China’s ‘“little emperors”, the adored children born under the country’s one-child policy with a reputation of being pampered and spoiled, are entering parenthood and have been accused of raising a generation of brats.

No sense of brotherhood

Chinese media this week ran reports in which men and women born in one-child families after 1980, known as “first generation only child”, were accused of producing selfish children with personality problems.

“Now that they have entered their 30s, many of them have already married and most have chosen to have one child. These children are called “second generation only child”,” the People’s Daily reported.

“Second generation only child’ have inherited many problems that plagued their parents, such as being apathetic, selfish, or unable to cooperate with other people. When they grow up, they may cause much more serious social problems than ‘first generation only child’.”

Zhou Xiaozheng, a Renmin University sociology professor, said the first generation of children had not learned “a sense of brotherhood”.

“When it comes to the next generation, the situation becomes even worse as this second generation does not have any brothers, sisters, uncles, or aunts, resulting in more severe problems in their personality,” Zhou told the report.

In Beijing News, psychologist Fang Xigda said: “Some parents who grew up in one-child families do nothing but spoil their children with material comforts. As a result, the ‘second generation only child’ becomes self-centred, fragile and tends to be asocial.”

Examples of pampered second-generation children included six-year-old Zhu Xuan, whose parents and grandmother decided to move house so the young girl could attend one of Beijing’s best primary schools, and seven-month-old Mo Mo, whose baby carriage cost 4,000 yuan ($659) – more than the average monthly wage – and who drinks milk imported from Australia (a wise idea when you consider that melamine continues to be found in local dairy products).

However, child psychologist Sun Ruixue said many post-80s generation adults had a strict childhood and this could mean they have a different approach to parenting.

“This generation [post-80s] is ambitious and independent and since most of them have a higher educational background, they will allow their children to have more freedom,” she said in an earlier interview with China Daily.

Mother Chen Tangtang, 25, said she grew up with the pressure of “being better and smarter than her peers” and wanted her one-year-old daughter to have a more relaxed childhood.

“I just want her to learn what she is supposed to in line with her intelligence. I won’t push her too hard with advanced education,” she told the newspaper.

In a recent China Youth Daily survey of 10,613 people, of which 96 percent of respondents said they were born in the 80s, 58 percent said post-80s parents were responsible and caring.

About 40 percent believed it inappropriate to make generalizations about a generation’s parenting skills and 2.8 percent said they lacked confidence in the parenting skills of their peers. About 44 percent said they would not to spoil their child.

Under the one-child policy, many rural couples are allowed to have a second child if the first child is a girl and ethnic minority couples are permitted to have two or more children. Parents who both grew up in only-child families are allowed to have two children. The government said the policy has prevented about 400 million births.

In Beijing, ineligible couples that have another child must pay a fine of 240,000 yuan ($39,000). Rich couples often circumvent this by having their babies in Hong Kong, where the policy does not apply.

Earlier this month, Zhao Baige, deputy director of the National Population and Family Planning Commission of China said the policy would not be changed during the 12th Five Year Plan (2011-15). It has been speculated that it would be relaxed because of an aging population and a foreseeable shortage in labor.

33 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:26am | 04/03/10

      Got to love the chinese when they do something they do it right

      “China Youth Daily survey of 10,613 people”

      Makes our polls of 1,000 people seem grossly insufficient

    • Markus says:

      01:42pm | 04/03/10

      1000 out of 20 million people would surely be a lot more representative than 10,613 out of 1.2 billion?

    • Clarise says:

      03:02am | 05/03/10

      Agree with Marcus. Don’t forget they have the highest population in the World, even more so than India.

      Besides I don’t agree with your view that “When China do something they do it right”. I laughed so hard I nearly choked. China is socially backwards. I hardly call living in poverty, extreme animal cruelty, communism and almost slave labor as right. The reason a one-child per family policy was implemented in the first place was to help slow China’s rapid population (something their culture is responsible for anyway. Boys are more favorable so families had as many sons as possible).  The one-child per family policy has caused an over-population of girls in orphanages who are uneducated and are destined for a life working in factories, that’s if they survive childhood in the first place due to the lack of medical care.

    • Ruby Tuesday says:

      09:13am | 04/03/10

      Ok, good numbers for survey but they don’t get everything right - what do they expect when they enforce a one child policy.  Nothing right about that.  Moronic.

    • Gavin says:

      11:32am | 04/03/10

      What would you suggest then to put the brakes on a population that is or was out of control?
      Or should they just keep populating their country until they fall over the borders and into the ocean???

    • Ross says:

      09:03am | 05/03/10

      Agree with Ruby. China has ove 800 Million people living in poverty. Go there and try to find any wildlife (it normally all gets eaten). Try to find happy people that have a decent standard of living (outside the main cities).

      While the one child policy may create some problems the alternative is probably much worse.

    • Sahara says:

      09:26am | 04/03/10

      You don’t have to go to China to find a generation of “selfish brats” raised by helicopter patents

    • Realist says:

      01:45pm | 04/03/10

      Hey c’mon! Those rotor blades with double helio-synchro noiseless design would be great parents!!

      I was raised on the patent for internet bubblegum and the chocolate record player. 

      Have a heart!!

    • Rae says:

      09:39am | 04/03/10

      Yeah… but China has a population of more than 1.3 billion and Australia has just 21 million people.

    • Fergus says:

      09:43am | 04/03/10

      This is just so wrong.

      It’s all part of the dogma surrounding only children.

      I did a 5,000 word research project on this very topic, “little emperors” was in the title. And it was clear that there is actually no universal difference between only children and those with siblings.

      It all depends on the style of parenting, like any other children.

      I’m disappointed to see some sections of the media still subscribe to the ignorant “only child syndrome” idea. I urge you to get over it, all scientists and sociologists are.

    • Ant Sharwood says:

      10:11am | 04/03/10

      Hey Katherine, I travelled to Beijing in late 2006 to do a bit of pre-Olympics reporting for News Ltd’s sports mag Alpha, and employed the services of a female 20-something uni graduate as translator.

      I asked her about what it was like to be a member of the one-child generation, and she said she had shared a room with five other girls at uni, all of whom she now considered her “sisters”.

      I’ve got to say, she was one of the most well adjusted, delightful young women I’ve met in any country. And while, obviously, my sample of one may is not by definition representative, I don’t think it’s fair to brand a whole generation as brats.

      You want brats? I see em every weekend on the endless round of kids’ parties in Sydney. And let me assure you, many of the worst brats have siblings galore.

    • JL says:

      03:56pm | 06/03/10

      Totally agree with you, Ant. I have lived in China for 10 years, and can tell you they don’t even notice it. Parents are close with other relatives, and cousins treat eachther as brother and sister (in fact they call eachother that). This will continue in the next generation with second cousins. The People’s Daily is just a gov propaganda rag, and portrays them as brats to try and justify the crackdown on social attitudes that they are preparing (and low-IQ Western bleeding hearts fall for the propaganda) . These attitudes include individualism and demands for justice and human rights, which obviously the Party fears. As you say, the majority in the current generation, incuding those in the country, are extremely well-adjusted. Much moreso than our own youth with their selfish “me” attitudes, easy credit, and materialistic addictions. We should send dilinquents from Sydney are Melbourne over here for a reality check.

    • Elaine says:

      10:34am | 04/03/10

      I host international students in my home. I have had Chinese kids (male) who are demanding arrogant pigs & at present have a Chinese girl who is a delight to have in my home. All are the only children of their parents. I noticed the the parents of the males were in constant contact with their boys but the girl only gets a weekly call.

    • Anthony says:

      12:13pm | 04/03/10

      As someone of almost entirely Chinese descent, I assure you that both Chinese males and females can be “demanding, arrogant pigs” and soft-spoken, polite pictures of contrition, and that both can be doted on or ignored by their parents. While the stereotype there would make sense, not every Asian of a particular gender thinks the same (whether or not they look the same :p).

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      11:14am | 04/03/10

      A generation of “little emperors” or a generation of baby boomers- no difference really….

    • Keith says:

      12:09pm | 04/03/10

      Boys are more the problem than the girls due to their place in the Chinese structure.  The boys get everything when the folks die, the girls get nothing so it’s the boys who get pampered.

      The other problem China will have is that now there are alot of single blokes and not enough single girls going around which is a result of the 1 child policy (if your going to have one make sure, at all costs, it’s a boy mentality)

      China will be an interesting place in the next 20-30 years, we’ll either see alot of emigration or importing from Laos, Vietnam etc..

    • jw says:

      12:38am | 05/03/10

      what you described is an old china and rural china. City esp big city folks do not discriminate girls normally

    • JL says:

      04:14pm | 06/03/10

      Keith - JW is right. China has changed. The extra blokes can marry abroad, and there will be queues of girls wanting to gain nationality to the new global powerhouse. No problem for them. Meanwhile the girls DO inheret everything, so you are wrong there too. Do you think the parents’ assets are forfeited because a girl is unworthy? She’s a single child remember - she gets everything just as a single son would.

    • rohan says:

      10:01pm | 06/03/10

      @Keith,

      perhaps it is time to grow up and learn a bit more about the world. Why is it that there are so many of these old notions that are prevalent about every other Asian country

    • BobM says:

      02:15pm | 04/03/10

      Holy Sh*t!  That is one ugly baby!

    • Adam MacLeod says:

      03:44pm | 04/03/10

      Chinese one-child policy may suck if you’re chinese but it’s good for the rest of the world as it slows population growth.  Thank you China.

    • Kim says:

      04:37pm | 04/03/10

      That baby’s huge!

    • Rob says:

      05:00pm | 04/03/10

      China is no different from Australia. Parents have spoilt their children to the point where they have no respect for anyone, let alone the elderly. All they think about is themselves.

    • Drew(Darlinghurst) says:

      06:34pm | 04/03/10

      The 21st Century belongs to THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA

      Just deal with the facts .........Australia is a no nothing nation with little to no influence on world affairs.

      Im so Proud to be Chinese!!!!!!

    • andy says:

      10:09pm | 04/03/10

      Drew have you been reading to much US propaganda? The US military industrial complex wants you to think that you will rule the 21st century to justify vast military expenditure, because since the soviets the taliban just dont cut it ....they cannot even make their own guns. They want a big boogie man (china). Chinese GDP per head and population demographics mean that China will slow down economically mid century and have the population demographics of japan in 2000 with the economy of Japan in 1960. Dont fall into the trap the US is laying for you (economic isolation, one party state, low economic growth aka the soviet union) just be happy with how well China has done and will continue to do if it avoids the trap.

    • Patrick says:

      08:59am | 05/03/10

      andy what the hell? Low economic growth? China? Haven’t they been rising more than any other country for the last decade?

      “Chinese GDP per head and population demographics mean that China will slow down economically mid century and have the population demographics of japan in 2000 with the economy of Japan in 1960” 

      Where did this come from? Any reference?

    • JL says:

      04:08pm | 06/03/10

      Just a bit concerned about the racial content there Drew. You are confused between your “ethnic pride” (we call it racism) and your country, which I assume is Australia unless you are just here studying. Unlike China, Australia no longer has a White Australia policy, and we no longer think that way. The Yellow China Policy is clear however. Even if you are a student, you will qualify and be accepted by our people as Australian if you merely wish to stay on and apply. Your racism tells you that that is because we need your superior intelligence to grace our ethnic mix. Meanwhile no non-Han ethnic can ever gain citizenship in China, despite the number of foreginers working and increasingly even born there. Your Pride is self-humiliating. (Just thought I’d give you a heads-up) smile

    • Elizabeth says:

      05:38pm | 06/03/10

      Drew, if you are so proud to be Chinese why are you living here in Darlinghurst?

      You know; it’s not very polite to crap on your hosts.

      BTW - China would be up s%it creek without Australia’s coal and other natural resources.

      Give me Australia any day; it’s a gorgeous country, not overpopulated and a much better way of life.

    • rohan says:

      09:57pm | 06/03/10

      JL:

      you are quite funny…what about all the cries about not integration, sticks to themselves etc…you are offended?, why did you get beaten up recently because you are an immigrant…

      And Elizabeth, there are other sources of coal etc…but only one customer. and without mining, what exactly are you producing with natural talent? You should thank that you have the natural resouces, otherwise per capita GDP will be much less…

    • JL says:

      08:27am | 07/03/10

      Hey Rohan…you don’t need to prove yourself to me. True confidence should come from inside. Good luck with that.

    • Chris L says:

      11:25pm | 04/03/10

      I, for one, welcome our new chinese overlords.

    • Jenni says:

      01:54pm | 05/03/10

      LOL @ chris - nice simpsons misquote wink

      Oh, and I agree with all on here saying anybody can raise a brat, doesn’t matter whether you have 1 child or 10.

    • Chris says:

      03:40pm | 05/03/10

      After working as a teacher in Beijing for the last year I worry for these ‘future leaders’ of China. The boys in particular.
      With the one child policy they now have the situation of one child being raised by the father’s parents who would usually be living in the parent’s house as one big family. The kids have six adults dotting in them 24/7, plus the extended family pre one child laws.
      The grandparents see it as their role to give these kids everything they ask for or they feel like failures. I’ve seen nine year old’s who talk to their parents and grandparents like dirt, can’t dress themselves, are literally spoon fed their food, and amazingly, actually have their arses wiped for them (seriously, nine). Teenagers with the social coping skills of four year old’s.
      I also have Chinese friends in their late 20’s and early 30’s who still live at home, have no idea how to cook, clean, or wash, and are scared to move out.
      It’s not so much the one child policy that’s the problem.
      Its many other factors. Just a couple - China’s traditional family unit and way of raising it’s children, the newly rich with money to burn on their kids, and a culture which is set in it’s ways.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

RT @JenBrockie: A take on social media from India http://t.co/5XCerDTB @tehelkadotcom

Lucy Kippist

RT @alaindebotton: So many of our problems would be alleviated if we had 3 or 4 exceptional friends living within a 2 minute radius.

Paul Colgan

RT @latikambourke: Yes, @PeterSlipperMP is genuine.

Anthony Sharwood

It's terribly unfashionable to admit but my Cityrail train just left on time again

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Interest rate barney barely even rates as interesting

Interest rate barney barely even rates as interesting

Stop all the cheering, cut off the champagne. Prevent the pollies from barking and silence the drums.…

Life slips away while you’re filming it on your phone

Life slips away while you’re filming it on your phone

Some friends of mine had lunch on Saturday with a mate who spent so much time artfully composing photos…

Other stuff to be angry about today (with chorizo pic)

Other stuff to be angry about today (with chorizo pic)

That dopey Spaniard. Three-time Tour de France winner Alberto Contador has been banned for two years,…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

150 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter