When Demi Moore was quoted a few weeks ago in W magazine saying “I’d rather be called a puma than a cougar,” I was at first quite pleased. Somehow, puma seemed a nicer name (cougar, to me, sounds as cringeworthy as nails scratching on a blackboard) and I hoped it would catch on.

But after some digesting, it dawned on me that calling women who go out with younger men ‘pumas’ isn’t any more flattering. A puma is still a wild animal who feeds on innocent prey – which is where the term cougar comes from – and is just as offensive.

Demi Moore, shame on you for thinking a prettier word will make you feel better. Besides, it’s not going to catch on. Unfortunately, the cougar is here to stay.

Is there any way to shirk the term, or the insinuation that comes with it? That older women are hunting naïve young men who know no better than to walk directly into their well honeyed trap where they’ll be pounced upon and clawed apart?

Originating in Canada in 1999, from a website called cougardate.com the name has stuck like bad BO does to the inside of an old cab. No matter how much I’ve ignored it and have never used it in a sentence or written about it in a story, ‘cougar’ is now a part of our everyday vernacular. Great. Another derogatory term for women.

A quick once-over of the names women have to live with over our lifetime: we get called spinsters if old and unmarried as opposed to a bachelor. We’re sluts if we play the field, while men are revered heroes.

We’re maneaters if we play the field, jailbait if we go for older guys, bitches has somehow become a song lyric staple and now we have to live with being likened to a vicious animal if we dare go out with a man born a few years after us. Quelle horreur!

Spinster might have been around forever, but cougar? I’ve got issues with it. Partly because it is a new term, so could have been prevented, but mostly because the connotation simply isn’t true.

Older women do not prey on younger men. They do not go out hunting in packs for 20-year-olds in skinny jeans with messy hair and dirty t-shirts. Trust me. That is not an older woman’s ideal date.

It’s almost always the younger man going for the woman. Have you ever been in this situation? I have, and the thing is, they know you’re ten years older but they just don’t care.

There’s something about a mature woman that’s like a toasted marshmallow to a guy– not as glossy or firm as a meringue but much more irresistible.

And here’s the thing: there’s nothing wrong with it. Over the last couple of years, more of my friends seem to be hooking up with younger men. And so what? Men have been doing it for years. Who’s to say that it ain’t the female’s turn?

My theory is that young men have less baggage, and so are more willing to commit to a serious relationship (which unless you’ve been living on Mars, is quite attractive to a woman, doesn’t matter what her age).

Younger guys like the idea of falling for someone who can show them the ropes and maybe teach them a thing or two. It’s not like they get tricked into these situations – they are not standing idly by, the victim, while a woman holds a gun to their head and makes them take off their clothes.

Guys are active partners in these relationships – and yes, they can actually be relationships as well as just short flings. A few of my friends married their toyboys (how much more fun and exciting is that name?) and there’s nothing to say it won’t work.

So why the label cougar? Why make the whole thing sound so callous and calculated and severe and damning when really, it’s just about two people who dig each other?

There’s no need for name calling folks, it just creates more lines in the sand. And stupid TV sitcoms starring Courtney Cox.

Most commented

39 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:19am | 26/11/09

      Boo-hoo.

      At least women don’t get collectively blamed for all the evils of the world, as men do. And women’s issues dominate the media, while men’s issues are ignored or ridiculed.

    • acker says:

      06:38am | 26/11/09

      This kind of phenomea is probably just as much of a result of young men living at home sometimes into their 40’s nowadays.
      We are seeing a group of males who are looking for cradle to grave mothers. One maternal One sexual

    • T.Chong says:

      07:48am | 26/11/09

      Men who get on with younger women are just as often labbeled as sleazy or cradle snatchers, as well as being considered “heroes” or studs. No one forces younger women to shack up with older guys either.
      If older men justified their choice with the “less emotional baggage “line, than they would be accused of preying on naive and easily manipulated young women. Why isnt this the case with cougars?
      Do cougars chose younger men because they are more easily controlled?
      My POV is if both partners are willing ,no one is exploited,then go for it.
      What I find odd is the idea that if women do XY or Z , it is all wonderful, all liberating,all good.
      If a man does same ,than he is a looser,sleaze bag manipulator.-
      Folks :for every dirtbag man in the world, he has his female counterpart. For every good woman,she has a male counterpart.
      I have to agree with Eric on this.

    • Bob H says:

      07:47am | 26/11/09

      Here we go - a tv program claims to have discovered a social phenomena never seen before.  Excuse me but a stunning older women have always put my chin on the ground.  We are such suckers for rebranding.

    • Tim says:

      08:17am | 26/11/09

      “My theory is that young men have less baggage, and so are more willing to commit to a serious relationship.”

      Please tell me this is a joke right? What kind of fairy land do you live in.

      But i suppose if you told the truth that the younger men are just in it for sex, then your romantic view of cougars trying to find love wouldn’t look so good, would it?

    • AncientCougar says:

      08:26am | 26/11/09

      Couldn’t agree with Eric on anything.
      I’ve been married to a man 6 years my junior for 20 years and before that was with a man 8 years my junior for 13 years.Never bothered me,them or anyone else so what’s all the fuss about?

    • Gazza says:

      09:05am | 26/11/09

      If the couple is happy more power to them, they have only themselves to worry about and in this day and age happiness is important, there will always be nay sayers but when it comes down to it if they are of legal age the choice is theirs whether young girl older guy or young guy older woman

    • Toddzilla says:

      09:10am | 26/11/09

      I loves the older birds, me. Only significant relationships I’ve had have been with the old ducks, even married to one now (been together 9 years). Cougar, no matter what you think of the word, is infinitely better than the earlier version of the same thing - the old boiler, though I do use both… even directly to the bride. They love a bit of youthful lip.

    • AFR says:

      09:23am | 26/11/09

      Agree with Toddzilla. Meh - its only a word. Better than “old slapper”?

    • Bacon & Eggs says:

      10:11am | 26/11/09

      I guess if the packaging is all holding together nicely, and the younger guys bite, then hell, go for it! You only live once!

    • ChrisG says:

      10:14am | 26/11/09

      I don’t mean to be pedantic, but a ‘cougar ‘and a ‘puma’ are the same beast - I suppose we don’t really expect scientific accuracy from Demi and commentators. And of course, pumas/cougars don’t hunt in packs - they are solitary animals.

      I suppose the issue is that when insecure men develop myths around basic fears, as they have done for millenia, they rely on archetypal images to represent those fears. The use of the cougar/puma myth just reminds us how pathetically insecure some men are.

    • hoofman says:

      10:58am | 26/11/09

      As long as the cougar is not your mate’s mum, or stickier still, your girlfriend’s, everything is sweet.

    • Maree says:

      11:23am | 26/11/09

      ‘boo hoo’
      that’s a great argument eric. really addresses the unfair labels given to women as discussed in this article.
      I believe many could respond to every comment you’ve ever made with ‘boo hoo’ just as easily.

    • skinny jeans says:

      11:31am | 26/11/09

      “It’s not like they get tricked into these situations – they are not standing idly by, the victim, while a woman holds a gun to their head and makes them take off their clothes”

      No, but some of us would like to be.  Ladies/cougars, please take advantage of us.

    • Eric says:

      12:00pm | 26/11/09

      Maree: “I believe many could respond to every comment you’ve ever made with ‘boo hoo’ just as easily. “

      They do, Maree, they do.

      But I don’t cry about it. I just keep on telling the truth.

    • Michelle says:

      12:18pm | 26/11/09

      Not only is cougar insulting to older woman, but think about what it’s saying about the men involved in these relationships.  That they are pathetic victims.  Boy talk about objectifying.  In fact if I was a man (besides using a stopwatch to see if it’s true that I thought about sex every 10 seconds) I’d be pretty damn upset about being considered a victim simply for finding an older woman irresistible.  Women don’t like to be pigeon-holed, can’t imagine men like it any more.

    • Liam says:

      12:45pm | 26/11/09

      “Demi Moore, shame on you for thinking a prettier word will make you feel better”

      Shame on you for being thick enough to initially think that that was a better alternative.

    • Mr Hyde says:

      12:47pm | 26/11/09

      Maree: don’t feed the troll.

    • Mobile says:

      12:49pm | 26/11/09

      It’s a big aggressive pussy.  Why is this inaccurate?

    • Ricky says:

      01:21pm | 26/11/09

      What crap.Older women just as aggressively seek younger men as their male counterparts(i have seen this first hand).They just dont seem to want to take responsibility.Being called a cougar is no worse than being called a toyboy or sugardaddy.Or bitter.Which is how you sound Nedahl, when you have use something so petty to push your femenist agenda.

    • casey says:

      01:23pm | 26/11/09

      The term isn’t a blanket term for older women after younger men. It’s a term applied to older women who forget their age and still dress and behave as though they’re half their age. It’s filthy and unseemly. Mutton dressed as lamb. You’re fifty-two; act like it.

      I see this kind of behaviour and hope someone slaps sense into me if I become one when I grow older.

    • Nuts says:

      01:26pm | 26/11/09

      The Modern Man’s dictionary records as follows.
      Eric (n): a short, popular, and pejorative measure for a waste of bandwidth.
      “Jeez, mate, that was a real 5-Eric there!” - ie a particularly boring piece of time wasting, repetitive and predictably obtuse factoid. It is said that most Eric-meters in common use only run to Level 5 on the well-tempered BS scale - at which point most sober readers over 16 have switched off, fallen asleep, or walked away to make a cup of tea. Readings over 5 are occasionally reported, though rarely and only then from quite robust field-strength units, typically found in pub front bars in remote mining communities.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      01:30pm | 26/11/09

      If my memory serves me well, men used to be called “gigolos” for going out with older women: they were, I believe, considered to be “gold diggers” - out for a wealthy mature woman’s money.  There was also a very, very old word for men who were free and easy of virtue - “rake”.  I think it came from the 17th century and meant, for men, the same as “slut” for women.  @ Toddzilla:  LOL - loved your post it made me laugh, especially, “the old ducks” bit, that brought back memories.

    • Macca says:

      02:03pm | 26/11/09

      @Mobile, LOL

      @Eric, keep up the good fight mate, it would’ve been nice if The Punch had a few articles regarding Men’s health, it is Movember after all. Instead we are fed this crap.

      I’ve got an answer for you Nedahl, stop giving a sh*t about what everyone else says and thinks. If someone is happy in their relationship, who gives a rats arse.

      Ladies, grow a thicker skin, some of you are more of a downer than Eeyore

    • Oxford Scholar says:

      02:22pm | 26/11/09

      Just for fun.

      Gigolo (M) and Gigole (F) were once the same umm occupation: dance hall creatures, originally, for whose company one paid. Sometimes even for dancing! The operative point being, M or F, gigolo and gigole were both paid for their “attentions”. Of 1920s origin, according to the OED 2nd Ed.
      See also Sayers, D: Have His Carcase (1932)

      Slut, in origin so early as to be now obscure, was recorded by the early 15th C as a woman of slovenly or dirty habits, a slattern. Very soon (mid-15th C) extended to mean a loose woman.

      Rake was originally rake-hell, also recorded as early as mid-15th C, for a male thorough scoundrel, utterly immoral or dissolute, a vile debauchee. By the late 17C, shortened to “rake”, a man of loose habits & immoral character, but also an idle dissipated man of fashion. The term was very soon applied equally to women!

      So a rake, we may think, would be more likely to, ah, be either enjoying “attentions” given or received for the sake of it, and perhaps paying for them - more likely, then, to be the patron of a gigolo or gigole, than the other way around.

    • Glen says:

      02:25pm | 26/11/09

      Care!  They make their bed and they have to sleep in it.

    • haha says:

      03:30pm | 26/11/09

      Macca, you truly are a contradiction….
      Crying about there not being an article on men’s health, then saying ladies should grow a think skin all in the one post??? LOL
      Feeling threatened & insecure like Eric? Next you’ll be complaining that more men are in jail than women….

    • Eric says:

      03:40pm | 26/11/09

      Thank you, Macca! Remember the truth is out there - just google for “men’s rights” and you’ll soon find lots of stuff.

      As for the “mainstream media” avoid, unsubscribe, don’t listen! Like The Punch, they are completely biased to the feminist side and never look to alternatives.

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      03:54pm | 26/11/09

      And yet, here you are, Eric, bravely posting away, trying to do your bit to turn the ugly tide ~ bravo! If only there were more men with your vision and courage in cyberspace, we’d be “something” ~ not sure what but definitely “something”...

    • Cuppa says:

      04:02pm | 26/11/09

      So let me get this straight.‘Cougar’ is demeaning but ‘Toyboy’ is “fun & exciting” ?Right.What bitter, hypocritical feminist B*llshit.

    • Michael says:

      04:14pm | 26/11/09

      heh cougar is an insult? what a load of crap women should wear the title with pride, its a lot better then milf.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      04:26pm | 26/11/09

      @Oxford Scholar:  Many thanks for that.  I stand corrected.  Good Post.

    • Eric says:

      04:57pm | 26/11/09

      ... and right on cue, “haha” provides a perfect example of the misandry so prevalent today.

      Well done! You have proved my point yet again.

    • 6c Legs says:

      05:29pm | 26/11/09

      Interesting article. But me thinks that the more women argue against the term, Cougar,  that those who hadn’t even thought it derogatry will now happily jump on the term.
      Apprently single women over the age of 35 are expected - mainly from younger females - to stay home, dress like Nana’s of the past, and only have chocolate as a ‘vice’. GET OVER IT! We have as much right to Partee’ as “you” do.

      In my neck of the woods “single men of a certain age” who aren’t trying to relive their teens are rarer than hens teeth! So I may have to offer my services to any Social Scientists out there who may be researching the subject. . .

    • Rachel says:

      05:43pm | 26/11/09

      You better hope that Marshmellow simile doesn’t catch on

    • BB says:

      06:56pm | 26/11/09

      Your comment:

      Puma and cougar are just different names for the same animal - puma concolor. So to be pedantic a cougar is a puma

    • Dan says:

      07:15pm | 26/11/09

      I have no problem with the term toyboy (although you can’t marry one; toyboys are for sex, not emotional committment). I also don’t find the term cougar to be offensive; if anything it’s sexy. Is it aggressive? Yes, but that’s not always a bad thing.

    • marley says:

      08:07pm | 26/11/09

      As ChrisG says, pumas are cougars.  Just different names for the same animals.

      Interesting, though, why are women called cougars while their male counterparts are wolves? 

      Maybe this is a sign of female equality after all - everyone can be denigrated equally!!

    • Andrew says:

      12:49pm | 27/11/09

      Good on these ladies for knocking heels with younger guys.  As it has been mentioned, men have been doing since the dawn of time.  As long as it is consensual then it’s game on in my book!  In the process it might just teach some of the younger guys how to treat women.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@wheels002 @janecat60 Prefer your son's excellent turtle.

Malcolm Farr

“@JoeHockey_MP: Expect #insiders to be a doddle tomorrow." @latingle @dwabriz& I can't agree whether to call u genius or genius AND saint.

Daniel Piotrowski

@Rob_Stott ... But don't go to Awaba unless you're a local because they'll treat you like a subhuman

Malcolm Farr

Some people are so worried re sexuality of others hard not to think they might have probs with their own . http://t.co/c2Lvg3FJP0

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter