the rub. I don’t think that you can have radical Islam and democracy coexisting peacefully side by side because of Sharia Law and their insistence that church and state are one. 

      My only hope is that the people of the Middle East break off the shackles of radical Islam and opt for a more moderate version that recognises the rights and freedoms of all people including women, other religions, minority groups etc.

    • Markus says:

      12:51pm | 14/10/11

      @Anna C, it would still be a democracy, just not a secular constitutional democracy, the type we have come to recognise in the West as ‘true’ democracy.

    • rajend naidu says:

      10:08am | 14/10/11

      I know more deserving candidates for the 90 lashes and one year jail sentenced passed on the Iranian actress in My Teheran for Sale : the ruling male mob in Iran.

    • John says:

      11:36am | 14/10/11

      The art of US and the western moral depravity. Overthrowing and Installing puppets for 30 pieces of silver. Where is the church these days? The only voice in society are the moral depraved. Western Politicians, Media Barron’s, International Bankers and their minion pet dogs who sometimes turn on their masters. Aka Communists, Marxists, Far-Left pit-bulls. Bark, Bark, but are basically defeat hearing other people’s opinions.

      Jesus gives a lesson to the west.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDTzcFgUiz4&feature=related

    • With Nails says:

      04:32pm | 14/10/11

      “Civilisation begins where theocracy ends.  There are no exceptions to this.” Christopher Hitchens

    • marley says:

      06:00pm | 14/10/11

      I’d have said the Byzantine Empire was pretty civilized, actually.

    • TruthTeller's Society says:

      08:45pm | 14/10/11

      Iran has the long history of abuse of its own citizens. Just look back on the brutal regime of Shah of Iran and his murdeous Savak secret service. Well trained by CIA and from 1959 by Mossad as well. What they did to their own people rivals only to Stalins NKVD. That was a reason why Islamist won the revolution in 1979. As the saying goes…Today’s revolutionaries are tomorow’s dictators…Today’s Iran just inherited “bad habits” instilled by CIA in regime before…as you know bad habits die hard and wheels of destiny are turning mysterious ways.

    • seniorcynic says:

      09:17pm | 14/10/11

      I’m glad one thing has been cleared up. I thought the 90 lashes were for acting in an Australian film which I thought was fair punishment. Now I know that it is for criticising the Iranian govt. Now that is downright unreasonable.

    • Billy B says:

      10:25pm | 14/10/11

      Daniel - Strike a light Daniel get a dictionary.  ‘Concrete’ is what it is not ‘concreate’!

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      12:05am | 15/10/11

      Hi Sara,

      Welcome back by the way!!  Yes, you are very right to say that there are so many things wrong with the regime in Iran!!  Will it change overnight, I presume not!!  It is not just this particular nation who happens to have a big record of Human Rights Violations, the other side of the world in a place called the USA, capital punishments go on just the same!! Especially, in a place called Houston, Texas!!

      I personally would like that to change first, since the USA is always preaching freedom of speech & religion!!  Capital punishment as we know it, should not exist at this day & age!!  Especially, it should be more so in a democratic society like the USA.

      Lets all work together for better & fair rights for every man, woman or a child!!  Whether they happen to live in the Middle East, USA or China!!  Also being overseas living in a very different land to our heritage!!  We should also begin by saying NO to Islam Phobia.  Best regards to your editors.

    • Donyell says:

      09:17am | 17/10/11

      Extremely hpleufl article, please write more.

    • subotic says:

      09:21am | 17/10/11

      Australia has some pretty deplorable laws, but you don’t see the Iranian’s kicking up a stink about our crappy laws. Why, because it’s not their place to do so!

      I don’t agree with how Iran, let alone a whole heap of countries out there, treats their women. But Australian’s have to learn to keep the hell out of other people’s business. It’s not our country. We are not “World Police”. Leave these people alone.

      Marzieh Vafamehr made a choice. Knowingly. She chose a course, and she has to accept the consequences, right our wrong in Australia’s eyes. Iran is an Islamic country, with Islamic laws. It’s their choice to live like that. No one forces them to do it. And they’re not asking us to agree or disagree with it. But we DO have to accept it.

      Australia, grow up, let them live how they want to live, and leave them alone.

      Where do we as people get off with trying to enforce our beliefs and views on other nations? We aren’t always right you know….

    • Natasha says:

      04:49pm | 09/03/12

      To Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett Great site and Great aclirteHowever, in your aclirte, I would have liked to see more analysis of the destructive power and influence of Israel lobby in Obama’s administration and foreign policy. I strongly believe that: In America,  Obama is in office,  but   Israel Lobby is in power.From the late 1980’s to the present, The Israel Lobby has been in the forefront of a campaign to promote a US military confrontation with Iran in collaboration with Israel.The Zionist military proposals gained tremendous momentum during the 8 years of the Bush Administration.The Israel Lobby mounted an unrelenting mass media propaganda campaign demonizing Iran, fabricating and disseminating falsified accounts of its nuclear programs, infiltrating and occupying key positions in the US Treasury Department, aggressively bludgeoning other governments, industries, banks and investors to boycott Iran.Zionist Treasury Department officials hope to strangle and weaken Iran’s economy in order to soften it up for a military strike.No other single or combined force in North America, or, for that matter, any place in the world (except Israel) has played as big a role in promoting an offensive war against Iran as the Zionist politicians and officials in the US government.They were aided and abetted by Jewish lobbies, Zionist propaganda centres, multi-billionaires and hundreds of Jewish community organizations.The most important foreign policy of US and Israel is to prevent Iran from becoming a super power in the Middle East. Their objective is to protect Israel at any cost and in doing so; they do not care if they destroy Iran.Their sole aim is to destabilise Iran’s government and replace it by a US puppet government that protect the US and Israel interests in the region, and not the interest of Iran or Iranian people.USA and Israel are aware that an attack on Iran will have “catastrophic consequences”; instead, The CIA and Mossad plan for Iran is an agenda to maintain division and instability.They intend to Damage Iran economically in order to turn more people against their government, which in turn would destabilise and divide Iran. In other words, bloodshed and chaos equals control.So far, American government Has lost nearly 5000 soldiers, spent over 900 billion dollars and killed and maimed over one million Iraqis.This is the price American government is prepared to pay in order to change a regime in Iraq and replace it by a puppet government to look after the interests of US and Israel in the region.To American government,  Iran is worth far more than Iraq Iranian people must be aware that Iran is next. They must not allow USA and Israel to turn their beautiful country into another hell like Iraq In the name of freedom and democracy.Iranian people must also be aware that another revolution will have catastrophic consequences for Iran and its people.If the USA and Israel manage to divide the Iranian people and to destabilise the Iranian government, this will trigger another revolution and bloodshed far greater than what we have witnessed in Iraq and Lebanon.There will be bombing, street fighting, etc, the like of which we have not seen before.There is also a good possibility that Iran will be divided, as did Soviet Union, into smaller countries, such as:  Kurdistan, lorestan, blouchestan, Azerbaijan etcThe only looser will be the Iranian people.The last thing Iran needs is another revolution and bloodshed, however, Iran does need reform which can only be achieved by civil and peaceful none violent demonstrations.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski I feel your pain #workingtheweekend

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski You sounded testy at 11. I can only imagine...

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter