When anyone passes away, it’s only natural to dwell on their good points. So it is with professional life – no matter how hopeless someone is, the farewell speech will ultimately focus on their love of small animals.
Unionist Ark Tribe, charged for failing to appear before a star chamber. Photo: Kelly Barnes

Take Brendan Darcy (Sad exit of the man who took on building industry yobbos, on yesterday’s Punch) who refers to Building industry Star Chamber head John Lloyd as a remarkable public servant – and he’s right.
Mr. Lloyd is remarkable. At a cost of a mere $475 000 per year to the taxpayer (a figure substantially higher than Mr. Darcy is prepared to admit and well to the north of the salaries of, say, the PM or Chief Justice) Mr. Lloyd stands out from his colleagues. Why - because he plays a partisan role at the top of an ideologically driven organisation engaged in a political fight.

The Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) was established by the Howard Government for the purpose of de-unionising the Australian construction industry.  It didn’t work.
The ABCC staggers on like Howard’s angry orphan child. Mr. Lloyd hasn’t been put out to pasture; he simply couldn’t be bothered putting in an application for the job at the normal expiration of his contract.
He will not be missed by Australian constructions workers- one in particular.
On June 15 Ark Tribe, a South Australian construction worker, will stand trial in Adelaide. His crime? Ark is accused of failing to attend a compulsory interrogation by the ABCC. The commission wanted to drag him over the coals about a meeting he attended on a safety issue.  So an ordinary worker faces the real prospect of six months jail for allegedly not fronting a meeting. That’s what the ABCC is about, intimidating and threatening ordinary workers – Mr. Lloyd is simply it’s jack booted front man.
The International Labour Organisation has condemned the Commission and its unprecedented coercive powers no fewer than seven times – yet we still have ordinary workers being dragged through the courts like common criminals.
That’s why construction workers will continue their campaign to close the doors of the commission permanently – the ask is simple, construction workers want to be treated just like every other working Australian, under the same laws.
Then there’s the politics. On Federal elections the ABCC has form. Last time around, it acted as a taxpayer funded arm of the Liberal Party. As we approach Election Day this year, you’d have to expect a repeat performance.
Darcy argues economics in defence of this hopelessly compromised organisation.  The rubbery numbers he uses are not new and not credible. They come from a press release masquerading as a piece of economic analysis funded by the ABCC.
Riveting as it is to observe economists at twenty paces – the 2007 Econtech report (used by Darcy) falls fatally at the first hurdle. In a report by the Centre for Full Employment and Equity at the University of Newcastle Professor William Mitchell could find absolute no evidence of any relationship between the establishment of the ABCC and consequent rises (or falls) in productivity.  No one could reproduce Econtech’s data – no one could test their conclusions.  The report lacked in academic rigor what it made up for in spin.
Finally, Darcy employs the same tactic as the fallen Government he served – seeking to paint union leaders as thugs. It should surprise no one that officials of our union take their jobs seriously. The reason is simple. In an industry where on average one worker dies every week at work the stakes are tragically high.
We make no apologies for representing the interests of our members. We will continue to do so.  This is not the playground. Workplace practices that maim people, management decisions that kill – the rip-offs, underpayment and exploitation of construction workers in this country- this is our daily fight.
We will still be here doing our job long after Mr. Lloyd and the ABCC have shuffled off for good.
So at the end of Mr. Lloyd’s impressive professional career, allow me to add my voice – all things considered, I’m sure the man is very kind to his cat.
- Dave Noonan is the National Secretary of The Construction and General Division of the CFMEU

14 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Toph says:

      10:16pm | 09/02/12

      Good article Dave, I heard you speak on Radio Adelaide and enjoyed your passion and ability to throw a straight punch thoroughly. I’d love it if you could put up a few web links to back up some of the statements you make. I’d be interested in reading more about the independent assessments of the ABCC and Econtech from the sources you mention.
      Another thing I’d like to hear from you is your personal opinion of the CFMEU’s stance on climate change. Having read some of the information provided on their website, I was surprised to learn that they believe all proceeds of a Carbon tax should go to compensate households and provide job security. I would have thought it best to put that money directly into climate change efforts and research, or possibly into training redundant workers in new green industries. What do you think?

    • Hemi says:

      01:58pm | 03/06/10

      Good piece Dave, the ABCC is a construction of Tony Abbott’s anti-union crusade.

      The point that many of the posters, and the ABCC, seem to miss is that the behaviour they squeal about is almost always a response to a dodgy company, often a contractor, who is endangering safety, earnings and/or entitlements across the board. The problem with the ABCC and the Royal Commission that preceded it, is that these activities are repeatedly overlooked and only the defensive response is addressed.

      In effect, the ABCC has become a protector of rorters who, in a price-sensitive industry, have the capacity to drive honest operators as well as employees to the wall.

      Good luck with countering that because you are not going to get any support from Kevin Rudd, Tony Abbott or their ABCC.

    • Dave says:

      10:52pm | 01/06/10

      – the rip-offs, underpayment and exploitation of construction workers in this country- this is our daily fight. ........ 

      ......Yep. Big job that one, stopping the exploitation of construction workers in Aus.  You must be working your fingers to the bone.

    • Jackson says:

      02:49pm | 01/06/10

      The ABCC is a necessary force to protect the wellbeing of all people against self interested thugs from the CFMEU and their like.
      Blackmail, intimidation and violence. These are the words I heard from people in the construction world about the CFMEU approach.

      Rudd could even do the union movment a huge favour by keeping the ABCC strong.

    • lee says:

      12:04pm | 01/06/10

      Dave, is the sky in your world blue? What do you actually do for your members? Do they enjoy the perks that you and your union boss buddies wallow in?

    • Mayday says:

      11:19am | 01/06/10

      He will not be missed by Australian constructions workers-perhaps not but I’m sure Industry bosses are becoming nervous again, thank goodness there is an election due.
      Mr. Noonan and his union of thugs paved the way and set the example of fear and intimidation for years on building sites all over the country and now the poor things are complaining.  Pathetic!
      When will the union movement grow up and realise that its the employers who take the risk to start a business and employ people.  This union has used at least eight of its nine lives over the years, lets hope this election kills this feral cat known as the CFMEU for good.

    • Bron says:

      10:59am | 01/06/10

      “That’s what the ABCC is about, intimidating and threatening ordinary workers”-delete ABCC, replace with CFMEU, ETU etc etc. I have worked on construction sites for years & it is the unions way or the highway-you have no choice as a worker.  I have seen “safety issues” exploited by unions as a way to bring recalcitrant companies & workers to heel. And yet, when government regulation does to unions what unions do to us workers, they scream about how unfair it is.

    • Andrew says:

      10:40am | 01/06/10

      Useless article, unworthy of comment. I do have a question though, what benefit do your members derive from your sponsorship of the Canberra Raiders? We know you get to watch games from the comfort of a corporate (say it ain’t so) box, but what do the rank and file get?

    • Henry Lawson says:

      09:19am | 01/06/10

      Crooks, thugs and stand over men - that what you lead Dave. Don’t sully the title ‘worker’ with the bludgers you represent. BLF is alive and well.

    • Ellis Wyatt says:

      08:41am | 01/06/10

      The ABCC would never have been necessary were it not for the pattern of serial industrial behaviour of unions such as the CFMEU.  Building sites should not be exempt from the rule of law and it is regrettable that the taxpayer has had to fund a special agency to ensure that this remains the case.  It is to the credit of the Rudd Government that the ABCC has so far been retained.

    • JB says:

      11:41am | 01/06/10

      Agree completely with your sentiment.

      However, the Rudd Government - Julia Gillard in particular - has tried to get rid of the ABCC.  It’s actually to the credit of the non-Government members of the Australian Senate that the Rudd Government hasn’t been able to replace it with it’s own watered-down version.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:43am | 01/06/10

      Dave , the CFMEU lost all union credability when the Tassie Branch were seen to become all hot and bothered when dancing and fawning around little Johnny Howard paid them a visit in 2003.
      It would be more accurate to view the “forresters” and miners more as small groups of private contractors who label themselves unionists, rather than people who belong to the larger union movement.
      It was the antics of the CFMEU which has largely given the union movement its undeserved bad reputartion.

    • Macca says:

      09:01am | 01/06/10

      T. Chong, I have a new found respect for you

    • BTS says:

      06:29am | 01/06/10

      Gee Dave (See ‘Sad exit of the man who took on building industry yobbos’).

      It’s fortunate Dave, that we don’t have you in charge of the ‘court of public opinion’.

      Anything to say about these Union yobbos who are interested in protecting people’s rights and preventing one person a day from dying? 

      Outrageous Union behaviour.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@paulwiggins @richardkendall that fountain pens yarn is a great social trend story

Paul Colgan

I like how a tip erodes so only you can use it MT “@paulwiggins: BBC News - Why are fountain pen sales rising? http://t.co/0hk2MRtf

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski I feel your pain #workingtheweekend

Daniel Piotrowski

@apiotrowski You sounded testy at 11. I can only imagine...

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

Protecting the Barrier Reef is the Fin end of the wedge

When you take on a job like being Environment Minister there’s some hits you can see coming. …

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

ICB: Is white bread the worst thing since sliced bread?

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit column. It’s a regular column that looks at skulduggery…

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

Sometimes, you’ve just got to stick it to the bloody ref

We are taught early in life that we should not question authority. We must listen to our parents, our…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter