If Macquarie Bank was capitalism’s “Millionaires Factory,’’ the Labor equivalent, at least in SA, is the powerful Shop Distributive and Allied Employees Association which turns out parliamentary careers.

It's amazing what you can find in the shoe bin

Indeed, click on the party’s SA website where it says “Constitution and Rules’’ and the first thing that comes up is an ad for the shoppies’ union.

The socially-conservative SDA has been extraordinary in the degree to which it has dominated the party, colouring its policies, determining its leadership and personnel, and funding its political campaigns.

This activism does not come from any groundswell of particularly political or class conscious retail workers.

Au contraire, it derives from the precise opposite. Ignorance. Indeed it is possible that some of the SDA’s disaggregated and docile members do not even know they are members. And few would have any detailed understanding of what their money helps fund.

For years, this ignorance has given union officials carte blanche to pursue their political careers and push a particularly 1950s version of social policy using unwitting members as their authority and applying their members’ dues to the pursuit of power in the ALP.

In fact, such is the union’s sway over the ALP that it has even sorted internal power struggles and personality differences by bumping the odd (and I do mean odd) union official ``upstairs,’’ meaning into parliament.

Many unions have behaved like this but the SDA does it best and it does it most which is why it has become so powerful.

Not that you would know that from its industrial muscle which seems to be rarely flexed in anger. When was the last retail strike, one Labor critic asked rhetorically? Funny that in an industry known for long hours, low wages, and poor job security.

Perhaps that is why the big employers in the retail sector play along providing a cosy closed shop arrangement which even extends to collecting dues.

But if the union’s record for members is modest, save for its dogmatic attachment to restrictive shopping hours which the Productivity Commission argues is a key factor strangling the industry, its power in the ALP is anything but.

And this power is used to allocate jobs, put obedient candidates in winnable seats, and steer the ALP away from any social reforms its Catholic dominated overwhelmingly male leadership finds offensive, such as the current push for gay marriage.*

This is particularly jarring: most retail workers are young and many would sympathise with much of the Greens’ platform. Yet their union leadership is the opposite. So much for representation.

When SA Premier Mike Rann was visited two weeks ago to be told his time was up, it was not his putative replacement who did him the courtesy but two men** from the SDA stable. One was Jack Snelling an SDA sponsored MP, foisted on the unenthusiastic premier as his new Treasurer earlier this year, and the other, Peter Malinauskas, the 30 year old wunderkind boss of the SA shoppies’ union.

And when Labor’s trio of ``faceless men’’ decided to call an end to Kevin Rudd’s prime ministership, the SDA’s former secretary-turned-senator, Don Farrell was among them.

So how does the SDA get this influence? In short, the answer is money.
Labor’s annual state Convention is where policy is made and MPs are chosen. This is where power and influence are apportioned.

Of the 200 delegates to last year’s SA Convention, (100 union delegates and 100 from local districts) by far the biggest single voting bloc was the SDA’s.

Among unions, the SDA leads the field ``affiliating’’ to the ALP for a very heroic 22,785 members - a euphemism for saying it has 22,785 union members who are willing ALP members. Not bad for a union boasting just 25,000 members all up in SA, NT and Broken Hill.

For this affiliation, the ALP charges somewhere in the ballpark of $5.00 per member (this is not disclosed) or around $113,000 per year in dues _ money taken straight from shop assistants and fast-food workers.

Critics of this longstanding arrangement say there is no requirement for SDA or other unions to demonstrate members’ authorisation for this massive transfer and no names are supplied.

This hefty wedge _ which dwarfs all the other union affiliation fees _ buys the union leadership 26 delegates which BTW, the leadership appoints (no election needed) and who dutifully vote as one giving the union dominance of the Right faction and by virtue of the Right’s majority, control of the party.

In truth, of course with the polls the way they are, the union would struggle to prove it had 22,000 enthusiastic ALP voters across the country let alone 22,000 members in SA happy to pay their dues to the ALP no questions asked.

It is time more people in the ALP stood up to this disgraceful and undemocratic practice. But don’t hold your breath.
Just this week, The Advertiser reported that the next cab off the rank to enter the SA cabinet, Chloe Fox, has recently signed up to the SDA. (Perhaps being an MP qualifies as ``allied employee’‘?)

Should we conclude this new allegiance is merely a coincidence? Unlikely.

*  Department store staff seem to have plenty of proudly gay people among them but their union believes they should not have marriage rights.

** Women dominate the retail sector but the union has always been dominated by men. Of the six state branches and the national office, none of the heads are women.

Most commented

33 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      06:34am | 13/08/11

      Is that the sort of way Joe Hockey got into politics?  I think he’s in the wrong job.  If he bought the Italian restaurant in our town, I’d eat there every day, drink his grog, and talk bullshit with him.  He’d probably make more money than he does in Canberra too!

    • Denny Crane says:

      08:43am | 13/08/11

      Hockey made more money before going to Canberra as did most Coalition politicians. Its only labor poiticians who could not make it in the real world who turn to canberra for more money. The gravy train is too tempting - big rewards and no responsibility. What a great existance. Its only the taxpayer who suffers for their incompetance.

    • nihonin says:

      09:11am | 13/08/11

      acotrel, look pigeon, nice try at deflection.  Keep rooting and spinning for your house of cards party.  But the public now know more than ever that Labor party candidates are just ex union bosses.

    • Against the Man says:

      12:43pm | 13/08/11

      ALP politicians are real world failures which makes their f@&k ups even more predictable and funny! smile

    • Super D says:

      07:24am | 13/08/11

      The ALP has always been about union leaders standing on the shoulders of workers while they grasp for power.  They won’t thank you for reminding their members.

    • Mayday says:

      07:34am | 13/08/11

      “It is time more people in the ALP stood up to this disgraceful and undemocratic practice.”

      Are the shop workers intimidated into joining the union? 

      Each one needs to stand up and say No, the union is not looking after their interest and who decided that a union should decide social policy, don’t we elect our members of parliament to do that?!

    • Chris L says:

      10:07am | 13/08/11

      Good point. I saw the futility of the Financial Services Union and cancelled my membership. Easy as that.

      If people aren’t motivated to know what’s going on, they will be conned and they will be misrepresented.

    • Bruce says:

      01:07pm | 13/08/11

      Chris L. The FSU has always been a ‘gummy tiger”. Particularly when it came to management negotiations

    • Lisa H. says:

      01:45pm | 13/08/11

      As a young 15-year-old checkout chick, my dues were taken from my pay automatically, I wasn’t given the choice or opportunity to say no.

    • Gregg says:

      07:38am | 13/08/11

      Err Mark, What’s up Doc!
      You trying to do a Nowhere to be found Lost somehow and returnee Nossy on us being all joyous about unionism.
      The Comrades will not take to it so well.

      As for describing the picture.
      We’re only missing Julia looking for some shoe leather to wear out.
      I think you might have passed Joes doctoral thesis membership grading but expect a please explain from Comrade Leader.

    • nossy says:

      08:46am | 13/08/11

      @Gregg   hhahah kisses greggy - mate you wasted your blog AGAIN - you never tell us anything we dont all know fella - more “meat on the bone” please Gregg!  hahahah

    • AdamC says:

      07:44am | 13/08/11

      Socially conservative and left wing at the same time? Eugh, worst of both worlds.

      And at least this article wasn’t just a compliant recitation of the latest gallery groupthink. Things are looking up for ‘our’ Mark. Having said that, I don’t see why he seems to think that union leaders do or, indeed, should necessarily reflect their membership base. One, they often don’t, two, wouldn’t that mean this union would be run by airhead young women and catty gay men?

    • Chris L says:

      10:09am | 13/08/11

      “I don’t see why he seems to think that union leaders do or, indeed, should necessarily reflect their membership base” -

      It’s almost as silly as expecting local MPs to represent their constituents. Very 20th Century thinking.

    • Minko says:

      08:43am | 13/08/11

      Sorry I LOLed so hard I probably woke the neighboues at this tripe.  Young people are all pro-gay and support The Greens, so the SDA being white Catholic males are acting like nasty Howard-era conservatives by pushing an anti-same-sex agenda.  I’m giving you 10/10 for efficiency.  In one short sentence you created a clear victim group, assumed generalised support, and then pitted the archetypal oppressor against them.  I’m taking that kind of play to the office.  I’m sure they voted for parental leave…why not draw the link as positive for their members because women are just housewives in waiting, looking to breed and deserve six months maternity leave before leaving the workforce to focus on more pregnancies?

      And for the Punchers not smart enough to recognize sarcasm a while away, my second statement is supposed to highlight the ridiculousness of the first statement, not vilify it.

    • Cate P says:

      09:55am | 13/08/11

      It is painfully obvious that Mark Kenny has no social contact with retail and associated industry workers - they are actually a quite conservative bunch (including the young ones), and the Shoppies reflects that.  And incidentally marriage as being between a man and a woman was not a conservative invention of the 1950s; it has a rather longer history and tradition than that.  Odd that the only union being criticised lately is the one that is vocally anti-gay marriage!  The CFMEU or the MUA for example actually deserve criticism and political neutering.

    • David of the Grand Academy of Adelagado. says:

      11:54am | 13/08/11

      Cate, you are probably right that the SDA reflects many widely accepted values. Trouble is, it ultimately puts clueless hacks into Parliament who don’t know right from wrong and have none of the visionary ideas we need from those who are steering the ship. The cream does not rise to the top. The fat maybe.

    • TomZ says:

      11:29am | 13/08/11

      Sadly the days of the SDA in its present form may be numbered as we all start
      buying from the internet.
      If the SDA were genuinely working towards the best interests of their constituency, they would actively encourage their constituents to upgrade service skills and facilitate transition of “shoppies” to retail areas that might survive the internet juggernaut.

    • Dan says:

      11:40am | 13/08/11

      Never forget that the Shoppies union is just a front for the DLP. Most of the poor sods who make up the rank and file have no idea they are supporting a nasty religious right political organisation that we all thought vanished without trace years ago. No it hasn’t. It lives on in the Shoppies and in sections of the South Australian Labor Party. Jay Wetherill might be from the Left of the party, but he is being installed as Premier of SA by the Shoppies and will be forever beholden to this group of nasties.

    • David of the Grand Academy of Adelagado. says:

      11:44am | 13/08/11

      You forgot to mention a star graduate of the SDA selection process, The Honorable Bernard Finnigan, whose only previous employment was as a Union Official for the ‘Shoppies’

    • Shane Coghlan says:

      01:43pm | 13/08/11

      Mark forgets that alot of the people joining the Labor Right faction don’t do so for ideological reasons, but do so for power and career prospects. I have some SDA members in my politics classes at Uni and they are very socially progressive. If they are willing to sell out on their principles before they get into parliament, what chance have they got of being good politicians?

    • Steve says:

      10:24am | 15/08/11

      None…

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      02:23pm | 13/08/11

      Union Members throughout Australia are not aware, for their union bosses conveniently “forget” to tell them that a percentage of their Union Membership Fees - it has been reported well in excess of 10% - goes directly to the Australian Labor Party (ALP)
      Prosepective members of Unions are deliberately never advised of this.
      Prospective members are never given the option to say No to this blatant, possibly dishonest, even corrupt, practice by the Union bosses.
      It is fair to say that at least 50% of all unions do not vote for the ALP.
      At the State level Isobel Redmond & her Liberal should adopt as policy the introduction of Legislation banning any part of Union Dues being directed to any political Party. This would still allow individual Union Members to donate to the ALP or any Party they wished to support. But the practice of a Union diverting Union Dues & handing them on to a political party must be outlawed.
      It did not take legislation to stop it but many years ago the Federated Clerks Union (FCU) was forced by it’s own members to stop diverting, at the time 7% of Member’s dues, as it had been doing without their knowledge or permission, to the Democratic Labor Party (DLP) - A campaign started in Melbourne,Vic by Airline Employees covered by the FCU & which spread to become Australia-wide - at least within the Airline Industry in Australia.
      The next Federal Coalition Government - whensoever that may be - should also introduce legislation to outlaw this diverting of Union member’s funds to political parties. As the Unions don’t ask permission from their members they are, in fact, stealing their member’s money to support a political party.

    • nossy says:

      02:24pm | 13/08/11

      Well Mark the “slows” are out for the very unpopular Carbon Tax. With so much financial uncertainty around and billions having already been wiped off the worlds stockmarkets there has never been a better time to jetison this silly do nothing tax! Even that lightweight politician Tones Abbott says this is Ms Gillards “get out of jail free card” - and hes right. She could appear on TV and successfully anounce a strategic withdrawal and in time all would seem ok - Abbott himself says now is not the time for one so hes already in agreeance. But of course as we all know good old Tones favourite read is the many positioned Karma Sutra so God only knows what direction he would take then - probably announce his support for one!

    • Dave C says:

      07:36pm | 13/08/11

      I am an LNP supporter but this article/opinion hints at another problem we have in politics, ON BOTH SIDES….

      How many politicians have ever really experienced enough of a real job, and I mean a real job with real pressures. The modern day ALP go from politics 101 at Uni to Union rep/hack (The SDA is but one example in this article) to ALP staffer to preselected ALP candidate to member in a very short time. Honestly have Shorten, Combet or Howes had any real world experience. (Rudd was a diplomat who toured the world, Gillard worked for an ALP aligned law firm but is that enough) of the rest of the ALP (and Greens politicians) how many of them have worked for a struggling small business or even a larger business in financial trouble, how many of them had mortgages at that time and struggled to feed the family. Yet it seems all they are interested in are rights for Aboriginal Muslim Lesbian Vegan Asylum Seeker Push Bike Riders, that is because of course the answer to my above question is NO.

      Now as for the Libs and Nats, they are not much if at all better in terms of world experience. From private school to young Libs at uni (doing law of course and nothing else) to staffer to preselection to member of the party. Abbott was a trainee priest (I actually like him but honestly he hasnt had enough real world experience) Now from that background how do they understand small business people or Low income wage earners with families. Answer they dont. At least some in the Nats understand, Barnaby ran his own accounting business and most Nats at least run or grow up on farms which are small business.

      This is a good article that shows but one example of a greater problem with politics today.

    • jf says:

      12:55pm | 14/08/11

      “Abbott was a trainee priest”

      He was also a journalist and worked as an employee in private enterprise.

      But I do agree. To many politicians have to little real-world experience. They don’t understand the pressures of working in private enterprise or of running their own business. They’ve never had to face the risk and uncertainty of not having a well-remunerated, tenured job with considerable entitlements and benefits.

      Political experience is important in any political party but so is commercial experience.

    • Youssef says:

      09:29pm | 13/08/11

      what a coincidence chloe fox decided to sign up. i am surprised it took her so long! its also no coincidence that shopping hours in sa are ridiculous and the big retailers were scathing in regard to this. k mart has 24 hour stores in nsw, qld and tasmania. yes, tasmania. they would not dare try this in sa

    • Spenny says:

      11:05am | 14/08/11

      On the one hand, Kenny suggests the union is powerless because he’s never heard of a retail strike, so therefore they don’t act in the interests of their members. On the other hand, Kenny suggests the SDA are powerful and effective negotiators through their participation in the ALP.
      Kenny’s proposal? Strike both the ALP and the retail industry. I didn’t know Kenny was a militant unionist. Fight the power, comrade.

    • marley says:

      12:06pm | 14/08/11

      I don’t think Kenny is saying the SDA is powerless. I think he’s saying it’s self-interested, and uses its powers for the good of its hierarchy and not for the good of its members.  Maybe what’s needed is for its members to strike against the SDA.

    • jf says:

      01:01pm | 14/08/11

      Whilst the unions who have stopped representing their members and become fund-raising machines and post-graduate training grounds for the ALP, the industry super funds have become fund-raising machines and influential lobbyists for the same party.

      Whereas the unions take worker’s fees on the promise that they will represent their industrial rights, the industry super funds take their member’s fees and tell them that the wil represent their retirement rights.

      Whereas the unions donate considerable amounts of money to the ALP and aligned organisations, the industry super fnds donate considerable amounts of money to the ALP and aligned organisations.

      Still, at least with the unions the fee is where the gouging stops. With the industry super funds the donations, sponsorships and so on are taken directly from member accounts with no transparency or disclosure.

    • Michael says:

      08:18pm | 14/08/11

      There are many factual problems with this article. But the real question is, why hasn’t Mark Kenny mentioned his ALP membership and his falling out with the SA Right in the 1990’s? Hence his anger perhaps?

    • emel says:

      05:30pm | 15/08/11

      Michael be careful. Your history is not one to be overly proud of, and throwing unsubstantiated comments out there just might backfire on you. Is it not understandable that many journalists who have a keen interest in politics have had various organisational memberships in their past?
      Kenny shows no anger here, just the disapointment that we all feel from watching the SDA control leadership/policy within SA ALP instead of the caucus.
      The other factual errors you speak of can be listed in your response please. Would you like me to mention your previous affiliations now or later?

    • emel says:

      05:30pm | 15/08/11

      Michael be careful. Your history is not one to be overly proud of, and throwing unsubstantiated comments out there just might backfire on you. Is it not understandable that many journalists who have a keen interest in politics have had various organisational memberships in their past?
      Kenny shows no anger here, just the disapointment that we all feel from watching the SDA control leadership/policy within SA ALP instead of the caucus.
      The other factual errors you speak of can be listed in your response please. Would you like me to mention your previous affiliations now or later?

    • Utopia Boy says:

      08:55pm | 14/08/11

      I was a member of the SDA waaaaayyy back 1986 - 91. When I was retrenched during a corporate restructuring (Coles supermarkets), I approached the union for support. No response, no assistance, no returning of phone calls and certainly no official meeting with any union representative.
      Last. Union. Ever.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter