Today I am a pleased lil’ constituent. ACT Minister for Sport Andrew Barr is standing firm as negotiations with the Australian Football League, for the right to host AFL games at Manuka Oval, become crotchety.

The AFL wants Canberra to pay a fortune for the privilege of a few bouts at Manuka Oval.

Until recently the negotiations had been unfolding akin to a Beckett script – the AFL thrust into the superior ‘Godot’ role while the Minister slipped obediently into a plausible translation of the masters of mundane, Vladimir and Estragon.

The AFL’s asking price, a hefty $800,000 for the right to host two top flight fixtures, is a $436,000 increase on the current two-year deal which expires this year. The AFL is justifying the cash grab by suggesting that two pre-season and two competition games held in 2008 generated $1.13 million into the ACT economy.

It’s worth noting that for a combined sum of $115,000, the ACT Government successfully negotiated for the Socceroos, Wallabies and Opals to play internationals in Canberra this calendar year.

The Canberra Times has kept a close eye on the negotiations with recent editorial and opinion pieces urging Barr to remain steadfast, as the AFL (in its prerogative business interests) blatantly shuns the capital to ‘pursue the lucrative markets of western Sydney and the Gold Coast’.

Barr has been guarded in his remarks, refusing to burn bridges between the ACT Government and the AFL. The Government has been burned before – in 2006, the North Melbourne Kangaroos ended its association with the capital and high tailed it to Carrara Stadium up on the Gold Coast.

Aware of the potential Groundhog Day implications Barr spoke candidly this past week, stating that any new deal would be tied to the inclusion of a top Victorian team (he suggested St Kilda or Geelong).

Further to this, Barr suggested that comments made by the AFL Chief Executive Andrew Demetriou have confirmed that the negotiations have ‘seemingly stopped being about growing the game and became all about a financial transaction’. This was a strident move and lets Demetriou know that the ACT won’t cop another shellacking.

It has also solidified in this constituent’s mind Barr’s credibility as a future leader of the ACT Labor Party. Elected to the ACT legislative Assembly in 2006, and given key portfolios in Planning, Education and Training as well as Children and Young People and Tourism, Sport and Recreation.

Barr was immediately handed the deafening assignment of closing 23 of the Territory’s schools - an unenviable task which left voters with a nasty scar and which will haunt Barr for the rest of his political career.
As Demetriou spits out condescending lines such as ‘I don’t think (St Kilda or Geelong) are the clubs we’ve got our eyes on to be honest’, Barr and the ACT Government should shun the AFL and consider using the funding to boost its local AFL competition, which coincidentally boasts the Sydney Swans reserves.

It could use ACT AFL stars to promote its healthy living initiatives - through educational visits and training programs. This would send a strong message that the ACT will continue to seriously development the sport in the region despite attempts by the AFL to play the bully.

Vladimir: Good. A diversion comes along and what do we do? Come, let’s get to work!

With a genuine interest in the sport portfolio, the Canberra Darters (netball ) number one ticket holder is also often seen cheering on the Canberra Capitals women’s basketball team or chewing on the cauliflower ear of former rah-rah great Stephen Larkham at Brumbies matches.

If Barr stands firm and refuses to be taken advantage of by the AFL, he might just shed the Beckett tag and get a better deal for his constituents in the process.

5 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • rob says:

      09:48am | 17/08/09

      It’d be interesting to see a comparison between this cash grab by the AFL in Canberra, and what has happened in Tasmania (not necessarily including the Hawthorn sponsorship by the government)

    • Kym Durance says:

      03:33pm | 17/08/09

      The ACT is a small and inconsequential market for most sports - especially AFL -
      if anything the AFL is purposely pricing them out of the place - the only use the ACT might have for the AFL would be as a place of fligt and refuge for a struggling club like North Melbourne for example - if they maintain a presence up their when they go it wont seem all that spooky for them - or the next club that runs into economic strife and even then it would brief respite.

      Once the Gold Coast kicks in no one will give the ACT a second thought -

      I mean the AFL does give a rats about Tasmania - they already won that market - so why bother with Canberra and surrounds - ? nope - no future there.

    • Tim says:

      04:15pm | 17/08/09

      Kym,
      the other fact is that very few in the ACT care about the AFL either. They struggle to fill Manuka Oval which is only a small ground and would not be able to get a large crowd unless they could attract one of the better teams, which will never happen.
      Other than a vocal Victorian expat community, the AFL is on a hiding to nothing in the ACT.

    • AJ says:

      04:28pm | 17/08/09

      “It has also solidified in this constituent’s mind Barr’s credibility as a future leader of the ACT Labor Party”

      Oh come on.  Is the bar so low that ‘having the aptitude to not take an obviously bad deal’ is now a leadership quality?

    • Aussie Jack says:

      06:45pm | 17/08/09

      What a disgrace Australia’s capital Canberra is not an Australian Football stronghold.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

TAbbott to fight PHI rebate cuts on behalf of 2.5 million to pay extra, but won't say what he'd do as PM. http://t.co/lXWpMXXF

Anthony Sharwood

Numerous workplace safety rules (no harness, fall arrest etc) broken in this pic of Roosters coach Brian Smith http://t.co/jx4PgtBs

Anthony Sharwood

Yo, mummy bloggers! Your expert input is required in this doozy of a child-rearing dilemma http://t.co/0JfOnCq1

Daniel Piotrowski

How we're getting ripped off at the ATM http://t.co/Vpu8DuHy

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Would you kill for a job?

Would you kill for a job?

Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter